Authors

  • Shoyatbek Todjikhujaev Shukurillo Ogly
    Assistant of the Department of Oncology at the Andijan state medical institute, Andijan, Uzbekistan
  • Dilfuza Mamarasulova Zakirjanovna
    Doctor of science Professor of the Department of Oncology at the Andijan state medical institute, Andijan, Uzbekistan
  • Albina Khudoyarova Gumarovna
    PhD, docent at the Department of Physiology at the Andijan state medical institute, Andijan, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijasr.131686

Keywords:

Population comparative data on various vaccines complete vaccination

Abstract

Today, one of the most promising methods of combating COVID-19 is considered complete vaccination, which should provide collective immunity to more than 65% of the total population. As you know, the World Health Organization (WHO) has approved the accelerated registration procedure for vaccines against SARSCoV-2, and several vaccines are already available for use in a number of countries. Table 1 provides a summary of comparative data on various vaccines and their effectiveness when used.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 03-2024

81



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

03

Pages:

81-88

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135




















































A

BSTRACT

Today, one of the most promising methods of combating COVID-19 is considered complete vaccination,
which should provide collective immunity to more than 65% of the total population. As you know, the
World Health Organization (WHO) has approved the accelerated registration procedure for vaccines
against SARSCoV-2, and several vaccines are already available for use in a number of countries. Table 1
provides a summary of comparative data on various vaccines and their effectiveness when used.

K

EYWORDS

Population, comparative data on various vaccines, complete vaccination.

I

NTRODUCTION

Today, one of the most promising methods of
combating COVID-19 is considered complete

vaccination, which should provide collective
immunity to more than 65% of the total

Journal

Website:

http://sciencebring.co
m/index.php/ijasr

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.

Research Article

MONITORING THE CURRENT STATE OF VACCINATION
(REVIEW)


Submission Date:

March 18,

2024,

Accepted Date:

March 23, 2024,

Published Date:

March 28, 2024

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-04-03-17


Shoyatbek Todjikhujaev Shukurillo Ogly

Assistant of the Department of Oncology at the Andijan state medical institute, Andijan, Uzbekistan

Dilfuza Mamarasulova Zakirjanovna

Doctor of science Professor of the Department of Oncology at the Andijan state medical institute, Andijan,
Uzbekistan

Albina Khudoyarova Gumarovna

PhD, docent at the Department of Physiology at the Andijan state medical institute, Andijan, Uzbekistan


background image

Volume 04 Issue 03-2024

82



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

03

Pages:

81-88

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































population. As you know, the World Health
Organization (WHO) has approved the
accelerated registration procedure for vaccines
against SARSCoV-2, and several vaccines are
already available for use in a number of countries.
Table 1 provides a summary of comparative data
on various vaccines and their effectiveness when
used. As can be seen from the table, mRNA
vaccines from different developers, vector
vaccines from different developers, vaccines with
inactivated virus, and others were subject to
comparison. Some of them had WHO approval

and the effectiveness results expressed as a
percentage show that 2-dose vaccines at intervals
of 20 to 30 days are still more acceptable, since
the e/ffectiveness rates exceed 90%, despite the
different

number

of

vaccination

/participants[7,8,9].

In short, the objective of our study was to
summarize the currently available information
regarding the effectiveness and safety of available
vaccines, and vaccines approved in Uzbekistan,
for the prevention of COVID-19.

Table 1

The effectiveness of vaccines for the prevention of COVID-19, according to clinical

studies

Name

Developer

Technology

Research

Effecti

vity

Dose

regimen

WHO

regist

ration

BNT162b2

Pfizer/Biotech

mRNA

Phase III -
43 488
participant
s

95%

Multi -dose
with
interval 21
days

+

mRNA-1273

Moderna

mRNA

Phase III -
30 420
participant
s

94.1%

Multi -dose
with
interval 28
days

+

ChAdOx1nC
oV-
19/AZD1222

AstraZeneca/
University

of

Oxford

Adenovirus
vector

Phase III -
11 636
participant
s

70.4%

Multi -dose
with
interval 28
days

+

Ad26.COV2.
S

Janssen/Johnson
&Johnson

Adenovirus
vector

Phase III -
19 630
participant
s

66.1

Single dose

+

Gam-
COVID-Vac/

Sputnik V

Gamaleya
Research
Institute

of

Adenovirus
vector

Phase III -
19 866
participant

91.6

Multi -dose
with
interval 21

Under
consid
eratio


background image

Volume 04 Issue 03-2024

83



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

03

Pages:

