Авторы

  • Ibragimova Umida Yuldashevna,Botirova Malika Gaffarovna
    Superviser, PhD associate professor of Foreign Philology department ,Magister of the International Innovation University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijsr.68820

Ключевые слова:

scientific and technical translation special sublanguage typology of banking terms special purposes banking terms modern dictionaries are special vocabulary.

Аннотация

This article reveals  the theoretical view of banking terminology in linguistics and their translation into native language. It tries to identify the main differences between the term and the nomenclature unit as the main units of special vocabulary.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 10, issue 1, February 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

203

Ibragimova Umida Yuldashevna

Superviser, PhD associate professor

of Foreign Philology department

Botirova Malika Gaffarovna

Magister of the International Innovation University

THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE ON BANKING TERMINOLOGY IN ENGLISH IN

THE LANGUAGE SYSTEM

Annotation

:This article reveals the theoretical view of banking terminology in linguistics and

their translation into native language. It tries to identify the main differences between the term

and the nomenclature unit as the main units of special vocabulary.

Keywords:

scientific and technical translation, special sublanguage, typology of banking terms,

special purposes, banking terms, modern dictionaries are special vocabulary.

INTRODUCTION

Today, when a foreign language has turned from a specialty into a language for special purposes,

it is important to remember the following: language for special purposes (LSP) should provide

professional communicative competence of a specialist. Naturally, with such a “profiling”

approach, terminology plays a major role. Different researchers group and classify the means of

expression in the field of LSP in different ways: general scientific terms, interdisciplinary, highly

specialized, author’s, regional, universal, etc.

However, no one denies the fact that the key point in LSP training is the special

vocabulary of a particular field of knowledge, represented by terminology.

METHODOLOGY

Contemporary philology is also undergoing major changes in a rapidly changing world.

Now the attention of philologists is increasingly riveted to specialized texts: informational,

business, economic, legal, political, advertising, scientific and technical, etc. “There is no need to

prove that the audience of these texts (oral and written) is several times larger than the audience

of, for example, poetry and drama, so the change in the focus of philological science seems to be

at least justified”. Scientific and technical texts and, accordingly, scientific and technical

translation, which fully reflects the scale of the growth of scientific and technological progress,

are moving rather rapidly to the center of philological and linguistic research and are acquiring

priority importance.

The constantly growing interest in the translation of highly specialized literature testifies,

first of all, to the development of specialized branches of scientific knowledge and human

activity in narrow professional spheres and, consequently, to the increased role of the “language

for special purposes” itself, used by specialists in various fields. A.C. Gerd describes the nature

of the emergence of LSP in the following way: “As it develops, a separate special knowledge

looks for special means of expression, looks for its own special language. This is how a language

for expressing its special thoughts, goals, ideas and ideals arises - a language for special purposes

(LSP)” (Gerd, 2005, p. 27).


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 10, issue 1, February 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

204

In the course of its development, special knowledge sought a sign system, the language

of its expression. Here the following forms of the symbolic embodiment of scientific knowledge

should be distinguished:

1) the code itself, the language for recording the content of knowledge in the form of

symbols, words, phrases, sentences, etc.;

2) various types of texts expressing scientific knowledge in one language or another. In

the course of the development of a special sublanguage, the system of its concepts firmly enters

the system of the common language and becomes its direct element.

Scientific professional concepts are looking for their embodiment in words, phrases,

syntactic constructions; new words, designations, terms appear. “The content of knowledge

begins to penetrate the signs of the chosen language, saturate and fill them. New words and

terms are subject to the action of all mechanisms of the language system” (Gerd, 2005, p. 27).

Special knowledge, which has found its expression in a term, is included in the semantic

system of one or another special language, becoming an integral component of the lexical-

semantic system of the common language. As MV Marchuk notes, in the overwhelming majority

of cases, new words that arise in a particular natural language are terms that are a direct means of

expressing LSP and reflect new concepts of science, technology, politics, economics, and the

sphere of business communication. “The modern linguistic situation, characterized by the

informatization of society and the so-called “information explosion “, makes us pay special

attention to the growth and expansion of lexical meanings and the role of terms and terminology”

(Marchuk, 1996, p. 8).

The growing significance and development of scientific and technical knowledge today is

reflected in the fact that over 90% of new words appearing in modern dictionaries are special

vocabulary. It is also observed that the increase in the number of terms in various areas of special

knowledge exceeds the increase in the number of commonly used words of the language.

In the context of the extremely rapid development of science and technology, and with

this the increased role and importance of international business and scientific relations, the

problems of unification and standardization of terminology have become especially urgent in

recent decades.

One of the main ways of normative work on the standardization of terminology is the

compilation of terminological dictionaries. It is difficult to overestimate the role of educational

terminological dictionaries in the process of teaching specialists and students studying this

special language for professional purposes (LBR), as well as in the process of creating and

strengthening international scientific and professional relations. Despite a significant amount of

scientific terminological research in areas related to the banking sector, such as finance, business,

stock exchange, etc., the terminology of banking has not yet received detailed coverage from the

point of view of typological and functional features of this sublanguage.

