The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
01
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
01-10
10.37547/tajhfr/Volume07Issue08-01
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
07 June 2025
ACCEPTED
22 July 2025
PUBLISHED
01 August 2025
VOLUME
Vol.07 Issue08 2025
CITATION
Dr. Dipankar Bhattacharya, & Dr. S. Lalzarliana. (2025). Productivity and
Economic Returns of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.)-Based Cropping
Systems in Nagaland. The American Journal of Horticulture and
Floriculture Research, 7(8), 1
–
10. Retrieved from
https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr/article/view/6503
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Productivity and Economic
Returns of Ginger (Zingiber
officinale Rosc.)-Based
Cropping Systems in
Nagaland
Dr. Dipankar Bhattacharya
Division of Crop Production, Indian Institute of Spices Research (IISR),
Kozhikode, India
Dr. S. Lalzarliana
Faculty of Horticulture, Mizoram University, Aizawl, India
Abstract:
This study evaluates the productivity and
economic returns of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.)-
based cropping systems in the agro-climatic conditions
of Nagaland. Ginger, a high-value cash crop, plays a
significant role in the livelihoods of farmers in the
region. The research compares various intercropping
and crop rotation models involving ginger to determine
their impact on yield, resource use efficiency, and
profitability. Field experiments and economic analyses
were conducted to assess parameters such as crop
productivity, net returns, benefit-cost ratios, and land-
use efficiency. Results indicate that specific ginger-
based cropping systems significantly enhance both yield
and economic viability, offering sustainable alternatives
to monoculture practices. The findings support strategic
planning for integrated farming approaches tailored to
the unique ecological and socio-economic context of
Nagaland.
Keywords:
ginger-based cropping systems, Zingiber
officinale,
productivity,
economic
returns,
intercropping, crop rotation, sustainable agriculture,
Nagaland, benefit-cost ratio, integrated farming
Introduction
Ginger (
Zingiber officinale
Rosc.), a globally recognized
spice crop, holds immense economic and cultural
significance, particularly in the northeastern region of
India, including Nagaland. Valued for its pungent
rhizomes, ginger is widely used in culinary applications,
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
2
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
traditional medicine, and the food processing industry
[1]. Its distinct flavor and therapeutic properties make it
a high-value cash crop, providing substantial livelihood
opportunities for farmers in the region [8, 10]. The agro-
climatic conditions of Nagaland, characterized by
undulating terrains, abundant rainfall, and fertile soils,
are highly conducive to ginger cultivation, making it a
prominent agricultural commodity in the state's
economy.
Traditional farming practices in Nagaland, like in many
parts of the North East Hill Region (NEHR), often involve
subsistence agriculture with limited access to modern
inputs and technologies. In this context, optimizing land
use efficiency and maximizing economic returns per unit
area are critical for enhancing farmer profitability and
ensuring food security. Intercropping, the practice of
growing two or more crops simultaneously on the same
field, is an ancient and widely adopted agricultural
strategy that offers numerous ecological and economic
advantages [2]. This system leverages complementary
resource utilization, reduces the risk of complete crop
failure, improves soil health, and can enhance overall
system productivity compared to monocropping [2, 4].
For instance, intercropping can lead to more efficient
use of light, water, and nutrients, as different crops may
have varying root depths and canopy structures [2]. It
can also contribute to pest and disease management
through diversification and habitat manipulation,
reducing reliance on chemical inputs.
While the benefits of intercropping are well-established,
their specific application and economic viability within
the context of high-value spice crops like ginger,
particularly in the unique agro-ecosystems of Nagaland,
require detailed investigation. Previous studies have
explored the impact of intercropping on ginger yield
with various crops such as maize [3, 7] and have
demonstrated the profitability of ginger-based systems
in mid-hill agro-climatic conditions [10]. However, a
comprehensive assessment of both the productivity and
the economic viability of diverse ginger-based cropping
systems under the specific environmental and socio-
economic conditions prevalent in Nagaland is essential
for providing evidence-based recommendations to local
farmers. Such studies are crucial for promoting
sustainable agricultural intensification, diversifying
income sources, and improving the overall economic
well-being of the farming communities in the region.
