The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
1
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
1-16
10.37547/tajabe/Volume07Issue08-01
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
26 june 2025
ACCEPTED
29 July 2025
PUBLISHED
01august2025
VOLUME
Vol.07 Issue08 2025
CITATION
Dr. Nourhan M. El-Sharkawy, & Prof. Latha S. Ramaswamy. (2025). Copper
Oxide Nanoparticles in Agricultural Sustainability: Innovations and
Applications in Agro-Nanotechnology. The American Journal of Agriculture
and Biomedical Engineering, 7(8), 1
–
16. Retrieved from
https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe/article/view/6496
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Copper Oxide
Nanoparticles in
Agricultural Sustainability:
Innovations and
Applications in Agro-
Nanotechnology
Dr. Nourhan M. El-Sharkawy
Agricultural Nanotechnology Research Center, Ain Shams
University, Cairo, Egypt
Prof. Latha S. Ramaswamy
Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Tamil Nadu
Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, India
Abstract:
The escalating global population necessitates
a paradigm shift in agricultural practices to ensure food
security while minimizing environmental impact.
Traditional farming methods often rely on excessive
chemical inputs, leading to soil degradation, water
pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. Agro-
nanotechnology, a burgeoning field, offers innovative
solutions
to
these
challenges
by
leveraging
nanomaterials to enhance crop productivity and
resource efficiency. Among these, copper oxide
nanoparticles (CuO NPs) have garnered significant
attention due to their multifaceted applications as nano-
fertilizers, nano-pesticides, and soil amendments. This
comprehensive review explores the recent advances
and diverse applications of CuO NPs in sustainable
farming. We delve into various synthesis methods,
emphasizing green chemistry approaches, and critically
examine their mechanisms of action in promoting plant
growth, enhancing nutrient uptake, and providing
robust protection against a spectrum of plant pathogens
and pests. Furthermore, the article addresses the crucial
environmental interactions of CuO NPs within soil and
aquatic systems, considering factors such as pH, organic
matter, and their potential ecotoxicity. While
highlighting the immense promise of CuO NPs for
revolutionizing agricultural sustainability, this review
also discusses the inherent challenges, including
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
2
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
concerns regarding long-term environmental fate,
bioaccumulation, and regulatory frameworks. By
synthesizing current knowledge, this article aims to
provide a foundational understanding for researchers
and agricultural practitioners, guiding the responsible
development and deployment of CuO NPs for a more
productive, resilient, and environmentally sound
agricultural future.
Keywords:
Copper
Oxide
Nanoparticles,
Agro-
Nanotechnology, Agricultural Sustainability, Nano-
Fertilizers, Nano-Pesticides, Crop Protection, Soil
Amendment, Nanomaterials, Sustainable Farming, Plant
Disease Management.
Introduction:
The global population is projected to reach
9.7 billion by 2050, placing immense pressure on
agricultural systems to produce more food, fiber, and
fuel with dwindling resources and under the increasing
threat of climate change [United Nations 2015].
Conventional agricultural practices, characterized by
intensive use of synthetic fertilizers and chemical
pesticides, have significantly boosted yields but often at
a considerable environmental cost. These include soil
degradation, water contamination, loss of biodiversity,
and increased greenhouse gas emissions [Broberg et al.
2017; Liu et al. 2023]. The challenge for modern
agriculture is to transition towards sustainable farming
systems that can meet the growing demand for food
while simultaneously protecting natural resources and
mitigating environmental impacts.
Nanotechnology, the manipulation of matter on an
atomic, molecular, and supramolecular scale (1-100
nanometers), has emerged as a transformative discipline
with profound implications across various sectors,
including agriculture [Singh et al. 2021; Wani and Kothari
2018]. Agro-nanotechnology, specifically, involves the
application of nanomaterials and nanodevices to
agricultural production, processing, and food safety
[Saritha et al. 2022]. This field offers novel solutions to
enhance crop productivity, improve nutrient use
efficiency, provide targeted pest and disease
management, and reduce the environmental footprint of
farming [Gupta et al. 2023]. The unique properties of
nanoparticles, such as their high surface-to-volume ratio,
quantum effects, and tunable reactivity, enable them to
interact with biological systems in ways that bulk
materials cannot, leading to enhanced efficacy at lower
concentrations [Singh et al. 2021; Kah and Kookana
2017].
Among the diverse array of nanomaterials, metal oxide
nanoparticles have gained considerable attention for
their potential in agriculture. Copper oxide nanoparticles
(CuO NPs) are particularly promising due to copper's
essential role as a micronutrient for plants and its well-
known antimicrobial properties [Francis et al. 2024; Balu
et al. 2023]. Copper is vital for various physiological
processes
in
plants,
including
photosynthesis,
respiration, and enzyme activation [Adhikari et al. 2016].
Furthermore, copper compounds have a long history of
use as fungicides and bactericides in agriculture [Servin
et al. 2015]. By reducing copper to the nanoscale, its
bioavailability and reactivity are significantly altered,
potentially leading to enhanced efficacy as a nutrient
source and a more potent antimicrobial agent, often at
lower dosages compared to conventional copper-based
agrochemicals [Liu et al. 2023; Balu et al. 2023].
This article provides a comprehensive review of the
recent advances and diverse applications of copper
oxide-based nanoparticles in agro-nanotechnology,
focusing on their contributions to sustainable farming.
We will explore the various methods used for their
synthesis, with a particular emphasis on environmentally
friendly "green" approaches. The review will then delve
into the specific applications of CuO NPs as nano-
fertilizers for enhancing crop growth and nutrient
uptake, and as nano-pesticides/fungicides for effective
pest and disease management. Crucially, we will also
address the critical aspect of their environmental
interactions and fate within agricultural ecosystems,
considering factors that influence their stability,
mobility, and potential ecotoxicity. Finally, we will
discuss the broader implications, challenges, and future
research directions for the responsible and widespread
adoption of CuO NPs in sustainable agriculture.
2. Methodology
This review employed a systematic literature search and
analysis approach to identify, synthesize, and critically
evaluate research pertaining to copper oxide-based
nanoparticles in agro-nanotechnology. The objective was
to provide a comprehensive overview of their advances,
applications, and implications for sustainable farming.
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
3
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
2.1 Literature Search Strategy
The literature search was conducted across major
scientific databases to ensure broad coverage of relevant
peer-reviewed publications. The primary databases
utilized included:
•
PubMed: For biological and health-related aspects,
including plant physiology and toxicology.
•
Scopus: Comprehensive database covering various
scientific disciplines, including environmental
science, materials science, and agriculture.
•
Web of Science: For interdisciplinary research and
citation analysis.
•
Google Scholar: For broader coverage, including
conference proceedings and preprints, and to
identify highly cited foundational works.
•
The search queries were constructed using a
combination of keywords to capture the breadth of
research on CuO NPs in agriculture:
•
"copper
oxide
nanoparticles"
OR
"CuO
nanoparticles"
•
"agro-nanotechnology"
OR
"nanotechnology
agriculture" OR "sustainable agriculture"
•
"nano-fertilizer" OR "nanofertilizer" OR "plant
growth" OR "nutrient uptake"
•
"nano-pesticide" OR "nanopesticide" OR "fungicide"
OR "plant pathogen" OR "pest management"
•
"green synthesis" OR "biosynthesis"
•
"environmental fate" OR "ecotoxicity" OR "soil
interaction" OR "aquatic environment"
Boolean operators (AND, OR) were used to combine
these keywords effectively. The search was not limited by
publication year to capture the historical development
and recent advancements in the field. Reference lists of
highly relevant review articles and primary research
papers were also manually screened for additional
pertinent publications (backward citation chaining).
