Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Journal home page:
https://inscience.uz/index.php/socinov/index
Development of bilateral and multilateral investment
agreements
Jaloliddin RAKHMONOV
1
Tashkent State University of Law
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received July 2024
Received in revised form
15 August 2024
Accepted 25 August 2024
Available online
15 September 2024
The development of bilateral and multilateral investment
agreements has been pivotal in shaping the global economic
landscape by promoting cross-border investments and providing
legal protections for investors. Bilateral Investment Treaties
(BITs) have traditionally focused on safeguarding investor rights
between two countries, thereby fostering foreign direct
investment. However, the increasing complexity of global trade
has prompted a shift towards Multilateral Investment Treaties
(MITs), which offer more comprehensive frameworks that
address broader issues such as environmental sustainability,
labor rights, and public policy concerns. Striking a balance
between investor protection and the need for sustainable
development remains a key challenge as these agreements
continue to evolve.
2181-
1415/© 2024 in Science LLC.
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol5-iss8/S-pp264-269
This is an open access article under the Attribution 4.0 International
(CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru)
Keywords:
bilateral Investment
Treaties (BITs),
Multilateral Investment
Treaties (MITs),
foreign direct investment
(FDI),
investor protection,
legal frameworks,
cross-border investment,
international economic law.
Ikki
tomonlama va ko‘p tomonlama investitsiya
bitimlarining rivojlanishi
ANNOTATSIYA
Kalit so‘zlar:
Ikki tomonlama investitsion
shartnomalar (BITs),
ko'p tomonlama investitsiya
shartnomalari (MITs),
to'g'ridan-to'g'ri xorijiy
investitsiyalar (FDI),
investorlarni himoya qilish,
qonunchilik asoslari,
Ikki tomonlama va ko
‘
p tomonlama investitsiya bitimlarining
rivojlanishi global iqtisodiy landshaftni shakllantirishda muhim
ahamiyatga ega bo
‘
lib, transchegaraviy investitsiyalarni
rivojlantirish va investorlar uchun huquqiy himoyani
ta'minlashga xizmat qiladi. Ikki tomonlama investitsiya bitimlari
(BIT) an'anaviy ravishda ikki mamlakat o
‘
rtasida investorlar
huquqlarini himoya qilishga qaratilgan bo
‘
lib, bevosita xorijiy
investitsiyalarni rag
‘
batlantirishga yordam bergan. Ammo global
1
Lecturer, Department of International Law and Human Rights, Tashkent State University of Law.
E-mail: jaloliddin.rakhmanov@gmail.com
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
08 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
265
transchegaraviy
investitsiyalar,
xalqaro iqtisodiy huquq
savdoning tobora murakkablashishi ko
‘
p tomonlama investitsiya
bitimlariga (MIT) o
‘
tishga olib keldi, ular ekologik barqarorlik,
mehnat huquqlari va davlat siyosati masalalari kabi kengroq
muammolarni qamrab oladigan ko
‘
proq kompleks huquqiy
me
’
yoriy asoslarni taklif qiladi. Investorlarni himoya qilish va
barqaror rivojlanish zarurati o
‘
rtasida muvozanatni topish
ushbu bitimlarning rivojlanish jarayonidagi asosiy vazifa bo
‘
lib
qolmoqda.
Разработка
двусторонних
и
многосторонних
инвестиционных соглашений
АННОТАЦИЯ
Ключевые слова:
Двусторонние
инвестиционные
договоры (ДИД),
многосторонние
инвестиционные
договоры (МИД),
прямые иностранные
инвестиции (ПИИ),
защита инвесторов,
правовые рамки,
трансграничные
инвестиции,
международное
экономическое право
.
Разработка
двусторонних
и
многосторонних
инвестиционных соглашений сыграла ключевую роль в
формировании глобального экономического ландшафта,
поощряя трансграничные инвестиции и предоставляя
правовую
защиту
инвесторам.
Двусторонние
инвестиционные договоры (ДИД) традиционно были
ориентированы на защиту прав инвесторов между двумя
странами, способствуя привлечению прямых иностранных
инвестиций. Однако с ростом сложности мировой торговли
наблюдается переход к многосторонним инвестиционным
договорам (МИД), которые предлагают более комплексные
рамки, охватывающие такие важные аспекты, как
экологическая
устойчивость,
трудовые
права
и
государственная политика. По мере развития этих
соглашений основной задачей остаётся достижение баланса
между защитой инвесторов и необходимостью обеспечения
устойчивого развития.
INTRODUCTION
Investment agreements have been pivotal in shaping the architecture of global
economic relationships, serving as essential tools for promoting and safeguarding
international investments. By offering protection to investors and fostering cross-border
capital flows, these agreements have contributed significantly to the economic growth of
both developed and developing nations. Over the decades, the structure and nature of
these agreements have evolved in response to the changing needs of global markets,
regulatory environments, and the demands of state sovereignty.
