Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
13
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
The peculiarity of disputes related to foreign persons is the existence of the need to perform some procedural actions
abroad when considering cases of this category. Including gathering of evidence, notifying foreign persons staying
abroad about the time and place of the trial, measures to secure the claim abroad, in addition, the regulation of
material legal relations in dispute with foreign persons by foreign law or international law, etc.
KEYWORDS
Foreign Persons, foreign law, international law.
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 32 of the Economic Procedural Code (Articles
244-247) is called "Features of hearing cases involving
foreign persons", it describes the procedure for
hearing cases involving foreign persons, procedural
rights
and
obligations
of
foreign
persons,
requirements
for
foreign
documents,
certain
procedural actions there is talk about court orders for
execution.
According to I.M. Shevchenko, the universally
recognized principle and universally binding rule of
international law is the principle of respect for state
sovereignty and state sovereignty. Each state is
considered to be the owner of full power in its
territory.
Therefore,
considering
that
the
administration of justice is an act of state sovereignty,
the courts of the national state outside the state are
Research Article
CHARACTERISTICS OF CONSIDERING CASES INVOLVING FOREIGN
PERSONS IN COURT
Submission Date:
Sep 29, 2024,
Accepted Date:
Oct 04, 2024,
Published Date:
Oct 09, 2024
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume04Issue10-03
Sultanov Muhiddin Polotjonovich
Deputy chairman of the Tashkent Interdistrict Economic Court of Tashkent city, Independent researcher of the
Higher School of Judges under the Supreme Council of Judges of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijlc
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
14
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
deprived of their legal authority and cannot perform
any judicial action in another state.
Therefore, the economic courts of the Republic of
Uzbekistan should take into account the laws of
foreign countries and the regulation of these relations
with the help of international law when considering
cases related to foreign persons.Otherwise, the court
decision may be annulled or the execution of this
decision in the territory of a foreign country may be
refused.
In order to determine the characteristics of cases
involving foreign persons, it is necessary to study the
legislation in the field of economic process and
international private law, international agreements in
which the Republic of Uzbekistan has participated or
not. International agreements can be universal or
regional, multilateral or bilateral.
The Economic Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall
consider cases involving foreign persons, unless
otherwise stipulated in the international agreement of
the Republic of Uzbekistan, according to the provisions
of this Code, taking into account the features provided
for in this chapter. Judging from the content of the first
part of Article 244 of the EPC, it is considered on the
basis of the general rules of national legislation, taking
into account the special features. This includes
submission of claims and documents that must be
attached to them, procedural rights and obligations of
the parties, court proceedings, procedural terms,
decisions, rulings, their execution, etc.
However, due to the fact that the foreign organization
is registered in another country, the head office is
located in another region, and it takes time to contact
them, so there is a difference in the deadlines for
processing cases. "Extended periods" are actually an
opportunity given to foreign persons to protect their
rights and legal interests. This aspect of procedural law
is followed by the laws of all countries. Due to the fact
that there is a difference in terms of territory, court
notices do not arrive within the time limit set by the
general rules, the cases may be left unheard by the
courts.
Cases with the participation of foreign persons, if these
persons or their branches, representative offices or
their authorized representatives are located or live in
the territory of the Republic of Uzbekistan, are
considered within the time limits specified in this Code.
In cases where the foreign persons participating in the
case are notified in accordance with the procedure
established by the international agreement of the
Republic of Uzbekistan, the period of consideration of
the case shall be extended to the period established by
the international agreement of the Republic of
Uzbekistan for sending court orders, and if such a
period is not included in the agreement or if the
specified agreement does not exist, it shall be
extended for a period of no more than six months.
There are also peculiarities in the issue of jurisdiction in
cases involving foreign persons. In some cases,
according to the agreement specified in the contract or
disputes related to the powers of a foreign country
may not be considered by the economic courts of the
Republic of Uzbekistan. International jurisdiction
refers to the powers of the economic courts of the
Republic of Uzbekistan, which allow to distinguish
cases involving foreign persons from the powers of the
courts of other countries. In the absence of an
agreement on relevancy, the general rules of relevance
and admissibility of proceedings established in the EPC
of cases with the participation of foreign persons shall
be applied.
