IN VITRO EVALUATION OF ENZYME SUPPLEMENTATION FOR PREDICTING IN VIVO RESPONSE OF POULTRY
Keywords:
Abstract
In vitro evaluation of enzyme supplementation is used to predict the in vivo response of poultry to enzymes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of in vitro techniques in predicting the in vivo response of poultry to enzyme supplementation. Different in vitro techniques such as pepsin, amylase, and protease assays were used to evaluate enzyme efficacy. The results obtained from in vitro techniques were compared with the in vivo response of poultry to the same enzyme supplementation. The study showed that in vitro techniques such as pepsin, amylase, and protease assays can be effectively used to predict the in vivo response of poultry to enzyme supplementation. The study recommends the use of in vitro techniques for predicting the in vivo response of poultry to enzyme supplementation.
Similar Articles
-
DEVELOPMENT OF MARKETABLE PROPERTIES OF PROCESSED LEMON
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering: No. 02 (2022) / Khudayorova Sokhiba Itolmasovna, -
TEST RESULTS INSECT OAKARI ZIDA KARATE KADAM 5% K.E. AGAINST APPLE MOTH ON THE APPLE TREE
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering: No. 05 (2022) / Rano Muminova, Oybek Usvaliev , -
Analysis Of Scientific Research On Reproduction Of Species Of Trichograms In Biolaboratory
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering: No. 08 (2020) / R.Jumaev, A.Rakhimova, -
Expansion Of Irrigation Networks Is A Priority For The Agricultural Sector (On The Example Of Fergana Region)
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering: No. 10 (2020) / Umidakhon Maripjanovna Akhmedova , -
The Process Of Drying Plums And Taking Precautions In Their Storage
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering: No. 10 (2020) / Jamilakhon Mukhammadovna Ermakova, -
New Classification Of Ontogenesis About
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering: No. 11 (2020) / Xoliqnazarov Begali Odinaevich, -
The History Of Construction Of Irrigation Facilities In The Ferghana Valley During The Second World War
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering: No. 12 (2020) / Kabuljan Makhamadjanovich Nasritdinov, -
Procedure For Drying Peaches And Storage Of Dried Product
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering: No. 05 (2021) / Jamilakhon Mukhammadovna Ermakova, Khasan Eshmamatovich Daminov, Gulyora Qobiljon Qizi Madumarova, -
FEATHERED GROWTH: OPTIMIZING QUAIL PERFORMANCE DURING THE STARTER-GROWER PHASE
-
The Effect Of The Trichoderma Fungus On The Fertility Of Plants
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering: No. 03 (2021) / Mamadiyev Khusanboy Ganijonovich,
References
Rajesh J, Utsav PT. Rapid Techniques for Feed Evaluation: Scope and Limitations, New Zealand Poultry Industry Conference. 2016; 13:84-102.
Kitessa S, Flinn PC, Irish GG. Comparison of Methods Used to Predict the In vivo Digestibility of Feeds in Ruminants, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research.1999; 50: 825-841.
Adeniji AA, Jimoh A. Effects of Replacing Maize with Enzyme-supplemented Bovine Rumen Content in the Diets of Pullet Chicks. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2007; 6 ; 814-817.
Jimoh A. Matrix Effects of Enzymes and Cocktails onIn VitroDigestibility of Rice Husk. 21st Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria, (Eds.) Ajayi FO, Akinola LAF, Agaviezor BO, George OS. Port Harcourt, Nigeria. 2016;1: 40-45.
Oyenuga VA, Nigeria Feed and Feedstuffs. Ibadan University Press 3rd Edition. 1968
Fasuyi AO, Olumuyiwa TA. Evaluating Nutritional Potential of Bio-fermented Rice Husk in Broilers Diets. American Journal of Food Technology.2013; 7:726-735.
Boisen S, Fernadez JA. Prediction of the Total Tract Digestibility of Energy in Feedstuffs and Pig Diets byIn vitroAnalyses. Animal Feed Science Technology.
AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Washington DC. 2005; 1:94-115.
VanSoest PJ. Development of a Comprehensive System of Feed Analysis and its Application to Forages. Journal of Animal Science, 1967; 26: 119-128.
Sibald IR. The True Metabolisable Energy Values of Several Feeding Stuffs Measured with Roosters, Laying Hens, Turkeys and Broiler Hens. Poultry Science. 1976; 55:1459¬1463.
Statistical Analysis System SAS. Statistical Analysis System SAS User’s Guide, Version 8, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA. 2002
Duncan DB. Multiple Range and Multiple F-tests, Biometrics. 1955; 11: 1-42.
Belewu MA. Biodegradation of Sorghum Stover by Fungi and the Feeding of Resulting Stovers to Rat. Proceedings of 3rd Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria, Ikeja Lagos. 1998; 17-19.
Warren BE, Farrell DJ. The Nutritive Value of Full-fat and Defatted Australian Rice Bran. I. Chemical Composition. Animal Feed Science Technology.1960; 27: 219-228.
Shqueir AA, Brown DL, Klasing KC. Canavanine Content and Toxicity of Sesbania Leaf Meal for Growing Chicks. Animal Feed Science Technology.1989; 25: 137-147.
Adeniji AA. Effects of Dietary Grit Inclusion on the Utilization of Rice Husk by Pullet Chicks, Tropical and Subtropical Agro-ecosystems.2010; (12): 175 –180.
Alabi OO, Atteh JO, Ogunniyi PT. Effect of Dietary Inclusion of Rice Husk Supplemented With Commercial Enzymes on Performance, Nutrient Retention and Gastro-Intestinal Tract Characteristics of Arbor Acres Broilers, American Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2014; 4:575-583.
Aderolu AZ, Iyayi EA, Abiodun AO. Changes in Nutritional Value of Rice Husk during Trichoderma virideDegradation, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2007; 13: 583-589.
Kies AK, Hemert Van KHF, Sauer WC. Effect of Phytase on Protein and Amino Acid Digestibility and Energy Utilization.World's Poultry Science Journal. 2001; 57: 109-126.
Cardot J, Beyssac E, Alric M.In vitro-In vivo Correlation; Importance of Dissolution in IVIVC, Dissolution Technologies. 2007; 14:15-19.