The two primary forms of investment agreements
—
Bilateral Investment Treaties
(BITs)
and
Multilateral Investment Treaties (MITs)
—
are particularly reflective of the
complexities and dynamics of international economic law. These treaties not only establish
the legal framework that encourages foreign direct investment (FDI) but also provide
crucial mechanisms for resolving disputes and protecting investor rights. BITs, for
example, tend to focus on the relationship between two individual states, providing
tailored agreements that account for the unique legal and economic conditions of each.
MITs, on the other hand, involve multiple states and aim to harmonize investment
standards across regions or globally [1].
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
08 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
266
Though both BITs and MITs share common goals
—
such as creating a stable and
predictable environment for international investors
—
they differ significantly in terms of
their scope, enforcement mechanisms, and the interests they seek to balance. BITs often
cater to the specific bilateral interests of the contracting states, while MITs must navigate
the broader interests of multiple nations, making their negotiation and implementation
more complex. Additionally, the enforcement of BITs typically relies on investor-state
dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, allowing investors to bring claims directly against
host states. In contrast, multilateral agreements often include more sophisticated
mechanisms to address disputes, and they may incorporate other areas of international
law, such as environmental or labor standards, making them more comprehensive but also
more challenging to enforce uniformly.
These differences underscore the dynamic and evolving nature of investment
agreements, as they must adapt to shifting economic priorities, the increasing influence of
global governance frameworks, and the growing emphasis on sustainability and fair-trade
practices in international economic law.
MAIN PART
A
Bilateral Investment Treaty
is a legal agreement between two countries aimed
at protecting investments made by investors from either state in the other's territory. The
development of BITs can be traced back to the post-World War II period, when European
countries began negotiating such agreements to protect their investments abroad. The
first BIT was signed between Germany and Pakistan in 1959, and the number of BITs
exploded in the subsequent decades, particularly during the 1990s, as many developing
countries sought foreign investment to stimulate growth [2].
The key features of BITs include:
1.
Investor Protection
: BITs provide protection against expropriation, ensuring
that governments cannot nationalize or seize investors' assets without proper
compensation.
2.
Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET)
: This standard ensures that investors are
treated fairly and are not discriminated against.
3.
Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
: Most BITs include provisions for
international arbitration, allowing investors to bring claims directly against the host state
before international tribunals, such as the International Centre for Settlement of
Investment Disputes (ICSID).
4.
Promotion of Investment
: BITs often include provisions that aim to promote
investment between the contracting parties by reducing political and legal risks [3].
BITs have been instrumental in fostering foreign direct investment (FDI), especially
for developing nations that seek to attract international capital by providing a legal
framework that reassures investors. However, over time, these treaties have faced
criticism for disproportionately favoring the interests of investors, often at the expense of
public policy goals such as environmental protection, labor rights, and public health [4].
Multilateral Investment Agreements (MITs)
Multilateral Investment Agreements
aim to regulate investment on a broader,
often global, scale. Unlike BITs, which are bilateral in nature, MITs involve multiple
countries and create a unified framework for investment governance. The development of
multilateral agreements has been more complex, largely due to the differing priorities and
economic capacities of participating countries [5].
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
08 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
267
Historically, efforts to establish a comprehensive multilateral investment
agreement have encountered significant obstacles. For instance, the
Multilateral
Agreement on Investment (MAI)
, negotiated under the auspices of the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in the 1990s, ultimately failed due to
disagreements over the balance between investor protection and the preservation of state
sovereignty. Critics, especially from developing countries, argued that the proposed
agreement would limit their ability to regulate in the public interest, while giving excessive
rights to foreign investors [6].
However, the desire for multilateral regulation did not disappear. Instead, regional
and sector-specific agreements have emerged, with
Trade and Investment Framework
Agreements (TIFAs)
and
Investment Chapters
in regional trade agreements becoming
more common. A prominent example of a multilateral investment agreement is the
investment chapter within the
Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-
Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)
, which establishes investment rules among its 11 member
countries. Another example is the investment chapter in the
United States-Mexico-
Canada Agreement (USMCA)
[7].
Multilateral agreements have several advantages over bilateral ones:
1.
Harmonization of Standards
: MITs help standardize investment rules across
multiple countries, reducing the complexity for multinational companies operating in
several jurisdictions.
2.
Broader Scope
: Since MITs involve multiple countries, they have the potential to
create more consistent and predictable investment environments globally.
3.
Enhanced Cooperation
: By bringing together a wide array of countries,
multilateral agreements can encourage greater cooperation on cross-border investment
issues [8].