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
15
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
According to M.A. Agalarova, the term of belonging to
the international court allows to determine the
competence of the court or other div to consider and
resolve the dispute involving the foreign element. But
nevertheless, it emphasizes that national jurisdiction is
not a "separate" form, but rather a mechanism for
determining the jurisdiction of the court.
Foreign citizenship, residence abroad, or the location
of an organization owned by a particular person, the
place where the contract is executed or the place of
damage determines in advance that the conflicting
legal relations will be regulated by the national legal
regimes of different countries. In each country, the
legislature independently determines the competent
courts and the limits of international jurisdiction.
The exclusive powers of the economic courts of the
Republic of Uzbekistan in cases involving foreign
persons provided for in Article 240 of the Criminal Code
cannot be changed by agreement of the parties. This is
a strict rule. However, if the international agreement of
the Republic of Uzbekistan stipulates different
provisions than those stipulated by the legislation of
the Republic of Uzbekistan, the provisions of the
international agreement shall be applied. (IPC Article 1
Part Three)
Current and customary rules for most legal systems
apply to jurisdiction over jurisdiction: claims are usually
filed in the jurisdiction of the defendant entity or the
defendant citizen's residence.
According to the first part of Article 21 of the FC, the
place of residence of a citizen is the place where the
citizen lives permanently or mainly. According to
Article 46 of this Code, the location of a legal entity is
determined by the place of state registration, unless
otherwise specified in the founding documents of the
legal entity.
The powers of the economic courts of the Republic of
Uzbekistan on cases involving foreign persons listed in
Article 239 of the EPC can be interpreted very broadly.
In fact, this is an advantage of the legislation. In the
legislation of many foreign countries, the criteria on
this issue are somewhat limited. In most cases,
jurisdiction in foreign law is determined by the
defendant's nationality (France, Italy) or the
defendant's place of residence (Germany). At the same
time, in common law countries, the question of
jurisdiction is decided on the basis of the formal
principle, that is, the fact that the defendant has the
possibility of being served with the court decision
(England).
It is worth noting that, in recent years, such different
national legal systems on this issue have been unified
(integrated) on the basis of international legal
documents. As an example, the most famous
international legal document is the Brussels
Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of
Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, adopted in
1968. The Convention specifies one criterion for the
above issue - the defendant's place of residence.
The list of competences of economic courts in handling
cases involving foreign persons provided in EPC
prevents the aforementioned uncertainty and
confusion, and provides clear instructions on the issue
of entities. When submitting an application to the
court, the claimant is given the opportunity to apply to
the court of his choice using the list specified in Article
239 of the Criminal Code. For example, if the claimant
in the business reputation protection case resides in
the Republic of Uzbekistan, this dispute will be heard
in the economic courts of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
In general, a clause-by-clause specification of powers
helps to avoid inconsistencies in jurisdictional matters.
Approaching them as special rules, we can only look at
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
16
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
them as a complement to the rules about the place of
residence. When the claimant applies to the economic
court to resolve disputes related to foreign persons,
the first part of Article 239 of the EPC
The circumstances provided for in clauses 1-10, that is,
the existence of a civil-legal relationship related to the
territory of the Republic of Uzbekistan, are considered
sufficient. Examples of these are the location of the
defendant, the place of fulfillment of the terms of the
contract, the place of damage to property or
unjustified wealth gain, the place of issuance of
securities, the state registration of names, the place of
service on the Internet global information network,
etc. It should be noted that the forms of civil-legal
relations may be more and different than those listed
in this article, and therefore we cannot say that this list
is complete.
The Economic Procedural Code of the Republic of
Uzbekistan contains special articles specifying the
powers of economic courts in cases involving foreign
persons, procedural rights and obligations of foreign
persons, requirements for foreign documents.
However, at the same time, the above-mentioned rules
and their practical application have not been
comprehensively and systematically analyzed in the
scientific literature, the conflicts between international
and national law have not been resolved theoretically
and practically, the participation of translators and
lawyers in determining the content of foreign law,
informing foreign persons , there are significant
problems in terms of time and other issues in
processing cases related to foreign persons.
