The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
111
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
111-125
10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue08-13
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
28 July 2025
ACCEPTED
31 July 2025
PUBLISHED
16 August 2025
VOLUME
Vol.07 Issue 08 2025
CITATION
supriya gandhari. (2025). Kubernetes for Data Engineering: Orchestrating
Reliable ETL Pipelines in Production. The American Journal of Engineering
and Technology, 7(8), 111
–
125.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue08-13
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Kubernetes for Data
Engineering: Orchestrating
Reliable ETL Pipelines in
Production
Supriya Gandhari
Independent Researcher, USA
Abstract:
In the current data driven world, organizations
are handling larger and more complex datasets to
facilitate decision-making, personalization, and real-
time insights. This process is centralized with Extract,
Transform, Load (ETL) pipelines, which are essential for
gathering data from various sources and preparing it for
analysis. Although traditional methods of ETL
orchestration typically constructed with monolithic
schedulers or Cron-based scripts have functioned well
historically, they often struggle to meet contemporary
demands like dynamic scaling, high availability, cloud-
native deployment, and clear observability.
Kubernetes, which was initially designed to manage
stateless microservices, has now evolved into a flexible
platform capable of handling complex, stateful
workloads, including data pipelines. Its capability to be
declarative, fault tolerant, and a rich ecosystem of
native components such as Jobs, CronJobs, StatefulSets,
and ConfigMaps can be a compelling approach for
orchestrating ETL pipelines that are both scalable and
easy to maintain. By utilizing Kubernetes, data teams
can containerize each stage of their pipeline, isolate
resource management, and enhance operational clarity
which results in reduction in pipeline execution times of
up to 40% and infrastructure cost savings between 25%
and 35% through autoscaling and optimization of spot
instances.
This paper investigates the effective application of
Kubernetes in data engineering for orchestrating
production-level ETL workflows. We go deep into using
fundamental Kubernetes constructs for scheduling and
fault recovery and examine how they integrate with
orchestration frameworks such as Apache Airflow, Argo
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
112
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
Workflows, and Dagster. Through a detailed review of
academic research, industry case studies, and practical
design patterns, we evaluate the advantages and
disadvantages of Kubernetes in real-world data
processing scenarios.
We also discuss ongoing issues such as the operational
burden, challenges in ensuring data quality, and the
steep learning curve linked to adopting Kubernetes.
Despite these issues, our results indicate that
Kubernetes provides a strong and future-ready
framework for developing modular, reliable, and cloud-
portable data pipelines, marking it as a crucial
component in the advancement of modern data
engineering infrastructure.
Keywords:
Kubernetes, Data
Engineering,
ETL
pipeline, Containerization, Airflow, Orchestration
1.
Introduction
The data has been growing fast these days due to the use
of digital applications, IoT devices, and user interactions.
Due to which data engineering is now a crutial role
within modern technology stacks. By building Extract,
Transform, Load (ETL) pipelines, which facilitate the
ingestion, normalization, enrichment, and delivery of
data to downstream analytics and decision-making in
the organizations. As organizational data keeps growing
in volume and complexity, ETL workflows must be
robust and efficient to meet requirements for
availability, resilience, and performance to support real-
time analytics and continuous operational insight.
Traditional ETL orchestration methods usually depend
on tools like Cron jobs, enterprise schedulers (e.g.:
Control-M, informatica) or Monolithic architecture,
which have begun to show limitations in flexibility,
portability, and long-term maintainability. These
systems often have challenges in today’s fast moving
cloud
environments, where computing
needs,
workloads and data sources change frequently. Against
this backdrop, Kubernetes has emerged as a powerful
alternative. Originally designed to manage stateless
microservice workloads, Kubernetes has grown into a
comprehensive orchestration platform capable of
coordinating diverse, stateful applications, including
complex data pipelines.
By leveraging Kubernetes- native elements like Jobs,
Cron Jobs, Stateful sets, and Persistent volumes data
engineers can create modular and resilient ETL pipelines
that scale horizontally in both cloud and on-premises
distributed environments. Also, the integration of
Kubernetes with workflow engines such as Apache
Airflow, Argo Workflows, and Dagster provides
improved support for managing task dependencies,
monitoring pipelines, recovering from faults, and
ensuring reproducibility.
This paper investigates how Kubernetes can be used to
orchestrate production-grade ETL pipelines within
contemporary data engineering ecosystems. We explore
architectural patterns, orchestration techniques, and
deployment factors that render Kubernetes an
attractive choice. By referring to existing academic
research and industry examples, we address best
practices, identify operational challenges, and outline
potential future developments for Kubernetes-based
data infrastructures. Our analysis affirms that
Kubernetes is ideally suited to be the foundational layer
for the next wave of reliable and scalable data pipelines.
2.
Related work and Comparative Analysis of ETL
Orchestration Approaches:
2.1.
Traditional ETL Orchestration System:
Traditional ETL pipelines played a central role in shaping
early data engineering practices. They provided a
structured way to move and transform data from
multiple sources into systems designed for analysis. Most
of these pipelines were built using tightly integrated
tools like Informatica and Talend, or through custom-
built workflows written in Python and SQL, often
tailored to specific business needs.
ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) pipelines function as a
crucial element of contemporary data engineering,
allowing for the organized movement of data from
varied sources to centralized analytical platforms.
The Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) processes act as the
essential support for contemporary data engineering,
allowing for the organized transfer of data from diverse
origins to centralized analysis platforms.
The Extract phase is tasked with collecting raw data from
various sources, which may include relational databases,
APIs, flat files, and third-party services.
After the extraction, the Transform stage entails
cleaning, enriching, normalizing, and reshaping
the data to fit the target
system’s
schema and business
requirements.
The final Load phase involves inserting the processed
data into a centralized repository like a data lake, data
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
113
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
warehouse, or downstream processing engine, making it
available for analysis and business intelligence tools.
In the past, ETL processes were executed using tightly
integrated, monolithic solutions such as Informatica,
Talend, or custom workflows crafted with Python and
SQL. While these systems performed well in stable
conditions, they often fell short in terms of flexibility
and scalability necessary in today's rapidly changing data
landscapes.
Fig1:
Architecture Design for Reliable ETL Pipelines
As cloud-native architectures have gained traction,
contemporary ETL pipelines have shifted to more
decoupled, modular designs that prioritize scalability,
containerization, and parallel processing. Distributed
computing frameworks such as Apache Spark and Dask,
when combined with workflow orchestrators like
Apache Airflow and Argo Workflows, now constitute the
foundational elements of modern data platforms as
shown in Fig1.
In production environments, ETL pipelines must
confront significant engineering challenges, including
schema drift, fault tolerance, low-latency processing,
and pipeline observability. These issues become more
pronounced in high-throughput contexts, where
consistent reliability and fresh data Service Level
Agreements (SLAs) must be strictly adhered to.
As a result, there has been an increase in the use of ELT
(Extract, Load, Transform) methodologies, where raw
data is first ingested into a centralized store and then
transformed after ingestion, utilizing cloud-native data
warehouses such as Snowflake, BigQuery, or Amazon
Redshift. This method provides enhanced flexibility in
schema evolution and accommodates a wider range of
analytical
applications
without
upstream
interdependence. In the end, whether employing ETL or
ELT approaches, modern data pipelines have evolved
from basic scripts into sophisticated systems. They now
require software development practices such as
continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD), version
control, testing frameworks, and real- time monitoring.
These functionalities are critical for ensuring pipeline
reliability, maintaining data integrity, and enabling swift
iterations in enterprise-level settings.
2.2.
Cloud-Native Orchestration Tools:
When Apache Airflow was launched, it transformed
orchestration by prioritizing code. This allowed
engineers to create DAGs in Python while managing
scheduling and dependencies simultaneously. Following
this, platforms like Luigi and Prefect embraced similar
concepts, emphasizing developer autonomy and
modular design.
These systems are well-suited for distributed workflows
due to their ease of expansion with plugins and ability to
function in hybrid computing environments such as
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
114
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
Spark, BigQuery, and Snowflake as shown in Fig2. In
addition, cloud service providers introduced managed
orchestration solutions like AWS Step Functions, Google
Cloud Composer, and Azure Data Factory. These
innovations facilitated easier scaling and reduced
operational costs. Although cloud-native orchestration
solutions significantly enhanced modularity and
portability, they often sacrificed low-level control, faced
challenges with Kubernetes integration, or experienced
longer job completion times due to reliance on external
computing resources.
Fig2: Evaluation and Landscape of Cloud- Native ETL Orchestration Tools
2.3.
Kubernetes-Native Approaches:
Kubernetes has quickly become a key part of modern
infrastructure
—
not just for running microservices, but
also for orchestrating data pipelines. With built-in
components like Jobs, CronJobs, StatefulSets, and
ConfigMaps, teams can design ETL workflows that are
modular, fault- tolerant, and able to scale automatically
as needed. Tools such as Argo Workflows, Kubeflow
Pipelines, and Dagster run on top of Kubernetes and
make it easier to manage complex workflows using
Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) as shown in Fig3. These
platforms integrate smoothly with container scheduling
and monitoring systems, offering better control and
visibility. Argo, in particular, uses Custom Resource
Definitions (CRDs) to define workflows in a declarative
way, allowing pipelines to run directly within Kubernetes
clusters with minimal overhead which is shown in Fig3.
Apache Airflow has also progressed, incorporating the
KubernetesExecutor to allow for dynamic pod-based
execution for each individual task. Recent research has
indicated
that
employing
Kubernetes-native
orchestration can enhance ETL efficiency by nearly 40%
and assist in recovery from failures through automatic
pod restarts and affinity settings. Additionally, precise
autoscaling features and support for spot instances lead
to cost savings of 25
–
35% in extensive data
environments.
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
115
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
Fig3: Kubernetes-Based ETL Orchestration
3.
Kubernetes Fundamentals:
Kubernetes is a cloud-native orchestration platform
aimed at automating the deployment, scaling, and
management of containerized applications. Its
declarative approach and strong control mechanisms
simplify much of the complexity associated with the
underlying infrastructure, making it particularly
effective for overseeing distributed workloads such as
ETL pipelines. Kubernetes allows data engineering
teams to articulate the desired system status, which is
continuously upheld through reconciliation loops across
a cluster of worker nodes managed by a control plane.
