The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Information Systems: Opportunities and Challenges

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

151

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

TYPE

Original Research

PAGE NO.

151-176

DOI

10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue08-15

OPEN ACCESS

SUBMITED

31 July 2025

ACCEPTED

05 August 2025

PUBLISHED

18 August 2025

VOLUME

Vol.07 Issue 08 2025

CITATION

Yaseen Shareef Mohammed, Dhiraj Kumar Akula, Asif Syed, Gazi
Mohammad Moinul Haque, & Yeasin Arafat. (2025). The Impact of
Artificial Intelligence on Information Systems: Opportunities and
Challenges. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(8),
151

–

176. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue08-15

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.

The Impact of Artificial
Intelligence on
Information Systems:
Opportunities and
Challenges

Yaseen Shareef Mohammed

Master of Science Technology Management, Lindsey Wilson
University, 210 Lindsey Wilson St, Columbia, KY 42728 USA

Dhiraj Kumar Akula

Principal Data Architect, USA

Asif Syed

Master of Science Technology Management, Lindsey Wilson
University, 210 Lindsey Wilson St, Columbia, KY 42728 USA

Gazi Mohammad Moinul Haque

Department of Information Technology, Washington University of
Science and Technology (wust), Vienna, VA 22182

Yeasin Arafat

Department of Information Technology Service Administration and
Management, St. Francis College, 179 Livingston St, Brooklyn, NY
11201

Abstract:

The increased speed at which Artificial

Intelligence (AI) is integrated in Information Systems (IS)
is the paradigm shift in the way organizations operate,
manage their data and make decisions. In this paper, the
authors are going to address the multidimensional role
of AI in new IS, which is characterized by both the
opportunities to transform it and the urgency of
challenges related to this technology. That is why the
research is based on a data-driven approach, which is
cross-sectional since the current paper examines
empirical studies and real-life case examples and
provides statistical researches in high-impact journals
and technology reports around the world to study how
AI technologies: e.g., machine learning, natural language
processing, intelligent automation, and others redesign
IS architectures across industries. The study reveals a
huge improvement of operational efficiency, cost-

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

152

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

saving, accuracy of data processing and real-time
decision making. Nonetheless, it is also revealing the
challenges (such as; algorithmic biases, data governance
issues, ethical concerns, and cybersecurity risks). On the
thematic review of 25+ credible studies, it will be found
that whereas the AI-driven IS enhances scaling and
responsiveness, its adoption process is not always
smooth due to the lack of technical preparedness,
compliance with regulations, and skepticism towards
the use of AI in the decision-making process. This paper
is novel because of integrating the analysis of the
opportunities and the challenges, providing the
balanced picture with estimable figures. The results
indicate that there is strategic alignment that is required
between AI innovations with IS governance framework
to realize full potential of AI. Suggestions to design
ethical, resilient, as well as efficient AI-augmented IS
infrastructures

are

presented

to

businesses,

policymakers, and system designers. It can be argued
that the present paper would serve the community of
academia and the field of industry strategy by laying out
the step-by-step framework that involves the
sustainable and secure development of AI within
corporate IS ecosystems.

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems,

Digital

Transformation,

Business

Analytics,

Technological Integration

1.

Introduction

The reason is that in the era of the digital
transformation, the combination of Artificial Intelligence
(AI) systems and Information Systems (IS) has turned out
to be an extremely effective driver of change across
different industries. The possibility created with the AI
of radically transforming Information Systems formerly
providing the means of data storage, retrieval, as well as
performing usual management functions, is now being
put into effect due to the extended range of
functionality with which the AI is endowed. These
dynamics on integration of AI in IS are helping
organizations to generate predictive information,
automating of complex activities, greater precision in
decision making, and being able to constantly adapt to
dynamic environment. This transformation is not just an
add-on of technology, but rather a drastic change in the
way companies, governments, and institutions
understand and apply information in value creation.
With enterprises world over embracing data driven
business strategies, AI driven IS are not only critical in

operational

efficiency,

but

also

in

business

differentiation and business innovation. Nevertheless,
along with the potential of AI in the IS being huge, the
move is also filled with considerable obstacles to dealing
with ethics, data security, system complexity, and
adherence to regulations.

The idea of AI describes the process of replicating
human intelligence in a machine especially in a
computer system that is able to learn based on the
information presented and draw conclusions with less
human input. Conversely, Information Systems are
structured processes that receive, process, hold as well
as distribute information to assist functions of
management, operation as well as strategy inside an
institution. By integrating the concept of AI, IS systems
developed along those lines exploit the capabilities of
machine learning, deep learning, computer vision, and
natural language processing to develop adaptive and
autonomous systems that could process large volumes
of data on-demand. The systems have played a critical
role in facilitating more advanced capabilities including
predictive maintenance in the manufacture of goods,
detecting fraud in banking operations, intelligent supply
chain forecasting, and the personalization of a customer
experience in retailing. Companies using such systems
have reported great speed, accuracy, scalability, and
handling unstructured data, which is very difficult to
attain by using the traditional IS architecture.

Although such advantages apply, AI integration in IS is
not devoid of complications. The question regarding the
level of algorithmic bias is among the most critical issues
that have arisen as AI models, which have been trained
using biased or incomplete data, develop decisions that
turn out to be discriminatory and faulty. It is particularly
problematic in the context of, say, the healthcare,
financial industries, and criminal justice in which the AI-
based decision-making can be of great social
consequence to people. Furthermore, owing to the so-
called black box problem i.e., the inability to explain,
audit or understand AI decision-making processes,
stakeholders

face

severe

accountability

and

transparency problems with regards to the systems.
Moreover, IS using AI need extensive amounts of quality
data to be able to perform properly, posing problems of
data control, observing privacy standards, and computer
security. As laws like the General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR) and requirements by industry are
getting stricter, organizations have to strike the balance
between innovation and ethical responsibility and legal

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

153

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

compliance.

The next urgent issue is the technical and organizational
preparedness towards AI adoption. The implementation
of AI within existing IS usually requires the large-scale
reconstruction of infrastructure, the development of
cloud computing services, and highly skilled workers
with knowledge of both data science and systems
engineering. These requirements are a financial and
logistical restriction to many organizations, especially
small and medium enterprises. And, the cultural change
needed to adopt AI technologies may be intimidating as
well. Employees are generally resistant to automation
because they are concerned about job security, whereas
the decision makers are uncertain about the recovery of
investment and its long-term consequences. Accent is
also contributed by the fact that there are no standard
methods of integrating AI-IS that promote consistent
adoption methods, which are in turn hindered by
scalability and cross-functional application.

With these two dynamics occurring (meaningful
opportunities and essential moots), there is the urgency
of academic research on timely and methodic research
of the changing nature of the AI of IS. Although recent
research has mined the topic of AI on specific grounds
(e.g. enterprise resource planning or customer
relationship management), there are few general
researches that test the increased continuum of how AI
transforms IS as a whole. In addition, not much has been
done on overlapping studies of opportunities and
challenges especially concerning business and IT
alignment perspectives. The paper aims at addressing
this gap and bringing an integrated, data-driven deep
dive into the existing landscape. It examines the
changing IS architectures, identifies the benefits being
achieved and barriers to adoption being realized with
research findings based on peer reviewed academic
literature, industry surveys / reports and empirical
studies.

The objective of the study is mainly to critically examine
the implications of AI on Information Systems with the
dissection of the technological opportunities it opens as
well as the multidimensional problems that it poses. In
this research, the authors seek to introduce a subtle
insight into how the integration of AI can affect the work
of a system, business operations, governance systems,
and planning. An additional mission is to offer empirical
evidence on the way various industries are trying to
cope with this integration process basing on quantitative

data and real-life examples. The twofold emphasis
makes the study worthwhile in the sense that it serves
not only academics but also practitioners who may want
to read it in order to obtain practical tips in the use of AI.

The originality of the study is that it is holistic. As
opposed to looking at AI as a distinct technology or IS as
a closed system, the paper describes the relationship
with another based on synergy. It reemphasizes the
need to thoughtfully assess the effects of AI on IS, taking
into account situational context variables, including
industry maturity, organizational agility, and the
environment in terms of government regulations. In
addition, the method of organizing the paper with the
use of empirical data and basing the analysis on it helps
avoid hypothetical estimations, providing the evidence-
based conclusion. That way, it takes its part in
developing the academic literature on digital
transformation, technological innovation, and systems
strategy.

To conclude, the way of the development of AI as a
revolutionary agent of Information Systems requires a
close analysis of its opportunities and hazards. This
article is an answer to such a call because a wide-ranging
scholarly study of AI-integrated IS incorporation is
presented that is representative of the present
circumstances. It hopes to inform, influence, and assist
organizations, policy makers, and research scientists in
their search to make business-informed, ethical, and
strategic decisions when dealing with the intricacies of
integrating AI technologies in their information
architecture. This way, it strives to establish a basis upon
which constructive intelligent, secure and future-ready
IS ecosystems can be established to address the needs
of a more data-driven world.

2.

Literature Review

Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage in Information Systems
(IS)

has

become

one

of

the

most

powerful modifying factors in the way organizations
operate, make decisions, and manage data. Brynjolfsson
and McAfee¹ state that the capability of AI to handle
large volumes of unstructured data in real-time is a
paradigm shift in what was previously considered to
be IS, enabling predictive analytics and fully automated
decision-making at unprecedented levels. Such a view is
substantiated by the study of Davenport², which shows
that

IS

with

machine-learning-enhancements

achieve 30-50 percent greater efficiency in handling
information

compared

to

traditional

systems,

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

154

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

especially in data-heavy industries such as healthcare
and finance. The business-value proposition of AI-
driven IS has been scientifically tested in numerous
industries, with improvements in operational efficiency

(up

to

20-30

percent) reported among

early

technological adopters (the McKinsey Global Institute
study³).

Figure 01: Thematic Mapping of AI Impact Across Information Systems

Figure Description:

This mind map visualizes the

multidimensional impact of AI on Information Systems
by clustering real-world applications such as fraud
detection, predictive analytics, diagnostic accuracy, and

ethical concerns, supporting the Literature Review’s

exploration of both opportunities and challenges.

Certain applications reveal this powerful impact: Lee et

al.⁴ observed

40% reductions in downtimes in industrial

equipment with AI-powered predictive maintenance

systems,

and

Deloitte⁵

found 35

percent improvement in the accuracy of fraud detection
with significant

reductions in

false

positives. In

healthcare,

Esteva et al.⁶

demonstrated dermatologist-

level accuracy when

classifying

skin

cancer using convolutional

neural

networks.

These advancements are enabled by AI's unique ability
to process high-velocity and high-variety data streams,

which, according to Wamba et al.⁷,

were shown to

enhance organizational

agility

and

competitive

advantage in their longitudinal research on big data
analytics adoption.

Nevertheless, introducing AI to IS raises complex ethical
and technical issues requiring careful consideration.
The opaque "black box" nature of AI systems has raised
significant concerns

about algorithmic bias

and

accountability, as

shown

in the

meta-

analysis by

Mehrabi

et

al.⁸

of 120

studies documenting discrimination in AI-based hiring
and lending systems.

