Authors

  • Wasim Faraz,
    Master's degree student Department of Traumatology and Neurosurgery BSMI;
  • Jamshid Mardonov,
    PHD, Associate Professor Department of Traumatology and Neurosurgery BSMI;
  • Dilmurod Khojiev,
    PHD, head of the department Anatomy and clinical anatomy, associate professor TB TMA. 3

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.mpttp.76375

Abstract

Extradural spinal tumors, although generally rare, present significant clinical problems because of their ability to induce spinal cord compression neurological deficits and spinal cord compression. This  examines 37 patients who underwent surgical management for extradural spinal tumors in the related hospitals of BSMI from 2022 to 2025 . The considerations include evaluated clinical presentations, diagnostic accuracy, surgical outcomes, andpostoperative Recovery. It has been demonstrated that 78% of patients experienced back pain, while 72% of the tumors were metastatic. Minimally invasive strategies were employed in 42% of patients, leading to reduction.


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

277

https://universalpublishings.com

Wasim Faraz,

Master's degree student Department of Traumatology and

Neurosurgery BSMI

;

1

Jamshid Mardonov,

PHD, Associate Professor Department of

Traumatology and Neurosurgery BSMI

;

2

Dilmurod Khojiev,

PHD, head of the department Anatomy and clinical

anatomy, associate professor TB TMA

.

3

Extradural Spinal Tumors: Clinical Presentation, Surgical Management

and outcomes, A Retrospective Study of Patients


Abstrac

Extradural spinal tumors, although generally rare, present significant clinical

problems because of their ability to induce spinal cord compression neurological
deficits and spinal cord compression. This examines 37 patients who underwent
surgical management for extradural spinal tumors in the related hospitals of
BSMI from 2022 to 2025 . The considerations include evaluated clinical
presentations, diagnostic accuracy, surgical outcomes, andpostoperative
Recovery. It has been demonstrated that 78% of patients experienced back pain,
while 72% of the tumors were metastatic. Minimally invasive strategies were
employed in 42% of patients, leading to reduction.


Introduction

Extradural spinal tumors is present outside of the spinal cord but within the

spinal canal, are a critical cause of horribleness due to their potential to compress
the spinal cord and cause extreme neurological deficits. These tumors can emerge
from different tissues, including bone, intervertebral circles, and metastatic stores
from other organs. Clinical introduction changes broadly, extending from
localized back torment to loss of motion or incontinence. Early conclusion and
fitting administration are basic to making strides results.


The spine could be a common location for both essential and metastatic

tumors, with extradural tumors book keeping for a significant extent of spinal
neoplasms. Whereas essential tumors like schwannomas and meningiomas are


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

278

https://universalpublishings.com

uncommon, metastatic tumors are more predominant, regularly starting from
cancers of the lung, breast, or prostate. Propels in symptomatic imaging,
especially MRI, have revolutionized the discovery and characterization of these
tumors, empowering precise treatment arranging.

This think about points to supply a comprehensive investigation of the clinical

introduction, demonstrative approaches, and surgical administration of extradural
spinal tumors. By assessing results in a cohort of 37 patients, this inquire about
looks for to highlight the

Study Objective

The essential objective of this ponder is to explore the etiology, clinical

introduction, and administration of extradural spinal tumors, with a specific
center on surgical results.


Aim of rese

arch

Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of modern imaging in identifying

extradural spinal tumors.

Evaluating the effect of surgical excision, minimally invasive techniques,

control tumor spreading and preserving neurological well being.

Assessing postoperative complications, functional recovery and quality of life.
Providing evidence based recommendations for managing extradural spinal

tumors and incorporating the latest advancements in oncology and spinal surgery.


Importance of research

Extradural spinal tumors present a significant thret due to ability to cause

spinal cord compression and irreversible neurological damage.Even with all
advancements in diagnostic and management, the treatment of these tumors
remains still complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. This study
contributes to the existing div of knowledge by providing a detailed analysis of
surgical outcomes in a cohort of 37 patients, revealing into the effectiveness of
modern methods of treatment strategies. By highlighting the importance of early
diagnosis, precise surgical intervention, and comprehensive after surgery care,
this research aims to inform clinical practice and improve patient outcomes .

Literature Review


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

279

https://universalpublishings.com

Extradural spinal tumors encircle a diverse group of neoplasms, including

primary and metastatic tumors.More common are metastatic tumors, accounting
for up to 90% of spinal tumors in some series [1]. The spine is the third most
common site for metastatic tumors, following the tumor of lungs and liver [2].


Etiology and Pathophysiology

Extradural tumors can begin from bone, cartilage, or connective tissue.

Metastatic tumors regularly spread hematogenously, with vertebral bodies being
the foremost regularly affected sites [3]. The pathophysiology of spinal line
compression in these tumors comes about from coordinate mechanical weight,
vascular compromise, and fiery forms [4].


