Authors

  • Dilbar Rakhmatova
    Bukhara State Medical Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijms.96678

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with or without ST-elevation is a diagnosis established at the stage of initial contact with the patient based on the clinical picture, electrocardiogram (ECG) data and the level of markers of myocardial necrosis.  and is usually accompanied by complete thrombotic occlusion of the coronary artery requiring emergency care, including thrombolytic therapy. ACS without ST elevation may be accompanied by unstable angina and also requires observation and treatment, especially in patients with atypical symptoms characteristic of the elderly, women, and those with chronic diseases.

 

 

background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

ADVANCES IN EARLY DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND TREATMENT

PLANNING FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME

Rakhmatova Dilbar Bakhriddinovna

Bukhara State Medical Institute Department of Internal Diseases in Family Medicine

dilbar_raxmatova09@bsmi.uz

orcid.org/0000-0002-7321-3248

Annotation.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with or without ST-elevation is a diagnosis

established at the stage of initial contact with the patient based on the clinical picture,

electrocardiogram (ECG) data and the level of markers of myocardial necrosis. and is

usually accompanied by complete thrombotic occlusion of the coronary artery requiring

emergency care, including thrombolytic therapy. ACS without ST elevation may be

accompanied by unstable angina and also requires observation and treatment, especially in

patients with atypical symptoms characteristic of the elderly, women, and those with chronic

diseases.

Key words:

Acute coronary syndrome, myocardial necrosis, unstable angina, thrombolytic

therapy, thrombotic occlusion, angina attack, atypical symptoms.

Introduction

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is one of the most pressing issues in modern cardiology, as

it is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. ACS presents in various

clinical forms, which complicates its diagnosis and treatment. In clinical practice, accurate

identification of ACS—particularly distinguishing between ST-segment elevation (STEMI)

and non-ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI)—is crucial for preventing severe complications.

Diagnostic and treatment methods for ACS are constantly evolving, given the highly

individualized nature of each patient’s condition. Therefore, comprehensive medical

evaluation—including electrocardiography (ECG), blood tests, and other diagnostic

procedures—is essential for accurately determining the type of ACS. This, in turn, ensures

the delivery of the most effective treatment.It is well established that ST-elevation ACS

(STEMI) and non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEMI) have different clinical presentations and

outcomes. Consequently, the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches must be tailored to the

specific features of each patient’s condition. The aim of this analysis is to review the various

forms of ACS and the key considerations necessary for their management.

Objective of the Study:

To conduct early diagnosis of ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEMI) in

order to restore coronary blood flow and reduce the risk of death.

Materials and Methods:

Clinical, laboratory, and instrumental studies were conducted on patients with acute

coronary syndrome at the Bukhara branch of the Republican Scientific Center for


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Emergency Medical Care. The study included patients who sought emergency medical

assistance or were admitted for hospitalization.

To prevent complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and sudden coronary death,

patients with clinical signs of AMI in the pre-hospital stage received thrombolytic therapy

during the first hours after diagnosis confirmation of ST-segment elevation ACS (based on

ECG data within 3–6 hours). This intervention aimed to restore coronary artery function by

resolving thrombotic obstruction.

Using the above methods, clinical indicators and treatment effectiveness rates were

compared between two groups of 60 patients each in Bukhara region:

One group received pre-hospital treatment (via reomobile or shock room);

The other group was treated in intensive care and cardio-therapeutic resuscitation

units of an emergency hospital.

Study Results

Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome were immediately hospitalized in the

intensive care unit by specialized cardiology emergency teams.

Table 1

NUMBER

OF

PATIENTS

WITH

ACUTE

CORONARY

SYNDROME

HOSPITALIZED AT THE BUKHARA BRANCH OF THE REPUBLICAN

SCIENTIFIC CENTER FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE

Control

group

(n=20)

Self-admitted,

by

personal

visit

25%

Admitted by emergency medical service (EMS) physicians

– 75%

Main

group

(n=60)

Self-admitted,

by

personal

visit

25%

Admitted by emergency medical service (EMS) physicians

– 75%

Legend:

Self-admitted

(by

personal

request)

By EMS physicians


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Group

By EMS Physicians Self-Admitted

Main Group (n=60)

45 patients

15 patients

Control Group (n=20)

15 patients

5 patients

Legend:

By EMS physicians

Self-admitted (upon personal request)

Sixty patients were admitted with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by

intensive care emergency teams to the shock unit of the Bukhara branch of the Republican

Scientific Center for Emergency Medical Care (RSCEMC). Additionally, 20 patients were

hospitalized on a self-admission basis after undergoing electrocardiography (ECG) and

interpretation of the results.

