Authors

  • U. Musashaykhov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijms.96637

Abstract

During the study, in 107 patients with vascular thrombosis of various localization, the associative relationship of Leu33Pro in the integrin beta-3 (ITGB3) gene in the formation of pathology data was analyzed. In the studied groups, the actual distribution of C807T polymorphism genotypes corresponded to those expected at the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p<0.05).

 

 

background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

MOLECULAR-GENETIC FEATURES OF VASCULAR THROMBOSIS

Musashaykhov U. Kh.

Andijan State Medical Institute.

Annotation.

During the study, in 107 patients with vascular thrombosis of various

localization, the associative relationship of Leu33Pro in the integrin beta-3 (ITGB3) gene in

the formation of pathology data was analyzed. In the studied groups, the actual distribution

of C807T polymorphism genotypes corresponded to those expected at the Hardy-Weinberg

equilibrium (p<0.05).

Key words:

ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis of the lower

extremities, genetic polymorphism Leu33Pro ITGB3.

Relevance.

In recent years, there has been an increase in the proportion of vascular

thrombosis of various localizations among young people [4]. The incidence, according to

various sources, varies from 3 to 23 per 100,000 people [2]. Hereditary thrombophilia can

most often be considered as a provocateur in these situations, since some patients have

occlusion of the cerebral and coronary arteries due to intravascular thrombosis during

examination [1, 6]. Thrombophilia is defined as a violation of hemostasis and hemorheology,

characterized by an increased tendency to develop thrombosis or intravascular coagulation,

which is based on acquired and genetically modified blood clots. conditioned disorders in

various parts of hemostasis and hemorheology [3]. Among the factors that increase the risk

of thrombosis, platelet receptor genes are very important. In this case, a genetic marker of

the platelet receptor gene for collagen (ITGA2 807C>T) and fibrinogen (ITGB31565T>C) is

analyzed. With a defect in the collagen receptor gene, platelet adhesion to the vascular

endothelium and to each other increases, which leads to increased thrombosis. When

analyzing the genetic marker ITGB31565T>C, it is possible to identify the effectiveness or

ineffectiveness of antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. Disorders caused by mutations in these

genes increase the risk of thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke [5].

Material and methods of research.

During the genetic study, we examined 107 patients

with vascular thrombosis of various localizations who were in the neurological,

cardiological and surgical departments of the clinic of the Andijan State Medical Institute

and the Andijan branch of the Republican Scientific Center for Emergency Medical Care,

who formed the main group. Among them, patients with DVT n=35, with IS n=35, with MI

n=37. The control group consisted of 103 conditionally "healthy" individuals without

thromboembolic diseases (TES) at the moment and in the anamnesis. Diagnosis of these

diseases was carried out in accordance with currently accepted clinical recommendations.

Isolation of a DNA molecule from peripheral blood was performed using the Ampli Prime

RIBO_prep kit.

Genotyping of the Leu33Pro ITGB3 polymorphism was performed using

the Tag Man probe method on a Rotor-Gene Q amplifier (Quagen, Germany), using a

commercial test kit of Litech LLC (Russia).

Statistical processing of the results was performed using the standard OpenEpi V.9. 2

application software package. The deviation of the empirical genotype frequencies from the

theoretically expected Hardy–Weinberg distribution was analyzed using the Statistica 6.0


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

software package. The frequencies of both alleles and Leu33Pro genotypes in the integrin

beta-3 (ITGB33

)

gene are presented as absolute values. numbers and

percentages. Accordingly, differences between groups were evaluated using the χ

2 criterion

.

Moreover, to quantify the effect of each variant on disease risk, univariate odds ratios (OR)

were calculated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

The aim

of the study is

to study the frequency of distribution and evaluate the relationship

of the Leu33Pro polymorphism in the integrin beta-3 (ITGB3)

gene in patients with vascular

thrombosis of various localizations.

Results obtained and their discussion

In the study, the proportion of Leu and Pro alleles in patients with vascular thrombosis of

various locations and in the control group Leu и Prowas 91.1% and 8.9% versus 95.6% and

4.4%, respectively. Statistical processing revealed a slight decrease in the frequency of the

wild Leu allele (χ

2

=3.4; P=0.06; OR=0.5; 95%CI:0.21-1.06) and a tendency to increase the

mutant Pro allele was found in patients with vascular thrombosis of various localizations

compared to conditionally healthy donors. The calculated coefficient of the odds ratio

showed that the chance of detecting a functional unfavorable Pro allele in the respondents of

the main group increased 2.1 times compared to the representatives of the control group

2

=3.4; P=0.06; OR=2.1; 95%CI:0.94-4.83).

As can be seen (Table 1), the frequency of the unfavorable Pro/Pro genotype among patients

with vascular thrombosis of various localizations was slightly higherthan in the control

group (0.9% vs. 0.0%, respectively, with χ

2

=1.0; P=0.3).

