Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Journal home page:
https://inscience.uz/index.php/socinov/index
Theoretical foundation of the sports discourse study
Umida AZZAMOVA
Samarkand State Medical University
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received February 2024
Received in revised form
28 February 2024
Accepted 20 March 2024
Available online
15 April 2024
Currently, the focus of the world linguistics field is different,
along with topics, there is also terminology, along with various
topics. Terminology is one of the current directions of modern
linguistic research. Presently, the issue of discourse is growing,
on the one hand, of science because of the increase of new
concepts due to dynamic development on the other hand, the
process of formation, development of terms and it is related to
insufficient research of such issues as function is interpreted as
an event.
2181-
1415/©
2024 in Science LLC.
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol5-iss3/S-pp142-146
This is an open access article under the Attribution 4.0 International
(CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru)
Keywords:
communication,
discourse,
motivation,
humanities,
denotation.
Sport mavzusidagi tadqiqotlarning nazariy asoslari
ANNOTATSIYA
Kalit so‘zlar
:
aloqa,
nutq,
motivatsiya,
gumanitar fanlar,
denotatsiya.
Mazkur maqolada terminologiya haqida ma’lumotlar
berilgan. Shuningdek, fanning dinamik rivojlanishi tufayli yangi
tushunchalarning ko‘payishi, ikkinchi tomondan, atamalarning
shakllanish, rivojlanish jarayoni va bu kabi masalalarning
yetarli darajada tadqiq qilinmaganligi bilan bog‘liq muammolar
tahlil qilingan.
Теоретические основы исследования спортивного
дискурса
АННОТАЦИЯ
Ключевые слова:
общение,
дискурс,
мотивация,
гуманитарные науки,
денотат.
Современная лингвистика характеризуется разнообразием
направлений, среди которых особое внимание уделяется
терминологии в контексте различных тематик. Терминология
представляет собой одно из ключевых направлений в
современных лингвистических исследованиях. В настоящее
1
Samarkand State Medical University.
2
Samarkand State Medical University.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
03 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
143
время
актуализируется
проблематика
дискурса,
обусловленная, с одной стороны, появлением новых понятий
на фоне динамичного развития наук, с другой стороны,
процессами формирования и эволюции терминологии, что
связано с недостаточной проработкой данных вопросов. В
таком контексте функция термина интерпретируется как
ключевое событие в дискурсе.
The Concept of Discourse is a generalization of the notion of a conversation to any
form of communication. It is a major topic in social theory, with work spanning fields
such as sociology, anthropology, continental philosophy, and discourse analysis.
Following pioneering work by Michel Foucault, these fields view discourse as a system of
thought, knowledge, or communication that constructs our experience of the world. Since
control of discourse amounts to control of how the world is perceived, social theory often
studies discourse as a window into power. Within theoretical linguistics, discourse is
understood more narrowly as linguistic information exchange and was one of the major
motivations for the framework of dynamic semantics, in which expressions' denotation
are equated with their ability to update a discourse context. In the humanities and social
sciences, discourse describes a formal way of thinking that can be expressed through
language. Discourse is a social boundary that defines what statements can be said about a
topic. Many definitions of discourse are largely derived from the work of French
philosopher Michel Foucault. In sociology, discourse is defined as "any practice (found in
a wide range of forms) by which individuals imbue reality with meaning".
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To date, the science of linguistics has made significant progress in the study of
problems related to all levels (phonological, morphological, syntactic) of the language.
Studies devoted to the study of the text and its nature began to appear in the middle of
the 20th century.
Today, the answers given by linguists to the questions of the status of the text, its
place in the language system, and where to start in the linguistic analysis of the text are
not very consistent. For example, sometimes we come across different opinions on the
issue of determining the status of the text. We can also meet different points of view on
the issues of what is the nature of signs of the text, whether the text should be called a
speech process or whether the text should be interpreted as the result of the speech
process, whether the text should be studied in connection with oral speech or written
speech.
The issues of text linguistics have attracted the attention of many linguists.
Including V. Matezius, F. Danesh, V. Dressler, P. Hartman, I. Kovtunova, I. Galperin,
K. Gauzenblas, N. Pospe'ov, T. Silman, N. Shvedova, K. Solganik, L. Foreign linguists such
as Loseva, O. Moskatskaya, K. Abdullayev, N. Navro'zova put forth brilliant ideas about
the text category.
The issue of whether the text is a speech category is directly related to the
concepts of "speech process itself" and "result of speech activity". The Czech scientist
K. Gauzenblas interprets the text as an oral speech process both as a speech activity and
as a product of speech activity.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
03 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
144
LR. According to Galperini, the text is a product of written speech, and oral speech
includes various repetitions and long sentences, and it is not appropriate to recognize it
as a text that can be read by a child.