Aprominent example was

Reuters⁹

report

on Amazon's AI recruitment tool discriminating against

female candidates, while Obermeyer et al.¹⁰ found racial

bias

in

a

widely used

healthcare

algorithm

affecting treatment recommendations. These results
have spurred demands for greater transparency, with
Floridi et al.¹¹ advocating for Explainable AI (XAI)
frameworks and the European Union High-Level Expert
Group on AI¹² establishing strict ethical guidelines for
trustworthy AI development. Alongside these ethical
issues, cybersecurity risks are growing; Schneier¹³ warns
that AI

systems are

vulnerable

to adversarial

attacks where specially crafted inputs can
deceive machine learning models.

IBM

Security's¹⁴ 2023

report

found 38

percent

of financial-sector AI systems had experienced these
attacks, and GDPR Article 22

¹⁵

imposes restrictions on

fully automated decision-making, creating compliance
challenges for organizations implementing AI-driven IS.

The technical barriers to AI adoption in IS are equally
formidable. A 2023 MIT Sloan Management Review

study¹⁶

found 87 percent of organizations face AI

and data

science skills

gaps that

hinder

implementation. Computational requirements present

another hurdle; Cowls et al.¹⁷

estimated that training

large

language

models like GPT-4

requires approximately 10 GWh of energy - equivalent
to annual electricity consumption of 1,000 average U.S.
households - raising questions about environmental
sustainability. Workforce resistance compounds these

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

155

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

challenges; Frey and Osborne's¹⁸

study predicted 47

percent of U.S. jobs contain automatable tasks,
creating concerns among workers.

These adoption challenges vary significantly by industry.

Topol¹⁹

highlights AI's diagnostic

accuracy

improvements while noting FDA validation typically
requires

18 months²⁰.

Meanwhile, Kagermann et

al.²¹ show AI-powered

smart

factories achieve 50%

faster

defect

detection,

and the Forbes

AI

Index²² reports 35% revenue growth from personalized
recommendation systems.

Potential solutions emerge from new research
directions. Dellermann et al.²³ propose human-AI
collaboration

frameworks that

augment human

decision-

making, while Shi et al.²⁴

explore edge

AI for decentralized processing to address latency and
privacy concerns. At the forefront of innovation,

Biamonte

et

al.²⁵

investigate quantum

machine

learning's potential

to

transform pattern

recognition. Growing emphasis on ethical AI is reflected
in

Russell and Norvig's²⁶

advocacy for human-centered

design and

Arrieta

et

al.'s²⁷

development

of XAI

frameworks for model interpretability. Researchers are
also examining broader societal impacts, with Stone et

al.²⁸

analyzing adaptive

learning

systems in

education

and Zhang et al.²⁹

optimizing smart city traffic

and energy management.

The regulatory landscape is evolving in response. Jobin

et al.'s³⁰

review of 84 AI ethics guidelines reveals

significant global variation, while Cath et al.³¹ call
for harmonized

legal

frameworks to

ensure accountability. Industry-specific

regulations

like the FDA's³² precertification program for AI medical
devices represent innovative approaches. Meanwhile,
technical

solutions are

being

developed,

including the adversarial

debiasing

techniques examined by Zhang et al.³³ and differential
privacy frameworks studied by

Dwork et al.³⁴

AI implementation

strategies

must

consider organizational

context.

Alsheibani

et

al.³⁵

identify four

maturity

stages for AI

adoption, while

Benbya

et

al.³⁶

emphasize cross-

functional integration. The workforce implications are

complex,

with

Wilson

et

al.³⁷

documenting

successful reskilling

programs and Acemoglu

et

a

l.³⁸

analyzing macroeconomic effects of automation.

Sustainability concerns are now paramount. Vinuesa et

al.³⁹

demonstrate AI's potential

for climate

change

mitigation, while

Strubell

et

al.⁴⁰

quantify the

environmental costs

of large-scale

model

training. These findings have prompted calls for greener
AI, as articulated by

Schwartz et al.⁴¹

and implemented

in initiatives like

Google's⁴² AI for Social Good program.

Future research must address critical gaps. Dwivedi et

al.⁴³

highlight the need for longitudinal studies of

organizational impacts, while

Raisch et al.⁴⁴

call for

deeper

examination

of human-AI

collaboration. Technical challenges persist, as shown
by

Szegedy

et

al.'s⁴⁵

work

on adversarial

examples and

Goodfellow

et

al.'s⁴⁶

research

on defensive distillation.

AI-powered IS have societal implications beyond

organizations.

Zuboff⁴⁷

analyzes surveillance

capitalism risks, while

Taddeo et al.⁴⁸

examine digital

governance

frameworks. These

considerations

underscore the importance of AI systems that align with
societal values while delivering business value. As the
field evolves, the interplay between technological
capabilities,

ethical considerations,

and

organizational realities

will

shape AI's

future in information systems.

3.

Methodology

The research design that this study utilizes is qualitative-
dominant, data-driven research design where the study
is based on systematic synthesis of peer-reviewed
literature, case analysis across sectors and secondary
data accessed through high-quality academic and
industry websites. Considering that Artificial Intelligence
(AI) integration into Information Systems (IS) requires a
multidimensional approach in tackling (including
technical, organizational, ethical, and regulatory areas),
this study follows an explora-tory and analytical style of
evaluation of the transforma-tional capabilities as well
as operational issues attributed to AI-enabled IS
environments. The research strategy is organized in such
a way that it guarantees the triangulation of the
knowledge provided by empirical evidence, longitudinal
studies, and real-life implementations, thus contributing
to an adequate understanding of the impacts of AI on IS
architectures and governance structures.

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

156

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

Figure 02: Methodological Framework for Evaluating AI-IS Integration

Figure Description:

This structured flowchart illustrates

the research methodology used in the paper, detailing
the qualitative research design, data sourcing, thematic
coding in NVivo, and ethical considerations -
complementing the Methodology section's emphasis
on rigor and triangulation.

The study design reflects the multi-stage qualitative
content analysis framework, which permits the
classification of main trends, their comparison, and
synthesis of themes across existing academic works and
in the industry sources. Particularly, this research is
informed by a div of re-search that consists of over 100
documents, i.e., journal articles, white papers, and
technical reports sifted through relevance, credibility,
and publication within the past ten years (2015-2025).
Such criteria as publication in Q1 or Q2 journals included
in Scopus, Web of Science, or IEEE Xplore, and the
practical relevance of the publication to either
implementation of AI in organizational IS or quantifiable
results of such inclusion were also chosen. Three steps
of screening were followed: the relevance of the
abstracts check, the methodology validation, and the
concluding step of the methodological clarity and
authoritative precision inclusion. Research findings like
those of Davenport, Esteva et al., and Kager-mann et al.
were given priority because of their identification of
quantitative results within the sector, and meta-

analyses studies like Mehrabi et al. 8, as well as
systematic studies like Jobin et al., were also included to
analyze cross-sectoral trends and ethical theories.

The main method of data collection was the retrieval of
secondary data that was authorized by many reputable
sources such as McKinsey Global Institute, Deloitte In-
sights, MIT Sloan Management Review, IBM Security
Reports, and the governmental repositories such as FDA,
GDPR documentation, and the directions of AI by the
European Commission. The data sources were chosen by
their consistency

in terms of

data-reporting

mechanisms, transparency of methods, and the
popularity of referencing in peer-reviewed publications.
In such a case, statistics of operational efficiency
mentioned in McKinsey as known as the probability of
energy cost calculations of AI model training as
presented in Cowls et al. by proven to be true and
correct by crosschecking with at least one other high-
impact source.

Regarding the methods of analysis, the given re-search
used the layered thematic coding technique via the use
of the NVivo 14 software. coding was structured
according to 6 main topics as revealed by literature
review: (1) AI-based transformation of IS architecture,
(2) efficiency and performance metrics, (3) ethical and
regulatory issues, (4) technological obstacles of

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

157

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

adoption, (5) human-AI collaboration, and (6)
sustainability. Under each theme, sub-codes were
coined on basis of highly repetitive con-structs like
explainable AI, algorithmic bias, enterprise agility, and
compliance risk. The same concepts were interrelated
by utilization of pattern matching and axial coding to
demonstrate

the

invisible

structures

and

interconnections between various facets of AI-IS
interaction. As possible, descriptive statistics found in
relevant studies were taken out and reported as tables
and charts in the section Results as close as possible to
the original representations of data to eliminate their
misinterpretation.

Ethical considerations have been given in all aspects of
the study, especially when handling the emotional
subject of discrimination in the use of AI in decision
making and the ethical threat of being spied. Datasets
were used which are currently publicly available, duly
referenced, and it did not collect or process any personal
data. Human studies were only included in those studies
where requirements of ethical approval were stated by
the original authors as verified by institutional review
board (IRB) statements or ethical compliance
statements.

It has been understood that this methodological
approach has its limitations. Considerably, the reliance
on secondary data poses a threat of publication bias and
exclusion of the research information that is not
published, but which can be valuable. In addition, lack of
primary interviews and surveys referred to in the paper
can lead to certain inadequacy regarding very dynamic
organizational views, or regional peculiarities of
regulation. Nonetheless, these weaknesses are
addressed using methodological triangulation, in
addition to high-quality and longitudinal studies, and
that different sources of such contributions were
intentionally included, covering a range of sec-tors, such
as healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and education.

Lastly, methodological rigor of the approach allows to be
compatible with peer-review expectations due to the
transparency, replicability, and validity in the research
process. Thematic synthesis as a multilayered method of
an empirical approach and data triangulation with an
ethical adherence completes the fact that the results of
the study are not only empirically ground-ed but also
meaningful theoretically. The ability to relate emergent
trends to thoroughly developed frameworks and
quantitative evidence provides a solid basis of making

sense of the effects of the AI adoption on the
contemporary Information Systems in a way that is both
theoretically sound and efficient to apply in practice.

4.

Ai-Driven Transformation of Information Systems
Architecture

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has resulted in the structural
shift of designing, implementing and scaling of
Information Systems (IS) within organizations. The IS
architecture used to adhere to a linear and rule-oriented
patterns aimed at processing and storage of rather
immovable information. With the entry of the AI, and
more specifically machine learning (ML), natural
language processing (NLP), and computer vision,
however, IS architectures become versatile, intelligent,
and can autonomously operate in real-time. This
transition signifies the shift of rigid, rules-based logics to
flexible, based on data, and predictive systems and this
has changed the operational backbone of the
enterprises in the contemporary context. Recently, AI
has become integrated into many levels of IS design,
including data-gathering and preparation and higher-
level analytics and automated decision support
modules, producing systems that are no longer just
reactive but are pro-active and even prescriptive in
character.

At the center of this change is the re-definition of data
pipelines within IS. The AI models, especially the ones
executed with deep learning, entail huge amounts of
various and high-velocity data to operate appropriately.
In turn, the conventional Ex-tract-Transform-Load (ETL)
processes are giving way to dynamic data ingestion
frameworks that can process both structured and
unstructured data at real-time. As an example,
companies are starting to implement AI-powered data
lakes that are continuously aggregated data that is fed
by different sensors, user logs, social media,
transactional databases, and IoT gadgets. Such a
transition requires a new architecture of backend
infrastructures with cloud-native and hybrid-cloud
environments to provide on-demand elastic computing
power and scalability. Gartner predicts that more than
75 percent of data generated at the enterprise will be
pro-cessed at the edge by 2025, with AI use cases based
on the need of low-latency and context-aware pro-
cessing. These trends highlight the rising popularity of
distributed computing approaches, e.g., edge AI and
federated learning, that allow treating decisions in real-
time near the data source, and, thus, improve speed,

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

158

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

security, and independence of IS operations.

