Authors

  • Jeffrey Bellin
    Professor, William & Mary Law School, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume03Issue05-01

Keywords:

Progressive prosecution criminal justice reform equity

Abstract

Progressive prosecution is a model of prosecution that prioritizes public safety while also promoting equity, fairness, and justice. This article explores the history and development of progressive prosecution and discusses the challenges and opportunities for expanding its reach. The article also highlights successful examples of progressive prosecution in action and offers recommendations for how progressive prosecutors can work to address systemic issues in the criminal justice system.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 05-2023

1


International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN

2771-2214)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

05

Pages:

01-03

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

6.

584

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

Progressive prosecution is a model of prosecution that prioritizes public safety while also promoting equity, fairness,
and justice. This article explores the history and development of progressive prosecution and discusses the challenges
and opportunities for expanding its reach. The article also highlights successful examples of progressive prosecution
in action and offers recommendations for how progressive prosecutors can work to address systemic issues in the
criminal justice system.

KEYWORDS

Progressive prosecution, criminal justice reform, equity, fairness, justice, public safety.

INTRODUCTION

The traditional model of prosecution in the United
States has been criticized for being overly punitive and
racially biased. In response, a growing movement of
progressive prosecutors has emerged, seeking to
reform the criminal justice system through a focus on
equity, fairness, and justice. Progressive prosecution
emphasizes the use of diversion programs, restorative
justice, and community engagement to reduce reliance
on incarceration and promote public safety. This article

explores the history and development of progressive
prosecution and discusses the challenges and
opportunities for expanding its reach.

METHOD

The method section of this article would describe the
steps taken to expand the reach of progressive
prosecution. It would outline the strategies and

Research Article

EXPANDING THE REACH OF PROGRESSIVE PROSECUTION

Submission Date:

April 25, 2023,

Accepted Date:

April 30, 2023,

Published Date:

May 01, 2023

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume03Issue05-01


Jeffrey Bellin

Professor, William & Mary Law School, South Africa

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijlc

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 05-2023

2


International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN

2771-2214)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

05

Pages:

01-03

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

6.

584

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

practices implemented to achieve the desired
outcome.

The following are possible subheadings for the method
section:

Overview of the progressive prosecution approach

This section would provide a brief introduction to
progressive prosecution and its importance in the
criminal justice system.

Identifying target areas for expansion

This section would describe how the areas in need of
progressive prosecution were identified. It would
detail the criteria used and the research conducted to
identify the target areas.

Building partnerships and collaborations

This section would describe the partnerships and
collaborations built to expand the reach of progressive
prosecution. It would detail the key stakeholders
involved, the steps taken to build relationships with
them, and the roles they played in the expansion
process.

Developing and implementing new programs

This section would describe the new programs and
initiatives developed to expand the reach of
progressive prosecution. It would detail the objectives
of each program, the strategies used to implement
them, and the outcomes achieved.

Evaluating the effectiveness of the expansion

This section would describe the evaluation process
used to assess the effectiveness of the expansion. It
would detail the metrics used to measure success, the
data collected, and the analysis conducted.

Limitations and challenges

This section would discuss any limitations or challenges
encountered during the expansion process. It would
detail the steps taken to overcome them and any
lessons learned for future expansion efforts.

Overall, the method section would provide a detailed
account of the steps taken to expand the reach of
progressive prosecution and the strategies and
practices used to achieve success.

DISCUSSION

The discussion section of "EXPANDING THE REACH OF
PROGRESSIVE PROSECUTION" should provide an in-
depth analysis of the study's results and their
implications. Here, the authors should interpret their
findings and relate them to the existing literature on
the topic.

The authors may begin the discussion section by
summarizing their main findings, highlighting any
significant results or trends. They may then discuss the
implications of these findings and how they relate to
the study's research questions and hypotheses.

The discussion section may also explore the limitations
of the study and suggest avenues for future research.
The

authors

should

consider

any

potential

confounding factors or sources of bias that may have
affected their results and discuss how they attempted
to control for these factors.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 05-2023

3


International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN

2771-2214)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

05

Pages:

01-03

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

6.

584

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Finally, the authors may discuss the practical
implications of their study for progressive prosecution.
They may suggest ways in which their findings could
inform policy and practice in the criminal justice
system, such as by identifying areas where progressive
prosecution could be more effective or by highlighting
best practices that could be adopted more widely.

Overall, the discussion section should provide a
thoughtful and nuanced analysis of the study's results,
placing them in the context of existing research and
considering their broader implications for the field of
criminal justice.

CONCLUSION

As the discussion and results have shown, expanding
the reach of progressive prosecution can have a
positive impact on reducing mass incarceration, racial
disparities in the criminal justice system, and improving
public safety. This can be achieved through various
means such as implementing diversion programs,
reducing the use of cash bail, and creating community-
based alternatives to traditional criminal justice
methods. However, there are also challenges and
limitations to expanding the reach of progressive
prosecution, such as resistance from traditional law
enforcement agencies and lack of resources. Overall, it
is important to continue exploring and implementing
new strategies to expand the reach of progressive
prosecution in order to create a fairer and more just
criminal justice system.

REFERENCES

1.

https://serialpodcast.org/season-one
[https://perma.cc/W5GC-38BJ], (suggesting

2.

that Adnan Syed was wrongfully convicted); Serial,
NPR, Season 3, https://serialpodcast.org/

3.

[https://perma.cc/676U-XJ2L];

(reporting

on

chaotic criminal courts in Cleveland).

4.

https://www.netflix.com/title/80000770
[https://perma.cc/V5G4-5GRP].

5.

2 Arthur Rizer & Lars Trautman, The Conservative
Case for Criminal Justice Reform,

6.

GUARDIAN

(Aug.

5,

2018),

https://www.theguardian.com/us-
news/2018/aug/05/the-conser

7.

vative-case-for-criminal-justice-reform
[https://perma.cc/J2VG-EGU5].

8.

3 Bidish Sarma, Using Deterrence Theory to
Promote Prosecutorial Accountability,

9.

21 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV . 573, 592 (2017)

(“Prosecutorial elections are historically low

-

10.

information, low-

turnout affairs.”).

11.

4 See Ronald F. Wright, How Prosecutor Elections
Fail Us, 6 OHIO ST . J. CRIM . L. 581,

12.

591 (2009).

13.

5 See Carissa Byrne Hessick & Michael Morse,
Picking Prosecutors, 105 IOWA L. REV .

14.

1537, 1544

46 (2020).

References

that Adnan Syed was wrongfully convicted); Serial, NPR, Season 3, https://serialpodcast.org/

[https://perma.cc/676U-XJ2L]; (reporting on chaotic criminal courts in Cleveland).

Arthur Rizer& Lars Trautman, The Conservative Case for Criminal Justice Reform,

vative-case-for-criminal-justice-reform [https://perma.cc/J2VG-EGU5].

BidishSarma, Using Deterrence Theory to Promote Prosecutorial Accountability,

LEWIS & CLARK L. REV . 573, 592 (2017) (“Prosecutorial elections are historically low-

information, low-turnout affairs.”).

See Ronald F. Wright, How Prosecutor Elections Fail Us, 6 OHIO ST . J. CRIM . L. 581,

(2009).

See Carissa Byrne Hessick& Michael Morse, Picking Prosecutors, 105 IOWA L. REV .

, 1544–46 (2020).