Authors

  • Javohir Giyozov
    Researcher, Tashkent State Pedagogical University named after Nizami, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.jsshrf.88807

Keywords:

Geoecology arra method soil

Abstract

This article involves the teaching of the topic of soil salinization, erosion and measures to combat it, which is included in the series of geoecological topics, using the “Saw” method of collaborative teaching, and reveals the features of this method aimed at improving the quality of education.


background image

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals

17

https://eipublication.com/index.php/jsshrf

TYPE

Original Research

PAGE NO.

17-20

DOI

10.55640/jsshrf-05-05-05



OPEN ACCESS

SUBMITED

13 March 2025

ACCEPTED

09 April 2025

PUBLISHED

11 May 2025

VOLUME

Vol.05 Issue05 2025

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.

Organizing the Topic Of

“Soil Salinization, Erosion

and Measures to Combat

It”, Which Is Considered

a

Geoecological Problem,

Using The “Saw” Method

of Cooperative Learning

Javohir Giyozov

Researcher, Tashkent State Pedagogical University named after Nizami,
Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Abstract:

This article involves the teaching of the topic

of soil salinization, erosion and measures to combat it,
which is included in the series of geoecological topics,

using the “Saw” method of collaborative teaching, and

reveals the features of this method aimed at improving
the quality of education.

Keywords:

Geoecology, arra method, soil, salinization,

erosion, module, assignment.

Introduction:

It is known that organizing topics based on

new innovative technologies helps to improve the

quality of education. The use of the “Saw” method in

pedagogical practice is of great importance. is called. In
this method, small groups consist of 6-8 students.
During the lesson, the topic to be studied is divided into
logically completed parts (blocks or modules). For each
part, educational tasks are created that students must
complete. Each group of students completes one of

these tasks and becomes an “expert” in this part. Then

the groups are reorganized. Each part (block or module)

in these groups must have an “expert”, these “experts”

explain the knowledge they have acquired to their

companions in turn, just like the teeth of a “saw” come

one after another. In these groups, the educational
material is reworked in a logical sequence [4; - p. 223].

It should be noted that in this lesson, students are
di

vided into two groups. The first group is the “expert”

training group. Since the training material on this topic


background image

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals

18

https://eipublication.com/index.php/jsshrf

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals

consists of four logically completed thought-provoking
parts, the 25 students participating in the lesson, say,

are divided into four equal “expert” groups of 8

students before the lesson begins, using 4 different
colored cards. They complete their respective training

tasks and become “experts” on this part.

The second group is the “experts” meeting group. Each

of the colored cards has numbers from 1 to 8 written
on the back, and the sum of the numbers on all the
colored cards must equal the number of students in
the practical room.

The “Experts” meeting is organized into 8 groups based

on the numbers on the back of the cards, each group
consisting of 4 students with the same number of cards
in 4 different colors. It is important to note that each
section (block or module) in these groups must have an

“expert”.

At this meeting, the “experts” take turns explaining the

knowledge they have acquired to their fellow students,

just like the teeth of a “saw” come one after another.

In these groups, 4 parts of the educational material are
reworked in a logical sequence. Then, the tasks
compiled on the educational material are brought into
a whole, and a question-and-answer session and
discussion are held between the groups. Students try
to observe and write down the necessary information
in a notebook, realizing that the only way to thoroughly
acquire knowledge is to listen carefully to the
information of their partner. Here, the teacher acts
only as an organizer, organizing the independent work
of students. At the end of the lesson, the teacher
determines the level of knowledge of students using
test tasks. The growth in the quality of knowledge of
each student is taken into account[4; - p. 223].

This “saw” method was partially modified by Professor
R. Savin and called it “saw

-

2”. The “saw

-

2” method has

now become a small group of 4-5 students. All
members work on a single task based on the
educational material. Within the group, students
divide the tasks into parts and take turns. Each student,

having mastered his or her part, becomes an “expert”.
At the end of the session, the “experts” from each

small group meet in the reorganized small groups.

