Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Journal home page:
https://inscience.uz/index.php/socinov/index
The effectiveness of neuropedagogical methods in
developing intellectual competence of future teachers
Rustambek URINOV
1
Fergana State Technical University
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received April 2025
Received in revised form
15 May 2025
Accepted 25 May 2025
Available online
15 June 2025
This study evaluates the impact of neuropedagogical teaching
methods on the intellectual competence of undergraduate teacher-
education students in Uzbekistan. We define intellectual
competence as the ability to think analytically and creatively,
including skills such as problem-solving, critical thinking, and
reflective reasoning. In a quasi-experimental design, 60
pedagogical university students were randomly assigned to an
experimental group or a control group. Pre and post-intervention
assessments measured gains in intellectual competence. The
experimental group showed significantly greater improvement
than the control group. These results suggest that brain-based
learning activities combined with metacognitive strategy training
substantially enhance future teachers’ intellectual skills relative to
conventional methods. We
conclude that integrating
neuropedagogical principles into teacher training can significantly
advance students’ cognitive and reflective abilities, aligning with
Uzbekistan’s education reform goals
.
2181-
1415/©
2025 in Science LLC.
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol6-iss5/S-pp624-629
This is an open access article under the Attribution 4.0 International
(CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru)
Keywords:
neuropedagogy;
brain-based learning;
metacognition;
intellectual competence;
teacher education.
Bo‘lajak o‘qituvchilarning intellektual kompetentligini
rivojlantirishda
neyropedagogik
metodlarning
samaradorligi
ANNOTATSIYA
Kalit so‘zlar
:
neyropedagogika;
miya faoliyatiga asoslangan
ta’lim;
metakognisiya;
intellektual qobiliyat;
o‘qituvchi ta’limi
.
Ushbu
tadqiqot
O‘zbekistondagi
pedagogik
ta’lim
yo‘nalishidagi
bakalavr
talabalarining
intellektual
kompetentligini rivojlantirishda neyropedagogik o‘qitish
metodlarining
ta’sirini
baholaydi.
Biz
intellektual
kompetentlikni analitik va ijodiy fikrlash qobiliyati sifatida
talqin qilamiz, bu muammoni hal qilish, tanqidiy fikrlash va
1
Assistant, Fergana State Technical University, Fergana, Uzbekistan. E-mail: Rustamsilver96@mail.ru
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
05 (2025) / ISSN 2181-1415
625
reflektiv mulohaza yuritish kabi ko‘nikmalarni o‘z ichiga oladi.
Kvasieksperimental dizayn asosida 60 nafar pedagogika
yo‘nalishidagi talaba tasodifiy ravishda ikkita guruhga bo‘l
indi:
eksperimental guruh va nazorat guruhi. Eksperiment oldi va
keyingi
baholashlar
orqali
talabalar
intellektual
kompetentligidagi o‘zgarishlar o‘lchandi. Eksperimental guruh
nazorat guruhiga nisbatan ancha yuqori natijalarni ko‘rsatdi. Bu
natijalar shun
i ko‘rsatadiki, miya faoliyatiga asoslangan o‘quv
faoliyatlari va metakognitiv strategiyalarni birlashtirish bo‘lajak
o‘qituvchilarning intellektual ko‘nikmalarini an’anaviy usullarga
qaraganda ancha samarali tarzda rivojlantiradi. Biz xulosa
qilamizki,
ne
yropedagogik
prinsiplarni
o‘qituvchilarni
tayyorlash jarayoniga integratsiyalash orqali talabalarining
kognitiv va reflektiv qobiliyatlarini sezilarli darajada
rivojlantirish mumkin bo‘ladi. Bu esa O‘zbekistonning ta’lim
islohotlari maqsadlariga to‘liq mos
keladi.
Эффективность нейропедагогических методов в
развитии интеллектуальной компетентности будущих
педагогов
АННОТАЦИЯ
Ключевые слова:
нейропедагогика;
обучение,
основанное на работе
мозга;
метапознание;
интеллектуальная
компетентность;
педагогическое
образование
.
Данное
исследование
оценивает
влияние
нейропедагогических
методов обучения на развитие
интеллектуальной
компетентности
студентов
педагогических вузов Узбекистана. Под интеллектуальной
компетентностью мы понимаем способность мыслить
аналитически и творчески, включая такие навыки, как
решение проблем, критическое мышление и рефлексивное
рассуждение. В рамках квазиэкспериментального дизайна,
60 студентов педагогического университета были
случайным образом распределены на экспериментальную
группу и контрольную группу. До и после эксперимента
проводились
оценивания,
измеряющие
прирост
интеллектуальной компетентности. Экспериментальная
группа показала значительно больший прогресс по
сравнению с контрольной группой. Эти результаты
свидетельствуют о том, что обучение на основе
нейропедагогики в сочетании с метакогнитивными
стратегиями существенно повышает интеллектуальные
способности будущих педагогов по сравнению с
традиционными методами. Мы приходим к выводу, что
интеграция принципов нейропедагогики в подготовку
учителей может значительно способствовать развитию
когнитивных и рефлексивных способностей студентов,
соответствуя
целям
образовательных
реформ
в
Узбекистане
.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
05 (2025) / ISSN 2181-1415
626
INTRODUCTION
Modern educational reforms in Uzbekistan emphasize active, student-centered
pedagogy and the development of teacher competencies. In this context, intellectual
competence understood as the ability to think analytically and creatively (encompassing
analysis, synthesis, abstraction, and critical thinking) is considered essential for future
educators. Uzbek educational policy prioritizes explicitly raising the professional and
intellectual capacities of teachers, noting that without innovative teaching methods, the
quality of education cannot improve. In particular, the concept of
neuropedagogy
(educational neuroscience) has emerged as a promising foundation for this effort.