In Uzbekistan, the mechanism of interaction between
the state authorities and the state authorities of
foreign countries is not well established. The
mechanism for providing legal aid and submitting a
questionnaire is almost non-existent. Uzbekistan's
agreements on legal assistance with many countries
serve only as a legal basis, the procedure for their
practical application is not established in any
regulatory document.
The economic courts of the Republic of Uzbekistan
may refer to the courts of foreign countries or
competent bodies of foreign countries with court
orders to perform certain procedural actions in
accordance with the procedure established by the
international agreement of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Jurisdiction is an important issue when submitting
lawsuits to economic courts by foreign persons. The
classic method of suing the defendant is to apply to the
court of his location. However, in this category of
cases, foreign persons may not have a branch in the
territory of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Also, in the
terms of the contract or with a separate agreement,
the courts that will resolve disputes that may arise in
the future may be specified. Documents in a foreign
language are attached to a claim by foreign persons.
Translations are made by experts, with the help of
notaries and other organizations. In order to use
translated documents in court, the documents must be
translated by a licensed specialist and certified by a
notary. Some documents may require a more
complicated process, i.e. legalization and apostille.
According to Article 10 of the EPC, participants of court
proceedings who do not know the language in which
court proceedings are conducted have the right to
familiarize themselves with case materials through an
interpreter, participate in court actions, and speak in
court in their native language or freely chosen
language of communication. When it is necessary to
use the services of an interpreter during the trial, a
problem arises in the courts in this regard. First of all,
the fact that the judge himself does not know the
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
17
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
foreign language spoken by the foreigner participating
in the case is considered a problematic situation, and it
should be mentioned that a special base of translators,
tested and classified according to their experience or
specialization, has not been formed in Uzbekistan.
Secondly, solving the issue of ensuring the
participation of an interpreter in court proceedings by
the court also takes time procedurally. This, of course,
causes the case to be delayed due to adjournments and
adjournments. There is a gap in procedural law on this
issue.
The register of the tax office can be used to determine
the existence of a branch or representative office of a
foreign organization. Courts must determine whether
a foreign organization has a representative office
when conducting business, especially when informing
about the time and place of work. This causes the cases
involving foreign persons to be considered and
resolved within the general terms.
We will dwell on the problems encountered in the
practice of courts in the process of accepting and
preparing lawsuits involving foreign persons.
On January 6, 2020, the Law of the Republic of
Uzbekistan "On State Duty" came into force. In
accordance with Article 5 of this Law, a state duty in
the amount of twice the amount of the base
calculation is charged for the applications for
recognition and enforcement of the decisions of
foreign courts and arbitrations. Foreigners request to
pay court costs in foreign currency they have, since
they do not have the national currency of the Republic
of Uzbekistan in their account, they face the first
obstacle when submitting an application.
Of course, in the eighth part of Article 17 of this Law, if
the value of the claim and the amount of the contract
are determined in foreign currency, the amount of the
state duty shall be determined and collected in the
national currency at the rate determined by the Central
Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan on the date of the
action. But we cannot say that this rule is a basis for the
recognition and enforcement of foreign court and
arbitration decisions. Special consideration should be
given to foreign persons applying to legal documents
related to the collection of court costs in matters other
than filing a lawsuit (recognition, enforcement).
When economic courts send a ruling on the assignment
of a case to foreign persons, the ruling may be returned
from the foreign address of the defendant because he
is not at this address. According to the second part of
Article 128 of the EPC, if the extract of the ruling sent
by the court on the last address (postal address) of the
legal entity known to the court, the citizen's place of
residence was not delivered due to the fact that the
recipient is not at the specified address, and the
communication institution informed the court about
this, the economic court the participant in the
proceedings shall be deemed duly informed by the
court. In this case, the judge is obliged to consider the
case without the participation of the defendant,
because the length of consideration of this category of
cases is extended for a period of no more than six
months.
Also, in the practice of the courts, it is possible to meet
cases where court assignments sent to a foreign
country with a request to perform a certain procedural
action are not returned at all. In such cases, there is no
regulatory legal document stating that the judge's
actions or inactions are not against the law.
