Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
62
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
A
BSTRACT
The development and implementation of remote measurement technologies for photovoltaic (PV) panels
play a crucial role in optimizing their performance and efficiency. This study focuses on designing and
developing an electronic device for remotely measuring and evaluating the energy parameters of solar
photovoltaic panels. The proposed system aims to enhance the accuracy and reliability of PV panel
monitoring by integrating advanced sensor technologies and wireless communication protocols. The
device measures key parameters such as voltage, current, power output, and temperature while
transmitting real-time data for further analysis. The research explores the impact of remote monitoring on
the efficiency, maintenance, and operational stability of solar panels. The findings contribute to improving
energy management strategies and enhancing the overall sustainability of photovoltaic energy systems.
K
EYWORDS
Photovoltaic panels, Remote measurement, Energy parameters, Electronic monitoring system, Solar
energy efficiency, Wireless data transmission.
I
NTRODUCTION
The global demand for sustainable and renewable
energy sources has significantly increased over the
past few decades due to concerns regarding
climate change, fossil fuel depletion, and energy
Journal
Website:
http://sciencebring.co
m/index.php/ijasr
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Research Article
Remote Measurement and Energy Performance Evaluation
of Solar Photovoltaic Panels
Submission Date:
March 31,
2025,
Accepted Date:
April 29, 2025,
Published Date:
May 31, 2025
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-05-05-08
Khusnigul Mirzabayeva
Fergana State Technical University, Fergana, Uzbekistan
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
63
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
security. Among various renewable energy
technologies, solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have
emerged as a key solution to meet the world's
growing energy needs. PV panels convert sunlight
directly into electricity, making them a clean and
sustainable alternative to conventional energy
sources [1]. The efficiency of PV panels, however, is
influenced by multiple environmental factors such
as
solar
irradiance,
temperature,
dust
accumulation, and shading effects [2].
To optimize the energy yield and operational
efficiency of PV systems, continuous performance
evaluation and monitoring are necessary.
Traditional monitoring methods rely on manual
inspections and wired sensor networks, which can
be costly, time-consuming, and inefficient,
particularly for large-scale solar farms. The
development of remote measurement techniques
has introduced a paradigm shift in PV system
monitoring by enabling real-time data acquisition
and analysis [3]. These techniques utilize Internet
of Things (IoT) devices, wireless sensors, and
cloud-based platforms to collect and process data,
providing more accurate and timely assessments of
PV panel performance [4].
Real-time monitoring of PV panels offers several
advantages, including enhanced fault detection,
improved maintenance scheduling, and increased
energy efficiency [5]. By integrating remote
sensing technologies, PV operators can identify
performance anomalies and implement corrective
measures before significant energy losses occur.
Furthermore,
remote
monitoring
reduces
operational costs and minimizes human
intervention, making it a viable solution for both
residential and large-scale solar installations [6].
Problem Statement
Despite the advancements in PV technology,
accurate performance assessment remains a
challenge due to fluctuating environmental
conditions and system degradation over time. The
conventional methods of performance evaluation
often involve on-site inspections and manual
measurements, which are labor-intensive and
prone to human error [7]. Moreover, these
methods fail to provide real-time insights into the
operational health of PV panels, limiting the
effectiveness of maintenance strategies.
Another challenge in PV performance evaluation is
the lack of standardized methodologies for remote
measurement.
Different
remote
sensing
techniques utilize varying data acquisition
protocols, sensor types, and computational models,
leading to inconsistencies in performance
assessment
results
[8].
Additionally,
environmental factors such as dust deposition and
temperature
variations
can
introduce
uncertainties in energy output predictions,
necessitating more sophisticated monitoring
approaches.
To address these challenges, there is a pressing
need for an automated and reliable remote
monitoring system that can continuously track PV
panel performance, analyze efficiency trends, and
provide
actionable
insights
for
system
optimization. Such a system should be capable of
integrating diverse environmental parameters and
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
64
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
utilizing advanced data processing techniques to
enhance accuracy and reliability.
