Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
10
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
P
AGES
:
10-16
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
National economic security has emerged as a critical component of broader security strategies in contemporary
geopolitics, where economic policies and decisions are increasingly framed through the lens of securitization. This
paper critically examines the politics of securitization in relation to national economic security, investigating how
economic issues such as trade, finance, resources, and infrastructure are being treated as national security concerns.
Drawing on the securitization theory, this study analyzes how economic challenges
—
ranging from supply chain
vulnerabilities to cyber threats in finance
—
are redefined as existential threats to the stability and sovereignty of
nations. The paper explores the implications of this shift, highlighting both the potential benefits and risks associated
with framing economic issues in security terms. By reviewing case studies from various global contexts, this research
aims to understand the consequences of securitizing economic matters and the political dynamics that shape such
decisions. Ultimately, the paper argues that while securitization can offer strategic advantages in addressing
economic vulnerabilities, it also raises significant questions about governance, state power, and individual freedoms,
urging a careful balance between economic policy and security measures.
KEYWORDS
National Economic Security, Securitization, Political Economy, Security Policy, Trade Security, Economic Sovereignty,
Cybersecurity, Resource Security, Geopolitics, Governance, Economic Vulnerabilities.
INTRODUCTION
In an increasingly interconnected and volatile global
environment, national economic security has become
a focal point in the discourse surrounding state
security. Traditionally, national security was defined in
terms of military power and defense capabilities;
however, as economic interdependencies and
Research Article
NATIONAL ECONOMIC SECURITY AND THE POLITICS OF
SECURITIZATION: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION
Submission Date:
October 28, 2024,
Accepted Date:
November 02, 2024,
Published Date:
November 07, 2024
Khairi Faden
Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Parahyangan Catholic University, Ciumbuleuit, Bandung, Indonesia
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijhps
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
11
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
P
AGES
:
10-16
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
vulnerabilities have grown, the scope of security
concerns has expanded to encompass economic
factors. This shift is particularly evident in the concept
of securitization
—
where economic issues traditionally
understood as part of the market or policy domain are
framed as national security threats. The politics of
securitization in the realm of national economic
security has thus become a critical area of inquiry for
policymakers,
scholars,
and
international
organizations alike.
The notion of securitization stems from the work of the
Copenhagen School of Security Studies, which posits
that issues can be transformed into security threats
through a process of political and rhetorical framing.
Applied to economic matters, this framework suggests
that states increasingly present issues such as financial
instability, energy security, trade disruptions, and even
cyber-attacks as existential threats that require
extraordinary measures to mitigate. For instance,
economic sanctions, strategic trade interventions, and
robust cybersecurity measures are now often justified
under the rubric of national security, blurring the lines
between economic policy and security policy.
While the securitization of economic issues has the
potential to enhance the ability of states to safeguard
their economic interests, it also raises important
questions. What are the implications of securitizing
economic
security?
Does
framing
economic
vulnerabilities as national security threats create a
more resilient economic system, or does it lead to
overreach and unnecessary state control? What role do
political ideologies, international relations, and power
dynamics play in shaping this discourse?
This paper aims to critically examine the politics of
securitization in the context of national economic
security. Through a comprehensive analysis of
contemporary case studies, this study explores how
different nations have framed economic issues as
security concerns and assesses the outcomes of such
political strategies. By delving into the political,
economic, and social consequences of securitization,
this research seeks to illuminate the complex dynamics
that govern national economic security in the modern
age.
