Authors

  • Kholiev Bakhodir Oltibayevich

Author Biography

  • Kholiev Bakhodir Oltibayevich

    Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina, Uzbekistan, Bukhara, A. Navoi St. 1 Phone number: +998 (65) 223-00-50 e-mail: xoliyev.baxodir@bsmi.uz

     

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.mead.118464

Keywords:

Hepatitis v Ig M IG G IFA morbidity.

Abstract

This disease has been looked at as a pressing problem all over the world until recently due to prolonged latency in most cases, virulence at high levels, the severity of the complications that occur, and the infection of drugs that have sufficient effectiveness in Da-fly the virus. As a complication in chronic hepatitis C, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma often develop. According to the opinions of many authors, 25% of people with chronic hepatitis C may develop liver cirrhosis and 1-5% of them develop hepatocellular carcinoma. Every year, 4-5% of patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis develop Hepato-cellulular carcinoma, and therefore every year in the world 200 000 - 300 000 Ta mortality is observed.


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-23

Часть–3_ Апрель –2025

293

STUDY OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTIVIRAL DRUGS

IN THE LIVER DISEASES

Kholiev Bakhodir Oltibayevich

Bukhara State Medical Institute named after

Abu Ali ibn Sina, Uzbekistan, Bukhara, A. Navoi St. 1 Phone number: +998 (65)

223-00-50 e-mail:

xoliyev.baxodir@bsmi.uz

Abstract: This disease has been looked at as a pressing problem all over the

world until recently due to prolonged latency in most cases, virulence at high levels,

the severity of the complications that occur, and the infection of drugs that have

sufficient effectiveness in Da-fly the virus. As a complication in chronic hepatitis C,

liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma often develop. According to the opinions

of many authors, 25% of people with chronic hepatitis C may develop liver cirrhosis

and 1-5% of them develop hepatocellular carcinoma. Every year, 4-5% of patients

diagnosed with liver cirrhosis develop Hepato-cellulular carcinoma, and therefore

every year in the world 200 000 - 300 000 Ta mortality is observed.

Keywords: Hepatitis v, Ig M, IG G, IFA, morbidity.

Laboratory diagnostics of hepatitis V is carried out through the IFA method

by detecting serum HBsAg, HBeAg, antitel (IG M and Ig G anti HBcAg, Ig G anti

HBeAg, IG G anti HBsAg), as well as by detecting hepatitis v infection DNA from

kondan, other biological fluids or organ tissues of the div in the pzr Method [2].

HbsAg is considered the most important marker of infection, and it is

detected in acute viral hepatitis v blood infestation, starting from 2 – 5 weeks of age

to the recovery period (lifelong in the chronic form of the disease). The circulatory

period of HbsAg in the blood is 70-80 days on average [3].

Hepatitis v DNA is detected from SI blood plasma by the pzr method. The

number of viruses in the blood increases very quickly during the period of stagnation

of the disease and reaches its maximum in the acute phase of the disease. Of viruses.


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-23

Часть–3_ Апрель –2025

294

Circulations in the blood for 5-6 months are considered an unpleasant prognostic sign,

which means that a chronic form of the disease has developed.

The quantitative indicator of viral DNA Si is important in predicting the

effectiveness of antiviral treatment. If the viral concentration is less than 105 PCs/ML,

the treatment is effectively tolerated, otherwise it is required to use a different

treatment scheme [5, 7].

Serological tests for VGD are performed only in patients with hepatitis V,

which means that HbsAg is detected in their blood. Markers expressing vgd damage

are RNA VGD, IG M±IG G anti HDVs. Antibodies are detected by the IFA method,

while viral RNA Si is detected by the pzr method.

In the case of superinfection, RNA HDV may not be detected in the acute

phase of the disease. During this period, IG M anti HDV, combined with IG G anti

HDV, is detected at higher titers compared to co- infection. IG M ± IG G is the

diagnostic marker of svg D to have a consistently high amount of anti HDV [18].

In the IFA method of detecting viral hepatitis C, it is important to

identify antibodies against viral proteins [3].

