Authors

  • Shukurova Zulkhumor Bakhtiyarovna
    Doctoral student at Karshi State University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijasr.131755

Keywords:

Metaphor comparative analysis cognitive

Abstract

The article provides a comparative analysis of the metaphors of the Uzbek and Russian languages, identifies their cognitive and pragmatic features, describes specific aspects, and develops the necessary conclusions and recommendations.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 06-2024

90



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

06

Pages:

90-96

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135


















































A

BSTRACT

The article provides a comparative analysis of the metaphors of the Uzbek and Russian languages,
identifies their cognitive and pragmatic features, describes specific aspects, and develops the necessary
conclusions and recommendations.

K

EYWORDS

Metaphor, comparative analysis, cognitive, pragmatic approach, identity, similarity, relativism, difference
and correlation.

I

NTRODUCTION

Language events mostly cases similar will be

some aspects according to languages mutually

differs. A metaphor too everyone in languages

main artistic image tool as is studied. Uzbek and
Russian languages morphological in terms of to

each other if not - at their similar and different

sides a lot A metaphor about the most ancient

theories too today all languages for the same

service is doing Aristotle "... good metaphors

making - analogies is progress," he said too
emphasizes. This to the idea not added some

scientists " every one Leeson in the owner

Journal

Website:

http://sciencebring.co
m/index.php/ijasr

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.

Research Article

METAPHORICAL MEANING OF NOUNS IN LITERARY TEXTS
IN UZBEK AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES


Submission Date:

June 20,

2024,

Accepted Date:

June 25, 2024,

Published Date:

June 30, 2024

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-04-06-15


Shukurova Zulkhumor Bakhtiyarovna

Doctoral student at Karshi State University, Uzbekistan




background image

Volume 04 Issue 06-2024

91



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

06

Pages:

90-96

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































metaphors to apply circle experience there is to

be, Aristotle's this skill in everyone too there is

won't happen said opinion himself not justified,

man speech ability different Leeson of the owners

example under take over to go, of course, in this

she is directly migrations apply experience too
mastering to go about thought said, " metaphor is

life office reach art " - said price will give. O'z

during metaphor learner comparative theory J.

Searle and M. Black by criticism done was J. Searle

metaphor two semantic of meaning verbal, that is

metaphorical expression and exactly has been

contextual be surrounded influence or to the
opposition depends that emphasized. M. Black

while in science from the first be metaphor "

comparison expression doer not on the surface as

a bringer described.

Uzbek and Russian in their languages of

metaphors comparative analysis separately not

studied linguistically event is considered We this

in the article both to the language typical was

similar and unlike to metaphors examples Let's
take : For example, the word " nose ". meanings

metaphorical connection of objects shape and in

space location to similarity based on :

A metaphor is a metaphor created on the basis of

the name of a person and the objects belonging to

him (div part, clothes), such as legs, hands,

mouth, tongue, teeth, ears, sleeves, collar. transfer

of the meaning of lexemes in a metaphorical way

. Among them, Yu.M. Aleksandrova, Yu.V.

Gorshunov J. Darrell emphasizes that the unique

feature of his works is the ability to give vivid
descriptions of animals, using the characteristics

of describing people by comparing the animal

kingdom to human society .

A metaphor of science dependent is an event and

linguistics and literary studies at the intersection

is studied. That's it basically language and literary

a metaphor separate stands Both also a metaphor

in the case one of the object features similarity

principle according to to another is to transfer.
Language point of view in terms of a metaphor of

speech ready is an element ( first in line this of the

tongue usual to the event has become

conversation speech metaphors : the rain it rains

snow it rains conversation take goes and etc. ) and

literature this trope, text of the author in his

imagination created to himself typical image (
heaven the cover of the night in the dome hanging

Metaphor learning in history its turning point a
person to his thinking similarity of reality new

events special to know was the desire. To the

metaphor has been this to look ancient by science


background image

Volume 04 Issue 06-2024

92



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

06

Pages:

90-96

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































Aristotle's in his works present done A metaphor

"... of meaning change with or of sex type or of sex

type or type looking or proportionate in the form

similarity with figuratively words

G. Nasrullayeva stated that it became known that

metaphors are studied in detail in various aspects

in world linguistics. Especially in world

linguistics, metaphors are studied not only in
artistic texts, but also in the case of scientific,

official and journalistic texts. In Uzbek linguistics,

the phenomenon of metaphor in scientific and

scientific popular texts should be specially

investigated .

