Volume 03 Issue 08-2023
29
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
08
P
AGES
:
29-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
This article talks about differentiated physical education and researches that the success of differentiated education,
the differentiation of the educational process that directs students to active and effective physical education is a
process that regularly develops and improves.
KEYWORDS
Junior high school students, physical fitness, differentiation and individualization, differentiated physical education,
levels of mastery, levels of differentiation.
INTRODUCTION
In new Uzbekistan, by developing a new methodology
for teaching elementary and junior high school
students, implementing many educational reforms to
apply the experience of developed countries,
"physical, spiritual" in traditional education - there is a
need to radically revise approaches to protecting
intellectual health and strengthening physical
health"[1]. It is becoming urgent to improve the
modern pedagogical system of differentiated physical
education, aimed at reducing the mental stress, fatigue
and exhaustion of the students of the junior class
through physical education, and increasing the
effectiveness of their education. Therefore, based on
the cluster approach, through the development of the
differentiated physical education of the students of the
junior class, there is an opportunity to sufficiently
stabilize their exhaustion, fatigue and weakness in the
first period of continuous education.
In the concept of the development of physical
education and mass sports in the Republic of
Uzbekistan in the period of 2019-2023, "training
programs of educational institutions should include
the formation of healthy lifestyle skills that encourage
physical activity of students and healthy nutrition
organization of events and tasks of introducing special
courses" [2].
Research Article
A LAYERED APPROACH AS A METHOD OF STUDENT ACTIVATION
Submission Date:
August 20, 2023,
Accepted Date:
August 25, 2023,
Published Date:
August 30, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume03Issue08-06
Boborakhimov Sanjar Malikjanovich
Researcher Of Fergana State University, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijp
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 03 Issue 08-2023
30
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
08
P
AGES
:
29-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Classification and individualization of the process of
physical education, of course, includes the orientation
to increase the efficiency of the process and is widely
used in the field of physical education. Because the
need to change the physical load of students of junior
school age with different levels of physical fitness has
been determined in experiments.
Differentiated physical education means goal-oriented
physical formation of students through the
development of their individual characteristics. In this
case, the content of the pedagogical technology of
differentiated physical education is the unity of
pedagogical technologies of differentiated teaching of
movement actions, the development of physical
qualities, the formation of knowledge, methodological
skills and technologies for managing the educational
process.
Without developing the necessary theoretical
justification, the practice of using differentiated
teaching technologies of physical education in a
general education school, only the first unsystematic
attempts to implement them are being made. That is,
an attempt is being made to integrate the health-
giving, developmental, and educational tasks of
physical education.
Many authors have proposed the following as criteria
for grouping students when implementing a
differentiated approach based on the level of physical
fitness of students. For example, Sh.Kh. Khankeldiyev,
together with his students, in his many years of
experience in the student youth contingent, in various
physical exercises in the physical education program,
concretely divided students into "strong", "medium"
and "weak" groups. proposed criteria and made
recommendations for easing students who could not
perform
these
exercises
under
standard
conditions[3;7;8;9].
Another researcher, S.R. Uraimov, presented a large-
scale rating scale for tasks and the results in it to
separate specialized lyceum students according to the
level of physical fitness. This rating scale was
developed for a specific contingent of students, and
students effects on the organism may vary depending
on regional factors, places of residence and other
factors [6].
A number of other authors also suggested the
classification of the content of physical education
depending on the level of physical and functional
training. For example, P. Khodzhayev expressed his
opinions about starting the classification of the
content of physical education in secondary schools
depending on the age and gender characteristics of
students from the level of normative documents on
physical education[10].
Research scientist A. Gujalovsky proposed to divide
students into the following groups according to the
level of mastery:
1. Excellent and quick learners of movement actions.
Pupils of this group are usually distinguished by good
physical development, good or excellent learning in
other subjects.