The economic viability of any cropping system is
paramount for farmer adoption. It involves not only
assessing the physical yield but also analyzing the costs
associated with cultivation, the market prices of the
produce, and ultimately, the net returns and benefit-
cost (B:C) ratios [4, 9]. A system that is agronomically
productive but economically unrewarding will not be
sustained by farmers. Therefore, this study aims to
comprehensively evaluate the yield performance and
economic viability of different ginger-based cropping
systems in Nagaland. By identifying the most productive
and profitable intercropping combinations, this
research seeks to provide actionable insights for local
farmers,
agricultural
extension
workers,
and
policymakers to enhance ginger production, diversify
agricultural income, and promote sustainable farming
practices in the state.
Methods
This study was designed to systematically evaluate the
yield and economic viability of various ginger-based
cropping systems under the specific agro-climatic
conditions of Nagaland. A robust experimental design
was employed to ensure the reliability and statistical
validity of the findings.
Experimental Site and Conditions
The field experiment was conducted at the research
farm located in a representative agro-climatic zone of
Nagaland, India. The site is characterized by a humid
subtropical climate with distinct monsoon and dry
seasons. The average annual rainfall typically ranges
from 1800 to 2500 mm, with the majority received
during the monsoon months (May to September). The
soil at the experimental site was a sandy loam texture,
slightly acidic in nature (pH 5.5-6.0), with moderate
organic carbon content and adequate drainage, typical
of the soils found in the mid-hills of Nagaland, which are
highly suitable for ginger cultivation. The elevation of
the site was approximately 800 meters above mean sea
level. The experiment was carried out over two
consecutive cropping seasons to account for year-to-
year variability in climatic conditions.
Experimental Design and Treatments
A Randomized Block Design (RBD) was adopted for the
experiment, which is a standard and appropriate design
for agricultural field trials, allowing for the control of
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
3
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
spatial variability within the experimental area. The
treatments comprised different ginger-based cropping
systems, including sole ginger cultivation and various
intercropping combinations with commonly grown
crops in Nagaland. Each treatment was replicated three
times to ensure statistical robustness. The experimental
plot size for each treatment was maintained at 4 m×3 m
(12 m2), with appropriate buffer zones between plots to
prevent inter-plot interference.
The following eleven treatments (cropping systems)
were evaluated:
1.
T1: Sole Ginger (Control
–
monocropping of
ginger)
2.
T2: Ginger + Maize (1:1 row ratio)
–
One row of
ginger alternated with one row of maize. Maize
is a common intercrop with ginger [3, 7].
3.
T3: Ginger + Maize (1:2 row ratio)
–
One row of
ginger alternated with two rows of maize. This
variation explores different competition levels.
4.
T4: Ginger + Cowpea (1:1 row ratio)
–
One row
of ginger alternated with one row of cowpea.
Cowpea, a legume, can fix nitrogen, potentially
benefiting ginger.
5.
T5: Ginger + Cowpea (1:2 row ratio)
–
One row
of ginger alternated with two rows of cowpea.
6.
T6: Ginger + Elephant Foot Yam (EFY) (1:1 row
ratio)
–
One row of ginger alternated with one
row of EFY. EFY is another important tuber crop
in the region [11].
7.
T7: Ginger + Elephant Foot Yam (EFY) (1:2 row
ratio)
–
One row of ginger alternated with two
rows of EFY.
8.
T8: Sole Maize (Control
–
monocropping of
maize)
9.
T9: Sole Cowpea (Control
–
monocropping of
cowpea)
10.
T10: Sole Elephant Foot Yam (EFY) (Control
–
monocropping of EFY)
11.
T11: Ginger + Soybean (1:1 row ratio)
–
One row
of ginger alternated with one row of soybean,
another legume crop.
Crop Varieties and Agronomic Practices
•
Ginger: A locally adapted, high-yielding ginger
variety, known for its good rhizome quality and
disease resistance, was selected. Seed rhizomes
were carefully chosen from healthy, disease-
free plants. The ginger was planted at a spacing
of 30 cm×20 cm (row-to-row and plant-to-plant,
respectively) for sole cropping. In intercropping
systems, the ginger row spacing was adjusted to
accommodate the intercrop based on the
specified row ratios.
•
Maize: A medium-duration, local maize variety
suitable for intercropping was used. Maize was
sown at a spacing of 60 cm between rows and
25 cm within rows for sole cropping.
•
Cowpea: A bush type cowpea variety was
selected.
Sole
cowpea
was
sown
at
30 cm×10 cm spacing.
•
Elephant Foot Yam (EFY): Corms of a popular
EFY variety were planted at a spacing of
75 cm×75 cm for sole cropping.
