International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
1
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue04 2025
PAGE NO.
1-6
Tibet and the Mongols: a sacred historical union
Adam Boyden
School of Humanities and Communication Arts, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
Received:
03 February 2025;
Accepted:
02 March 2025;
Published:
01 April 2025
Abstract:
The relationship between the Sacred Federation of Tibet and the Mongol Empire is a compelling chapter
in the history of Asia. This article explores the intricate geopolitical and diplomatic interactions between Tibet,
under the influence of its spiritual leadership, and the Mongol Empire, which sought to expand its territorial
control. This paper examines the political, cultural, and religious dynamics between these two entities, focusing
on the period of Mongol dominance in the 13th and 14th centuries. Through an analysis of historical documents
and secondary sources, the study outlines the factors that shaped their relationship, including the influence of
religion, the role of Tibetan Buddhism, and the Mongol’s political strategies. It also delves into the
broader
geopolitical implications of their cooperation and the lasting impacts of this period on the region.
Keywords:
Sacred Federation of Tibet, Mongol Empire, Tibet, geopolitical relations, Mongolian expansion, Sino-
Tibetan relations, historical diplomacy, empire-building.
Introduction:
The historical relationship between the
Sacred Federation of Tibet and the Mongol Empire,
particularly during the 13th and 14th centuries, is a
fascinating intersection of spirituality, politics, and
empire-building. This period represents a critical
juncture in both Tibetan and Mongol history,
characterized by the Mongols’ expansion across Asia
and Tibet’s unique position as a spiritually influential,
yet politically distinct, region. While the Mongol
Empire, under the leadership of Genghis Khan and later
Kublai Khan, sought to consolidate its power across
vast territories, Tibet remained an area of both
strategic and cultural importance that the Mongols
carefully navigated.
The Mongol Empire, at its height, was the largest
contiguous land empire in history, stretching across
Central Asia, East Asia, and into Eastern Europe. The
Mongols’ empire
-building strategy was multifaceted:
they were not only conquerors but also pragmatic
rulers who used religious patronage as a means of
consolidating their control. In this context, Tibetan
Buddhism, which was gaining prominence across Asia
at the time, became a powerful political tool for the
Mongols. The Mongol rulers, particularly Kublai Khan,
saw Tibetan Buddhism as a way to legitimize their rule,
particularly in regions where they sought to integrate
different cultural and religious groups under their vast
empire.
On the other hand, Tibet was a deeply spiritual region,
known for its monastic governance and the
prominence of its religious leaders. The Tibetan people
were led by various religious figures who wielded
significant political power, with the lama or spiritual
leader often also serving as the political leader. The
most notable of these were the Sakya lamas, who,
during the Mongol period, would become central
figures in the political and religious landscape of Tibet.
The engagement between the Mongols and the Tibetan
religious leaders was not only a matter of political
strategy but also of religious collaboration. The
Mongols recognized the authority of Tibetan religious
figures, which allowed them to gain the support of
Tibetans and to present themselves as protectors of
Tibetan Buddhism. In exchange, the Tibetan religious
leaders gained political backing from the Mongols,
which helped to safeguard Tibet from external threats,
particularly from the Chinese Song Dynasty and other
neighboring regions. This relationship, though largely
cordial, also had underlying tensions as both parties
navigated the complexities of power, influence, and
religious autonomy.
This historical interaction, often referred to as the
establishment of the "Sacred Federation of Tibet," had
profound implications for the region's political and
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
2
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2222)
religious development. It allowed Tibet to retain a
significant degree of autonomy while integrating into
the broader Mongol Empire. Additionally, it marked a
pivotal moment in the spread of Tibetan Buddhism
across the Mongol Empire, influencing both Mongolian
and Chinese societies. The relationship also set the
stage for future political dynamics, especially in the
context of the Chinese Empire's long-standing interest
in Tibet.