According to D. Arutyunova according to the

metaphor the following types available : 1)

nominative metaphors (one the meaning to

another from replacement consists of of the name
to be transmitted based on) ; 2) figuratively

metaphors ( transition of person as a result was

born century of predicative and language

figuratively meanings and synonymous tools to

develop determining the meanings that serve ) ;

3) cognitive metaphors (predicative of words

compatibility change and polysemy Create as a
result occurs ) ; 4) common metaphors (of the

word lexicon in the sense of makes sense orders

between boundaries destroy and makes sense of

polysemy encourage emergence ) [7, page 366 ].

A metaphor to the following justification can :

- objects of form Similarity : apple ( fruit ) - apple

( eye ) ;

- something to something relatively two of the

thing in the location Similarity : bow ( animal ) -

bow ( boat, plane ) ;

- evaluation in the structure Similarity : light (

suitcase ) - light ( text, question ) ;

- movement of the idea Similarity : cover get ( tree

div your hands with wrapping take it ) - cover

get ( joy him cover received ) - cover get - 362

watt ( someone public work with cover get ).

- two or from him more than of things of functions

Similarity : apron (apron) - apron ( in the car ) ;

- of colors Similarity : gold ( bracelet ) - gold (

shore ) - gold ( light ). Similarity nature according

to metaphors from differentiation according to

them in the language spread level, in speech

stylistic role with differentiate is more important.
Structure point of view in terms of Russian and

Uzbek in their languages metaphorical

compounds as follows expression possible : 1)

nominative in case mutually depends nouns : the

eyes

stars, hands

ice Uzbek to the


background image

Volume 04 Issue 06-2024

93



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

06

Pages:

90-96

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































language.:- eyes-oh, hand-kind ) ; 2) Adjective

combinations : icy hands, gold hair ; Uzbek to the

language : ( kill hair, packaging hand ) ; 3)

Genitive condition with substantive compounds :

of the hands ice of hair gold, Uzbek in the language

the eye light : ( silk hair, oh eyes, kind hand ) ; 4)
with a subordinate clause verb compounds :

leaves joy with flies, the wind bother does ; Uzbek

to the language : ( sparrows happiness with

leaves rustle sad spilled ). Above emphasizing as

it was, Russian and Uzbek in their languages

metaphor learning principles similar to however

of metaphors essence and typology in
determining some differences there is.

An animal is a person connections a

metaphor and therefore for figuratively in a sense

appear was of people names : baran, osyol, svinya,

lisa, soroka, volk, medved, petukh, vol.

Your property generality of a person feature

that's it such as to the object to transfer possibility

gives : So metaphors they are all in languages

there is.

Metafory v proizvedeniyax S.A. Yesenina

Kudryavy sumrak.

* * *

V sadu gorit koster ryabiny krasnoy.

* * *

Berezovym veselym yazykom.

* * *

Ruki miloy is para lebedey

And golden hair moix nyryayut.

* * *

Ty

moe vasilkovoe slovo,

Ya naveki lyublyu tebya.

Kak jivet teper nasha korova,

Grust solomennuyu terebya?

* * *

"Cheremukha"

Cheremukha shower

S vesnoyu rastsvela

I vetki zolotistye,

Chto kudri, zavila.

A ryadom, it's like a pro

V trave, mejdu corney,


background image

Volume 04 Issue 06-2024

94



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

06

Pages:

90-96

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































Bejit, struitsya malenkiy

Serebryanyy ruchey .

Shaukat Rahman in his poetry sign denoting

action expressive to words when looking a
metaphor harvest in making the horse word

category unproductive is considered So if -

though this about of the poet a metaphor Create

skills, available use style sometimes from others

much difference does :

white silence ports in the morning

day in the light burning

running enters Cold to the city

barefoot green trees.

This is it in verses separate shown two in place a

metaphor participation is doing This instead of
the word " cold ". separately accent to give it is

necessary Because from the context outside Cold

city own in the sense of of temperature extremely

low express too can But in the clause " green trees

", " day in the light on fire the combinations " Cold

of the word metaphorical meaning expressing

coming means The following in verses applied
asov the word while to the stream relatively

portable, simile in the sense of coming : // I forgot

maybe not yet apricot orchard, asov stream,

stream on the out of sight free more grew up

place.// Else one in the poem asov sign denotative

lexeme abstract the horse before come another

one metaphorical meaning represents : // Asov

the heart... follows Andom, ancient out of the way
sadness skirts. Darkness wells how come, how

come trembles was smallpox.// Asov the word to

the stream relatively when used too to the horse

relatively applied bridle that cannot be blocked

which cannot be such as more similar meanings

represents However a poet him to the heart

relatively when using Entirely new meaning to
the poem special content dedicated is standing