In cases where the parties involved in the case are
residents of Uzbekistan, the court staff will determine
the additional information of the parties through the
website www.stat.uz and try to resend the decision on
postponing the hearing of the case to the specified
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
18
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
address or contact them through other means of
communication. This works in most cases. But this is
not possible in cases involving foreign persons. With
the help of international agreements, it would be
appropriate to create a database of all world economic
entities and to use it for information on foreign
persons participating in the work.
At this point, we think that we should adopt the
practice of "reserve date" used by the Russian
Federation in assigning cases in cases related to
foreign persons to our procedural legislation.
According to this practice, the initial and main dates of
the trial are determined in one ruling. If the foreign
person participating in the case receives this ruling late
due to objective reasons and cannot make it to the
initial date of the trial, he/she participates in the court
session held on the main date himself or through a
representative. This will prevent procedural violations.
As a logical continuation of this idea, we can also say
about postponing the hearing of the case. According
to the second part of Article 171 of the EPC, the trial can
be postponed for the period necessary to eliminate the
circumstances that served as the basis for its
postponement within the period provided for the trial
in this Code, but not more than ten days. But the ten-
day period will not be enough to deliver the ruling on
postponing the case to foreign persons. Therefore, we
believe that it is correct to include the situation related
to a foreign person in this norm of the EPC as an
exception.
Another
interesting
situation
is
related
to
representatives and powers of attorney. In most cases,
foreign persons prefer to participate in economic
courts through their representatives. Recently, there
are many cases where the legal fees paid to the
representative of the foreign plaintiff, whose powers
have been formalized in the appropriate manner, are
also included in the payment of the legal fees paid
when submitting a claim to the court. We believe that
the procedural solution of this issue should be
reflected in the EPC. According to the provision
established in Article 63 of the EPC, the powers of
proceedings in court give the representative the right
to perform all procedural actions on behalf of the
person who represented him. But the performance of
the actions listed in the first part of this article must be
specifically provided for in the power of attorney. In
court practice, there are also cases where the power of
attorney of a foreigner does not meet this
requirement, and the claim submitted by the
representative was returned because it was signed by
a person who did not have the right to sign it. The
arguments of the foreign claimant that the general
terms "all procedural actions", "submitting a claim" in
the power of attorney given to the representative,
actually include signing the claim, were not taken into
account.
Since there is no mechanism for collection of state duty
at the expense of foreign persons, the courts are
forced to reject requests for delay in payment of state
duty and payment in installments. Of course, in EPC it
is listed as the judge's right. Nevertheless, in our
opinion, this violates the criterion of foreign persons
enjoying equal procedural rights with residents of
Uzbekistan.
In addition, according to our national legislation, it is
established that the company whose account number
is in the card file can apply to the court by presenting a
bank statement proving that there are no funds in the
account. This bank statement must be submitted to
the court within 3 days. But in the practice of courts,
foreign persons do not have time to present the bank
reference to the court due to the distance. Therefore,
such short periods are the reason for their rightful
objections that they violate their rights.
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
19
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
In the third part of Article 244 of the EPC, it is
established that in the case of cases involving foreign
persons, if a court order to notify the party in a foreign
country is sent by the courts, it will be extended for a
period of not more than six months. However, even if
there are branches, representative offices of foreign
persons or their authorized representatives in the
Republic of Uzbekistan, cases are considered within six
months, and it can be seen that a practice of non-
observance of the procedural rules has been formed.
In order to ensure the correct and uniform application
of EPC norms in this regard, we think it is appropriate
to submit a proposal to the decision of the Plenum in
the future.
In accordance with Article 164 of the Criminal Code, the
trial must be completed within a period of no more
than one month from the date of issuance of the
decision to prepare the case for trial. In exceptional
cases, the term of the trial may be extended by the
chairman of the court for a period not exceeding one
month. Trial proceedings involving foreign persons
may not be completed in a period not exceeding six
months. According to the general rule, the chairman of
the court has the right to extend the term of the trial
using his authority. In the practice of the courts, the
chairman of the court extends the term of the trial by
one month, but the peculiarity of the foreigner means
that even this term is insufficient. Therefore, Article 164
of the Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure needs to
specify and strengthen the chairman's authority to
extend the term in cases involving foreign persons. It
would be appropriate to set the extension period to a
period not exceeding six months.