METHODOLOGY
This study adopts a qualitative, interdisciplinary
research approach to critically examine the politics of
securitization in the context of national economic
security. The methodology combines theoretical
analysis with empirical case studies, allowing for an in-
depth exploration of how economic issues are framed
as security threats and the political dynamics that drive
this securitization process. The following steps outline
the methodological approach for this research:
Theoretical Framework:
The research is grounded in securitization theory,
which provides a framework for understanding how
issues are constructed as security threats. Drawing
from the work of the Copenhagen School of Security
Studies, the study employs the concept of
"securitization" as a central lens for analyzing how
economic issues
—
such as trade imbalances, resource
scarcity, financial instability, and cybersecurity
threats
—
are redefined as urgent national security
concerns. The theory will be applied to understand the
rhetorical processes through which these economic
issues are portrayed as existential threats that
necessitate extraordinary measures, including state
intervention and policy changes. This framework
guides the exploration of the political discourse
surrounding economic security and the motivations
behind its securitization.
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
12
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
P
AGES
:
10-16
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Case Study Selection:
To illustrate the impact of securitization on national
economic security, this study selects a range of case
studies from different geopolitical contexts. These
case studies include countries that have explicitly
framed economic concerns as security threats and
implemented security-driven policies in response. For
example, the study will analyze:
The United States and Cybersecurity in Finance:
Investigating how cybersecurity threats to financial
infrastructure have been treated as national security
concerns, leading to legislative action such as the
Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act.
China and Resource Security: Examining how China’s
growing interest in securing access to natural
resources, particularly through its Belt and Road
Initiative, is framed in terms of national security.
European Union and Trade Policy: Analyzing the EU's
response to trade disruptions and economic
dependence on external suppliers, with a focus on how
security discourse influences economic policy-making.
Russia and Energy Security: Exploring how Russia's
control over energy supplies to Europe is presented as
a geopolitical lever and a national security priority.
The selection of these case studies allows for a cross-
national comparison of different securitization
strategies and the varying political, economic, and
social contexts that shape them.
Document and Discourse Analysis:
A key component of this study involves document and
discourse analysis to understand how national
governments,
international
organizations,
and
influential political actors frame economic issues as
security threats. Primary sources such as government
policy papers, official statements, national security
strategies, and speeches by policymakers will be
analyzed. The research will also examine international
reports from organizations such as the United Nations,
World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund, as
these bodies increasingly discuss the intersection of
economic and security issues. Discourse analysis will
identify the language and rhetoric used to construct
economic issues as security threats, paying particular
attention to how terms like "vulnerability," "threat,"
and "sovereignty" are employed in public debates and
policy frameworks.
Interviews and Expert Opinions:
To complement the document analysis, qualitative
interviews will be conducted with key experts in the
fields of international relations, economics, and
security studies. These interviews will involve
policymakers, economists, and security analysts who
have direct experience with or have contributed to the
securitization of economic issues. The insights gained
from these experts will provide valuable perspectives
on the motivations behind securitization, the political
forces at play, and the implications of framing
economic concerns within a security framework.
Interviews will also explore the tensions between
economic efficiency and national security priorities, as
well as the challenges of balancing security measures
with the preservation of open markets.
Comparative Analysis:
A comparative approach will be used to assess how
different countries approach the securitization of
economic issues. The study will compare the domestic
and international implications of securitizing economic
security in different political systems, examining the
extent to which security-driven economic policies are
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
13
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
P
AGES
:
10-16
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
effective in addressing real vulnerabilities or whether
they have unintended negative consequences. The
comparative analysis will also assess the impact of
securitization on international relations, such as trade
wars, diplomatic tensions, or shifts in global power
dynamics.
Policy Impact Assessment:
Finally, the study will assess the policy outcomes of
securitizing economic issues. By examining the long-
term effects of security-driven economic policies, the
research will determine whether these measures
contribute to a more resilient economic system or if
they result in economic protectionism, reduced
international cooperation, or other negative side
effects. This section will involve an analysis of how
policies such as economic sanctions, trade barriers, and
resource control strategies have affected national
economies,
international trade relations, and
geopolitical stability.
Theoretical Implications:
The methodology will also involve synthesizing the
findings from the case studies and analysis to
contribute to the broader theoretical debate on the
securitization of economic issues. The research will
evaluate the strengths and limitations of securitization
theory in explaining the integration of economic
concerns into national security discourses and propose
refinements to the theory based on empirical findings.