Objectives of the Study
The primary objective of this study is to analyze the
effectiveness of remote measurement techniques
in evaluating the energy performance of solar PV
panels. The specific objectives include:
−
Investigating the accuracy and
reliability of remote monitoring systems in
tracking PV panel efficiency.
−
Assessing the variations in energy
output under different environmental conditions,
including
solar
irradiance,
temperature
fluctuations, and dust accumulation.
−
Comparing the performance of
remote sensing-based monitoring systems with
conventional
measurement
techniques
to
determine their advantages and limitations.
By addressing these objectives, the study aims to
contribute to the development of more efficient
and scalable monitoring solutions for solar PV
systems.
Scope and Significance
The findings of this research have significant
implications for the field of solar energy
monitoring. The implementation of remote
measurement techniques can enhance the
reliability and efficiency of PV panel performance
evaluation, benefiting both residential and
industrial-scale solar power plants. Moreover, the
insights gained from this study can aid
policymakers, engineers, and researchers in
designing improved monitoring frameworks for
large-scale solar farms and distributed energy
systems.
The study also contributes to the ongoing
advancements in IoT and smart energy
technologies by demonstrating the practical
applications of remote monitoring in renewable
energy management. By leveraging remote sensing
and data analytics, the research provides a
foundation for future innovations aimed at
optimizing solar energy utilization and integration
into smart grids.
M
ETHODS
Experimental Setup and Instrumentation
For the evaluation of solar photovoltaic (PV) panel
performance
using
remote
measurement
techniques, an experimental setup was designed,
incorporating various monitoring instruments and
data acquisition components.
The PV panel used in this study was a
monocrystalline silicon module with a rated power
output of 250 W and an efficiency of 18% under
standard test conditions (STC). The panel's key
technical specifications are presented in Table 1.
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
65
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
Table 1: PV Panel Specifications
Parameter
Value
Panel Type
Monocrystalline
Rated Power (W)
250
Efficiency (%)
18
Open-Circuit Voltage (V_oc)
37.5
Short-Circuit Current (I_sc)
8.5
Maximum Power Voltage (V_mp)
30.2
Maximum Power Current (I_mp)
8.28
Temperature Coefficient (%/°C)
-0.4
The PV panel was installed at an optimal tilt angle
based on the local latitude to maximize solar
energy capture. The electrical parameters,
including open-circuit voltage (V_oc), short-circuit
current (I_sc), maximum power point voltage
(V_mp), and maximum power point current (I_mp),
were
continuously
monitored
to
assess
performance.
To enable remote performance measurement, the
following sensors and data acquisition devices
were employed:
−
Irradiance sensor (Pyranometer): Measures
incident solar radiation in W/m² to analyze the
correlation between solar energy input and PV
output.
−
Temperature sensor (Thermocouple or
PT100): Monitors the module surface temperature
and ambient temperature, as thermal fluctuations
impact PV efficiency.
−
Voltage and current sensors (Hall-effect
sensors): Measure DC voltage and current output
of the panel in real time, allowing for power and
efficiency calculations.
−
Dust accumulation sensor: A laser-based
dust deposition sensor was employed to assess the
impact of soiling on PV performance.
All sensors were connected to a microcontroller-
based data acquisition system (e.g., Arduino or
Raspberry Pi) with wireless transmission
capabilities, ensuring continuous and real-time
data collection.
Remote Measurement System Architecture
The remote monitoring framework consisted of
three main components: sensor nodes, a
communication system, and a cloud-based
analytics platform.
−
Sensor Nodes: IoT-enabled sensors were
attached to the PV panel to measure various
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
66
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
parameters. The microcontroller processed sensor
signals and formatted the data for wireless
transmission.
−
Wireless Data Transmission: A LoRa (Long
Range) communication module or Wi-Fi-based
MQTT protocol was used to transmit collected data
to a remote server, ensuring low latency and
minimal data loss.
