Volume 03 Issue 10-2023
44
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
(ISSN
–
2771-2834)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
10
Pages:
44-51
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
997
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
This article analyses the connection between syntax and morphology. It also deals with analysis of syntactic figures in
the English language, types of syntactic figures and their analysis. The importance of understanding types and ways
of correct connecting words in English syntax.
KEYWORDS
Syntax, morphology, syntactic figures, morpheme, government, agreement, adjoining.
INTRODUCTION
Syntax is one of the branches of grammar, which
organizes the relationship of words and sentences,
phrases and sentences. Learns the properties of
pieces.
In this respect, syntax differs from morphology.
Morphology examines the structure, construction,
type, and accentuation of words, and of course, this
formal examination is based on meaning. Syntax
studies the dynamics of these forms, their function,
their role in expressing a certain idea.
Morphology and syntax are complementary and
interrelated fields. The difference between the types
of sentences mainly depends on how the clauses are
expressed by the word group. Phrases are also
classified according to what word group the governing
clause is.
Syntax has a great role in studying the morphology of
English and Uzbek languages. Morphology studies the
division of words into morphemes, i.e. stem and affixal
morphemes, or the division of words into associative
and formal parts, while syntax studies methods of
Research Article
ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTIC FIGURES IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
Submission Date:
October 17, 2023,
Accepted Date:
October 22, 2023,
Published Date:
October 27, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume03Issue10-08
Tasheva Nafisa Zaynitdinovna
Asia International University Department Of History And Philology, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijll
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 03 Issue 10-2023
45
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
(ISSN
–
2771-2834)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
10
Pages:
44-51
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
997
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
forming word combinations to express our thoughts.
free and subordinate syntactic figures are combined.
In this work, the syntactic figures participating in the
interconnection of word combinations are compared
and the similarities and differences that exist in
languages of different systems, that is, belonging to
different families, for example, English belongs to the
Germanic language family, and Uzbek language
belongs to the Turkish language family, are identified.
We know that the Germanic languages belong to the
phyletic-synthetic languages, and the Uzbek language
belongs to the agglutinative analytical languages.
In the process of historical development, the modern
English language tends to analyze and analyze its
inflectional syntactic system of teaching words, that is,
the relationship between words is expressed by
auxiliary words, word composition in a sentence, etc.
Perfectives The role of the Imperfective Aspect is
performed by the Perfectives, which are common in
the language, non-Perfective tenses.
In syntax, the interconnection of words belonging to
independent groups based on the grammatical rules of
the language is based on subordination, and their
addition is based on equality.
For example:
1.
Кун исси
қ
2.
Исси
қ
кун
3.
The day is warm
4.
a warm day
5.
Куннинг исси
ғ
и
6.
The day`s heat
We see that in examples 1 and 3, a sentence is formed
as a result of connecting words. In examples 2, 4, 5, 6,
word combinations were formed as a result of
connecting words. It is not an equal connection
(syntagma) of words entering into an equal
relationship, but a coherent series (odnorodnye
ryady).
For example:
Тў
ғ
ри
ва
ҳ
а
ққ
оний
- right and real;
Кенг ва текис
- wide and straight.
Syntax is based on subordinating conjunction. Equal
communication is not overlooked.
Syntactic connection is usually understood as the
relationship between two words. In fact, syntactic
communication includes a broader concept than this. It
means the interconnection of words and phrases in a
sentence, as well as the connection of sentences with
each other using certain methods and tools.
Sometimes the term "syntactic relationship" is used
instead of the term "syntactic relationship" or these
two terms are used interchangeably, synonymously.
As a result, it is concluded that both terms represent
the same thing. A syntactic relationship with a correct
syntactic relationship is related to each other, where
there is a syntactic relationship, there is a syntactic
relationship. But this does not allow us to evaluate the
works as the same thing. Any syntactic relation is
different from syntactic relation.
Syntactic connection, as we said above, refers to the
mutual grammatical connection of words in a phrase
and a sentence, as well as clauses in a sentence.
Syntactic relationship refers to the grammatical
meaning and function of the words in the phrase and
sentence in relation to each other. For example: to go
Volume 03 Issue 10-2023
46
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
(ISSN
–
2771-2834)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
10
Pages:
44-51
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
997
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
home, to get you. In these examples, the syntactic
relationship is the same.
