Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
59
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
A
BSTRACT
Educational inclusion, regarded as a guiding philosophy, seeks to ensure that all1 children have access to
education while fostering strategies that advance an inclusive society. This paper underscores the
significance of inclusive pedagogy and child welfare, highlighting the role of an inclusive culture as a
fundamental aspect of delivering quality educational experiences and establishing inclusive institutions.
Such a culture is essential for cultivating a secure and stimulating environment where every individual is
valued, serving as a foundation for the collective success of all community members. It nurtures shared
inclusive values that are instilled in new staff, children, parents, guardians, and local community members.
Given that inclusive culture encompasses both visible and invisible elements, as well as assumptions that
may be recognized or overlooked, it plays a crucial role in facilitating participation while also addressing
issues of exclusion, discrimination, and student isolation. Consequently, the exploration and enhancement
of an inclusive culture within educational institutions necessitate scholarly and professional insights
regarding the importance of integrating all children into the mainstream educational framework. This is
an ongoing process that evolves daily within educational settings, with contributions from all individuals
involved, both directly and indirectly.
K
EYWORDS
Educational inclusion, inclusive culture, school, inclusive education.
I
NTRODUCTION
Journal
Website:
http://sciencebring.co
m/index.php/ijasr
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Research Article
THE ROLE OF AN INCLUSIVE CULTURE AS A KEY ELEMENT IN
ACHIEVING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL INCLUSION
Submission Date:
November 20,
2024,
Accepted Date:
November 25, 2024,
Published Date:
November 30, 2024
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-04-11-10
Gozieva Shakhnoza
PhD student of National Institute of Pedagogy and Character Education named after Kori Niyazi, Uzbekistan
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
60
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
The ongoing transformations brought about by
globalization have significantly influenced
various aspects of society, particularly in
redefining
educational
objectives.
These
transformations underscore the importance of
education that fosters democracy, collaboration,
tolerance, and appreciation for diversity
(Kostović et al., 2011). In contemporary society,
inclusion stands as a fundamental principle of a
democratically oriented framework. It addresses
one of the most pressing issues of our time: the
marginalization of numerous individuals from the
economic, social, political, and cultural spheres of
their communities. The term "inclusion" has
gained prominence alongside the emergence of
the notion of "quality education for all." In this
context, some scholars (Karagiannis, Stainback &
Stainback, 2000) characterize inclusion as a
philosophy rooted in the belief that all individuals
possess equal rights and opportunities. Inclusive
education encompasses the practice of
integrating all children
—
irrespective of their
abilities, challenges, socio-economic status, or
backgrounds
—
into a mainstream educational
system that caters to their unique needs. To
enhance the quality of educational institutions,
fostering an inclusive culture is a critical aspect
(Booth & Aniscow, 2002). The significance of
examining the development of an inclusive
culture highlights not only the undeniable
influence of education on societal culture but also
the necessity of exploring the cross-cultural
characteristics of educational institutions
(Denisova et al., 2019). An inclusive culture
necessitates a well-defined socio-political
orientation that promotes shared value systems.
These values manifest in formal documents,
social initiatives, and the educational process
itself. By advocating for inclusive values, the
capabilities of both society and educational
institutions
are
bolstered,
facilitating
constructive
changes
that
advance
the
development of an inclusive culture within both
schools and society at
large (Ivančić & Stančić,
2013).
In academic discussions, the notion of an
inclusive culture is inherently linked to the
objectives of fostering an inclusive society,
garnering significant interest from numerous
scholars. The Right to Education and the Inclusive
Social Context In the contemporary evolution of
human society, one can observe a shift in the
perceptions of the majority towards various
individuals or social groups, particularly those
with disabilities. Encouragingly, society appears
to be progressing from a history marked by
severe rejection and segregation, through
integration, towards a state of true inclusion. The
rights of children, especially those with
developmental challenges, have captured the
attention of the United Nations (UN) since the
mid-20th century. The Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, which asserts that every
individual has the right to education, was ratified
in 1948. This foundational document paved the
way for a series of international declarations,
conventions, and plans that operationalized
fundamental rights, including those pertaining to
individuals with developmental disabilities. A
pivotal UN document for understanding inclusive
education is the United Nations Convention on
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
61
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
the Rights of the Child (Hrnjica, 2007), which
guarantees rights to all children without
discrimination. The World Declaration on
Education for All (1990) represents the first
international document advocating for a
transformative approach to the educational
system, emphasizing the needs and nature of the
child. The UN standard rules aimed at equalizing
educational opportunities for children with
disabilities affirm the right to education for all
and advocate for education within an "integrative
school environment" in the "regular school
system." To effectively implement these rules, it is
essential to reform the educational system and
the surrounding environment to ensure they are
both acceptable and accessible.