Introductions of AI have also adopted microservices-
based IS architectures, in which mono-lithic systems are
broken into small services that can be deployed
individually. Such a modularity enables AI algorithms to
be placed as independent functions modules like a
recommendation engine, a fraud detector, or anomaly
detection service within other more extensive IS
ecosystems. Such a strategy does not only improve scale
but also facilitates continuous integration and
deployment (CI/CD), which allows organizations to
reiterate and develop AI functionality quickly in line with
changing operation requirements. An example would be
that with the retail industry, the AI-powered
recommendation engines can get continually optimized
depending on the real-time customer action, and in
manufacturing, the predictive maintenance modules are
updated continuously depending on the new sets of
sensors. These microservices are usually containerized
with tools like Docker and Kubernetes that allows a
smooth deployment, scaling and fault-tolerance.

AI would also be pushing the incorporation of cogni-tive
abilities into IS by means of, namely, NLP, speech
recognition, and computer vision. Enterprise systems
are no longer uncommon systems to see chatbots and
virtual assistants as interfaces, which improves user
experience and eliminates the need to rely on human
assistance. These sys-tems combine the power of AI in
knowing the intentions of the user, deriving semantic
meaning, and providing a conversational and context-
aware response and this alters the manner in which
users interface with information systems. Enterprise
resource planning (ERP) tools have AI-powered bots that
will automate some routine queries, create financial
projections, and alert to compliance risks due to
changing patterns of transactions. In the same way, CRM
systems with AI have dynamic lead scoring, churn
forecasting, and sentiment analyses, providing tailored
engagement approaches heretofore impossible to
generate using the static rule-based logic.

The other noteworthy thing about the results of using AI
to facilitate the change within IS is the involvement of
adaptive learning processes. Artificial intelligence-
enabled IS also continuously learn by taking into account
the data input and feedback loop which is contrary to
the usual logic-based conventional systems. The ability
at personal learning makes the information processing
more precise, appropriate and efficient in the long run.

An example is that the AI systems applied in cyberse-
curity training to detect new forms of threats on top of
the dynamic nature of the attacks thus strengthening
the intrusion detection systems and being less
dependent on the updating of rules by humans.
Correspondingly, supply chain management systems
have the capability of dynamic reshaping of logistics
routing relative to any real-time demand, weather, or
geo-political disruptions. Reinforcement learning and
on-line learning algorithms make these adaptive
characteristics a possibility as systems can automatically
better themselves without any need of human
reprogramming.

These architectural developments bring with them great
benefits but their complexity limits the way in which the
systems are governed, interoperable and maintained.
The existence of various AI elements in a variety of
platforms and gadgets would require a strong use of
Application

Programming

Inter-faces

(APIs),

standardization

procedures

and

orchestration

mechanisms. Besides, it is not uncommon that AI
models behave like black boxes and it is difficult to
reverse-engineer the decision-making process in the IS.
Such lack of transparency poses doubts to system
account-ability particularly in areas of high stakes such
as healthcare services, financial systems, and criminal
law enforcement. In response, organizations are turning
towards the integration of Explainable AI (XAI)
frameworks in their attempt to promote transparency
and auditability in AI-driven IS. These frameworks
include visualizations, importances of features, and
interpretable models that assist the stakeholders to
know the manner in which certain decisions were
reached thus making the systems actions conform to the
ethical and regulatory requirements.

Moreover, AI-integrated architectures pose the
necessity of the resilience and fault tolerance of the
systems. The traditional IS suffered from easily
identifiable locations of failure and how to fix it, whereas
an AI system, particularly those powered by neural
networks, may act in an unpredictable manner when
subjected to adversarial inputs or when presented with
data out of distribution. The strong case of testing,
adversarial validation, and never-ending monitoring
proves to be the vital part of contemporary IS design.
Companies are also taking the use of AI Ops (Artificial
Intelligence for IT Operations) tools, which work by
monitoring and tracking the performance of the
systems,

identifying

the

abnormalities,

and

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

159

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

automatically remediating the situation. Not only does
such automation assure greater uptime and service
quality, it also minimizes operational overhead in data-
intensive and large-scale operation.

Summing up, AI is not just an addition to Information
Systems, it is the very nature of their architecture, logic
and operation-al philosophy that changes. Whether it is
real-time, edge-based type of data processing or
microservices, cognitive interfaces, and adaptive
learning, AI has reshaped the capabilities IS has in terms
of speed, intelligence, and autonomy. This change
however also requires new governance systems,
technical infrastructures and ethical protection so that
the AI-driven IS is transparent, trustworthy and goals
oriented. The extent to which enterprises are able to use
the power of intelligence strategically in this era of ever
greater data-centric opportunities will depend on how IS
architecture evolves in its turn.

5.

Business Value and Operational Efficiency Through
Ai in Information Systems

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into
Information Systems (IS) has emerged as a major source
of tracking the business value that can help the
organizations to improve their efficiency of operation,
lower expenses as well as speed and accuracy of
decision making along with providing competitive
advantage in the growing market. The conventional IS
have been taking care of business processes by assisting
structured data processing, record-keeping and simple
automation. Nevertheless, the implementation of AI
adds intelligent features that go beyond these
functionality, enabling systems to make their own
changes and adjustments to run most streamlined and
optimized processes based on available real-time data.
This transformation is not a mere technological reboot
but a strategic one that has a long-term consequence on
their productivity, profitability and the resilience of their
enterprises.

Along with the idea to use AI to improve operational
workflows via intelligent automation, it is one of the
most valuable contributions of AI to IS. The algorithms
of machine learning installed in IS platforms allow
mining the historical data patterns, exposing
inefficiencies, and suggest the ways of the process
improvement. Take, as an example, AI-driven robotic
process automation (RPA), which became the most
common way of automating repetitive work on the
finance, HR, procurement and customer service

functionality. According to the research conducted by
Deloitte regarding financial institutions, the accuracy of
fraud detection has increased by 35 percent using AI
enabled RPA systems by mainly minimizing the false
positive levels by constantly learning older patterns of
generated frauds. Simultaneously, according to the
estimation of McKinsey Global Institute, AI adoption
returned to early adopters 20-30 percent in operational
efficiencies, simply because it is possible to automate
complex business rules with the help of AI, as well as
interpret real-time data.

Predictive maintenance systems that use AI to
accomplish

asset

management

within

the

manufacturing

industry

have

transformed

the

manufacturing sector by integrating their system with IS
platforms operated by business enterprises. Equipment
has sensors placed on them, gathering enormous
amounts of data on temperature, vibration, and
performance model parameters. AI models then
interpret the data to avert future failures or prevent
them in the first place. This has helped the industries
adhere to preventive maintenance practices over
reactive ones, which limit downtimes that are
unexpected and also prolong the life of the assets. A
documented 40 per cent reduction in equipment
downtime attributable to AI-driven IS in the industrial
environment is evidence of a clear business case
supporting AI investment by businesses. On the same
note, AI self-scheduling and inventory systems enable
the management of logistics in just-in-time, which
enhances throughput and minimizes wastage. Such
objective advances have made AI supply chain
optimization tools rapidly gain popularity, with post-
pandemic supply chain shocks and the need to make
operations agile, only expediting the process.

One of the most important IS offers that increases value
to businesses is the AI-driven decision support system
(DSS). These systems integrate organizationally
structured

enterprise

data

with

unstructured

extraneous data sources, including social media trends,
business trends, and customer reviews, and provide
real-time dashboards and predictive insights to
executives. These systems have natural language
processing (NLP) abilities to derive sentiment, anomaly
detection, and recommend strategic actions. This
enables the managers to make quick and more
intelligent decision-making abilities particularly in the
scenario of high-velocity procedures such as e-
commerce, investment banking and crisis management.

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

160

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

As an example, Esteva et al. showed that AI models
incorporated into the healthcare IS were capable of
diagnosing skin cancer as accurately as a dermatologist,
which is a kind of diagnostic decision support that does
enhance treatment further and leads to patient
outcomes, which is of both clinical and economic
importance.

Another major element of customer engagement and
patronage, i.e., personalization, has been revolutionized
with the help of AI-powered IS as well. Collaborative
filtering recommender systems and deep learning
recommender systems form part of IS in the retail and
digital services market that would provide individualized
product offers, content feeds and marketing offers.
According to the Forbes A.I Index, those kinds of systems
have increased revenues by up to 35 percent as they
have been able to match product offerings with user
preferences. These AI functionalities are dependent
upon real-time manipulation of behavioral information,
click-streams, and purchasing history and are dynamic
with the evolution of recommendations as user profile

changes. This does not just drive more executions, but
also boosts customer satisfaction, retention and lifetime
value, which are main measures in business health.

The financial industry provides additional liquidity on
the effect that AI has in the IS efficiency and profitability.
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based software added to
financial information systems (IS) does credit scoring in
real time, identifies anomalous transactions, and
supervises algorithmic trading plans. The systems are
used to process enormous quantities of transaction
information with millisecond response, and they are
faster and more accurate than human analysts. Well-
respected banks like JPMorgan Chase and HSBC claimed
that the use of AI in IS helped save up to hundreds of
millions of dollars by eliminating the risks and saving
several millions of dollars. In addition, AI chatbots
integrated into the banking system then ask and answer
millions of customer requests per year, contribute to the
reduction of operational costs, and increase the
accessibility of services.

Figure 03: Operational Gains from AI-Powered IS Across Sectors (2015

–

2023)

Figure Description:

This timeline diagram captures real-

world improvements such as diagnostic accuracy in
healthcare and fraud detection in finance, aligning with
the Business Value and Operational Efficiency section to
demonstrate how AI-driven IS have produced
measurable industry-wide benefits.

In addition to direct operational gains, AI-enhanced IS
can help organizations be more strategic by being able
to react faster to the changes in the exterior
environment. As an example, AI-based scenario
modeling systems can enable companies to test out

different versions of the future, e.g., market downturns,
supply chain impacts, or regulatory changes and do
planning in advance. Such tactical vision is priceless in
the area of volatile businesses such as energy,
pharmaceutical, and logistics where flexibility and
readiness can be the determining factor of survival. Data
from the longitudinal study conducted by Wamba et al.
showed that the greater organizational agility was
associated with AI-enabled IS, and the companies that
had developed more advanced AI capabilities had a
better chance of repositioning amid crises into new

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

161

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

opportunities.

Notably, business value of AI augmented IS does not
concern only big companies. Small and medium
enterprises (SMEs) too are taking advantage of cloud-
based AI tools incorporated in their IS to gain access to
impactful analytics, automation in their buyer
interactions, and promotion of highly successful
marketing activities carrying no IT load. The ability to
add AI functionality to mainstream IS functions has been
brought increasingly to the everyday business with
skilled providers, like Salesforce Einstein and Zoho Zia;
the small business now enjoys an easy access to AI. This
has opened up the market to the use of limited firms,
where the key benefits of efficiencies and insights have
been earned by large firms with in-house data science
groups.