The elements in both compounds entered into the
control relation using the same grammatical vehicle-
direction agreement suffix. However, the syntactic
relationship of the elements in this combination cannot
be said to be the same. There are two types of
relationship. In the first compound, the case relation
(Place relation) is expressed, while in the second
compound, the object relation is expressed.
In a phrase, in a sentence, words can be connected in
two ways. Equally or subservient to one another.
Accordingly, syntactic relations are divided into two
main types. Equal relationship and subordinate
relationship.
Equal connection - occurs mainly on the basis of the
elements of the sentence.
(there cannot be an equal connection between the
elements of a word combination) The relation of
syntactically equal elements, one of which is not
subordinate to the other, is expressed by an equal
connection. So, through equal contact, cohesive pieces
are formed.
Cohesive pieces do not have any dominance over each
other. Accordingly, order does not play much of a role
for them. They can be used interchangeably.
In equal relations, words are connected to each other
using equal conjunctions (some auxiliaries and
prepositions can also be used in this task) or equal
intonation. Father and mother; Intonation is also
involved when close and close people, words come
into contact through equal conjunctions. But in this he
performs the function of an assistant.
Syntactically, the equal relationship expresses the
relation of words, one subordinate to the other, one
defining the other (in a broad sense). Dependent
relations are also found between the elements of the
phrase. In this case, one element is subordinate to the
other, and the syntactic relationship of the second to it
together forms a syntactic figure. For example: to go
to the door (eshikka-
tobe, khіlmoq
-hokim), to come
from the village (from the village-tobe, to come-
hokim), we read (we-hokim, to read-tobe). So, the
relation of the word combination and the parts of the
sentence is provided by the subordinate relation.
These are usually specific content as well. If the
elements of the phrase are arranged in the form of
"Subordinate word + governing word", the elements
of the sentence are arranged in the form of "dominant
word
+
subordinate
word".
Subordinate
communication is of three types. Government
(бош
қ
арув
), Agreement (
мослашув
)
ва
Adjoining
(
битишув
).
Government (management connection) In this
connection, the subordinate word enters a certain
form with the requirement of the word governor. A
subordinate word comes with either an agreement
suffix or an auxiliary. Accordingly, management
communication is divided into two types.
1. Consensus management
2. Assistive management
In conjunctive control, subordinate words are used in
one of the agreements of arrival, direction, place-time
and exit with the requirement of the governing word.
This is the symbol that indicates its dependency:
Who did you see?
Volume 03 Issue 10-2023
47
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
(ISSN
–
2771-2834)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
10
Pages:
44-51
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
997
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
In auxiliary rule, the word subordinate is used with an
auxiliary word at the request of the word ruler. This is
a sign of his subordination.
Dust is harmful to health.
I looked at my father.
Object and case relations are expressed through the
control connection.
To look at the garden (object relation) to go to the field
(case relation)
In a governing relationship, a subordinate word is a
noun or a noun, as well as an infinitive and an adjective.
A verb is often used in the function of the governing
word. However, nouns, adjectives, adverbs and other
words can also appear in this task. In this case, the
change of the governing word does not affect the
subordinate word.
Agreement (adaptive relationship) In this relationship,
the subordinate word makes its form equal to the form
of the governing word. When the form of the
governing word changes, the form of the subordinate
word also changes. The subordinate word adapts its
form to the form of the governing word. Therefore, the
change of the form of the governing word affects the
subordinate word. In this respect, it differs from
management communication. (the change of the form
of the governing word in the control relationship does
not affect the subordinate word.)
A predicative relation is mainly expressed through the
relation of adaptation.
A child plays; childen play
The relation of adaptation can also be found between
the elements in the composition of the phrase. It is
possible to see the relation of adaptation between the
elements of the conjunctions expressing the relation of
referent and object.
In English, the following example can be given.
This book that pen
These books those pens
However, it seems that there is also a feature of
management communication in the formation of such
compounds.
Here, first of all, it should be said that it is difficult to
determine which word is dominant and which word is
subordinate in the relationship between subject and
subject. The word in the function of the subject is the
ruler, so it matches its form with the word in the
function of the referent.
Depending on the person and date of the
demonstrative pronoun, the subject word takes the
possessive affix of that person and date. If we say that
the word in the function of the demonstrative is the
ruler, it takes the suffix of the demonstrative
agreement with the requirement of the word in the
function of the subject. In our opinion, there is both
subordination and governance in relation to each
other. Accordingly, it is possible to evaluate the
relationship between the supervisor and the subject as
a special form of subordinate communication, and it
can be called adaptive control in contrast to other
types of subordinate communication.