The Salamanca Declaration, adopted by the World
Conference on the Education of Children with
Special Needs in 1994 under the auspices of
UNESCO, asserts that every child possesses
distinct educational requirements and has the
right to attend their local schools. It emphasizes
the necessity for educational systems and
programs to be designed and implemented in a
manner that accommodates the diverse
characteristics and needs of all children.
Specifically, those with special educational needs
should have access to mainstream schools that
embrace
them
within
a
child-centered
educational framework capable of addressing
their unique requirements. Following this
significant advancement in Salamanca, the World
Declaration on Education for All and the
Framework for Action were established in 2000
during the World Forum on Education in Dakar,
where the primary objectives of "Education for
All" were articulated. The foremost goals include
enhancing
and
expanding
educational
opportunities for children, particularly those
from vulnerable and marginalized backgrounds;
ensuring that by 2015, all children are enrolled in
primary education and receive quality, free
primary schooling; and guaranteeing that the
educational needs of all youth and adults are met
equitably. Various international documents
underscore the notion that education is a
fundamental right for all children, prioritizing
quality education and protection against
discrimination in any form, while promoting
respect for diversity. These documents also
highlight the importance of creating an inclusive
school environment that eliminates barriers,
ensuring accessibility for all children from
vulnerable groups, and advocating for a flexible
educational system and curriculum that adapts to
the diverse educational needs of all children,
thereby fostering an inclusive society.
Educators, who are the primary facilitators of this
process, hold a significant and pivotal role in the
implementation of the key areas outlined in
international documents that advocate for
inclusive education. Since 2009, the Republic of
Serbia has emphasized the importance of
fostering inclusion within its educational system
at all levels, leading to the adoption of crucial legal
and strategic frameworks. The Law on the Basics
of the Education System, enacted in 2009 (Sl.
Glasnik, br. 72/09), established that every child is
entitled to basic education, irrespective of
individual differences. This legislation gave rise to
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
62
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
essential regulations aimed at ensuring its
practical application, including the Rulebook on
detailed instructions for determining the right to
an individual educational plan and the Rulebook
on additional educational, health, and social
support for children and students, which
addressed specific areas of concern that had been
identified in practice. Furthermore, the Strategy
for the Development of Education in Serbia until
2020 (Education Development Strategy, 2012)
serves as a vital strategic document that
underscores the enhancement of educational
quality in a comprehensive manner. In particular,
regarding inclusive education, this document
asserts that all children possess the legal right to
receive quality education and upbringing,
regardless of their social, economic, health,
regional, national, linguistic, ethnic, religious, or
other characteristics. Despite the well-
established
normative
frameworks,
the
realization of the right to quality education
remains unfulfilled for all students (Milošević &
Maksimović, 2022). The concept of quality
education is intrinsically linked to the training
and empowerment of teachers, who are pivotal to
all educational reforms. The extent to which
teachers are equipped, trained, and made aware
of inclusive practices directly influences the
achievement of the objectives outlined in both
international and national documents. The
significance of these factors is supported by
numerous studies conducted in both domestic
and international contexts. Inclusion in Education
Inclusion can be interpreted in various ways,
contingent upon the context and the stakeholders
involved; however, it is fundamentally a complex
phenomenon that has become a moral imperative
within educational institutions. In a broader
context, inclusion encompasses the processes
that enable every individual, irrespective of their
experiences and life circumstances, to realize
their full potential (Mišković, 2013). Key
elements of an inclusive society include the
reduction of inequality, enhancement of social
cohesion, and a balance between individual rights
and responsibilities. Within the educational
framework, inclusion is understood more
narrowly as a facet of an inclusive society, where
children can participate and contribute
regardless of their gender, abilities, ethnicity, or
challenges. The core objective of an inclusive
education system is to broaden access to
education for every child while simultaneously
fostering an environment conducive to quality
education that aligns with each child's needs and
capabilities. In professional literature, this child-
centered approach to education, which
emphasizes rights and specific needs, is referred
to as inclusive education (Muškinja et al., 2011).