Neuropedagogy integrates neuroscience and psychology insights into teaching practice,
w
ith the aim of optimizing learning processes by accounting for students’ brain functions
and individual neurological characteristics.
Recent literature highlights several core neuropedagogical strategies. Brain-based
learning activities leverage multisensory, experiential, and student-centered techniques
to align instruction with how the brain learns. For example, such methods may include
movement breaks, visual-audio stimuli, and collaborative tasks designed to engage
multiple neural pathways. Metacognitive strategy training is another component: when
students are taught to plan, monitor, and evaluate their own learning (metacognition),
their awareness of cognitive processes improves and higher-order thinking skills
increase. Neuropedagogical approaches also recognize the interaction of emotion and
cognition. Brain research shows a reciprocal relationship between learners’ emotional
states and their motivation and achievement in learning. Incorporating Social-Emotional
Learning (SEL) and connecting content t
o students’ interests can thus reinforce cognitive
engagement.
Empirical studies support the effectiveness of these methods. For instance, brain-
based teaching has been shown to significantly improve students’ retention and
academic performance in science subjects. Integrating brain-friendly exercises with
explicit metacognitive prompts can further organize learning around active thinking
processes. In teacher education contexts, exposing future educators to neuropedagogical
principles is argued to deepen their understanding of learning and enhance ultimately
their teaching practice. However, specific evidence from Uzbekistan is scarce. To address
this gap, the present study tests whether a neuropedagogical training program can yield
greater gains in intellectual competence (problem-solving, critical thinking, reflective
reasoning, etc.) among Uzbek pedagogical students than traditional lecture-based
instruction.
METHODS
Sixty third-year undergraduates majoring in education at a pedagogical university
in Uzbekistan participated in the study. Students were randomly assigned to an
experimental group (n=30) or a control group (n=30). All participants completed a
standardized
Intellectual Competence Assessment
before the intervention. The assessment
measured cognitive skills such as problem-solving, analysis, creativity, and reflective
reasoning.
1.
Intervention (Experimental Group): Over a 12-week semester, the
experimental group received instruction using neuropedagogical methods. These
included brain-based learning activities (multisensory tasks, collaborative projects,
periodic movement and mind breaks), explicit metacognitive training (setting goals, self-
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
05 (2025) / ISSN 2181-1415
627
questioning prompts, and self-monitoring techniques), and integration of emotional
engagement strategies (connecting material to students’ experiences and in
terests).
2.
Control Group: The control group followed the standard curriculum with
traditional lecture and textbook activities, without the specialized neuropedagogical
elements.
3.
Measurement: At the end of the semester, both groups retook the
Intellectual Competence Assessment (post-test). A blinded rater scored all tests.
4.
Analysis: Pre- and post-test scores were compared within and between
groups. Gain scores (post-pre) were calculated for each student. We used independent-
samples
t
-tests to compare group me
ans (alpha = 0.05) and computed Cohen’s
d
for effect
size. All analyses were two-tailed.
This design follows established educational research procedures. The study
protocol was approved by the university’s ethics committee, and informed consent was
obtained from all participants.
RESULTS
Table 1 summarizes the group means and gains. At pre-test, the experimental and
control groups had comparable intellectual competence scores (52.0±9.2 vs. 47.6±6.5,
p
>0.05). After the intervention, the experimental group’s mean score rose to 65.0±12.3,
whereas the control group reached 51.7±7.7. The mean gain in the experimental group
(13.4 points) was substantially greater than in the control group (4.1 points). An
independent-samples
t
-test on gain scores confirmed that this difference was highly
significant,
t
(58)=7.70,
p
<0.001. The corresponding effect size was very large (Cohen’s
d
≈1.99), indicating a robust educational impact.
Table 1.
Intellectual competence scores (mean ± SD) in experimental and
control groups.
Group
Pre-
test (Mean ± SD)
Post-
test (Mean ± SD)
Gain
(Mean)
Experimental
52.0 ± 9.2
65.0 ± 12.3
13.4
Control
47.6 ± 6.5
51.7 ± 7.7
4.1
Narratively, these results indicate that students exposed to neuropedagogical
teaching showed markedly higher improvements in intellectual competence than their
peers in conventional classes. The experimental group’s superior post
-test performance
suggests enhanced skills in analysis, creative problem-solving, and reflective reasoning.