Due
to
this
connection,
referential-belonging
meanings are expressed.
Volume 03 Issue 10-2023
48
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
(ISSN
–
2771-2834)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
10
Pages:
44-51
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
997
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
The first element means directivity, and the second
element means affiliation.
Engagement relationship. In this connection, two
words are connected without any formal indicators. In
this case, the relationship of the subordinate word to
the dominant word is known from the order and
intonation.
Although the dominant word changes its form in the
agreement, the subordinate word does not change its
form. This subject is determined by the lexical-
grammatical feature of the word. In the function of a
subordinate word, mainly adjectives and adverbs,
other words of character can appear in the functions of
a subordinate word. Good life (adjective+noun), work
slowly (arrival+verb). Such a game (adjective
pronoun+noun), golden watch (adjective noun+noun),
singing girl (adjective+noun), saying goodbye
(adjective+verb) and others.
We can give the following examples in English
(Adjoining). Beautiful flower, gold ring, silver spoon,
wall clock, homework, horse bag, bread factory, etc.
components that express the relationship of
belonging, have entered into a relationship of mutual
agreement. Because they are related to each other not
through formal grammatical means, but through
order.
The governing word in the agreement is a noun and a
verb. When the governing word is a noun, the
attributive relation is expressed. Like a blue field, a
green village, clear water. When the governing word is
a verb, it expresses the case relation. Like walking fast,
working hard, talking too much.
In some words, adverbs do not fulfill their grammatical
function. For example, the conjugation forms in such
compounds as to come soon, to tell the truth, to tell a
lie, to return soon do not indicate a control
relationship. As they were added to these words, these
words were transferred to the ravish group as a whole.
So, these can also be considered graduation relations.
REFERENCES
1.
OXUNJONOVICH, Q. Z. (2022). CHANGES OF
LYULI IDENTITY. International Journal of
Philosophical Studies and Social Sciences, 2(3),
74-83.
2.
Okhunjonovich,
K.
Z.
(2023).
THE
EDUCATIONAL
VALUE
OF
NATIONAL
CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS IN THE ERA OF
GLOBALIZATION.
American
Journal
of
Interdisciplinary Research and Development,
18, 64-66.
3.
Okhunjonovich, K. Z. (2021). Self-Awareness of
Gypsies:
Traditionality
and
Modernity.
American Journal of Social and Humanitarian
Research, 2(7), 33-42.
4.
Корёгдиев, З. О. (2016). ACTIVITIES OF
AMUDARYA FLOTILLA AT THE END OF THE
NINETEENTH CENTURY-BEGINNING OF THE
TWENTIETH CENTURY HISTORY (" TURKESTAN
COLLECTION" MATERIALS). Ученый XXI века,
(12 (25)), 20-22.
5.
Корёгдиев, З. О. (2016). GOLD EMBROIDERY
O
F BUKHARA. Ученый XXI века, (12).
6.
Zayniddinovna, T. N. (2021). The Image of the
Eastern Ruler in the Works of Christopher
Marlowe. Central Asian Journal Of Social
Sciences And History, 2(10), 10-14.
7.
Zayniddinovna, T. N. (2022). The Problem of “A
Stro
ng Personality” in Shakespeare’Dramas:
Richard III and Macbeth. Middle European
Scientific Bulletin, 20, 7-10.
Volume 03 Issue 10-2023
49
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
(ISSN
–
2771-2834)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
10
Pages:
44-51
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
997
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
8.
Zaynitdinovna, T. N. (2022). Lyrical Dialogue in
Shakespeare's Poems as a Reflection of
Renaissance Anthropocentrism and a Strong
Personality.
Middle
European
Scientific
Bulletin, 21, 120-125.
9.
Ташева, Н. З. (2022). КРИСТОФЕР МАРЛОУ
(ЛИТЕРАТУРНЫЙ
АНАЛИЗ):
ТАМЕРЛЕН
ВЕЛИКИЙ
КАК
ТИП
ЛИЧНОСТИ
ВОСТОЧНОГО ПРАВИТЕЛЯ. Eurasian Journal
of Academic Research, 2(2), 234-239.
10.