At this point, we would like to draw your attention to
the amendment to Article 253 of the Arbitration
Procedure Code of the Russian Federation introduced
on October 1, 2019. According to it, consideration of
cases involving foreign persons, if the foreign persons
do not have branches or representative offices in the
Russian Federation, is determined to be extended for a
period of no more than one year. We also consider this
period of not more than one year to be a reasonable
period and suggest that it be included in the procedural
legislation. This will certainly prevent the violation of
procedural law by the courts, and will allow for
sufficient separation of the deadlines for notifying the
parties.
It is known to everyone that the practice of conducting
court hearings in the mode of video conferencing and
submitting claims through the electronic system has
already developed in the courts of Uzbekistan. The
idea of establishing virtual courts in the digitization of
the judicial system is being promoted by the Higher
School of Judges. Recently, due to the pandemic that
shook the whole world, quarantine restrictions were
applied, and all communications began to be carried
out via the Internet. Remote participation of the court
and other participants through virtual court chats leads
to time savings, a sharp reduction in the costs of the
parties' arrival from foreign countries, and full
provision of the participation of the parties in the
courts. We fully support the application of this
innovation to cases involving foreign persons. Because
the arrival and departure of a foreign person to the
country where the trial is held, residence and other
formalities require a lot of time and money. For this
reason, we are confident that a foreigner will choose
to participate from their home country by paying the
court fees charged for virtual court chats. We hope to
protect the rights and legal interests of citizens and
legal entities by introducing the practice of virtual
court chats, which has not been tried in any country in
the world, for the first time in our country.
REFERENCES
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
20
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Regulatory and legal documents:
1.
Ўзбекистон
Республикасининг
Конституцияси. –Т.: “Ўзбекистон” НМИУ, 2019.
https://www.lex.uz/acts/20596
2.
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг И
қ
тисодий
процессуал
кодекси
:
Расмий
нашр
–
Ўзбекистон
Республикаси
Адлия
вазирлиги
.
–Т
.:
Адолат
, 2018.
www.lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/3523891
3.
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг Фу
қ
аролик
кодекси
.
Расмий
нашр
–
Ўзбекистон Республикаси
Адлия вазирлиги. –Т.: Адолат, 2014. www.lex.uz.
https://lex.uz/docs/111189
4.
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг Фу
қ
аролик
процессуал
кодекси
:
Расмий
нашр
–
Ўзбекистон
Республикаси
Адлия
вазирлиги
.
–Т
.:
Адолат
, 2018.
https://lex.uz/docs/3517337
5.
Ўзбекистон
Республикасининг
Хўжалик
процессуал кодекси: https://www.lex.uz/docs/185986
6.
Ўзбекистон
Республикасининг
Соли
қ
кодекси
. https://lex.uz/mobileact/1286558
7.
Ўзбекистон
Республикасининг
“Судлар
тў
ғ
рисида”ги
қ
онуни
. https://lex.uz/acts/68532
8.
Ўзбекистон
Республикасининг
“Инвестициялар
ва
инвестиция
фаолият
тў
ғ
рисида”ги
қ
онуни
. . https://lex.uz/docs/4664142
9.
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг “Давлат божи
тў
ғ
рисида”ги
қ
онуни
.
https://www.lex.uz/docs/4680944
10.
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг “Ўзбекистон
Республикасининг
хал
қ
аро
шартномалари
тў
ғ
рисида”ги
қ
онуни
. https://lex.uz/docs/4193761
11.
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг “Ўзбекистон
Республикасининг фу
қ
аролиги
тў
ғ
рисида”ги
қ
онуни
.
https://lex.uz/docs/6300.
12.
Ўзбекистон
Республикасининг
“Суд
ҳ
ужжатлари ва бош
қ
а
органлар
ҳ
ужжатларини
ижро
қ
илиш
тў
ғ
рисида”ги
қ
онуни
.
https://lex.uz/docs/26477
13.
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Президентининг
“Ўзбекистон
Республикасининг
фу
қ
аролик
қ
онунчилигини
такомиллаштириш
чора
-
тадбирлари
тў
ғ
рисида”
2019
йил
5
апрелдаги
Ф
-5464-
сонли
фармойиши. https://lex.uz/docs/4272621
14.