Emergency measures were focused on relieving pain syndrome, reducing myocardial

workload and oxygen demand, limiting the extent of necrosis in cases of myocardial

infarction, and treating as well as preventing complications such as cardiogenic shock and

life-threatening arrhythmias.

Group

Self-Admitted Admitted by EMS Physicians

Main group

~15 patients

~45 patients


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Group

Self-Admitted Admitted by EMS Physicians

Control group

~5 patients

~15 patients

Legend:

Self-admitted

By emergency medical service (EMS) physicians

Fig. 1. Number of patients with acute coronary syndrome hospitalized at the Bukhara

Branch of the Republican Scientific Center for Emergency Medical Care.

Table 2

Patient Visits by Nature of Chest Pain

Based on Table 2 and Figure 2, the patients' reasons for seeking medical attention—

specifically pain location, character, cause, and time of onset—indicate the urgency and


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

necessity of providing emergency care, including pre-hospital first aid. According to survey

data, 100% of respondents accurately described the

character of the pain

and the

time of

its onset

.

In terms of

pain location

, 55 patients (92%) reported radiating pain in the

chest area

,

under the scapula

, and

shoulder

, consistent with classic symptoms of acute coronary

syndrome. A small proportion of elderly patients—5 individuals (8%)—localized pain in the

epigastric region

, which they associated with gastrointestinal discomfort or eating. The

causes of pain

varied and included stress, physical exertion, general malaise, and heavy

lifting—reported by 50 patients (84%).These findings highlight the critical importance of

accurate pain assessment during the early, pre-hospital phase in guiding timely emergency

intervention.

Figure 3. Distribution of Chest Pain Characteristics Among Patients with ACS (Main

vs. Control Group)

Pain Parameter Main Group (%) Control Group (%)
Epigastric Pain

8%

15%

Pain Character

100%

100%

Pain Cause

84%

75%

Pain Onset Time

100%

70%

Legend:

Main group

Control group

Interpretation:

As shown in Fig. 3, both groups demonstrated full awareness (100%) of pain character and

onset time, which is crucial for early diagnosis and pre-hospital emergency care. However,

epigastric pain was more frequently misattributed by elderly patients in the control group.

The main group showed slightly higher recognition of pain causes (84%) compared to the

control group (75%).


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Fig. 2. Reasons for Seeking Medical Attention in Patients with Chest Pain

Table 3. Additional Complaints in Patients with Chest Pain

Previous myocardial infarction

Pain reduced after nitroglycerin use

Shock

Patient condition: coma


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

According to Table 3 and patient questionnaires,

15 patients (25%)

in the main group were

in a state of

shock

, compared to

2 patients (10%)

in the control group. The use of

nitroglycerin

did

not relieve chest pain

in patients from the main group, which supports

the accuracy of the initial diagnosis. In contrast,

3 patients (15%)

in the control group

experienced pain relief after nitroglycerin administration. A

history of myocardial

infarction

was identified based on interviews with relatives:

7 patients (12%)

in the main

group and

1 patient (5%)

in the control group had previously experienced a myocardial

infarction.

Previous Myocardial

Infarction

Pain

Reduced

After

Nitroglycerin

Shock

Figure 4. Clinical Status Indicators in ACS Patients (Main vs. Control Group)

Indicator

Main Group (%) Control Group (%)

Shock

25%

10%

Pain Reduced with Nitroglycerin

0%

15%

Previous Myocardial Infarction

12%

5%

Legend:

Main Group

Control Group

Figure 3. Additional Complaints in Patients with Chest Pain

Table 4. Heredity and Harmful Habits

N

o

.

Main group

Control group

n=60

%

n=20

%


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

1

Hereditary

diseases:

Arterial

hypertension

Diabetes mellitus

0

41

9

0

68

15

0

10

3

0

50

15

2

Bad habits: smoking, alcoholic drinks

0

21

22

35

37

0

9

13

45

65

3

Chronic diseases:

Fatty hepatosis

Chronic cholecystitis

Chronic gastritis

Hypertension

Diabetes mellitus

0

0

1

2

5

41

9

0

1.6

3.3

8.3

68

15

0

1

1

1

10

3

5

5

5

50

15

According to Table 4, hereditary factors played a significant role in 41 patients (68%),

primarily those suffering from hypertension. Additionally, 9 patients (15%) had diabetes

mellitus, while other comorbidities such as fatty liver disease (1.6%), chronic hepatitis

(3.3%), and chronic gastritis (8.3%) further worsened the overall condition of the patients.