Students’ k

nowledge is monitored and assessed

individually using test questions. The scores of the
group members are summed up, and the group with
the highest score is declared the winner.

Thus, group members simultaneously perform two
tasks:

1. Academic task - to achieve the goal set by the
educational tasks through knowledge and creative
research;

2. Socio-psychological task - to have a high culture of
communication during the lesson, to maintain good
morals. The student monitors the high level of
completion of both tasks.

In general, collaborative learning methods have the
following five characteristics:

1. Students work together on a common task or learning
activity, which is best learned through group work.

2. Students work together in small groups of 2-5
members.

3. Students follow socially accepted behavioral criteria
developed by the group to achieve a common task or to
carry out a learning activity.

4. Students are positive and independent. The
organization of work on a common task or learning
activity is designed to take into account the need for
students to help each other.

5. Students are personally responsible and accountable
for the results of their work, or in other words, for
studying, learning [1; - pp.964-971].

Theoretical bases and methodology

. Subject of

training: Soil salinization, erosion and countermeasures.

Biodiversity, climate change, the sustainable use of
natural

resources,

health,

cultural

heritage,

multiculturalism, and global welfare are important
contents in the planning of a sustainable future. The

effects of students’ own behavior should be discussed

and sustainable actions practiced in local surroundings.
An important goal is to learn negotiation, problem
solving and decision-making skills through discussions
about ecological, social, economic, and ethical
principles concerning local and Educ. Sci. 2017, 7, 1 4 of
19 global responsibility in their own life. Through
memorable, experiential, and active processes,
students learn to discuss their own value selection and
to evaluate phenomena and sources of information

critically. According to the World Bank [5; p.1.], “[t]he

achievement of sustained and equitable development

remains the greatest challenge facing the human race.”

Recently,

the

sustainable

development

goals

represented a focus on the role of education in
achieving a more humane world [6; -pp. 594

601.]:

“education

for

sustainable

development

and

sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality,
promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence,
global citizenship, and appreciation of cultural diversity

and

of

culture’s

contribution

to

sustainable

development.” This requires an ecological or

participatory worldview [2; -pp. 1

14.]. It is important

to understand the interlinkages between the three
pillars of sustainable development (economic growth,
social development, and environmental protection) and


background image

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals

19

https://eipublication.com/index.php/jsshrf

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals

the consequences of human choices. It means that

people’s ways of thinking should change toward more

holistic, systemic and integrative modes [3; -pp. 43

62.].

There are various names for the zigzag technique:
Boomerang, Snake's Footprint, Openwork Saw, Fine
Saw, 6x6x6, 7x7. We will create a training plan using

the “Saw” method.

Educational goal of the lesson: To familiarize students
with the causes of soil erosion and factors leading to
erosion, modern methods of stabilizing the humus
layer in the soil, i.e. humus.

Educational goal of the lesson: To broaden the
scientific outlook of students by familiarizing them
with wind erosion, water erosion and anthropogenic
types of erosion, soil pollution with pesticides,
measures to restore the humus layer in the soil, to
form a positive attitude towards soil ecology, and to
provide environmental education and upbringing.

The developmental goal of the lesson: To increase
students' knowledge about soil salinization, erosion,
and soil contamination by pesticides in the territory of
living Uzbekistan, to develop skills in independent
work on the textbook.

Preparation of visual materials during the lesson: Soil
map, videos on soil salinization and erosion, visual aids
with factors causing soil degradation.

Technology used during the session: collaborative

learning technology (“saw” method).

Course of the lesson:

I. Organizational part

II. Control and evaluation of the knowledge acquired
by students on the previous assignment.

III. Introducing students to the topic, purpose, and
course of the lesson and directing their activities to the
fulfillment of educational tasks.

IV. Studying a new assignment

a) achieving high-quality fulfillment of educational

tasks set by “experts”.

V. Organizing a question-and-answer session, an
educational debate between teams on the new
assignment.

VI. Control and evaluation of students' knowledge
using test questions.

VII. Processing and finalizing the new assignment.

VIII. Assigning homework.

So, there are several benefits to collaborative learning:

-

Having a network of experience/expertise

from other agencies that you can tap into.

