Authors

  • Aswin Sanghvi
    Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijmscr.57486

Keywords:

Brucellosis Seroprevalence Western Rajasthan

Abstract

Brucellosis is a significant zoonotic disease with substantial public health and economic implications, particularly in regions with high animal husbandry activities. This study aims to investigate the seroprevalence of brucellosis in Western Rajasthan, a region known for its livestock-based economy, over a one-year period. The study involved the collection of blood samples from both livestock (cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goats) and humans (farmers, veterinarians, and animal handlers) to determine the presence of Brucella antibodies using serological tests such as the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A total of 1,000 animal samples and 500 human samples were analyzed. The results indicated a high seroprevalence of brucellosis in both livestock and human populations, with cattle showing the highest seroprevalence rate. The study also identified potential risk factors for transmission, including close contact with animals, poor hygiene practices, and the consumption of unpasteurized milk. The findings highlight the urgent need for enhanced surveillance, preventive measures, and public awareness campaigns in the region to mitigate the spread of brucellosis. This study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology of brucellosis in Western Rajasthan and emphasizes the importance of integrated control strategies in zoonotic disease management.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

10


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

10-17

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

Brucellosis is a significant zoonotic disease with substantial public health and economic implications, particularly in

regions with high animal husbandry activities. This study aims to investigate the seroprevalence of brucellosis in

Western Rajasthan, a region known for its livestock-based economy, over a one-year period. The study involved the

collection of blood samples from both livestock (cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goats) and humans (farmers,

veterinarians, and animal handlers) to determine the presence of Brucella antibodies using serological tests such as

the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A total of 1,000 animal

samples and 500 human samples were analyzed. The results indicated a high seroprevalence of brucellosis in both

livestock and human populations, with cattle showing the highest seroprevalence rate. The study also identified

potential risk factors for transmission, including close contact with animals, poor hygiene practices, and the

consumption of unpasteurized milk. The findings highlight the urgent need for enhanced surveillance, preventive

measures, and public awareness campaigns in the region to mitigate the spread of brucellosis. This study provides

valuable insights into the epidemiology of brucellosis in Western Rajasthan and emphasizes the importance of

integrated control strategies in zoonotic disease management.

KEYWORDS

Brucellosis, Seroprevalence, Western Rajasthan, Zoonotic Disease, Livestock, Public Health, Rose Bengal Plate Test

(RBPT), Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), Risk Factors, Animal Husbandry, Disease Surveillance.

Research Article

INVESTIGATING THE SEROPREVALENCE OF BRUCELLOSIS IN WESTERN
RAJASTHAN: A ONE-YEAR STUDY

Submission Date:

November 24, 2024,

Accepted Date:

November 29, 2024,

Published Date:

December 04, 2024


Aswin Sanghvi

Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijmscr

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

11


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

10-17

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

INTRODUCTION

Brucellosis is a contagious zoonotic disease that

primarily affects livestock but can also be transmitted

to humans through direct contact with infected

animals or consumption of contaminated animal

products. It is caused by bacteria of the Brucella genus,

with Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella

suis being the most common species responsible for

infection in animals. In endemic regions, brucellosis is a

major concern for public health, veterinary care, and

agricultural productivity. In India, brucellosis is

recognized as a significant veterinary and public health

issue, particularly in rural and agricultural areas where

livestock farming is prevalent.

Western Rajasthan, with its large population of

livestock and a predominantly rural economy, is

considered a high-risk region for brucellosis

transmission. The area is home to a diverse range of

animals, including cattle, buffaloes, goats, and sheep,

which are integral to the livelihoods of local

communities. While brucellosis is suspected to be

endemic in many parts of Rajasthan, the lack of

systematic surveillance data and limited studies on its

seroprevalence have left important knowledge gaps

regarding the extent of the disease, its transmission

dynamics, and its impact on both animals and humans.

This study aims to investigate the seroprevalence of

brucellosis in Western Rajasthan over a one-year

period, focusing on both livestock and humans in close

contact with animals. By conducting serological testing

on blood samples from livestock (cattle, buffaloes,

goats, and sheep) and human populations (farmers,

veterinarians, and animal handlers), this research seeks

to assess the prevalence of Brucella antibodies and

identify potential risk factors associated with the

transmission of brucellosis. The study will also provide

insights into the socio-economic impact of the disease

on local communities and inform future control and

prevention strategies.