Table-1.

Association between the Leu33Pro polymorphism in the integrin beta-3 (ITGB3) gene

in patient and control groups

Study groups

Alleles

and

genotypes

Statistical difference in relation to the control group
Odds ratio

χ2

p-value

OR

95% CI:

Main group

(n=107)

Leu

0.5

0.21 – 1.06

3.4

0.06

Pro

2.1

0.94 – 4.83

Leu/Leu

0.5

0.20 – 1.11

3.1

0.08

Leu/Pro

2.0

0.85 – 4.71

2.6

0.1

Pro/Pro

***

***

1.0

0.3

Also, the wild Leu/Leu genotype of the study group was found to be slightly lower

compared to the control group (χ

2

=3.1; P=0.08; OR=0.5; 95%CI:0.20–1.11). This means that

there is no association of these genotypes (Leu/Leu, Pro/Pro) with respect to the formation


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

of vascular thrombosis of various localizations, such as DVT, AI, MI. However, there is a

tendency to increase the proportion of carriers of the unfavorable Leu/Pro genotype among

patients compared to the control group (15.9% vs. 8.7%, respectively).. 1). According to the

odds ratio, the risk of developing vascular thrombosis of various localizations in the

presence of this genotype increases 2.0 times (χ

2

=2.6; P=0.1; OR=2.0; 95%CI:0.85-4.71).

(Table 1).

Conclusion.

Thus, the analyzed data of the study showed that, in patients with DVTNA, IS,

and MI, the detection of the minor Pro allele and the associated unfavorable Leu/Pro

genotype was associated with a low risk of developing and relapsing thrombogenic

complications as a result of a moderate increase in platelet aggregation ability. Also, if the

Pro /Pro mutant genotype was detectedPro in the main group, there was no risk of

developing these pathologies.

List of literature.

1.

Kapustin S. I., Shmeleva V. M., Sidorova Zh. Y. and others. Molecular determinants

of hereditary thrombophilia: current state and prospects of gene diagnostics (literature

review). Bulletin of Hematology. 2011;VII(4):84–90.

2.

Chiasakul T, De Jesus E, Tong J, Chen Y, Crowther M, Garcia D, Chai-Adisaksopha

C, Messé SR, Cuker A. Inherited Thrombophilia and the Risk of Arterial Ischemic Stroke: A

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e012877.

3.

Dautaj A, Krasi G, Bushati V, Precone V, Gheza M, Fioretti F, Sartori M, Costantini

A, Benedetti S, Bertelli M. Hereditary thrombophilia. Acta Biomed. 2019 Sep 30;90(10-

S):44-46. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i10-S.8758.

4. Hathidara MY, Saini V, Malik AM. Stroke in the Young: a Global Update. Curr Neurol

Neurosci Rep. 2019 Nov 25;19(11):91.

5. Liu H, Wang Y, Zheng J, Li G, Chen T, Lei J, Mao Y, Wang J, Liu W, Zhao G, Tacey M,

Yan B. Platelet glycoprotein gene Ia C807T, HPA-3, and Ibα VNTR polymorphisms are

associated with increased ischemic stroke risk: Evidence from a comprehensive meta-

analysis. Int J Stroke. 2017 Jan;12(1):46-70.

6. Salehi Omran S, Hartman A, Zakai NA, Navi BB. Thrombophilia Testing After Ischemic

Stroke: Why, When, and What? Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1874-1884. doi:

10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032360. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

References

Kapustin S. I., Shmeleva V. M., Sidorova Zh. Y. and others. Molecular determinants of hereditary thrombophilia: current state and prospects of gene diagnostics (literature review). Bulletin of Hematology. 2011;VII(4):84–90.

Chiasakul T, De Jesus E, Tong J, Chen Y, Crowther M, Garcia D, Chai-Adisaksopha C, Messé SR, Cuker A. Inherited Thrombophilia and the Risk of Arterial Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e012877.

Dautaj A, Krasi G, Bushati V, Precone V, Gheza M, Fioretti F, Sartori M, Costantini A, Benedetti S, Bertelli M. Hereditary thrombophilia. Acta Biomed. 2019 Sep 30;90(10-S):44-46. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i10-S.8758.

Hathidara MY, Saini V, Malik AM. Stroke in the Young: a Global Update. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019 Nov 25;19(11):91.

Liu H, Wang Y, Zheng J, Li G, Chen T, Lei J, Mao Y, Wang J, Liu W, Zhao G, Tacey M, Yan B. Platelet glycoprotein gene Ia C807T, HPA-3, and Ibα VNTR polymorphisms are associated with increased ischemic stroke risk: Evidence from a comprehensive meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2017 Jan;12(1):46-70.

Salehi Omran S, Hartman A, Zakai NA, Navi BB. Thrombophilia Testing After Ischemic Stroke: Why, When, and What? Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1874-1884. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032360. Epub 2021 Apr 20.