2.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
•
Studies focusing on the synthesis, characterization,
and application of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO
NPs) in agricultural contexts.
•
Research investigating the effects of CuO NPs on
plant growth, nutrient uptake, crop yield, and stress
tolerance.
•
Studies exploring the pesticidal, fungicidal, or
insecticidal properties of CuO NPs against plant
pathogens and pests.
•
Papers
discussing
the
environmental
fate,
transformation, mobility, and ecotoxicity of CuO
NPs in soil, water, and biological systems relevant to
agriculture.
•
Review articles synthesizing knowledge on
nanotechnology
in
agriculture
or
specific
nanomaterials.
•
Publications in English.
•
Exclusion Criteria:
•
Studies focusing on other metal oxide nanoparticles
(e.g., ZnO NPs, TiO2 NPs) unless they provided direct
comparative data with CuO NPs or discussed general
principles highly relevant to CuO NPs.
•
Research on bulk copper materials without specific
nanoparticle properties.
•
Studies primarily focused on industrial applications
of CuO NPs (e.g., catalysis, electronics) without
agricultural relevance.
•
Clinical or medical applications of CuO NPs not
directly related to plant or soil health.
•
Non-peer-reviewed articles, conference abstracts
without full papers, or informal publications, unless
they represented a seminal or unique contribution
not found elsewhere.
2.3 Data Extraction and Analysis
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
4
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
For each selected publication, the following information
was systematically extracted and meticulously analyzed:
•
Type of Study: (e.g., experimental, review,
modeling).
•
Synthesis Method of CuO NPs: (e.g., green synthesis,
chemical, physical).
•
Application Area: (e.g., nano-fertilizer, nano-
pesticide, seed priming).
•
Observed
Effects/Outcomes:
(e.g.,
increased
biomass, disease suppression, altered nutrient
uptake).
•
Mechanism of Action: (e.g., oxidative stress, nutrient
delivery, physical barrier).
•
Environmental Interactions: (e.g., aggregation,
dissolution, mobility in soil/water, impact on
microbes).
•
Benefits: Stated advantages for sustainable
agriculture.
•
Challenges/Limitations: Identified drawbacks, risks,
or knowledge gaps.
•
Cited References: For cross-referencing and ensuring
comprehensive coverage.
The extracted data were then synthesized and grouped
based on the categorization framework outlined in the
results section. A qualitative synthesis approach was
employed to identify recurring themes, emerging trends,
and areas of consensus or divergence within the
literature. Critical evaluation of methodologies and
findings was conducted to assess the robustness of the
evidence.
3. Results: Advances and Applications of Copper Oxide
Nanoparticles in Sustainable Farming
The review of current literature reveals significant
progress in the development and application of copper
oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) across various facets of
sustainable agriculture. These advances span from
innovative synthesis methods to diverse applications in
crop nutrition, protection, and soil management.
3.1 Synthesis of CuO Nanoparticles for Agricultural
Applications
The method of nanoparticle synthesis significantly
influences their physicochemical properties (size, shape,
surface area, stability), which in turn dictate their
biological activity and environmental fate. Recent trends
emphasize "green synthesis" due to its environmental
friendliness, cost-effectiveness, and reduced toxicity
compared to traditional chemical methods.
3.1.1 Green Synthesis Approaches
Green synthesis utilizes biological entities such as plant
extracts, fungi, bacteria, or algae as reducing and capping
agents, eliminating the need for hazardous chemicals
and high energy inputs [Ogwuegbu et al. 2024; Shah et
al. 2022; Sedefoglu et al. 2023; Labanni et al. 2023;
Bhuvaneshwari et al. 2018; Lakshimi et al. 2015].
•
Plant Extracts: Various plant extracts (e.g.,
Ligustrum
lucidum
,
Calotropis procera
,
Ocimum americanum
,
macrofungi) have been successfully employed to
synthesize CuO NPs [Ogwuegbu et al. 2024; Shah et
al. 2022; Sedefoglu et al. 2023; Manikandan et al.
2023]. These methods are often simple, scalable, and
produce NPs with good stability and controlled
morphology.
•
Advantages: Green synthesis offers several benefits,
including reduced environmental impact, lower
production costs, and the potential for enhanced
biocompatibility and reduced toxicity of the resulting
nanoparticles. The bioactive compounds from the
plant extracts can sometimes impart additional
beneficial properties to the NPs.
3.1.2 Other Synthesis Methods
While green synthesis is gaining prominence, other
methods are also used:
•
Sol-gel Synthesis: This method allows for the
production of porous CuO nanoparticle aggregates
with tunable specific surface areas, which can be
advantageous for controlled release applications
[Dörner et al. 2019].
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
5
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
•
Chemical and Physical Methods: Traditional chemical
precipitation,
hydrothermal,
and
thermal
decomposition methods are still employed to
produce CuO NPs with specific characteristics,
though they may involve harsher chemicals or higher
energy consumption.
3.2 CuO Nanoparticles as Nano-fertilizers
Copper is an essential micronutrient for plants, crucial for
processes like photosynthesis, respiration, and lignin
synthesis. CuO NPs, due to their nanoscale properties,
offer enhanced nutrient delivery and utilization.
3.2.1 Enhanced Nutrient Uptake and Plant Growth
Numerous studies have demonstrated the positive
effects of CuO NPs on various crops:
•
Growth Promotion: Foliar application or soil
amendment with CuO NPs has been shown to
promote
biomass
accumulation,
increase
photosynthetic pigments (e.g., chlorophyll), and
enhance overall plant growth in crops like lettuce
(
Lactuca sativa
), cowpea (
Vigna unguiculata
),
dragonhead (
Dracocephalum moldavica
), and wheat
(
Triticum aestivum
) [Kohatsu et al. 2021; Mustafa et
al. 2024; Nekoukhou et al. 2023; Alhaithloul et al.
2023; Ibrahim et al. 2022].
•
Nutrient Absorption: CuO NPs can improve the
absorption of not only copper but also other
essential nutrients, leading to better plant nutrition
[Francis et al. 2022; Singh et al. 2019; Alhaithloul et
al. 2023]. This is attributed to their small size, which
facilitates uptake through root pores or stomata, and
their high reactivity, which can mobilize nutrients in
the soil.
•
Yield Enhancement: Studies on cowpea and wheat
have reported enhanced crop yield attributes
following CuO NP application [Mustafa et al. 2024;
Alhaithloul et al. 2023].
•
Stress Tolerance: CuO NPs have also shown potential
in mitigating stress, for example, reducing the toxic
effects of nanoparticles themselves when surface-
doped with substances like Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)
[Hanif et al. 2023].
3.2.2 Nano-priming for Seed Germination and Seedling
Growth
Nano-priming, the pre-treatment of seeds with
nanoparticles, is an innovative technique to enhance
germination,
seedling
vigor,
and
early
plant
development.
•
Improved Germination: CuO NPs have been
effectively used in nano-priming to improve
germination rates and uniformity in various seeds,
including
Vigna
radiata [Sarkar et al. 2021; Rohilla et
al. 2020] and wheat [Rai-Kalal and Jajoo 2021].
•
Enhanced Seedling Growth: This technique
promotes robust seedling growth by stimulating
metabolic and antioxidant activities [Singh et al.
2017; Imtiaz et al. 2023; Faraz et al. 2023].