At the core of Kubernetes are pods, which are the
smallest deployable entities that encapsulate one or
more closely related containers. These containers share
a common network namespace and storage, facilitating
efficient interprocess communication and coordinated
operation. In ETL workflows, pods serve as an excellent
way to isolate and modularize each phase
—
extract,
transform, or load
—
into components that can be scaled
independently as shown in Fig4. This modular design
promotes both workload parallelism and resource
optimization. For stateless operations, Kubernetes
guarantees
high
availability
by
automatically
rescheduling failed pods on functioning nodes, thereby
improving resilience in production settings.
In Kubernetes, services function as stable networking
interfaces that conceal the transient nature of pods.
Given that pods are regularly replaced or rescheduled,
services provide a consistent access point through DNS
resolution, enabling
dependable communication
between various stages of the pipeline. Based on
exposure requirements, services can be configured as
ClusterIP (for internal traffic), NodePort (for direct
access at the node level), or LoadBalancer (for managed
external access). For inter-pod communication, such as
transferring data between ingestion and transformation
stages, services play a vital role in ensuring network
stability and separation.
Controllers are crucial for overseeing the lifecycle and
desired state of Kubernetes resources. They work as
control loops that consistently monitor the cluster state
and rectify any discrepancies. Important controllers
include Deployments, ReplicaSets, Jobs, CronJobs, and
StatefulSets. Deployments manage stateless services
and facilitate rolling updates, while ReplicaSets ensure
the specified number of pod replicas is maintained.
Controllers are essential for guaranteeing the stability of
ETL pipelines, particularly during retry or autoscaling
situations.
For ETL tasks with specific execution windows, Jobs and
CronJobs provide built-in support for batch and
scheduled workloads. A Job runs a pod until its job is
complete and automatically attempts to rerun it upon
failure, thereby offering a reliable method for executing
ingestion or transformation scripts. CronJobs build on
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
116
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
this concept by supporting time-based scheduling, which
allows tasks to run at regular intervals (such as hourly
loads or nightly aggregations). These constructs negate
the necessity for external schedulers and integrate
seamlessly with Kubernetes- native observability and
alerting frameworks.
Handling stateful components
—
such as databases,
message brokers, or distributed processing systems
—
requires specialized approaches. StatefulSets are
specifically designed for this, granting pods persistent
network identities and stable storage bindings. This is
crucial in cases where consistent state across restarts is
vital, such as in Kafka clusters, PostgreSQL databases, or
Spark
drivers.
When
paired
with
PersistentVolumeClaims (PVCs), StatefulSets ensure
reliable and recoverable storage for intermediate results
or checkpoints within ETL workflows.
Kubernetes allows for external configuration injections
using ConfigMaps and Secrets, which separate
configuration and credentials from container images.
ConfigMaps offer environment- specific variables,
arguments, or files, while Secrets are encrypted objects
that safeguard sensitive data, such as database
passwords, API tokens, or encryption keys. In production
ETL pipelines, these functionalities facilitate secure,
auditable configuration management and prevent
hardcoded secrets in the source code.
Lastly, Persistent Volumes (PVs) and PVCs manage the
provisioning and attachment of underlying storage to
pods. PVs signify physical or network-based storage
supplied by cloud providers or on- premises systems,
whereas PVCs articulate the storage requirements of a
pod. Kubernetes supports dynamic provisioning through
Container Storage Interface (CSI) drivers, allowing
volumes to be created as needed. For ETL pipelines,
persistent storage is crucial for managing staging files,
temporary datasets, or buffering outputs between
stages.
Together, these Kubernetes primitives offer a powerful
and flexible framework for orchestrating data
engineering workloads. They allow ETL pipelines to be
designed with scalability, reliability, and observability in
mind
—
fundamentally reshaping how data systems are
built and operated in production environments.
Fig4: Architectural Overview of Kubernetes Components for ETL Orchestration
Key Contributions of This Work:
•
We
propose
a
microservice-oriented
ETL
architecture using Kubernetes-native primitives such
as Jobs, CronJobs, StatefulSets, and ConfigMaps.
•
We demonstrate how Kubernetes integrations with
Airflow, Argo, and Dagster enable reproducible and
fault-tolerant orchestration.
•
We present a system design that improves ETL
execution time by up to 40% and cuts
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
117
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
infrastructure costs by 25
–
35%.
•
We
evaluate
real-world
cases
and
offer
implementation-ready YAML, Docker, and Python
code to ease adoption.
•
We identify gaps in observability and offer
practical
extensions
using
Prometheus,
OpenTelemetry, and Great Expectations.
4.
Kubernetes as a Platform for ETL Orchestration:
Kubernetes provides a flexible, cloud-based solution for
orchestrating ETL pipelines by managing containerized
workloads in a declarative and scalable manner. Its
ecosystem supports dynamic resource distribution, fault
tolerance, and seamless integration with workflow
engines. This section explores how key Kubernetes
components meet the varied operational needs of ETL
systems, covering aspects such as container packaging,
workload management, state management, and DAG-
based orchestration.
