Авторы

  • Ферангиз Нарзикулова
    University of Economics and Pedagogy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.120557

Аннотация

Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) profoundly transformed 20th-century philosophy. His early work advanced logic and the picture theory of language, while his later writings reconceived language as rooted in everyday practice. This article examines Wittgenstein's spiritual underpinnings—his mystical inclinations and religious reflections—and explores his legacy for social philosophy. We argue that his concepts of language-games, family resemblance, rule-following, and forms of life offer constructive frameworks for the development of contemporary social theory and philosophical praxis.

 

 

background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1572

WITTGENSTEIN'S SPIRITUAL LEGACY AND THE PROSPECTS FOR

DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT

Narzikulova Ferangiz Rustamjonovna

English teacher, independent Researcher

University of Economics and Pedagogy,

Samarkand Campus, Uzbekistan

Abstract:

Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) profoundly transformed 20th-century philosophy.

His early work advanced logic and the picture theory of language, while his later writings

reconceived language as rooted in everyday practice. This article examines Wittgenstein's

spiritual underpinnings—his mystical inclinations and religious reflections—and explores his

legacy for social philosophy. We argue that his concepts of language-games, family

resemblance, rule-following, and forms of life offer constructive frameworks for the

development of contemporary social theory and philosophical praxis.

Keywords:

Philosophy, spiritual underpinnings, religious reflections, language-games, family

resemblance, rule-following, and philosophical praxis.

Introduction.

Wittgenstein remains central to analytical philosophy, yet his contributions

transcend pure logic. Influenced by a deep spiritual orientation—evidenced by mystical

passages in Tractatus and a sustained interest in religion—he maintained that many crucial

human experiences (ethical, aesthetic, mystical) lie beyond the reach of propositional language

Simultaneously, his later philosophy foregrounds language as a fundamentally social activity,

reshaping social thought and the study of human behavior. This paper explores these twin

threads—spirituality and social philosophy—assessing their enduring prospects.

Methods.

This study employs a conceptual analytical approach. Core primary texts

(Tractatus, Philosophical Investigations, Lectures on Religious Belief) were examined

alongside key secondary literature. Philosophical concepts were synthesized to evaluate their

applicability in contemporary discourse. Emphasis was placed on tracing Wittgenstein's

spiritual commitments and mapping their implications for social-philosophical theory.

Results.

A. Spiritual Dimension: Mysticism and Religious Outlook

In the Tractatus, Wittgenstein emphasizes the ineffable: the mystical, ethical, and aesthetic

aspects of life defy propositional language—"whereof one cannot speak"? His "Lecture on

Ethics" interprets this nonsensicality as profound—these expressions, while nonsensical, reveal

deep spiritual insight

.

Biographically, Wittgenstein's wartime journals and his later inquiries

reveal serious engagement with Christian spirituality and monastic ideals

.

He viewed religion

not as truth claims but as spiritually grounded forms of life.

Philosophy of Language and Social Thought


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1573

Language‑Games & Rule‑Following. In Philosophical Investigations, meaning emerges from

contextual "language-games"—forms of life bound by rules; private language is incoherent

without communal criteria.

Family Resemblance

Concepts lack fixed boundaries; they connect through overlapping similarities—essential for

understanding meaning and classification

Forms of Life & Social Ontology

Language practice is embedded in concrete social practices. Forms of life create shared contexts

for meaning, anchoring individual action within culture.

Discussion.

Wittgenstein's fusion of spiritual reflection and social-philosophical insight

offers fertile ground for both religious studies and social theory.
1. Spiritual Thought
He advocates reverent silence in the face of the ineffable, aligning with mystical traditions.

Contemporary theology may positively engage this approach: spiritual experiences expressed

non-propositionally preserve authenticity within their own forms
2. Social and Cultural Practice
Wittgenstein challenges essentialist definitions in social science. His framework encourages

ethnographic sensitivity: instead of universal rules, one examines how communities enact

language-games and form meaning through shared history and practice.
3. Methodological Implications
Philosophy should move away from abstract theorizing, towards attention to language use and

lived forms of life. Social research should treat "rule-following" as an embedded, communal

process. Classification systems in psychology, anthropology, and philosophy should be

informed by family resemblance, not rigid categories. These prospects tie together

Wittgenstein's mystical humility with a robust, practice-oriented philosophy.

Conclusion.

Ludwig Wittgenstein's spiritual legacy—characterized by reverent silence and

deep mystical insight—complements his revolutionary social philosophy. His later work

demonstrates language's communal roots, conceptual flexibility, and embeddedness in forms of

life. Together, these paradigms suggest a philosophy that is both humble before the ineffable

and engaged with lived human practices. Future philosophical and social-scientific research can

build on this legacy by honoring both the mystery and the methodology of human life.

References:

1. Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico- Philosophicus. 1921.

2. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. 1953.

3. Wittgenstein, L. Lecture on Ethics. Cambridge, 1929

4. “Language

game

(philosophy).”

Wikipedia.

modernghana.com+1iep.utm.edu+1newyorker.com+1eurasiareview.com+1ndpr.nd.edu+1m

dpi.com+1en.wikipedia.org

5. “Private language argument.” Wikipedia.

en.wikipedia.org


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1574

6. “Family

resemblance.”

Wikipedia.

en.wikipedia.org+2en.wikipedia.org+2plato.stanford.edu+2

7. “Problem

of

religious

language.”

Wikipedia.

en.wikipedia.org+4en.wikipedia.org+4ndpr.nd.edu+4

8. Syed Raiyan Amir, “The Puzzle of Meaning…” Eurasia Review. Nov 21, 2024.

eurasiareview.com+1modernghana.com+1

9. Theodore R. Schatzki, “Wittgenstein and the social context…” Sociology Theory, 2000.

iep.utm.edu+2journals.sagepub.com+2undsoc.org+2

10. Ruy J. G. B. de Queiroz, “Meaning as Use…” arXiv, Jun 8, 2025

Библиографические ссылки

Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus. 1921.

Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. 1953.

Wittgenstein, L. Lecture on Ethics. Cambridge, 1929

“Language game (philosophy).” Wikipedia. modernghana.com+1iep.utm.edu+1newyorker.com+1eurasiareview.com+1ndpr.nd.edu+1mdpi.com+1en.wikipedia.org

“Private language argument.” Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org

“Family resemblance.” Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org+2en.wikipedia.org+2plato.stanford.edu+2

“Problem of religious language.” Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org+4en.wikipedia.org+4ndpr.nd.edu+4

Syed Raiyan Amir, “The Puzzle of Meaning…” Eurasia Review. Nov 21, 2024. eurasiareview.com+1modernghana.com+1

Theodore R. Schatzki, “Wittgenstein and the social context…” Sociology Theory, 2000. iep.utm.edu+2journals.sagepub.com+2undsoc.org+2

Ruy J. G. B. de Queiroz, “Meaning as Use…” arXiv, Jun 8, 2025