In academic discourse, there exists a diverse
array of definitions pertaining to inclusive
education, highlighting the absence of a unified
consensus among scholars and a universally
accepted definition of inclusion. Various authors,
such as Ilić (2009), have explored
the concept of
inclusion from multiple perspectives, and its
interpretation has evolved over time. Inclusion is
fundamentally characterized by a sense of
belonging rather than mere physical proximity,
which was the primary focus of the earlier
concept of "mainstreaming." It encompasses the
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
63
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
idea that children of varying abilities engage in
learning, play, and work collaboratively. The
success of inclusion is evident in the active
participation of all children, ensuring their access
to play and work environments, as well as
providing them with choices. It is essential to
recognize that inclusion is a process rather than a
fixed
location,
necessitating
collective
responsibility from the broader social community
(Inclusion Resources for Early Childhood
Professionals, 1997). Stubbs (2009) articulates
inclusive education as the provision of
appropriate, relevant, accessible, and effective
educational opportunities for all children within
their communities. This educational journey
commences in the family setting and
encompasses both formal and informal
educational initiatives within the community.
According to Rouse and Florian (1996), an
inclusive school is one that confronts the
challenges of diversity with a collective mission
focused on learning for every studen
t. Suzić
(2008) identifies three approaches to defining
inclusion: as a broad concept and process, as
inclusive upbringing and education, and as a
compassionate approach to integrating children
with special needs into mainstream schools and
society. In its most comprehensive sense,
inclusive education pertains to the practice of
integrating all students, irrespective of their
abilities, challenges, socio-economic status, or
background, into regular schools and classrooms
that can adequately address their individual
needs (Karagiannis, Stainback & S.)
Inclusion refers to the commitment to provide
optimal educational opportunities for every child
within a school or classroom setting. This entails
offering support services tailored to the child
rather than removing the child from such
services. The goal of inclusive education is to
guarantee that all children within their
communities have access to suitable, relevant,
and effective educational experiences (Oljača &
Kostović, 2014). Ensuring quality education for
all necessitates the successful integration of
children with developmental disabilities into the
mainstream education system. This integration
requires that kindergartens and schools be
adapted to meet the needs of each individual, as
the educational framework should be inclusive of
all children. Inclusive education focuses on
addressing the needs of the child within the
educational process, emphasizing the adaptation
of the school curriculum rather than the child
themselves. This approach enables individuals
with developmental disabilities to engage fully in
community life, promoting tolerance and respect
within the broader society, where every
individual deserves recognition and acceptance
as a human being. Through inclusive education, a
societal philosophy emerges that upholds the
principle of equal rights for all individuals,
irrespective of their differences, acknowledging
that such differences are a natural aspect of
human existence (Cerić, 2004). Inclusion should
be viewed as an ongoing endeavor to discover
improved methods for addressing diversity
within the contemporary educational paradigm.
The effective implementation of inclusion
necessitates systemic changes in programs,
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
64
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
methodologies, expectations, and various other
elements. Both the implicit and explicit school
curricula can play a significant role in fostering an
inclusive school environment, influencing the
overall ethos of the institution, the attitudes and
beliefs of educators, the prevailing culture, and
the teaching methods employed.
n contemporary educational practices, an
inclusive culture is particularly prominent,
emphasizing the respect for the diversity of all
children within the educational framework
(Education for All). According to UNESCO (2004),
Education for All is a key priority in educational
initiatives, targeting all children and highlighting
the necessity of inclusion in educational settings
(Booth & Ainscow, 2002). This approach ensures
that all members of the social community have
equal rights to education, irrespective of their
national, religious, cultural, social, or other
diverse identities (Ivančić & Stančić, 2013). The
concept of an inclusive culture in this context
primarily pertains to fostering a value system
within the school community that embraces and
supports diversity, often referred to as "inclusive
values." This aspect contributes to the
development of a safe and encouraging
environment that promotes acceptance and
collaboration, where every individual is valued,
thereby laying the groundwork for the highest
achievements of all community members. The
inclusive evolution of a school is characterized by
an ongoing process that involves consistent
modifications in organizational structure,
teaching methodologies, and pedagogical
strategies, as well as transformations in the
professional development of educators (Booth &
Ainscow, 2002). Numerous studies underscore
the significance of school culture in enhancing the
quality of educational practices (McLaughlin &
Talbert, 2006; Opfer & Pedder, 2011). Through an
inclusive culture, educators can celebrate
individual differences, foster democratic values,
and cultivate a sense of community, cultural
awareness, and mutual support among students
(Smith & Barr, 2008).