•
Mechanism: Nano-priming likely works by facilitating
water uptake, improving enzyme activity, and
enhancing nutrient availability to the germinating
embryo, leading to stronger and healthier seedlings
that are more resilient to environmental stresses
[Singh et al. 2016; Pereira et al. 2021; Pandey et al.
2024; Shelar et al. 2021; Khalaki et al. 2021].
3.2.3 Mechanisms of Action as Nano-fertilizers
The efficacy of CuO NPs as nano-fertilizers stems from
several key mechanisms:
•
Increased Surface Area: The high surface-to-volume
ratio of NPs allows for greater interaction with plant
roots and leaf surfaces, facilitating more efficient
nutrient absorption [Jakhar et al. 2022].
•
Controlled Release: NPs can be engineered to
release nutrients slowly over time, providing a
sustained supply to plants and reducing nutrient
leaching, thereby improving fertilizer use efficiency
[Elsabagh et al. 2024; Martins et al. 2024].
•
Enhanced Bioavailability: The nanoscale size can
increase the solubility and mobility of copper in soil,
making it more available for plant uptake compared
to bulk copper [Gupta et al. 2023; Saurabh et al.
2024].
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
6
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
•
Stimulation of Plant Metabolism: CuO NPs can
influence various physiological and biochemical
pathways in plants, including photosynthetic activity,
antioxidant defense systems, and enzyme activities,
leading to improved growth and stress tolerance
[Singh et al. 2017; Kohatsu et al. 2021].
3.3 CuO Nanoparticles as Nano-pesticides and
Fungicides
Plant diseases and insect pests pose significant threats to
global food security, causing substantial crop losses
annually [Savary et al. 2019; Figueroa et al. 2018].
Traditional pesticides often have negative environmental
impacts and lead to resistance development. CuO NPs
offer a promising alternative due to their broad-
spectrum antimicrobial and insecticidal properties.
3.3.1 Disease Suppression and Pathogen Management
CuO NPs exhibit potent activity against various plant
pathogenic fungi and bacteria:
•
Fungicidal Activity: They have been shown to
suppress fungal diseases like Fusarium wilt in
chrysanthemum and
Alternaria alternata
[Elmer et
al. 2021; Balu et al. 2023; Zhu et al. 2022]. They can
inhibit fungal growth, spore germination, and
mycelial development [Zabrieski et al. 2015].
•
Bactericidal Activity: CuO NPs also demonstrate
antibacterial properties against plant pathogenic
bacteria [Ali et al. 2021].
•
Mechanism: The antimicrobial action of CuO NPs is
primarily attributed to the generation of reactive oxygen
species (ROS), which cause oxidative stress, leading to
cell membrane damage, DNA damage, and protein
denaturation in pathogens [Muhammad et al. 2022; Liu
et al. 2023; Manzoor et al. 2023]. The release of copper
ions from the NPs also contributes to their toxicity.
Additionally, CuO NPs can trigger plant defense
mechanisms, enhancing the plant's natural resistance to
pathogens [Chen et al. 2022; Karmous et al. 2023].
3.3.2 Insect Pest Management
Beyond pathogens, CuO NPs show potential in managing
insect pests:
•
Larvicidal and Antifeedant Effects: Studies have
reported larvicidal and antifeedant effects of copper
nano-pesticides against agricultural pests like
Spodoptera frugiperda
[Rahman et al. 2022].
•
Mechanism: The insecticidal action can involve direct
toxicity through ingestion or contact, disruption of
digestive enzymes, or interference with insect
physiology [Muhammad et al. 2022]. Nano-
pesticides can offer targeted delivery and controlled
release, reducing the overall amount of active
ingredient needed [Hou et al. 2024; Dangi et al.
2021].
3.3.3 Advantages over Conventional Pesticides
•
Reduced Dosage: Nanoparticles often achieve
efficacy at lower concentrations compared to
conventional bulk pesticides, potentially reducing
chemical load in the environment [Liu et al. 2023].
•
Targeted Delivery: Nano-formulations can be
designed for targeted delivery to specific plant parts
or pests, minimizing off-target effects.
•
Reduced Resistance Development: The multi-modal
action (e.g., oxidative stress, ion release) of metal
oxide NPs may make it harder for pathogens and
pests to develop resistance compared to single-
target conventional pesticides.
3.4 Environmental Interactions and Fate of CuO
Nanoparticles
Understanding the environmental behavior of CuO NPs
is crucial for their safe and sustainable application in
agriculture. Their fate and transport in soil and aquatic
environments are influenced by various physicochemical
parameters.
3.4.1 Influence of Environmental Parameters
•
pH: Soil and water pH significantly affect the
dissolution, aggregation, and surface charge of CuO
NPs [Tiwari et al. 2022; Qiu et al. 2020; Peng et al.
2017; Khan et al. 2019; Siddiqui et al. 2017]. Lower
pH (acidic conditions) generally increases dissolution
and copper ion release, potentially enhancing
bioavailability but also increasing toxicity. Higher pH
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
7
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
(alkaline conditions) can promote aggregation and
reduce dissolution.
•
Ionic Strength and Electrolytes: The concentration of
ions in soil solution or water influences NP
aggregation. High ionic strength tends to reduce
electrostatic repulsion between NPs, leading to
aggregation and sedimentation [Chao et al. 2021; Wu
et al. 2020].
•
Natural Organic Matter (NOM): NOM (e.g., humic
acids, fulvic acids) plays a dual role. It can stabilize
NPs by coating their surfaces, preventing aggregation
and enhancing mobility [Liu et al. 2020; Khort et al.
2022; Yu et al. 2022]. However, NOM can also
facilitate the dissolution of CuO NPs by complexing
with released copper ions, thereby increasing copper
bioavailability [Liu et al. 2020].
•
Clay Fraction and Soil Type: The composition of the
soil, particularly its clay content, affects the retention
and mobility of NPs. Clay minerals can adsorb NPs,
reducing their transport [Tiwari et al. 2022].
•
Nanoplastics: Emerging research suggests that
nanoplastic debris can interact with metal oxide
nanoparticles, influencing their stability and
transport in soil solutions [Tiwari et al. 2022].
3.4.2 Ecotoxicity and Bioaccumulation
While beneficial for target organisms, the potential
ecotoxicity of CuO NPs to non-target organisms and their
bioaccumulation in the food chain are critical concerns.
•
Soil Microbiome: CuO NPs can impact the diversity
and activity of beneficial soil microorganisms, which
are essential for nutrient cycling and soil health
[Peixoto et al. 2024]. The extent of this impact
depends on NP concentration, size, and surface
properties.
•
Non-target Organisms: Studies have shown cytotoxic
and genotoxic effects of CuO NPs on various
organisms in vitro [Bucchianico et al. 2013]. Their
impact on aquatic organisms like
Daphnia magna
has
also been investigated [Yu et al. 2022].
•
Bioaccumulation: There are concerns about the
uptake and accumulation of copper from CuO NPs in
edible plant parts, potentially posing health risks to
consumers [Ji et al. 2022; Alhaithloul et al. 2023].
While some studies show minimal accumulation,
long-term effects need thorough investigation.
The environmental fate and potential ecotoxicity of CuO
NPs necessitate careful consideration in their design and
application to ensure that the benefits for agriculture
outweigh any potential risks.
4. Discussion
The preceding sections have meticulously detailed the
burgeoning role of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs)
in agro-nanotechnology, highlighting their innovative
applications as nano-fertilizers and nano-pesticides, and
exploring their complex environmental interactions. This
discussion synthesizes these findings, evaluates their
contribution to sustainable farming, addresses the
inherent challenges, and proposes critical future
directions for research and responsible deployment.