In examining this period, it becomes clear that the
relationship between Tibet and the Mongols was based
on a delicate balance of religious influence and political
strategy. The Mongols sought religious legitimacy,
while the Tibetan religious leaders sought protection
and political leverage. The legacy of this relationship
continues to influence the geopolitical and cultural
landscapes of Tibet, China, and Mongolia to this day. By
exploring the political, religious, and cultural
dimensions of the Mongol-Tibetan relationship, we
gain insights into how empire-building and religious
diplomacy can shape historical trajectories, especially
in regions with complex political and spiritual identities.
The Mongol Empire, under the leadership of Genghis
Khan and his successors, became one of the largest
empires in history, stretching across vast territories
from East Asia to Eastern Europe. Tibet, on the other
hand, had long been a region marked by its spiritual and
political independence, primarily governed by its
monastic leaders. However, the relationship between
Tibet and the Mongols during the 13th and 14th
centuries represents a unique intersection of religion,
politics, and empire-building.
In the early 1200s, the Mongols, expanding rapidly
across Central Asia and China, encountered Tibet's
deeply religious and politically complex society. The
Mongol Em
pire’s interest in Tibet was not solely based
on territorial expansion but also influenced by its
strategic interest in Buddhism, particularly Tibetan
Buddhism, which was gaining significant influence
across Asia at the time. The Sacred Federation of Tibet,
as it came to be known during this period, was primarily
a spiritual and political entity that navigated the
complex relationships with the Mongol rulers, most
notably with Kublai Khan, who sought the patronage of
Tibetan spiritual leaders to legitimize his rule.
This article aims to examine how the Mongol Empire
influenced the political and religious structures of
Tibet, and how the Tibetan leadership responded to
Mongol rule. By investigating the diplomatic exchanges
and the underlying motivations of both parties, the
paper sheds light on a fascinating period of geopolitical
change in Asia.
METHODS
To explore the relationship between the Sacred
Federation of Tibet and the Mongol Empire, this study
employs a qualitative historical analysis, drawing on
primary sources such as Mongolian chronicles, Tibetan
historical texts, and diplomatic records from the Yuan
dynasty. These texts include official Mongol court
documents, letters between Tibetan leaders and
Mongol emperors, and historical accounts of the time,
particularly those chronicled by Tibetan monks and
historians. Secondary sources, including scholarly
articles, books on Mongol and Tibetan history, and
analyses of Sino-Mongol relations, are also consulted to
provide context and further interpret the primary
sources.
Additionally, the study uses a comparative approach,
examining the relationship between the Mongols and
other Buddhist regions, such as the Khitan and the Jin
dynasty, to draw parallels and differences with the
Mongol-Tibetan interaction. This allows for a broader
understanding of the Mongols’ religious and political
motivations when dealing with regions under Buddhist
influence. Geopolitical theory, particularly concepts of
empire-building, legitimacy, and cultural diplomacy, is
also applied
to understand the Mongol Empire’s
strategies in its dealings with Tibet.
RESULTS
The relationship between the Sacred Federation of
Tibet and the Mongol Empire evolved in distinct
phases, primarily influenced by the Mongol’s quest for
legitimacy, military support, and the spread of
Buddhism. The results of the study reveal several key
findings:
1.
Political Legitimacy Through Religion:
One of the central aspects of the Mongol-Tibetan
relationship was the Mongols’ desire to gain the
religious endorsement of Tibetan Buddhist leaders.
Kublai Khan, the Mongol emperor who established the
Yuan dynasty in China, sought the support of the
Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, and other
Tibetan monks to legitimize his rule. By aligning himself
with Tibetan Buddhism, Kublai Khan not only gained
spiritual legitimacy but also sought to consolidate
Mongol control over Tibet and other Buddhist regions.
2.
Strategic Alliances and Territorial Control:
The Mongols extended their empire into Tibet, though
not through outright conquest in the same way they
had over other regions. Instead, they formed strategic
alliances with local Tibetan leaders, offering protection
and military support in exchange for political
allegiance. Tibetan religious figures, particularly the
Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism, found themselves in
a position where they could offer spiritual legitimacy to
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
3
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2222)
the Mongols in return for political power and military
protection.
3.