The establishment of an inclusive climate and
culture is essential, but the ongoing professional
development of teachers is equally crucial for the
effective implementation of inclusive education.
The success of inclusive education largely hinges
on a teacher's capacity to acknowledge the
personal and social significance of students
requiring additional support, as well as their
commitment to ensuring the quality of the
educational process (Allday et al., 2013; Milošević
& Maksimović, 2022). Consequently, while the
quality of teaching is vital, it represents only one
aspect necessary for fostering inclusive school
practices. The advancement of such practices can
only occur in conjunction with the development
of inclusive policies and a supportive culture,
necessitating a (re)orientation towards inclusive
values at the levels of the school, the educational
system, and the broader social context (Ratković,
Hebib & Šaljić, 2017). Given the complexity of
educational institutions, the quality of school
practices is influenced by various factors,
including the characteristics and operational
methods of the institution itself, as well as those
of the educational and social systems at large.
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
65
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
Therefore, when evaluating the inclusivity of a
school, it is imperative to consider all dimensions
of inclusiveness, rather than focusing solely on
the practices of the institution. The publication
"Index for Inclusion" identifies three key
dimensions of an inclusive school: inclusive
policy, inclusive culture, and inclusive practice
(Booth & Ainscow, 2002). The first two
dimensions serve as a framework for
development and are prerequisites for the
establishment of effective inclusive practices
within schools. School culture is a concept that
originates from the broader idea of organizational
culture, which encompasses the characteristics of
an organization that influence the behaviors and
actions of its members, maintain stability and
order within the organization, foster commitment
among its members towards achieving
organizational goals, and enhance overall
productivity (Hebib & Žunić
Pavlović, 2018). The
various components and elements that constitute
school culture can be examined at multiple levels:
the first level includes the visible elements of the
school's structure and the processes involved in
school life and operations; the second level
encompasses the shared system of values and
beliefs that inform the school's approach and
strategies; the third level pertains to the
perceptions, opinions, and emotions of those
involved in school activities, which form the basis
for their actions and the values they embrace
(Hebib, Antonijević & Ratković, 2019). By
building on the definitions of school culture and
inclusive school culture, we can more precisely
identify, monitor, and analyze this phenomenon
through several key elements: the degree of
shared commitment among school staff towards
inclusive education; the level of acceptance of the
philosophy and core values of inclusive education
by school personnel; the attitudes of practitioners
regarding inclusive education; and the overall
school climate, which reflects the environment in
which educational activities occur. The quality
and extent of cooperative relationships and
teamwork within the school, as well as between
the school, students' parents, and the local
community, are crucial. This includes the degree
of involvement of all stakeholders in educational
and
school-related
activities.
Effective
communication is one of the most significant
strategies for establishing a robust and
supportive school network. It is essential to
communicate
efficiently,
promptly,
and
frequently (Chen, 2019). Transparent, open,
honest, and timely communication among school
leaders, staff, students, families, and between
students themselves is critical for fostering a
positive school environment. School leadership
must
prioritize
the
development
of
communication channels and standards, which
may involve utilizing digital platforms and
applications to facilitate interactions between
parents and teachers. A school that encourages
feedback and dialogue creates an atmosphere
where everyone feels secure, included, and
empowered to express their opinions. Inclusive
educational institutions offer formal avenues for
staff, students, and families to provide feedback
and suggestions, ensuring that their voices are
acknowledged and acted upon. Changing
organizational culture presents significant
challenges. It is important to identify the barriers
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
66
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
that
school
systems
encounter
during
organizational transformations.
Numerous factors contribute to the challenges
faced in implementing change, including the
unsuccessful outcomes of prior initiatives,
insufficient funding for even basic educational
requirements, and a lack of leadership in
fostering cultural competence. It is crucial to have
community mobilization, effective leadership,
and organized community efforts (Dessel, 2010).