4.1 Contribution to Sustainable Farming
The integration of CuO NPs into agricultural practices
offers a compelling pathway towards more sustainable
farming systems, primarily by enhancing efficiency and
reducing
reliance
on
conventional,
often
environmentally detrimental, chemical inputs.
•
Enhanced Resource Use Efficiency: As nano-
fertilizers, CuO NPs can significantly improve
nutrient uptake and utilization by plants [Francis et
al. 2022; Mustafa et al. 2024]. This enhanced
efficiency means that less fertilizer is needed to
achieve the same or even better yields, thereby
reducing the leaching of excess nutrients into water
bodies and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions
associated with fertilizer production and application
[Jakhar et al. 2022; Saurabh et al. 2024]. The
controlled release properties of some nano-
formulations further contribute to this efficiency
[Elsabagh et al. 2024].
•
Reduced Chemical Pesticide Dependency: The
potent antimicrobial and insecticidal properties of
CuO NPs provide an effective alternative to
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
8
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
conventional pesticides [Servin et al. 2015; Manzoor
et al. 2023]. By offering targeted action and requiring
lower dosages, nano-pesticides can minimize off-
target effects on beneficial organisms, reduce
pesticide residues in food and the environment, and
potentially slow down the development of pest
resistance [Liu et al. 2023; Dangi et al. 2021]. This
directly supports the global push for more
environmentally benign pest management strategies
[Nehra et al. 2021; Ceresini et al. 2024].
•
Improved Crop Resilience and Yield: Beyond direct
nutrient and pest management, CuO NPs can
enhance plant physiological processes, boost
antioxidant defense systems, and improve overall
plant vigor [Kohatsu et al. 2021; Nekoukhou et al.
2023]. This increased resilience can lead to more
stable and higher crop yields, contributing directly to
food security amidst growing population demands
[United Nations 2015; Muradi and Boz 2018]. Nano-
priming with CuO NPs specifically contributes to
stronger seedlings, laying a robust foundation for
crop development [Pandey et al. 2024; Imtiaz et al.
2023].
•
Eco-friendly Synthesis: The increasing focus on green
synthesis methods for CuO NPs aligns perfectly with
the principles of sustainable chemistry [Labanni et al.
2023; Ogwuegbu et al. 2024]. By utilizing biological
resources and avoiding harsh chemicals, these
methods reduce the environmental footprint of
nanoparticle production itself, making the entire life
cycle of agro-nanomaterials more sustainable
[Chahar and Mukherji 2022].
4.2 Challenges and Risks for Responsible Adoption
Despite the compelling benefits, the widespread and
responsible adoption of CuO NPs in agriculture faces
significant
challenges
and
necessitates
careful
consideration of potential risks.
•
Environmental Fate and Ecotoxicity: This is perhaps
the most critical concern. Once applied to
agricultural fields, CuO NPs can undergo various
transformations (dissolution, aggregation, surface
coating) influenced by soil pH, organic matter
content, and ionic strength [Tiwari et al. 2022; Qiu et
al. 2020; Liu et al. 2020; Peng et al. 2017]. Their
mobility in soil and potential leaching into
groundwater or runoff into surface waters are not
yet fully understood, posing risks to aquatic
ecosystems [Chao et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2020]. More
importantly, their impact on non-target organisms,
particularly beneficial soil microorganisms (e.g.,
nitrogen-fixing bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi), is a
major area of concern [Peixoto et al. 2024].
Disrupting the delicate balance of the soil
microbiome could have long-term negative
consequences for soil health and fertility. Cytotoxic
and genotoxic effects on other organisms have also
been reported [Bucchianico et al. 2013; Muhammad
et al. 2022].
•
Bioaccumulation and Food Safety: The potential for
CuO NPs, or the copper ions released from them, to
be taken up by plants and accumulate in edible
tissues raises significant food safety concerns [Ji et
al. 2022; Alhaithloul et al. 2023]. While copper is an
essential nutrient, excessive accumulation can be
toxic to humans and animals. Robust studies on the
long-term
bioaccumulation
potential
across
different crop types and the subsequent trophic
transfer in the food chain are urgently needed.
•
Standardization and Quality Control: The synthesis
methods for CuO NPs can yield materials with
varying sizes, shapes, surface chemistries, and
crystalline structures [Dörner et al. 2019; Labanni et
al. 2023]. These variations can profoundly affect
their efficacy, stability, and toxicity. A lack of
standardized production protocols and quality
control measures makes it difficult to ensure
consistent product performance and safety.
•
Regulatory Frameworks: The rapid pace of nano-
innovation has outstripped the development of
comprehensive regulatory frameworks [Chatterjee
2008; Kah and Kookana 2017]. Clear guidelines for
the testing, labeling, application, and disposal of
agro-nanomaterials are essential to ensure their safe
use and public acceptance.
•
Economic Viability and Farmer Adoption: While
promising, the current production costs of some CuO
NP formulations might be higher than conventional
agrochemicals, posing a barrier to widespread
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
9
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
adoption, especially for smallholder farmers. The
economic benefits need to be clearly demonstrated
and accessible financing mechanisms established.
•
Knowledge Gaps: Despite significant research,
fundamental knowledge gaps remain regarding the
long-term interactions of CuO NPs with complex soil
ecosystems, their precise uptake and translocation
mechanisms in diverse plant species, and their
ultimate fate in the environment.
4.3 Comparison with Conventional Methods and Other
Nanomaterials
CuO NPs offer distinct advantages over bulk copper
materials due to their enhanced reactivity, increased
surface area, and potential for controlled release. This
often translates to lower required dosages, reducing
overall copper input into the environment while
maintaining or improving efficacy. Compared to
conventional synthetic pesticides, CuO NPs present a
more environmentally friendly alternative, potentially
mitigating issues like pesticide runoff and resistance
development.
When compared to other metal oxide nanoparticles (e.g.,
ZnO NPs, TiO2 NPs), CuO NPs have unique properties
related to copper's dual role as a nutrient and an
antimicrobial agent. While ZnO NPs also show promise as
nano-fertilizers and antimicrobials [Singh et al. 2019;
Karmous et al. 2023; Altabbaa et al. 2023], the specific
benefits and risks of CuO NPs are distinct and warrant
dedicated research. Hybrid nanocomposites, combining
CuO with other materials (e.g., silver, polymers), are also
being explored to create multifunctional materials with
enhanced properties [Manikandan et al. 2023; Zhu et al.
2022].
4.4 Future Directions
To fully realize the potential of CuO NPs for sustainable
agriculture while minimizing risks, several key areas
require concerted future research and development:
•
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Risk Assessment:
Comprehensive LCAs are needed to evaluate the
environmental footprint of CuO NPs from synthesis
to application and disposal, comparing them
rigorously with conventional alternatives. Robust,
long-term risk assessments, considering various
environmental compartments and trophic levels, are
essential to inform regulatory decisions.
•
Mechanism-Oriented Design: Future research should
focus on designing CuO NPs with tailored properties
(size, shape, surface coating, doping) that optimize
their beneficial effects (e.g., nutrient delivery,
antimicrobial action) while minimizing unintended
environmental impacts. This includes developing
smart nano-delivery systems that respond to specific
environmental cues (e.g., pH, enzyme activity) for
precise and controlled release [Hou et al. 2024;
Martins et al. 2024].