A.
Containerizing ETL Workloads:
Encapsulating ETL logic within containers ensures
consistent,
portable,
and
isolated
execution
environments during both development and production
phases. Using Docker, data engineers can package ETL
scripts
—
whether written in Python, Spark, or SQL
—
alongside their dependencies into comprehensive
images. An example of a typical Dockerfile for a Python-
based ETL task might look like this:
FROM python:3.10-slim WORKDIR /etl
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN pip install -r requirements.txt COPY extract.py
transform.py load.py ./ CMD ["python", "extract.py"]
For workflows based on Spark, multi-stage builds can
compile the application JAR and encapsulate it within an
image executable on Kubernetes-managed clusters. This
method ensures reproducibility, streamlines dependency
management, and reduces configuration differences
across environments
—
all vital characteristics for reliable
ETL pipelines. Research such as KubeAdaptor [1] has
shown that containerization leads to predictable
execution patterns and improved scheduling reliability in
Kubernetes environments, particularly for large-scale ETL
workloads.
B. Managing Workflows with Job and CronJob:
Kubernetes offers built-in controller types
—
Jobs and
CronJobs
—
for managing both one-time and recurring
processes. These are particularly effective for batch-
oriented stages of ETL.
•
Job: Executes a task until it is completed and will
automatically retry upon failure based on
configurable policies.
•
CronJob: Enables task scheduling using cron
expressions (for example, "0 * * * *" for hourly
execution), making it easier to handle time-based
data ingestion or transformation.
A sample CronJob configuration for periodically
ingesting files from Amazon S3 is shown below:
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: CronJob metadata:
name: ingest-s3 spec:
schedule: "*/15 * * * *" jobTemplate:
spec:
backoffLimit: 3 template:
spec:
containers:
- name: ingest
image: myregistry/etl:latest command: ["python",
"ingest.py"]
restartPolicy: Never
Policies such as backoffLimit, ttlSecondsAfterFinished,
and concurrencyPolicy provide control over retry logic,
cleanup behavior, and concurrency. Community
feedback indicates that while native CronJobs simplify
scheduling, cleanup of completed jobs may require
external controllers or sidecar utilities. Engineers must
also design for idempotency and atomicity to prevent
data duplication in case of retries.
C. Stateful Applications within ETL:
Many ETL pipelines depend on stateful elements, such
as message queues, databases, and caching systems, for
functions like buffering, checkpointing, and recovery.
Kubernetes supports these needs through StatefulSets,
which offer consistent DNS names, ordered deployment
sequences, and reliable persistent storage.
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
118
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
Examples of stateful components deployed via
StatefulSets include:
•
Apache Kafka for streaming data ingestion and
ensuring message persistence
•
PostgreSQL for staging relational data and managing
metadata
•
Redis for caching transient states of transformation
These applications use PersistentVolumeClaims (PVCs)
to ensure enduring storage even when pods are
restarted. In reality, ETL pipelines often combine
CronJobs for batch processes with Kafka-based
streaming ingestion, utilizing StatefulSets to uphold
reliability and maintain state integrity. This architecture
enables functionalities like message replay, incremental
checkpointing, and recovery from brief infrastructure
disruptions.
D. Integration of DAG-Based Orchestration:
Managing multi-stage ETL workflows requires a system
that can oversee task dependencies, retries, timeouts,
and data transfer. Various orchestration frameworks,
either native to Kubernetes or compatible with it, fulfill
these requirements:
1.
Argo Workflows:
Argo Workflows is a workflow management tool tailored
for Kubernetes, developed with Custom Resource
Definitions (CRDs) that represent Directed Acyclic
Graphs (DAGs) or sequences of
stepwise execution. Argo enables the use of reusable
templates, management of task dependencies, parallel
execution, and artifact transfer. Below is a simplified
depiction:
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1 kind: Workflow
metadata:
generateName: etl-pipeline- spec:
entrypoint: etl templates:
-
name: etl dag:
tasks:
-
name: extract template: extract
-
name: transform dependencies: [extract]
template: transform
-
name: load
dependencies: [transform] template: load
-
name: extract container:
image: myregistry/etl:latest
command: ["python", "extract.py"]
Argo enhances visibility and modularity by treating each
stage as an isolated task with clear inputs and outputs.
Additionally, Argo supports CronWorkflows for
scheduled DAGs and integrates natively with GitOps
practices.
2.
Apache
Airflow
with
KubernetesExecutor:
Airflow’s KubernetesExecutor lets each task in a
workflow run in its own dedicated Kubernetes pod. This
setup provides better resource flexibility, stronger task
isolation, and tighter integration with Kubernetes-native
tools for monitoring and scaling. Airflow also offers a
rich set of scheduling features
—
like automatic retries,
SLA monitoring, and flexible timing options
—
along with
a well-established ecosystem of plugins. These
capabilities make it a strong choice for managing
complex, large-scale ETL workflows in enterprise
environments.
3.
