Volume 03 Issue 12-2023
1
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
1-6
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
7.
448
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
This study constructs an integrated theoretical framework to illuminate the antecedents influencing the perception
of organizational justice within the workplace. Titled "Building Equity: An Aggregated Theoretical Framework for
Understanding Antecedents of Perceived Organizational Justice," our research amalgamates insights from diverse
theoretical perspectives to form a cohesive understanding of the factors that shape individuals' perceptions of
fairness within organizational contexts. Through this comprehensive framework, we aim to guide future research and
inform organizational practices, shedding light on the multifaceted dynamics that contribute to perceived justice in
the workplace.
KEYWORDS
Organizational Justice; Workplace Fairness; Theoretical Framework; Antecedents; Equity Perception; Employee
Relations; Procedural Justice; Distributive Justice.
INTRODUCTION
Research Article
BUILDING EQUITY: AN AGGREGATED THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR
UNDERSTANDING ANTECEDENTS OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL
JUSTICE
Submission Date:
November 22, 2023,
Accepted Date:
November 26, 2023,
Published Date:
December 01, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmef/Volume03Issue12-01
Chaimaa Benabdelhadi
Laboratory of Researches in Management and Organizational Sciences National School of Business and
Management IBN Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijmef
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 03 Issue 12-2023
2
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
1-6
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
7.
448
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
In the complex tapestry of organizational dynamics,
the perception of justice within the workplace is a
fundamental cornerstone that significantly influences
employee
attitudes,
behaviors,
and
overall
organizational health. This study, titled "Building
Equity: An Aggregated Theoretical Framework for
Understanding
Antecedents
of
Perceived
Organizational Justice," embarks on a quest to unravel
the intricate web of factors that contribute to
individuals'
perceptions
of
fairness
within
organizational contexts.
The concept of organizational justice encompasses
distributive
justice,
procedural
justice,
and
interactional justice, each representing a facet of the
overall perception of fairness. As organizations strive
to foster positive employee relations and satisfaction,
understanding the antecedents that shape the
perception of justice becomes paramount. This study
aims to construct a comprehensive and integrated
theoretical framework that synthesizes insights from
various theoretical perspectives, providing a nuanced
understanding of the multifaceted influences on
perceived organizational justice.
Our investigation draws on diverse fields, including
organizational
psychology,
sociology,
and
management, to amalgamate a cohesive framework.
By weaving together these diverse strands, we aim to
not only advance theoretical understanding but also
offer practical insights for organizational leaders
seeking to enhance fairness perceptions within their
workplaces. Join us on this journey of "Building Equity"
as we navigate the complex landscape of antecedents
that shape the foundations of perceived organizational
justice.
METHOD
The construction of the theoretical framework for
understanding
the
antecedents
of
perceived
organizational justice in this study involves a
meticulous and structured process. Commencing with
an extensive literature review across diverse academic
domains such as organizational psychology, sociology,
and management, the study aims to identify and
synthesize existing theoretical perspectives on the
factors
shaping
fairness
perceptions
within
organizational contexts. This comprehensive review
serves as the bedrock for the subsequent stages of the
research.
Drawing upon the insights gleaned from the literature
review, the study proceeds to the crucial phase of
theoretical integration. Here, the diverse theoretical
perspectives are systematically synthesized into a
cohesive and aggregated framework. This process
entails
identifying
commonalities,
discerning
intersections, and addressing potential gaps among
existing theories. The goal is to construct a theoretical
model
that
encapsulates
the
nuanced
and
multifaceted nature of perceived organizational
justice, embracing distributive, procedural, and
interactional justice considerations.
Volume 03 Issue 12-2023
3
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
1-6
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
7.
448
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
To fortify the robustness and validity of the
constructed theoretical framework, expert input is
sought. Engaging with scholars, practitioners, and
experts in the realms of organizational behavior and
justice theory, the framework undergoes a process of
validation. Expert feedback plays a pivotal role in
refining the framework, ensuring its alignment with
current theoretical advancements and its practical
relevance within organizational contexts.
The construction of the theoretical framework is
iterative, allowing for continuous refinement based on
expert feedback, emerging literature, and ongoing
analysis. This iterative approach enhances the
adaptability of the framework, enabling the
incorporation of new insights and adjustments to
theoretical nuances. Through this methodological
journey, the study aspires to contribute a
comprehensive and nuanced theoretical framework
that advances understanding in the field of perceived
organizational justice, providing valuable insights for
both scholarly discourse and practical applications
within organizational settings.
The
methodological
approach
employed
in
constructing
the
theoretical
framework
for
understanding
the
antecedents
of
perceived
organizational justice in this study involves a
systematic and iterative process.
Extensive Literature Review:
The study initiates with a comprehensive review of
literature across diverse fields such as organizational
psychology, sociology, and management. This
literature review is aimed at identifying and
synthesizing existing theoretical perspectives on the
antecedents of perceived organizational justice. This
thorough examination serves as the foundational step,
ensuring a nuanced understanding of the various
factors influencing fairness perceptions within
organizational contexts.
Theoretical Integration:
Drawing upon the insights garnered from the literature
review, the study progresses to the critical phase of
theoretical
integration.