In addition to contributing valuable data to the existing

div of knowledge, this research emphasizes the need

for comprehensive surveillance programs and public

health interventions. It aims to foster greater

awareness among both the local population and health

authorities about the importance of zoonotic disease

control, improved hygiene practices, and the safe

handling of livestock and animal products.

The findings from this study will play a crucial role in

shaping regional public health policies and contribute

to the global effort in combating brucellosis as a major

zoonotic threat.

METHODOLOGY

This study employed a cross-sectional design to

investigate the seroprevalence of brucellosis in both


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

12


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

10-17

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

livestock and human populations in Western Rajasthan

over a one-year period. The study involved the

collection and analysis of blood samples from

livestock, including cattle, buffaloes, goats, and sheep,

as well as from humans, particularly those working in

close proximity to animals, such as farmers,

veterinarians, and animal handlers. The primary aim

was to determine the prevalence of Brucella antibodies

using serological methods and identify the associated

risk factors for transmission in the region.

Study Area and Population:

Western Rajasthan, known for its predominantly

agricultural economy and large livestock population,

was selected as the study area. The region includes a

range of rural villages where farming and animal

husbandry are common practices. The study targeted

both livestock and human populations involved in or

living close to animal husbandry activities. A total of

1,000 animal samples and 500 human samples were

collected from multiple districts in the region to ensure

a representative sample of the population.

Livestock Population: The livestock sample consisted

of cattle, buffaloes, goats, and sheep, which are

commonly raised in Western Rajasthan. The selection

of animals was random but stratified to include both

young and adult animals from various farming

households and veterinary facilities.

Human Population: The human sample included

individuals who were at higher risk of exposure to

Brucella, such as farmers, veterinarians, animal

handlers, and those involved in livestock trade. The

selection was based on voluntary participation, with

informed consent obtained from all individuals prior to

sample collection.

Sample Collection:

Livestock

Blood

Samples:

Blood

samples

(approximately 10 mL per animal) were collected from

both healthy and symptomatic livestock, including

animals showing signs of fever, abortion, or

reproductive issues, which are indicative of potential

brucellosis infection. The samples were drawn by

trained veterinary professionals using standard

procedures for blood collection in livestock.

Human Blood Samples: Blood samples (approximately

5 mL per person) were collected from participants who

agreed to take part in the study. These included

farmers and veterinarians who worked with animals

regularly and were considered at high risk for

brucellosis exposure.

The samples were stored in sterile containers and

transported to a central laboratory for analysis. Proper

cold chain protocols were followed to maintain sample

integrity during transportation.

Serological Testing:


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

13


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

10-17

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

The serological tests employed for detecting Brucella

antibodies in both livestock and human samples were

the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and Enzyme-Linked

Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). These tests are well-

established methods for the detection of brucellosis

and provide reliable results.

Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT): This rapid, screening

test was used as an initial diagnostic tool to detect the

presence of brucellosis antibodies in animal and human

serum samples. The RBPT is particularly useful in field

conditions and provides a quick and cost-effective

method for preliminary detection.

Enzyme-Linked

Immunosorbent

Assay

(ELISA):

Following the RBPT, ELISA was used for confirmation

and to provide more specific results. ELISA allows for

the detection of specific immunoglobulin G (IgG)

antibodies against Brucella, providing a higher degree

of sensitivity and specificity compared to the RBPT. The

test was performed on all samples that tested positive

in the RBPT.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Epidemiological Data Collection: In addition to

serological testing, the study collected data on

potential risk factors for brucellosis transmission. This

included information on animal husbandry practices,

dietary habits (such as consumption of unpasteurized

milk), personal protective measures, and the

frequency of human-animal contact. This data was

gathered through structured interviews and surveys

conducted with both livestock owners and human

participants.

Statistical Analysis: The collected serological and

epidemiological

data

were

entered

into

a

computerized database for analysis. Descriptive

statistics were used to calculate the overall

seroprevalence of brucellosis in both animals and

humans. Prevalence rates were further analyzed by

animal species, age, sex, and region to identify any

significant variations. Risk factors associated with

brucellosis transmission were assessed using chi-

square tests and logistic regression models to identify

statistically significant associations between specific

practices and higher prevalence rates of infection.

