Authors

  • Bobojonova Shakhnoza Yoldosh Kizi
    University Of Tashkent For Applied Sciences Faculty Of History And Philology Teacher Of The Department Of Foreign Language And Literature, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume03Issue11-28

Keywords:

Discourse linguistics communication

Abstract

The article provides an overview of discourse as a research method and  highlighting its fundamental characteristics in  modern linguistics.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

146


International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN

2771-2281)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

146-148

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

6.

676

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

The article provides an overview of discourse as a research method and highlighting its fundamental characteristics
in modern linguistics.

KEYWORDS

Discourse, linguistics, communication, process of speech, monopredicative unit, extralinguistic.

INTRODUCTION

One of the concepts that occupies an important place
in the field of pragmatic linguistics in world linguistics
and is widely studied today is the concept of discourse.
In pragmalinguistics and cognitive linguistics, the term
discourse is one of the main issues. There are many
definitions of discourse, and each of them reflects
certain aspects of this complex process. Nowadays,
the modern analysis directions of linguistics are
increasing, which helps to study the language more
thoroughly, creates convenience and at the same time
reveals the hidden possibilities of the language.

The study of speech as a process can be studied only in
the case of communication - mutual discourse
(exchange of ideas) between the speaker and the
listener, the appropriate answer to the question.
Therefore, at the end of the 20th century, a new branch
of linguistics, discourseology, was formed as a science
that studies speech communication. The first
communicative recognitions of the discourse were
formed in the 50s of the 20th century. In the existing
sources, at first, the problem was considered as a "unit
with complex syntactic essence" consisting of more
than one sentence. This phenomenon is evaluated in
linguistics as the connection between logical grammar

Research Article

DISCOURSE AND ITS INTERPRETATION IN MODERN LINGUISTICS

Submission Date:

November 16, 2023,

Accepted Date:

November 18, 2023,

Published Date:

November 26, 2023

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume03Issue11-28

Bobojonova Shakhnoza Yoldosh Kizi

University Of Tashkent For Applied Sciences Faculty Of History And Philology Teacher Of The Department Of
Foreign Language And Literature, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijp

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

147


International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN

2771-2281)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

146-148

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

6.

676

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

and colloquial speech. Also, in the 20s of the last
century, in linguistics, the fact that the discourse
phenomenon is related to oral speech, that there are
cases of their expression in the process of speech with
prompts, introductory words, introductory phrases,
which is the basis for their assessment as a "complex
syntactic device" The problem of syntactic discourse in
foreign linguistics was raised by Z. Harris in the 50s of
the last century. By the 70s of the 20th century, the
volume of work related to this issue increased
somewhat.

In the studied studies, discourse was interpreted as a
monopredicative unit of conversational speech. By this
time, terms such as text linguistics, relation of text
research with speech theory, practical stylistics,
communication theory, language teaching, automatic
translation began to be used in scientific sources. One
of the greatest achievements in the syntax of the 70s
of the last century is that the position of grammatical
discourse in spoken speech was formed as a separate
branch of linguistics and a separate source of research
of the problem.

In modern linguistics, we are witnessing the rise of the
science of linguistics based on different linguistic
directions. The field of pragmatics, which is one of the
directions of linguistics, the leadership of views on the
anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics since the end
of the 20th century paved the way for the emergence
of a number of interdisciplinary fields, including
linguopragmatics. In today's modern directions of
linguistics, this scientific field is of particular
importance.

1) If we dwell on the lexical origin of the term discourse,
it is derived from the Latin word "discursus" for
discussion, which means emotional, direct, intuitive,

that is, in contrast to discursive knowledge, with a tool
through discussion. harvest

logical argument to be made means demonstrable
knowledge.

2) Discourse (fr. discours, English speech, from Latin
discosusus "running back and forth; movement,
circulation; conversation"), speech, process of
linguistic activity; manner of speaking. A vague term
for a number of humanities whose subject matter
directly or indirectly includes the study of linguistics,
literary studies, semiotics, sociology, philosophy,
ethnology, and anthropology.

There is no clear and generally accepted definition that
covers the cases and meanings of the term discourse.
To date, discourse and discursive analysis have been
studied by scientists and linguists of different
nationalities in world linguistics, and this term has been
approached in different ways.