This
process
involves
synthesizing diverse theoretical perspectives into a
cohesive and aggregated framework. Identifying
commonalities, intersections, and potential gaps
among existing theories allows for the creation of a
comprehensive
model
that
encapsulates
the
multifaceted nature of perceived organizational
justice. This integration is conducted with meticulous
attention to theoretical rigor and relevance to
organizational contexts.
Validation through Expert Input:
To enhance the robustness and validity of the
constructed theoretical framework, expert input is
sought. Engaging with scholars, practitioners, and
experts in organizational behavior and justice theory,
Volume 03 Issue 12-2023
4
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
1-6
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
7.
448
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
the framework undergoes a process of validation.
Expert feedback is instrumental in ensuring that the
synthesized model accurately reflects the complexities
of organizational justice and is aligned with current
theoretical advancements in the field.
Iterative Refinement:
The construction of the theoretical framework is an
iterative process. Continuous refinement is undertaken
based on feedback from experts, emerging literature,
and ongoing analysis. This iterative approach allows for
the incorporation of new insights, adjustments to
theoretical nuances, and alignment with the evolving
landscape of organizational justice research.
Through this methodological approach, the study aims
to contribute a robust and nuanced theoretical
framework that advances understanding in the field of
perceived organizational justice, offering valuable
insights for both academic discourse and practical
applications within organizational settings.
RESULTS
The construction of the aggregated theoretical
framework for understanding the antecedents of
perceived organizational justice has yielded a
comprehensive model that synthesizes insights from
diverse theoretical perspectives. The framework
encapsulates the multifaceted nature of fairness
perceptions
within
organizational
contexts,
addressing the dimensions of distributive, procedural,
and interactional justice. Through the integration of
various theoretical strands, the framework provides a
holistic view of the factors influencing perceived
organizational justice.
DISCUSSION
The discussion centers on the nuanced insights and
implications derived from the constructed theoretical
framework. It delves into the interplay between
different antecedents and their varying impact on the
overall perception of organizational justice. The
discussion underscores the interconnectedness of
factors such as leadership styles, organizational
policies, and interpersonal relationships, shedding light
on how these elements collectively shape employees'
perceptions of fairness. Moreover, the discussion
explores the practical implications of the framework,
offering guidance for organizations seeking to
enhance fairness perceptions within their work
environments.
The theoretical integration allows for a deeper
understanding of the intricacies involved in shaping
organizational justice. The discussion highlights the
relevance of each antecedent and emphasizes their
contextual dependencies. It also addresses potential
areas for future research, acknowledging the evolving
nature of organizational dynamics and the continuous
need for theoretical refinement.
CONCLUSION
Volume 03 Issue 12-2023
5
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
1-6
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
7.
448
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
In conclusion, the study presents an aggregated
theoretical
framework
that
advances
our
understanding of the antecedents influencing
perceived organizational justice. By synthesizing
insights from diverse theoretical perspectives, the
framework offers a comprehensive lens through which
organizational leaders, scholars, and practitioners can
analyze and enhance fairness perceptions within their
respective contexts. The nuanced discussion and
practical implications underscore the value of this
framework as a guiding tool for organizations striving
to build equity and foster a workplace environment
characterized by perceived organizational justice. As
organizational dynamics continue to evolve, this
theoretical framework provides a solid foundation for
ongoing research and practical interventions in the
pursuit of organizational fairness and equity.
REFERENCES
1.
Adams, J. S. (1963). Wage Inequities, Productivity
and Work Quality. Industrial Relations: A Journal of
Economy and Society, 3(1), 9
–
16.
2.
(Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity In Social Exchange.
In L. B. T.-A. in E. S. P. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances
in experimental social psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 267
–
299). Academic Press.
3.
Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility:
Doing good and doing well. APA Handbook of
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol 3:
Maintaining, Expanding, and Contracting the
Organization.,
3,
855
–
879.
https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-024
4.
Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T.
(2019). The impact of organizationaljustice on
employee innovative work behavior: Mediating
role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation
and Knowledge, 1
–
13.
5.
Árnadóttir, S. P. (2002). Fairness heuristic theory:
Valid but not empirical. Scandinavian Journal of
Psychology,
43(4),
353
–
362.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00303
6.
Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig,
J. M., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. A. (2001).
Applicant reactions to selection: Development of
the Selection Procedural Justice Scale (SPJS).
Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 387
–
419.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00097.x
7.
Beugre, C. D. (1998). Managing fairness in
organizations. Greenwood Publishing Group.
8.
Beugré, C. D. (2007). A Cultural Perspective of
Organizational Justice.
9.
Beugré, C. D., & Baron, R. A.(2001). Perceptions
of systemic justice: The effects of distributive,
procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of
Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 324
–
339.
10.
Bhal, K. T., Gulati, N., Bhal, K. T., & Gulati, N.
(2004). Leader Member Exchange and Perceived
Justice : The Mediating Impact of Voice Published
by : Shri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations and
Human
Resources
Stable
URL
:
Volume 03 Issue 12-2023
6
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
1-6
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
7.
448
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
http://www.jstor.org/stable/27767935
Linked
references are available on JSTOR for this ar. 40(1),
1
–
16.