•
Advanced Green Synthesis: Further innovation in
green synthesis methods is crucial to develop highly
scalable, cost-effective, and truly sustainable
production routes for CuO NPs, potentially utilizing
agricultural waste products as feedstocks.
•
Long-term Field Studies: Most studies are laboratory
or greenhouse-based. Long-term field trials under
diverse agro-climatic conditions are critically needed
to validate efficacy, assess real-world environmental
fate, and monitor potential bioaccumulation in the
food chain.
•
Interactions with Soil Biota: Deeper understanding of
the complex interactions between CuO NPs and the
diverse soil microbiome is paramount. Research
should focus on identifying thresholds for adverse
effects on beneficial microorganisms and developing
strategies to mitigate such impacts.
•
Regulatory Science and Policy: Collaborative efforts
between scientists, policymakers, and industry are
needed to develop science-based regulatory
frameworks that facilitate responsible innovation
while ensuring environmental and human safety
[Chatterjee 2008]. This includes developing
standardized testing protocols and guidelines for
safe handling and disposal.
•
Public Perception and Acceptance: Engaging with
farmers and the public to address concerns, build
trust, and ensure transparency regarding the
benefits and risks of agro-nanotechnology is
essential for successful adoption.
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
10
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
5. Conclusion
Copper oxide nanoparticles represent a frontier in agro-
nanotechnology, offering transformative potential for
enhancing agricultural sustainability and addressing
critical
challenges
in
food
production.
Their
demonstrated efficacy as nano-fertilizers, promoting
plant growth and nutrient uptake, and as nano-
pesticides,
providing
robust
protection
against
pathogens and pests, positions them as valuable tools in
the pursuit of more efficient and environmentally
friendly farming systems. The increasing adoption of
green synthesis methods further strengthens their
appeal by aligning production with sustainable principles.
However, the journey towards widespread and
responsible deployment of CuO NPs in agriculture is still
in its early stages. Critical challenges related to their
environmental fate, potential ecotoxicity to non-target
organisms, and concerns regarding bioaccumulation in
the food chain necessitate rigorous and long-term
scientific investigation. The development of robust
regulatory frameworks, coupled with a deeper
understanding of their complex interactions within
diverse agro-ecosystems, is paramount to ensuring their
safe and sustainable integration.
Ultimately, CuO NPs hold immense promise to contribute
to a future where agriculture is not only highly productive
but also environmentally benign and resilient. Realizing
this potential hinges on continued interdisciplinary
research, fostering innovation in their design and
application, and establishing clear, science-based
guidelines for their responsible use. By embracing a
cautious
yet
progressive
approach,
agro-
nanotechnology, spearheaded by materials like copper
oxide nanoparticles, can play a pivotal role in securing
global food supplies while safeguarding our planet for
future generations.
References
1.
Adhikari, T., Kundu, S., Biswas, AK., Tarafdar, JC., Rao,
AS. (2012). Effect of copper oxide nano particle on
seed germination of selected crops. J Agric Sci
Technol, 2(6A), 815.
2.
Adhikari, T., Sarkar, D., Mashayekhi, H., Xing, B.
(2016). Growth and enzymatic activity of maize (Zea
mays L.) plant: solution culture test for copper
dioxide nano particles. J Plant Nutr, 39(1), 99
–
115.
3.
Ali, M., Ijaz, M., Ikram, M., Ul-Hamid, A., Avais, M.,
Anjum,
AA.
(2021).
Biogenic
synthesis,
characterization
and
antibacterial
potential
evaluation of copper oxide nanoparticles against
Escherichia coli. Nanoscale Res Lett, 16(1), 148.
4.
Alhaithloul, HAS., Ali, B., Alghanem, SMS., Zulfiqar,
F., Al-Robai, SA., Ercisli, S., Yong, JW., Moosa, A.,
Irfan, E., Ali, Q., Irshad, MA. (2023). Effect of green-
synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles on growth,
physiology,
nutrient
uptake,
and
cadmium
accumulation in Triticum aestivum (L.). Ecotoxicol
Environ Safety, 268, 115701.
5.
Altabbaa, S., Kumari, A., Sharma, R., Parashar, A.,
Thakur, N. (2023). South African journal of botany
Chitosan-coated ZnO nanocomposites of Lantana
camara and Rhamnus triquetra for effective
antimicrobial activity. S Afr J Bot, 161, 126
–
39.
6.
Arunkumar, B., Jeyakumar, SJ., Jothibas, M. (2023).
Study on the efficiency of biomedical and
degradation of dye through CuO nanoparticles
synthesized at various molar concentrations. In:
Arunkumar B, editor. Progress in chemical science
research. Amsterdam: Elseiver, 144
–
63.
7.
Ayoub, HA., Khairy, M., Elsaid, S., Rashwan, FA.,
Abdel-Hafez, HF. (2018). Pesticidal activity of
nanostructured metal oxides for generation of
alternative pesticide formulations. J Agric Food
Chem, 66(22), 5491
–
8.
8.
Balu, SK., Andra, S., Jeevanandam, J., Kulabhusan,
PK., Khamari, A., Vedarathinam, V., Hamimed, S., San
Chan, Y., Danquah, MK. (2023). Exploring the
potential of metal oxide nanoparticles as fungicides
and plant nutrient boosters. Crop Prot, 174, 106398.
9.
Banerjee, S., Islam, J., Mondal, S., Saha, A., Saha, B.,
Sen, A. (2023). Proactive attenuation of arsenic-
stress by nano-priming: Zinc oxide nanoparticles in
Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper trigger antioxidant defense
response
and
reduce
root-shoot
arsenic
translocation. J Hazard Mater, 446, 130735.
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
11
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
10.
Bhuvaneshwari, V., Vaidehi, D., Logpriya, S. (2018).
Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles for
biological applications. Microbiol Curr Res, 2(1), 10.
11.
Botsa, SM., Ramadevi, D., Basavaiah, K. (2018). A
facile synthesis of copper oxide nanorods for
photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant and
inactivation of pathogens. J Nanosci Technol, 4(5),
467
–
70.
12.
Broberg, MC., Uddling, J., Mills, G., Pleijel, H. (2017).
Fertilizer efficiency in wheat is reduced by ozone
pollution. Sci Total Environ, 607
–
608, 876
–
80.
13.
Bucchianico, SD., Fabbrizi, MR., Misra, SK., Valsami-
Jones, E., Berhanu, D., Reip, P., Bergamaschi, E.,
Migliore, L. (2013). Multiple cytotoxic and genotoxic
effects induced in vitro by differently shaped copper
oxide nanomaterials. Mutagenesis, 28(3), 287
–
99.
14.
Ceresini, PC., Silva, TC., Vicentini, SNC., Júnior, RPL.,
Moreira, SI., Castro-Ríos, K., Garcés-Fiallos, FR., Krug,
LD., de Moura, SS., da Silva, AG., de Paiva Custódio,
AA. (2024). Strategies for managing fungicide
resistance in the Brazilian tropical agroecosystem:
safeguarding food safety, health, and the
environmental quality. Tropical Plant Pathol, 49(1),
36
–
70.
15.
Chahar, R., Mukherji, MD. (2022). Environmental
applications of phytonanotechnology: a promise to
sustainable future. In: Shah MP, Roy A, editors.
Phytonanotechnology. Singapore: Springer Nature
Singapore, 141
–
59.
16.