By combining theoretical analysis with real-world case
studies and expert perspectives, this research provides
a comprehensive examination of the politics of
securitization in the context of national economic
security. The findings aim to illuminate the complex
dynamics between economic policy, security concerns,
and global political power.
RESULTS
The analysis of the case studies revealed distinct
patterns in how various states have securitized
economic issues, highlighting both the motivations
behind these actions and their implications for national
and global politics.
Motivations for Securitization: In each case, states
were found to have securitized economic issues in
response to perceived vulnerabilities or threats to
national sovereignty. For instance, the United States
emphasized cybersecurity threats to its financial
infrastructure, while the European Union focused on
trade security, particularly regarding reliance on
external suppliers. China’s securitization of resource
access, driven by the need to sustain growth and assert
international influence, and Russia’s framing of energy
as a security asset underscored how nations connect
economic concerns with strategic geopolitical
objectives. The findings suggest that economic
securitization is largely driven by the desire to protect
domestic interests, ensure economic stability, and
maintain a competitive edge in the global market.
Impact on Policy and Economic Practices: Securitizing
economic concerns has led to a variety of policy
responses,
including
trade
barriers,
strategic
partnerships, and the reinforcement of national
infrastructure. For example, U.S. policies on
cybersecurity now include stringent regulations on
information sharing between private firms and
government agencies, while the EU has established
initiatives to reduce dependency on external suppliers.
China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) highlights a
strategic investment approach for securing critical
resources, whereas Russia has used its energy
resources to influence European political dynamics.
These findings indicate that securitization often leads
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
14
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
P
AGES
:
10-16
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
to policies that emphasize self-reliance, control over
resources, and economic resilience.
International Relations and Global Impact: The
securitization of economic issues has also impacted
international relations, frequently leading to tensions
between countries. For example, U.S.-China trade
disputes, influenced by security rhetoric, reflect
broader strategic competition between the two
nations. Similarly, Russia’s use of energy as a
geopolitical tool has led to strained relationships with
the European Union. The results demonstrate that
while securitization can strengthen national security, it
can also heighten diplomatic tensions and reduce
cooperation,
complicating
global
economic
integration.
DISCUSSION
The results indicate that the securitization of national
economic issues is a growing trend among nations
facing increasing global interdependence and
economic competition. Securitization provides states
with the justification to implement policies that
prioritize economic stability and resilience, even if
these measures disrupt international trade norms or
cooperation.
Balancing Security and Economic Liberalism: The
findings
underscore
the
tension
between
securitization and economic liberalism. While
securitization supports policies focused on self-
sufficiency and national resilience, these measures
often contradict the principles of free trade and
globalization. The case of the EU demonstrates the
difficulty of balancing open trade policies with the
desire for economic autonomy. This tension raises
questions about the future of international trade as
more states adopt protectionist measures in the name
of security.
Broader Political Implications: The securitization of
economic issues reflects a shift in how states view
security and sovereignty, suggesting that economic
vulnerabilities are increasingly seen as potential
threats to national stability. By framing economic
concerns as security issues, governments gain the
ability to exercise greater control over economic policy
and infrastructure. However, this expanded role risks
excessive state intervention, potentially curbing
individual freedoms, corporate autonomy, and
democratic oversight. Securitization also tends to
concentrate power within state institutions, allowing
governments to exercise greater influence over private
sectors and transnational corporations.
Impact on Geopolitical Power Dynamics: Securitization
can alter global power dynamics by shifting alliances
and triggering protective policies. For instance,
countries affected by trade barriers and sanctions
often respond by forming new alliances to
counterbalance these measures. The U.S.-China trade
rivalry and the EU’s efforts to diversify suppliers
illustrate how economic security concerns drive
geopolitical realignments, creating new power blocs
that are increasingly based on mutual security interests
rather than economic compatibility alone.