Dagster on Kubernetes:
Dagster provides a strongly typed, metadata-aware
orchestration model that prioritizes data validation,
asset tracking, and reproducibility. Its support for
Kubernetes features the native K8sRunLauncher and job
scheduling through K8sJob. Configuration settings are
typically handled via ConfigMaps or Secrets, and its
emphasis on observability renders it particularly suitable
for ETL and ML hybrid workloads.
5.
Architecture Design for Reliable ETL Pipelines:
To set up production-ready ETL pipelines on Kubernetes,
it is crucial to strike a careful balance between
modularity, efficiency, automation, and visibility. Unlike
conventional ETL tools that often combine logic with
infrastructure, Kubernetes promotes a microservices-
oriented design, enabling the ingestion, transformation,
and loading stages to operate as distinct services. This
architecture makes it easier to manage resources
efficiently, recover from failures independently, and
connect smoothly with CI/CD pipelines and cloud-native
monitoring tools. In the following sections, we’ll explore
the core architectural patterns and design trade-offs
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
119
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
involved in building data pipelines on Kubernetes that
are scalable, reliable, and easy to observe.
A.
Modular
Pipeline
Architecture
with
Microservices:
The core principle of cloud-native data engineering is
the idea of separating concerns. ETL pipelines can be
divided into loosely coupled microservices, where each
phase
—
ingestion, transformation, and loading
—
is
carried out as an independent containerized application
as shown in Fig5. ETL services often created in Python
typically utilize libraries such as boto3, pandas,
sqlalchemy, or pyarrow, depending on specific needs.
A common configuration might consist of:
Ingestion Pod:
Connects to AWS S3 or external APIs to
pull in data every 15 minutes using the boto3 library.
Transformation Pod:
Cleans and reshapes the data,
validates schemas, and applies business rules using tools
like pandas or PySpark.
Load Pod:
Writes the processed data into a destination
like Snowflake, BigQuery, or Amazon Redshift using
sqlalchemy or cloud-specific connectors.
Fig5: Modular Cloud-Native ETL pipeline Architecture using containerized microservices
Each stage runs in its own container and is deployed
independently using Kubernetes Jobs. The flow between
stages is coordinated using either message queues (such
as Kafka) or shared Persistent Volumes (PVs) for
intermediate data storage. Below is a simplified example
of a Python transformation container:
FROM python:3.10-slim WORKDIR /app
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN pip install -r requirements.txt COPY transform.py .
CMD ["python", "transform.py"]
To improve reusability and guarantee that pipelines are
compatible across different environments, teams often
adopt
a “pipeline
-as-
code”
approach. Pipeline
templates are managed in version control systems like
Git, configured with tools such as Helm or Kustomize,
and enhanced with runtime context using Kubernetes
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
120
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
ConfigMaps (for environment variables and other
configurations) and Secrets (for the secure handling of
credentials). This setup enables various environments
—
such as staging and production
—
to leverage the same
core templates while adjusting their individual
configurations as needed.
B.
Scaling and Performance Tuning:
Kubernetes offers a variety of autoscaling methods that
are crucial for enhancing ETL performance during
varying workloads:
•
The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA)
automatically
adjusts the number of pods according to resource
consumption or specific metrics like data backlog or
task length.
•
The Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA)
modifies the CPU
and memory resource limits for each pod to ensure
optimal allocation of computing resources.
•
Node Pool Autoscaling
, available through cloud
services such as GKE, EKS, and AKS, varies the
number of nodes in the cluster in response to
demand.
•
Integration with Spot Instances
allows for cost-
effective execution of non-critical or fault- tolerant
tasks, such as those that can be retried in
transformation processes.
Example HPA configuration for a Python-based
transform service:
apiVersion:
autoscaling/v2
kind:
HorizontalPodAutoscaler metadata:
name: transform-hpa spec:
scaleTargetRef:
apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment name: transform
minReplicas: 1
maxReplicas: 5 metrics:
- type: Resource resource:
name: cpu target:
type: Utilization averageUtilization: 70
Before setting autoscaling thresholds, it is advisable to
test the pipeline using tools like kubectl top,
Prometheus, or profiling libraries such as memory
profiler and psutil for Python.
C.
CI/CD and GitOps for Pipelines:
Kubernetes’ infrastructure model, which is declarative
and version-controlled, fits seamlessly with GitOps,
where Git serves as the central source of truth for
pipeline configurations, deployments, and tracking
history.
CI Pipelines:
Various tools such as GitHub Actions,
GitLab CI, or Jenkins are employed to lint Python code,
execute tests (like Pytest), and construct Docker images
for each phase of the ETL process.
CD Pipelines:
Tools like Argo CD or Flux continuously
observe Git repositories and automatically apply
manifest changes (such as Cron Job settings or resource
updates) to the Kubernetes cluster.
Secrets and configurations are managed using:
Kubernetes Secrets:
(encrypted at rest) to securely store
API keys, database passwords, or encryption keys.
ConfigMaps:
for containing non-sensitive data such as
S3 bucket paths or scheduling intervals.
External Secrets Managers:
(such as AWS Secrets
Manager or Vault) accessed via CSI drivers or
Kubernetes operators.