The Teacher's Role in Advancing Inclusive
Education Despite the fact that inclusion has been
a focal point of international educational policy
for the past thirty years and is regarded as a
significant reform objective, the journey toward
inclusive education is fraught with skepticism,
uncertainty,
and
divergent
viewpoints.
Nevertheless, there exists robust support for
inclusion and the attainment of social objectives
related
to
education
and
upbringing,
accompanied by a highly favorable attitude
among participants in the educational process.
Furthermore, it has been observed that the
awareness of teachers and the enhancement of
their professional competencies are outcomes of
working within an inclusive setting (Begeny &
Martens, 2007; Waldron & McLeskey, 2010).
Conversely, critics of inclusive education argue
that the mainstream education system is ill-
equipped to implement inclusion effectively and
that achieving this goal poses considerable
challenges. Tensions inevitably arise at three
levels of the educational framework: the macro
level concerning the overall educational system,
the organizational level of individual schools, and
the personal level of individual educators
(Đermanov et al., 2012).
The establishment of
inclusive education systems, as guided by
international agreements and conventions, has
introduced new responsibilities for teachers in
mainstream schools. Recognizing teachers as
pivotal figures in inclusive educational practices,
gaining insight into their perspectives is essential
for enhancing the quality of inclusive teaching.
Countries aiming to enhance the quality of
educational inclusion within mainstream schools,
while honoring their unique social and cultural
contexts, should examine teachers' perceptions of
various facets of inclusive education, as well as
their self-assessment of competencies for
functioning in an inclusive environment
(Knežević Florić et al., 2018). The effectiveness of
inclusive education and the quality of inclusive
practices necessitate ongoing evaluation of
multiple factors. Numerous empirical studies
have demonstrated the influence of teachers'
professional competencies, developed during
their initial training, alongside their increased
willingness
to
engage
in
professional
development programs tailored for inclusive
classrooms. Presently, educators encounter
increasingly complex demands and expectations
from various stakeholders in the education
sector, including parents and the growing
number of students requiring inclusion. A
particularly delicate aspect of inclusive education
involves
teaching
in
classrooms
that
accommodate children with developmental
disabilities and learning challenges. Supporting
the development and academic achievement of
each child in most primary schools poses a
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
67
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
significant challenge for teachers, given the
constraints of limited material, spatial, and
personnel resources, the criteria for categorizing
students as inclusive, the frequent absence of
pedagogical assistants, and the unplanned nature
of teachers' professional development. The
attitudes of all participants in the educational
process are crucial for the success of inclusion,
with teachers' attitudes being particularly
influential, as they significantly impact the
effectiveness of inclusive practices within schools
(Avramidis et al., 2000; Hrnjica, 2007; Suzić,
2007).
Research indicates that teachers who possess a
positive outlook, along with practical experience
in executing inclusive programs and formal
qualifications obtained through in-service
training (INSET), demonstrate significantly
greater enthusiasm and preparedness for
ongoing professional development. This finding
underscores the importance of enhancing teacher
competencies and validates the efforts that have
been made thus far. As a result, it is imperative to
focus on the sensitization and professional
training of educators for inclusive schooling. It is
well-established
that
the
successful
implementation, impact, and sustainability of
inclusive practices are heavily reliant on teachers'
acceptance of inclusion, as well as on the design
of initial teacher education and subsequent
professional development programs (Avramidis
et al., 2000; Vujačić, 2005; Subban & Sharma,
2006). Discussion: The school operates within the
broader societal context, and thus, its culture will
inherently reflect the prevailing social values. The
school functions as a temporal culture,
characterized by the specific times at which its
members arrive and depart, and is spatially
confined to its buildings and grounds. It serves as
a platform for the negotiation and continual
redefinition of shared values, assumptions, and
beliefs, which are expressed and enacted
collectively. To enhance the inclusivity of schools,
it is essential to reflect on the fundamental values
that underpin the school culture and to
collaboratively investigate, negotiate, and
experiment with how these values are manifested
within the educational environment. While the
organization of a school is shaped by broader
social structures, it possesses unique emergent
properties that allow it to evolve in response to its
internal dynamics. Changes in school culture can
occur when uncertainties in practices and policies
are addressed by assertive and dedicated
individuals
who
successfully
encourage
themselves and others to embrace new practices
that foster transformation. Consequently, the
staff has the potential to reorganize the school to
better serve the needs of its students. Achieving
this will necessitate effective communication,
collaborative problem-solving, and mutual
respect among staff members and students alike.