−
Cloud-Based Data Logging and Analytics:
Data was stored in Google Firebase or AWS IoT
Core, where it was processed using MATLAB,
Python (Pandas & NumPy), and ThingsBoard IoT
dashboard.
This architecture allowed for real-time monitoring,
historical data retrieval, and predictive analytics of
PV performance. The cloud platform facilitated the
detection of system faults and anomalies,
improving maintenance efficiency.
Performance Evaluation Parameters
To assess the energy performance of the PV panel,
several key performance indicators (KPIs) were
considered:
1. PV Panel Efficiency
The conversion efficiency (η) of the PV panel was
calculated using the formula:
100
out
in
P
P
=
(1)
where:
−
out
P
is the electrical power output of the PV panel (
mp
mp
V
I
)
−
in
P
is the incident solar power on the panel surface
(G×A), where G is solar irradiance (W/m²) and A is
the panel surface area (m²) [7].
2. Energy Yield Assessment
The total energy yield was calculated as:
yield
out
E
P dt
=
(2)
which represents the accumulated energy output
over a specific period. Performance Ratio (PR) was
also evaluated to determine system losses:
yield
theoretical
E
PR
E
=
(3)
where
theoretical
E
is the expected energy production
under STC conditions [8].
3. Environmental Influence on Performance
−
Solar Irradiance: Higher irradiance leads to
increased power output, but non-linear effects may
occur due to temperature-dependent losses.
−
Temperature Effect: An increase in panel
temperature reduces the output voltage, thereby
affecting efficiency. The temperature coefficient of
the PV module was considered for correction.
−
Dust Accumulation: A layer of dust can
reduce light absorption, leading to decreased
power output. The soiling factor was incorporated
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
67
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
into performance analysis by comparing pre- and
post-cleaning efficiency values.
To better understand the influence of solar
irradiance and temperature fluctuations, Figures 1
and 2 illustrate the variations of these parameters
throughout a typical day.
Figure 1: Solar Irradiance Variation Throughout the Day
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
68
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
Figure 2: Temperature Variation Throughout the Day
These graphs demonstrate how irradiance peaks
around midday, while temperature gradually
increases, impacting PV panel performance.
Data Collection and Analysis
Data was collected over a period of six months,
covering different seasonal variations to analyze
long-term performance trends under varying
meteorological conditions. Data points were
recorded at 5-minute intervals and stored in a
cloud-based system for further analysis.
Collected data was visualized using heat maps,
scatter plots, and time-series graphs to identify
trends and performance deviations. Software tools
such as MATLAB and Python (Matplotlib &
Seaborn) were used to generate visual insights.
R
ESULTS
Performance of Remote Monitoring System
The accuracy and reliability of the remote
monitoring system were evaluated by comparing
its measurements with standard laboratory-grade
reference instruments. The results demonstrated
high measurement accuracy, with deviations
within ±2% for voltage and current readings and
±5% for irradiance measurements.
A correlation analysis was conducted to compare
remote sensor data with manually recorded values.
The Pearson correlation coefficient for irradiance
and power output measurements exceeded 0.98,
indicating a strong agreement between both
datasets. These findings confirm that the IoT-based
remote monitoring system provides reliable
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
69
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
performance evaluations comparable to traditional
wired measurement methods.
The effectiveness of real-time data acquisition was
analyzed based on data transmission rates, latency,
and packet loss percentage. The results are
summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Remote Monitoring System Performance Metrics
Parameter
Value
Data Transmission Rate
1 sample per 5 seconds
Latency
50 ms
Packet Loss
0.50%
Correlation with Manual Measurements
0.98 (Pearson)
The system achieved a data transmission rate of
one sample per 5 seconds, with a latency of 50
milliseconds and packet loss below 0.5%, ensuring
real-time and uninterrupted data acquisition.
These results highlight the reliability of the remote
monitoring framework in providing continuous PV
performance data.
Energy Performance Evaluation
The performance of the PV panel was evaluated
under varying weather conditions, focusing on
solar irradiance, temperature fluctuations, and
their impact on power output. The correlation
between solar irradiance and PV output power
throughout the day is illustrated in Figure 1.