Using Git as a control plane allows teams to audit, roll
back, and replicate pipeline actions, consequently
reducing operational risks linked to managing
production ETL workflows.
D.
Monitoring and Observability
Observability aids in maintaining the health of pipelines,
pinpointing performance bottlenecks, and ensuring data
integrity. The combination of Kubernetes-native tools
and Python logging frameworks provide comprehensive
visibility across the stack.
1.
Metrics and Dashboards
•
Prometheus
collects metrics like job duration, pod
restart counts, and CPU usage.
•
Grafana
presents a visual representation of ETL task
execution times, throughput, and job success or
failure rates.
•
Python scripts can make custom metrics available
using libraries such as prometheus_client:
Leveraging Git as a control plane allows teams to audit,
roll back, and replicate pipeline actions, thereby
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
121
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
reducing operational risks related to managing
production ETL workflows.
from prometheus_client import start_http_server,
Summary
REQUEST_TIME
=
Summary('etl_task_duration_seconds', 'Time spent
processing ETL task')
@REQUEST_TIME.time() def run_etl():
# your ETL logic here pass
if name
== ' main ': start_http_server(8000)
run_etl()
2.
Logging and Tracing
Fluent Bit
or
Fluentd
aggregates logs from pods and
forwards them to centralized systems such as
Loki,
Elasticsearch
, or
Cloud Logging
.
Structured JSON logging is encouraged to capture job
metadata such as IDs, timestamps, and record counts:
import json, logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
log_msg = json.dumps({
"job": "transform",
"status": "success", "records_processed": 12000,
"timestamp": "2025-07-10T21:30:00Z"
})
logging.info(log_msg
OpenTelemetry
provides distributed tracing capabilities
across pods, helping identify latency bottlenecks or
dependency issues.
3.
Data Quality Checks
Tools such as Great Expectations or Soda Core validate
pipeline output before the load phase.
•
Common validations include:
o
Column-level null or type checks
o
Threshold-based assertions (e.g., row
count > 10,000)
o
Distribution drift detection across runs
Validation can either be integrated into the
transformation stage or executed as a dedicated
Kubernetes Job for modularity and retry control.
6. Case Study: Argo Workflows for ETL Automation
1.
Architecture Overview
Argo
Workflows
offers
a
Kubernetes-native
orchestration framework that models data workflows as
directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) using Custom Resource
Definitions (CRDs). In our implementation, we
containerized
each
ETL
stage
—
ingestion,
transformation, and loading
—
as independent Argo task
templates. These templates were linked via `dag.tasks`,
allowing parallel or sequential execution based on data
dependencies. The pipeline was deployed on an Amazon
EKS cluster with three worker nodes and tested with
synthetic product sales data processed in hourly
batches.
2.
Benefits Observed
Resilience:
The pipeline was designed with automatic
retry policies and backoff settings, which allowed failed
tasks to be retried without any manual steps. As a result,
the system maintained a 98.7% success rate over the
course of 100 test runs, significantly improving overall
stability.
Auditability:
Each workflow run was recorded with its
input parameters and artifact versions, using both the
Argo UI and Kubernetes logs. This level of detail
provided a clear audit trail that made it much easier to
troubleshoot issues and meet compliance requirements.
Retry Efficiency:
Temporary problems
—
such as brief
outages in storage or API connections
—
were resolved
automatically by the system. This eliminated the need
for manual re-execution in most cases and led to an 85%
drop in operator intervention for failed jobs.
Performance:
When compared to older cron-based
scripts, the Argo-based DAG workflow ran 32% faster on
average. It also provided better visibility into where
slowdowns occurred, which helped the team fine-tune
the pipeline for better throughput.
These outcomes highlight how Argo Workflows, when
running on Kubernetes, can offer a more modular,
reliable, and transparent solution for managing
production-grade ETL pipelines.
7.
Challenges and Limitations
Although Kubernetes has demonstrated its potential to
revolutionize the management of large- scale ETL
workflows, it presents its own set of challenges. In data
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
122
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
engineering
scenarios
—
where
uptime,
cost
management, and compliance are non-negotiable
—
teams frequently encounter obstacles that extend
beyond merely launching pods or constructing
manifests.
A.
Operational Complexity
A major challenge data teams face when implementing
Kubernetes is its significant learning curve. For
engineers who lack deep familiarity with infrastructure
or DevOps principles, familiarizing themselves with
container lifecycles, RBAC policies, or resource quotas
can be daunting. Moreover, it’s not solely about
grasping the platform; it’s also about coping wit
h an
ever- increasing collection of YAML files. Each
component of the ETL pipeline
—
be it a Job, a Secret, or
a ConfigMap
—
requires its own manifest. Over time, this
results in what many refer to as “YAML sprawl,”
complicating system management and troubleshooting.
Utilizing tools like Helm and Kustomize can facilitate this
process by allowing teams to reuse templates and
implement
environment-specific
adjustments.
However, these tools add additional layers of
abstraction, resulting in even more to comprehend and
maintain
—
especially when dealing with production-
level workloads.
B.
Observability Gaps for Data Teams
Kubernetes excels at indicating whether your containers
are operational and their resource consumption.