This in love take heart situation it 's true

expressing is standing

Saying maybe all in languages a person of the

universe linguistically the scenery own in his

thinking forms It is really ancient values, fathers

and grandfathers lessons, including proverbs,

sayings, wisdom words in epics praise and

exaggerations through learns From metaphors in
use two road available : initial fairy tales and in

legends another creatures and nature events

through people own thoughts they enrich, that is

animals, trees, the universe to their bodies typical

behavior - actions through a person is brought up.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 06-2024

95



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

06

Pages:

90-96

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































The second is to people typical actions, situations,

characteristics through people each other deeper,

clearer understand they get each two in case too

metaphors important tool is considered This in

place, especially to a person characteristic,

characteristics another lifeless to subjects moved
pass more occurs. Russian and Uzbek in the

language metaphors a lot cases to each other like

goes, but to himself typical sides too a lot that it is

emphasis it is necessary ND Arutyunova writes

that "in order to describe the internal,

psychological state, a person takes images from

the outside world . "

As noted by VNTelia, "the meaning of the

metaphor first lies in its ability to serve as a
means of creating a linguistic picture of the world

in statements about it, and then in the thesaurus

of native speakers, which always serves not only

as a repository of these spoken words o "means

themselves, but also their associative forces" .

It is known that the meanings of many

phraseological units are concretized in artistic

speech, because they are used to describe a

certain person, character or to convey the
characteristics of their behavior.

The history of the study of metaphor goes back

many centuries and, as you know, begins with

Aristotle. Philosophers, psychologists, literary

scholars and linguists have attempted to

penetrate into the essence of metaphor and

create its theory. It should be noted that the
attention of researchers in philology is primarily

focused on the following. Metaphorical

combinations in the text and the analysis of the

use of metaphors in the works of writers of the

first decades of the 20th century are especially

often studied, because according to the

observations of researchers, the "metaphorical
style" is one of the important features of the

literature of this period.

C

ONCLUSION

In conclusion, it should be said that in Uzbek and

Russian poetry, there are original metaphors that

are similar to each other and, on the contrary,
there are original metaphors that are not similar

at all. The poetry of Yesenin and Shavkat Rahman

is similar in terms of artistic excellence. These

show how high the artistic potential of both

languages is. Especially, if metaphors in Russian

and Uzbek languages are studied in relation to the


background image

Volume 04 Issue 06-2024

96



International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN

2750-1396)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

06

Pages:

90-96

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.636

)

(2023:

6.741

)

(2024:

7.874

)

OCLC

1368736135















































artistic context, their cognitive-pragmatic aspects

are clearly invisible.

R

EFERENCES

1.

Khojamkulov A. On the classification of

metaphor in the Uzbek language. 20 of the
independence of the Republic of Uzbekistan

¬a collection of scientific articles dedicated to

the year. Linguist. 2 books. ‒ T.: Akademnashr,

2011. ‒ P. 85‒8

8.

2.

Aleksandrov.M., Korjunov.V. // Journal of the

Bashkir University. 2016. vol. 21. No. 3. - p.

698-705.

3.

Beloshapkova, V.A. Sovremennyy russkii

yazyk [Text] / V.A. Beloshapkova.

2-e izd.,

ispr. i dop.

M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1989.

800 p.

4.

Nasrullaeva G. Sociopragmatic characteristics

and lexicographic study of anthropomorphic
metaphors: filol.fan.d-ri diss. -Fergana, 2021. -

p. 37.

5.

Arutyunova ND Metaphor i discourse.

Moscow, 1990. -S. 45.

6.

Telia VN Metaphorization i yeah role and

composition summer y kovoy kartin y mira

Role human factor v yaz y ke : Yaz y k i the
picture mira Moscow, 1988. -S. 56.

References

Khojamkulov A. On the classification of metaphor in the Uzbek language. 20 of the independence of the Republic of Uzbekistan ¬a collection of scientific articles dedicated to the year. Linguist. 2 books. ‒ T.: Akademnashr, 2011. ‒ P. 85‒88.

Aleksandrov.M., Korjunov.V. // Journal of the Bashkir University. 2016. vol. 21. No. 3. - p. 698-705.

Beloshapkova, V.A. Sovremennyy russkii yazyk [Text] / V.A. Beloshapkova. — 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1989. — 800 p.

Nasrullaeva G. Sociopragmatic characteristics and lexicographic study of anthropomorphic metaphors: filol.fan.d-ri diss. -Fergana, 2021. -p. 37.

Arutyunova ND Metaphor i discourse. Moscow, 1990. -S. 45.

Telia VN Metaphorization i yeah role and composition summer y kovoy kartin y mira Role human factor v yaz y ke : Yaz y k i the picture mira Moscow, 1988. -S. 56.