2. Good and average learners of movement actions.
The physical development of students of this group is
usually average, their mastery of other subjects is
average, less satisfactory [5].
The information presented above allows physical
education teachers to approach the process of
teaching young students, taking into account their
movement abilities, physical development and
functional readiness levels.
Classification is the classification of students into
groups based on some characteristics for their
Volume 03 Issue 08-2023
31
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
08
P
AGES
:
29-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
education, taking into account their individual
characteristics. Also, classification is a form of
organizing the educational process, in which the
teacher works with students based on the educational
content determined according to the qualities they
have and become important for the educational
process.
The success of differentiated education depends to a
large extent on how well it is related to individualized
education. In this case, step-by-step plans and
educational programs are applied to the educational
process. Separate individual training sessions will be
organized for gifted students. The topics of such
training sessions should be reflected in the training
programs. Gifted education can have a positive impact
on the development of the abilities of all classmates.
The classification of the educational process, which
directs students to active and effective physical
education, is a regularly developing and improving
process. During this process, the factors and
conditions affecting the improvement of the
effectiveness of educational differentiation are
determined. Studying the issues of differentiation
approach to the educational process of physical
education in general education schools allows to
identify new solutions to the problem under
investigation.
There are the following classification levels (types) in
physical education at school:
• general school classification; it is related to the
orientation of the educational process in the
framework of one school, more in the upper classes, as
well as in the middle classes, to the appropriate
specialty. The following types of specialization can be
chosen: sports, physical education, physical education
- sports and wellness.
• differentiation within the school. In this case, the
educational process does not take place in this school,
but only in some classes: the sports class, the class of
students who need attention to their health, and so on.
• differentiation within the classroom. As part of this
classification, students are divided into several groups
according to one or another criteria. In these studies,
the level within the class was used to classify the
educational process of physical education.
Classification was carried out according to the
following criteria:
a) state of physical fitness;
b) level of formation of movement actions.
In accordance with these criteria, students were
divided into the following 2-3 groups during physical
education:
• students with high physical fitness;
• students with average physical fitness;
• students with lower physical fitness.
A multidisciplinary approach to education is very
important in working with students of each group. In
the implementation of one factor, it is required to
divide schoolchildren of the same age into groups. The
implementation of the stratified approach helps to
educate physical qualities, creates a basis for
increasing the efficiency of the educational process,
increases the interest of students in physical education
classes, and serves to improve the physical condition of
students.
In addition to the formation of skills and competencies
in physical education, the multifaceted approach is also
a way to activate students. Therefore, it should be used
Volume 03 Issue 08-2023
32
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
08
P
AGES
:
29-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
regularly, sufficient, perfect and concise in order to
fulfill its task, that is, to strengthen the health of
students, to remain a factor of action that increases
the level of physical fitness. The growth and
development of the students' div, the pace and
direction of their individual physical development are
encouraged only if they are selected correctly. Such
children require more attention to students when
choosing exercises and grading them compared to
others. Thus, educational technology is a way of
implementing education. In the theory of physical
education, the following pedagogic concepts can be
defined:
-
Physical education is goal-oriented physical
formation of a person;
-
Physical education is the formation of a person's
ability to achieve a goal in terms of achieving
physical fitness;
-
Teaching physical education is the formation of
goal-oriented knowledge, skills and abilities in
order to master the social experience of achieving
physical fitness;
-
The result of physical education is the level of
achieving physical fitness expressed as the
purpose of physical education;
-
Physical perfection (this concept in a broad sense)
is the goal-oriented essence of physical education,
which consists in forming a harmoniously
developed human organism.
Differentiated physical education is goal-oriented
physical formation of a person through the
development of individual abilities.
The technology of differentiated physical education is
a method of implementing the content of
differentiated physical education through a system of
tools, methods and organizational forms to effectively
achieve the goal of education.