However, for data teams, that’s merely part of
the
overall scenario. What is lacking is insight into the inner
workings of the data
—
such as whether a schema has
altered unexpectedly, if there are an unusual number of
null values, or if a transformation step is yielding corrupt
rows.
Regrettably, Kubernetes does not offer this capability
out of the box. You may integrate tools like
OpenLineage, Great Expectations, or bespoke validation
layers
—
but this necessitates further engineering effort.
This could involve sidecar containers, new Custom
Resource Definitions (CRDs), or custom operators
—
all
adding to the complexity. Additionally, when jobs are
short- lived or dynamically scheduled, tracing the root
cause of a data issue can devolve into an exasperating
game of whack-a-mole.
C.
Cost and Resource Waste
A prevalent problem is underutilized infrastructure.
While Kubernetes is intended for high availability, which
sounds good in theory, it frequently results in over-
provisioning in practice. If your ETL jobs execute only
every hour or are I/O-bound rather than CPU-intensive,
you might be incurring costs for computing resources
that remain idle for the majority of the time.
Autoscaling options such as HPA and the cluster
autoscaler are available, but in numerous cloud
environments, provisioning a new node isn’t
in
stantaneous. Typically, there’s a lag of several
minutes, which presents a concern for time-sensitive
tasks. Spot instances can assist in reducing costs, but
they introduce a new issue: they may vanish at any given
moment. If your ETL operations are not designed to
accommodate interruptions
—
by retrying or resuming
smoothly
—
you risk data loss or the necessity of
restarting entire workflows.
D. Security and Compliance Concerns
When handling sensitive information
—
such as
healthcare data, financial records, or personally
identifiable
information
—
security
is
paramount.
Kubernetes provides tools like Secrets and RBAC, yet
misconfigurations are commonplace. It can be
surprisingly simple to inadvertently expose credentials
or maintain excessively permissive roles, particularly
when teams are operating at a rapid pace.
8.
Best Practices and Recommendations
Companies should make sure that their engineering
methods are in line with cloud-native ideas in order to
get the most out of Kubernetes for managing ETL
workloads in a production environment. The following
suggestions are based on study done in school, real-
world experience, and best practices in platform
engineering.
A.
Make containers that are stateless and idempotent:
The idea of statelessness is very important for keeping
distributed systems reliable.ETL parts should be made as
stateless containers that let you restart, retry, or switch
without putting the integrity of the data at risk.
Idempotency is important for accuracy, especially when
trying again, because it makes sure that repeating
operations gives the same outcomes. utilizing upserts
when uploading databases, hashing datasets to stop
duplicates, or utilizing run-specific identifiers in
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
123
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
intermediate outputs to stop conflicts are all good
solutions.
B. Use jobs and DAGs wisely:
Kubernetes has strong execution primitives like Jobs and
CronJobs, and it interacts with tools that are based on
Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs), such Argo Workflows
and Apache Airflow. Best practices include separating
important processes (like data acquisition and
transformation) from less important ones (like providing
alarms).
•
Making transformation containers with logic that
works on its own and managing dependencies in a
declarative way.
•
Setting restrictions on retries, using backoff
methods, and setting timeouts to stop jobs from
running away.
•
Using init containers or sidecars to verify if input is
available or to send messages on whether
something worked or didn't.
This modular method makes it easier to find and fix
problems and keep pipelines running.
C.
Use GitOps and Infrastructure-as-Cod
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) tools like Helm, Kustomize,
or Terraform should be used to declaratively specify all
ETL setups. When used with GitOps tools like ArgoCD or
Flux, this method makes sure that all changes are
version-controlled, can be tracked, and can be made
again in other settings. Benefits include:
•
Quick rollbacks if there are difficulties with the
pipeline.
•
Automatically and consistently moving updates
from development to production.
•
Better traceability of configuration changes, which is
important for debugging and compliance auditing.
D.
Include metrics, tracing, and data validation
from the start:
Pipeline architecture should focus on observability.
Some best practices are:
•
Using Prometheus to collect infrastructure
measurements and Grafana to show how well the
pipeline is working.
•
Using Fluentd, Fluent Bit, or Loki to combine logs so
that searching and alerting may happen in one place
•
Using OpenTelemetry or Jaeger to track the life cycle
of ETL processes that have more than one stage.
•
Using tools like Great Expectations, Deequ, or Soda
Core to check the data for schema drift, null
anomalies, and integrity problems before it gets to
downstream systems.
This proactive strategy builds a culture of trust,
openness, and quicker problem fixing.
E.
Use Network Policies or Service Mesh to keep
communication safe:
As ETL pipelines get more complicated and include more
services and namespaces, the necessity for secure
communication becomes more and more crucial.
Kubernetes-native policies can limit network traffic at
the pod level. Service meshes like Istio or Linker d, on
the other hand, offer
mTLS encryption, traffic visibility, and failure recovery at
the service layer. Some important rules are:
•
Using Kubernetes Network Policies to control egress
and ingress by namespace or label.
•
Protecting communication within the cluster by
using private endpoints and internal DNS.
•
Using mTLS to encrypt communications between
microservices to protect against man-in-the- middle
attacks.
