Volume 04 Issue 05-2024
102
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
05
Pages:
102-106
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
(2024:
7.874
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
A
BSTRACT
In this article, we will study adverbial clauses, types of adverbial clauses formed with relative clauses, their
emergence with different grammatical means, and the study of semantic and structural aspects of clauses
with adverbial clauses. At the same time, scientific views and conclusions are given on the discovery of new
aspects within the scope of this problem by determining the linguistic factors of studying the linguistic
issues specific to adverbial clauses in different aspects.
K
EYWORDS
Conjunction, subordinate clause, predicative unit, subordinate predicative unit, main predicative unit,
style, style of scientific speech, relative clause, meaningful mixed relative clause.
I
NTRODUCTION
A compound sentence is one of the highest and
most complex forms of syntactic form in terms of
expression of thought. It is an undeniable fact that
in any language there is an equal and subjunctive
conjunction, both in terms of grammatical
structure and predicative features. Only the issue
of distinguishing them, especially compound
sentences with subordinate clauses, from simple
sentences complicated by expanded compound
sentence fragments is still controversial.
Journal
Website:
http://sciencebring.co
m/index.php/ijasr
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Research Article
COMPOUND SENTENCES WITH ADJECTIVE SENTENCES
FORMED USING REFERENCE CLAUSES USED IN SCIENTIFIC
SPEECH STYLE
Submission Date:
May 21,
2024,
Accepted Date:
May 26, 2024,
Published Date:
May 31, 2024
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-04-05-21
Teshaboyev Dilmurod Raxmadjonovich
Doctor of Philology (DSc), Fergana State University, Uzbekistan
Volume 04 Issue 05-2024
103
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
05
Pages:
102-106
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
(2024:
7.874
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
Relative clauses are formed with the help
of a relative pronoun (in some sources it is given
as a relative word) .
In linguistics, the issue of compound
sentences formed with the help of relative clauses
has not yet been fully researched. There are
controversial points in the conducted research. In
this article, we aim to reflect on one of the
separate types of conjunctions, which are used in
the scientific method: conjunctions with relative
clauses.
The main part.
A style that differs from other speech styles due
to its wealth of conclusions, definitions, and rules
is a scientific speech style. In this style of speech,
simple sentences and compound sentences of a
complex form are widely expressed. One of the
most used types of conjunctions is the conditional
clause. But we know that there are no adverbial
clauses formed using relative clauses among
conditional clauses. But this does not mean that
there are no adverbial clauses formed with the
help of relative clauses in the style of scientific
speech, although they are used less often in this
style. Compound sentences with adverbial
clauses formed using referential clauses in the
style of scientific speech differ from those in other
styles by some of their own characteristics.
First, in this style, all the necessary parts of
the sentence come in their place, that is, the order
is not changed and they are used all the time.
Because the scientific method requires
completeness and clarity of thought. This
requires that sentences contain all the necessary
parts. We can see this in the following sentences:
1. Ma’lum sintaktik butunlik tarkibida
qancha predikat bo‘lsa, u shuncha predikat
ifodadan iborat bo‘ladi. 2. Takt ichida urg‘uli
so‘zlar qancha bo‘lsa, fonetik so‘z ham shuncha
bo‘ladi. 3. Abadiy til qonuniyati asosida to‘g‘ri
yozish qanchalik muh
im bo‘lsa, to‘g‘ri talaffuz
qilish ham shunchalik zarurdir. 4. Lug‘at tarkibi
qancha boy va xilma-
xil bo‘lsa, til shunchalik boy
va taraqqiy etgan bo‘ladi (R.Ikromova).
It can be seen that all the above sentences are
grammatically complete. In any of them, it is
impossible to observe the situation where the
necessary sentence fragments have been omitted
or they have exchanged places with each other
(changed their position).