Ўзбекистон
Республикаси
Олий
суди
Раёсатининг “И
қ
тисодий
судлар
томонидан
2017
йил
ва
2018
йилнинг
биринчи
ярми
мобайнида
чет
эллик
инвесторлар
ва
чет
эл
инвестициялари
иштирокидаги
корхоналар
фаолияти билан бо
ғ
ли
қ
ишларни
кўриш
бўйича
суд
амалиётини
умумлаштириш
натижалари
ҳ
а
қ
ида”гиг
2018
йил
28
сентябрдаги
№РС
-50-18-
сонли
қ
арори
.
http://www.oliysud.uz
15.
Ўзбекистон
Республикаси
Олий
суди
Раёсатининг “Чет давлатлар судларининг ва
арбитражларининг
ҳ
ал
қ
илув
қ
арорларини
тан
олиш
ва
ижрога
қ
аратиш
бўйича
суд
амалиётини
умумлаштириш
натижалари
ҳ
а
қ
ида”ги
2019
йил
1
мартдаги
РС
-13-19-
сон
қ
арори
. http://www.oliysud.uz
16.
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий хўжалик
суди пленумининг “Чет давлат суди ёки
ҳ
акамлик
қ
арорини
тан
олиш
ва
ижрога
қ
аратиш
ҳ
амда
чет
давлат
судининг
топшири
ғ
ини
ижро
этиш
тў
ғ
рисидаги
ишларнинг
хўжалик
судлари
томонидан
кўрилишида
қ
онун
ҳ
ужжатларини
қ
ўллашнинг
айрим
масалалари
ҳ
а
қ
ида”ги
248-
сонли
Қ
арори
.
(
ҳ
ужжат
ўз
кучини
йў
қ
отган
)
https://www.lex.uz/docs/2207329
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
21
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
17.
Ўзбекистон
Республикаси
Олий
суди
Пленуми ва Олий хўжалик суди Пленумининг “Суд
ҳ
ужжатларини
ижро
этишга
оид
қ
онун
ҳ
ужжатларини
қ
ўллаш бўйича суд амалиётининг
айрим масалалари тў
ғ
рисида”ги
2009
йил
10
апрелдаги
06/196-
сонли
қ
арори
.
International and foreign state documents:
18.
«Инсон
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
лари
ва
асосий
эркинликларини
ҳ
имоя
қ
илиш
тў
ғ
рисида»ги
Конвенция
. (
Рим
, 4
ноябрь
, 1950
йил
) http://base.garant.ru/2540800/
19.
Чет эл арбитражлари
қ
арорларини
тан
олиш
ва
ижрога
қ
аратиш
тў
ғ
рисида
Нью
-
Йорк
конвенцияси
.
1958
йил
10
июнь
.
https://lex.uz/docs/2009040
20.
Фу
қ
аролик
процесси
масалалари
тў
ғ
рисида
Конвенция
.
1954
йил
1
март
,
Гаага
.
https://lex.uz/docs/2702077
21.
Хельсинкский Заключительный акт. 1 августа
1975
года.
https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/0/c/39505_1.p
df
22.
Хал
қ
аро
шартномалар
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
и
тў
ғ
рисида
Вена
конвенцияси
.
23
май
1969
й
.
https://lex.uz/docs/2646376
23.
Брюссельская Конвенция по вопросам
юрисдикции
и
принудительного
исполнения
судебных решений в отношении гражданских и
коммерческих споров. 27 сентября 1968 года.
https://www.lawmix.ru/abro/643
24.
Хўжалик фаолиятини амалга ошириш билан
бо
ғ
ли
қ
низоларни
ҳ
ал
қ
илиш
тартиби
тў
ғ
рисида
Битим.
1992
йил
20
март,
Киев.
https://www.lex.uz/ru/docs/2654267
25.
Фу
қ
аролик
,
оилавий
ва
жиноий
ишлар
бўйича
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
ий
ёрдам
ва
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
ий
муносабатлар
тў
ғ
рисида
Конвенция
. 1993
йил
22
январь
,
Минск
.
https://lex.uz/docs/2741652
26.
