Авторы

  • Yusupova Gulchehra Yuldashevna
    PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Information Technology at the National Pedagogical University of Uzbekistan named after Nizami,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijsr.129835

Ключевые слова:

modeling competencies digital pedagogy informatics teacher digital educational environment professional development.

Аннотация

This article examines modeling skills that are recognized as key to the professional development of computer science teachers in the era of digitalization of education.  The model of formation of these competencies is based on a system-activity approach, which provides for the presence of targeted, substantive, procedural and evaluative components.  The results of the study, which included 45 university teachers, showed that only 26.7% of the respondents have a professionally innovative level of development of modeling competencies.  These data emphasize the need to develop professional development programs and methodological support.  The final part presents practical suggestions for improving the digital training of teachers.

 


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 2, May 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

802

THE COMPETENCE OF A COMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHER TO CREATE AND

APPLY EDUCATIONAL MODELS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL

TRANSFORMATION OF EDUCATION

Yusupova Gulchehra Yuldashevna

PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Information Technology

at the National Pedagogical University of Uzbekistan named after Nizami,

guli69guli69@gmail.com

Аннотация:

В этой статье исследуются навыки моделирования, признаваемые

ключевыми для профессионального развития преподавателей информатики в эпоху

цифровизации образования. В основу модели формирования данных компетенций

положен системно-деятельностный подход, предусматривающий наличие целевого,

содержательного, процедурного и оценочного компонентов. Результаты исследования,

охватившего 45 преподавателей вузов, показали, что только 26,7% опрошенных

обладают

профессионально-инновационным

уровнем

развития

моделирующих

компетенций.

Эти данные подчеркивают необходимость разработки программ

повышения квалификации и методической поддержки.

В заключительной части

представлены практические предложения по улучшению цифровой подготовки

преподавателей.

Annotatsiya:

Ushbu maqola ta'limni raqamlashtirish davrida informatika o'qituvchilarining

kasbiy rivojlanishi uchun kalit sifatida tan olingan modellashtirish ko'nikmalarini o'rganadi.

Ushbu vakolatlarni shakllantirish modeli maqsadli, mazmunli, protsessual va baholovchi

tarkibiy qismlarning mavjudligini ta'minlaydigan tizim-faoliyat yondashuviga asoslanadi. 45 ta

universitet o'qituvchilarini qamrab olgan tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko'rsatdiki, respondentlarning

atigi 26,7 foizi modellashtirish vakolatlarini rivojlantirishning professional va innovatsion

darajasiga ega. Ushbu ma'lumotlar malaka oshirish va metodik qo'llab-quvvatlash dasturlarini

ishlab chiqish zarurligini ta'kidlaydi. Yakuniy qism o'qituvchilarning raqamli tayyorgarligini

yaxshilash bo'yicha amaliy takliflarni taqdim etadi.

Abstract:

This article examines modeling skills that are recognized as key to the professional

development of computer science teachers in the era of digitalization of education. The model

of formation of these competencies is based on a system-activity approach, which provides for

the presence of targeted, substantive, procedural and evaluative components. The results of the

study, which included 45 university teachers, showed that only 26.7% of the respondents have a

professionally innovative level of development of modeling competencies. These data

emphasize the need to develop professional development programs and methodological support.

The final part presents practical suggestions for improving the digital training of teachers.

Ключевые слова:

моделирующие компетенции, цифровая педагогика, преподаватель

информатики, цифровая образовательная среда, профессиональное развитие.

Kalit so'zlar:

modellashtirish vakolatlari, raqamli pedagogika, informatika o'qituvchisi,

raqamli ta'lim muhiti, kasbiy rivojlanish.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 2, May 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

803

Keywords:

modeling competencies, digital pedagogy, informatics teacher, digital educational

environment, professional development.