Secondly, the parts of compound sentences with
subordinate clauses formed with the help of
relative clauses used in the style of scientific
speech are always connected by the conditional
form of the verb (-sa):
1. Hikoyada mashhur adabiyotshunos To‘xtasin
Jalolovning yirik gapdasi qanchalar aniq
tasvirlangan bo‘lsa, uning nozik tabiatiga
xos
jasurlik, pokizalik, biroz o‘jarlik ham shunchalar
moddiy aks ettirilgan (Q.Yo‘ldoshev). 2. Lirik
qahramon
–
oshiq qancha ko‘p azob cheksa,
ma’shuqa shuncha ko‘p zulm qilishni yoqtiradi. 3.
Yakpora g‘azalning matlasida qaysi masala
ko‘tarilsa, keyingi
baytlarda ham shu mavzu izchil
yoritilmog‘i shart (N.Jumaxo‘ja).
Volume 04 Issue 05-2024
104
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
05
Pages:
102-106
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
(2024:
7.874
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
In all the sentences in the cited examples, the
participle of the subordinate clause is expressed
by a verb in the conditional mood, which is a clear
proof of our opinion.
Thirdly, in the texts of the scientific style, pairs of
referential clauses such as how much - so much,
how - so, which - that, how much - so much are
used more often and are characterized by their
use in both the subordinate predicative unit and
the main predicative unit. . Because in the course
of our observations, we did not come across a
situation where the reference clauses were
omitted in the main predicative unit of a single
compound sentence of this type found in scientific
texts. For example:
1. Lekin bu asarni tari
xiy fakt sifatida o‘sha
zamonda qanday yozilgan bo‘lsa, shunday taqdim
etmoqdaman (U.Normatov). 2. So‘zni shunday
yoritadiki, bu yog‘du bayt, g‘azalni yop
-
yorug‘
qiladi (A.Rasulov). 3. She’r ahli qanchalik bag‘ri
keng bo‘lsa, shunday inja va nafis (H.Bolta
boyev).
In one of the above-mentioned examples, the
word so is used instead of the reference clause in
the main predicative unit with the content
requirement. Because in this sentence, the
meaning of comparison and contrast is stronger,
not quantity-level.
Fourth, compound sentences with subordinate
clauses formed with the help of linking clauses in
scientific style texts belong to the following
groups according to their formal and substantive
structure:
1. Conjunctive sentence with a complementary
adverbial clause: Aytilgan mulohazalardan
anglash mumkinki, ergash gapli qo‘shma gaplarni
o‘rganishda
baribir
sodda
gaplardagi
bo‘laklarning vazifalaridan andoza olgan ma’qul.
(N.Mahmudov)
2. Conjunction with a determining clause: Qaysi
bo‘lak haqida axborot berilishi lozim bo‘lsa, shu
bo‘lak oldin, u haqda axborot beruvchi qism esa
undan keyin keltiriladi. Yopiq jumlada qaysi
bo‘lak mantiqiy urg‘u ostida bo‘lsa, shu bo‘lak
rema, qolgan bo‘laklar tema qism bo‘ladi
(A.Nurmonov).
3. Conjunctive sentences with case adverbs:
Holbuki, adabiyotda faqat vositani ko‘rishlik
qanchalik xato bo‘lsa, unda “sof san’at”nigina
ko‘rish ham shunchalik xatodir. (D.Quronov). Bir
baytning birinchi misrasi necha bo‘g‘im bo‘lsa,
ikkinchi misrasi ham shuncha bo‘g‘im bo‘ladir
(A.Fitrat). Yozuvchining tafakkuri qanchalik keng
bo‘lsa, asarning ko‘lami, salmog‘i “yuki”
shunchalik og‘ir bo‘ladi (A.Xolmurodov).
As can be seen from the above analysis, two types
of adverbial clauses formed with the help of
relative clauses are widely used in scientific texts:
determinative and case adverbial clauses.
