Authors

  • Saidorifkhon Mukhtarov
    Andijan State Medical Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijms.79531

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is one of the most severe and prognostically unfavorable complications of cardiovascular diseases. Over the past 30 years, the average life expectancy of patients with this diagnosis has increased from 3.5 to 8 years. This module contains information on modern CHF treatment options that a cardiologist should have at all stages of medical care: from outpatient care to a heart failure specialist.

 

 

background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Ap

ri

l,

20

25

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

TREATMENT OF CHRONIC HEART FAILURE

Mukhtarov Saidorifkhon Abdukodirkhuja ugli

Assistant of the Department of Therapy, Faculty

Andijan State Medical Institute

Abstract.

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is one of the most severe and prognostically

unfavorable complications of cardiovascular diseases. Over the past 30 years, the average

life expectancy of patients with this diagnosis has increased from 3.5 to 8 years. This

module contains information on modern CHF treatment options that a cardiologist should

have at all stages of medical care: from outpatient care to a heart failure specialist.

Kеywоrds:

chronic heart failure, treatment, high-tech treatment methods.

INTRОDUСTIОN

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a disease with a complex of characteristic symptoms

(shortness of breath, fatigue and decreased physical activity, edema, etc.), which are

associated with inadequate perfusion of organs and tissues at rest or under stress and often

with fluid retention in the div. The underlying cause is a deterioration in the heart's ability

to fill or empty, caused by myocardial damage, as well as an imbalance of vasoconstrictor

and vasodilating neurohumoral systems [1].

MАTЕRIАLS АND MЕTHОDS

Ischemic heart disease is the main cause of heart failure in 2/3 of all cases [2]. This poses the

problem of choosing approaches to myocardial revascularization in CHF for the clinician.

Isolated left ventricular plastic surgery in patients with CHF of ischemic etiology with low

left ventricular EF, despite a decrease in cardiac volume, did not affect the prognosis and

cannot be considered recommended (class III, level of evidence B). The decision on the

advisability of aneurysmectomy is made jointly by the surgeon and cardiologist; such

intervention is justified in the case of large saccular aneurysms of the LV. The relevance of

the problem of surgical treatment of post-infarction aneurysms is due to the low survival rate

of patients: only 30-50% survive for 5 years, according to various authors (development of

heart failure, thromboembolic complications, life-threatening rhythm disturbances in more

than half of patients). Remodeling of the LV in post-infarction aneurysm is the appearance

of akinesia zones, a decrease in stroke volume, an increase in the size and volume of the left

ventricle, a compensatory increase in heart rate, and the occurrence of "ischemic mitral

insufficiency".

RЕSULTS АND DISСUSSIОN

One of the main problems in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction is aortic valve

stenosis with a low gradient (EF <40%, aortic valve orifice area <1 cm2, mean gradient <40

mmHg). In some patients this is a true severe stenosis, and in some it is a “pseudo-aortic

stenosis”, when the reduced blood flow through the aortic valve is caused not by leaflet


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Ap

ri

l,

20

25

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

obstruction, but by a low stroke volume. If the mean gradient is >40 mmHg, then there are

no theoretical limitations for valve replacement in symptomatic patients. In patients with

contraindications to open surgery (for example, due to severe lung pathology), it is possible

to use transcatheter techniques for aortic valve replacement TAVI (Transcatheter aortic

valve implantation) [3].

Aortic valve repair or replacement is recommended for all symptomatic and asymptomatic

patients with severe aortic regurgitation and EF <50%, unless there are contraindications to

surgery. Surgery may also be appropriate in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and LV

end-diastolic diameter >70 mm or end-systolic diameter >50 mm (or >25 mm/m2 of patient

div area) [4].

Evaluation of mitral regurgitation should be comprehensive, especially in patients with LV

systolic dysfunction (in mitral regurgitation there are certain difficulties in assessing systolic

function).

Differential diagnosis between primary and secondary mitral regurgitation is complex. The

decision to perform surgery should be based on the severity of clinical symptoms, patient

age, atrial fibrillation, degree of left ventricular systolic function impairment, pulmonary

hypertension, and the possibility of valve replacement. The latter is the most important

predictor in the postoperative period. Relative (non-valvular) mitral regurgitation occurs due

to dilation and change in the shape of the left ventricle and the mitral valve annulus, which

leads to incomplete closure of its leaflets. Full-scale drug therapy and, in some cases,

resynchronization therapy can lead to reverse left ventricular remodeling and a decrease in

functional mitral regurgitation. depending on the area of ​ ​ mitral regurgitation.

Ischemic mitral regurgitation is a special type of secondary mitral regurgitation that is most

suitable for surgical intervention [2]. Combined surgical intervention – CABG + mitral

valve replacement – ​ ​ can be considered appropriate in symptomatic patients with left

ventricular dysfunction, coronary artery disease with a sufficient amount of viable

myocardium. Predictors of late complications after mitral valve reconstruction are a large

distance between the papillary muscles, rigidity of the posterior mitral valve leaflet and a

marked increase in the left ventricle (end-diastolic diameter >65 mm). In such patients,

mitral valve replacement is preferable to plastic surgery. In atrial fibrillation, atrial

arrhythmogenic ablation procedures and left atrial appendage closure may be appropriate

during mitral valve surgery.

Heart transplantation is a generally accepted treatment for end-stage CHF [3]. Although

controlled studies have never been conducted, it is believed that HT, provided that patient

selection criteria are met, significantly increases patient survival, increases exercise

tolerance, improves quality of life, and enables a faster return to work compared with

traditional treatment.

СОNСLUSIОN

In addition to the shortage of donor hearts, the main problems with HT are the consequences

of the limited effectiveness of the method and complications from immunosuppressive

therapy in the late period (for example, antigen-antidiv-mediated graft rejection, infectious


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Ap

ri

l,

20

25

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

complications, hypertension, renal failure, malignancy and vasculopathy of the coronary

arteries).

RЕFЕRЕNСЕS

1. Cleland J.G., Freemantle N., Erdmann E. et al. Long-term mortality with cardiac

resynchronization therapy in the Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) trial

// Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2012. Vol. 14. P. 628–634.

2. Hunt S.A., Baker D.W., Chin M.H. et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and

management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of

Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to

Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure // J. Am.

Coll. Cardiol. 2001. Vol. 88. P. 2101–2113.

3. Chin M.H., Goldman L. Factors contributing to the hospitalization of patients with

congestive heart failure // Am. J. Public Health. 1997. Vol. 87. P. 643–648.

4. Velazquez E.J., Lee K.L., Deja M.A. et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients

with left ventricular dysfunction // N. Engl. J. Med. 2011. Vol. 364. P. 1607–1616.

References

Cleland J.G., Freemantle N., Erdmann E. et al. Long-term mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) trial // Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2012. Vol. 14. P. 628–634.

Hunt S.A., Baker D.W., Chin M.H. et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001. Vol. 88. P. 2101–2113.

Chin M.H., Goldman L. Factors contributing to the hospitalization of patients with congestive heart failure // Am. J. Public Health. 1997. Vol. 87. P. 643–648.

Velazquez E.J., Lee K.L., Deja M.A. et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction // N. Engl. J. Med. 2011. Vol. 364. P. 1607–1616.