Introduction

Modern education is increasingly immersed in the digital space, which poses new challenges

for teachers. In particular, this applies to computer science teachers, who need to master the art

of effectively organizing the educational process using digital tools, as well as form educational

models. Scientific problem: What key competencies are needed by a computer science teacher

to ensure effective modeling of educational processes in the context of a digital environment?

The purpose of the research is to create and further develop a model for the formation and

improvement of modeling skills among computer science teachers in the context of the

transition to digital education. This article provides an overview of ways to support such

teachers in developing the necessary competencies, especially in the field of modeling. The

fundamental principle of the proposed approach is the current needs of the modern digital

environment and the desire to ensure high quality and effectiveness of the educational process.

1. Theoretical overview

In the academic environment, modeling competencies are considered as a set of knowledge,

skills and practical skills necessary for a teacher to plan, organize and optimize the learning

process using digital tools. Based on the works of V.A. Slastenin, I.Ya. Lerner and Yu.N. Tura,

pedagogical modeling is seen as a method of systematic organization of the educational process

aimed at achieving predictable learning outcomes.

In scientific discourse, modeling competencies are defined as a combination of knowledge,

skills, and abilities that allow a teacher to design, implement, and improve educational activities

using digital resources (Selevko, 2006; Slastenin et al., 2002).

According to the approach of I.J. Lerner, modeling in pedagogical practice appears as a tool for

the systematic design of the educational process, focused on obtaining planned educational

outcomes (Lerner, 1981).

The competence model of digital pedagogy, based on the concept of DigCompEdu (European

Commission, 2022), develops these ideas by presenting gradations of digital competence of

teachers, ranging from beginner to advanced, innovative level.

The competence model of digital pedagogy, based on DigCompEdu (European Commission,

2022), develops these approaches, defining gradations of digital maturity of teachers, covering

ranges from basic to professionally innovative. Being aware of the specifics of teaching

computer science, the required skills combine methodological and technical aspects, meaning:

Knowledge of digital platforms and modeling tools (e.g. learning management systems,

simulators, virtual laboratories);

The ability to create interactive educational materials based on didactic principles;

The ability to structure and visualize learning processes;

Critical evaluation and analysis of the results of digital interaction;

Self-education skills in a rapidly changing technology environment.

Thus, modeling skills represent a key element of pedagogical work in the digital age. This is

especially important for computer science teachers, who should not only have extensive

knowledge in their field, but also actively participate in the transformation of the educational

environment.

2. Research methodology

This research is based on a multifaceted, interdisciplinary view that harmoniously combines the

provisions of pedagogy, digital didactics, cognitive psychology and information technology


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 2, May 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

804

theories. The methodological foundation is based on a system-based approach (Slastenin et al.,

2002), further enriched by the principles of digital transformation of education (Sergeev, 2021).

This approach implies the perception of the process of forming modeling competencies as a

consciously structured professional activity, decomposed into successive phases: motivational-

value, cognitive, procedural and reflexive-correctional. To achieve this goal, a hypothetical

model for the formation of modeling competencies was developed, covering the following

components:

A target component reflecting the demands of the digital educational environment.;

A substantive component that includes conceptual knowledge about modeling in an educational

environment;

A procedural component that describes the methods, techniques, and tools for organizing

training;

An evaluative and effective component that ensures the determination of the level of

competence formation.

The empirical basis of this research is an analysis of the practical activities of computer science

teachers working in higher education institutions that have implemented digital educational

programs. The following main methods were identified for data collection:

pedagogical observation of the educational process;

expert survey of the teaching staff (the total number of questionnaires is 45);

analysis of the curriculum content;

case studies, interviews with focus groups;

mathematical and statistical processing of the collected information using correlation analysis

and ranking using the Spearman method.

The assessment of the degree of formation of modeling competencies was carried out on the

basis of an adapted model of competence diagnostics, which provides for three skill levels:

basic, advanced and professionally innovative. Confirmation of the reliability of the results

obtained was ensured through the application of the triangulation principle, as well as careful

monitoring of the reliability and validity of the diagnostic tools used.