Educators will need to transcend the limitations
of conventional school structures and practices.
A
contemporary
educational
institution
necessitates a novel approach to leadership and
management, characterized by the integration of
changes and innovations across material,
organizational, programmatic, and personnel
frameworks. The practical application of inclusive
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
68
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
education within the school environment is a
daily responsibility shared by all stakeholders
involved in the educational process. The
foundation of an inclusive school culture is rooted
in the recognition and appreciation of diversity,
which serves as a motivating factor in the work
undertaken. Inclusion does not imply the
homogenization of differences; rather, it
emphasizes the importance of respecting
individual distinctions. The significance of
educational inclusion lies in facilitating the
acquisition of knowledge, skills, and life
competencies tailored to the unique abilities of
each individual. Furthermore, developing
competencies for implementing inclusion within
the school setting is essential for the effective
management of a modern educational institution.
An inclusive culture serves as a crucial
pedagogical aspect of effective educational
inclusion, fostering a secure and engaging
community characterized by acceptance and
collaboration, where every individual is valued.
This environment lays the groundwork for the
optimal achievements of all members within the
community. It cultivates shared inclusive values
that are imparted to new staff, students, parents,
and school administrators alike. The principles
and values inherent in an inclusive school culture
inform decision-making regarding school policies
and influence daily practices within classrooms,
ensuring that the development of the school is an
ongoing endeavor.
R
EFERENCES
1.
Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000).
A Survey into mainstream teachers attitude
towards the inclusion of children with special
educational needs in the ordinary school in
one local educationauthority. Educational
Psychology,
20,
191-211.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713663717
2.
Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2007).
Inclusionary education in Italy: A literature
review and call for more empirical research.
Remedial and special education, 28(2), 80-94.
3.
Booth, T., & Aniscow, M. (2002). Index for
Inclusion:
Developing
Learning
and
Participation in Schools. Bristol: CSIE (Center
for Studies in Inclusive Educat
ion). Cerić, H.
(2004)
4.
Definiranje inkluzivnog obrazovanja. Naša
škola, 87
-95 Chen, Y. (2019). Exploring the
Role of Communication in Inclusive Education
for Children with Learning Disabilities.
Advances in Social Science, Education and
Humanities Research, 350, 296-298.
5.
Dakar Framework for Action (2000).
6.
Education For All: Meeting Our Collective
Commitments, World Education Forum in
Dakar April 26-28. Denisova, O., Lekhanova,
O., Ponikarova, V., & Gudina, T. (2019).
7.
Inclusive culture of kindergarten, school,
college and university teachers. In SHS Web of
Conferences.Vol. 70, p. 10002).
8.
EDP
Sciences.
https://
doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197010002
Dessel, A. (2010). Prejudice in Schools:
Promotion of an Inclusive Culture and
Climate. Education and Urban Society, 20(10),
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
69
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
1-
23. Knežević
-
Florić, O., Ninković, S., i Tančić,
D. N. (2018).
9.
Inkluzivno obrazovanje iz perspektive
nastavnika-uloge, kompetencije i barijere.
Nastava i vaspitanje, 67(1), 7-22.
10.
Đermanov J., Kosanović M., Đukić, M. i
Stanić,
D. (2012). Spremnost osnovnoškolskih
nastavnika na stručno usavršavanje i stavovi
prema inkluziji. U: Đukić, M. (ur.) Tematski
zbornik: Inkluzivno obrazovanje: obrazovanje
za sve. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.15-
41 Ilić,
M. (2009).
11.
Odgojno-obrazovni efekti inkluzivne nastave.
Educational
Sciences/Odgojne
Znanosti,
11(2). Ivančić, Đ., & Stančić, Z. (2013).
12.
Stvaranje inkluzivne kulture škole. Hrvatska
Revija za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja,
49(2),139-157.
13.
Karagiannis, A., Stainback, W., Stainback, S.