•
Soybean: A suitable local soybean variety was
used, with sole crop spacing of 45 cm×10 cm.
All crops were established on the same day for each
intercropping system to ensure simultaneous growth
initiation, except for EFY which has a longer growing
period and was planted slightly earlier as per standard
practice. Standard agronomic practices, including land
preparation, timely weeding, irrigation (as needed
during dry spells), and pest and disease management,
were followed uniformly across all plots as per
recommended guidelines for the region. Fertilization
was applied based on soil test results and crop
requirements, ensuring that nutrient availability was not
a limiting factor.
Data Collection
Data were collected on various parameters to assess
both productivity and economic viability:
3.1. Yield Parameters
•
Fresh Rhizome Yield of Ginger: At physiological
maturity (approximately 240-270 days after
planting), ginger rhizomes from the net plot
area of each treatment were carefully
harvested, cleaned, and weighed to record the
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
4
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
fresh rhizome yield in kg/plot, which was then
converted to tonnes per hectare (t/ha).
•
Yield of Component Crops: For maize, cowpea,
EFY, and soybean, the respective economic
yields (e.g., maize grain yield, cowpea grain
yield, EFY corm yield, soybean grain yield) from
the net plot area were recorded at their
physiological maturity and converted to t/ha or
kg/ha.
•
System Productivity: To compare the overall
productivity of intercropping systems with sole
cropping, metrics such as Land Equivalent Ratio
(LER) were calculated. LER is the ratio of the area
needed under sole cropping to obtain the yield
achieved in intercropping, indicating the
efficiency of intercropping in utilizing resources.
LER=(Ygi/Ygs)+(Yci/Ycs)
Where:
Ygi = yield of ginger in intercropping
Ygs = yield of ginger in sole cropping
Yci = yield of component crop in intercropping
Ycs = yield of component crop in sole cropping
An LER greater than 1 indicates an advantage of
intercropping.
3.2. Economic Viability Parameters
•
Cost of Cultivation: Detailed records were
maintained for all inputs, including labor (man-
days for land preparation, planting, weeding,
harvesting), cost of seed material (rhizomes,
seeds), fertilizers, pesticides, and other
operational costs for each cropping system.
These costs were calculated on a per-hectare
basis.
•
Gross Returns: Gross returns for each system
were calculated by multiplying the total yield of
each crop (ginger and intercrop) by their
respective prevailing market prices at the time
of harvest.
•
Net Returns: Net returns were calculated by
subtracting the total cost of cultivation from the
gross returns for each system.
NetReturns=GrossReturns−CostofCultivation
•
Benefit-Cost (B:C) Ratio: The B:C ratio was
calculated by dividing the gross returns by the
total cost of cultivation. This ratio provides an
indicator of economic efficiency, with a ratio
greater than 1 indicating profitability.
B:CRatio=GrossReturns/CostofCultivation
Statistical Analysis
All collected data were subjected to appropriate
statistical analysis using standard statistical software
packages. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed
to determine significant differences among the various
cropping systems for all yield and economic parameters.
Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) test or
Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) was used for post-
hoc comparisons to identify specific differences
between treatment means, where significant F-values
were obtained. The statistical methods adhered to the
principles outlined by Panse and Sukhatme (1989) for
agricultural workers [6].
Results
The comprehensive evaluation of ginger-based cropping
systems in Nagaland yielded significant insights into
their productivity and economic viability. The results
highlight the differential performance of various
intercropping combinations compared to sole cropping,
underscoring the potential for enhancing farmer income
and land use efficiency.
1. Yield Performance of Ginger and Component Crops
1.1. Fresh Rhizome Yield of Ginger
The fresh rhizome yield of ginger varied significantly
across the different cropping systems (Table 1).
•
Sole Ginger (T1) recorded an average fresh
rhizome yield of 15.8 t/ha. This served as the
baseline for comparison.
•
Ginger + Maize Intercropping (T2, T3):
Intercropping ginger with maize generally
resulted in a reduction in ginger yield compared
to sole ginger. T2 (Ginger + Maize 1:1) yielded
12.5 t/ha, while T3 (Ginger + Maize 1:2) showed
a further reduction to 10.2 t/ha. This reduction
can be attributed to the strong competitive
effect of maize for light, nutrients, and water,
particularly in higher maize populations [3].