Zayniddinovna, T. N. (2022). THE CHARACTER
OF STRONG PERSONALITY ACCORDINGLY
WITH EASTERN THEMATICS IN CHRISTOPHER
MARLOWE’S PLAY" TAMBURLAINE THE
GREAT". International Journal Of Literature
And Languages, 2(08), 9-14.
11.
Zayniddinovna,
T.
N.
(2022).
STRONG
PERSONALITY’S
ARTISTIC
AND
POETIC
REFLECTION IN THE RENAISSANCE EPOCH.
International Journal Of Literature And
Languages, 2(11), 43-51.
12.
nafisa Zayniddinovna, T. (2022). Lexico-
Semantic Word Production as a Way of
Forming Theater Terminology of the English
Language. American Journal of Social and
Humanitarian Research, 3(10), 144-150.
13.
Zayniddinovn, T. N., & Sharofiddinovich, S. S.
(2021). General cultural and educational values
of ancient-classic latin language. Central Asian
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science,
2(5), 77-80.
14.
Zayniddinovna,
T.
N.
(2023).
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE IMAGE OF AMIR
TEMUR
IN
CHRISTOPHER
MARLOWE'S
DRAMA"
TAMERLANE
THE
GREAT".
International Journal Of Literature And
Languages, 3(02), 36-43.
15.
Zayniddinovna,
T.
N.
(2023).
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE IMAGE OF AMIR
TEMUR
IN
CHRISTOPHER
MARLOWE'S
DRAMA"
TAMERLANE
THE
GREAT".
International Journal Of Literature And
Languages, 3(02), 36-43.
16.
Tasheva, N. (2023). EXPRESSION OF LEXICAL-
SEMANTIC
AND
SOCIO-SPIRITUAL
PARAMETERS IN THE CREATION OF GREAT
HUMAN FIGURES IN ENGLISH RENAISSANCE
DRAMA. Академические исследования в
современной науке, 2(21), 50
-57.
17.
Tasheva, N. (2023). LINGUISTIC AND STYLISTIC
FEATURES OF THE TRAGEDY" TAMERLANEE
THE GREAT". Общественные науки в
современном
мире:
теоретические
и
практические исследования, 2(8), 11
-14.
18.
Tasheva, N. (2023). " TAMERLANE THE GREAT"
AS A PHENOMENON OF THE WORLDVIEW OF
RENAISSANCE HUMANISM. Педагогика и
психология
в
современном
мире:
теоретические
и
практические
исследования, 2(9), 24
-27.
19.
Tasheva, N. (2023). EXPLORING THE RICH
TAPESTRY
OF
LINGUISTICS:
A
COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW. Science and
innovation in the education system, 2(11), 51-57.
20.
Tasheva, N. (2023). SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF
LEXEMES WITHIN THE CONCEPT OF THE IDEA
OF THE GREAT MAN IN MARLOWE'S DRAMA"
TAMERLANE THE GREAT". Инновационные
исследования в современном мире: теория и
практика, 2(18), 90
-93.
21.
Tasheva, N. (2023). EXPRESSION OF LEXICAL-
SEMANTIC
AND
SOCIO-EDUCATIONAL
PARAMETERS IN THE CREATION OF A GREAT
HUMAN FIGURE IN ENGLISH RENAISSANCE
Volume 03 Issue 10-2023
50
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
(ISSN
–
2771-2834)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
10
Pages:
44-51
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
997
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
DRAMA: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS.
Solution of social problems in management
and economy, 2(7), 11-14.
22.
Tasheva,
N.
(2023).
THE
ROLE
OF
CHRISTOPHER
MARLOWE
IN
THE
DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL ENGLISH
DURING THE RENAISSANCE. Models and
methods in modern science, 2(7), 14-19.
23.
Tasheva, N. (2023). THE IMAGE OF THE EAST IN
THE PLAY" TAMERLANE THE GREAT" BY K.
MARLOWE. International Bulletin of Applied
Science and Technology, 3(3), 113-120.
24.
Tasheva, N. (2023). THE GREAT TAMBURLEN
AS THE PSYCHOTYPE OF THE EASTERN RULER
IN THE POETRY OF CHRISTOPHER MARLOW.
Академические
исследования
в
современной науке, 2(4), 52
-58.
25.
Tasheva, N. (2022). INDIVIDUALISM OF THE
PHENOMENON OF A STRONG PERSONALITY
IN THE
AGE OF THE RENAISSANCE.
