Authors

  • G. Khaydarova
    Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmscr/Volume04Issue01-07

Keywords:

Auditory neuropathy hearing loss

Abstract

The article presents the results of the examination of children with auditory neuropathy.  comparative indicators of otoacoustic emission and short-latency auditory evoked potentials are given. In children with AN, there were violations of the transmission of acoustic signals to the central auditory system, as well as violations of the maturation of the auditory pathways and centers.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 01-2024

37


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

01

P

AGES

:

37-41

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

The article presents the results of the examination of children with auditory neuropathy. comparative indicators of

otoacoustic emission and short-latency auditory evoked potentials are given. In children with AN, there were

violations of the transmission of acoustic signals to the central auditory system, as well as violations of the maturation

of the auditory pathways and centers.

KEYWORDS

Auditory neuropathy, hearing loss.

INTRODUCTION

Auditory neuropathy (AN) - retrocochlear lesion,

classroom neuropathy is a symptom complex

characterized by the normal functioning of the inner

ear and impaired processing of sound information in

the deeper parts of the auditory system. According to

world statistics, about 1 out of 10 children with chronic

hearing loss suffer from this type of hearing system

lesion. [1, 2, 3].

It is already known that with AN, unlike sensorineural

hearing loss, the outer hair cells are not damaged, the

complexity of diagnosis and the variety of the clinical

Research Article

AUDIOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN AUDITORY NEUROPATHY

Submission Date:

January 06, 2024,

Accepted Date:

January 11, 2024,

Published Date:

January 16, 2024

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmscr/Volume04Issue01-07


G. Khaydarova

Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijmscr

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 01-2024

38


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

01

P

AGES

:

37-41

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

picture of this disorder complicates the choice of a

rehabilitation method [4].

Various symptoms of AN are explained by functional

disorders or pathological changes in the peripheral

part of the auditory analyzer. Nevertheless, with AN,

the main clinical manifestation is sensorineural hearing

loss of varying degrees with the preserved function of

the outer hair cells. Patients have otoacoustic emission

(OAE), but there are no short-latency auditory evoked

potentials (SAEPs).

In studies, it has been studied that in patients with AN,

the usual methods of rehabilitation tactics that help

patients with sensorineural hearing loss are not always

effective [5,6]. However, most studies on the study of

the features of AN were performed on small groups of

patients, there is a contradiction in the results obtained

by different authors.

The purpose of the study:

to study the indicators of

OAE and SAEPs in auditory neuropathy in dynamics.

METHOD

180 children with hearing impairments were examined.

36 children with auditory neuropathy were selected

from them. This was 20% of all patients. Among the

surveyed 20 were boys (56%), 16 were girls (44%).

The majority of patients (29 people) were diagnosed

with AN before the age of 5 years. In 5 patients, AN was

detected at the age of 1-3 years. In one patient, AN was

detected in adolescence.

The method of registration of otoacoustic emission

and short-latency auditory evoked potentials of the

brain were used as objective methods for assessing

hearing. The study was carried out at the initial

treatment and in dynamics after 3 months.

The study was carried out on the Neuro-Audio device.

To register the OAE, a probe was used, in which two

phones and a microphone are located. One tone is

continuously fed through one phone, and a second

tone is continuously fed through another. The

microphone provides OAE registration and control of

the level of test tones. To highlight the OAE, it is also

necessary to minimize the level of input noise.

Therefore, the examination was carried out in a quiet

room, and the probe is hermetically installed in the

external auditory canal.

The stimuli were broadband acoustic clicks presented

with a repetition rate of 20-50/s. The response signal

emitted by the microphone is amplified at a bandwidth

from 500 to 5000 Hz and sent to the computer via an

analog-to-digital converter.

The source of sound stimuli for the registration of

SAEPs were in-ear phones with a pre-sized earbud. Cup

silver chloride electrodes were used to register brain

responses. The electrodes were fixed on the area at

the border of the scalp (reference electrode) and in the


background image

Volume 04 Issue 01-2024

39


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

01

P

AGES

:

37-41

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

area of the mastoid processes on the right and left

(active electrodes). In studies, the interelectrode

resistance did not exceed 5 ohms, which was achieved

by pretreatment of the patient's skin and the use of

special conductive gels. Various types of stimuli were

used during the VSWP - an acoustic click with a duration

of 100 ms, tonal signals with a frequency of 1000, 4000,

2000 and 500 Hz.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The analysis of the results showed that all the patients

with AN examined by us had an operation on the right

and left ear during the initial examination. The

exception was one patient in whom the OAE was

registered only on one ear.

Acoustic reflex was not registered in 55% of children

with AN. In 29% of children, acoustic reflex was

registered at frequencies of 500 Hz and 1000 Hz. The

threshold for registering the reflex in these cases was

120 dB.

We obtained the following results when registering

SAEPs: in 95% of children, SAEPs was not registered

during primary and repeated examinations. In 2 (5%)

children, a VSWP was registered for sound stimuli with

a level of 95-103 dB.

AN refers to sound perception disorders and differs

from the rest of the hearing pathology in the topic of

damage to the structures of the inner ear and auditory

nerve [7]. With AN, the outer hair cells are preserved,

thanks to which the TEOAEs and DPOAEs are

registered. The presence of OAE in the absence SAEPs

of or registration of SAEPs only for maximum incentive

levels is a generally recognized feature specific to AN.

However, the data obtained by us indicate that in some

patients with AN, OAEs may disappear over time.