Following these patterns helps protect sensitive data
while it's being sent and encourages safe-by- default
practices for production data pipelines.
9.
Conclusion:
As data engineering workflows continue to grow in
complexity, scalability, and importance for businesses,
Kubernetes has become a compelling platform for
orchestrating Extract-Transform- Load (ETL) processes in
production settings. Its foundation in cloud-native
technologies, characterized by declarative resource
management,
fault-tolerant
execution,
and
infrastructure abstraction, makes it particularly effective
for developing modular, resilient, and scalable data
pipelines. This paper has demonstrated how the various
phases of ETL
—
including data ingestion, transformation,
and loading
—
can be broken down into separate
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
124
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
microservices and managed using Kubernetes primitives
like Jobs, Cron Jobs, Stateful Sets, and Persistent
Volumes. Each phase reaps the benefits of
containerization, which guarantees consistent runtime
environments,
resource
isolation,
and
easier
deployments. Additionally, integrating Kubernetes with
Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)-based orchestration tools
such as Argo Workflows and Apache Airflow allows for
precise control over task sequencing, retries, and
scheduling crucial aspects for reliable data pipeline
automation.
Operational reliability is further bolstered through built-
in observability tools like Prometheus, Grafana, and
Open Telemetry, which provide valuable insights into
system performance and task- level metrics. When
combined with data quality validation frameworks like
Great Expectations, these technologies offer thorough
monitoring of both system health and data integrity,
enabling proactive identification and resolution of
anomalies. However, transitioning to Kubernetes for ETL
orchestration does come with its challenges. The
platform poses a significant learning curve for
data engineering teams, necessitates a solid
understanding of infrastructure abstractions, and
requires meticulous configuration concerning security,
cost efficiency, and compliance. Despite these obstacles,
the Kubernetes ecosystem is evolving rapidly, with
open-source tools, community support, and best-
practice
documentation
becoming
increasingly
available, enhancing the platform's accessibility and
manageability.
Kubernetes presents a strong, adaptable foundation for
orchestrating production-level ETL workflows that are
both cloud-agnostic and user-friendly. As organizations
increasingly move towards real-time analytics,
automated data processes, and scalable architectural
designs, Kubernetes is likely to remain a key player in the
modern data engineering landscape. Future research
may concentrate on improving integrations with lineage
tracking systems, executing policy-driven orchestration
approaches, and utilizing machine learning for dynamic
resource optimization
—
each holding the potential to
enhance the reliability, efficiency, and transparency of
large-scale data workflows.
References
1.
Lekkala,
“The Role of Kubernetes in Automating
Data Pipeline Operations: From Development to
Monitoring,” SSRN, Jul. 2024.
2.
S. S. Shan, C. Wang, Y. Xia, Y. Zhan, and J. Zhang,
“KubeAdaptor: A Docking Framework for
Workflow
Containerization
on
Kubernetes,”
arXiv, Jul.
2022.
3.
H. Foidl, “Data Pipeline Quality: Influencing Factors,
Root Causes of Data-Related
Errors,”Information
Systems,
vol. 105,
Mar.
2024.
4.
C. Daniel Imberman, “Airflow on Kubernetes (Part
1): A Different Kind of Operator,”
Kubernetes Blog,
Jun. 2018.
5.
“Using Argo Workflows as a Framework for ETL,”
Start.io Blog,
Jun. 2022.
6.
“ETL
with
Argo
Workflows,”
Retailo
Tech (Medium),
2022.
7.
D.
Imberman, “Language Agnostic Airflow on
Kubernetes,”
Flynn, Aug.
2019.
8.
“Leveraging Apache Airflow® and Kubernetes
for
Data Processing,” Astronomer Blog, Aug. 2023.
9.
Hasan Farman, “My Journey with Apache Airflow on
Kubernetes,” Medium, Nov. 2024.
10.
S. Muvva, “Data Pipeline Orchestration and
Automation: Enhancing Efficiency and Reliability in
Big Data Environments,” Int.
J. Core Eng. Mgmt., vol.
6, no. 11, Feb. 2025.
11.
N. Nikolov et
al.,
“Internet
of
Things,”
comparison
study, 2021.
12.
Pogiatzis et al., “An Event
-Driven Serverless ETL
Pipeline on AWS,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, Jan. 2021.
13.
M. B. Barletta et al., “Mutiny! How Does Kubernetes
Fail, and What Can We Do About It?,”
arXiv, Apr.
2024.
14.
Y. Xiang et al., “Simplifying Root Cause Analysis in
Kubernetes with StateGraph and LLM,”
arXiv, Jun.
2025.
15.
E. Truyen, D. Van Landuyt, D. Preuveneers, B.
Lagaisse, and W. Joosen, “A Comprehensive
Feature
Comparison Study of Open-Source Container
Orchestration Frameworks,” arXiv 2020.
The American Journal of Engineering and Technology
125
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet
16.
Medeiros, G. Schieffer, J. Wahlgren, and I. Peng, “A
GPU-accelerated Molecular Docking Workflow with
Kubernetes and Apac
he Airflow,” arXiv, Oct. 2024.