Nevertheless, multilateral agreements can also be more difficult to negotiate, as they
must reconcile the competing interests of many stakeholders. The slow pace of
negotiations and the rise of nationalist and protectionist sentiments in recent years have
made it harder to achieve large-scale multilateral agreements [9].
The development of both BITs and MITs has been shaped by several emerging
trends and challenges in recent years:
1.
Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
: The ISDS mechanism, a
core feature of many BITs, has come under increasing scrutiny. Critics argue that it allows
corporations to bypass national courts and challenge legitimate public policies, leading to
a surge in efforts to reform ISDS or replace it with alternative mechanisms. The European
Union, for example, has proposed an
Investment Court System (ICS)
to replace
traditional ISDS in its agreements.
2.
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
: As countries increasingly focus on
achieving the United Nations’ SDGs, there is a growing push to incorporate sustainable
development provisions into investment agreements. This includes balancing investor
rights with commitments to environmental protection, labor standards, and human rights.
3.
Shift to Regionalism
: With the difficulties of achieving global consensus on
multilateral agreements, many countries have turned to regional investment agreements.
These agreements allow for tailored solutions to the specific needs of the region, as seen
in the CPTPP or the
African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)
[10].
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
08 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
268
CONCLUSION
The development of bilateral and multilateral investment agreements reflects the
continuously evolving needs and complexities of the global economy. As international
trade and investment have expanded, these agreements have adapted to provide a legal
and regulatory framework that facilitates and protects cross-border investments. Bilateral
Investment Treaties (BITs), which have been instrumental in fostering international
capital flows, have traditionally offered legal protections to investors, such as protection
against expropriation and access to impartial dispute resolution mechanisms. These
treaties have been particularly significant in promoting foreign direct investment (FDI) in
developing countries by reducing the perceived risks for international investors.
However, as global trade has become more interconnected and multilayered, the
limitations of BITs in addressing broader economic, social, and environmental concerns
have become more apparent. This has led to a growing shift towards Multilateral
Investment Treaties (MITs) and other regional or plurilateral agreements, which offer
more comprehensive and coordinated frameworks to regulate global investment flows.
Unlike BITs, which focus on the relationship between two countries, MITs aim to
harmonize investment standards across multiple jurisdictions, creating a more consistent
and predictable environment for international investors. They also address broader issues
such as environmental sustainability, labor rights, and corporate social responsibility,
reflecting the modern priorities of global governance.
As these agreements continue to evolve, it becomes increasingly crucial to strike a
delicate balance between investor protection and public policy considerations.
Governments must ensure that these treaties provide adequate legal safeguards to
encourage investment while also preserving their ability to regulate in the public interest.
Issues such as environmental protection, human rights, and sustainable development
goals (SDGs) must be carefully integrated into investment agreements to ensure that
economic growth is inclusive and benefits all parties involved, including local communities
and future generations. Ultimately, the challenge lies in creating investment agreements
that not only promote economic prosperity but also contribute to the long-term well-being
and sustainability of the global economy.
REFERENCES:
1. Sacerdoti G. Bilateral treaties and multilateral instruments on investment
protection.
–
Nijhoff, 1997.
–
Т. 269.
2. Chalamish E. The future of bilateral investment treaties: A de facto multilateral
agreement //Brook. J. Int'l L.
–
2008.
–
Т. 34. –
С. 303.
3. Canner S. J. The multilateral agreement on investment //Cornell Int'l LJ.
–
1998.
–
Т. 31. –
С. 657.
4. Salacuse J. W. BIT by BIT: The growth of bilateral investment treaties and their
impact on foreign investment in developing countries //The International Lawyer.
–
1990.
–
С. 655
-675.
5. Neumayer E., Spess L. Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct
investment to developing countries? //World development.
–
2005.
–
Т. 33. –
№. 10. –
С.
1567-1585.
6. Lowenfeld A. F. Investment agreements and international law //Colum. J.
Transnat'l L.
–
2003.
–
Т. 42. –
С. 123.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
08 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
269
7. Bernardini P. Investment protection under bilateral investment treaties and
investment contracts //The Journal of World Investment & Trade.
–
2001.
–
Т. 2. –
№. 2. –
С. vii
-247.
8. Srur M. A. The International Investment Regime: Towards Evolutionary Bilateral
& (and) Regional Investment Treaties //Manchester J. Int'l Econ. L.
–
2004.
–
Т. 1. –
С. 54.
9. Agrawal K. Bilateral investment treaties: a developing history //Jindal Global
Law Review.
–
2016.
–
Т. 7. –
№. 2. –
С. 175
-199.
10. Geiger R. Towards a multilateral agreement on investment //Cornell Int'l LJ.
–
1998.
–
Т. 31. –
С. 467.