However, to achieve these all, it is imperative to
eliminate central facilitators of value capture such as
data quality, skills of the workforce, and system
integration. Inaccurate data that is not curated well can
affect the accurateness of the model and workforce
resistance can cause slack adoption. Furthermore,
organizations should make sure that AI applications
meet their general business strategy and are managed
by proper policies and ethical protection. Clear results
on return on AI investment (ROAI) are essential to
sustain the executive sponsorship as well as inform
future investments. Accordingly, AI business value
realization in IS is not exactly a technological effect but
a result of the whole planning, inter-functional
cooperation, and flexible leadership.

To sum up, the introduction of AI into Information
Systems is promoting the development of business
values and operation efficiency to an unprecedented
scale of business effectiveness. AI is helping IS become
smarter, so to speak, with automated decision-making
and predictive maintenance, personalized services and
strategic agility, turning IS into intelligent systems that
actively determine outcomes in the business. The
existence of governance-, skills-, and integration-related
challenges notwithstanding, an economic justification of
AI-infused IS deployment is becoming clearer.
Companies able to integrate AI into their IS do not only
achieve efficiency at operational levels, but a lasting
competitive advantage in a rapidly changing digital
economy.

6.

Security, Ethics, And Governance Challenges

In spite of the exciting challenges posed by the

incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Information
Systems (IS), there is thorny proliferation of security
vulnerability, ethical issues and governance as
companies embrace and allow the integration of AI into
Information System architectural, operational and
organizational changes. Today, the business value and
the efficiency of operations that AI-powered IS makes
possible have been well documented, but the potential
risks posed by new technology and certain tensions
which have not yet been resolved are hidden behind
these advantages. With the organizations relying on
intelligent systems to complete more and more crucial
decision-making processes, there is a lot at stake in
terms of transparency, accountability, data integrity,
and compliance. In the absence of a solid system that
deals with such problems, even the systems informed
alleviating performance can damage trust, plague
organizations with legal responsibilities, and leverage
pre-existing social wrongs.

The lack of transparency of decision-making by an
algorithm, commonly known as the black box problem,
can be classified as one of the most urgent ethical issues
in AI-integrated IS. In contrast to classic IS, where
processes and rules are clear and can be audited, much
of the AI, especially deep learning ones, works by
recurring, non-linear interaction in millions of
parameters and explains why the outputs are hard to
understand and justify. This unexplainability is especially
dangerous in areas where decisions of AI systems
directly influence human lives and well-being, including
such spheres as healthcare, finance, and criminal justice.
As an example, the widely discussed case of Amazon
recruitment algorithm cited in Reuters showed that the
systematically provided training was biased against
female applicants and downgraded their rank.
Correspondingly, Obermeyer et al. discovered racial
discrimination of health application in medical care
related to healthcare algorithm that impacts millions of
patients and systematically referred Black patients less
frequently to advanced care using identical clinical
evidence. These cases demonstrate the ethical necessity
to create Explainable AI (XAI) frameworks to make sure
that AI - integrated IS will be transparent, fair, and
responsible.

This problem can be complemented by the more general
problem of algorithmic bias, which arises when training
data capture the pre-existing social or historical
inequalities. IS anchoring AI systems may accidentally
train them to increase such biases, and the outcome

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

162

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

may be discriminatory against the marginalized groups.
Mehrabi et al. conducted a meta-analysis of 120
research and observed consistent bias patterns in the
application of hiring, lending, policing, and healthcare.
In the absence of biases detection and mitigation
mechanisms, the transformation of IS by AI has the risk
of institutionalizing discrimination on scale. This does
not only go against ethical standards but it can even be
against an anti-discriminatory legislation in a state with
an emergency regulation system. European Union The
High-Level Expert Group on AI has responded by
proposing principles of fairness, transparency, and
accountability, which are being progressively handed
over into legally binding regulations, including the EU AI
Act and Article 22 of the GDPR, which prohibits entirely
automated decisions without human intervention.

Data control and privacy is the other vital area of
interest. To provide accurate predictions and insights, AI
models flourish on massive amount of explicitly
detailed, and in many cases, sensitive data involving user
catalogs. The concentrating and processing of such data
in the IS however subjects organizations to an increased
risk of breaches, misuse, and failure to meet the
regulations. According to the IBM Security report of
2023, 38 percent of the AI systems used in the financial
industry had been attacked by an adversary, who
introduced data into it in a way that would cause the
machine learning models to make an incorrect
conclusion. The attacks not only compromise system
integrity but they also lose user trust. Further, such new
methods as model inversion and membership inference
can be employed to infer sensitive training data,
threatening the data anonymity. With the increase in AI
application, the protection of data (i.e., GDPR, California
Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and industry-specific
requirements) is a complex but essential component of
IS governance.

To this effect, organizations are starting to adopt
privacy-protective mechanisms in their AI-infused IS.
They consist of differential privacy that adds statistical
noise to data outputs and federated learning, an
approach to the training of decentralized models devoid
of data centralization. Dwork et al. and Zhang et al. have
already demonstrated that these means are very
effective in weighting between model performance and
privacy assurance. Still, its use is not so widespread
because of complexity and absence of standardized
frameworks. The issue of governance is also made
murky by the cross-border data flows that introduce

situations of jurisdictional conflicts and legal
uncertainties, especially to multinational companies
that have to work with different regulatory regimes.

The other arising issue is the environmental
sustainability of IS that has integration with AI.
According to Cowls et al. and Strubell et al., the training
of large AI models is an energy-poor and carbon-intense
process that hurts sustainability objectives. As an
example, it takes more than 10 GWh of power to train a
single transformer model, which is the same amount of
power used by 1 000 U.S. households in a year. Such
numbers beg vital questions surrounding the ecological
impact of commercial application of AI. As the world
moves towards showing their sustainability pledges,
there is increased pressure on organizations to go green
in their AI conduct, including utilizing energy-efficient
machines, minimizing model structures, and utilizing
carbon-neutral data facilities. According to Vinuesa et al.
and Schwartz et al., sustainable AI adoption should
become part of IS governance policies in case the long-
term positive results of digital transformation are to be
achieved without increasing the environmental damage.

The aspect of human labor in the AI-IS integration
process adds more governance issues revolving around
human control, skill shortages, and organisational
culture. According to Frey and Osborne, around half of
the jobs in the U.S. sector have automated activities,
which results in a fear of mass unemployment and a job-
related social tremor. Opposition to the use of AI can be
based on doubting the usefulness and the fear of losing
a job, a fact that may delay the process and reduce ROI.
According to Wilson et al. and Acemoglu et al., to reduce
these risks, adequate implementation of change
management as well as reskilling strategies is required.
Nevertheless, most organizations do not have the
coherent governance structure to support such
transitions, and because of it, their strategies are
haphazard, and their potential cannot be fulfilled.
Governance systems should thus go beyond the
technicality to incorporate social sustainability and good
employment systems.

Lastly, a lack of uniform AI regulation with common
standards leads to the disjointed and uneven regulatory
div of law. A study by Jobin et al. counted more than
84 different regulations of AI ethics on a worldwide
scale, differing in the scope, terms, and enforceability
levels significantly. This smattering of conventions
makes it harder to adhere to international constraints,

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

163

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

and it brings unpredictability in cross-boundary AI
applications. The harmonisation of the AI regulation
systems has been addressed by Cath et al. and the OECD
as they promote international cooperation and
responsibilities sharing models. There are industry-
specific regulatory inventions that have the potential to
provide good guides, including the FDA precertification
program of AI-based medical devices, although scaling
and adapting these programs may be difficult unless
they are aligned with all stakeholders, including
regulators, developers, and end-users.

To conclude, with all the transformative power that
integration of AI into Information Systems promises, it
requires a paradigm shift regarding security, ethics, and
governing practices. Those issues are complex they go
across the board as far as algorithmic transparency and
discrimination to data security, environmental effects,
and job loss. Computational and technical safeguards
are not the only way to overcome such issues, and the
combination of technical protection and ethical vision
and regulatory enforcement is a holistic approach that is
more appropriate. The companies should actively invest
in explainable AI technologies, privacy-enhancing
methods, sustainable infrastructures and workforce
approaches so that the AI-enhanced IS are not only
functioning effectively, but also ethically. With the
digital environment becoming more dynamic, the
resilience of the governance system within an
organization will become the most important factor in
both the long-term viability of the organizations using AI
and its social acceptability.

7.

Discussion

Taking advantage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a
paradigm shift in the future of the digital infrastructure
that significantly transforms the way organizations
collect, process, and take action on information, which
is applied to Information Systems (IS). As passed by this
research, there are various implications in the form of
operational, strategic, as well as societal consequences
of AI-enabled IS, which vary between quantifiable
efficiencies to deeper issues of governance and ethics.
The present discussion contextualizes the findings in the
general terminology of the academic and practical field,
integrates the knowledge revealed in the literature and
case studies, and comments on the ways how the
identified trends can be used to supplement the
knowledge base and the avenues to develop in the
future.

The measurements collected in the paper and used in
demonstrating the empirical evidence are strong
reinforcements to the claim that IS with AI help to
augment operations and business value to a
considerable degree. The real-time capability to analyze
both structured and unstructured data at large volumes
enables AI to move IS to a new level of transactional
processing into the boundaries of prediction alone,
autonomous decision-making, and personalized service
provision. These benefits are validated in three areas:
manufacturing (Lee et al.), finance (Deloitte), and
healthcare (Esteva et al.). These examples show that AI
will help to increase speed and accuracy as well as cut
costs, and boost user satisfaction- direct contributors to
organization

competitiveness.

Moreover,

the

disintegration of AI-IS with microservices, cloud-based
systems, and edge computing due to international
tendencies of utilizing scalable, modular, agile
technology environment. The viability of AI in IS, with
references to such sources as McKinsey and the Forbes
AI Index, is hence substantial and growing especially in
the case of organizations capable of linking technical
capabilities to organizational strategies.

Nevertheless, the potential to transform the IS domain
with the help of AI-augmented IS is not without a great
deal of challenges. An innovation versus accountability
balancing is one of the most tenacious tensions. As
argued, the black-box nature of most AI systems poses
the risk of creating an accusation of opacity in the
decision-making process, which brings in question issues
of fairness, interpretability and accountability, especially
where the stakes are high and the decisions have social
consequences. Alarming discrimination expressed in
recruitment algorithms (Reuters) and decision systems
in healthcare (Obermeyer et al.) demonstrate that the
technical merit of the developer is not sufficient to
ensure the integrity of ethical conduct. It correlates with
the conclusions made by Mehrabi et al. and Floridi et al.
who claim that the absence of explainability and
transparency destroyed stakeholder trust and could
trigger the emergence of dangerous outcomes. They are
not entirely theoretical matters but now tend to become
regulatory, which can be seen in the appearance of legal
frameworks, like Article 22 of the GDPR and the EU AI
Act, that require explainability, human control, and
auditing of AI systems being implemented in IS. The
point of implication is that organizations are to
institutionalize ethics-design and governance structures
into the architecture of their information systems

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

164

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

instead of responding to them as external requirements
inducted to corporate compliance.

The importance of organizational readiness in
determining the success of adoption of AI is also
enhanced in the discussion. According to the idea that
has been expressed by the MIT Sloan Management
Review and Alsheibani et al., a number of organizations
are not ready to operationalize AI in their IS due to a lack
of data maturity, computational resources, and skilled
staff. Complicated integration is also compounded by
the existence of legacy systems, disjointed data
landscape, and opposition by workforce, especially in
those firms where the cultural readiness to digitalization
has not taken place comprehensively. This fact demands
the comprehensive approach to change management
with references to technical, structural, and human
aspects of AI incorporation. Agile enterprises have
witnessed longitudinal benefits (Wamba et al.) of the
approach and positive outcomes of reskilling programs
(Wilson et al.) indicate that the practice is viable and
fruitful once put in place in a strategic manner. Thus,
initiatives in terms of implementation in the future
should be focused on cross-functional collaboration,
frequent training, and the dedication of the leadership
to create the environment that helps support AI-induced
innovation.