All differences described were statistically significant (
p
<0.001).
DISCUSSION
The findings demonstrate that neuropedagogical methods substantially
outperformed traditional instruction in developing future teachers’ intellectual
competence. This aligns with prior research on brain-based learning: for example, Bada
and Jita (2023) reported that brain-based teaching significantly enhanced secondary
students’ retention of scientific concepts. Our results extend this to higher
-order thinking
in teacher trainees. The large effect size suggests that combining brain-friendly activities
with metacognitive training creates an especially powerful learning environment.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
05 (2025) / ISSN 2181-1415
628
Metacognitive strategies likely played a key role. As reported in earlier studies,
when learners engage in self-regulation and monitoring of their thinking, their problem-
solving abilities improve. In the experimental group, instructors prompted students to
articulate their reasoning and set learning goals, which may have reinforced analytical
and critical thinking skills. This is consistent with the notion that metacognition
“provides advantages such as organizing the learning
process in terms of active thinking”.
Meanwhile, the emphasis on emotional engagement and social context (as suggested by
the principles of Social-Emotional Learning) may have increased motivation and
investment, further enhancing outcomes. Brain research shows that positive emotional
states and enriched classroom environments facilitate memory and cognition, which
could help explain why students exposed to these methods improved more.
These findings have particular relevance for Uzbekistan’s educational g
oals.
Government reforms have stressed modernizing teaching methods and fostering
creativity and critical thinking in students. By demonstrating that an explicitly
neuroscience-informed pedagogy can boost intellectual skills among prospective
teachers, this study suggests a concrete strategy for meeting those aims. Future teachers
with stronger analytical and reflective abilities are better prepared to teach similarly
competent students. In the long term, integrating neuropedagogical training into
pedagogic
al university curricula may help address national concerns (e.g. Uzbekistan’s
below-average performance on international creative-thinking assessments) by creating
a generation of educators equipped with innovative teaching strategies.
Limitations and Future Work. The study’s sample was limited to a single university
and one semester; larger multisite studies should replicate these results. We also
assessed only overall competence rather than isolating specific domains (e.g. problem-
solving vs. creativity). Future research could examine which components of
neuropedagogy (e.g. particular metacognitive prompts or emotional-support activities)
are most effective. Nonetheless, our data provide strong initial evidence that brain-based
and metacognitive approaches produce measurable gains in intellectual competence
relative to conventional teaching.
CONCLUSION
In summary, neuropedagogical instructional methods integrating brain-based
learning activities, metacognitive strategy training, and att
ention to learners’ emotional
-
cognitive dynamics
–
markedly enhance the intellectual competence of future teachers.
As Uzbekistan continues educational reform, these findings support embedding
neuroscience-informed pedagogy in teacher education programs. By doing so,
universities can help cultivate teachers with advanced critical and reflective abilities,
better aligned with 21st-century learning objectives.
REFERENCES
1.
Sotivoldiyeva S.Q.
Neuropedagogical features of teaching primary school
students to read and understand text
// Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices.
2023. Vol.21. P.31-34.
2.
Ali M.Q., Kashif N.U., Chani M.I.
Conceptual awareness about brain-based
learning and neurotheological practices at secondary level
// Global Regional Review.
2019. Vol.4, No.2. P.564-570.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
05 (2025) / ISSN 2181-1415
629
3.
Akcay B., Adiguzel S., Tiryaki A., Yavuz R.
The effect of brain-based learning
on students’ metacognitive awareness
// International Journal on Social and Education
Sciences. 2023. Vol.5, No.3. P.676-699.
4.
Bada A., Jita L.
Effect of brain-
based teaching method on students’ retention
and self-efficacy in heat energy
// Journal of Technology and Science Education. 2023.
Vol.13, No.1. P.276-287.
5.
Kayumova G.A.
Content and methods of developing intellectual competence of
future teachers of pedagogical universities
// International Journal of Education and
Pedagogy. 2023. Vol.1, No.6. P.35-41.
6.
Urinov R. Enhancing the intellectual competence of prospective teachers
through the pedagogical implementation of the design thinking approach //
Models and
Methods in Modern Science
. 2025. Vol. 4, No. 10. P. 55
–
60.
7.
Уринов
Р. Ё. Специфика англоязычной технический документации в
сфере информационных технологий //Science and innovation. International scientific.
–
Т. 1. –
№. 7.
8.
O’rinov R., Tolipov E. Bo‘lajak o‘qituvchilarning intellektual kompetentligini
innovatsion metodlar
orqali rivojlantirish //Наука и технология в современном мире.
–
2025.
–
Т. 4. –
№.
16.
–
С
. 170-173.
9.
Urinov R. Innovative communication technologies in teaching foreign
languages //Science and innovation.
–
2022.
–
Т
. 1.
–
№. B7. –
С
. 508-511.