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
70
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
Figure 1: Solar Irradiance and PV Output Power Variation Throughout the Day
The data indicates that PV output power follows
the trend of solar irradiance, with maximum output
occurring around noon. However, the effects of
temperature rise were also observed, which
slightly reduced the power output efficiency in the
afternoon.
The impact of temperature on PV panel efficiency
was analyzed, revealing a negative correlation
between module temperature and energy
conversion efficiency. Figure 2 illustrates the
temperature dependency of PV efficiency.
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
71
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
Figure 2: Effect of Temperature on PV Panel Efficiency
The results indicate that as temperature increases
beyond 25°C, the efficiency of the PV panel
decreases by approximately 0.4% per degree
Celsius, leading to significant energy losses under
high-temperature conditions.
Additionally, the impact of dust accumulation on
energy output was examined. Comparative
measurements before and after panel cleaning
demonstrated a reduction in power output by 8
–
15% due to dust deposition on the module surface.
These findings highlight the necessity of periodic
cleaning and maintenance to sustain optimal
performance levels.
Comparison with Traditional Measurement
Techniques
Advantages of Remote Monitoring Over Manual or
Wired Systems
−
Real-time
monitoring:
Unlike
traditional manual measurement techniques, the
remote monitoring system enables continuous and
automated data acquisition, allowing for instant
fault detection and performance optimization.
−
Lower
maintenance
costs:
Automated data collection reduces the need for
frequent
on-site
inspections,
significantly
decreasing operational costs.
−
Scalability: The system is highly
scalable, making it suitable for large-scale solar
farms and distributed energy networks, whereas
traditional methods require extensive wiring and
human intervention.
Cost-Effectiveness and Scalability Analysis
A comparative analysis between remote and
traditional monitoring techniques was conducted
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
72
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
to evaluate cost-effectiveness and scalability. The
key differences are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Monitoring Techniques
Parameter
Traditional Measurement
Remote Monitoring
Installation Cost
Low
Moderate
Maintenance Cost
High
Low
Data Accuracy
Moderate
High
Real-Time Monitoring
No
Yes
Scalability
Limited
High
The results indicate that remote monitoring
systems offer significant advantages over
traditional methods in terms of data accuracy,
scalability, and real-time performance tracking.
Although the initial installation cost is slightly
higher, long-term maintenance costs are
substantially lower, making remote monitoring a
more cost-effective solution.
D
ISCUSSION
Interpretation of Key Findings
The results confirm that solar photovoltaic (PV)
panel performance is strongly influenced by
environmental factors, primarily solar irradiance,
temperature, and dust accumulation. High
irradiance is directly proportional to power output,
but excessive temperatures negatively impact
efficiency due to the temperature coefficient effect,
where every 1°C increase above 25°C reduces
efficiency by approximately 0.4% [9]. Dust
accumulation further contributes to energy losses,
with studies showing reductions between 8% and
15%, and in extreme cases, up to 70% in desert
environments if regular cleaning is not conducted
[10].
The implementation of IoT-based remote
monitoring systems has proven effective for real-
time data acquisition and long-term PV
performance assessment. This study demonstrated
that the remote monitoring system achieved a
Pearson correlation of 0.98 with manual
measurements, indicating high data reliability [11].
Field studies also support the effectiveness of such
systems, showing that remote monitoring reduces
maintenance costs by 47
–
95% due to early fault
detection and reduced site visits [12]. Compared to
traditional wired monitoring, remote IoT-based
systems offer higher scalability and operational
efficiency, making them essential for modern solar
power management [13].
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
73
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
Implications for the Solar Energy Sector
With the increasing penetration of solar PV
systems in smart grids, real-time monitoring plays
a critical role in maintaining grid stability. Remote
PV monitoring allows dynamic power regulation,
ensuring that fluctuations in solar generation are
balanced through automated control systems [14].