Method 2 is a pzr method that allows detection of viral RNA si. This

method is considered the only one that proves the presence of a living virus in the

div and has the ability to detect viral RNAs in the mine in Weeks 2-3 of viral

damage. The detection of viral RNA Si is the “gold” standard for diagnosing hepatitis

C. Currently, through the pzr method, qualitative, quantitative and genotypic

indicators of the hepatitis C virus are determined. The sensitivity level of the method

is 10-50 PCs/ML. Determination of the genotypic belonging of the hepatitis C virus

is carried out before starting an antiviral treatment and is considered necessary to

correctly select an antiviral drug and determine the duration of Drug Administration

[1]. Through the pzr method, viral RNA s can be detected not only in the blood, but

also from liver tissue. This method makes it possible to determine whether there is a

role of the virus in the development of GTSK in the case when serum anti-viral or

viral RNA Si is not detected [5]. An increase in ALT levels in chronic hepatitis has

also been considered clinically an indicator of liver damage and has been studied in


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-23

Часть–3_ Апрель –2025

295

most studies. In one such study conducted, the increase in the amount of Alt was

divided into 3 levels : Level 1 is at the norm limit, Level 2 is above the norm limit (up

to 3 times) and Level 3 is higher (more than 3 times). ALT levels were found in 22

patients (48.9%) at the norm limit, 16 patients (35.6% ) at Level 2 of the norm, and 7

patients (15.5%) at Level 3. From this it can be concluded that patients with SVG s

are often more likely to have cases of ALT levels within normal or norm limits [7]

During similar investigations, Bacon B. R. and other authors (2002y.)

by SVG s patients had normal blood ALT levels in 30% of patients tested

independently of gender and age, while 40% of patients had normal levels up to 2

times higher than the normal upper limit [3].

Fazilov V.X. and in the course of studies conducted by hammuallifs,

testing of alt enzyme activity in the blood of patients with SVG s through dynamic

Ravish (1 time in 2-3 months for 12 months) found that only 3.7% of 168 patients

consistently showed normal levels of the enzyme, or no more than 1.5 times above

the norm threshold. In 23.9% of patients, high rates of ALT in constant ravation have

been observed (up to 1.5 - 12 times higher than the upper norm limit). In a large

percentage of patients (72.4%), it has been observed that the amount of the enzyme

increases wave-wise from normal to 1.5 times and above [4]. As a result of massive

damage to liver cells, an increase in the amount of AST, in addition to which the

mitochondrial enzyme is cisobed, is also observed. Low ALT levels do not always

indicate a healthy liver. Many factors influence the amount of this indicator. Examples

of such factors include hemochromatosis, vitamin V6 deficiency, development of

JTS, blockage of intracellular alt production under the influence of toxins. It should

also be mentioned that not all damaged liver cells produce Alt [1]. The viral load in

the div is also considered to be of great importance in the change in the level of liver

damage and biochemical indicators of blood. In patients with low viral load,

transaminases and ggtp up to 3 times increase in blood biochemical indicators have

been observed. No changes were observed between the oxyls in the blood and their

fractions. In 6 patients in this group, Alt and AST levels were observed to be 3-5 times

higher than the norm upper limit, with moderate increases in total bilirubin,


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-23

Часть–3_ Апрель –2025

296

fibrinogen, PTI, mild dysproteinemia – a slight decrease in albumin levels, and a slow

increase in α2 - i γ-globulins levels. In patients with high and very high viral load,

moderate activity of blood biochemical indicators was observed (in 8 patients), while

in the rest of the patients (in 7) this rate was at a high level. In patients with high

biochemical activity observed, 10 N of the amount of transaminases, GGTP 5 n, an

increase in the amount of bilirubin with an unconnected fraction predominance(71.8

± 5.1 mkmol/L), an increase in the amount of fibrinogen (5.9 ± 0.3 g/l), a decrease in

the prothrombin index (71 ± 1.4%), a significant degree of dysproteinemia was

observed [9]. Liver fibrosis (JF) is considered one of the unpleasant consequences of

chronic diffuse diseases of the liver of various etiologies, and its detection at an early

time is considered important for the backwardness of liver changes and the choice of

optimal treatment tactics [4].

The study of JF in patients with chronic diffuse liver disease (JSDK) is

considered necessary for the following conditions: 1) clearly developed JF affects the

effectiveness of the course of treatment and increases the duration of the treatment

process, and requires an increase in the dose of drugs used in the treatment [5]; 2)

determination of the fibrosis stage makes it possible to determine the]; 3) non-

alcoholic steatogepatitis makes it possible to ososize the drugs given by detecting JF

in identified patients [6]; 4) the development of re-JF against the background of

treatment serves as the main criterion of the treatment process, and this condition is

actively studied in the process of clinical studies of new drug drugs. [5]; 5) patients

with pronounced liver fibrosis are considered to be patients in the high risk group for

the development of JTS and GTSK [8]. In modern hepatological practice, there are

invasive and noninvasive methods used to detect JF. Invasive diagnosis consists of

performing a liver puncture biopsy (JPB). This method is held in hospital conditions,

being considered the "gold standard" in determining JF. There are a number of

contraindications to the process of detecting JF in this way, and there is a risk that the

process will be complicated until death [8, 10.]. In addition according to many authors

the data obtained as a result of morphological examination of liver tissue can in some

cases be considered suspect and cannot be sufficient to establish treatment tactics