Although there are works devoted to certain aspects of the functioning of the terms of this

system, a detailed and detailed study of this terminology from the point of view of typology for

the purpose of analysis. Its current state and the development of criteria for the compilation of an

educational terminological dictionary of banking is certainly necessary. It follows from the

foregoing that the relevance of this topic is due to insufficient knowledge of the English

terminology of banking, since the issue of studying the typological features of the terminology of

banking in the language system and its functioning in speech practice, in fact, has not received

due attention. The choice of the topic of this study also seems justified, since a deep study of the

selected terminological field will allow work to unify this terminology and, as a result of this

activity, develop criteria for the selection of terms for compiling an educational vocabulary-


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 10, issue 1, February 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

205

minimum of terms, focused on students and banking professionals. The development of criteria

for the selection of vocabulary is a difficult task for a terminologist, since it directly affects the

problem of normalizing terminology. Determination of universal criteria for the selection of

special vocabulary for compiling an educational banking terminological dictionary is a task that

is solved solely by identifying the most common and significant key terms of this terminology

system and highly specialized terminological units formed from them at the language and speech

levels. The development of criteria for the selection of terms for compiling an educational

terminological dictionary designed to unify the vocabulary of this terminology, and the analysis

of banking terminology terms based on these criteria, do not limit the entire scope of tasks. To

compile an educational terminological dictionary and, accordingly, to unify this special

vocabulary, a detailed analysis of the lexical composition of the studied terminology and the

definition of the layer of vocabulary that will be described in the future dictionary are required.

The aim of this study is a typology of banking terms; unification of banking terminology;

identification of the most common fundamental key terms of this terminology system, as well as

highly specialized banking terms derived from them for effective training of specialists in this

LER; compilation of an educational English-language dictionary minimum of banking terms.

In this regard, the main objectives of the study are:

- a thorough study of the state of banking terminology at the level of the language system

and analysis of the features of its functioning in real professional speech;

- typological analysis of banking terminology;

- development of universal criteria for the selection of special vocabulary for the

compilation of a miniterminological dictionary, aimed at students and banking professionals

studying English for special purposes;

- development of the basic lexicographic criteria for the designed dictionary; - defining

the boundaries of banking terminology by analyzing authoritative dictionaries and textbooks on

economics and banking and highlighting the main conceptual fields;

- highlighting the most frequent and significant basic, key terms, as well as highly

specialized banking terms derived from them, based on the analysis of these materials, taking

into account the genus-specific hierarchy within this terminology; - checking the relevance of the

theoretical conclusions obtained by professional speech using data from the English and Uzbek-

language corpora of banking texts;

- the choice of Uzbek-language equivalents of English terms (banking for compiling

dictionary entries of the projected minimum terminological dictionary based on a comparison of

two corpuses of professional texts;

- compilation of an educational terminological dictionaryminimum of banking.

A detailed typological analysis of banking terminology was carried out for the first time

on the basis of an extensive theoretical toolkit, i.e. the terminology of banking was considered

and studied in detail from the point of view of the theory of the term, the requirements for the

term, the main differences and similarities between the terminologies of the humanities and

socio-political sciences, on the one hand, and the terminologies of the exact and natural sciences,

on the other, were considered the material of the studied terminology; identified the main

differences between the term and the nomenclature unit as the main units of special vocabulary;

in addition, the processes of the emergence of the phenomenon of polysemy in the terminology

of banking are considered in detail and the criteria for distinguishing the phenomena of

polysemy and homonymy are highlighted on the material of the terminology of banking.

CONCLUSION


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 10, issue 1, February 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

206

The theoretical significance of the work lies in the development of a comparative study in the

field of terminology based on the terms of banking. The data obtained can contribute to further

study of the theory and practice of various LSPs. The theoretical significance of the work is

determined by the importance of researching this area of knowledge in modern conditions of

globalization in order to identify a complex system of organizing the terminology of banking.

Observing the actual functioning of terms in scientific discourse can contribute to the search for

new ways of linguistic analysis. The work can contribute to terminology, terminography,

comparative language learning.

REFERENCES:

1. Averbukh K.Ya. To the definition of the basic concepts of terminology // Theoretical

problems of scientific and technical terminology and principles of translation: Abstracts. Omsk,

1985, p. 3-4.

2. Problems of translation of scientific and technical literature: Sat. scientific. tr. Saratov: Saratov

University Press, 1988, p. 3-8.

3. Gerd A.S. Applied Linguistics), St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 2005, 268 p.

4. Erogova A.M. Theory and practice of translating economic texts from English into Russian.

M., 1974, 189 p.

5. Gero G. D. Lexical compatibility and types of translation correspondences // Translator’s

notebooks/ [6] O.D. Meshkov Word formation of modern English; M., 1976.

Библиографические ссылки

Averbukh K.Ya. To the definition of the basic concepts of terminology // Theoretical problems of scientific and technical terminology and principles of translation: Abstracts. Omsk, 1985, p. 3-4.

Problems of translation of scientific and technical literature: Sat. scientific. tr. Saratov: Saratov University Press, 1988, p. 3-8.

Gerd A.S. Applied Linguistics), St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 2005, 268 p.

Erogova A.M. Theory and practice of translating economic texts from English into Russian. M., 1974, 189 p.

Gero G. D. Lexical compatibility and types of translation correspondences // Translator’s notebooks/ [6] O.D. Meshkov Word formation of modern English; M., 1976.