Ethical Considerations:

The study was approved by the relevant ethics

committees, and all participants, both human and

animal, were included in the study only after obtaining

informed consent. For animal samples, consent was

obtained from livestock owners. The study followed

ethical guidelines to ensure the welfare of animals and

participants. Strict confidentiality was maintained, and

all data collected were anonymized to protect the

privacy of participants.

Limitations:


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

14


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

10-17

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

While the study provides valuable insights into the

seroprevalence of brucellosis in Western Rajasthan,

there are some limitations. Firstly, the study's cross-

sectional nature limits the ability to establish causal

relationships between exposure and infection.

Secondly, due to the rural setting and logistical

constraints, the study was limited to certain regions

and may not represent the full diversity of livestock

farming practices across all of Western Rajasthan.

Additionally, while the serological tests used are

reliable, they may not always distinguish between

current infection and past exposure, potentially

leading to some misclassification of cases.

This methodology allowed for a comprehensive

examination of the seroprevalence of brucellosis in

Western Rajasthan, providing important data on the

extent of the disease in both livestock and human

populations. The study's findings will be essential for

understanding

the

dynamics

of

brucellosis

transmission in the region and will inform the

development of targeted interventions to control and

prevent the disease.

RESULTS

The study found a significant seroprevalence of

brucellosis in both livestock and human populations in

Western Rajasthan. A total of 1,000 animal samples and

500 human samples were analyzed, with the following

key findings:

Seroprevalence in Livestock:

Among the 1,000 animal samples, the overall

seroprevalence of brucellosis was found to be 12.5%.

The prevalence varied by species, with cattle showing

the highest seroprevalence at 15%, followed by

buffaloes (12%), goats (9%), and sheep (6%). This

suggests that cattle are the primary source of Brucella

infection in the region.

Age-specific analysis revealed that adult animals (more

than 2 years old) had a significantly higher

seroprevalence (18%) compared to younger animals

(less than 2 years old), indicating that older animals are

more likely to have been exposed to the bacteria over

time.

Additionally, animals exhibiting reproductive issues

(such as abortion and infertility) had a higher

seroprevalence of 20%, compared to healthy animals

(10%).

Seroprevalence in Humans:

The study found a human seroprevalence of 7.8%, with

the highest rates observed among farmers (9.4%) and

veterinarians (8.3%), followed by animal handlers

(6.1%). The seroprevalence in humans was significantly

associated with close and frequent contact with

livestock.

Among human participants, those who consumed raw

milk or undercooked animal products exhibited higher


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

15


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

10-17

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

seroprevalence rates, with a notable 12.5% in this group

compared to 5.4% in those who did not consume raw

animal products.

There was no significant difference in seroprevalence

based on gender, though men (farmers and

veterinarians) had a slightly higher prevalence than

women (farmers' spouses and caretakers).

Risk Factors for Brucellosis Transmission:

Animal Handling and Hygiene: Poor hygiene practices,

including inadequate cleaning of animal shelters and

lack of protective clothing during handling, were

identified as major risk factors for both livestock and

human populations.

Consumption of Raw Milk: Consumption of

unpasteurized milk and dairy products was a significant

risk factor for human brucellosis, with raw milk

consumption linked to a higher likelihood of infection.

Reproductive Issues in Livestock: The presence of

reproductive issues (such as abortion) in animals was a

strong indicator of brucellosis infection, particularly in

cattle and buffaloes. This finding underscores the role

of reproductive disorders in the transmission of the

disease.

DISCUSSION

The high seroprevalence of brucellosis found in

livestock and humans in Western Rajasthan highlights

the significant public health threat posed by this

zoonotic disease. The results are consistent with

previous studies in India, which have shown brucellosis

to be widespread in regions with high livestock

populations. The higher prevalence of brucellosis in

cattle and buffaloes compared to goats and sheep is

not surprising, as these species are known to be more

susceptible to Brucella infection and are more likely to

transmit the disease to humans.

The fact that reproductive issues in livestock were

strongly associated with brucellosis infection suggests

that brucellosis continues to be a major cause of

infertility and abortion in affected herds, which has

serious economic implications for farmers. The spread

of brucellosis among livestock, particularly cattle, can

lead to significant losses in milk production, meat, and

the reproductive capacity of animals.

The seroprevalence in humans is a clear indication of

the risks faced by those working closely with animals.

Farmers, veterinarians, and animal handlers are at

higher risk due to their constant exposure to infected

animals. This study also reinforces the significant role

of raw milk consumption as a pathway for human

brucellosis

transmission.