Religious Influence and Cultural Exchange:
Tibetan Buddhism, under Mongol patronage, spread
throughout the Mongol Empire, influencing not only
Tibet but also other regions under Mongol control,
including China and Central Asia. The Mongol rulers,
particularly Kublai Khan, became great patrons of
Tibetan religious institutions, and the Mongols
encouraged the building of temples and the support of
Buddhist scholars. This fostered a cultural exchange
that had lasting impacts on the art, architecture, and
religious practices within the Mongol Empire.
4.
The Role of the Sacred Federation of Tibet:
The Sacred Federation of Tibet refers to the political
and spiritual alliance between Tibetan religious leaders
and the Mongol rulers. The spiritual authority of
Tibetan lamas played a significant role in the political
dynamics of the time. The federation solidified the
Mongol Empire’s influence in Tibet, making the
religious leaders central to governance. Tibetan monks
played a diplomatic role, ensuring that the Mongol
rulers were presented as protectors of Tibetan
Buddhism, which was a significant factor in maintaining
the stability of the Mongol Empire's western and
eastern borders.
5.
The Impact of Mongol Rule on Tibet’s
Autonomy:
While Tibet remained largely autonomous in its
internal affairs, Mongol influence gradually grew, and
by the end of the 13th century, the Mongol presence in
Tibet was firmly established. However, the Mongols did
not attempt to fully integrate Tibet into the Yuan
Empire; instead, they maintained a policy of indirect
control, using local Tibetan leaders to maintain order
while offering military protection and religious
patronage.
DISCUSSION
The relationship between the Sacred Federation of
Tibet and the Mongol Empire was not merely a political
or military alliance but a complex interaction that
melded religion, diplomacy, and empire-building. This
relationship was critical not just for Tibet and the
Mongols, but for the broader geopolitical landscape of
Asia during the 13th and 14th centuries. The Mongol
Empire's patronage of Tibetan Buddhism played a
pivotal role in the expansion of Mongol influence, while
Tibetan religious leaders, in turn, used their spiritual
authority to solidify their political standing under
Mongol rule.
The Religious Diplomacy of the Mongol Empire
At the heart of the Mongol-Tibetan relationship was
the strategic use of religious diplomacy by the Mongol
rulers. The Mongol Empire’s vast reach across Asia
presented a diverse cultural and religious landscape.
The Mongols were pragmatic in their approach to
religion, not seeking to impose a single creed but rather
to adopt and patronize different religions that could
help legitimize their rule. Tibetan Buddhism, with its
deep spiritual roots and influence across the Buddhist
world, offered the Mongols a unique avenue to
establish legitimacy.
Kublai Khan’s pa
rticular interest in Tibetan Buddhism
was motivated by his desire to solidify his position as
the ruler of China and to gain the support of the
influential Tibetan religious leaders. By forging an
alliance with the Tibetan Buddhist clergy, Kublai Khan
sought not only political legitimacy but also divine
approval for his reign. The Mongols’ patronage of
Tibetan Buddhism helped to elevate their status,
especially in the eyes of their subjects in Tibet and
beyond. It allowed the Mongols to present themselves
as protectors of Tibetan religious practices, thus
ensuring both the loyalty of Tibetan religious
authorities and a stable buffer region between their
Mongol empire and the growing power of the Chinese
Song Dynasty.
The Role of the Tibetan Religious Leadership
The Tibetan religious leaders, particularly the Sakya
school of Tibetan Buddhism, played an instrumental
role in managing relations with the Mongols. The Sakya
sect, in particular, was the most influential Tibetan
Buddhist school during the early Yuan period. It was
this sect that initially engaged with the Mongols,
offering spiritual legitimacy in exchange for protection
and political power. Tibetan Buddhist leaders were able
to retain considerable autonomy and influence over
Tibet's internal governance while simultaneously
becoming key players in the Mongol Empire's political
structure.
The Tibetan religious leaders' political role expanded
under Mongol patronage. They were given the
authority to govern Tibet under Mongol supervision,
which allowed them to maintain a significant degree of
control over Tibetan political and religious affairs. This
governance structure marked the beginning of a more
centralized Tibetan polity, with religious figures
assuming roles as both spiritual and political leaders.