Harmful habits were also found to be important contributing factors: 21 patients (35%) were

smokers, and 22 patients (37%) reported alcohol consumption.


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Condition

Main Group Control Group

Hypertension

68%

50%

Diabetes Mellitus

15%

~12%

Fatty Liver Disease 1.6%

~1%

Chronic Cholecystitis ~3%

~3%

Chronic Gastritis

8.3%

~7%

Legend:

Main

Group

Control Group

Figure 4. Heredity and Harmful Habits

Table 5. The Influence of BMI and Nutrition in Patients with Acute Coronary

Syndrome (ACS)

No.

Main group

Control group

n=60

%

n=20

%

1.

BMI: normal

Overweight

Obesity 1-2 degrees

13

35

12

22

58

20

2

17

1

10

85

5

2.

Nutrition: fatty

Not greasy

37

23

62

38

15

5

75

25

3.

Gender: male

women

36

24

60

40

15

5

75

25

4.

Age: 40-59 years

60-79 years old

33

27

55

45

13

7

65

35

Analysis Based on Table and Figure 5

The data presented in Table and Figure 5 clearly indicate that 35 patients (58%) had excess

div weight

,

and 12 patients (20%) were diagnosed with Grade I–II obesity

,

while only 13

patients (22%) had a normal div mass index (BMI)

.

Dietary habits revealed that a majority

of respondents—37 patients (62%)

regularly consumed fatty foods

,

while only 24 patients

(38%) reported a lower preference for such dishes. This dietary factor is considered


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

significant in the development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In terms of gender

distribution, the pathology was more prevalent among men (36 patients, 60%) than women

(24 patients, 40%)

.

According to the age classification of the World Health Organization

(WHO), the condition was more common among the young (18–44 years) and middle-aged

(45–59 years) population. Specifically, 33 patients (55%) were in the 40–59 age range,

compared

to

27 patients (45%) aged 60–79 (elderly and senile age categories).

Normal

Overweight

Obesity Grade I–II

Main Group

22% 58% 20%

Control Group

10% 85% 5%

Figure 5a. Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI)

Group Fatty Foods (%) Non-Fatty Foods (%)
Main Group

62% 38%

Control Group

75% 25%


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Fatty

Non-fatty

Diet

Figure 5b. Nutrition in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

Group

Men (%) Women (%)

Main Group

60%

40%

Control Group

75%

25%

Legend:

Men

Women

Figure 5c. Gender Distribution in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Legend:

Ages 40–59

Ages 60–79

Figure 5g. Age Distribution of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

For the early diagnosis of ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEMI), urgent

interventions are required to relieve chest pain, reduce myocardial workload and oxygen

demand, limit the size of necrosis in the case of myocardial infarction, and to manage and

prevent complications such as shock and life-threatening arrhythmias

.

Shock was observed

in 15 patients (25%) in the main group and in 2 patients (10%) in the control group. No

patients in the main group reported pain relief after nitroglycerin administration

,

which

confirms the accuracy of STEMI diagnosis in this group, while 3 patients (15%) in the

control group did report pain relief.A history of myocardial infarction was confirmed

through interviews with relatives in 7 patients (12%) in the main group and 1 patient (5%) in

the control group.Hereditary factors played a key role, with 41 patients (68%) having a

family history of hypertension

,

9 patients (15%) with diabetes mellitus

,

and other

comorbidities including fatty liver disease (1.6%), chronic hepatitis (3.3%), and chronic

gastritis (8.3%), which contributed to worsening clinical conditions.Harmful habits such as

smoking (21 patients, 35%) and alcohol consumption (22 patients, 37%) were also identified

as important contributing factors.

According to the analysis, 35 patients (58%) were overweight, and 12 patients (20%)

had Grade I–II obesity. Only 13 patients (22%) had a normal div mass index (BMI).

As expected, the majority of patients (37 individuals, 62%) reported regularly consuming

fatty foods, while only 24 patients (38%) had a lower preference for high-fat meals, which is

a notable contributing factor to the development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The

condition was more prevalent among men (36 patients, 60%) than women (24 patients,

40%).Based on the World Health Organization (WHO) age classification, the disease

affected primarily the young (18–44 years) and middle-aged (45–59 years) population.