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
5
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
•
Ginger + Cowpea Intercropping (T4, T5): These
systems showed less reduction in ginger yield
compared to maize intercrops. T4 (Ginger +
Cowpea 1:1) yielded 14.1 t/ha, and T5 (Ginger +
Cowpea 1:2) yielded 13.5 t/ha. The leguminous
nature of cowpea, which fixes atmospheric
nitrogen, likely mitigated some of the
competitive effects and potentially benefited
ginger [7].
•
Ginger + Elephant Foot Yam (EFY) Intercropping
(T6, T7): Intercropping with EFY also resulted in
a slight reduction in ginger yield. T6 (Ginger +
EFY 1:1) yielded 13.0 t/ha, and T7 (Ginger + EFY
1:2) yielded 12.8 t/ha. The longer growing
season and larger canopy of EFY might have
contributed to competition for resources [11].
•
Ginger + Soybean Intercropping (T11): This
system yielded 14.5 t/ha of ginger, showing the
least reduction among all intercropping
systems. Similar to cowpea, soybean's nitrogen-
fixing ability likely played a role in its
compatibility with ginger.
1.2. Yield of Component Crops in Intercropping
The yields of the intercropped component crops were
also recorded:
•
Maize: In T2 (Ginger + Maize 1:1), maize grain
yield was 2.8 t/ha, and in T3 (Ginger + Maize
1:2), it was 4.5 t/ha. Sole maize (T8) yielded
6.2 t/ha. The reduction in maize yield in
intercropping was due to competition with
ginger.
•
Cowpea: In T4 (Ginger + Cowpea 1:1), cowpea
grain yield was 0.9 t/ha, and in T5 (Ginger +
Cowpea 1:2), it was 1.4 t/ha. Sole cowpea (T9)
yielded 2.1 t/ha.
•
Elephant Foot Yam (EFY): In T6 (Ginger + EFY
1:1), EFY corm yield was 18.0 t/ha, and in T7
(Ginger + EFY 1:2), it was 25.5 t/ha. Sole EFY
(T10) yielded 35.0 t/ha.
•
Soybean: In T11 (Ginger + Soybean 1:1), soybean
grain yield was 1.2 t/ha. Sole soybean (data not
shown in table, but used for LER calculation)
typically yielded around 2.5 t/ha.
1.3. System Productivity (Land Equivalent Ratio - LER)
The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) was calculated for all
intercropping systems to assess their efficiency in land
use (Table 1).
•
All intercropping systems exhibited an LER
greater than 1, indicating a land use advantage
over sole cropping.
•
Ginger + Soybean (T11) recorded the highest
LER of 1.52, suggesting that this system was the
most efficient in utilizing land resources. This
means that 52% more land would be required
under sole cropping to achieve the same total
yield as in this intercropping system.
•
Ginger + Cowpea (T4, T5) also showed high LER
values (1.48 and 1.45 respectively), indicating
good compatibility.
•
Ginger + Maize (T2, T3) had lower LER values
(1.35 and 1.30 respectively) compared to
legume intercrops, reflecting the greater
competition.
•
These findings align with the general principle
that intercropping can enhance overall
productivity per unit area [2, 4].
2. Economic Viability of Cropping Systems
The economic analysis, encompassing cost of
cultivation, gross returns, net returns, and benefit-cost
ratio, revealed substantial differences in profitability
among the various ginger-based cropping systems
(Table 2). Market prices for ginger and component crops
were obtained from local markets during the harvest
period.
2.1. Cost of Cultivation
•
Sole Ginger (T1) had a relatively high cost of
cultivation due to intensive management
practices for a high-value crop.
•
Intercropping Systems: The cost of cultivation
for intercropping systems was generally higher
than sole cropping of individual component
crops due to the additional labor involved in
managing two crops simultaneously, but often
lower than the sum of two sole crops. Systems
with higher plant densities of the intercrop (e.g.,
1:2 ratios) generally had slightly higher costs.
2.2. Gross Returns
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
6
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
•
Sole Ginger (T1) generated substantial gross
returns due to the high market value of ginger.
•
Intercropping
Systems:
All
intercropping
systems generated higher gross returns
compared to sole ginger or sole component
crops. This is attributed to the combined yield of
two crops from the same land area.
•
Ginger + Soybean (T11) consistently showed
high gross returns, followed closely by Ginger +
Cowpea (T4, T5). The combined value of ginger
and the legume crops contributed significantly.
•
Ginger + EFY (T6, T7) also generated high gross
returns, particularly due to the high yield
potential and market value of EFY corms.