-

Gaining exposure to other agencies and their

policies and procedures.

-

Building trust as you are exposed to others and

others are exposed to you.

-

Improving lines of communication as a result of

information sharing.

-

Garnering creative resource sharing/borrowing

opportunities (especially when filling critical vacancies).

-

Increasing knowledge management.

-

Building relationships.

-

What’s required of you

-

Start with a plan. Identify the skills needed for

your desired leadership position (director, chief,
executive, etc.).

Research appropriate agencies, ones that interest you
and will help you to develop resume enhancing skills,
executive core qualifications (ECQs), and leadership
competencies.

-

Draft your leadership development plan and

have people in your inner circle critique it prior to
sharing with your immediate leadership.

-

Incorporate detail/miscellaneous assignments

and volunteer for cross-functional workgroups and
teams.

-

Be your own cheerleader, promoting your

cross-functional/interagency skillset whenever and
wherever possible.

-

Be visible.

-

Develop your “brand” —

what you want to be

known for.

-

Prepare your resumes/ECQ narratives for up to

five positions.

-

Monitor, adjust, revise, revamp.

Most importantly, volunteer for assignments that
expose you to leaders with whom you should network
and seek mentorship [7].

CONCLUSION

In this technology, when determining the quality of

students’ mastery of knowledge, they are not compared

with each other, but the daily result of each student is
compared with the previously achieved result. Only
then, realizing that the result achieved during the
training will benefit the team, students will feel
responsible and strive to study more, master
knowledge, skills and competencies thoroughly.

REFERENCES

Rasulova, Z.D. Organization of the educational process
based on collaborative technology. Scientific progress.
Vol.2, -Pp.964-971


background image

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals

20

https://eipublication.com/index.php/jsshrf

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals

Reason, P.; Bradbury, H. Introduction: Inquiry and
participation in a search of a world worthy of human
aspiration. In Handbook of Action Research

Participative Practice and Enquiry; Reason, P.,
Bradbury, H., Eds.; SAGE: London, UK, 2001; pp. 1

14.

Sterling, S. An analysis of the development of
sustainability education internationally: Evolution,
interpretation and transformative potential. In The
Sustainability Curriculum

Facing the Challenge in

Higher Education; Blewitt, J., Cullingford, C., Eds.;
Earthscan: London, UK, 2004; pp. 43

62.

Sulliyeva, S.X., Zokirov, Q.G. Biologiya o’qit

ish

metodikasi. O’quv qo’llanma.

- Toshkent : Complex

Print, 2020. - 223 b

The World Bank. World Development Report 1992:
Development and the Environment; Oxford University
Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992; p. 1.

Wyn, J.; Cahill, H.; Holdsworth, L.; Rowling, L.; Carson,
S. MindMatters, a whole school approach promoting
mental health and wellbeing. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry
2000, 34, 594

601. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

https://www.govloop.com/community/blog/zig-zag-
interagency-collaboration

References

Rasulova, Z.D. Organization of the educational process based on collaborative technology. Scientific progress. Vol.2, -Pp.964-971

Reason, P.; Bradbury, H. Introduction: Inquiry and participation in a search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In Handbook of Action Research—Participative Practice and Enquiry; Reason, P., Bradbury, H., Eds.; SAGE: London, UK, 2001; pp. 1–14.

Sterling, S. An analysis of the development of sustainability education internationally: Evolution, interpretation and transformative potential. In The Sustainability Curriculum—Facing the Challenge in Higher Education; Blewitt, J., Cullingford, C., Eds.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2004; pp. 43–62.

Sulliyeva, S.X., Zokirov, Q.G. Biologiya o’qitish metodikasi. O’quv qo’llanma. - Toshkent : Complex Print, 2020. - 223 b

The World Bank. World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992; p. 1.

Wyn, J.; Cahill, H.; Holdsworth, L.; Rowling, L.; Carson, S. MindMatters, a whole school approach promoting mental health and wellbeing. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2000, 34, 594–601. [CrossRef] [PubMed]