Протокол к Конвенции
о правовой помощи и
правовых отношениях по гражданским, семейным и
уголовным делам от 22 января 1993 года (Москва, 28
марта
1997
года).
http://to64.minjust.gov.ru/ru/node/287605
27.
Фу
қ
аролик
,
оилавий
ва
жиноий
ишлар
бўйича
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
ий
ёрдам
ва
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
ий
муносабатлар
тў
ғ
рисида
Конвенция
. 7
октябрь
2002
йил
.
Кишинёв
.
https://nrm.uz/contentf?doc=216184_&products=1_vse
_zakonodatelstvo_uzbekistana
28.
Турли давлатларнинг хўжалик юритувчи
субъектлари ўртасидаги хўжалик низоларини
ҳ
ал
этишда
давлат
божлари
ми
қ
дори
ва уни ундириб
олиш тартиби тў
ғ
рисида
Битим
. 1993
йил
24
декабрь
,
Ашхобод
. https://www.lex.uz/docs/2900595
29.
Протокол
к
Соглашению
о
размере
государственной пошлины и порядке ее взыскания
при рассмотрении хозяйственных споров между
субъектами хозяйствования разных государств от
24
декабря
1993
года
http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901852448
30.
Протокол
к
Соглашению
о
размере
государственной пошлины и порядке ее взыскания
при рассмотрении хозяйственных споров между
субъектами хозяйствования разных государств от
24
декабря
1993
года
http://docs.cntd.ru/document/499082053
31.
Европада хавфсизлик ва
ҳ
амкорлик
кенгаши
доирасидаги
муросага
келтириш
ва
ҳ
акамлик
тў
ғ
рисида
Конвенция
. 1992
йил
15
декабрь
,
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
22
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Стокгольм
.
https://lex.uz/ru/docs/2686745?otherlang=1
32.
Румыния
Гражданский
кодекс
(2009).
https://pravo.hse.ru › 2019/03/20 › ГК Румынии МЧП
(ред. 2016).pdf
33.
Закон Грузии о международном частном
праве
1998
г.
https://pravo.hse.ru/intprilaw/doc/050301
34.
Защита
иностарнных
инвестиций
в
Аргентине.
https://iqdecision.com/zashhita-inostrannyh-investicij-
v-argentine/
35.
Закон Азербайджанской Республики. 6 июня
2000 года. №889
-
IГ О международном частном
праве.
http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=2633
36.
Закон Франции о правах иностранных
граждан.
7
март
2016
года
.
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/passeport_talent_vfs_
russe-2.pdf
37.
Арбитражный
процессуальный
кодекс
Российской Федерации. https://rulaws.ru/apk/.
38.
Федеральный закон "О внесении изменений
в отдельные законодательные акты Российской
Федерации"
от
28.11.2018
№
451
-
ФЗ
http://base.garant.ru/77564051/
Scientific literature and articles:
39.
И
қ
тисодий
процессуал
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
.
Дарслик
/
Масъул
му
ҳ
аррир
ю
.
ф
.
д
.
З
.
Н
.
Эсанова
.
Муаллифлар
жамоаси
.
–
Тошкент
:
ТДЮУ
, 2019. -524
б
.
40.
Ўзбекистон
Республикаси
Хўжалик
процессуал
кодексига
шар
ҳ
лар
.
Муаллифлар
жамоаси
:
М
.
Абдусаломов
,
М
.
Азимов
,
Х
.
Бурханходжаева
ва бош
қ
алар
. -
Т
:
“И
қ
тисодиёт
ва
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
дунёси”
нашриёт
уйи
. 2002
йил
.
41.
Отахонов
Ф.Х.
Хозяйственное
процессуальное право. Учебное пособие. –
Ташкент:
ТГЮИ, 2003.
42.
Арбитражный
процесс.
Под
реакцией
В.В.Яркова. Учебник 4
-
е изд., перераб. и доп. М.:
Инфотропик Медиа, 2010.
43.
Бердиёров Р.Т. Хўжалик процессуал
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
и
.
Ў
қ
ув
қ
ўлланма
.