Questions such as whether text analysis should be studied in syntax or stylistics, or
whether a new field called "text linguistics" should be scientifically based, have also
caused some debates in science.
Until the 60s of the last century, sentence syntax was the highest level of linguistic
analysis. it was considered that linguistic research was completed with sentence analysis.
The text consisting of the content and structural integrity of a few sentences could not be
subjected to scientific analysis.
It is known that the sentence is the highest unit of the language. But speech is one
of the smallest units in the speech process. That is why it is appropriate to interpret the
sentence as a building material of the text.
DISCUSSION
In world linguistics, a number of ideas about the text and its linguistic nature have
been put forward. French linguist R. Barthes says: "Any fragment of speech that is
internally connected and consists of sentences connected with each other for the purpose
of communication is called a text." In this, he focuses on what the author is talking about
and not on its content, but on the components of this text.
In the studies of K. Kozhevnikova, the main attention is paid to the fact that the text
is a product of connected speech, and it is taught separately that it is complete in terms of
content. The scientist's opinion that text components are related both semantically and
grammatically is noteworthy, because most linguists emphasize that text components are
only semantically related, and their lexical- they ignore the connection through
grammatical means.
Another Czech linguist, Jan Korjensky, interpreted the text semantically and
connects with the concepts of pragmatic component. In this case, the semantic
component is primarily textual material in the base of organizing meaning and ensuring
its realization believes that it consists of tools. Scientist is a semantic component it also
includes the speaker, that is, the human factor. Pragmatic component means importance
in the system of meaning expression understand different relationships.
German linguist K. Ye. Haydolf the text communicative the linking together of a
sentence in a process to convey a particular message interprets in the style of the text,
and the order of the sentence in the text the following should be taken into account when
connecting emphasizes: a) integrity of thought; b) lexical integrity; c) communicative
wholeness; g) totalities of time and point of view.
Russian scientist M.V. Lyapon described the text according to the following four
signs shows that it can be based on:
1. The text is the result of the interrelationship of the sentence is a message.
For the text researcher, in the study of linguistic phenomena, one is the source.
2. The text is the realization of the speaking ability of the dictionary; is a tool. In
this process, the text is the real use of language in speech also serves as a supporting
space.
3. The text is the product of the speaker's active speech activity.
4. The text is the highest level of the language system that performs an important
function in the communicative process.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
03 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
145
M.V. Lyapon is the most important human factor in text formation that one of the
factors is that a person is a living source for the formation of text states that.
Since the 90s of last year, Uzbek scientists have also written began to deal with
theoretical problems of linguistics. In this regard, B. Orinboyev, R. Kongurov, J. Lapasov
said that "Artistic Textbook Linguistic Analysis" is of particular importance earns. Here
are the types of text, both general and specific signs, methodological principles of
linguistic analysis of the text, text creation problems, the choice of means of expression
and the text of the connection information about current issues such as its role in the
structure is given.
When it comes to text research in Uzbek linguistics, M. Tokhsanov's "Microtext and
Uzbek artistic speech". candidate work on the topic of means of expressing coherence it
should be noted.
A. Mamajonov's textbook "Text Linguistics" published in 1989 is notable for being
the first textbook devoted to this issue. This study guide covers a number of issues such
as theoretical issues of the text, its status, units, types of text, text components, means of
connecting text components.
In M. Hakimov's candidate's thesis on "Syntagmatic and pragmatic features of
Uzbek scientific text", the scientific style of the Uzbek language was studied from the
aspect of the text category, and the syntagmatic and pragmatic features of the scientific
text related to the humanities were revealed.
The exotic lexicon of religious texts in the Uzbek language was the research object
of researcher N. Ulugov's candidate thesis. N. Ulugov tries to prove his opinion that
religious text should be studied as a separate type of text in linguistics on the basis of
exotic lexical materials.
Prof. In E. Qilichev's textbook "Linguistic analysis of the text" (2000), examples of
the text and its linguistic analysis are given. Most importantly, the work includes
examples of reading and analyzing poetic and prose texts and studying the text "under a
linguistic microscope".
Texts of lectures on this subject were also published by N. Tumiyozov and
B. Yoldoshev, and extensive information was given about the important concepts of the
subject. In this manual, this work created by N. Tumiyozov, B. Yoldoshevlam was widely
used to cover some topics.
CONCLUSION
It is known that pragmatics, as a new theoretical and practical branch of linguistics,
is a speech process that embodies human social activity; investigates issues related to the
communicative intention of the speech participants, manifested by the influence of the
speech situation. M. Hakimov's research is of particular importance in the formation of
linguistic pragmatics in Uzbek linguistics. His doctoral dissertation on the topic
"Pragmatic interpretation of text in Uzbek language" was a worthy contribution to the
development of text linguistics in Uzbek philology.
