15
Volume 04 Issue 03-2022
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
(ISSN
–
2689-1018)
VOLUME
04
I
SSUE
03
Pages:
15-19
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2020:
5.
34
)
(2021:
5.
554
)
(2022:
6.
291
)
OCLC
–
1121105746
METADATA
IF
–
7.125
Publisher:
The USA Journals
ABSTRACT
This standard provides a detailed description of the phytosanitary risk analysis process performed on the lawn to
determine if a pest may be a quarantine pest. The application of flour to risk assessment, as well as the harmonized
processes required to select a phytosanitary risk management option, are described.
KEYWORDS
FRT, Quarantine phytosanitary, harmful plants, potential economic.
Research Article
DESCRIPTION OF THE PHYTOSANITARY RISK ANALYSIS PROCESS
PERFORMED ON THE LAWN TO DETERMINE A PHYTOSANITARY
RISK MANAGEMENT
Submission Date:
February 20, 2022,
Accepted Date:
March 06, 2022,
Published Date:
March 16, 2022 |
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajabe/Volume04Issue03-02
Kamoladdin Khudarganov
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the Laboratory, Research Institute for Quarantine and Plant
Protection Agency for Quarantine and Plant Protection of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Nizom Azimov
Senior Researcher, Research Institute for Quarantine and Plant Protection Agency for Quarantine and
Plant Protection of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Jurabek Yakhyoev
Junior researcher, Research Institute for Quarantine and Plant Protection Agency for Quarantine and Plant
Protection of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Mashrabjon Shaymanov
PhD student, Research Institute for Quarantine and Plant Protection Agency for Quarantine and Plant
Protection of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theamericanjou
rnals.com/index.php/ta
jabe
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
16
Volume 04 Issue 03-2022
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
(ISSN
–
2689-1018)
VOLUME
04
I
SSUE
03
Pages:
15-19
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2020:
5.
34
)
(2021:
5.
554
)
(2022:
6.
291
)
OCLC
–
1121105746
METADATA
IF
–
7.125
Publisher:
The USA Journals
INTRODUCTION
The tasks of the FRT for the area under consideration
are to identify pests of quarantine importance and / or
their distribution routes and to assess the risks
associated with them, as well as to identify the
endangered area and, if necessary, to identify
phytosanitary risk management options. Quarantine
phytosanitary risk analysis (FRT) for pests is a three-
step process:
Step 1 (preparatory phase of the process) is to identify
the quarantine pest (s) and ways of its (s) distribution,
which should be considered in the phytosanitary risk
analysis for a particular region of the FRT.
Stage 2 (risk assessment) begins with the classification
of individual pests in order to establish their
satisfaction with the criteria of quarantine pests. Risk
assessment includes the assessment of the probability
of entry, acclimatization and spread of a pest, as well
as potential economic consequences (including
environmental consequences - S1).
Phase 3 (risk management assessment) consists of
identifying management options to reduce the risk
identified in Phase 2. These options are evaluated in
terms of their effectiveness, feasibility, and their
impact to select appropriateness.
Information requirements
. If it is established that the
organism in question has the potential to become a
quarantine pest, then it is necessary to continue the
FRT process. If the pest does not meet all the criteria
of the quarantine pest, then the FRT process can be
stopped in relation to this pest. In the absence of
sufficient information, this uncertainty should be
identified and the FRT process should be continued.
The introduction of a pest involves both its entry and
acclimatization.
Assessing
the
probability
of
introduction requires an analysis of each pathway
associated with the spread of the pest from its place of
origin to its acclimatization to the FRT region. In a FRT
initiated by a specific route of transmission (usually
with an imported commodity), the probability of each
pest entering is assessed for that route of
transmission. It is also necessary to study the
possibility of the entry of pests associated with other
routes of transmission.
As for the risk analysis initiated against a particular pest
that is not related to a particular brand or route of
transmission, then any route of transmission should be
considered.
17
Volume 04 Issue 03-2022
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
(ISSN
–
2689-1018)
VOLUME
04
I
SSUE
03
Pages:
15-19
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2020:
5.
34
)
(2021:
5.
554
)
(2022:
6.
291
)
OCLC
–
1121105746
METADATA
IF
–
7.125
Publisher:
The USA Journals
Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests
Special situation for harmful plants.
The probability of
the entry of pests depends on the routes of
transmission from the exporting country to the
destination, as well as the amount and frequency of
pests associated with it. The longer the route of
transmission, the higher the probability that the pest in
question will enter the FRT region.
Distribution routes registered in the document should
be taken into account in relation to the probability of
the pest in question entering new areas. Other
potential distribution routes that are not currently
available should also be evaluated. Data on the
detection of pests in cargoes may indicate their ability
to be associated with the ways in which they spread
and survive during transport or storage.
To assess the possibility of acclimatization of the pest,
it is necessary to collect reliable data on the biology of
the pest in question from the regions where it is
currently encountered. The situation in the FRT region
can then be compared with the situation in the regions
where the pest is currently present (taking into
account protected habitats such as greenhouses and
hothouses) and expert opinion can be used to assess
the possibility of acclimatization. It is also possible to
see a description of the cases involving the compared
pests. Factors to consider are:
The presence, quantity and distribution of hosts in
the FRT region under consideration;
Suitability of the environment in the FRT area
under consideration;
Flexibility
potential
of
the
pest
under
consideration;
Reproductive strategy of the pest under
consideration;
The method of survival of the pest;
Economic practices and control measures.