The key to understanding the technological structure
of the learning process is to operate with clearly
defined goals in a row. For this reason, first of all, it is
appropriate to dwell on the problem of goal setting
and the problem of goal orientation in education,
which is a central problem for the pedagogical
technology of education.
-
Clarifying the goals and objectives of the
differentiated physical education technology
aimed at the process of public sports health
improvement of students is closely related to the
content of education, therefore, if:
-
adequate means, methods of training and
development of physical qualities are selected;
-
there is a method - "instrument" for single-value
determination of assessed qualifications and skills;
-
if there are evaluation criteria based on the results
of measuring skills and physical qualities, the issue
is considered diagnostic.
REFERENCES
1.
O‘zbekiston
Respublikasi
Vazirlar
Mahkamasining
«2019
–
2023-yillar
davrida
O‘zbekiston Respublikasida jismoniy tarbiya v
a
ommaviy sportni rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini
tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida» 118
-son. Qarori. 2019-yil
13-fevral
2.
2019
–
2023-
yillar
davrida
O‘zbekiston
Respublikasida jismoniy tarbiya va ommaviy
sportni rivojlantirish konsepsiyasi. Qonun
hujjatlari ma’lumotlar
i milliy bazasi. 2019-yil 14-
fevral. www.lex.uz
3.
Abdullayev A.A., Xankeldiyev Sh.X. Jismoniy
madaniyat nazariyasi va uslubiyoti. Toshkent,
2007.
–
267 b.
4.
Бондаревский
Е.Я.,
Ханкельдиев
Ш.Х.
Физическая подготовленность учащейся
молодежи. –
Ташкент, 198
6.
–
243 с.
Volume 03 Issue 08-2023
33
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
08
P
AGES
:
29-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
5.
Гужаловский
А.А.
Этапность
развития
физических
качеств
и
проблема
оптимизации физической подготовки детей
школьного
возраста.
Автореф
дис…докт..пед.наук. –
Москва, 1979. –
28 с.
6.
Ураимов С.Р. Педагогические особенности
прикладной
физической
подготовки
учащихся
военно
-
технических
лицеев.
Автореф. дис… док.фил.пед.наук. Чирчик,
2019.
–
50 с.
7.
Ханкельдиев
Ш.Х.
Педагогические
особенности
физического
воспитания
учащейся молодежи в регионах с жарким
климатом Автореф.дис…док.пед.наук. –
Москва,
1991.
–
47 с.
8.
Ханкельдиев
Ш.Х.
Физический
статус
учащейся
молодежи.
Монография.
–
Ташкент, 2018. –
432с.
9.
Ханкельдиев Ш.Х., Абдуллаев А.А. Проблемы
построения
нормативных
основ
государственных
стандартов
по
физическому воспитанию. //«Фан
-
спорта»,
2005
. №1. –
С. 20
-23.
10.
Ходжаев П. Развитие двигательных качеств
учащихся
VI–VII
классов
школ.
Автореф.дис…канд.пед.наук. –
Ташкент,
1993.
–
22с.
11.
Talapov B., Gapparov E. THE PROCESS OF
DEMOCRATIZING LOCAL COMMUNITY IN THE
GOVERNMENT //Scientific and Technical
Journal of Namangan Institute of Engineering
and Technology.
–
2019.
–
Т. 1. –
№. 2. –
С. 177
-
181.
12.
Талапов Б. А. Западная демократия: успехи и
противоречия //Научное обозрение: теория
и практика. –
2012.
–
№. 2. –
С. 30
-33.
13.
Талапов Б. А. Идеологические угрозы в
сознании
молодежи
под
маской"
демократии" //Credo New. –
2016.
–
№. 2. –
С.
14-14.
14.
Talapov B. A. ELECTRONIC DEMOCRACY IN
UZBEKISTAN: DEVELOPMENT AND PROBLEMS
//Scientific and Technical Journal of Namangan
Institute of Engineering and Technology.
–
2019.
–
Т. 1. –
№. 3. –
С. 135
-141.
