INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 04 (2025)
155
METHODS OF DEVELOPING STUDENTS' SPEED SKILLS IN VOLLEYBALL CLUBS
OF COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOLS
Rakhmonov Rauf Rasulovich,
Associate Professor of the Department of Sports Activities, Bukhara State University, Ph.D. (PhD).,
Uzbekistan, Bukhara
rauf.raxmonov1122@gmail.сom
mob: +99890-715-11-22
https://orсid.org/0000-0003-2964—278X
Istamov Jo’rabek Oktam ugli,
Bukhara State University, 2nd stage Master
Uzbekistan, Bukhara
Annotation.
This artiсle examines the problems of developing agility in sсhoolсhildren and its
assessment in volleyball players, as well as important aspeсts of organizing physiсal eduсation
сlasses and extraсurriсular aсtivities to develop the physiсal qualities of senior sсhoolсhildren.
Keywords.
Volleyball, passes, reсeptions, bloсking, strength, speed, enduranсe, agility and
dexterity, running, speсial enduranсe,
“krossfit”,
"fir" running, training loads.
Annotasiya.
Mazkur maqolada maktab o‘quvсhilarining tezkorlik qobiliyatlarini rivojlantirish va
ularni voleybolсhilarda baholash muammolari, yuqori sinf o’quvсhilarining jismoniy sifatlarini
rivojlantirish maqsadida, jismoniy tarbiya darslari va sinfdan tashqarida o’tkaziladigan
mashg’ulotlarni tashkil qilishning ahamiyatli tomonlari yoritilgan.
Kalit so‘zlar.
Voleybol, to‘p uzatish, to‘pni qabul qilish, to‘siq qo‘yish, kuсh, tezkorlik, сhidamlilik,
сhaqqonlik va epсhillik, yugurish, maxsus сhidamlilik, “Arсhasimon” yugurish, “krossfit”,
mashg‘ulot yuklamalari.
Аннотация.
В данной статье
рассматриваются проблемы развития ловкости школьников и ее
оценки у волейболистов, а также важные аспекты организации занятий по физической
культуре и внеклассной работы по развитию физических качеств учащихся старших классов.
Ключевые слова.
Волейбол, передачи, приемы, блокирование, сила, скорость, выносливость,
ловкость и сноровка, бег, специальная выносливость, «еловый» бег, кроссфит,
тренировочные нагрузки.
The results of scientific research conducted on the training of highly qualified volleyball players at
the global level and their analysis are aimed at developing methods and tools for teaching and
improving technical and tactical methods, developing physical qualities, and forming
psychofunctional capabilities during multi-year training cycles. Although model indicators and
criteria for normative requirements have been created, such as tests for monitoring the rate of
formation of training types and assessing their use as targets in the process of training volleyball
players, the lack of scientifically based approaches to the development of agility based on aerobic-
anaerobic capabilities, and the lack of modern measuring equipment designed to objectively assess it,
create the need to develop innovative developments. The Head of our state has determined the need
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 04 (2025)
156
to “ensure the formation of a strong immune system against disease in every citizen through regular
physical education and mass sports and the formation of life skills for a healthy lifestyle, abandon
harmful habits, adhere to the principles of proper nutrition, systematically and effectively organize
recovery and rehabilitation work and mass physical activity events, and create appropriate
infrastructure and other necessary conditions in this regard” [1]. However, the club teams
participating in the national championships of our country, as well as the national teams selected
from them, are far from the international model-standard requirements in terms of professional
training and skills.
Just as agility skills need to be developed in a way that is specific to each sport, in volleyball it is of
paramount importance to develop these skills within the coordination content of movement in the
areas of the court and the technical and tactical methods used (passing the ball during quick
movements, receiving the ball, blocking, etc.). Most experts and scientists working in the field of
volleyball theory and methodology recommend using repetition, combined action, rotation, interval,
game and competition methods to develop agility skills in this sport. By using them: transferring the
ball to the necessary zone based on quick movement depending on the speed, direction and height of
the ball, or receiving the ball directed to the sides; performing attack strokes based on quick running
and landing along different zones; Individual, group or collective blocking techniques are taught
based on rapid movement through zones 2-3-4 and are formed in a rapid mode Y.D. Zheleznyak, [2.]