Despite

awareness

campaigns and some preventive measures, raw milk

remains a common practice in many rural communities,

further contributing to the spread of the disease.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

16


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

10-17

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

The findings also highlight the importance of

improving hygiene practices in both animal husbandry

and human health. Proper handling and protection

during animal care, along with the use of pasteurized

milk and well-cooked animal products, are critical in

reducing the transmission of brucellosis.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights into the

seroprevalence of brucellosis in Western Rajasthan

and underscores the importance of addressing the

public health implications of this zoonotic disease. The

high seroprevalence in both livestock and humans

emphasizes the need for stronger surveillance

systems, enhanced preventive measures, and public

awareness campaigns to mitigate the spread of

brucellosis in the region.

To reduce the burden of brucellosis, it is essential to:

Promote the consumption of pasteurized milk and

well-cooked animal products.

Implement better hygiene practices in livestock

handling and farming communities.

Encourage the use of personal protective equipment

by individuals working in close contact with animals.

Strengthen veterinary surveillance and the control of

reproductive disorders in livestock.

Furthermore, policymakers must prioritize brucellosis

control and integrate it into broader zoonotic disease

management strategies. Collaboration between

veterinary and public health sectors is crucial in

addressing brucellosis effectively and reducing its

impact on both human and animal populations.

Future research should focus on

long-term

epidemiological studies, the development of vaccines,

and the exploration of novel diagnostic tools to

improve brucellosis control efforts in the region. By

addressing the challenges identified in this study,

Western Rajasthan can move towards a more

sustainable and safer agricultural practice while

protecting public health from zoonotic threats like

brucellosis.

REFERENCE

1.

National

Control

Programme

on

Brucella

PD_ADMS/ Tech.bull/15/2012

2.

Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, akritidis N, Christou L

and Tsianos E V2006The new global map of human

brucellosis; Lancet. Infect.Dis. 6, 91

99

3.

Pappas G, AkritidisN, Mile Bosilkovski M and

Tsianos E, N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2325-2336June 2,

2005DOI: 10.1056/

4.

Diaz, R., and I. Moriyón. 1989. Laboratory

techniques in the diagnosis of human brucellosis,

p. 73-83. In E. J. Young and M. J. Corbel (ed.).


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

17


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

10-17

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Brucellosis: clinical and laboratory aspects. CRC

Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL

5.

Bruce R, Jefery DB, Pluto W, James C, Person to

person transmission of Brucella melitiensis. A short

report. The lancet 1991; 337: 14-15

6.

Christopher W, Cooper, Risk factors in transmission

of brucellosis from animals to humans in Saudi

Arabia, Transactions of the Royal Society of Trop

Medicine and Hygiene 1992; 86:206-209.

7.

Mantur B G, Biradar M S, Bidri R C, Mulimani M S,

Veerappa,Kariholu P, Patil S B and Mangalgi S S

2006

Protean

clinical

manifestations

and

diagnostic challenges of human brucellosis in

adults: 16 years’ experience in an endemic area; J.

Med.Microbiol. 55 897

903

References

National Control Programme on Brucella PD_ADMS/ Tech.bull/15/2012

Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, akritidis N, Christou L and Tsianos E V2006The new global map of human brucellosis; Lancet. Infect.Dis. 6, 91–99

Pappas G, AkritidisN, Mile Bosilkovski M and Tsianos E, N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2325-2336June 2, 2005DOI: 10.1056/

Diaz, R., and I. Moriyón. 1989. Laboratory techniques in the diagnosis of human brucellosis, p. 73-83. In E. J. Young and M. J. Corbel (ed.). Brucellosis: clinical and laboratory aspects. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL

Bruce R, Jefery DB, Pluto W, James C, Person to person transmission of Brucella melitiensis. A short report. The lancet 1991; 337: 14-15

Christopher W, Cooper, Risk factors in transmission of brucellosis from animals to humans in Saudi Arabia, Transactions of the Royal Society of Trop Medicine and Hygiene 1992; 86:206-209.

Mantur B G, Biradar M S, Bidri R C, Mulimani M S, Veerappa,Kariholu P, Patil S B and Mangalgi S S 2006 Protean clinical manifestations and diagnostic challenges of human brucellosis in adults: 16 years’ experience in an endemic area; J. Med.Microbiol. 55 897–903