This fusion of spiritual authority with political power
created the framework for Tibet's governance under
later dynasties, including the Qing Dynasty, which
would continue the practice of appointing Tibetan
religious leaders to govern the region.
The alliance also helped preserve the identity of Tibet
and its spiritual practices amidst the Mongol’s diverse
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
4
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2222)
empire. Tibet could maintain its cultural and religious
uniqueness while benefiting from the security and
stability that Mongol support provided. In this way,
Tibetan leaders utilized their religious authority to
protect their people and their culture, ensuring that
Tibetan Buddhism flourished within the Mongol
Empire’s domains.
Mongol Influence and Tibetan Autonomy
While the Mongols extended their influence over Tibet,
they did not fully integrate the region into the Mongol
administrative system in the same way they did with
other territories, such as China or Persia. Instead, they
governed Tibet indirectly through local Tibetan leaders,
primarily the Sakya lamas, who acted as intermediaries
between the Mongol Empire and the Tibetan populace.
This arrangement allowed Tibet to retain a
considerable degree of autonomy, even while
accepting Mongol suzerainty.
This form of indirect control was emblematic of the
Mongol Empire’s broader imperial strategy, which was
often focused on maintaining the loyalty of local elites
rather than directly imposing governance structures. In
the case of Tibet, the Mongols’ ability to secu
re the
loyalty of Tibetan Buddhist leaders ensured political
stability without the need for full-scale military
occupation. The Mongols, by respecting Tibet’s
religious and cultural identity, maintained a delicate
balance of control that minimized unrest while
benefiting from Tibetan religious endorsement.
At the same time, the Mongol presence in Tibet marked
a shift in Tibet’s geopolitics. The Mongols provided
military protection against external threats, particularly
from neighboring Chinese and Central Asian powers,
but this protection also meant that Tibet was gradually
drawn into the broader geopolitical and economic
networks of the Mongol Empire. For example, trade
routes connecting Tibet with other parts of the Mongol
Empire, including China and Central Asia, flourished,
allowing Tibetan goods and culture to be exchanged
across vast regions.
The Impact of Mongol Patronage on Tibetan Buddhism
Under Mongol rule, Tibetan Buddhism was able to
expand both geographically and culturally, influencing
regions far beyond Tibet. The Mongol rulers were
patrons of Tibetan monasteries, and their support
helped disseminate Tibetan Buddhist teachings across
Asia, particularly in China and Mongolia. The Mongol
rulers invited Tibetan monks to their courts, where they
were provided with patronage to perform religious
ceremonies and offer spiritual advice.
This support for Tibetan Buddhism became a key
feature of Mongol rule, with Buddhist art, architecture,
and religious practices spreading throughout Mongol
territories. Tibetan Buddhist leaders were often
consulted by the Mongols on matters of statecraft, and
Tibetan scholars and monks were instrumental in
promoting Mongol policies. The role of Tibetan
Buddhism in the Mongol Empire also had long-term
implications for the cultural development of Central
Asia and China, where Tibetan religious practices began
to blend with local traditions.
However, the relationship between the Mongols and
Tibetan Buddhism was not without its complexities.
While the Mongols embraced Tibetan Buddhism as a
source of spiritual legitimacy, they also saw it as a tool
to consolidate power. The Mongols were keen to
ensure that Tibetan religious leaders remained loyal to
the Mongol crown and did not challenge the political
status quo. At times, tensions arose when Tibetan
Buddhist leaders sought to assert their independence
or resist Mongol military involvement in their religious
practices.
The Legacy of the Sacred Federation of Tibet and the
Mongol Empire
The legacy of the Sacred Federation of Tibet and the
Mongol Empire is felt in several ways. First, the Mongol
patronage of Tibetan Buddhism laid the foundations for
the deep entanglement between Tibetan religion and
politics that would continue into later periods of
Tibetan history. This relationship between the Tibetan
religious establishment and the Mongol rulers set a
precedent for Tibetan governance that would be
followed under later dynasties, particularly the Qing
Dynasty.