81-88

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































Epidemiology
and
Microbiology

s

days

n

EpiVacCoron
a

VECTOR
Center

of

Virology

S

protein

SARS-
CoV-2

Phase III-
3000
participats

Results
Septem
ber
2021

Multi -dose
with
interval 21
days

-

Sputnik Light Gamaleya

Research
Institute

of

Epidemiology
and
Microbiology

Adenovirus
vector

Phase I,II

Results
July
2021

Single dose

-

CoviVac

Chumakov
Center at the
Russian
Academy

of

Sciences

Inactivated
vaccine

Informatio
n is not
provided

Inform
ation is
not
provide
d

Multi -dose
with
interval 14
days

-

1.1 Current vaccination status indicators

We have been considering monitoring the status
of vaccination against coronavirus in Uzbekistan
since the beginning of this campaign on
04/06/2021. As is known, the following vaccines
against COVID-19 have been approved in
Uzbekistan:

• Moderna

• Oxford/AstraZeneca

• Pfizer/BioNTech

• Sinovac

• Sputnik Light

• Sputnik V

• ZF2001

Studying the current vaccination statistics as of
February 5, 2023 (Uzbekistan), we have the
following indicators: with a population of
34,382,000 people, the number of vaccinated
people was 21,674,823, which in percentage
terms was 63.04%. 18,101,452 people were fully
vaccinated, which also amounted to 52.65%
respectively. The booster dose was 15,319,866,
respectively

44.56%.

Total

vaccinations

74,976,351. As notes, here is a breakdown of the
keywords we use:

- number of vaccinated people - the total number
of people who have received at least one dose of
the vaccine;

- fully vaccinated - the total number of people who
have received all doses prescribed by the
vaccination protocol;


background image

Volume 04 Issue 03-2024

84



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

03

Pages:

81-88

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































- booster dose - the total number of people who
received an additional booster dose;

- total vaccinations - the total number of doses
administered (the number of single doses may
not equal the total number of people vaccinated -
depending on the vaccination protocol, people
may receive multiple doses)

Current statistics on coronavirus as of March 20,
2023 (worldwide) had their own characteristics,
for example: total infections were noted

682,546,142 people. Deaths according to global
data amounted to

6,819,835 people, which is a percentage of 1.0%.
Recovered - 655,465,609, respectively 96.0%.

Table 2

Percentage of population vaccinated against coronavirus

(COVID-19) by leading countries as of 03/18/2023

Countries

Single dose

Multi dose

Total %

Cambodia

3,68

85,3

88,97

UAE

*

*

97

Qatar

*

*

95

Chile

*

*

91

Hong Kong

*

*

89

Nicaragua

*

87,3

Cuba

*

88

China

*

*

88

Portugal

*

87

Spain

*

87

Vietnam

*

85

Note. * - receiving vaccine doses

The data presented in table 2 reflects the
percentage of vaccination of the world population
against COVID-19. The table shows statistics on
complete vaccination against coronavirus - this
means receiving all doses prescribed by the
vaccination protocol. If a person receives the first
dose of a two-dose vaccine, they are not
considered fully vaccinated. The table shows the

percentages of both partially and fully vaccinated
residents. Data is only available for countries that
report vaccination statistics. Some countries
provide statistics not on people, but on the total
number of vaccine doses administered.

As the Ministry of Health of Uzbekistan reported,
almost 53 million doses of coronavirus vaccines
were used to vaccinate the population in


background image

Volume 04 Issue 03-2024

85



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

03

Pages:

81-88

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































Uzbekistan, 16 million doses are in reserve. Full
vaccination coverage is 77%, as of May 19, 2022
(according to the Ministry of Health).

To date, according to the Ministry of Health in
Uzbekistan, the number of doses of different
vaccines against coronavirus in use is close to 70
million, which is much higher than the planned
doses of vaccines. For example, the following
number of doses was used during vaccination:

• 2,606,080 doses

- AstraZeneca;

• 48169038 doses

- ZF-UZ-VAZ 2001 (of which

6172770 doses produced in Uzbekistan);

• 1,341,790 doses

- Sputnik V;

• 10688860 doses

- Moderna;

• 4,626,180 doses

- Pfizer/BioNTech;

• 1,976,000 doses

- Sinovac;

• 343,375 doses of Sputnik Light.The vaccine

reserve is 16 million 200 thousand doses, the

ministry’s press service said in a statement. The

Ministry of Health provided data that the planned
coverage of the population with the first dose of

the vaccine is 94.6%, and “full vaccination”

coverage is 76.9%. However, in October, the

Ministry of Health provided information on how
many vaccinated people fell ill with coronavirus
in the country. Since the beginning of mass
vaccination (April 1), of all those sick with
coronavirus, only 285 people, or about 0.3%, have
received the vaccine, reported the deputy head of
the sanitary and epidemiological service.