The reliability of the results was ensured through the use of triangulation methods, as well as

checking the reliability and validity of the diagnostic tools used.

The reliability of the study's conclusions was ensured by using the triangulation method, as well

as a rigorous assessment of the reliability and validity of the diagnostic tools used.

The reliability of the data obtained was guaranteed through the use of triangulation, along with

careful verification of the reliability and validity of the diagnostic tools used.

3. The results of the study

As part of the empirical study, the data obtained from the survey was analyzed. Forty-

five teachers specializing in computer science participated in the survey. All respondents

represented six higher education institutions.

The questionnaire included 18 statements designed to assess the respondents' level of

development of modeling competencies. The assessment was based on a number of key aspects:

the ability to design a digital educational environment, the ability to use information and

communication technologies (ICT) for modeling, the ability to make pedagogical predictions,

and the ability to conduct a reflective assessment of applied digital practices.

3.1. The level of competence formation

The analysis of the data obtained showed the following distribution of teachers by competence

levels (see table 1).

Table 1.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 2, May 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

805

Competence level

Number of teachers

Percentage of the sample

Basic level

12

26.7%

Продвинутый уровень

21

46.7%

Professionally innovative

12

26.7%

It should be emphasized that the teachers had significant difficulties in the following areas:

Using cloud services to build a learning environment (only 38% of teachers confidently use

cloud tools such as Moodle, Google Workspace and similar), which is consistent with

monitoring data from the Ministry of Higher Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan (Ministry

of Higher Education, 2023);

A clear definition of the goals and objectives of the digital lesson based on didactic models

(only 42% showed stable skills in this area);

The organization of effective digital interaction between students when completing project

assignments (the average score on the Likert scale was 3.1 out of 5).

The indicator of the professional and innovative level (26.7%) corresponds to the results of

similar studies in the field of digital competence (Sergeev, 2021).

3.2. Correlation analysis

Spearman's correlation analysis showed a direct relationship between the duration of

teaching experience and the degree of development of modeling competencies (p = 0.62, P <

0.01).Additionally, there was a significant correlation between involvement in advanced

training programs in digital pedagogy and the level of professional and innovative

competencies (p = 0.74, P < 0.01).

3.3. Focus group results

Focus group interviews with teachers (n = 16) revealed the need for systematic methodological

support: 81% of respondents pointed to the lack of practice-oriented courses in pedagogical

modeling, while 69% face difficulties in implementing modern digital tools in their subjects.

Focus group interviews conducted with teachers are one of the options for qualitative research

based on a joint analysis of a given topic or problem by a group of teachers (usually consisting

of 6 to 10 people) under the guidance of a moderator. The purpose of this method is to discover

the opinions, positions, experiences and suggestions of the participants regarding the chosen

issue.

A focus group is not an ordinary, spontaneous conversation, but a well-organized discussion

focused on obtaining the necessary data.

The interview moderator (researcher) formulates questions, directs the discussion, and at the

same time encourages participants to freely express their own views.

With teachers, the participants are, in fact, teachers, teachers, educators – people with

professional experience in the field of education.

As part of the study of computer science teacher competencies, we organized focus group

interviews with computer science teachers in order to find out:

What skills do they consider essential?;

What difficulties do they have to face?;

How do they assess the existing system of teacher training?

4. Discussion of the results

The data obtained clearly indicate a critical need to improve the competencies of

computer science teachers in the field of modeling. Without these skills, the successful

implementation of digital education is difficult. An analysis of the collected materials revealed

that only 26.7% of the teaching staff have a high, innovative and professional level of training.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 2, May 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

806

This picture is consistent with the conclusions presented in other scientific studies, such as the

work of L.G. Sergeev (2021). They also note that the proportion of teachers capable of

effectively designing and applying the digital educational environment remains relatively low,

not exceeding a third.