Chao, SJ., Huang, CP., Lam, CC., Hua, LC., Chang, SH.,
Huang, C. (2021). Transformation of copper oxide
nanoparticles as affected by ionic strength and its
effects on the toxicity and bioaccumulation of copper
in zebrafish embryo. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 225,
112759.
17.
Chatterjee, R. (2008). The challenge of regulating
nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol, 42(2), 339
–
43.
18.
Chen, JN., Wu, LT., Kun, SO., Zhu, YS., Wei, DI. (2022).
Nonphytotoxic copper oxide nanoparticles are
powerful “nanoweapons” that trigger resistance in
tobacco against the soil-borne fungal pathogen
Phytophthora nicotianae. J Integr Agric, 21(11),
3245
–
62.
19.
Dangi, K., Verma, AK. (2021). Efficient & eco-friendly
smart nano-pesticides: Emerging prospects for
agriculture. Mater Today Proc, 45, 3819
–
24.
20.
Dayarathne, MC., Mridha, AU., Wang, Y. (2020).
Diagnosis of fungal plant pathogens using
conventional and molecular approaches. Diagn Plant
Dis. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94980.
21.
Deng, C., Wang, Y., Cantu, JM., Valdes, C., Navarro,
G., Cota-Ruiz, K., Hernandez-Viezcas, JA., Li, C.,
Elmer, WH., Dimkpa, CO., White, JC. (2022). Soil and
foliar exposure of soybean (Glycine max) to Cu:
nanoparticle coating-dependent plant responses.
NanoImpact, 26, 100406.
22.
Dhas,
CR., Malar,
KCMG.,
Venkatesh,
R.,
Arivukarasan, D., Monica, SES., Keerthana, S. (2021).
Insights on photocatalytic dye inactivation and
antimicrobial activity of pH-dependent facile
synthesised copper oxide nanoparticles. Appl Phys A,
127(12), 891.
23.
Dörner, L., Cancellieri, C., Rheingans, B., Walter, M.,
Kägi, R., Schmutz, P., Kovalenko, MV., Jeurgens, LP.
(2019). Cost-effective sol-gel synthesis of porous
CuO nanoparticle aggregates with tunable specific
surface area. Sci Rep, 9(1), 11758.
24.
Dulta, K., Koşarsoy Ağçeli, G., Chauhan, P., Jasrotia,
R., Chauhan, PK., Ighalo, JO. (2022). Multifunctional
CuO nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic dye
degradation and antibacterial activity. Sustain
Environ Res, 32, 1
–
52.
25.
Elsabagh, SS., Elkhatib, EA., Rashad, M. (2024). Novel
nano-fertilizers derived from drinking water industry
waste for sustained release of macronutrients:
performance, kinetics and sorption mechanisms.
Scientific Repor, 14(1), 5691.
26.
Elmer, WH., Zuverza-Mena, N., Triplett, LR., Roberts,
EL., Silady, RA., White, JC. (2021). Foliar application
of copper oxide nanoparticles suppresses fusarium
wilt development on chrysanthemum. Environ Sci
Technol, 55(15), 10805
–
10.
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
12
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
27.
Fang, Y., Zhang, L., Jiao, Y., Liao, J., Luo, L., Ji, S., Li, J.,
Dai, K., Zhu, S., Yang, M. (2016). Tobacco rotated with
rapeseed for soil-borne phytophthora pathogen
biocontrol: mediated by rapeseed root exudates.
Front Microbiol, 7, 1
–
11.
28.
Faraz, A., Faizan, M., Rajput, DV., Minkina, T., Hayat,
S., Faisal, M., Alatar, AA., Abdel-Salam, EM. (2023).
CuO nanoparticle-mediated seed priming improves
physio-biochemical and enzymatic activities of
Brassica juncea. Plants, 12(4), 803.
29.
Farooq, A., Javad, S., Jabeen, K., Ali Shah, A., Ahmad,
A., Shah, AN., Alyemeni, MN., Mosa, WF., Abbas, A.
(2023). Effect of calcium oxide, zinc oxide
nanoparticles and their combined treatments on
growth and yield attributes of Solanum lycopersicum
L. J King Saud Univ Sci, 35(5), 102647.
30.
Figueroa, M., Hammond-Kosack, KE., Solomon, PS.
(2018). A review of wheat diseases
—
a field
perspective. Mol Plant Pathol, 19(6), 1523
–
36.
31.
Francis, DV., Abdalla, AK., Mahakham, W., Sarmah,
AK., Ahmed, ZFR. (2024). Interaction of plants and
metal nanoparticles: Exploring its molecular
mechanisms for sustainable agriculture and crop
improvement. Environ Int, 30, 108859.
32.
Francis, DV., Sood, N., Gokhale, T. (2022). Biogenic
CuO and ZnO nanoparticles as nanofertilizers for
sustainable growth of Amaranthus hybridus. Plants,
11(20), 2776.
33.
Gupta, A., Rayeen, F., Mishra, R., Tripathi, M., Pathak,
N.
(2023).
Nanotechnology
applications
in
sustainable agriculture: an emerging eco-friendly
approach. Plant Nano Biol, 4, 100033.
34.
Hanif, S., Bilal, M., Nasreen, S., Latif, M., Zia, M.
(2023). Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) doping on the
surface of CuO-NPs reduces the toxic effects of NPs
on Lactuca sativa. J Biotechnol, 367, 53
–
61.
35.
Hou, C., Wei, N., Liang, Q., Tan, Y., Li, X., Feng, J.
(2024). Nano-pesticide delivery system based on UiO
-66 with pH sensitivity for precise control of
Spodoptera frugiperda. Pest Manag Sci, 81(2), 798
–
808.
36.
Ibrahim, AS., Ali, GAM., Hassanein, A., Attia, AM.,
Marzouk, ER. (2022). Toxicity and uptake of CuO
nanoparticles:
Evaluation
of
an
emerging
nanofertilizer on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant.
Sustainability, 14(9), 4914.
37.
Imtiaz, H., Shiraz, M., Mir, AR., Siddiqui, H., Hayat, S.
(2023). Nano-priming techniques for plant physio-
biochemistry and stress tolerance. J Plant Growth
Regul, 42(11), 6870
–
90.
38.
Jakhar, AM., Aziz, I., Kaleri, AR., Hasnain, M., Haider,
G., Ma, J., Abideen, Z. (2022). Nano-fertilizers: A
sustainable technology for improving crop nutrition
and food security. NanoImpact, 27, 100411.
39.
Jassal, PS., Kaur, D., Prasad, R., Singh, J. (2022). Green
synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles:
development and applications. J Agric Food Res, 10,
100361.
40.
Ji, H., Guo, Z., Wang, G., Wang, X., Liu, H. (2022).
Effect of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles on the growth,
nutrient absorption, and potential health risk of the
seasonal vegetable Medicago polymorpha L. PeerJ,
10, e14038.
41.
Kah, M., Kookana, R. (2017). Emerging investigator
series:
nanotechnology
to
develop
novel
agrochemicals: critical issues to consider in the
global agricultural context. Environ Science: Nano,
4(9), 1784
–
97.
42.
Karmous, I., Vaidya, S., Dimkpa, C., Zuverza-Mena,
N., da Silva, W., Barroso, KA., Milagres, J., Bharadwaj,
A., Abdelraheem, W., White, JC., Elmer, WH. (2023).
Biologically synthesized zinc and copper oxide
nanoparticles using Cannabis sativa L. enhance
soybean (Glycine max) defense against fusarium
virguliforme. Pesticide Biochem Physiol, 194,
105486.
43.