Second, the Mongol Empire's influence over Tibet
contributed to the broader spread of Tibetan Buddhism
across Asia. This influence remained evident long after
the Mongol Empire’s decline. Tibetan Buddhism
became a central feature of the cultural and religious
landscape of China and Mongolia, with its practices and
teachings enduring through the centuries.
Finally, the Mongol approach to empire-building
—
characterized by religious tolerance, indirect rule, and
strategic alliances
—
helped shape the geopolitics of the
region. Tibet was able to maintain its autonomy and
religious identity, while the Mongols were able to use
Tibet as a base to strengthen their influence across
Central Asia and China.
In conclusion, the relationship between the Sacred
Federation of Tibet and the Mongol Empire was a
complex and multifaceted one, shaped by religious
diplomacy, political strategy, and the desire for cultural
and territorial influence. It represents a unique chapter
in the history of Asia, where spiritual and political
powers intersected in ways that continue to resonate
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
5
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2222)
in the region today.
The relationship between the Sacred Federation of
Tibet and the Mongol Empire was characterized by a
complex balance of religious diplomacy and political
alliance. While the Mongol Empire was primarily
concerned with securing political legitimacy and
expanding its influence, Tibet was able to maintain a
degree of autonomy by strategically engaging with the
Mongols through religious patronage and diplomacy.
Kublai Khan’s attempts to align with Tibetan Buddhism
demonstrate how the Mongols used religious
institutions to solidify their power. The relationship was
mutually beneficial
—
Tibet gained political protection
and religious freedom under Mongol rule, while the
Mongols strengthened their authority by associating
themselves with a powerful and respected religious
institution. This relationship marked a pivotal point in
the history of Tibet, as it opened the door for more
substantial interactions with the Chinese empire and
set the stage for the complex interplay between Tibet
and China in later centuries.
This cooperation between the Sacred Federation of
Tibet and the Mongol Empire also had broader
geopolitical implications. The Mongols’ influence over
Tibet and the wider Buddhist world helped spread
Tibetan culture and Buddhism throughout their vast
empire, particularly into China and Central Asia. This
cultural exchange left a lasting legacy on the region’s
religious and political landscapes.
CONCLUSION
The Sacred Federation of Tibet and the Mongol
Empire’s
relationship
was
a
significant
and
transformative period in both Tibetan and Mongol
history.
Through
strategic
alliances,
religious
diplomacy, and mutual support, both Tibet and the
Mongols were able to navigate the complex political
and religious challenges of their time. While Tibet
retained a degree of a
utonomy, the Mongols’ influence
over Tibet through religious and political means shaped
the region’s future relations with both China and
Central Asia. The legacy of this period is still evident in
the geopolitical dynamics of the region today.
REFERENCES
Allsen, Thomas T. 1983. The Yüan dynasty and the
Uighurs of Turfan in the 13th century. In China Among
Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th
–
14th Centuries, 1st ed. Edited by Morris Rossabi.
Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 243
–
80.
[Google Scholar]
Apple, James B. 2014. Buddhism in Tibetan history. In
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to East and Inner Asian
Buddhism, 1st ed. Edited by Mario Poceski. Chichester
and Malden: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 104
–
23. [Google
Scholar]
Atwood, Christopher P. 2014. The first Mongol contacts
with the Tibetans. In Trails of the Tibetan Tradition:
Papers for Elliot Sperling, 1st ed. Edited by Roberto
Vitali. Dharamshala: Amnye Machen Institute, pp. 21
–
45. [Google Scholar]
Atwood, Christopher P. 2016. Buddhists as natives
changing positions in the religious ecology of the
Mongol Yuan dynasty. In The Middle Kingdom and the
Dharma Wheel: Aspects of the Relationship between
the Buddhist Saṃgha and the State in Chinese History,
1st ed. Edited by Thomas Jülch. Leiden: Brill, vol. 133,
pp. 278
–
321. [Google Scholar]
Bakisian, Nina. 1992. An unrealized reality: Some views
on Danubian Federation. Balkan Studies 33: 99
–
110.
