SOLUTION OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMY
International scientific-online conference
62
DIGITAL SUBJECTIVITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN THE AGE OF
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sitora Abdusattarova Fakhriddin qizi
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor at Tashkent State University of Law,
Doctoral candidate (DSc) at the National University of Uzbekistan
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15797473
Abstract:
Amid the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, not only
the institutions and governance mechanisms are undergoing transformation, but
also the very concept of personality, identity, and social status. Digital
subjectivity is becoming a key category of analysis in the philosophy of
technology, law, and social sciences. This study focuses on examining the
phenomenon of digital identity and individual subjectivity in the context of
automated control, algorithmic governance, and platform dependency. A
conceptual model for assessing digital subjectivity is proposed, taking into
account ethical, legal, and cultural factors, especially in the context of emerging
digital policies in Uzbekistan.
Keywords:
artificial intelligence, digital subjectivity, identity, autonomy,
digital rights, platform, Uzbekistan
The modern era, marked by the widespread integration of AI and digital
platforms, generates new forms of presence and interaction of individuals in the
sociotechnical environment. Unlike the traditional understanding of the
individual as an autonomous subject with rights and responsibilities, the digital
personality (or subject) is determined not so much by biographical
characteristics as by data aggregates, digital traces, behavioral profiles, and
algorithmic interpretations. Thus, the digital identity becomes a result of multi-
layered information processing, where identity is constructed not only by the
individual but also by technological systems capable of self-learning and
prediction. This fundamentally changes not only self-perception but also
traditional legal and philosophical approaches to rights, responsibility, and
identification. New dilemmas arise: Can a digital avatar represent an individual
in the legal field? How can one protect a digital reputation if it is formed
automatically and without the individual’s consent? These questions demand a
fundamental revision of the concept of subject in the digital transformation of
society.
Digital subjectivity is not merely a virtual representation of the person, but
a new type of relationship between the individual, technology, and social
institutions. In the digital environment, the subject becomes the object of data
SOLUTION OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMY
International scientific-online conference
63
collection, analysis, and prediction, which raises threats of deindividualization,
loss of control over personal information, and the shifting of responsibility to
algorithmic systems.
The methodology of this research is interdisciplinary and includes
philosophical analysis of subjectivity and identity, legal examination of digital
rights and regulatory mechanisms, and empirical observation of digitalization
processes in Uzbekistan. Emphasis is placed on correlating universal ethical and
legal principles with local realities: cultural norms, mental attitudes, and stages
of institutional digital transformation.
The primary thematic and methodological foci of this research encompass a
comprehensive set of analytical dimensions aimed at unpacking the multifaceted
phenomenon of digital subjectivity. These key areas of analysis include:
Philosophical and legal reflection on subjectivity in the digital
context:
This area involves a critical examination of how foundational concepts
such as autonomy, free will, and responsibility are transformed within the
framework of digital technologies and artificial intelligence. Philosophically, the
classical notion of the autonomous subject as a self-determining agent is
challenged by AI systems that increasingly mediate decision-making processes.
The interplay between human agency and algorithmic influence raises profound
questions about the limits of individual freedom and the nature of moral
responsibility. Legally, this transformation demands a rethinking of rights and
duties in the digital sphere, where subjectivity is fragmented across virtual
identities, data profiles, and algorithmic predictions. Issues such as
accountability for decisions made or influenced by AI, the protection of digital
rights, and the extension of legal personhood to digital entities come to the fore.
This reflection also entails grappling with the ethical implications of delegating
autonomous functions to machines and ensuring that digital subjectivity does
not lead to dehumanization or loss of personal sovereignty. The challenge is to
develop normative frameworks that uphold human dignity and agency while
recognizing the increasingly intertwined relationship between humans and
intelligent technologies.
Algorithmic identity:
analyzing the complex mechanisms underlying the
formation of digital personas, which encompass the creation and continuous
evolution of behavioral models, intricate digital profiling techniques, and
advanced predictive analytics systems. This process involves gathering vast
amounts of data generated through user interactions across multiple digital
platforms, including social media, e-commerce, and communication networks.
SOLUTION OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMY
International scientific-online conference
64
The behavioral models attempt to capture not only observable actions but also
latent preferences, tendencies, and social affiliations, which are then utilized to
generate comprehensive digital profiles. These profiles serve as dynamic
representations of an individual's online presence and are increasingly used by
AI systems to anticipate future behaviors, preferences, and decision-making
patterns. Predictive analytics leverage machine learning algorithms to identify
trends and potential outcomes, often operating as black-box systems with
limited transparency. The implications of such algorithmic constructions raise
critical concerns about privacy, autonomy, manipulation, and the potential
reinforcement of existing social biases. Furthermore, the evolving nature of
digital identity complicates traditional notions of personal continuity and legal
recognition, demanding innovative approaches in law, ethics, and social policy to
safeguard individuals in the digital age.
Legal regulation of digital subjectivity:
This section delves deeply into
the multifaceted challenges of legal identification in the digital realm,
encompassing the use and reliability of digital signatures, the integration of
biometric data for authentication purposes, and comprehensive data protection
frameworks. It critically examines the evolving international standards, such as
the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), highlighting their principles of
consent, transparency, data minimization, and individual rights. Additionally,
the discussion extends to the complexities of local adaptations of these norms
within diverse legal systems, with particular emphasis on the legislative and
regulatory landscape in Uzbekistan. The analysis underscores the need for
coherent legal mechanisms that can address issues of identity verification, data
sovereignty, cross-border data flows, and the accountability of AI systems. It also
explores the tension between enabling technological innovation and
safeguarding individual privacy, proposing pathways to harmonize global ethical
standards with culturally and legally specific requirements. This comprehensive
legal perspective aims to ensure that digital subjectivity is protected and
recognized within both national and international juridical frameworks, thus
fostering trust and legitimacy in the digital ecosystem.
The results of the study show that digital subjectivity emerges as a complex
phenomenon at the intersection of technology, law, and philosophy. In
Uzbekistan, where digitalization is advancing rapidly, it is especially important
to develop mechanisms for recognizing and protecting digital identity. This
includes adapting international standards, creating national AI legislation, and
enhancing guarantees of personal autonomy and digital inclusion.
SOLUTION OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMY
International scientific-online conference
65
Based on the analysis, a model for normative support of digital subjectivity
is proposed, including:
recognition of the digital profile as an extension of legal personality;
implementation of transparency and accountability principles in
algorithmic systems;
development of public digital legal literacy;
culturally sensitive adaptation of AI ethics.
Thus, the protection and development of digital subjectivity become
integral to the country’s digital sovereignty and the sustainable development of
the digital society. For Uzbekistan, this means fostering active dialogue between
the state, society, experts, and technology developers
References:
1.
Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping
human reality. Oxford University Press.
2.
Nemitz, P. (2018). Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of
artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 31(4), 511–538.
3.
Kuznetsova, T. E. (2021). Digital identity of the individual in the context of
AI
development.
Filosofskie
nauki,
10,
123–132.
https://doi.org/10.21146/1560-9596-2021-10-123-132
