IMPROVING THE ACCOUNTING OF COMMODITY-MATERIAL RESERVES IN COMMERCIAL BANKS

Аннотация

Privatization plays a vital role in fostering economic growth and improving fiscal stability in emerging economies. By transferring state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to private ownership, governments aim to increase efficiency, attract investment, and expand the tax base. This article examines how privatization impacts tax revenue generation, highlighting its opportunities and challenges.

Тип источника: Конференции
Годы охвата с 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Выпуск:
85-86
38

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Поделиться
Muxsinov , A., & Kilicheva, F. . (2025). IMPROVING THE ACCOUNTING OF COMMODITY-MATERIAL RESERVES IN COMMERCIAL BANKS. Международная конференция академических наук, 4(1), 85–86. извлечено от https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/icas/article/view/63840
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Аннотация

Privatization plays a vital role in fostering economic growth and improving fiscal stability in emerging economies. By transferring state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to private ownership, governments aim to increase efficiency, attract investment, and expand the tax base. This article examines how privatization impacts tax revenue generation, highlighting its opportunities and challenges.


background image

МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ

АКАДЕМИЧЕСКИХ НАУК

85

IMPROVING THE ACCOUNTING OF COMMODITY-MATERIAL

RESERVES IN COMMERCIAL BANKS

Muxsinov Azizbek Shavkatovich

Master’s student at Graduate School of Business and Entrepreneurship

Kilicheva Farida Beshimovna

Doctor of philosophy in Economics

Departament of finance and credit at Renaissance university of education

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14731425

Privatization plays a vital role in fostering economic growth and improving

fiscal stability in emerging economies. By transferring state-owned enterprises
(SOEs) to private ownership, governments aim to increase efficiency, attract
investment, and expand the tax base. This article examines how privatization
impacts tax revenue generation, highlighting its opportunities and challenges.

Positive Effects on Tax Revenue
Privatized enterprises often achieve higher efficiency, leading to increased

profitability and higher corporate tax contributions. Privatization broadens the
tax base by stimulating economic activities, creating jobs, and attracting foreign
direct investment (FDI). Greater transparency and compliance among private
entities further enhance tax collection efficiency.

Challenges in Tax Revenue Generation
Despite its benefits, privatization can result in the loss of direct revenues

from profitable SOEs, with tax revenues taking time to offset this loss. Issues like
undervaluation of assets, tax avoidance, and weak regulatory frameworks can
limit the fiscal benefits. Additionally, privatization in strategic sectors can lead to
monopolistic practices without proper oversight.

Global Examples
Countries like India, Brazil, and South Africa have seen privatization boost

tax revenues and attract FDI, though challenges like inequality and regulatory
gaps remain. Russia’s rapid privatization highlights the risks of asset
undervaluation and wealth concentration.

Strategies for Maximizing Tax Revenue
Governments should ensure transparency in privatization processes,

develop robust regulatory frameworks, and reinvest proceeds into
infrastructure and public services. Encouraging compliance and preventing
monopolistic practices are key to sustaining fiscal benefits.

Conclusion


background image

МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ

АКАДЕМИЧЕСКИХ НАУК

86

Privatization has the potential to significantly enhance tax revenue generation in
emerging economies. However, its success depends on transparency, regulatory
oversight, and strategic reinvestment of proceeds. With proper planning,
privatization can strengthen fiscal sustainability and promote long-term
economic growth.

List of literature:

1.

Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. (2001). “From State to Market: A Survey of

Empirical Studies on Privatization.”Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321–
389.
2.

Boubakri, N., & Cosset, J.-C. (1998).“The Financial and Operating

Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries.”
The Journal of Finance, 53(3), 1081–1110.
3.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994).“Politicians and Firms.” The Quarterly

Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995–1025.
4.

D’Souza, J., & Megginson, W. L. (1999). “The Financial and Operating

Performance of Privatized Firms During the 1990s.” The Journal of Finance,
54(4), 1397–1438.

Библиографические ссылки

Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. (2001). “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization.”Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321–389.

Boubakri, N., & Cosset, J.-C. (1998).“The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries.” The Journal of Finance, 53(3), 1081–1110.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994).“Politicians and Firms.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995–1025.

D’Souza, J., & Megginson, W. L. (1999). “The Financial and Operating Performance of Privatized Firms During the 1990s.” The Journal of Finance, 54(4), 1397–1438.