In the practice of training volleyball players, there are a number of officially introduced pedagogical
tests for assessing general and special agility, through their use, normative criteria have been
established for volleyball players of different ages and sports qualifications. In particular, according
to the information provided by L.P. Serginko, A.V. Ablikova, general agility in volleyball players of
different ages can be assessed using the 30 m. running test, and special agility can be assessed using
the “Arch-shaped” running test - 92 m., “6x5 m.” running tests. The results of these tests are
presented in Table 1. [3.]
Table 1
Normative
Requirements for Assessing Agility in Volleyball Players of Different Ages
№ Age of the subjects
30 m. seconds
“Arсhasimon”
92 m. seconds
“6x5 m.”
running seconds
1. 11-12
5,2-5,3
29,0-28,0
12,0-11,5
2. 13-14
6,1-6,0
27,0-26,5
10,5-10,2
3. 15-16
4,8-4,8
26,0-25,5
10,0-9,8
4. 17-18
4,6-4,5
24,2-23,4
8,4-9,2
The normative requirements for speed indicators presented by S.V. Garkusha are determined as
follows: in highly qualified volleyball players, the “Arkhasimon” running test is 24.65±1.81 seconds
for 4x9 m., 8.93+0.29 seconds for 30 m., and 8.01±0.29 seconds for 30 m. [4.]
According to the data of T.K. Komarova and S.V. Legonkov, the speed indicators of volleyball
players who studied at a higher educational institution specializing in physical education and sports
and practiced volleyball are 4.7-4.8 seconds for 30 m., and 8.4-8.3 seconds for “5x6 m.” [5.]
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 04 (2025)
157
In the data provided by A.A. Pulatov, the result of the 30 m. run for boys in the initial preparatory
group should be 5.5-5.1 seconds, in the training group 5.0-4.0 seconds, in the sports improvement
group
4.6-4.4 seconds, in the group for improving sports skills 4.3 and less seconds. [11,12,13,14.]
The result of the “5x6 m.” run is given for the initial group and is 12.0-11.0 seconds. “Arch-shaped”
run for 92 m. -28.0-29.0 seconds; 27.0-26.0.; 24.5-24.3 seconds.; 24.0-23.5 seconds.
Girls: 30 m. running 5.9-5.7 seconds. 5.6-5.4 seconds.; 5.5-5.3 seconds.
“Arch-like” running should be equal to 30.0-29.0 s.; 28.0-26.2 s.; 26.0-25.7 s.; 25.2-25.0 s.
According to B.E. Lisin, in assessing the quality of speed, reflecting anaerobic performance in
qualified volleyball students, it is important to use the “Arch-like” running test in them, as well as
the 1000 m. running test. In the author’s opinion, “Arch-like” running – 92 m. time in volleyball
students can be evaluated in the following differentiated manner: 25.6 s.-satisfactory or poor; 25.2
s.-below average; 24.1 s. - average; 23.7 s. - above average; 23.6 s. - high. The time for running
1000 m. is: 5.03 minutes - slow; 4.18 d. - below average; 3.23 d. - average; 3.08 d. - above average;
3.08 minutes short high. [6.]
V.V. Kostyukov M.M. Shestakov's studies used the tests of speed ability and speed endurance in the
30 m. run and the "Arch-shaped" run-92 m., which in volleyball players aged 13-14 should be
5.2±0.2-5.7±0.3 s. and 28.1±0.03-31.2±0.03 s., respectively. [8.]
According to a number of experts, the speed of running “arch-like” 92 m. in 17-18-year-old
qualified volleyball players should be on average 26, 04-24, 96 s.
E.Lmojayev., A.P.Grigoryev., E.R.Zalyalova emphasize that the regular use of “Crossfit” exercises
(training muscles, respiratory and cardiovascular activity) in such volleyball players’ trainings
allows not only to purposefully develop physical qualities,
but also to ensure the long-term preservation of the results of all relevant tests. [9.].
A. Abdullayev, based on his research, put forward the idea that technical-tactical actions performed
against the opponent's tactics in competitive games in rapidly changing situations require, on the one
hand, the need to predict (predict) the opponent's plan in the short term, and on the other hand, the
need to implement one's actions at a convenient time. Therefore, it can be argued that achieving high
game efficiency in today's volleyball primarily depends on the player's speed of movement along
changing directions and the effective implementation of technical-tactical methods. [7, 10.]
According to O.Y. Fedoseyeva, R.S. Zhukov, in order to ensure the effectiveness of technical-
tactical actions performed in modern volleyball, it is advisable to emphasize the systematic
formation of speed-strength and coordination abilities in training, and to periodically evaluate them.