One of the insights of the study is the issue of AI
integration

connected

with

sustainability:

environmental as well as social. The use of large
amounts of energy during training of large AI models
(Cowls et al., Strubell et al.) is paradoxical, as AI becomes
more efficient in its operations, but its infrastructure can
be against the wider climate agenda. Since organizations
are transitioning to ESG (Environmental, Social,
Governance) standards and climate responsibility,
earlier green AI solutions, including the streamlining of

model architecture and switching to green-powered
data centers, will have to be included in the IS planning.
In the same context, the automation-driven
displacement anxiety (Frey and Osborne) emphasizes
the necessity of all-inclusive policies that guarantee the
maintenance of human dignity and the preservation of
jobs. Along with this, recent trends that adhere to
human-AI collaboration frameworks (Dellermann et al.)
and, more generally, human-centered design principles
(Russell and Norvig), suggest that there is a growing
agreement that the role of AI should be to enhance, but
not to supplant human intelligence in IS. The point of
view does not only makes it more acceptable but also
makes sure that AI is being used as an empowering tool
and not a destabilizing one.

Academically, the research contributes to the literature
of digital transformation with the integrated view that
shows the dualistic nature of AI in the anthropology of
IS as a force of performance and a source of systemic
risk. Previously conducted studies have usually placed
the focus on the advantages or the ethical dilemmas of
AI as separate entities; the present paper fills the gap by
demonstrating how these aspects are interlinked and
should be addressed simultaneously. It is in consensus
with a request of Dwivedi et al. and Raisch et al. to
conduct a longitudinal study of multi-stakeholder-based
analysis that can show the changing effects of AI over
time. Moreover, the ample use of real-life case examples
provide enhanced practicality of discussion, and solid
ground on which the organizations can tailor it to their
circumstances. Similarly this study also helps to develop
a more mature, sophisticated idea of what it means to
integrate AI into IS as it is not a single-off
implementation effort but the complex evolution of
technology, people, and systems.

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

165

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

Figure 04: Comparative Maturity of AI-IS Across Key Performance Dimensions

Figure Description:

This bar chart presents a side-by-

side comparison of six critical dimensions - efficiency,
explainability, security, fairness, scalability, and
sustainability -

underscoring the Discussion section’s

analysis of uneven advancement and trade-offs in AI-IS
development.

Lastly, the discussion shows that governance will be the
distinguishing feature of whether AI-augmented IS
become systems of value creation or means of risk
amplification. According to Jobin et al. and Cath et al.,
the existing regulatory situation has been described as a
patchwork as there are more than 80 variants of ethical
guidelines and lack of uniformity in legal interpretation
due to jurisdiction. Consistency of the standards, along
with the responsibility of the organization, will play a
critical role in preventing the ambiguity of compliance
and also making sure that the deployment of AI is not
merely legal but also socially sound. Promising
trajectories have been pointed at by regulatory
innovations like the FDA precertification program AI or
the creation of differential privacy and adversarial
debiasing methods (Dwork et al.; Zhang et al.). However,
such tools have to be incorporated in a larger
governance framework, which should include risk
management, stakeholder accountability, ethical audit,
and transparency to the masses.

To sum up, the discussion confirms that AI influences on
Information System is transformational, multi-faceted,
and profoundly contextual. Although the potential
technological solutions are beyond any doubt, their

actual use will depend on the way that the organizations
treat the mesh of operational efficiency, ethical
responsibility, security, sustainability, and governance.
Technical innovation is not the only thing that is needed
to leverage the way forward, institutional maturity is
also needed, interdisciplinary cooperation and
normative clarity. Comprehensively addressing such
dimensions, AI-integrated IS are potentially capable of
meeting their potential of supporting intelligent,
responsive, and ethically sound digital realms

8.

Results

In Information Systems (IS), the Artificial Intelligence
(AI)-related integrations have introduced the notion of
measurable performance boost in all types of
operational, strategic, and industry-specific metrics. This
chapter displays the empirical results of the researches
of the industry, case examples and scholarly researches
gathered in the course of the review, confined to mere
findings without explanatory remarks. The data have
been summarized in topic areas relative to major areas
which determine performance of an IS as operational
efficiency, cost cutting, accuracy in decision making, risk
management and sustainable impact.

In the manufacturing industry, AI-increased IS
integrations have shown significant increases in
equipment reliability and automation of processes.
Predictive maintenance systems built as an industrial IS
platforms have cut equipment downtimes to at best by
40 per cent; machine learning models to indicate early

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

166

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

signs of mechanical failure show promising results at
accurately detecting the signs of relevant failures. These
gains are also reflected in 25 percent reduction of the
unscheduled maintenance costs. In the interim,
advanced development of the quality assurance
modules with the help of the AI allowed the rates of the
defects detection to exceed 50 percent by employing
the computer vision systems combined with real-time
analytics, which contributed greatly to the reliability of
the production and minimized waste.

Artificial intelligence (AI) in IS has enhanced the
detection abilities as well as the operation cycle of the
financial services sector. AI-based fraud detection
systems have had up to 35 percent higher accuracy and
a two-fold decrease in the number of false positives
nearly 20 percent. AI-enhanced real time transaction
monitoring systems have had the ability to retrieve high
throughput information channels with average latencies
lower than 150 milliseconds permitting rapid detection
and action of anomalies. AI-enhanced credit scoring
apps also showed improvement in the rates of approvals
and the risk profiling post-AI implementation was 25
percent faster in finding an approval when compared to
a bad rate that has been cut by 15 percent.

Healthcare organizations that have started to utilize AI-
powered IS platforms have claimed to have achieved
large improvements in the diagnostic performance. ai-
based diagnostic tools implemented in radiology and
dermatology information systems have demonstrated
accuracy of the diagnosis similar or even higher than
trained specialists and specific and sensitive applications
are above 90%. IS assisted by AI have been gaining
popularity in hospital activities as they have enabled a
30 percent increase in patient triage, a 20 percent
reduction in the average time spent in the system, and
the growth of the bed turnover rate due to scheduling
and resource assignment improvements. Such efficiency
has led to 10-15 percent cost savings within hospital
management systems, especially the ones where AI
models were employed to predict volumes of admission
and the activation of staffing.

With AI-assisted IS capabilities including recommender
systems and dynamic pricing engines, customer interest
and revenues have been affected directly in retailing and
e-commerce industries. Customized recommendation
systems have also raised the average order value, as
shown by 18 percent, as well as the customer retention
rates, which are likely to go up by around 25 percent.

Dynamic pricing algorithms have provided revenue
increases of 10 -20 per cent by responding to the real-
time market demand, rival pricing, and inventory levels.
The automated customer care support systems with
chatbots and virtual assistants have responded to more
than 70 per cent of customer inquiries without human
contact which lowered the cost and customer care
service by 35 per cent and increased customer
satisfaction by 15 per cent.

AI integration has been critical in logistics and supply
chain information systems, including in forecasting and
route optimization. AI-based demand forecasting
models have shown improvements in forecast accuracy
by 30-40 percent and consequent improvement in
inventory management and reduced stockouts. Use of
AI-based routing tools in last-mile delivery have cut
down delivery time by 25 percent and decreased fuel
requirement by 12 percent by optimizing the routes and
predicting traffic. Such indicators of performance have
led to the overall reduction in logistics cost of between
8 and 15 percent depending on the due scale and
complexity of the operations.

Considering cybersecurity, AI-augmented IS have
demonstrated augmented abilities to survey and
counter threat in real time. Artificial intelligence-driven
threat detection engines have detected network
anomalies with 90 to 95 percent accuracy and response
to incidents by almost 60 percent. Digital security and
security operations centers (SOCs) with and without AI
have successfully reduced an average dwell time of
undetected threat from 109 days to 56 days in large
enterprises and increased the level of successful near-
novelization of threats by 30 percent. These have been
pivotal increment that has helped stem financial losses
in case of security breach and continuity of businesses.

Regarding sustainability, the implementation of AI in IS
has achieved mixed still quantifiable implications. On
the one hand, smart energy management systems that
use AI to monitor and manage them have achieved
energy reduction of 10-18 percent in both commercial
buildings and data centers. In urban areas, the 20
percent boost in recycling levels and the 25 percent drop
in collection route inefficiency using AI-enhanced waste
management systems have also been attained.
Conversely, the energy used during the training of Deep
Learning / big AI models has also come with
environmental compromises. It is estimated that
training one advanced AI model can use as much as 10

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

167

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

GWh of electricity, and the carbon emissions and
eventual long-term ecological consequences are of
concern. However, the possible reduction of these costs

to the environment might be achieved through early
adoption of more efficient training methods and use of
renewable energy in AI infrastructure.

Figure 05: Domain-Specific Performance Metrics of AI-Integrated IS

Figure Description:

This clustered dot plot visualizes real

performance data across five major IS domains,
emphasizing how AI influences subcomponents like cost
reduction, accuracy improvement, and environmental
impact - support

ing the Results section’s presentation of

quantitative findings.

Lastly,

there

are

workforce-related

outcomes

surrounding AI-IS integration that lead to improving
efficiency and exposing risks. Intelligent HRIS systems
have achieved a 30 percent productivity improvement
of talent matching and onboarding times and in
administrative functions productivity gains have
improved by 15 25 percent as a result of automated task
handling. These advantages have however been marked
by the subsidizing of some of the regular job functions
as well which shows the need to have up skills and
workforce transition strategies. Firms with formal
reskilling initiatives had a rate of filling jobs with re-
deployed employees of more than 60 percent and
enhanced worker engagement of 12-15 percent.

All of these quantitative results together demonstrate
the material advantages and functional effects of the
use of AI-integrated IS besides reporting the signs of
potential risks that may be investigated more in the
overall discussion and governance segments.

9.

Limitations And Future Research Directions

Although the incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
into Information Systems (IS) is associated with
significant improvements in efficiencies, the ability to

make decisions, and the strategic dexterity, this paper
does not ignore a number of inherent limitations that
cannot be ignored when interpreting the study results.
These constraints do not merely have a methodological
dimension but inherently represent the larger systemic,
contextual and temporal forces that exist and impact the
changing AI-IS landscape. This section also establishes
the grounds of significant future research following the
disclosure of these limitations that could follow through
the information that has been created in this paper and
clarify and validate them more fully.

One of the main limitations of the research is that it is
based on the secondary data and published empirical
results. Although the methodology used selective but
rigorous usage of peer reviewed articles, industry
report, and real life/case studies, primary data collection
methodology such as interview, individual surveys, and
observation was not used. As a result, the analysis can
be misrepresenting timely organizational dynamics,
implementation peculiarities to a sector, and the
problems that have not been formalised in the academic
publications yet. In spite of the fact that the
triangulation of high-quality sources facilitates the
mitigation of this problem, the aspect of further
research can be seen in adding primary data collection
to the research to provide it with the increased level of
contextual granularity and stakeholder inclusion,
including IT managers, systems users, data scientists,
and governance professionals.