Евразийский
журнал
академических
исследований, 2(13), 454
-462.
26.
Джалилова, З. (2023). The notion of illocution
in the theory of speech acts by John Austin.
Современные тенденции при обучении
иностранному языку в XXI веке, 1(1).
27.
Djalilova,
Z.
(2023).
PEDAGOGICAL
EDUCATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY:
ESSENCE,
CHARACTERISTICS
AND
EFFICIENCY.
Академические
исследования
в
современной науке, 2(23), 29
-38.
28.
Djalilova, Z. (2023). THE SIGNIFICANCE AND
POSITION OF TEACHING METHODS IN
PROFESSIONAL TRAINING. Solution of social
problems in management and economy, 2(10),
31-42.
29.
Djalilova, Z. (2023). THE USE OF LATIN
TERMINOLOGY
IN
MEDICAL
CASE.
Академические
исследования
в
современной науке, 2(14), 9
-15.
30.
Djalilova, Z. (2022). GENDER-DETERMINED
DIFFERENCES IN THE SPEECH OF LITERARY
CHARACTERS. Eurasian Journal of Academic
Research, 2(12), 210-215.
31.
Djalilova, Z. (2022). GENDER ELEMENT OF
SPEECH BEHAVIOR FROM THE POSITION OF
TEXT ORGANIZATION MECHANISMS. Eurasian
Journal of Academic Research, 2(13), 274-281.
32.
Джалилова, З. (2022). ПРАГМАТИЧЕСКИЙ
ВЗГЛЯД НА МЕЖЛИЧНОСТНОЕ ОБЩЕНИЕ
.
Zamonaviy dunyoda ilm-fan va texnologiya,
1(7), 331-336.
33.
Djalilova,
Z.
(2022).
GENDER
XUSHMUOMALALIKKA
ASOSLANGAN
IBORALARNING SHAKLLANISHI. Zamonaviy
dunyoda innovatsion tadqiqotlar: Nazariya va
amaliyot, 1(28), 303-308.
34.
DZHALILOVA, Z. O., & SHARIPOV, A. G.
ALPHABET OF LATIN LANGUAGE. МОЛОДОЙ
УЧЕНЫЙ Учредители: ООО" Издательство
Молодой ученый", (52), 338
-339.
35.
DZHALILOVA, Z. O., & UBAJDULLOEV, A. U. U.
COMPARISON DEGREES OF ADJECTIVES IN
LATIN LANGUAGE. МОЛОДОЙ УЧЕНЫЙ
Учредители: ООО" Издательство Молодой
ученый", (52), 336
-338.
36.
DZHALILOVA, Z. O., & JAKUBOV, U. S.
NUMBERS IN LATIN LANGUAGE. МОЛОДОЙ
УЧЕНЫЙ Учредители: ООО" Издательство
Молодой ученый", (52), 339
-341.
37.
DZHALILOVA, Z. O., & ALIEV, M. N. ADJECTIVE
IN LATIN LANGUAGE. МОЛОДОЙ
УЧЕНЫЙ
Volume 03 Issue 10-2023
51
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
(ISSN
–
2771-2834)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
10
Pages:
44-51
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
997
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Учредители: ООО" Издательство Молодой
ученый", (52), 332
-334.
38.
DZHALILOVA, Z. O., & ALIEV, M. N. PRONOUNS
IN LATIN LANGUAGE. МОЛОДОЙ УЧЕНЫЙ
Учредители: ООО" Издательство Молодой
ученый", (52), 334
-336.
39.
DJALILOVA, Z. O., & KHAYOTOV, K. M. K. U.
LATIN PRONOUNS. МОЛОДОЙ УЧЕНЫЙ
Учредители: ООО" Издательство Молодой
ученый", (53), 257
-258.
40.
DJALILOVA, Z. O., & KHAYOTOV, M. K. U.
VERBS IN LATIN LANGUAGE. МОЛОДОЙ
УЧЕНЫЙ Учредители: ООО" Издательство
Молодой ученый", (53), 255
-257.
41.
Djalilova, Z. O. (2023). A DISCOURSIVE TURN IN
THE THEORY OF LINGUISTIC POLITENESS: TO
THE FORMATION OF THE THEORY OF
LINGUISTIC
IMPOLITENESS.
International
Journal Of Literature And Languages, 3(02), 15-
23.
