Authors

  • Soliyev Oybek Alijon o’g’li
  • To’lanov Azizbek Jaloliddin o’g’li
  • G’ulomjonova Rayhona G’ayratjon qizi

Author Biographies

  • Soliyev Oybek Alijon o’g’li

    Teacher at Polytechnic N . 1, Asaka district

  • To’lanov Azizbek Jaloliddin o’g’li

    Teacher at Polytechnic N . 1, Asaka district

  • G’ulomjonova Rayhona G’ayratjon qizi

    Teacher at Polytechnic N . 1, Asaka district

     

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.mead.116713

Keywords:

formative assessment test summative assessment motivate.

Abstract

In this article, an emphasis has been put on defining formative assessment and elaborate readers’ understanding of the term. The author highlights the central role of formative assessment to motivate language learners in the teaching and learning process. There is a comparison of formative and summative assessment with a clear example of personal experience. The writer explains how teachers in two distinct cultures approaches to student learning.

 


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-27

Часть–3_Июнь –2025

373

ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING: DEFINITION, PURPOSE,

DISTINCTIVE FEATURES

Soliyev Oybek Alijon o’g’li

To’lanov Azizbek Jaloliddin o’g’li

G’ulomjonova Rayhona G’ayratjon qizi

Teacher at Polytechnic N . 1, Asaka district

Annotation: In this article, an emphasis has been put on defining formative

assessment and elaborate readers’ understanding of the term. The author highlights

the central role of formative assessment to motivate language learners in the teaching

and learning process. There is a comparison of formative and summative assessment

with a clear example of personal experience. The writer explains how teachers in two

distinct cultures approaches to student learning.

Key words: formative assessment, test, summative assessment, motivate.

ОЦЕНКА ДЛЯ ОБУЧЕНИЯ: ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ, ЦЕЛЬ,

ОТЛИЧИТЕЛЬНЫЕ ЧЕРТЫ

Аннотация: В этой статье акцент сделан на определении

формативной оценки и понимании термина читателями. Автор подчеркивает

центральную роль формативной оценки в мотивации изучающих язык в

процессе преподавания и обучения. Проводится сравнение формативной и

итоговой оценки с наглядным примером личного опыта. Автор объясняет, как

учителя в двух различных культурах подходят к обучению студентов.

Ключевые слова: формативная оценка, тест, итоговая оценка,

мотивировать.

Introduction. In recent years, a great emphasis on language assessment has

been the main focus of language teachers. Reasonably, it has been a primary issue for


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-27

Часть–3_Июнь –2025

374

decades since its role in the teaching and learning process is central. When assessment

is not properly utilized, this can lead to several issues like poor student participation,

reduction in student overall performance. There is a strong relationship between

assessment and teaching because each depends on another. Teachers’ lack of

assessment skills may cause little or no connection between assessment and teaching

(Malone, 2011). We believe that language teachers need to take assessment training

or participate in language assessment conferences so that they understand how

teaching and learning can be made easier with the help of assessment.

Formative assessment is an ongoing data gathering process in which

information will be predominantly used by teachers to make decisions on students’

performance. It is usually associated with diagnostic assessment in which teachers

learn about language learners’ weaknesses and strengths. The term formative

assessment in Uzbek can be translated as doimiy baholash or joriy nazorat.

Personal experience. During doimiy baholash, we mean students are assessed

for learning where marking is not primary focus though students are given relatively

one tenth of total point for their work. For example, K.Akhmadjonov (2017) taught a

problem-solution essay in the classroom and assigned students to do writing tasks at

home. The following tasks were accomplished in the classroom and beyondit: First

students were taught to structure essay, introduction, div paragraphs and conclusion.

Many practical exercises were accomplished to understand aspects (thesis statement,

topic sentences, supporting sentences, etc.) of essay. Then, students applied the

knowledge to construct their own essay at home. The next lesson, students brought

essays to classroom to do peer editing. All students were involved in peerediting

activity. To do this, they were provided with an analytic rubric, which contained

assessment criteria that aligned with lesson objectives. The rubric helped students

understand their weaknesses and strengths and they could also give constructive

feedback to their peers in order to improve their writing. The teacher assessed students

formatively for all they had done in the classroom and at home and for this, they were

marked with a minimum grade compared to summative grade whichaccounts for

maximum grading.Comparison of formative and summative assessment. In


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-27

Часть–3_Июнь –2025

375

comparison with summative assessment, formative assessment is considered a low-

stake measurement of student achievement because students are moreencouraged to

learn and be activethroughout the teaching and learning process. Summative

assessment, on the other hand, is high stake test as the results taken will be necessary

for different stakeholders such as administrators, teachers, parents and government.

Administrators need results from final examinations in order to evaluate teaching

process, students’ achievements and they compare statistics with previous years.

Parents are eager to know about their children’s achievements and progress aswell.

Interestingly, students also need results to understand their weaknesses so that they

can work more on themselves. Mostly importantly, government usually compare

students among schools, universities and in this way, they can make further decision

on teaching, teachers, curriculum and policy.

Testing. Traditionally, testing or a test was considered the only assessment

tool and in some teaching contexts, unfortunately, it is the only assessment tool. Many

test developers struggle to construct reliable and valid tests. Tests used to function as

information tools that teachers used to learn about students’ achievements,

weaknesses and strengths. However, later emphasis moved from testing to alternative

assessment tools such as student portfolios, web-based testing (Frank, 2012),

checklist, rubrics and others. Proper selection of assessment tools will definitely assist

teachers to match students needs and learning strategies. In fact, students vary from

being extrovert, introvert to auditory, visual, kinesthetic learners. For auditory

learners, for instance, it may work listening tests, visual learners may find tests

withsome pictures. Fengying (2003) points out that among other factors, modification

of assessment methods will motivate students.

Conclusion. To sum it up, assessment matters much in teaching and learning

environment, since their alignment bring outcomes. The other way around, may result

in issues such as student demotivation, inappropriate assessment strategies, and

overall poor student performance. Formative assessment will definitely help teachers

to establish their teaching environment in the way they wish to have and studentswill

benefit from learning and being in the classroom. Thus, teachers should try to learn


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-27

Часть–3_Июнь –2025

376

assessment skills, apply their knowledge in selecting best alternative assessment tools

and this is likely to lead to perfections in teaching and learning.

REFERENCES:

1. Akhmadjonov , K. A. (2023). Students’ performance in russian and uzbek-

language instruction classes. Educational Research in Universal Sciences, 2(16

SPECIAL), 435–437. Retrieved from http://erus.uz/index.php/er/article/view/5003

2. Akhmadjonov K. (2017). Critical evaluation and assessment of the written task

and assessment literacy. O‘zbekistonda xorijiy tillar. pp. 97 -103.

3. Malone E.M. (2011). Assessment literacy for language educators. CALdigest,

pp.12.

4. Frank J. (2012). The roles of assessment in language teaching. English Teaching

Forum, 3, p. 32.

5. Fengying M. (2003). Motivating students by modifying evaluation methods.

English Teaching Forum, pp. 38

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Soliyev Oybek Alijon o’g’li, To’lanov Azizbek Jaloliddin o’g’li, G’ulomjonova Rayhona G’ayratjon qizi, ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING: DEFINITION, PURPOSE, DISTINCTIVE FEATURES , Modern education and development: Vol. 27 No. 3 (2025)