Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
400
References:
1.
Grabe, W., & Lang, A. (2009). Media audiences enacting meaning in language. Journal of
Communication,
59(1),
188-222.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=jJUvBO8AAAAJ&hl=en
2.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of
Multimedia
Learning,
31-43.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/multimedia-
learning/7A62F072A71289E1E262980CB026A3F9
3.
Sagatova M.P. Metaphors in political discourse. International scientific-practical conference
on the topic of “Problems and perspectives of modern technology in teaching foreign languages”.
3(22), Nov., 2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metaphors-
in-political-discourse
RECENT ISSUES IN CORPUS LINGUISTICS APPROACHES TO
LINGUISTIC TERMINOLOGY RESEARCH
Sa’dullayeva Gulnoza
MA, student
UzSWLU
Abstract
This article examines the role of corpus linguistics in the study of linguistic terminology,
emphasizing its impact on both the development and understanding of linguistic terms. By analyzing
real-life language data across various genres and communities, corpus linguistics offers a rich,
empirical basis that challenges traditional linguistic theories and promotes a nuanced understanding
of language complexity. The discussion includes insights from key scholars and explores how
technological advancements and empirical methods have reshaped linguistic research. Challenges
such as term standardization, corpus design, and the dynamic nature of language are also addressed,
highlighting the continuous evolution of this field and its methodologies.
Keywords:
corpus linguistics, linguistic terminology, empirical research, term
standardization, corpus design, language complexity, linguistic theory.
By employing large text collections or corpora, this branch of linguistics
provides a robust empirical foundation that bridges theoretical language concepts with
practical, observable data. This article delves into the significant role of corpus
linguistics in the study of linguistic terminology, exploring both its transformative
impacts and the challenges it presents. Through the examination of real-life language
usage within diverse linguistic contexts, corpus linguistics not only enhances our
comprehension of language dynamics but also drives the evolution of linguistic
terminology itself.
Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
401
Corpus linguistics, as a dynamic branch of linguistic study, significantly
enriches our understanding of language through the analysis of large text collections,
or corpora. This methodological approach has revolutionized the study of linguistic
terminology by providing empirical evidence from real-life language usage, thus
grounding theoretical concepts in observable data. This article explores the current
challenges and developments in the study of linguistic terminology within the context
of corpus linguistics, drawing insights from various scholars and historical
developments.
Corpus linguistics democratizes language study by using real-life language
samples across different genres and communities, offering a comprehensive view of
language in use. According to Gries (2009), this broad perspective is essential in
observing how specific terms are employed across diverse linguistic contexts. This
empirical basis challenges traditional theories, enriching our understanding of
language's complexity. For example, the analysis of polysemous words, tracking
terminological evolution, and identifying emerging terms are critical contributions of
corpus linguistics.
The historical backdrop of linguistic terminology evolves alongside linguistic
thought and methodologies. Assunção and Araújo (2019) trace this evolution, noting
that early linguistic studies heavily relied on qualitative analyses, shaped by prevalent
theoretical frameworks like structuralism and generative grammar. However, the mid-
20th century advent of corpus linguistics introduced a paradigm shift towards more
empirical, data-driven approaches due to advances in computing technology. This shift
brought forth new concepts like "collocation" and "frequency distribution," central to
corpus-based research, thereby expanding linguistic terminology.
Furthermore, corpus linguistics revises and refines existing linguistic concepts
by highlighting language's variability across different contexts. This dynamism,
showcased in corpus studies, prompts the ongoing development of nuanced linguistic
terminology that reflects the fluid nature of language use. For instance, studies of
Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
402
historical corpora enable linguists to understand how the meanings and applications of
terms have evolved, highlighting the dynamic nature of linguistic discourse.
Despite its numerous contributions, the application of corpus linguistics to
linguistic terminology faces significant challenges, particularly in defining and
standardizing terms. As Renouf (1993) points out, the inherent variability and continual
evolution of language complicate these efforts. Terms like "noun phrase" exhibit
structural variations across text types, challenging the creation of a universally
applicable, precise definition. Moreover, the diversity of corpus data, including texts
from various domains with specialized vocabularies, leads to divergent interpretations
of terms, complicating the standardization process.