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

168

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The other limitation is the inconsistency in the data
reporting standard and measurement metrics in the
similar sources reviewed. Although several of the cited
studies are quantitative studies on performance
indicators (e.g. efficiency gains, cost cutbacks, or
predictive performance), there is frequently a problem
of a lack of consistency in the definition of the indicators,
their measurement, or their benchmarking. An example
would be that efficiency on the one hand would be
measured differently in a hospital information system
over and above say a logistics platform. Such
inconsistencies pose a problem when it comes to
comparative study and meta level analysis. In future,
efforts must be made to develop universal scoring grids
or industry-wise performance scorecards of AI-IS
applications, which will allow making more effective
inter-industry comparisons and policy benchmarking.

One should also consider the time constraint of the
research. AI technologies and especially machine
learning, deep learning, and large-scale language
models are heading in an explosive growth direction.
New types of architecture changing the landscape of
what is viable in IS environments are still being
developed, transform the transformer-based models or
edge computing frameworks. Thus, the results
described in this paper can become outdated with the
introduction of newer tools and paradigms. Moreover,
recently, the field of generative AI and reinforcement
learning has received new breakthroughs, which were
not the main subject of this investigation and introduce
a whole new set of opportunities and risks to be
analyzed separately. Their future research ought to be
oriented to longitudinal studies on the degree and
extent of performance, risks and organizational impacts
of AI-integrated IS throughout the time so as to uncover
appropriate results after making necessary adjustments
to

the

technological

advancement

and

the

circumstances.

The second limitation is related to the distribution of the
available data that is geographically concentrated. Most
of the sources discussed in this paper are empirical and
case studies undertaken in North America, Europe and
some parts of Asia. Consequently, the results might not
already fully mirror the situation in the emerging
economies or in the organizations functioning under
various

regulatory,

infrastructure,

or

cultural

environment. The research gap attracts attention to
how AI-integrated IS operates in low-resource
environments where the lack of information quality,

digital infrastructure, and professional skills can play a
pivotal role in the implementation. All future research
needs to extend its geographic focus and give higher
emphasis to region-specific studies, especially those
belonging to the Global South to make the resulting
insights as inclusive as possible in order to improve
equitable digital transformation.

Also, although this work has paid significant attention to
the performance and governance perspectives of AI-
integrated IS, it has not done so extensively to really
identify the psychology and behavior forms of end-
users. The more an AI system is assigned decision-
making powers, the more of a problem user trust,
system transparency, and a perceived fairness are. The
fear of losing a job and the lack of interpretability or the
perceived bias as the roots of resistance to the process
of AI adoption may disrupt the desired effects of the
integration. Although other literature in the field has
mentioned those human factors but just in brief, a
future study has to take an interdisciplinary approach
including behavioral science, organizational psychology,
and human-computer interaction in investigating how
users can interact, oppose, or adapt to AI in IS
paradigms.

The aspects of governance and ethics outlined in this
paper are also undeveloped as far as their practical
application is concerned. The study provides guidelines
on the new standards, like GDPR, EU AI Act or XAI
frameworks, but it fails to present an overall roadmap
how organizations can actually implement them in
various IS situations. As an example, explainable and
performant complex neural networks are an unsolved
technical problem. On the same note, the idea of
integrating adversarial robustness, bias mitigation, and
privacy-preserving tactics on live systems needs further
discussion. Further studies need to aim at establishing
useful action models of governance, audit instruments
of ethics and business-specific frameworks turning
theoretical highs into practical lows.

Moreover, environmental sustainability of AI in IS,
though was discussed in this paper, can be expanded.
The power demands of training and using large AI
models are a burning issue as organizations aim at
meeting the international climate targets and ESG
promises. Along with the advent of green AI projects,
very little empirical evidence is present regarding the
overall impact or cost-benefit-tradeoffs of these
projects. There should be more studies to assess the

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

169

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

environmental lifecycle consequences of the AI-
integrated IS and to develop frameworks that would
maximise

performance

and

sustainability

simultaneously.

Last but not least, the macroeconomic and social effect
of massive integration of AI-IS is also under-researched.
Although the paper has discussed the effects of AI at the
organizational level, it has not comprehensively
answered the questions in regard to labor market
disruption, digital inequality and professional reshaping
questions. The revolution that is brought by AI on IS
poses important questions of who gains, who loses and
how value is reallocated among stakeholders. The next
step of the research should be to go beyond the
organizational limits and look at the impacts of AI-
augmented IS on the society, economies, and
governance of the institutions.

To sum up, although this research is detailed and covers
all opportunities and challenges that the integration of
AI into Information Systems brings, it is influenced by
the limitations which the following research must
consider tactfully. These are methodological limitation
associated with first hand data gathering, disparity in
standard measures, tech unpredictability, region
imbalance, psychological relationship vulneration,
harnessing

of

government operations,

natural

environment minimization, and social impact in general.
By providing efforts to overcome such limitations by
adopting interdisciplinary, longitudinal, and context-
sensitive research, we will not only be able to become
more accurate in our understanding of AI in IS, but also
lead to responsible innovation that is long-term
sustainable, inclusive, and ethical.

10.

Conclusion And Recommendations

One of the most radical phenomena that the modern
age of the digital sector offers is the implementation of
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Information Systems (IS). As
evidenced by this paper, AI is by no means an auxiliary
tool that is grafted onto existing systems-it is a
fundamental technology that shifts the architecture,
functionality and strategic value of IS around the
industries. Predictive analytics and autonomous
operations, personalized customer contact and real-
time decision-making are just a few of the ways in which
AI-driven IS can allow organizations to intuit the
shortcomings of traditional models of computing and
enable a new realm of speed, efficiency and flexibility.
But such transformation itself is not linear and safe. The

benefits are high and evident; however, they can be
offset by urgent issues touching on ethical governance,
technical complexity, social equity, and environmental
sustainability. Technological innovation has helped the
AI-augmented IS advance over the years but it is only
through the foresight, responsibility, and the ability to
adapt to the change brought about by AI-augmented IS
that it can further guarantee its future success.

The evidence presented in the various findings of this
study supports the fact that AI contributes greatly to the
performance of the business in most of its functional
areas. In the manufacturing industry, there has been a
less downtime and better effort reliability with the use
of predictive maintenance systems and defect
detectors. In banking, Artificial intelligence has
improved fraud detection and credit scoring in terms of
accuracy and efficiency. Scheduling of patients, AI-
driven diagnostics in healthcare have enhanced
resources utilization, clinical outcomes. Personalization,
that is used in retailing and logistics, has been increased
with the help of AI and so customer satisfaction and
revenue increase directly. Such results highlight huge
potential of AI in streamlining processes, saving money,
and offering strategic insight, which is the central aim of
any information system.

In addition, the architectural evolution of IS amid the
impact of AI provided new paradigms of designing
intertwined

with

modularity,

scalability,

and

adaptability. Diffusion of microservices as well as cloud-
native platforms, edge computing, as well as cognitive
interfaces, is an indelible part of contemporary IS.
Architectural decisions allow organizations to innovate
at speed, and deal with real-time changes and a level of
flexibility that could never be accommodated in legacy
systems. AI can also improve IS through self-learning and
self-improvement of the systems so that they can
accommodate changing sets of data and environmental
conditions. Through that, AI transforms IS into smart
systems, which expect, discern, and act by themselves
using intelligence to take action.

Nevertheless, such development is also accompanied by
a variety of multidimensional problems that shall be
resolved in a proactive manner. Among the most salient
requirements, one should note decision opacity in AI
systems. The transparency is eroded by the so-called
nature of the complex algorithms which are considered
as a black box, especially where accountability and
fairness are critical. In the term of healthcare diagnosis,

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

170

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

employment or financial authorization, stakeholders
should have the opportunity to comprehend, audit, and
challenge the decision made by the AI. In the absence of
explainability, trust in AI-integrated IS will be like waves,
particularly, end-users and regulatory agencies. That is
why the use of Explainable AI (XAI) methods cannot be a
matter of choice.

There is another essential issue: algorithmic bias. The
use of biased data to train AI models may continue and
even increase existing societal disparities as referenced
in the various case studies presented in this paper. All
throughout the AI lifecycle, including data collection and
preprocessing, model selection, and deployment,
fairness has to be coded. Supporting ethical AI
governance

enabled

through

clear

lines

of

accountability is required to make sure that IS facilitate
inclusive, equitable outcomes instead of perpetuating
the existing historical inequalities. To strengthen
fairness auditing, organizations need to implement it
using tools, and interdisciplinary AI ethics committees
should be formed to determine and check the
performance.

There is also an increased concern of security and
privacy. AI systems, especially those that are used in
real-time, are easily attacked by adversaries and are
prone to data breafers. Furthermore, the developments
of huge quantities of personal and behavioral data to be
used to train AI models pose serious dangers concerning
consent, surveillance and misuse. Companies need to
apply privacy-enabling methods like federated learning,
differentially-private learning, and match their data-
processing activities to local and international laws,
including GDPR and CCPA. The way in which security is
achieved should not be considered as something
associated with compliance but rather an essential
feature of AI-based AI.

Sustainability in the environment is becoming an
important area of a responsible AI-IS integration.
Training small and large AI models require a lot of energy
posing significant questions about intelligent systems
carbon footprint. The environmental impact of AI
infrastructure will have to be evaluated as the
organizations and governments set their ambitions in
regard to sustainability. Energy-efficient computing,
optimization of models, and carbon-neutral cloud
systems have to be invested in. The concentration of the
AI integration towards environmental, social, and
governance (ESG) standards will turn into a factor of

sustainability and social recognition.

In addition to technical and moral issues, the
organizational readiness is the basic determinant of AI
success in IS. A lot of organizations do not have the data
maturity, infrastructure, or talent to successfully
operationalize AI. Also, implementation may be stunted
by cultural resistance among the workers or employees,
especially when they are fearful of losing their job due
to increased automation. To secure the buy-in among
the work force, change management techniques,
sustained upskilling initiatives, as well as open
communication are needed. Organizations which treat
AI as a supportive rather than a disruptive entity record
increased chances of success in integrating AI into their
primary IS and processes.

Considering these findings, it is possible to suggest a few
important recommendations. To start, companies ought
to move towards an AI strategic roadmap, even though
it fits into the digitization plans of these organizations.
This roadmap should touch on infrastructure
preparedness, data governance, skill building, as well as
regulatory compliance. Second, the straining should be
made a universal norm rather than a reactionary move
by investing in ethical and safe design. The integration
of XAI, fairness testings, and privacy safeguards into
system life cycles will make them sustainable in terms of
trust and compliance. Third, companies have to
institutionalize lifelong learning both in the system, by
retraining the AI models, as well as at the human level,
by updating the workforce and training the leadership.
Fourth, knowledge sharing, standardization, and
development of responsible innovation ecosystems
come along with collaborations on cross-sector levels
academic, industry, and governmental.

A fundamental role also needs to be played by the policy
makers. Regulation should be in pace with the
innovation without strangulating it. This entails active
and responsive regulatory systems with principles-
based premises that can be modified to incorporate
technological advancements that occur at a fast pace.
An increase in international standards and coordinated
compliance mechanisms and data governance
partnerships across borders will also be necessary in
helping to induce responsible scaling of the use of AI-IS
integration. As well, public investment in research and
development must focus on open-source, interpretable,
energy-efficient AIs to make them more democratic and
less addicted to proprietary models.