4.1. Imbalance in professional training

Despite the active introduction of digital tools at universities (according to monitoring

data conducted by the Ministry of Higher Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 84% of

universities use LMS systems in 2023), only 38% of teachers are confident in cloud services

and platforms. This indicates a discrepancy between the progress in technological equipment

and the level of training of the teaching staff.

A more detailed analysis of the survey results revealed that the criterion "competence in

developing models of interdisciplinary digital courses" received the lowest average score (2.9

out of 5). This highlights the need to activate professional development programs, giving

priority to pedagogical design.

4.2. The role of professional development

The high (correlation) degree of relationship (p = 0.74) between the fact of participation

in continuing professional education programs and the indicators of competence clearly

indicates the importance of continuous learning.An analysis of the courses organized by the

National Center for Digital Education showed that teachers who completed programs lasting

over 36 academic hours demonstrated an average increase in competence by 21% compared

with those who did not undergo such training (the control group).

4.3. The needs of educators

As a result of the focus groups, the main needs of the teaching staff were identified:

The development of methodological manuals in the form of ready-made cases for modeling

digital classes (87% of respondents expressed the need).

The inclusion of modeling in the educational standards of teacher training (noted by 64% of

respondents).

Creation of individual digital learning trajectories as a way of professional growth (supported

by 72% of participants).

A comparison with international experience, in particular, with the European DigCompEdu

model, demonstrates that Uzbekistan has the least developed levels of C2–C3 (development and

reflexive application of digital models), while in the European Union this figure reaches 40%

among teachers of technical disciplines (according to the JRC report, 2022).

An analysis of the information received revealed that teachers who completed advanced

training courses exceeding 36 academic hours demonstrated an average 21% increase in

professionalism. This indicator is comparable to the results obtained in the framework of

European educational programs (European Commission, 2022).

The problem of formalization of digital models in the context of pedagogy has already been

addressed in the research of domestic specialists (Tur, 2019).

5. Conclusion and recommendations

The results of the analysis obtained during the study show that the development of modeling

skills among computer science teachers in the era of digitalization of education is unstable. This

requires organized support, which should be provided by educational institutions and bodies

responsible for managing the education system.

The main conclusions

:

The distribution of modeling competencies among teachers is as follows: basic level – 26.7%,

advanced – 46.7%, professional and innovative – 26.7%.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 2, May 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

807

The key obstacles to the development of competencies are:

limited skills in working with digital platforms (only 38% are confident);

insufficient experience in formalizing educational models (average score – 3.1 out of 5);

lack of methodological materials (87% of teachers surveyed indicated).

The positive relationship between participation in advanced training courses and the level of

competence (p = 0.74, p < 0.01) confirms the need to expand the system of continuing

professional education.

A comparative analysis with international experience shows that Uzbek teachers, on average,

lag behind their European counterparts by 1-1.5 DigCompEdu levels.

Recommendations

To develop a national standard for modeling competencies that takes into account the

conditions of digital transformation and is focused on integration with international standards

(for example, DigCompEdu).

To increase the coverage of practice-oriented professional development courses:

lasting from 36 to 72 academic hours, with the involvement of mentors and digital tutors, with a

mandatory case study.

Create an electronic platform "Model-EdTech", which includes:

a library of digital lesson models, video courses and teaching aids, a digital professional growth

tracker.

To introduce a model of "pedagogical modeling" as a key professional competence into the

mandatory teacher training program implemented at pedagogical universities and master's

degree programs in Computer Science and ICT in education.

List of literature:

1. European Commission. (2022). DigCompEdu: The European Framework for the Digital

Competence of Educators. Joint Research Centre.

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcompedu

2. Selevko, G. K. (2006). Competence-based approach in education: Methodology and theory.

Moscow: Research Institute of School Technologies.

3. Sergeev, L. G. (2021). Digital transformation of higher education: Pedagogical challenges

and modeling competencies. Higher Education in Russia, 30(4), 45–52.

https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-4-45-52

4. Slastenin, V. A., Isaev, I. F., & Mishchenko, A. I. (2002). Pedagogics. Moscow: School

Press.