Recent studies have shown that integrating real-
time PV performance data with smart grid
analytics improves demand-supply matching and
enhances energy dispatch strategies, reducing
power losses by up to 12% [15].
International standards such as IEC 61724-1
emphasize the need for continuous PV system
monitoring, sensor calibration, and preventive
maintenance [16]. Governments and regulatory
bodies should mandate real-time monitoring
requirements for large-scale solar installations to
ensure optimal efficiency and reliability.
Additionally, implementing performance-based
incentive programs could encourage solar farm
operators
to
adopt
remote
monitoring
technologies
and
proactive
maintenance
strategies, reducing long-term energy losses [17].
Limitations and Future Work
One of the primary challenges in remote PV
monitoring is sensor calibration drift, which can
lead to inaccurate performance evaluations over
time. Research indicates that uncalibrated
irradiance sensors can introduce systematic errors
in
PV
efficiency
calculations,
potentially
invalidating months of collected data [18]. To
mitigate this, periodic sensor calibration (at least
annually) and redundant sensor networks should
be implemented to cross-verify measurements
[19].
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and
machine learning (ML) are enhancing remote PV
performance diagnostics. AI-powered predictive
maintenance models can detect performance
anomalies before they lead to significant energy
losses [20]. For example, deep learning-based fault
detection systems have been shown to identify
inverter and module failures with an accuracy
exceeding 95% [21]. Additionally, drone-based
infrared imaging combined with AI algorithms is
improving the identification of hot spots, cracks,
and dust accumulation, allowing for precise
maintenance planning [22]. Future research
should focus on developing self-calibrating sensor
systems and expanding AI-driven automation to
optimize PV monitoring further.
C
ONCLUSION
This study evaluated the effectiveness of remote
measurement
techniques
for
PV
panel
performance monitoring. The results confirmed
that:
−
Environmental factors (irradiance,
temperature, and dust) significantly impact PV
performance, with temperature increases reducing
efficiency and dust accumulation lowering power
output.
−
IoT-based
remote
monitoring
systems provide high data accuracy, with a
correlation coefficient of 0.98 compared to manual
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
74
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
measurements, and they effectively reduce
maintenance costs.
−
Real-time
PV
performance
monitoring can enhance smart grid stability,
improve energy dispatch strategies, and reduce
operational losses.
The findings contribute to the advancement of
automated and data-driven solar PV monitoring
systems by demonstrating the reliability and
efficiency of IoT-based solutions. The study also
highlights the importance of integrating AI-driven
analytics to enhance predictive maintenance and
improve long-term energy yield.
Further research is needed to improve sensor
calibration techniques, develop self-learning AI
models for performance optimization, and
integrate remote sensing with satellite-based solar
energy
forecasting.
Additionally,
policy
frameworks should be adapted to support
widespread implementation of real-time PV
monitoring technologies to maximize the efficiency
and reliability of solar power generation.
R
EFERENCES
1.
Hammer A, Heinemann D, Hoyer C, Kuhlemann
R, Lorenz E, Müller R, Beyer HG. Solar energy
assessment using remote sensing technologies.
Remote Sensing of Environment. 2003 Aug
15;86(3):423-32.
2.
Bianchini A, Gambuti M, Pellegrini M, Saccani C.
Performance
analysis
and
economic
assessment
of
different
photovoltaic
technologies
based
on
experimental
measurements. Renewable Energy. 2016 Jan
1;85:1-1.
3.
Hammer A, Heinemann D, Hoyer C, Kuhlemann
R, Lorenz E, Müller R, Beyer HG. Solar energy
assessment using remote sensing technologies.
Remote Sensing of Environment. 2003 Aug
15;86(3):423-32.
4.
Kar, N. K., Jana, S., Rahman, A., Ashokrao, P. R.,
Indhumathi, G., & Mangai, R. A. (2024, July).
Automated Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection
Using Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.
In 2024 International Conference on Data
Science and Network Security (ICDSNS) (pp. 1-
6).
IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSNS62112.2024.
10691276.