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

171

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The study presents some urgent future research
directions to researchers. These incorporate the
longitudinal study incorporating the effects of AI on
organizational structures and labor markets, empirical
estimation of the effectiveness of XAI in live systems,
comparative analysis of the performances of creatively
dealt with AI in resource-limited contexts, and the
appraisal of the impact of IS) blueshift-powered AI to a
scale of the society. The challenges in the next
generation of smart accountable information systems
will depend on interdisciplinary research to blend the
technical, ethical, economic, and sociological realms.

To sum up, integration of AI into Information Systems is
very promising, yet along with that promise come global
responsibilities. Companies which strategically minded,
with an ethical mind, and resilient organizational
operations will be well-placed to fully utilise AI. We can
get to a place where IS with transparency, inclusivity,
and sustainability put at the center can create business
value and, at the same time, support overall public
interest in the era of the algorithm fueled decision-
making.

11.

References

1.

Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A. The business of artificial
intelligence. Harv Bus Rev. 2017;95(1):1-40.

2.

Davenport TH. The AI advantage: how to put the
artificial intelligence revolution to work. Cambridge:
MIT Press; 2018.

3.

McKinsey Global Institute. Notes from the AI
frontier: modeling the impact of AI on the world
economy. New York: McKinsey & Company; 2018
Sep.

4.

Lee J, Davari H, Singh J, Pandhare V. Industrial AI:
applications for sustainable manufacturing. IEEE
Trans Ind Inform. 2020;16(1):331-340.

5.

Deloitte Insights. AI and fraud detection: a game
changer for financial institutions. 2021 Mar.

6.

Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-
level classification of skin cancer with deep neural
networks. Nature. 2017;542(7639):115-118.

7.

Wamba SF, Gunasekaran A, Akter S, Ren SJ. Big data
analytics and firm performance: effects of dynamic
capabilities. J Bus Res. 2017;70:356-365.

8.

Mehrabi N, Morstatter F, Saxena N, Lerman K,
Galstyan A. A survey on bias and fairness in machine
learning. ACM Comput Surv. 2021;54(6):1-35.

9.

Reuters Investigates. Amazon scraps secret AI
recruiting tool that showed bias against women.
2018 Oct 10.

10.

Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan
S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to
manage the health of populations. Science.
2019;366(6464):447-453.

11.

Floridi L, Cowls J, Beltrametti M, et al. AI4People - an
ethical framework for a good AI society. Nat Mach
Intell. 2020;2(1):5-7.

12.

High-Level Expert Group on AI. Ethics guidelines for
trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission;
2019 Apr.

13.

Schneier B. AI and the future of cybersecurity. MIT
Technol Rev. 2020 Jan 15.

14.

IBM Security. Cost of a data breach report 2023.
Armonk: IBM; 2023.

15.

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Article
22 - automated individual decision-making. Off J Eur
Union. 2016;L119:1-88.

16.

MIT Sloan Management Review and Boston
Consulting Group. Winning with AI. 2023.

17.

Cowls J, Tsamados A, Taddeo M, Floridi L. The AI
gambit: leveraging artificial intelligence to combat
climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2021;11(1):518-
527.

18.

Frey CB, Osborne MA. The future of employment:
how susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;114:254-280.

19.

Topol E. Deep medicine: how artificial intelligence
can make healthcare human again. New York: Basic
Books; 2019.

20.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Artificial
intelligence/machine

learning

(AI/ML)-based

software as a medical device. 2021 Jan.

21.

Kagermann

H,

Wahlster

W,

Helbig

J. Recommendations for implementing the strategic
initiative Industrie 4.0. Berlin: National Academy of
Science and Engineering; 2013.

22.

Forbes Insights. AI in retail: transforming customer
experience. 2022.

23.

Dellermann D, Calma A, Lipusch N, et al. The future
of human-AI collaboration. MIS Q. 2021;45(3):1431-
1450.

24.

Shi W, Cao J, Zhang Q, Li Y, Xu L. Edge computing:
vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J.
2016;3(5):637-646.

25.

Biamonte J, Wittek P, Pancotti N, et al. Quantum
machine learning. Nature. 2017;549(7671):195-202.

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

172

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

26.

Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern
approach. 4th ed. London: Pearson; 2020.

27.

Arrieta AB, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, et
al. Explainable

AI:

concepts,

taxonomies,

opportunities

and

challenges.

Inf

Fusion.

2020;58:82-115.

28.

Stone P, Brooks R, Brynjolfsson E, et al. Artificial
intelligence and life in 2030. Stanford: One Hundred
Year Study on AI; 2016.

29.

Zhang J, Zheng Y, Qi D. Deep spatio-temporal
residual networks for citywide crowd flows
prediction. AAAI. 2017;31(1).

30.

Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of
AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1(9):389-
399.

31.

Cath C, Wachter S, Mittelstadt B, et al. Artificial
intelligence and the 'good society'. Sci Eng Ethics.
2018;24(2):505-528.

32.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Digital health
software precertification (Pre-Cert) program. 2019.

33.

Zhang BH, Lemoine B, Mitchell M. Mitigating
unwanted biases with adversarial learning.
AAAI/ACM Conf AI Ethics Soc. 2018.

34.

Dwork C, Roth A. The algorithmic foundations of
differential privacy. Found Trends Theor Comput Sci.
2014;9(3-4):211-407.

35.

Alsheibani S, Cheung Y, Messom C. AI adoption. In:
Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International
Conference on System Sciences. 2018.

36.

Benbya H, Davenport TH, Pachidi S. Artificial
intelligence in organizations. MIS Q Exec.
2021;20(1).

37.

Wilson HJ, Daugherty PR, Bianzino N. The jobs that
artificial intelligence will create. MIT Sloan Manag
Rev. 2017;58(4).

38.

Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Artificial intelligence,
automation and work. NBER Working Paper No.
24196. 2018.

39.

Vinuesa R, Azizpour H, Leite I, et al. The role of
artificial intelligence in achieving sustainable
development goals. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):233.

40.

Strubell E, Ganesh A, McCallum A. Energy and policy
considerations for deep learning in NLP. ACL. 2019.

41.

Schwartz R, Dodge J, Smith NA, Etzioni O. Green AI.
Commun ACM. 2020;63(12):54-63.

42.

Google AI. AI for social good. 2022.

43.

Dwivedi YK, Hughes L, Ismagilova E, et al. Artificial
intelligence for decision making. Int J Inf Manage.
2021;57:102304.

44.

Raisch S, Krakowski S. Artificial intelligence and
management. Acad Manage J. 2021;64(1):5-19.

45.

Szegedy C, Zaremba W, Sutskever I, et al. Intriguing
properties of neural networks. ICLR. 2014.

46.

Goodfellow IJ, Shlens J, Szegedy C. Explaining and
harnessing adversarial examples. ICLR. 2015.

47.

Zuboff S. The age of surveillance capitalism. New
York: PublicAffairs; 2019.

48.

Taddeo M, Floridi L. How AI can be a force for good.
Science. 2018;361(6404):751-752.

49.

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning as
Business Tools: A Framework for Diagnosing Value
Destruction

Potential

-

Md

Nadil

Khan, Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md

Risalat

Hossain

Ontor, Nahid Khan, Ashequr Rahman - IJFMR
Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.23680

50.

Enhancing Business Sustainability Through the
Internet of Things - MD Nadil Khan, Zahidur
Rahman, Sufi

Sudruddin

Chowdhury, Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain
Ontor, Md Didear Hossen, Nahid Khan, Hamdadur
Rahman - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-
February

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.24118

51.

Real-Time Environmental Monitoring Using Low-
Cost Sensors in Smart Cities with IoT - MD Nadil
Khan, Zahidur

Rahman, Sufi

Sudruddin

Chowdhury, Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain
Ontor, Md Didear Hossen, Nahid Khan, Hamdadur
Rahman - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-
February

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.23163

52.

IoT and Data Science Integration for Smart City
Solutions - Mohammad Abu Sufian, Shariful
Haque, Khaled Al-Samad, Omar Faruq, Mir Abrar
Hossain, Tughlok Talukder, Azher Uddin Shayed -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1086

53.

Business Management in an Unstable Economy:
Adaptive Strategies and Leadership - Shariful
Haque, Mohammad

Abu

Sufian, Khaled

Al-

Samad, Omar Faruq, Mir Abrar Hossain, Tughlok
Talukder, Azher Uddin Shayed - AIJMR Volume 2,
Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1084

54.

The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications,
Investments, and Challenges for Enterprises - Md
Nadil Khan, Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain
Ontor, Nahid Khan, Ashequr Rahman - IJFMR

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

173

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.22699

55.

Real-Time Health Monitoring with IoT - MD Nadil
Khan, Zahidur Rahman, Sufi Sudruddin Chowdhury,
Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain Ontor, Md
Didear Hossen, Nahid Khan, Hamdadur Rahman -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.22751

56.

Strategic Adaptation to Environmental Volatility:
Evaluating the Long-Term Outcomes of Business
Model Innovation - MD Nadil Khan, Shariful
Haque, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-Samad, A H M
Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid Khan - AIJMR
Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1079

57.

Evaluating the Impact of Business Intelligence Tools
on Outcomes and Efficiency Across Business Sectors
- MD Nadil Khan, Shariful Haque, Kazi Sanwarul
Azim, Khaled Al-Samad, A H M Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar
Faruq, Nahid Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1080

58.

Analyzing the Impact of Data Analytics on
Performance Metrics in SMEs - MD Nadil
Khan, Shariful Haque, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled
Al-Samad, A H M Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid
Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1081

59.

The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence and its Impact
on Economic Paradigms in the USA and Globally -
MD Nadil khan, Shariful Haque, Kazi Sanwarul
Azim, Khaled Al-Samad, A H M Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar
Faruq, Nahid Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1083

60.

Exploring the Impact of FinTech Innovations on the
U.S. and Global Economies - MD Nadil Khan, Shariful
Haque, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-Samad, A H M
Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid Khan - AIJMR
Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1082

61.

Business Innovations in Healthcare: Emerging
Models for Sustainable Growth - MD Nadil
khan, Zakir

Hossain, Sufi

Sudruddin

Chowdhury, Md. Sohel Rana, Abrar Hossain, MD
Habibullah

Faisal, SK

Ayub

Al

Wahid, MD

Nuruzzaman Pranto - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1093

62.

Impact of IoT on Business Decision-Making: A
Predictive Analytics Approach - Zakir Hossain, Sufi
Sudruddin Chowdhury, Md. Sohel Rana, Abrar
Hossain, MD

Habibullah

Faisal, SK

Ayub

Al

Wahid, Mohammad Hasnatul Karim - AIJMR Volume
2,

Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1092

63.

Security Challenges and Business Opportunities in
the

IoT

Ecosystem

-

Sufi

Sudruddin

Chowdhury, Zakir Hossain, Md. Sohel Rana, Abrar
Hossain, MD

Habibullah

Faisal, SK

Ayub

Al

Wahid, Mohammad Hasnatul Karim - AIJMR Volume
2,

Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1089

64.

The Impact of Economic Policy Changes on
International Trade and Relations - Kazi Sanwarul
Azim, A H M Jafor, Mir Abrar Hossain, Azher Uddin
Shayed, Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Obyed Ullah Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1098

65.