5. Tur, Y. N. (2019). Formation of modeling competence in future teachers of computer

science. Pedagogical Education and Science, (3), 104–110.

6. Ministry of Higher Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Monitoring Report on

the Digitalization of Higher Education Institutions. Tashkent.

7. Lerner, I. Y. (1981). Didactic bases of the teaching methods. Moscow: Pedagogika.

8. Юсупова Г.Ю., Роль моделирования в подготовке учителя информатики: концепция и

ее реализация. Электронное научно-практическое периодическое издание

«Экономика и социум», №2(93) 2022 Стр.1178-1182.

9. Юсупова Г.Ю., Моделирование компетентности в естественнонаучном образовании.

T.: TDPU, декабрь, 2021. 227-330 стр.

10. Юсупова Г. Ю., Шакадирова Н. И. Требование и цели стандартов обучения,

предъявляемые преподавателям информатики //Academic research in educational

sciences. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 1. – С. 110-122.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 2, May 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

808

11. Юсупова Г. Ю. Формирование и подготовка компетентности учителей информатики

с использованием ресурсов информационно-образовательной среды //Fizika

matematika va informatika. – 2021. – Т. 1. – №. 4. – С. 42-49.

12. Yusupova, G. (2024). Modeling competencies for future computer science teachers. The

USA Journals. Американский журнал междисциплинарных инноваций и исследований

международный

журнал

открытого

доступа.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume06Issue03-04

.

13. Yusupova G. MODELING THE COMPETENCIES OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

TEACHERS: KEY ASPECTS AND PROSPECTS //Science and innovation. – 2024. – Т. 3.

– №. B3. – С. 352-356.nformatiki-kontseptsiya-i-ee-realizatsiya (дата обращения:

12.01.2025).

Библиографические ссылки

European Commission. (2022). DigCompEdu: The European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators. Joint Research Centre. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcompedu

Selevko, G. K. (2006). Competence-based approach in education: Methodology and theory. Moscow: Research Institute of School Technologies.

Sergeev, L. G. (2021). Digital transformation of higher education: Pedagogical challenges and modeling competencies. Higher Education in Russia, 30(4), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-4-45-52

Slastenin, V. A., Isaev, I. F., & Mishchenko, A. I. (2002). Pedagogics. Moscow: School Press.

Tur, Y. N. (2019). Formation of modeling competence in future teachers of computer science. Pedagogical Education and Science, (3), 104–110.

Ministry of Higher Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Monitoring Report on the Digitalization of Higher Education Institutions. Tashkent.

Lerner, I. Y. (1981). Didactic bases of the teaching methods. Moscow: Pedagogika.

Юсупова Г.Ю., Роль моделирования в подготовке учителя информатики: концепция и ее реализация. Электронное научно-практическое периодическое издание «Экономика и социум», №2(93) 2022 Стр.1178-1182.

Юсупова Г.Ю., Моделирование компетентности в естественнонаучном образовании. T.: TDPU, декабрь, 2021. 227-330 стр.

Юсупова Г. Ю., Шакадирова Н. И. Требование и цели стандартов обучения, предъявляемые преподавателям информатики //Academic research in educational sciences. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 1. – С. 110-122.

Юсупова Г. Ю. Формирование и подготовка компетентности учителей информатики с использованием ресурсов информационно-образовательной среды //Fizika matematika va informatika. – 2021. – Т. 1. – №. 4. – С. 42-49.

Yusupova, G. (2024). Modeling competencies for future computer science teachers. The USA Journals. Американский журнал междисциплинарных инноваций и исследований — международный журнал открытого доступа. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume06Issue03-04.

Yusupova G. MODELING THE COMPETENCIES OF COMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS: KEY ASPECTS AND PROSPECTS //Science and innovation. – 2024. – Т. 3. – №. B3. – С. 352-356.nformatiki-kontseptsiya-i-ee-realizatsiya (дата обращения: 12.01.2025).