(2000): Rationale for Inclusive Schooling, in:
W. Stainback, S. Stainback (Eds.) Inclusion: A
Guide for Educators. Baltimore: Brookes
Publishing Co 528 Kostović, S., Milutinović,
14.
J., Zuković, S., Borovica, T., i Lungulov, B.
(2011).
15.
Razvoj inkluzivne obrazovne prakse u
školskom
kontekstu.
U:
Inkluzivno
obrazovanje: od pedagoške koncepcije do
prakse. Tematski zbornik. Filozofski fakultet,
Novi Sad 1-17. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J.
E. (2006).
16.
Building school-based teacher learning
communities: Professional strategies to
improve student achievement (Vol. 45).
Teachers College Press. Milošević, D., &
Maksimović, J. (2022).
17.
Inkluzivno obrazovanje u Republici Srbiji iz
ugla nastavnika razredne i predmetne
nastave-kompetencije, prednosti, barijere i
preduslovi. Nastava i vaspitanje, 71(1), 7-27.
Mišković, M. (2013).
18.
Ka sociološkom utemeljenju inkluzivnog
obrazovanja. Krugovi detinjstva, 1(1-2), 7-15.
Muškinja, O., Lazić, S., & Rista, S. (2011).
19.
Inkluzija između želje i mogućnosti.
Pokrajinski ombudsman AP Vojvodine. Hebib,
E., Antonijević, R. i Ratković, M. (
2019).
20.
Odlike i pretpostavke razvoja inkluzivne
školske prakse. Nastava i vaspitanje, 68(3),
315-
329. Hebib, E. i Žunić Pavlović, V. (2018).
21.
Školska klima i školska kultura: okvir za
izgradnju škole kao bezbedne i podsticajne
sredine za učenje i
razvoj. Zbornik Instituta za
pedagoška istraživanja, 50(1), 113
-134.
22.
Hrnjica S. (2007): Škola po meri deteta –
Priručnik za rad sa učenicima redovne škole
koji imaju teškoće u razvoju, kao deo projekta
Inkluzija učenika sa teškoćama u razvoju u
redovn
e osnovne škole, Beograd: Ministarstvo
prosvete i sporta Republike Srbije. Ratković,
M., Hebib, E. i Šaljić, Z. (2017).
23.
Inkluzija u obrazovanju kao cilj i sadržaj
reformi savremenih školskih sistema. Nastava
i vaspitanje, 66(3), 437-450.
24.
Rouse, M., & Florian, L. (1996). Effective
inclusive schools: a study in two countries.
Cambridge journal of education, 26(1), 71-85.
25.
Smith, R., & Barr, S. (2008). Towards
educational inclusion in a contested society:
From critical analysis to creative action.
International Journal of Inclusive Education,
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
70
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
59-70
OCLC
–
1368736135
12(4),
401-422.
https://doi.
org/10.1080/13603110601145775
26.
Strategija razvoja obrazovanja u Srbiji do
2020. godine. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 107/2012.
Stubbs, S. (2009).
27.
Attitudes of general education teachers in
grades one through six toward inclusion in
New Providence, Bahamas. The George
Washington University. Subban, P., & Sharma,
U. (2006).
28.
Teachers’ perceptions of inclusive education
in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of
Special Education, 21(1), 42-
52. Suzić, N.
(2008).
29.
Uvod u inkluziju. Banja Luka: XBS UNESCO
(1990).
30.
World declaration on education for all and
framework for action to meet basic learning
needs. In World Conference on Education for
All: Meeting Basic Learning Needs, Jomtien,
Thailand, 5
–
9 March 1990. New York: Inter-
Agency Commission (UNDP, UNESCO,
UNICEF, World Bank) for the World
Conference on Education for All. UNESCO
(1994)
31.
The
UNESCO
Salamanca
Statement
andFramework for Action on Special Needs
Educatio
n.Paris: UNESCO Velišek
-
Braško, O.
(2015).
32.
Inkluzivno-obrazovna politika u Evropi i
regionu. Sociološki pregled, 49(1), 95
- 108.
https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg1501095V
Vujačić, M. (2005).
33.
Inkluzivno obrazovanje
–
teorijske osnove i
praktična
real
izacija.
Nastava
i
vaspitanje,54(4-5),
483-496.
Zakon
o
osnovama sistema obrazovanja i vaspitanja.
Službeni glasnik RS, br. 72/09