Specifically, 33 patients (55%) were in the 40–59 age group, compared to 27 patients (45%)

aged 60–79 (elderly and senile age categories).

Conclusion

Early diagnosis of ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEMI) reveals that the

aforementioned factors play a significant role in predisposing individuals to this pathology.

References

1.

Vyshlov, E.V. and Markov, V.A. (2011).

Thrombolytic Therapy in Myocardial

Infarction

. 147 p.

2.

Denisova, I.N. and Lesnyak, O.M. (2013).

General Medical Practice: National

Guidelines

(2 vols). Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 1864 p.


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

M

ay

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

3.

Kashtalap, V.V., Kochergina, A.M., Kochergin, N.A., et al. (2016). Bleeding in

invasive management of patients with acute coronary syndrome: prevalence, current

approaches to risk assessment and prevention (literature review).

Russian Medical Journal

,

12, pp.739–743.

4.

Mosleh, W., Abdel-Qadir, H. and Farkouh, M. (2013). Biomarkers in the emergency

workup of chest pain: uses, limitations, and future.

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

,

80(9), pp.589–598.

5.

Nifontov, E.M. (2014).

Clinical Guidelines (Protocol) for Emergency Medical

Care in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

.

6.

Oganov, R.G. and Mamedov, M.N. (2009).

Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients

with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: National Clinical Guidelines

. Moscow:

MEDI Expo.

7.

Oshchepkova, E.V., Konosova, I.D. and Efremova, Y.E. (2016). On the meeting

of the cardiology commission held on June 3, 2016.

Cardiology Bulletin

, pp.4–11.

8.

Van de Werf, F., Bax, J., Betriu, A., et al. (2008). Management of acute

myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: Task

Force of the European Society of Cardiology.

European Heart Journal

, 29(23), pp.2909–

2945.

9.

Chazov, E.I., Boytsov, S.A. and Ipatov, P.V. (2008). A major challenge:

Improving treatment technology for ACS as a key mechanism for reducing cardiovascular

mortality in the Russian Federation.

Modern Medical Technologies

, (1), pp.35–38.

10.

Shpektor, A.V. and Vasilieva, E.Yu. (2013).

Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation

Myocardial Infarction

.

11.

Vladimirskaia, T.E., Adzerikho, I.E. and Shved, I.A. (2014). Thrombolytic

therapy of venous thrombosis using nano-containers: an experimental study.

Phlebology

,

8(3), pp.25–30.

References

Vyshlov, E.V. and Markov, V.A. (2011). Thrombolytic Therapy in Myocardial Infarction. 147 p.

Denisova, I.N. and Lesnyak, O.M. (2013). General Medical Practice: National Guidelines (2 vols). Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 1864 p.

Kashtalap, V.V., Kochergina, A.M., Kochergin, N.A., et al. (2016). Bleeding in invasive management of patients with acute coronary syndrome: prevalence, current approaches to risk assessment and prevention (literature review). Russian Medical Journal, 12, pp.739–743.

Mosleh, W., Abdel-Qadir, H. and Farkouh, M. (2013). Biomarkers in the emergency workup of chest pain: uses, limitations, and future. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 80(9), pp.589–598.

 Nifontov, E.M. (2014). Clinical Guidelines (Protocol) for Emergency Medical Care in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

 Oganov, R.G. and Mamedov, M.N. (2009). Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: National Clinical Guidelines. Moscow: MEDI Expo.

 Oshchepkova, E.V., Konosova, I.D. and Efremova, Y.E. (2016). On the meeting of the cardiology commission held on June 3, 2016. Cardiology Bulletin, pp.4–11.

 Van de Werf, F., Bax, J., Betriu, A., et al. (2008). Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal, 29(23), pp.2909–2945.

 Chazov, E.I., Boytsov, S.A. and Ipatov, P.V. (2008). A major challenge: Improving treatment technology for ACS as a key mechanism for reducing cardiovascular mortality in the Russian Federation. Modern Medical Technologies, (1), pp.35–38.

 Shpektor, A.V. and Vasilieva, E.Yu. (2013). Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

 Vladimirskaia, T.E., Adzerikho, I.E. and Shved, I.A. (2014). Thrombolytic therapy of venous thrombosis using nano-containers: an experimental study. Phlebology, 8(3), pp.25–30.