5.
Mounagurusamy, M. K., Thiyagarajan, V. S.,
Rahman, A., Chandak, S., Balaji, D., & Jallepalli, V.
R. (2024). RNN-Based Models for Predicting
Seizure
Onset
in
Epileptic
Patients.
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202412.2
375.v2.
6.
Nagaraju, S., Rahman, A., Rastogi, V., Ingole, B.
S., & Chandak, S. Adopting Cloud-Based
Blockchain and AI Technologies in Strategic
Management: Implications for Risk Assessment
and Decision Support.
7.
J. A. Duffie and W. A. Beckman, Solar
Engineering of Thermal Processes, 4th ed.
Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2013.
8.
M. Mani and R. Pillai, "Impact of dust on solar
photovoltaic (PV) performance: Research
status, challenges, and recommendations,"
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3124
–
3131, 2010.
Volume 05 Issue 05-2025
75
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
05
Pages:
62-75
OCLC
–
1368736135
9.
Louwen, W. van Sark, A. Faaij, and R. Schropp,
"Reassessment of net energy production and
greenhouse gas emissions avoidance after 40
years of photovoltaics development," Nature
Communications, vol. 7, 13728, 2016.
10.
S. Chin, P. Neelakantan, and R. C. N. Pilakkal,
"Internet of Things (IoT) in solar photovoltaic
systems: A review," Solar Energy, vol. 230, pp.
92-114, 2021.
11.
Belhaj and C. B. Jones, "An IoT-based
monitoring system for solar PV performance
assessment," IEEE Transactions on Industrial
Informatics, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4702
–
4711, 2020.
12.
Marion, "Comparison of predictive models for
photovoltaic module performance," Solar
Energy, vol. 168, pp. 32-40, 2018.
13.
Luque and S. Hegedus, Handbook of
Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, 2nd ed.
Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2011.
14.
International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC), "IEC 61724-1: Photovoltaic System
Performance
Monitoring
—
Guidelines
for
Measurement, Data Exchange and Analysis,"
IEC Standard, 2021.
15.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), "Best
Practices in PV System Operations and
Maintenance," National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO, USA, Rep.
NREL/TP-7A40-67553, 2020.
16.
S. Krauter, "Increased electrical yield via water
flow over the front of photovoltaic panels,"
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 82,
no. 1-2, pp. 131-137, 2004.
17.
Mellit and S. A. Kalogirou, "Artificial intelligence
techniques for photovoltaic applications: A
review," Progress in Energy and Combustion
Science, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 574
–
632, 2008.
18.
H. Yang, A. Y. Zhang, and C. K. Lee, "Artificial
intelligence-based fault detection and diagnosis
for photovoltaic systems: A review," Applied
Energy, vol. 297, 2021.
19.
M. A. S. Masoum, H. Dehbonei, and E. F. Fuchs,
"Theoretical and experimental analyses of
photovoltaic systems with voltage and current-
based maximum power-point tracking," IEEE
Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 17, no.
4, pp. 514
–
522, 2002.
20.
Yousfi and A. H. Alami, "Drone-based infrared
thermography
for
photovoltaic
system
inspection: Challenges and best practices,"
Renewable Energy, vol. 180, pp. 850
–
862, 2022.
21.
Akhmedov J, Jurayev U, Kosimova S, Rakhimova
G, Tursunov Q, Kosimov L. The Significant
Technical Mantle of AI in the Field of Secular
Engineering: an Innovative Design. In2024 4th
International
Conference
on
Advance
Computing and Innovative Technologies in
Engineering (ICACITE) 2024 May 14 (pp. 601-
606). IEEE.
22.
Zebari RR, Majeed MG, Mohammed MQ,
Abdulhussain ZN, Kosimov L, Alchilibi H.
Dynamic Template Learning for Top-Level
Computer Management Using Bayesian
Optimization. In2023 3rd International
Conference on Advancement in Electronics &
Communication Engineering (AECE) 2023 Nov
23 (pp. 840-844). IEEE.