From the data in Table 3, we see that initially
there were preferences for taking vaccines and
their doses. For example, the table shows that the
predominance of the number of people
vaccinated with the 2nd dose, both in general data
and, in particular, for specific vaccines. Figure 1
reflects the morbidity characteristics of
vaccinated residents as a percentage depending
on the frequency of vaccinations. For example, the
incidence after 1 dose of Moderna was almost
100%. The AstraZeneca vaccine gave a high rate
after 2 doses. While the Sputnik V vaccine gave
average incidence rates for both doses. However,
the results of morbidity after vaccination with the
ZF-UZ-VAZ 2001 vaccine were within smaller
limits, but with their own peculiarity, that is, the
morbidity after the 3rd dose was the same.
Perhaps the reliability of these indicators differs
due to the different number of residents who took
part in the study.

Table 3

Percentage of vaccinations by vaccine and dose since the start of vaccination

Vaccinated people
with
ZF-UZVAK

Vaccinated
people with
Astrazeneka

Vaccinated
people with
Sputnik V

All surveyed


background image

Volume 04 Issue 03-2024

86



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

03

Pages:

81-88

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































Single
dose

Multi-
dose

Single
dose

Multi-
dose

Single
dose

Multi-
dose

Single
dose

Multi-
dose

236
(46,4%)

272
(53,6%)

53
(13,8%)

332
(86,2%)

46
(52,2%)

42
(47,8%)

409
(27,8%)

649
(44,1%)

508

385

88

1058

According to information from the Ministry of
Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan, studies were
carried out of the serological status of persons
who received vaccines against the SARS-COV-2

coronavirus, as well as a comparative analysis of
immunization in those vaccinated with different
vaccines and in residents who did not receive the
vaccine.

Table 4

IgG immunoglobulin level in persons who have not received the vaccine

Level of IgG,
BAU/ml


0-1,0
(n=18; 4,3%)


1,01-100,0
(n=261; 63%)


100,01-1000
(n=114; 27,5%)


˃1000
(n=2; 0,4%)

Average
index

0,54±0,16

36,1±6,09

226,5±73,1

1649±1261,

As can be seen from the table, the average IgG
immunoglobulin level in individuals who have not
received the vaccine varies significantly. So, for
example, with a titer of 1.01-100.0 it was 63%.
Persons with titles of greater significance were
encountered much less often.

According to the data of these studies, presented
in Table 5, a pattern of increase in the level of IgG
immunoglobulin depending on the dose is visible

when taking almost all vaccines. There is a more
active formation of the IgG immunoglobulin titer
from 50% to 65% when taking all vaccines at the
2nd dose. The titer ranges from 100 to 1000
BAU/ml. Tiers over 1000 range from 10% to 15%
also when receiving 2 doses of the vaccine. These
numbers indicate that vaccination should be
complete, according to approved protocols
specifically for each vaccine used.

Table 5

Indicators of the dependence of the level of immunoglobulin IgG on the frequency of

doses received by vaccines


background image

Volume 04 Issue 03-2024

87



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

03

Pages:

81-88

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































Level

of

IgG,
BAU/ml



0-1,0



1,01-100,0



100,01-1000



˃1000

Single
dose

Multi
-dose

Single
dose

Multi-
dose

Single
dose

Multi-
dose

Single
dose

Multi-
dose


ZF-UZVAK


1-5%


0,5-
2%


32%


53%


31%


60%


0,5%


10%

Astrazeneka

0,5%

0,1%

35%

65%

35%

53%

-

10%

Спутник V

0,5%

-

33%

55%

48%

53%

-

15%

C

ONCLUSION

In conclusion of the monitoring carried out on the
issue of the current situation with vaccination for
Covid-19, it should be noted that no matter how

“dissident” events were carried out aimed at

refusing vaccination in general and against Covid-
19 in particular, the correct actions of the media
information and sufficient awareness of the
population about this problem directs measures
to form collective immunity from Covid-19 in the
right direction, which reduces the percentage of
seriously ill patients, elderly and senile patients,
deaths in various age groups, and also leads to a
mitigation of complications after past infection.

