Authors

  • Zakhro Mamadaliyeva
    Teacher of Ferghana State University
  • Islomjonova Gulruxsor
    Student of Ferghana State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.siad.76381

Keywords:

morpheme logos morphology speech meaning word form grammar. Introduction

Abstract

This article discusses the significance of morphology and its role in language. Morphology, stemming from the Greek words "morphe" (form) and "logos" (science or word), constitutes a segment of grammar dedicated to the examination of words within the context of their parts of speech. In essence, morphology scrutinizes the broad meanings and alterations of words.


background image

SYNAPSES:

Insights Across the

Disciplines

Volume 2, Issue 3

98

Synapses:

Insights Across the Disciplines

MORPHOLOGY AS THE STUDY OF INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF WORDS

Zakhro Mamadaliyeva

Teacher of Ferghana State University

Islomjonova Gulruxsor

Student of Ferghana State University

Annotation.

This article discusses the significance of morphology and its role

in language. Morphology, stemming from the Greek words "morphe" (form) and
"logos" (science or word), constitutes a segment of grammar dedicated to the
examination of words within the context of their parts of speech. In essence,
morphology scrutinizes the broad meanings and alterations of words.

Key words:

morpheme, logos, morphology, speech, meaning, word, form,

grammar.

Introduction
Morphology

(from Greek

morphe

meaning "form" and

logos

meaning "word")

is a branch of grammar focused on the internal structure of words, their grammatical
categories, and their meanings.

The study of modern English morphology encompasses four main areas:

1.

General analysis of morphemes and types of word formation.

2.

The classification system of parts of speech.

3.

The detailed examination of each part of speech, including its grammatical
categories and syntactical functions.

A

morpheme

is defined as the smallest meaningful unit of a word. Comprised

of phonemes, it cannot be divided into smaller units without losing its significative
function.

Example:

The word "writers" can be broken down into three morphemes:

1.

writ-

(root morpheme) conveys the core lexical meaning.

2.

-er-

(agent morpheme) denotes someone who performs the action of writing.

3.

-s

(plural morpheme) indicates that the noun is plural.

Some morphemes may sound identical but have different meanings, known as

homonyms

. For instance, the morpheme

-er

in "writer" (indicating an agent) has a

homonym

-er

in "longer" (indicating comparative degree).


background image

SYNAPSES:

Insights Across the

Disciplines

Volume 2, Issue 3

99

Synapses:

Insights Across the Disciplines

There are also

zero morphemes

, where the absence of a morpheme conveys a specific

meaning. For example, in the comparison between "book" and "books," the plural
"books" includes the

-s

morpheme, whereas the singular "book" includes a zero

morpheme indicating it is singular.

Traditional Classification of Morphemes:

Morphemes are classified based on

two main criteria:

1.

Positional

: The placement of marginal morphemes relative to central ones.

2.

Semantic/Functional

: The relative contribution of the morphemes to the overall

meaning of the word.

Based on these criteria, morphemes are divided into:

Root Morphemes (Roots)

: Convey the concrete, material meaning of the word.

They are the core lexical components of content words.

Affixal Morphemes (Affixes)

: Specify additional aspects of the word's

meaning, which can be lexical or grammatical.

Affixal morphemes include:

1.

Prefixes

2.

Suffixes

Prefixes and lexical suffixes serve a word-building function and, together with

the root, form the word stem.

3.

Inflexions (Grammatical Suffixes)

: These morphemes form grammatical

variations of words and do not have independent lexical meanings but express
different morphological categories.

The general structure of an English word can be represented as: prefix + root +

lexical suffix + inflection/grammatical suffix.

The Concept of Distribution in Linguistics

The

distribution

of a linguistic unit refers to the totality of its environments,

essentially its context within different classes or categories.

Distributional analysis

aims to identify and study language units based on their

textual environments, i.e., the elements adjacent to them in text.

Examples:

1.

The/boat/s/were/gain/ing/speed

o

This sentence is divided into

morphs

, which are combinations of phonemes that

convey meaning and cannot be subdivided further.

2.

un-pardon-able


background image

SYNAPSES:

Insights Across the

Disciplines

Volume 2, Issue 3

100

Synapses:

Insights Across the Disciplines

o

In this word, the root

pardon

has a left environment (the prefix

un-

) and a right

environment (the suffix

-able

). Conversely,

pardon

is the right environment for

the prefix and the left environment for the suffix.

Types of Distribution:

1.

Contrastive Distribution

:

o

Morphs with different meanings or functions are in contrastive distribution and
form different morphemes.

o

Example

: The suffixes

-(e)d

and

-ing

in "returned" and "returning".

2.

Non-Contrastive Distribution

:

o

Morphs with the same meaning or function are in non-contrastive distribution
and are called

free alternants

or

free variants

of the same morpheme.

o

Example

: The suffixes

-(e)d

and

-t

in "learned" and "learnt".

3.

Complementary Distribution

:

o

Formally different morphs with the same function in different environments are
in complementary distribution and are

allomorphs

of the same morpheme.

o

Examples

:

The plural morpheme

-s

has allomorphs /-s/, /-z/, /-iz/ depending on the

phonological environment.

The past tense morpheme

-ed

has allomorphs /-id/, /-t/, /-d/.

The plural allomorph

-en

in "oxen" and "children", and the zero suffix in

"sheep".

Complementary distribution helps identify grammatical elements.

Types of Morphemes Based on Self-Dependence:

1.

Free Morphemes

:

o

Can form words independently.

o

Example

: In "handful,"

hand

is a free morpheme.

2.

Bound Morphemes

:

o

Cannot form words by themselves and are identified as part of words.

o

Example

: In "handful,"

-ful

is a bound morpheme.

There are few productive bound morphemes in English, most of which are
homonymous:

1.

-(e)s

[plural of nouns, possessive case of nouns, third person singular present of

verbs]

2.

-(e)d

[past and past participle of verbs]

3.

-ing

[gerund and present participle]

4.

-er

,

-est

[comparative and superlative degrees of adjectives and adverbs]


background image

SYNAPSES:

Insights Across the

Disciplines

Volume 2, Issue 3

101

Synapses:

Insights Across the Disciplines

Semi-bound morphemes

include auxiliary word-morphemes (

do

,

be

,

have

,

will

,

shall

,

would

,

should

), adverbial elements (

more

,

most

), the infinitive particle (

to

), and

articles. These function as separate elements in speech but form categorical unities with
their stem-words.

Conclusion

Morphology is a vital subfield of linguistics that delves into the intricacies of

word formation and structure. By understanding morphology, linguists gain insights
into the fundamental processes that shape languages. Whether through inflection,
derivation, compounding, or other morphological processes, the study of morphemes
and their distribution provides a deeper understanding of how language conveys
meaning and adapts to various grammatical and contextual needs.

References:

1. ru.m.wiki.versity.org wiki
2. en.m.wikipedia.org> wiki
3. Quora Inc 2024 quora.com what are the functions of morphology
4. Cogent Education volume 5 2018 issue – 1.
5. Warner, N. O."In Search of Literary Science the Russian Formalist Tradition."

Pacific Coast Philology 17.Pp. 69-71; 1982.

References

ru.m.wiki.versity.org wiki

en.m.wikipedia.org> wiki

Quora Inc 2024 quora.com what are the functions of morphology

Cogent Education volume 5 2018 issue – 1.

Warner, N. O."In Search of Literary Science the Russian Formalist Tradition." Pacific Coast Philology 17.Pp. 69-71; 1982.