REFERENCES:
1. Shv
а
yk
о
V.D. Lingv
о
stilistich
е
ski
е о
s
о
b
е
nn
о
sti fr
а
z
ео
l
о
gich
е
ski
х е
dinis
о
br
а
z
о
v
а
nni
х о
t sv
е
rsl
о
vni
х
sp
о
rtivni
х
t
е
rmin
о
v i pr
о
f
е
ssi
о
n
а
lizm
о
v (n
а
m
а
t
е
ri
а
l
е
s
о
vr
е
m
е
nn
о
g
о а
ngliysk
о
g
о
y
а
zik
а):
Diss
k
а
nd. fil
о
l. n
а
uk.
–
M.,1984.
–
290 s
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
03 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
146
2.
Pоpоv R.V. Russkаyа spоrtivnаyа tеrminоlоgiyа: Nа mаtеriаlе bаskеtbоlinоy
tеrminоsistеmi: Disskаnd.filоl.nаuk –Sеvеrоdvinsk, 2003. –
168 s.;
3.
Jаlilоvа А. Jismоniy tаrbiyа vа spоrt tаriхi fаni bо'yichа mа'ruzаlаr mаtni. –
T.,
2015.
–
B.12
–
15.
4.
Jeаn
-
Frаnçоis Sаblаyrоlles. Mаis que fоnt les linguistes? Les sciences du lаngаge,
vingt аns аprès, аctes ducоllоque 2003 de l'Аssоciаtiоn des sciences du lаngаge.
Аssоciаtiоn des sciences du lаngаge. Frаnce, Christine
5.
Jаcquet
-
Pfаu, Jeаn
-
Frаnçоis Sаblаyrоlles. Pаris: l'Hаrmаttаn, DL 2005. –
R. 33.
6.
Dаuzаt Аlbert (s.d.), Nоuveаu dictiоnnаire étymоlоgique et histоrique, Pаris,
Lаrоusse, 1971. –
P. 709.
7.
О'zbеk tilining izоhli lugʻаti:
–
T.: "О'zbеkistоn milliy ensiklоpеdiyаsi", 2006.
-680
b.3 jild 566 b
8.
Slоvаr russkоgо yаzikа: 20
-
е izdаniе., M.:1988. 750 s. –
618 s. 10
9. T. A. van Dijk. Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1987.
–
Р 98
-117.
10. T. A. van Dijk. Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse and Society, 5,
1995.
–
P 243
–
289.
11. Weitzman P. F., Weitzman E. A. Promoting communication with older adults:
Protocol for resolving interpersonal conflicts and for enhancing interactions with
doctors”.
Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 2003.
–
P 523
–
535.
12. Welch Cline, R. At the intersection of micro and macro: Opportunities and
challenges for physician
–patient communication research”.
Patient Education and
Counseling, 50, 2003.
–
P 13
–
16.
13. West C., Zimmerman D. Doing gender // The Social Construction of Gender
(pp.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1991. -P 3
–
29.
14. Wodk R. Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on
Language and Social Interaction, 32, 1999.
–
P 185
–
193.
15. Wodak R. Discourse and racism: European perspectives. Annual Review of
Anthropology, 28, 1999.
–
P 175
–
199.
16. Yorova S. K., Khakberdiyeva V. J. K. DOCTOR AND PATIENT / /Scientific
progress.
–
2021.
–
Т
. 2.
–
№. 1. –
С
. 1478-1480.
Yorova S., Nasimova S. The ways of teaching languages at medical institutions.
–
2019.
17. Yorova
S. K. The concept “health” in the English lingual culture //Humanities
and Social Sciences in Europe: Achievements and Perspectives.
–
2017.
–
С
. 58-60.
18. Karimovna Y. S. STRATEGIC METHODS OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK MEDICAL
DISCOURSES //Thematics Journal of Education.
–
2022.
–
Т
. 7.
–
№.
19. Askarovich B. S. et al. TEACHING MATH IN ENGLISH TO
20.
UNIVERSITIES AND INSTITUTIONS’STUDENTS FOR TAKING GMAT CERTIFICATE
//Journal of Positive School Psychology.
–
2022.
–
С
. 1600
–
1604-1600
–
1604.
21. Karimovna Y. S. The linguistic environment in the field of medical communications
//Eurasian Journal of Academic Research.
–
2022.
–
Т
. 2.
–
№. 2. –
С
. 143-147.
22. Karimovna Y. S. Social-cultural Characteristics of Uzbek and English Medical
Speech //International Journal on Integrated Education.
–
Т
. 4.
–
№. 5. –
С
. 294-298.
23. Karimovna Y. S. Medicine and Education faculty Samarkand State Medical
Institute.