Clinical Presentation

Side effects change based on tumor area, estimate, and development rate.

Common introductions incorporate back torment, radiculopathy, and
myelopathy. Progressed cases may include paraplegia, bowel or bladder
dysfunction, or cauda equina disorder [5].

Diagnostic Imaging

MRI is the gold standard for diagnosing extradural spinal tumors, giving point

by point data on tumor area and estimate. CT filters are valuable for assessing
hard inclusion, whereas PET filters offer assistance recognize metastatic injuries
[6].


Surgical Administration

Surgical resection remains the foundation of treatment. Later headways, such

as negligibly intrusive procedures and intraoperative neuromonitoring, have
moved forward results and diminished complications. Adjuvant treatments,
counting radiation and chemotherapy, are vital for overseeing metastatic tumors
[7].

Methods

Study Plan


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

280

https://universalpublishings.com

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 37 patients diagnosed with

extradural spinal tumors who underwent surgical treatment between 2022 and
2025. Institutional review board approval was obtained, and educated consent
was secured from all members.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Consideration criteria included histologically confirmed extradural spinal

tumors and surgical resection. Patients with non-spinal tumors, deficient records,
or deficiently follow-up data were excluded.

Data Collection

Data on demographics, clinical presentation, radiological findings, surgical

techniques, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Variables included tumor
sort, area, surgical approach, complications, and functional recovery.


Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics. Continuous factors
were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables

were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The chi square test compared
categorical data, with a p value <0.05 considered significant.

Surgical techniques
Preoperative preparation

Imaging

All patients experienced preoperative MRI and CT looks to survey tumor

estimate area, and relationship to encompassing structures.

Neurological Evaluation

Pattern neurological status was recorded utilizing the Frankel reviewing

framework.

Multidisciplinary planning

Cases were talked about in a multidisciplinary group assembly including

neurosurgeons, oncologists, radiologists, and restoration masters.

Minimal Invasive Surgery (MIS)


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

281

https://universalpublishings.com

Techniques

MIS was performed in 42% of cases (15 patients) utilizing tubular retractors

and percutaneous pedicle screw obsession.

Steps

1. Positioning

The quiet was put in a inclined position on a radiolucent table.

2. Incision

Little entry points were made over the target range.

3. Access

Tubular retractors were embedded beneath fluoroscopic direction.

4. Resection

Tumor resection was performed beneath tiny direction, protecting

encompassing and neural structures.

5. Stabilization

Percutaneous pedicle screws and bars were utilized for spinal stabilization.

Points of interest

Speedier recuperation, diminished postoperative torment, and shorter healing

center remains.

Case example

A 58 year old male with a metastatic lung tumor at T7 experienced MIS with

total resection and stabilization. Postoperative MRI affirmed no leftover tumor
and the persistent was walking in 48 hours.


Open Surgery with Intraoperative Neuromonitoring (IONM)

Technique

Open surgery was performed in 58% of cases (22 patients) using a back or

anterior approach.

Steps

1. Positioning

The patient was placed in a prone or lateral position, depending on tumor

location.

2. Incision

A midline incision was made to expose the spinal column.

3. Laminectomy/Corpectomy


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

282

https://universalpublishings.com

Bone removal was performed to access the tumor.

4. Resection

Tumor resection was performed under continuous IONM to avoid

neurological damage.

5. Stabilization

Pedicle screws, rods, or cages were used for spinal stabilization.

Advantages

Enhanced safety and reduced risk of neurological deficits.

Case Example

A 45-year-old female with a primary schwannoma at L2 underwent open

resection with IONM. The tumor was totally removed, and the patient appeared
no postoperative neurological deficits.

En Bloc Resection for Primary Tumors

Technique

En bloc resection was performed in 12% of cases (4 patients) for primary

tumors such as chordomas and osteosarcomas.

Steps:

1. Positioning

The patient was set in a prone position.

2. .Incision

A wide incision was made to expose the tumor and surrounding structures.

3. Resection

The tumor was dissected en bloc, ensuring no tumor spillage.

4. Reconstruction

Spinal reconstruction was performed utilizing bone grafts or cages.

Advantages


Lower recurrence rates for aggressive primary tumors.

Case Example

A 37 year old male with a sacral chordoma experienced en bloc resection with

sacral reconstruction. The patient remained recurrence free at the 2 year follow
up.

Postoperative Care.


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

283

https://universalpublishings.com

Immediate Care

Patients were observed within the ICU for 24 to 48 hours. Pain administration,

wound care and neurological assessments were prioritized.

Rehabilitation

Physical therapy was started within 72 hours of surgery to improve mobility

and strength. Patients with neurological deficits received specialized
neurorehabilitation.