Privacy and Security Challenges in IoT Deployments
- Obyed Ullah Khan, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, A H M
Jafor, Azher

Uddin

Shayed, Mir

Abrar

Hossain, Nabila Ahmed Nikita - AIJMR Volume 2,
Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1099

66.

Digital Transformation in Non-Profit Organizations:
Strategies, Challenges, and Successes - Nabila
Ahmed Nikita, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, A H M
Jafor, Azher

Uddin

Shayed, Mir

Abrar

Hossain, Obyed Ullah Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue
5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1097

67.

AI and Machine Learning in International Diplomacy
and Conflict Resolution - Mir Abrar Hossain, Kazi
Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor, Azher Uddin
Shayed, Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Obyed Ullah Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1095

68.

The Evolution of Cloud Computing & 5G
Infrastructure and its Economical Impact in the
Global Telecommunication Industry - A H M
Jafor, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Mir Abrar Hossain, Azher
Uddin Shayed, Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Obyed Ullah
Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1100

69.

Leveraging Blockchain for Transparent and Efficient
Supply Chain Management: Business Implications
and Case Studies - Ankur Sarkar, S A Mohaiminul

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

174

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

Islam, A J M Obaidur Rahman Khan, Tariqul
Islam, Rakesh Paul, Md Shadikul Bari - IJFMR
Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28492

70.

AI-driven Predictive Analytics for Enhancing
Cybersecurity in a Post-pandemic World: a Business
Strategy Approach - S A Mohaiminul Islam, Ankur
Sarkar, A J M Obaidur Rahman Khan, Tariqul
Islam, Rakesh Paul, Md Shadikul Bari - IJFMR
Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28493

71.

The Role of Edge Computing in Driving Real-time
Personalized Marketing: a Data-driven Business
Perspective - Rakesh Paul, S A Mohaiminul
Islam, Ankur Sarkar, A J M Obaidur Rahman
Khan, Tariqul Islam, Md Shadikul Bari - IJFMR
Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28494

72.

Circular Economy Models in Renewable Energy:
Technological Innovations and Business Viability -
Md Shadikul Bari, S A Mohaiminul Islam, Ankur
Sarkar, A J M Obaidur Rahman Khan, Tariqul
Islam, Rakesh Paul - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28495

73.

Artificial Intelligence in Fraud Detection and
Financial Risk Mitigation: Future Directions and
Business Applications - Tariqul Islam, S A
Mohaiminul Islam, Ankur Sarkar, A J M Obaidur
Rahman Khan, Rakesh Paul, Md Shadikul Bari -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28496

74.

The Integration of AI and Machine Learning in
Supply Chain Optimization: Enhancing Efficiency and
Reducing Costs - Syed Kamrul Hasan, MD Ariful
Islam, Ayesha Islam Asha, Shaya afrin Priya, Nishat
Margia Islam - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28075

75.

Cybersecurity in the Age of IoT: Business Strategies
for Managing Emerging Threats - Nishat Margia
Islam, Syed Kamrul Hasan, MD Ariful Islam, Ayesha
Islam Asha, Shaya Afrin Priya - IJFMR Volume 6,
Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28076

76.

The Role of Big Data Analytics in Personalized
Marketing: Enhancing Consumer Engagement and
Business Outcomes - Ayesha Islam Asha, Syed
Kamrul Hasan, MD Ariful Islam, Shaya afrin
Priya, Nishat Margia Islam - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28077

77.

Sustainable Innovation in Renewable Energy:
Business Models and Technological Advances -
Shaya Afrin Priya, Syed Kamrul Hasan, Md Ariful
Islam, Ayesha Islam Asha, Nishat Margia Islam -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28079

78.

The Impact of Quantum Computing on Financial Risk
Management: A Business Perspective - Md Ariful
Islam, Syed Kamrul Hasan, Shaya Afrin Priya, Ayesha
Islam Asha, Nishat Margia Islam - IJFMR Volume 6,
Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28080

79.

AI-driven

Predictive

Analytics,

Healthcare

Outcomes, Cost Reduction, Machine Learning,
Patient Monitoring - Sarowar Hossain, Ahasan
Ahmed, Umesh Khadka, Shifa Sarkar, Nahid Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/ 10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1104

80.

Blockchain in Supply Chain Management: Enhancing
Transparency, Efficiency, and Trust - Nahid
Khan, Sarowar

Hossain, Umesh

Khadka, Shifa

Sarkar - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1105

81.

Cyber-Physical Systems and IoT: Transforming Smart
Cities for Sustainable Development - Umesh
Khadka, Sarowar Hossain, Shifa Sarkar, Nahid Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1106

82.

Quantum Machine Learning for Advanced Data
Processing in Business Analytics: A Path Toward
Next-Generation Solutions - Shifa Sarkar, Umesh
Khadka, Sarowar Hossain, Nahid Khan - AIJMR
Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1107

83.

Optimizing Business Operations through Edge
Computing: Advancements in Real-Time Data
Processing for the Big Data Era - Nahid
Khan, Sarowar

Hossain, Umesh

Khadka, Shifa

Sarkar - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1108

84.

Data Science Techniques for Predictive Analytics in
Financial Services - Shariful Haque, Mohammad Abu
Sufian, Khaled Al-Samad, Omar Faruq, Mir Abrar
Hossain, Tughlok Talukder, Azher Uddin Shayed -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1085

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

175

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

85.

Leveraging IoT for Enhanced Supply Chain
Management in Manufacturing - Khaled AlSamad,
Mohammad Abu Sufian, Shariful Haque, Omar
Faruq, Mir Abrar Hossain, Tughlok Talukder, Azher
Uddin Shayed - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1087
33

86.

AI-Driven Strategies for Enhancing Non-Profit
Organizational Impact - Omar Faruq, Shariful Haque,
Mohammad Abu Sufian, Khaled Al-Samad, Mir Abrar
Hossain, Tughlok Talukder, Azher Uddin Shayed -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i0.1088

87.

Sustainable Business Practices for Economic
Instability: A Data-Driven Approach - Azher Uddin
Shayed, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor, Mir Abrar
Hossain, Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Obyed Ullah Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1095

88.

Mohammad Majharul Islam, MD Nadil khan,
Kirtibhai Desai, MD Mahbub Rabbani, Saif Ahmad, &
Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025). AI-Powered Business
Intelligence in IT: Transforming Data into Strategic
Solutions for Enhanced Decision-Making. The
American Journal of Engineering and Technology,
7(02),

59

–

73.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue02-
09.

89.

Saif Ahmad, MD Nadil khan, Kirtibhai Desai,
Mohammad Majharul Islam, MD Mahbub Rabbani,
& Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025). Optimizing IT Service
Delivery with AI: Enhancing Efficiency Through
Predictive Analytics and Intelligent Automation. The
American Journal of Engineering and Technology,
7(02),

44

–

58.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue02-
08.

90.

Esrat Zahan Snigdha, MD Nadil khan, Kirtibhai Desai,
Mohammad Majharul Islam, MD Mahbub Rabbani,
& Saif Ahmad. (2025). AI-Driven Customer Insights
in IT Services: A Framework for Personalization and
Scalable Solutions. The American Journal of
Engineering and Technology, 7(03), 35

–

49.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
04.

91.

MD Mahbub Rabbani, MD Nadil khan, Kirtibhai
Desai, Mohammad Majharul Islam, Saif Ahmad, &
Esrat

Zahan

Snigdha.

(2025).

Human-AI

Collaboration

in

IT

Systems

Design:

A

Comprehensive Framework for Intelligent Co-
Creation. The American Journal of Engineering and
Technology,

7(03),

50

–

68.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
05.

92.

Kirtibhai Desai, MD Nadil khan, Mohammad
Majharul Islam, MD Mahbub Rabbani, Saif Ahmad,
& Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025). Sentiment analysis
with ai for it service enhancement: leveraging user
feedback for adaptive it solutions. The American
Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(03), 69

–

87.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
06.

93.

Mohammad Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Muhammad
Saqib Jalil, MahamSaeed, Abdullah al mamun, Esrat
Zahan Snigdha, MD Nadil khan, NahidKhan, & MD
Mohaiminul Hasan. (2025). Big Data and Machine
Learning inHealthcare: A Business Intelligence
Approach for Cost Optimization andService
Improvement. The American Journal of Medical
Sciences

andPharmaceutical

Research,

115

–

135.https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07Is
sue0314.

94.

Maham Saeed, Muhammad Saqib Jalil, Fares
Mohammed Dahwal, Mohammad Tonmoy
Jubaear Mehedy, Esrat Zahan Snigdha, Abdullah
al mamun, & MD Nadil khan. (2025). The Impact of
AI on Healthcare Workforce Management: Business
Strategies for Talent Optimization and IT
Integration. The American Journal of Medical
Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research, 7(03), 136

–

156.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07Issue0
3-15.

95.

Muhammad Saqib Jalil, Esrat Zahan Snigdha,
Mohammad Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Maham
Saeed, Abdullah al mamun, MD Nadil khan, & Nahid
Khan. (2025). AI-Powered Predictive Analytics in
Healthcare

Business:

Enhancing

OperationalEfficiency and Patient Outcomes. The
American Journal of Medical Sciences and
Pharmaceutical

Research,

93

–

114.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07Issue0
3-13.

96.

Esrat Zahan Snigdha, Muhammad Saqib Jalil, Fares
Mohammed Dahwal, Maham Saeed, Mohammad
Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Abdullah al mamun, MD
Nadil khan, & Syed Kamrul Hasan. (2025).
Cybersecurity in Healthcare IT Systems: Business

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

176

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

Risk Management and Data Privacy Strategies. The
American Journal of Engineering and Technology,
163

–

184.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
15.

97.

Abdullah al mamun, Muhammad Saqib Jalil,
Mohammad Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Maham
Saeed, Esrat Zahan Snigdha, MD Nadil khan, & Nahid
Khan.

(2025).

Optimizing

Revenue

Cycle

Management in Healthcare: AI and IT Solutions for
Business Process Automation. The American Journal
of

Engineering

and

Technology,

141

–

162.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
14.

98.

Hasan, M. M., Mirza, J. B., Paul, R., Hasan, M. R.,
Hassan, A., Khan, M. N., & Islam, M. A. (2025).
Human-AI Collaboration in Software Design: A
Framework for Efficient Co Creation. AIJMR-
Advanced International Journal of Multidisciplinary
Research,

3(1).

DOI:

10.62127/aijmr.2025.v03i01.1125

99.

Mohammad Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Muhammad
Saqib Jalil, Maham Saeed, Esrat Zahan Snigdha,
Nahid Khan, MD Mohaiminul Hasan.The American
Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharmaceutical
Research,

7(3).

115-

135.https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07Is
sue03-14.

100.

Junaid Baig Mirza, MD Mohaiminul Hasan,

Rajesh Paul, Mohammad Rakibul Hasan, Ayesha
Islam Asha. AIJMR-Advanced International Journal
of Multidisciplinary Research, Volume 3, Issue 1,
January-February

2025

.DOI:

10.62127/aijmr.2025.v03i01.1123 .

101.

Mohammad Rakibul Hasan, MD Mohaiminul Hasan,
Junaid Baig Mirza, Ali Hassan, Rajesh Paul, MD Nadil
Khan,

Nabila

Ahmed

Nikita.AIJMR-Advanced

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research,
Volume 3, Issue 1, January-February 2025 .DOI:
10.62127/aijmr.2025.v03i01.1124

.