A pest with a high prevalence potential may also have
a high potential for acclimatization, while its successful
18
Volume 04 Issue 03-2022
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
(ISSN
–
2689-1018)
VOLUME
04
I
SSUE
03
Pages:
15-19
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2020:
5.
34
)
(2021:
5.
554
)
(2022:
6.
291
)
OCLC
–
1121105746
METADATA
IF
–
7.125
Publisher:
The USA Journals
localization and / or destruction may be more limited.
In order to assess the probability of the spread of a
pest in question, it is necessary to collect sufficiently
reliable biological data from its current distribution
area. The situation information in the FRT region under
consideration is then carefully compared with the
current prevalence zone situation of the pest and
expert opinion is used to assess the probability of
spread. The description of cases involving the pests
being compared can also be used effectively. Examples
of factors to consider are:
Suitability of the natural and / or controlled
environment for the natural spread of the pest
in question;
The presence of natural barriers;
Potential for relocation by goods or vehicles;
The expected use of the goods;
Potential carriers of the pest in question in the
FRT region;
Potential natural relatives of the pest in
question in the FRT region.
Probability information is used to assess how quickly
the potential economic significance of a pest will
manifest itself within the FRT region. If the pest in
question is able to enter and acclimatize to an area of
low potential economic importance and then spread
from there to an area of high potential economic
importance, then yes it is considered significant. In
addition, it can be very important in the phytosanitary
risk assessment phase when considering the possibility
of localizing or eradicating an introducible pest.
CONCLUSION CONCERNING THE ENDANGERED AREA
The requirements described at this stage indicate what
information should be collected about the pest in
question and its potential plant owner and offer a level
of economic analysis that can be performed using this
information to comprehensively assess the impact of
the pest in question (i.e. the probability of economic
consequences). Where possible, quantitative data
showing the material nature of the loss should be
obtained. Quality data can also be applied. Consulting
an economist can also be helpful.
In many cases, a detailed analysis of the estimated
economic damage is not considered necessary if there
is sufficient evidence that the introduction of the pest
has caused undesirable economic damage (including
environmental damage) and it is universally
acknowledged. In such cases, phytosanitary risk
assessment focuses primarily on the likelihood of
introduction and spread. However, if the level of
economic loss is in question or knowledge of the level
of economic loss is necessary to determine the severity
of risk management measures, or to eliminate the
introduction or assess the effectiveness of the fight, a
detailed consideration of economic factors is
necessary.
REFERENCES
1.
Васютин А.С., Каюмов М.К., Мальцев В.Ф.
Карантин растений. М. 2002. – С. 536.
2.
Murodov B.E., Yakhyoyev J.N. Quarantine
Pests Of Internal Quarantine Of The Republic
Of Uzbekistan // Education and science in
Russia and abroad. 2017 | Pages: 32-36.
3.
Murodov B.E., Sulaymonov O.A., Yakhyoyev
J.N. Harm of quarantine pests of the internal
quarantine of the republic of Uzbekistan //
Proceedings
of
2nd
International
Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on
Innovative Technology. Organized by Novateur
Publications, India. July 25th, – 2020. – P. 13-18.
4.
https://www.ippc.int/file_uploaded/127349004
6_ISPM_11_2010_E.pdf [на 01 июня 2011 года].
19
Volume 04 Issue 03-2022
The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering
(ISSN
–
2689-1018)
VOLUME
04
I
SSUE
03
Pages:
15-19
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2020:
5.
34
)
(2021:
5.
554
)
(2022:
6.
291
)
OCLC
–
1121105746
METADATA
IF
–
7.125
Publisher:
The USA Journals
5.
Муродов Б.Э., Сулаймонов О.А., Яхёев Ж.Н.
Калифорнийская щитовка на яблоне //
Образование и наука в России и за
зарубежом. – 2018. – № 12 (47). – С. 118-122.
6.
Murodov B.E., Ortikov U.D., Yakhyoyev J.N.
Bioecology
of
california
shield
(Quadraspidiotus
perniciosus
Comst)
in
Uzbekistan / Proceedings of International
Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on
Innovative Technology. Organized by Novateur
Publications, India. May 25th, – 2020. – P. 104-
107.
7.
Муродов Б.Э., Ортиков У.Д., Яхёев Ж.Н.
Биоэкология и развития калифорнийской
щитовки
(Quadraspidiotus
perniciosus
Comst.) в Узбекистане // Евразийский Союз
Ученых (ЕСУ). – 2020. – 5 (74). – С. 39-40.
8.
Машарипов У.А. Городской усач (Aеolesthes
sarta Solsky) – вредитель лесных насаждений
// Актуальные проблемы современной науки.
2020. 1 (110). – C. 108-110.
9.
https://gd.eppo.int/standards/PM5/
10.
https://gd.eppo.int/standards/PM3/
11.
https://gd.eppo.int/standards/PM11/
12.
https://www.ippc.int/ru/standards