Results

Patient Characteristics

The study included 37 patients ( 20 males and 17 females ) with a cruel age of

54.3 ± 12.7 years. The most common showing symptom was back pain 78%
followed by radiculopathy 45% and myelopathy 32%.

Figure:1 Patient Characteristics

Tumor Characteristics

Primary tumors accounted for 28% of cases whereas metastatic tumors

comprised 72%. The most common primary tumors were schwannomas 12% and
meningiomas (10%). Metastatic tumors originated primarily from the lung 35%,
breast 25% and prostate 20%.


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

284

https://universalpublishings.com

Figure:2. Tumor characteristics.

Surgical Outcomes

Total resection was accomplished in 68% of cases. minimally invasive

procedures were used in 42% of patients with a critical reduction in postoperative
complications p<0.05.

The overall complication rate was 18% with wound infection 8% and

cerebrospinal liquid spillage 6% being the most common.

Figure:3 Surgical outcomes.

Functional Recovery

At the 6 month followup 75% of patients appeared significant enhancement in

neurological function as measured by the Frankel grading system.


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

285

https://universalpublishings.com

Figure:4 Functional recovery.

Discussion

The management of extradural spinal tumors requires a multidisciplinary

approach, advanced imaging, exact surgical techniques and adjuvant treatments.
Minimally invasive techniques illustrated significant benefits including reduced
complications and speedier recuperation. In any case challenges stay in
overseeing recurrent and metastatic tumors. Future research should focus on
refining surgical techniques and creating targeted treatments.

Conclusion

Extradural spinal tumors are a complex clinical entity. Advances in diagnostic

imaging and surgical techniques have essentially moved forward results, but
advance research is required to address challenges postured by repetitive and
metastatic tumors. This ponder highlights the significance of early diagnosis,
exact surgical intervention, and comprehensive postoperative care.


background image

МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:

ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА

Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024

SJIF 2024 = 5.444

Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март

286

https://universalpublishings.com

References

1. Choi D, Crockard A.Epidemiology of spinal tumors. Spine J.

2013;13(5):558-564.

2. Klimo P, Schmidt MH. Surgical management of spinal metastases.

Oncologist. 2004;9(2):188-196.

3. Wong DA, Fornasier VL, MacNab I. Spinal metastases: the obvious, the

occult, and the impostors. Spine. 1990;15(1):1-4.

4. Bilsky MH, Lis E, Raizer J, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of metastatic

spinal tumor. Oncologist. 1999;4(6):459-469.

5. Laufer I, Rubin DG, Lis E, et al. The NOMS framework: approach to the

treatment of spinal metastatic tumors. Oncologist.2013;18(6):744-751.

6. Van Goethem JW, van den Hauwe L, Ozsarlak O, et al. Spinal tumors. Eur

J Radiol. 2004;50(2):159-176.

7. Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC, et al. A novel classification system for

spinal instability in neoplastic disease. Spine. 2010;35(22):E1221-E1227.

8. Gokaslan ZL, York JE, Walsh GL, et al. Transthoracic vertebrectomy for

metastatic spinal tumors. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(4):599-609.

9. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, et al. Direct decompressive surgical

resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer:
a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):643-648.

10. Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R. Primary bone tumors of the spine:

terminology and surgical staging. Spine. 1997;22(9):1036-1044.

11. Wasim Faraz, & Mardanov Jamshid Jahongirovich. Navigating Extradural

Spinal Tumor; Endoscopic Surgical Treatment of Extradural Spinal
Tumor. Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity. 2025; 40, 37–42.


References

Choi D, Crockard A.Epidemiology of spinal tumors. Spine J. 2013;13(5):558-564.

Klimo P, Schmidt MH. Surgical management of spinal metastases. Oncologist. 2004;9(2):188-196.

Wong DA, Fornasier VL, MacNab I. Spinal metastases: the obvious, the occult, and the impostors. Spine. 1990;15(1):1-4.

Bilsky MH, Lis E, Raizer J, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of metastatic spinal tumor. Oncologist. 1999;4(6):459-469.

Laufer I, Rubin DG, Lis E, et al. The NOMS framework: approach to the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors. Oncologist.2013;18(6):744-751.

Van Goethem JW, van den Hauwe L, Ozsarlak O, et al. Spinal tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(2):159-176.

Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC, et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease. Spine. 2010;35(22):E1221-E1227.

Gokaslan ZL, York JE, Walsh GL, et al. Transthoracic vertebrectomy for metastatic spinal tumors. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(4):599-609.

Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):643-648.

Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R. Primary bone tumors of the spine: terminology and surgical staging. Spine. 1997;22(9):1036-1044.

Wasim Faraz, & Mardanov Jamshid Jahongirovich. Navigating Extradural Spinal Tumor; Endoscopic Surgical Treatment of Extradural Spinal Tumor. Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity. 2025; 40, 37–42.