Determinative adverbial clauses are also widely
used, mainly the denotative type: Qaysi bo‘lak
emfatik urg‘u olsa, o‘sha bo‘lak ikkinchi marta
takrorlanadi. (A.Nurmatov)
Comparison-comparison of adverbial sentences:
Voqelikdagi hodisalarni ular hayotda qanday
Volume 04 Issue 05-2024
105
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
05
Pages:
102-106
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
(2024:
7.874
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
bo‘lsa o‘shandayligicha ko‘rsatishga intilish
yetakchilik qiladi. (D.Quronov)
Conjunctive sentence with degree-quantity
content: Olim-u mutafakkirlar olami kabirani
qanchalib berilib o‘rgansalar, tirik sayyora
-
yonginamizdagi odamni shunchalik berilib
o‘rganmoqlari,
uning
imkoniyatlaridan
faxrlanishlari lozim. (A.Rasulov)
C
ONCLUSION
In this style of speech, there are almost no clauses
with possessive and participle clauses, and
clauses with complement clauses are also rarely
used. This situation arises from the unique
content structure of scientific texts and the
wealth of concluding thoughts.
R
EFERENCES
1.
Абдураҳмонов Ғ.А. (1958). Қўшма гап
синтаксиси асослари. Т.: ЎзФА нашриёти.
2.
Асқарова М. (1964). Ҳозирги замон ўзбек
тили ва қўшма гаплар. Тошкент.
3.
Бердиалиев А. (1989). Эргаш гапли қўшма
гап
конструкцияларида
семантик
-
сигнификатив парадигматика. Т.: Фан.
4.
Бердиалиев А. (1990). Ўзбек тилида
омоним моделли эргаш гапли қўшма
гаплар. Т.: Фан.
5.
Ғозиев
Ҳ. (1941). Ҳозирги замон ўзбек
адабий тилидаги қўшма гапларнинг
состави ҳақида // Ўзбек тили илмий
грамматикасидан материаллар. Т.: 127
-
156.
6.
Ғуломов
А., Асқарова М. (1987). Ҳозирги
ўзбек адабий тили. Синтаксис. 3
-
нашри. Т.:
Ўқитувчи, 171
-240.
7.
Ейгер Г.В. (1967). Сложные предложения с
совмещением сказуемих в современном
немецком языке. АКД. М.: 5.
8.
Ельмслев Л. (2006). Пролегомены к теории
языка. М.: КомКнига, 108.
9.
Мамажонов А. (1990). Қўшма гап
стилистикаси. Тошкент.
10.
Маҳмудов Н., Нурмонов А. (1995). Ўзбек
тилининг
назарий
грамматикаси.
Синтаксис. Тошкент.
11.
Нурмонов А., Маҳмудов Н., Аҳмедов А.,
Солихўжаев С. (1992). Ўзбек тилининг
мазмуний синтаксиси. Т.: Фан.
12.
Рустамов Х. (1960). Ҳозирги замон ўзбек
тилида тўлдирувчи эргаш гапли қўшма
гаплар. Филол.фан.ном. дис. Тошкент. 293.
13.
Сайфуллаева Р.А. (1994). Ҳозирги ўзбек
тилида қўшма гапларнинг формал
-
функционал талқини. Т.: Фан.
14.
Турниёзов Б.Н. (1972). Ҳозирги ўзбек
тилида тенг компонентли мураккаб
синтактик
қурилмалар
деривацияси:
Филол. Фанлари номзоди. ... дисс. Автореф.
Тошкент.
15.
Тешабоев, Д. Р. (2022). Эргаш гапли
қўшпредикатив бирликлар фалсафий
нарса катагерияси сифатида. Ijtimoiy
fanlarda innovasiya onlayn ilmiy jurnali,
2(11), 25-30.
16.
Тешабоев, Д. Р. (2022). Эргаш гапли
қўшпредикатив бирликлар фалсафий
мазмун категорияси сифатида. Barqarorlik
Volume 04 Issue 05-2024
106
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
05
Pages:
102-106
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
(2024:
7.874
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
va yetakchi tadqiqotlar onlayn ilmiy jurnali,
2(11), 51-55.
17.
Teshboyev, D. R. (2021). On the semantical
analysis of the parypredicative units of
complex following. Theoretical & applied
science, (4), 390-392.
18.
Тешабоев, Д. Р. (2020). Эргаш гапли қўшма
гапларни шакллантиришда антитезанинг
ўрни. Международный журнал искусство
слова, 3(5).