The results of tests designed to assess such abilities in 16-18-year-old volleyball players show that:
“Arch-like” running length - 24.4 s.; Throwing a stuffed ball - 7.5 m; Bending and writing them
while lying on your hands - 30.9 times; Long jump from a standing position - not less than 257.7 cm.
Thus, based on the comparative analysis of the scientific and methodological data discussed above
and the opinions recognized by expert scientists, it can be noted that in sports games, including
volleyball practice, the possibilities of effectively forming technical and tactical methods and
increasing their effectiveness primarily depend on agility, or rather agility-strength qualities, based
on aerobic-anaerobic endurance. In order to educate them in a specialized direction and correctly
select exercises, it is advisable to assess the growth rates of these qualities using objective
information-providing methods or appropriate pedagogical tests.
In modern sports games, and in particular in today's volleyball practice, the purposeful organization
of many years of sports training, the effectiveness of technical and tactical methods and the
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 04 (2025)
158
effectiveness of competitions, along with all general physical qualities, it is advisable to use speed
components, especially exercises suitable for sharply changing directions. When educating the
speed of movement-running along changing directions, it is important to pay attention to its
structural components (simple and complex reaction, number and time of repetition of movement,
reactions to observing and selecting an object) and to form them in a differentiated manner and on
an integral basis.
REFERENCES:
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining
2015-yil
4-entabrda O‘RQ-394-son“Jismoniy tarbiya
va sport to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni.
2. Железняк, Ю.Д. Волейбол в школе [Текст] / Ю.Д. Железняк. −М: Просвещение,
2016. – 180 с.
3. Рязанов
А.А., Богданов
М.Ю. Развитие скоростно-силовых способностей
волейболистов // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки.
Тамбов, 2019. Т. 24, № 178. С. 53-59.
4. Горкуша С.В. Биомеханична коррекция швидкисно силовой пидготовленности
волейболистов високои квалификации у передзмагальний период: Автореф. дисс. канд.
наук з. физичного виховання спорту: 24.00.01, Олимпийсвский и професийний спорт
/Харкив: ХДАФК, 2005. – С. 105 с.
5. Комарова Т.К., Легоньков С.В. Динамика показателей физической подгатовленности
студентов педогогических вузов. Занимающихся волейболом /В сб. матер. конф.
“спортивные игры в физическом
воспитании, рекреации и спорте, Смоленск, 2015, - С. 72-75.
6. Лосин Б.Е., Иванова Г.П., Биленко А.Г., Григорьева Д.В., Бородин А.В. Оценка
прыгучести баскетболистов по временной структуре непрерывных прыжков, Ученые
записки университета им. П.Ф.
Лесгафта. -2021. - № 1 (191). - С. 196-201.
7. Умматов. А.А. 15-16 ёшли волейболчиларнинг куч сифатини анъанавий
машқлар ёрдамида ошириш услубияти, - Фан-Спортга, 2021 С. 55-58.
8. Костюков В.В., Шестаков М.М. Оптимизация процесса подготовки в
спортивных играх: Учеб. пособие. – Краснодар, 1991. -159 с.
9. Можаев Э.Л., Григорьев А.П., Залялова Э.Р., Шершунова В.Н., Бухтоярова Л.В.,
Фомина Е.В. Особенности применения игровой деятельности в совершенствовании
тактической подготовки волейболистов
18-19
лет
(на
примере
студенческих
команд) //Образование и право. 2020. № 1. С. 281-289.
10. Abdullayev A. Jismoniy tarbiya nazariyasi va usuliyati: Jismoniy tarbiya instituti va
oliy ta’lim muassasalari jismoniy tarbiya fakultetlari uсhun darslik. – T., 2005. - 232 b.
11. Pulatov A.A. Voleybol o‘qitish metodikasi [O‘quv qo‘llanma] Сhirсhiq
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 04 (2025)
159
O‘zDJTSU, 2023. 215 b.
12. Rasuloviсh R. R. Сontent of running loads and used faсilities of medium distanсe runners in
annual preparation stage //Web of Sсientist: International Sсientifiс Researсh Journal. – 2022. – Т.
3. – №. 02. – С. 1070-1077.
13Rasuloviсh R. R. Effeсtiveness of improving the teсhniсal and taсtiсal movements of middle-
distanсe runners //E-Сonferenсe Globe. – 2021. – С. 309-314.
14.Рахмонов, Рауф Расулович. "Состав беговых нагрузок и используемых средств бегунов
на средние дистанции на этапе годовой подготовки."
IQRO INDEXING
10.2 (2024): 135-139.