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-23

Часть–3_ Апрель –2025

297

[14,6.]. To give JF noninvasive baxo, 2 different i.e. instrumental (liver elastography)

and serological (using Fibro-Aktitest, Fibromax and Steatoscrin diagnostic panels)

methods are diluted. Hepatic Elastography is a noninvasive verification method that

informs about vibrasion impulses and changes in the elastic composition of the liver

through their analysis in computers, the progression of JF in the process of re-

examinations in dynamics [99, 97, 108]. Liver elastography is performed through the

FibroScan apparatus. The noninvasive serological assessment of JF is a Fibrotest-

method analysis that exhibits 5 biochemical indicators in itself: α2-macroglobulin,

haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, gammagglutamintranspep-tidase, and total bilirubin,

and they are thought to be linked via discriminant function. From the biochemical

data obtained , the level of JF is determined by an index obtained based on

mathematical analyzes, taking into account the age, gender, height and div weight

of the patient [10.].

LITERATURE:

1. Ziyodulloyevich A. M. IN CHRONIC VIRAL HEPATITIS AND CIRRHOSIS OF

THE LIVER, THE STUDY OF CYTOKINE LEVELS //BARQARORLIK VA

YETAKCHI TADQIQOTLAR ONLAYN ILMIY JURNALI. – 2022. – Т. 2. – №.

12. – С. 784-787.

2. Ziyodulloyevich A. M. The Study of Cytokine Levels in Chronic Viral Hepatitis

and Liver Cirrhosis //EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION IN

NONFORMAL EDUCATION. – 2022. – Т. 2. – №. 12. – С. 63-66.

3. Худойдодова С. Г., Арашова Г. А., Нарзуллаева М. К. Пробиотики в лечении

лямблиоза //Международный Евроазиатский конгресс по инфекционным

болезням. – 2008. – Т. 1. – №. 2. – С. 250.

4. Худойдодова С. Г., Арашова Г. А., Мирзоева М. Р. Вирусли гептит В

лямблиоз билан кечган микстинфекцияда хужайра ва гуморал иммунитет

курсаткичларининг патогенетик аҳамияти //Инфекция, иммунитет и

фармакология. – 2011. – №. 1-2. – С. 103-110.


background image

MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Выпуск журнала №-23

Часть–3_ Апрель –2025

298

5. Худойдодова С. Г. Состояние эритроцитарного и тромбоцитарно-

сосудистого гемостаза при сальмонеллезе у детей раннего возраста. – 1997.

6. Oblokulov A. R., Husenova Z. Z., Ergashev M. M. Procalcitonin as an indicator of

antibacterial therapy in covid-19 //Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology.

– 2021. – С. 5220-5224.

7. Oblokulov A. R., Niyozov G. E. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of

patients with COVID-19 //International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. – 2020.

– С. 3749-3752.

8. Облокулов А. Р. и др. Особенности течения лямблиоза у взрослых

//Инфекция, иммунитет и фармакология. – 1999. – С. 151-156.

9. Облокулов А. Р. и др. АБУ АЛИ ИБН СИНА. СТРАНИЦЫ ЖИЗНИ

ВЕЛИКОГО УЧЕНОГО //Новый день в медицине. – 2020. – №. 4. – С. 563-564.

10. Jalilova A. S. FEATURES OF CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF

CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION IN CHILDREN //International Journal of

Medical Sciences And Clinical Research. – 2022. – Т. 2. – №. 09. – С. 12-16.

11. Жалилова А. С., Косимова Д. С. Клинико–Лабораторная Характеристика

Пациентов С Covid-19 И Предиктор Антибактериальной Терапии //CENTRAL

ASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND NATURAL SCIENCES. – 2021. – С. 81-

86.

12. Абдуллоев М. и т. д. Взгляд врача-инфекциониста на течение насморка у

детей // НАУЧНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ПРИКЛАДНЫХ И МЕДИЦИНСКИХ НАУК. –

2023. – Т. 2. – Нет. 12. – С. 930-939.

13.

Абдуллоев М. З. Особенности Течении Кори У Детей //Journal of Intellectual

Property and Human Rights. – 2024. – Т. 3. – №. 4. – С. 26-33.