Ethical and Social Considerations: The securitization of
economic concerns has implications for individual
rights and global equity. National security policies that
address economic threats can impact citizens’ li
ves,
particularly when restrictions are placed on
information flows, access to resources, and consumer
goods. There are also ethical questions regarding the
balance between state control and market freedoms.
The restriction of international access to essential
resources for reasons of "national security" could lead
to inequalities, where powerful countries are better
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
15
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
P
AGES
:
10-16
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
positioned to secure their interests, potentially at the
expense of less influential nations.
CONCLUSION
The securitization of national economic issues is
transforming the landscape of global economics and
security policy. This study has shown that countries
increasingly view economic factors
—
such as trade,
resource management, cybersecurity, and financial
stability
—
as integral to their national security agendas.
By reframing these economic issues as security
concerns, states gain the flexibility to adopt protective
measures that might otherwise be incompatible with
liberal economic principles.
However, the securitization of economic concerns is a
double-edged sword. While it can fortify national
resilience and mitigate vulnerabilities, it also risks
destabilizing global economic systems by encouraging
protectionist policies and reducing interdependence.
The findings suggest that, although securitization is an
effective tool for addressing economic threats, it must
be carefully managed to avoid eroding international
cooperation, inflaming diplomatic tensions, and
impinging upon freedoms within domestic economies.
Future policy approaches should aim for a balanced
approach that addresses legitimate security concerns
while respecting global trade norms and individual
rights. States should consider adopting frameworks
that allow for economic security measures without
compromising international cooperation, and efforts
should be made to develop multilateral agreements
that address economic vulnerabilities in a cooperative
manner. In an era where the boundaries between
economics and security are increasingly blurred,
fostering dialogue and building resilience through
collaboration may prove essential to preserving
stability and prosperity in the global economy.
REFERENCE
1.
Anthon CM. Non-Traditional Security Studies: A
Transnational Approach. London, California, New
Delhi and Singapore. Sage, 2016.
2.
Baldwin AD. The Concept of Security. Review of
International Studies, British International Studies
Association. 1997; 23:5-26.
3.
Browning SC, McDonald M. The Future of Critical
Security Studies: Ethics and the Politics of Security.
European Journal of International Relations. 2011;
19(2):235-255.
Doi:
10.1177/1354066111419538.
London, Sage.
4.
Gaffield et al. Public Health Effects of Inadequacy
Managed Storm water Runoff. American Journal of
Public Health. 2003; 93:9.
5.
Hill C. Foreign Policy in The Twenty-First Century.
Ed. 2. London, Palgrave: Macmillan Education,
2016.
6.
Hoy C. The Study that Shows life is a Lot More
Unequal. Than You (Probably) Think. Inequality by
The
Guardian
retrieved
from,
2017.
https://amp.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/jun/0
6/stu
dy-shows-life-is-a-lot-more-unequal-than-
youprobably-think?__twitter_impression=true
7.
Hudson MV. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and
Contemporary Theory. Ed. 2. UK, Rowman and
Littlefield, 2014.
8.
Li HY, Tung PC, Chen YP. Storm water Management
towards Water Supply at the Community Scale-A
Case
Study
in
Northern
Taiwan.
MDPI:
Sustainability. 2017; 9:1206. doi: 10.3390/su
9071206.
9.
Macleod A. Les Etudes de Sécurité: Du
Constructivisme Dominant au Constructivisme
Critique. Retrieved from Conflicts and cultures 54
Canadian Perspective: Approches Critiques de la
Sécurité, 2004, 13-15. Doi : 10.4000/conflits.1506.
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
16
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
P
AGES
:
10-16
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
10.
Mcglinchey S, Walters R, Scheinpflug C.
International Relations Theory. England, Bristol: E-
International Relations Publishing, 2017