The preventive strategy for this problem is
absolutely provable. The effectiveness of
vaccination is reflected statistically reliably in
many countries and in almost all age and gender
groups of residents.

R

EFERENCES

1.

Abbasi J. COVID-19 and mRNA Vaccines-First
Large Test for a New Approach. JAMA. 2020
Sep

3.

PubMed:

https://pubmed.gov/32880613.

Full-text:

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.16866

2.

Agarwal A, Mukherjee A, Kumar G, Chatterjee
P, Bhatnagar T, Malhotra P; PLACID Trial
Collaborators. Convalescent plasma in the
management of moderate covid-19 in adults
in India: open label phase II multicentre
randomised controlled trial (PLACID Trial).
BMJ. 2020 Oct 22;371:m3939. PubMed:
https://pubmed.gov/33093056.

Full-text:

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3939

3.

Agrawal AS, Tao X, Algaissi A, et al.
Immunization with inactivated Middle East
Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus vaccine
leads to lung immunopathology on challenge
with live virus. Hum Vaccin Immunother.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 03-2024

88



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

03

Pages:

81-88

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































2016

Sep;12(9):2351-6.

PubMed:

https://pubmed.gov/27269431.

Full-text:

https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.11
77688

4.

Hodgson SH, Mansatta K, Mallett G, Harris V,
Emary KWR, Pollard AJ. What defines an
efficacious COVID-19 vaccine? A review of the
challenges assessing the clinical efficacy of
vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Lancet Infect
Dis 2020, published 27 October. Full-text:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-
3099(20)30773-8

5.

Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, et
al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2
and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically
Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020 Apr
16;181(2):271-280.e8.

PubMed:

https://pubmed.gov/32142651.

Full-text:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052

6.

WHO 20200409. WHO target product profiles
for COVID-19 vaccines. WHO 2020, published
9 April, accessed 2 September, 2020. Full-text:
https://www.who.int/who-documents-
detail/who-target-product-profiles-for-
covid-19-vaccines

7.

WHO 20200506. Key criteria for the ethical
acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge
studies. WHO 2020, published 6 May. Full-
text:
https://www.who.int/ethics/publications/k
ey-criteria-ethical-acceptability-of-covid-19-
human-challenge/en/

8.

WHO 20201231. WHO issues its first
emergency use validation for a COVID-19
vaccine and emphasizes need for equitable
global access. WHO 2020, published 31

December.

Full-text:

https://www.who.int/news/item/31-12-
2020-who-issues-its-first-emergency-use-
validation-for-a-covid-19-vaccine-and-
emphasizes-need-for-equitable-global-access

References

Abbasi J. COVID-19 and mRNA Vaccines-First Large Test for a New Approach. JAMA. 2020 Sep 3. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32880613. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.16866

Agarwal A, Mukherjee A, Kumar G, Chatterjee P, Bhatnagar T, Malhotra P; PLACID Trial Collaborators. Convalescent plasma in the management of moderate covid-19 in adults in India: open label phase II multicentre randomised controlled trial (PLACID Trial). BMJ. 2020 Oct 22;371:m3939. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/33093056. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3939

Agrawal AS, Tao X, Algaissi A, et al. Immunization with inactivated Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus vaccine leads to lung immunopathology on challenge with live virus. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Sep;12(9):2351-6. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/27269431. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2016.1177688

Hodgson SH, Mansatta K, Mallett G, Harris V, Emary KWR, Pollard AJ. What defines an efficacious COVID-19 vaccine? A review of the challenges assessing the clinical efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Lancet Infect Dis 2020, published 27 October. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30773-8

Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020 Apr 16;181(2):271-280.e8. PubMed: https://pubmed.gov/32142651. Full-text: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052

WHO 20200409. WHO target product profiles for COVID-19 vaccines. WHO 2020, published 9 April, accessed 2 September, 2020. Full-text: https://www.who.int/who-documents-detail/who-target-product-profiles-for-covid-19-vaccines

WHO 20200506. Key criteria for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies. WHO 2020, published 6 May. Full-text: https://www.who.int/ethics/publications/key-criteria-ethical-acceptability-of-covid-19-human-challenge/en/

WHO 20201231. WHO issues its first emergency use validation for a COVID-19 vaccine and emphasizes need for equitable global access. WHO 2020, published 31 December. Full-text: https://www.who.int/news/item/31-12-2020-who-issues-its-first-emergency-use-validation-for-a-covid-19-vaccine-and-emphasizes-need-for-equitable-global-access