Khan, R., Inam, MA., Park, DR., Khan, S., Akram, M.,
Yeom, IT. (2019). The removal of CuO nanoparticles
from water by conventional treatment C/F/S: The
effect of pH and natural organic matter. Molecules,
24(5), 914.
44.
Khalaki, MA., Moameri, M., Lajayer, BA., Astatkie, T.
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
13
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
(2021). Influence of nano-priming on seed
germination and plant growth of forage and
medicinal plants. Plant Growth Regul, 93(1), 13
–
28.
45.
Khort, A., Brookman-Amissah, M., Hedberg, J.,
Chang, T., Mei, N., Lundberg, A., Sturve, J., Blomberg,
E., Odnevall, I. (2022). Influence of natural organic
matter on the transformation of metal and metal
oxide nanoparticles and their ecotoxic potency in
vitro. NanoImpact, 25, 100386.
46.
Kohatsu, MY., Lange, CN., Pelegrino, MT., Pieretti,
JC., Tortella, G., Rubilar, O., Batista, BL., Seabra, AB.,
de Jesus, TA. (2021). Foliar spraying of biogenic CuO
nanoparticles protects the defence system and
photosynthetic pigments of lettuce (Lactuca sativa).
J Clean Prod, 324, 129264.
47.
Labanni, A., Nasir, M., Arief, S. (2023). Research
progress and prospect of copper oxide nanoparticles
with controllable nanostructure, morphology, and
function via green synthesis. Mater Today Sustain,
24, 100526.
48.
Lakshimi, K., Jayashree, M., Shakila, BK. (2015).
Green and chemically synthesized copper oxide
nanoparticles-A preliminary research towards its
toxic behaviour. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, 7(13), 156
–
60.
49.
Liu, P., Ren, Z., Ding, W., Kong, D., Hermanowicz, SW.,
Huang, Y. (2023). Comparative environmental impact
assessment of copper-based nanopesticides and
conventional pesticides. ACS Agric Sci Sci Technol,
3(7), 593
–
600.
50.
Liu, S., Liu, Y., Pan, B., He, Y., Li, B., Zhou, D., Xiao, Y.,
Qiu, H., Vijver, MG., Peijnenburg, WJ. (2020). The
promoted dissolution of copper oxide nanoparticles
by dissolved humic acid: copper complexation over
particle dispersion. Chemosphere, 245, 125612.
51.
Manikandan, DB., Arumugam, M., Sridhar, A.,
Perumalsamy, B., Ramasamy, T. (2023). Sustainable
fabrication of hybrid silver-copper nanocomposites
(Ag-CuO NCs) using Ocimum americanum L. as an
effective regime against antibacterial, anticancer,
photocatalytic dye degradation and microalgae
toxicity. Environ Res, 228, 115867.
52.
Manzoor, MA., Shah, IH., Ali Sabir, I., Ahmad, A.,
Albasher, G., Dar, AA., Altaf, MA., Shakoor, A. (2023).
Environmental sustainable: Biogenic copper oxide
nanoparticles as nano-pesticides for investigating
bioactivities against phytopathogens. Environ Res,
231, 115941.
53.
Martins, MAR., Kiirika, LM., Schaffer, N., Sajnóg, A.,
Coutinho, JAP., Franklin, G., Mondal, D. (2024).
Unveiling dissolution kinetics of CuO nanofertilizer
using bio-based ionic liquids envisaging controlled
use efficiency for sustainable agriculture. ACS
Sustain Res Manage, 1(6), 1291
–
301.
54.
Muhammad, A., He, J., Yu, T., Sun, C., Shi, D., Jiang,
Y., et al. (2022). Dietary exposure of copper and zinc
oxides nanoparticles affect the fitness, enzyme
activity, and microbial community of the model
insect, silkworm Bombyx mori. Sci Total Environ, 813,
152608.
55.
Muradi, AJ., Boz, I. (2018). The contribution of
agriculture sector in the economy of Afghanistan. Int
J Sci Res Manage, 6(10), 750
–
5.
56.
Mustafa, M., Azam, M., Nawaz Bhatti, H., Khan, A.,
Zafar, L., Rehan Abbasi, AM. (2024). Green
fabrication of copper nano-fertilizer for enhanced
crop yield in cowpea cultivar: a sustainable
approach. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol, 56, 102994.
57.
Nehra, M., Dilbaghi, N., Marrazza, G., Kaushik, A.,
Sonne, C., Kim, KH., Kumar, S. (2021). Emerging
nanobiotechnology
in
agriculture
for
the
management of pesticide residues. J Hazard Mater,
401, 123369.
58.
Nekoukhou, M., Fallah, S., Pokhrel, LR., Abbasi-Surki,
A., Rostamnejadi, A. (2023). Foliar enrichment of
copper oxide nanoparticles promotes biomass,
photosynthetic pigments, and commercially valuable
secondary metabolites and essential oils in
dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) under
semi-arid conditions. Sci Total Environ, 863, 160920.
59.
Ogwuegbu, MC., Ayangbenro, AS., Mthiyane, DM.,
Babalola, OO., Onwudiwe, DC. (2024). Green
synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using Ligustrum
lucidum extract, and the antioxidant and antifungal
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
14
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
evaluation. Mater Res Express, 11(5), 055010.
60.
Pandey,
D.,
Singh,
A.,
Darbinyan,
N.,
Chakhmakhchyan, AD., Parmar, SS., Ghazaryan, K.
(2024). Revolutionizing sustainable agriculture with
nano-priming technology: a leap towards resilient
and high-yield crops. In: Pandey D, editor.
Nanotechnology applications and innovations for
improved soil health. Amsterdam: Elseiver, 305
–
15.
61.
Peng, C., Shen, C., Zheng, S., Yang, W., Hu, H., Liu, J.,
Shi, J. (2017). Transformation of CuO nanoparticles in
the aquatic environment: influence of pH,
electrolytes
and
natural
organic
matter.
Nanomaterials, 7(10), 326.
62.
Pereira, DESA., Oliveira, CH., Fraceto, FL., Santaella,
C. (2021). Nanotechnology potential in seed priming
for sustainable agriculture. Nanomaterials, 11(2),
267.
63.
Peixoto, S., Morgado, RG., Prodana, M., Cardoso,
DN., Malheiro, C., Neves, J., Santos, C., Khodaparast,
Z., Pavlaki, MD., Rodrigues, S., Rodrigues, SM. (2024).
Responses of soil microbiome to copper-based
materials (nano and bulk) for agricultural
applications: an indoor-mesocosm experiment.
NanoImpact, 34, 100506.
64.
Qian, YA., Haipeng, LI., Zhang, Y., Yinghao, LI., Helian,
LI. (2024). Wheat morphological and biochemical
responses to copper oxide nanoparticle treatment in
two soils. Pedosphere, 34(4), 814
–
25.
65.
Rahman, A., Pittarate, S., Perumal, V., Rajula, J.,
Thungrabeab, M., Mekchay, S., et al. (2022).
Larvicidal and antifeedant effects of copper nano-
pesticides against Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith)
and its immunological response. Insects, 13(11),
1030.
66.
Rai-Kalal, P., Jajoo, A. (2021). Priming with zinc oxide
nanoparticles
improve
germination
and
photosynthetic performance in wheat. Plant Physiol
Biochem, 160, 341
–
51.
67.
Rohilla, D., Chaudhary, S., Singh, N., Batish, DR.,
Singh, HP. (2020). Agronomic providences of surface
functionalized CuO nanoparticles on Vigna radiata.