Т
.:
ТДЮИ
, 2014.
44.
И
қ
тисодий
судларга
мурожаат
қ
илиш
тартиби
.
Амалий
қ
ўлланма
/
Қ
.
Комилов
,
М
.
Эргашев
.
–
Тошкент
: ILMIY-TEXNIKA AXBOROTI. PRESS
NASHRIYOTI, 2018. -232
б
.
45.
Инсон
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
лари
умумий
назарияси
:
Дарслик
.
—
Т
., 2012.
—
Муаллифлар
жамоаси
:
А
.
Х
.
Саидов
,
М
.
Т
.
Тур
ғ
унов
.
46.
А.X. Саидов. Европада хавфсизлик ва
ҳ
амкорлик
ташкилоти
:
инсонийлик
мезонлари
со
ҳ
асидаги
мажбуриятлар
.
Инсон
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
лари
бўйича
Ўзбекистон
Республикаси миллий маркази, 2012 й.
47.
О.Р.Сулаймонов. Хал
қ
аро
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
ий
ёрдам
кўрсатиш
бўйича
хал
қ
аро
шартномалар
тўплами
.
Т
.:
2017, 524
бет
.
39.
Н.П.Зарубина.
Частное
право
Японии.
Учебное пособие. 2016 г.
http://pnu.edu.ru/media/filer_public/2a/76/2a76f1d2-
bb35-4e3c-818b-ba27ba88ef48/zarubina-posobie-cp-
japan.pdf
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
23
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
13-23
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
40.
И.С.Искевич.
Международный
опыт
правового регулирования статуса иностранных
юридических
лиц
на
примере
стран
континентальной
правовой
ситемы.
2016.
https://cyberleninka.ru/journal/n/vestnik-
ekonomicheskoy-bezopasnosti
41.
А.А.Кольцов, Участие иностранных лиц в
российском арбитражном процессе. Автореферат
диссертации
на
соискание
ученой
степени
кандидата юридических наук. Саратов 2004.
http://lawtheses.com/uchastie-inostrannyh-lits-v-
rossiyskom-arbitrazhnom-protsesse
42.
Решетникова И. В. Решетникова И.В.
Арбитражный процесс / И. В. Решетникова, М. А.
Куликова, Е. А. Царегородцева.
-
2е изд., пересмотр.
-
М.: Норма : ИНФРА
-
М, 2017.
-
С. 368.
https://znanium.com/catalog/document?pid=752589
43.
Ярков.В.
Арбитражный
процесс.
Компендиум. Москва. 2011.
48.
Аюева Л.Г. Применение и исполнение норм
международных договоров российской федерации
в системе внутригосударственного права. Юристъ –
правоведъ.Научный журнал на тему: Право,
политологические науки, история и археология,
экономика и бизнес, науки об образовании. 2007 г.
39.
Б.Осминин. Заключение и имплементация
межународных
договоров
и
внутригосударственное право. (монография)–
М.:
2010 г
49.
Киселева
О.А.
Применение
норм
международных
договоров
в
практике
арбитражных
судов
Российской
Федерации.
Диссертация
на
соискание
ученой
степени
кандидата юридических наук. 2019 г.
50.
Шевченко И.М. Проблемы рассмотрения дел
с участием иностранных лиц в российском
арбитражном
процессе:
международная
подсудность,
судебные
извещения,
средства
доказывания. Автореферат. 2012 г.
51.
Агаларова М.А. Вопросы международной
подсудности в гражданском судопроизводстве.
Текст научной статьи по специальности «Право».
2016 г.
52.
Р. Исмаилова. Особенности исполнения
решений
экономического
суда
Республики
Узбекистан за рубежом. Правосудие. 11/2018 г.
http://sud.uz/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/ps-11-
son.pdf.
53.
И
қ
тисодий
судлар
томонидан
2017
йил
ва
2018
йилнинг
биринчи
ярми
мобайнида
чет
эллик
инвесторлар
ва
чет
эл
инвестициялари
иштирокидаги корхоналар фаолияти билан бо
ғ
ли
қ
ишларни
кўриш
бўйича
суд
амалиётини
умумлаштириш
натижалари
юзасидан
маълумотнома