From this point of view, the definitions given to
discourse are different. It should be noted that the
definition of the Russian linguist Arutyunova is
accepted by most researchers as the most favorable
definition today. According to him, discourse -
(originating from the French discourse - speech) - a text
considered from the perspective of reality, compatible
with

extralinguistic

(pragmatic,

socio-cultural,

psychological and other) factors; is a form of speech
that is considered as a part of the interaction of people
and their conscious mechanisms (cognitive processes)
as a purposeful social action. Professor T.A. van Dijk
interpreted discourse as a rather broad phenomenon
(a complex conversational phenomenon).

Discourse is a communication event between a listener
and a speaker that takes place in a certain context time


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

148


International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN

2771-2281)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

146-148

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

6.

676

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

and place. Moreover, Discourse is the use of language
in the processes of expression and exchange of ideas,
a certain way of living of language as a separate type
of social activity. Each person has his own
characteristics, although the main elements of the
language - vocabulary and grammatical structure do
not belong only to individuals, but are common, that is,
they apply to a particular language community.
Discourse is closely related to a human thinking,
consciousness. A person's thoughts are formed and
existed in discourse. With the peculiarities of the
discourse and on the basis of the discourse, it becomes
possible to abstractly reflect the existence in a general
way, to think logically and conceptually, leaving the
sphere of individuality and becoming a product of
society.

CONCLUSION

The exploration of discourse unveils a rich
phenomenon of linguistics and if it is defined, it has
intricate

relationship

between

language,

communication, and the multifaceted layers of society.

REFERENCE

1.

Amerian, M., & Esmaili, F. Language and
gender: A critical discourse analysis on gender
representation in a series of international 18
Ahmad & Shah

Critical Discourse Analysis of

an ELT textbooks. International Journal of
Research.

NY. 2015.-P.120.

2.

Azhar, M., Khalid, S., & Mehmood, R. Gender
representation in Pakistani and British English
fiction: A Corpus Based Study. Research on
Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(14), 2014.

P.140.

3.

Basow, S. A. Gender: Stereotypes and roles.
Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. 1992.

4.

Bellert I. On the logicosemantik structures of
utterances // I. Bellert.

Wroclaw: Ossolenium,

1972.

P. 108.

P.126

5.

Bobojonova Sh.Y. Ta’lim iy diskurs va unga

aloqador

hodisalar//

Toshkent

Davlat

Pedagogika Universiteti. Ilmiy axborotlari.

Научный Весиник. Scientific Bulletin. Ilmiy

-

nazariy jurnal 11/2022

6.

Hakimov M. O‘zbek tilida matnning pragmatik

talqini: Filol. fanlari d-

ri … diss. –

Toshkent,

2001.

7.

Bobojonova Sh.Y. Metafora muloqot vositasi
unsuri sifatida// Toshkent Davlat Pedagogika

Universiteti.

Ilmiy

axborotlari.

Научный

Весиник. Scientific Bulletin. Ilmiy

-nazariy jurnal

11/2022

References

Amerian, M., & Esmaili, F. Language and gender: A critical discourse analysis on gender representation in a series of international 18 Ahmad & Shah – Critical Discourse Analysis of an ELT textbooks. International Journal of Research. – NY. 2015.-P.120.

Azhar, M., Khalid, S., & Mehmood, R. Gender representation in Pakistani and British English fiction: A Corpus Based Study. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(14), 2014. – P.140.

Basow, S. A. Gender: Stereotypes and roles. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. 1992.

Bellert I. On the logicosemantik structures of utterances // I. Bellert. – Wroclaw: Ossolenium, 1972. – P. 108. – P.126

Bobojonova Sh.Y. Ta’lim iy diskurs va unga aloqador hodisalar// Toshkent Davlat Pedagogika Universiteti. Ilmiy axborotlari. Научный Весиник. Scientific Bulletin. Ilmiy-nazariy jurnal 11/2022

Hakimov M. O‘zbek tilida matnning pragmatik talqini: Filol. fanlari d-ri … diss. – Toshkent, 2001.

Bobojonova Sh.Y. Metafora muloqot vositasi unsuri sifatida// Toshkent Davlat Pedagogika Universiteti. Ilmiy axborotlari. Научный Весиник. Scientific Bulletin. Ilmiy-nazariy jurnal 11/2022