Environ Nanotechnol Monitor Manage, 14, 100338.
68.
Sarkar, N., Sharma, RS., Kaushik, M. (2021).
Innovative application of facile single pot green
synthesized CuO and CuO@APTES nanoparticles in
nanopriming of Vigna radiata seeds. Environ Sci
Pollut Res, 28(11), 13221
–
8.
69.
Saritha, GNG., Anju, T., Kumar, A. (2022).
Nanotechnology-big impact: how nanotechnology is
changing the future of agriculture? J Agric Food Res,
10, 100457.
70.
Sarathi, R., Sundar, SM., Jayamurugan, P.,
Ganganagunta, S., Sudhadevi, D., Ubaidullah, M.,
Pandit, B., Gupta, M., Sehgal, SS., Rao, NS. (2023).
Impacts of pH on photocatalytic efficiency, the
control of energy and morphological properties of
CuO nanoparticles for industrial wastewater
treatment applications. Mater Sci Eng, 298, 116856.
71.
Saurabh, K., Prakash, V., Dubey, AK., Ghosh, S.,
Kumari, A., Sundaram, PK., Jeet, P., Sarkar, B.,
Upadhyaya, A., Das, A., Kumar, S. (2024). Enhancing
sustainability in agriculture with nanofertilizers. Dis
Appl Sci, 6(11), 559.
72.
Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, SJ., Esker, P.,
McRoberts, N., Nelson, A. (2019). The global burden
of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat Ecol
Evolut, 3(3), 430
–
9.
73.
Sedefoglu, N., Er, S., Veryer, K., Zalaoglu, Y., Bozok, F.
(2023). Green synthesized CuO nanoparticles using
macrofungi extracts: characterization, nanofertilizer
and antibacterial effects. Mater Chem Phys, 309,
128393.
74.
Servin, A., Elmer, W., Mukherjee, A., Torre-Roche,
RDL., Hamdi, H., White, JC., Bindraban, P., Dimkpa, C.
(2015). A review of the use of engineered
nanomaterials to suppress plant disease and
enhance crop yield. J Nanopart Res, 17, 1
–
21.
75.
Shah, IH., Ashraf, M., Sabir, IA., Manzoor, MA., Malik,
MS., Gulzar, S., Ashraf, F., Iqbal, J., Niu, Q., Zhang, Y.
(2022). Green synthesis and characterization of
copper oxide nanoparticles using Calotropis procera
leaf extract and their different biological potentials.
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
15
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
J Mol Struct, 1259, 132696.
76.
Sharma, D., Afzal, S., Singh, NK. (2021). Nanopriming
with phytosynthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles for
promoting germination and starch metabolism in
rice seeds. J Biotechnol, 336, 64
–
75.
77.
Shelar, A., Singh, AV., Maharjan, RS., Laux, P., Luch,
A., Gemmati, D., Tisato, V., Singh, SP., Santilli, MF.,
Shelar, A., Chaskar, M. (2021). Sustainable
agriculture
through
multidisciplinary
seed
nanopriming: prospects of opportunities and
challenges. Cells, 10(9), 2428.
78.
Siddiqui, H., Qureshi, MS., Haque, FZ. (2017). pH-
dependent single-step rapid synthesis of CuO
nanoparticles and their optical behavior. Opt
Spectrosc, 123, 903
–
12.
79.
Singh, A., Sengar, RS., Sharma, R., Raj. (2021). Nano-
priming technology for sustainable agriculture.
Biogeosyst Tech, 8, 79
–
92.
80.
Singh, A., Singh, NB., Hussain, I., Singh, H. (2017).
Effect of biologically synthesized copper oxide
nanoparticles on metabolism and antioxidant activity
to the crop plants Solanum lycopersicum and
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis. J Biotechnol, 262, 11
–
27.
81.
Singh, J., Kumar, S., Alok, A., Upadhyay, SK., Rawat,
M., Tsang, DC., Bolan, N., Kim, KH. (2019). The
potential of green synthesized zinc oxide
nanoparticles as nutrient source for plant growth. J
Clean Prod, 214, 1061
–
70.
82.
Singh, K., Singh, G., Singh, J. (2023). Sustainable
synthesis of biogenic ZnO NPs for mitigation of
emerging pollutants and pathogens. Environ Res,
219, 114952.
83.
Sonawane, H., Arya, S., Math, S., Shelke, D. (2021).
Myco-synthesized silver and titanium oxide
nanoparticles as seed priming agents to promote
seed germination and seedling growth of Solanum
lycopersicum: a comparative study. Int Nano Lett,
11(4), 371
–
9.
84.
Tiwari, E., Khandelwal, N., Singh, N., Biswas, S.,
Darbha, GK. (2022). Effect of clay colloid
–
CuO
nanoparticles
interaction
on
retention
of
nanoparticles in different types of soils: role of clay
fraction and environmental parameters. Environ Res,
203, 111885.
85.
Tiwari, E., Singh, N., Khandelwal, N., Ganie, ZA.,
Choudhary, A., Monikh, FA., Darbha, GK. (2022).
Impact of nanoplastic debris on the stability and
transport of metal oxide nanoparticles: Role of
varying soil solution chemistry. Chemosphere, 308,
136091.
86.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social
Affairs, Population Division. (2015). Population 2030:
Demographic challenges and opportunities for
sustainable development planning. Report No.:
(ST/ESA/SER.A/389).
https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/populat
ion/publications/pdf/trends/Population2030.pdf
87.
Vlachý, J. (2017). The value of innovation in
nanotechnology. Eng Econ, 28(5), 535
–
41.
88.
Wang, Y., Lin, Y., Xu, Y., Yin, Y., Guo, H., Du, W.
(2019). Divergence in response of lettuce (var.
ramosa
Hort.)
to
copper
oxide
nanoparticles/microparticles
as
potential
agricultural fertilizer. Environ Pollut Bioavail, 31(1),
80
–
4.
89.
Wani, KA., Kothari, R. (2018). Agricultural
nanotechnology: applications and challenges. Ann
Plant Sci, 7(3), 2146.
90.
Woźniak
-Budych, MJ., Staszak, K., Staszak, M. (2023).
Copper
and
copper-based
nanoparticles
in
medicine
—
perspectives and challenges. Molecules,
28(18), 6687.
91.
Wu, H., Fang, H., Xu, C., Ye, J., Cai, Q., Shi, J. (2020).
Transport and retention of copper oxide
nanoparticles
under
unfavorable
deposition
conditions caused by repulsive van der Waals force
in saturated porous media. Environ Pollut, 256,
113400.
92.
Yu, Q., Mu, Z., Wang, N., Wang, X., Xu, M., Li, H.
(2020). The aggregation and sedimentation of two
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
16
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
different sized copper oxide nanoparticles in soil
solutions: dependence on pH and dissolved organic
matter. Sci Total Environ, 731, 139215.
93.
Yu, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, G., Peijnenburg, WJGM.,
Vijver, MG. (2022). Effects of natural organic matter
on the joint toxicity and accumulation of Cu
nanoparticles and ZnO nanoparticles in Daphnia
magna. Environ Pollut, 292, 118413.
94.
Zhu, X., Ma, X., Gao, C., Mu, Y., Pei, Y., Liu, C., Zou, A.,
Sun, X. (2022). Fabrication of CuO nanoparticles
composite ε
-polylysine-alginate nanogel for high-
efficiency management of Alternaria alternate. Int J
Biol Macromol, 223, 1208
–
22
.