According to our data, this was observed in 22% of

patients. Similar cases were reported in the J.Attias

study [8] (tab 1). Table 1 shows the results of a dynamic

OAE study in children with HF 3 months after the initial

examination.

Table 1

Comparative analysis of the UAE registration results in patients

with auditory neuropathy (N=36)

the OAE was registered

at the initial examination

the OAE was registered after 3

months

Percentage quantity

92%

76%


background image

Volume 04 Issue 01-2024

40


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

01

P

AGES

:

37-41

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Significant changes in patients with AN were also

detected during the registration of SAEPs. In 95% of

patients with auditory neuropathy, SAEPs was not

recorded during stimulation of both the right and left

ear. Only in 2 out of 36 patients, SAEPs was registered

for sound stimuli with a level of 95-103 dB.

Repeated examination of patients with auditory

neuropathy did not reveal any changes in the SAEPs.

Dynamic observation was carried out in order to

analyze the variability of the indicators of registration

of SAEPs and OAE in children with AN (tab 2).

Table 2

Dynamics of changes in the indicators of registration of VSWP and SVOAE during repeated

examinations

Number of

children

Frequency of occurrence (%)

Increase in

thresholds

Decrease in

thresholds

Stability of

thresholds

SAEPs

OAE

SAEPs

OAE

SAEPs

OAE

36

-

-

-

-

100

100

The data obtained indicates that a single study of

auditory function in children is not enough and requires

dynamic observation.

Based on the above, the electrophysiological criteria

for the diagnosis of hearing loss are quite definite and

do not allow for discrepancies. At the same time, the

results of instrumental studies of patients with

auditory neuropathy are not always unambiguous and

require a deep understanding of the complexity of the

mechanisms of sound perception.

Timely identification of the features of the nature of

pathology in the sound perception system is of great

clinical importance due to the difference in the tactics

of treatment and rehabilitation of such patients. This,

in turn, makes it possible to carry out a full-fledged

rehabilitation of such patients.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 01-2024

41


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

01

P

AGES

:

37-41

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

CONCLUSION

The features of auditory function in patients with

auditory neuropathy indicate differences in the

mechanisms underlying the disorders of auditory

function in these groups of patients. Differences in the

structure of risk factors in patients with AN from the

rest of the hearing pathology indicate the etiological

heterogeneity of these forms. This gives grounds for

their separation into independent nosological units.

The results obtained showed that children with AN, on

the one hand, have violations of the transmission of

acoustic signals to the central auditory system, on the

other - violations of the maturation of the auditory

pathways and centers.

REFERENCES

1.

Kaga K., Nakamura M., Shinogami M., Tsuzuku T.,

Yamada K., Shindo M. Auditory nerve disease of

both ears revealed by auditory brain- stem

responses, electrocochleography and otoacoustic

emissions. Scand Audiol 1996; N25: P.233-238.

2.

Starr A., Picton T.W., Sininger Y.S., Hood L.J., Berlin

C.I. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996; N119: P.741-

753.

3.

Deltenre P., Mansbach A., Bozet C., Clercx A.,

Hecox K. (1997). Auditory neuropathy: A report on

three cases with early onsets and major neonatal

illnesses. Electroencephalography and Clinical

Neurophysiology, 104, P.17-22.

4.

Rance G. Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and

its perceptual consequences. Trends Amplif 2005;

N9: P.1-43

5.

Picton T.W. Auditory neuropathy

when time is

broke. In: Human Auditory-Evoked Potentials.

Plural Publishing Inc 2011; P.648.

6.

Hood L.J., Morlet T. Current issues in auditory

neuropathy spectrum disorder. In: K.E. Tremblay,

R.F. Burkard. Eds. Translational Perspectives in

Auditory Neuroscience. Plural Publishing 2012;

P.577.

7.

Madden C., Rutter M., Hilbert L., J.H.Greinwald.,

D.I.Choo (2002). Clinical and audiological features

in auditory neuropathy. Arch Otolaryngol Head

Neck Surg 128, P.1026-1030.

8.

Attias J., Raveh E. (2007). Transient deafness in

young candidates for cochlear implants. Audiol

Neuro Otol 12 (5), P.325-333.

References

Kaga K., Nakamura M., Shinogami M., Tsuzuku T., Yamada K., Shindo M. Auditory nerve disease of both ears revealed by auditory brain- stem responses, electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1996; N25: P.233-238.

Starr A., Picton T.W., Sininger Y.S., Hood L.J., Berlin C.I. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996; N119: P.741-753.

Deltenre P., Mansbach A., Bozet C., Clercx A., Hecox K. (1997). Auditory neuropathy: A report on three cases with early onsets and major neonatal illnesses. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 104, P.17-22.

Rance G. Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences. Trends Amplif 2005; N9: P.1-43

Picton T.W. Auditory neuropathy—when time is broke. In: Human Auditory-Evoked Potentials. Plural Publishing Inc 2011; P.648.

Hood L.J., Morlet T. Current issues in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. In: K.E. Tremblay, R.F. Burkard. Eds. Translational Perspectives in Auditory Neuroscience. Plural Publishing 2012; P.577.

Madden C., Rutter M., Hilbert L., J.H.Greinwald., D.I.Choo (2002). Clinical and audiological features in auditory neuropathy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128, P.1026-1030.

Attias J., Raveh E. (2007). Transient deafness in young candidates for cochlear implants. Audiol Neuro Otol 12 (5), P.325-333.