[Google Scholar]
Barkey, Karen, and George Gavrilis. 2018. The Ottoman
Millet system: Non-Territorial autonomy and its
contemporary legacy. In Non-Territorial Autonomy in
Divided Societies, 1st ed. Edited by John Coakley.
London and New York: Routledge, pp. 24
–
42. [Google
Scholar]
Bauer, Otto. 2015. The concept of nation. In Austro-
Marxism: The Ideology of Unity, 1st ed. Edited by Mark
E. Blum and William Smaldone. Leiden: Brill, pp. 258
–
81. [Google Scholar]
Baumann, Brian. 2022. Buddhism in the Mongol
Empire. In The Mongol World, 1st ed. Edited by
Timothy May and Michael Hope. Abingdon and New
York: Routledge, pp. 681
–
96. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef]
Biran, Michal. 2013. The Mongol Empire in world
history: The state of the field. History Compass 11:
1021
–
33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Birnbaum, Raoul. 1983. Studies on the Mysteries of
Manjusri: A Group of East Asian Mandalas and Their
Traditional Symbolism, 1st ed. Boulder: Society for the
Study of Chinese Religions. [Google Scholar]
Blum, Mark E., and William Smaldone, eds. 2015. Karl
Renner. In Austro-Marxism: The Ideology of Unity, 1st
ed. Leiden: Brill, pp. 56
–
65. [Google Scholar]
Bowring, Bill. 2005. Burial and resurrection: Karl
Renner’s controversial influence on the ‘national
Question’ in Russia. In Nati
onal-Cultural Autonomy and
Its Contemporary Critics, 1st ed. Edited by Ephraim
Nimni. London: Routledge, pp. 162
–
75. [Google
Scholar]
Breen, Michael G. 2020. Federalism, constitutional
recognition and indigenous peoples: How a new
identity-based state can be established in Australia.
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
6
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2222)
Australian Journal of Political Science 55: 311
–
27.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Buell, Paul D. 2011. Tibetans, Mongols and the fusion
of Eurasian cultures. In Islam and Tibet: Interactions
Along the Musk Routes, 1st ed. Edited by Anna Akasoy,
Charles Burnett and Ronit Yoeli-Tlalim. London and
New York: Routledge, pp. 189
–
208. [Google Scholar]
Buell, Paul D., and Judith Kolbas. 2016. The ethos of
state and society in the early Mongol Empire: Chinggis
Khan to Güyük. Journal of The Royal Asiatic Society 26:
43
–
64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Burgess, Michael. 2012. Multinational federalism in
multinational federation. In Multinational Federalism,
1st ed. Edited by Michel Seymour and Alain-G. Gagnon.
London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 23
–
44. [Google
Scholar] [CrossRef]
Choi, Soyoung. 2022. From Brutes to Bodhisattvas: The
Mongols in Tibetan sources. In The Mongol World, 1st
ed. Edited by Timothy Michael May and Michael Hope.
Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 799
–
813.
[Google Scholar]
Crocenzi, Mauro. 2019. The historical development of
Tibetan ‘minzu’ identity through Chinese eyes: A
preliminary analysis. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 51: 99–
118. [Google Scholar]
Cyr, Hugo. 2014. Autonomy, subsidiarity, solidarity:
Foundations of cooperative federalism. Constitutional
Forum/Forum Constitutionnel 23: 20. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef]
De Villiers, Bertus. 2016. Community government for
minority groups
–
revisiting the ideas of Bauer and
Renner towards developing a model of self-
government by minority groups under public law.
Zeitschrift Für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht Und
Völkerrecht 76: 909
–
49. [Google Scholar]
Elazar, Daniel J. 1985. Federalism and consociational
regimes. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 15: 17
–
34.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Elazar, Daniel J. 1987. Exploring Federalism, 1st ed.
Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. [Google
Scholar]
Elazar, Daniel J. 1997. Contrasting unitary and federal
systems. International Political Science Review 18:
237
–
51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fan, Baoliang. 1992. Mengzang Guanxishi Yanjiu
[Research on the History of Mongolian-Tibetan
Relations], 1st ed. Qinghai: Qinghai People’s Publishing
House. [Google Scholar]