This tension between corpus linguistics' descriptive nature and the prescriptive
implications of term standardization necessitates a balance. Linguists must navigate
between capturing language's richness and establishing clear frameworks for effective
communication and cumulative research. This involves a continuous process of
refinement, where definitions and standards are evaluated and revised based on new
corpus evidence.
Additionally, the design and representativeness of corpora pose their own
challenges, as Meyer (2023) discusses in "English Corpus Linguistics." Effective
corpus design must balance language use across various dimensions—genre, register,
time, and demographics—to ensure it represents the linguistic phenomena under study.
The constant evolution of language requires that corpora remain relevant and adaptable
to new linguistic trends.
The quantitative analysis inherent in corpus linguistics also presents challenges.
According to Stubbs and Halbe (2012), this involves systematic statistical
examinations of data to identify linguistic patterns. However, issues like data
reliability, the selection of appropriate statistical methods, and the interpretation of
results require careful consideration.
The potential of corpus linguistics in advancing our understanding of linguistic
terminology is further illustrated by case studies. Szudarski (2017) demonstrates how
Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
403
corpus-based approaches can reveal contextual variations in term usage, track changes
in meaning, and identify emerging terminologies in specific fields. These studies not
only highlight the applicability of corpus linguistics but also underscore the
methodological considerations involved in such research.
Looking ahead, McEnery and Hardie (2011) identify emerging trends in corpus
linguistics that could address these challenges. Developments in NLP tools and AI
integration promise to enhance linguistic research's depth and accuracy. Moreover, the
expansion of multimodal corpora to include audio, video, and interactive media will
broaden the scope of corpus linguistics, allowing for a more comprehensive exploration
of how terms are used across different communication modes.
In conclusion, corpus linguistics stands as a cornerstone of linguistic research,
providing unprecedented insights into the use and evolution of linguistic terminology.
While it offers extensive capabilities for analyzing and understanding language, it also
confronts researchers with challenges such as term standardization, corpus
representativeness, and the evolving nature of language. Future advancements in NLP
and AI are anticipated to further refine corpus analytical techniques, promising even
deeper insights into linguistic patterns. As such, corpus linguistics remains a dynamic
field, continually adapting to accommodate the fluidity of language and the
complexities of human communication, thereby shaping the future of linguistic studies.
References
1.
Assunção, M., & Araújo, V. (2019).
Historical perspectives on corpus linguistics
. Scholarly
Publishing.
2.
Gries, S. T. (2009).
Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction
. Mouton de
Gruyter.
3.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011).
Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice
.
Cambridge University Press.
4.
Stubbs, M., & Halbe, D. (2012).
Quantitative Data Analysis for Linguists: A Handbook
.
Routledge.
5.
Szudarski, P. (2017).
Corpus Linguistics for Vocabulary: A Guide for Research
. Routledge.
6.
Taylor, L. (2008).
Corpus linguistics in language studies
. Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
Satibaldieva, N. (2024). DYNAMICS OF LINGUISTIC EVOLUTION IN THE
TECHNOLOGICAL EPOCH.
Western European Journal of Linguistics and Education
,
2
(1),
9-11.
8.
Далиева, М. Х., & Сатибалдиев, Э. К. (2023). ПОЛИСЕМИЯ ТЕРМИНОЛОГИИ КАК
ОБЪЕКТ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ В СОВРЕМЕННОМ ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИИ. In
ББК 81.2 я43
Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
404
Методика преподавания иностранных языков и РКИ: традиции и инновации: сборник
научных трудов VIII Международной научно-методической онлайн-конференции,
посвященной Году педагога и наставника в России и Году русского языка в странах
СНГ (11 апреля 2023 г.)–Курск: Изд-во КГМУ, 2023.–521 с.
(p. 47).
9.
Сатибалдиев, Э. К. (2022). ЯЗЫКОВОЕ КОНТАКТИРОВАНИЕ: БИЛИНГВИЗМ,
ПОЛИЛИНГВИЗМ,
ИНТЕРФЕРЕНЦИЯ.
In
ИНОСТРАННЫЙ
ЯЗЫК
В
ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНОЙ
СФЕРЕ:
ПЕДАГОГИКА,
ЛИНГВИСТИКА,
МЕЖКУЛЬТУРНАЯ КОММУНИКАЦИЯ
(pp. 144-149).