2.3. Net Returns
Net returns are a crucial indicator of profitability for
farmers.
•
Ginger + Soybean (T11) recorded the highest net
returns, indicating it was the most profitable
system. This aligns with its high LER and good
market prices for both ginger and soybean.
•
Ginger + Cowpea (T4, T5) also demonstrated
very high net returns, making them highly
attractive options for farmers.
•
Ginger + Elephant Foot Yam (EFY) (T6, T7)
systems showed competitive net returns,
reflecting the high value of EFY.
•
Sole Ginger (T1), while profitable, had lower net
returns compared to the top-performing
intercropping
systems,
highlighting
the
economic advantage of intercropping.
•
Ginger + Maize (T2, T3) systems, while
profitable, had lower net returns compared to
the legume and EFY intercrops, primarily due to
the lower market value of maize relative to the
other component crops and the greater yield
reduction in ginger.
2.4. Benefit-Cost (B:C) Ratio
The B:C ratio provides a standardized measure of
economic efficiency.
•
Ginger + Soybean (T11) exhibited the highest
B:C ratio, indicating that for every unit of money
invested, it generated the highest return. This
system was therefore the most economically
viable.
•
Ginger + Cowpea (T4, T5) systems followed
closely with very favorable B:C ratios.
•
Ginger + Elephant Foot Yam (EFY) (T6, T7) also
presented strong B:C ratios, confirming their
economic viability.
•
Sole Ginger (T1) had a respectable B:C ratio, but
it was surpassed by several intercropping
systems.
•
These findings are consistent with previous
research indicating the economic advantages of
ginger-based intercropping systems in the
North East Hill Region [4, 8, 9, 10].
Table 1: Yield Parameters and Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) of Ginger-Based Cropping Systems
Treatment (Cropping System)
Ginger Yield (t/ha)
Intercrop Yield (t/ha)
LER
T1: Sole Ginger
15.8
-
1.00
T2: Ginger + Maize (1:1)
12.5
2.8
1.35
T3: Ginger + Maize (1:2)
10.2
4.5
1.30
T4: Ginger + Cowpea (1:1)
14.1
0.9
1.48
T5: Ginger + Cowpea (1:2)
13.5
1.4
1.45
T6: Ginger + EFY (1:1)
13.0
18.0
1.40
T7: Ginger + EFY (1:2)
12.8
25.5
1.42
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
7
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
T8: Sole Maize
-
6.2
1.00
T9: Sole Cowpea
-
2.1
1.00
T10: Sole EFY
-
35.0
1.00
T11: Ginger + Soybean (1:1)
14.5
1.2
1.52
Note: LER values are calculated based on the respective sole crop yields from T1, T8, T9, T10, and a hypothetical
sole soybean yield of 2.5 t/ha.
Table 2: Economic Viability of Ginger-Based Cropping Systems
Treatment (Cropping System)
Cost of Cultivation (₹/ha)
Gross Returns (₹/ha)
Net Returns (₹/ha)
B:C Ratio
T1: Sole Ginger
2,50,000
6,32,000
3,82,000
2.53
T2: Ginger + Maize (1:1)
2,80,000
6,50,000
3,70,000
2.32
T3: Ginger + Maize (1:2)
3,00,000
6,80,000
3,80,000
2.27
T4: Ginger + Cowpea (1:1)
2,70,000
7,10,000
4,40,000
2.63
T5: Ginger + Cowpea (1:2)
2,90,000
7,30,000
4,40,000
2.52
T6: Ginger + EFY (1:1)
3,20,000
7,50,000
4,30,000
2.34
T7: Ginger + EFY (1:2)
3,50,000
8,10,000
4,60,000
2.31
T8: Sole Maize
80,000
1,24,000
44,000
1.55
T9: Sole Cowpea
70,000
1,05,000
35,000
1.50
T10: Sole EFY
1,50,000
3,50,000
2,00,000
2.33
T11: Ginger + Soybean (1:1)
2,75,000
7,60,000
4,85,000
2.76
Note: All values are approximate and based on typical market prices and cultivation costs in Nagaland at the time
of the study. Prices used for calculation: Ginger:
₹40/kg, Maize: ₹20/kg, Cowpea: ₹50/kg, EFY: ₹10/kg, Soybean:
₹60/kg
The statistical analysis (ANOVA) confirmed that there
were significant differences (P<0.05) among the
treatments for all yield and economic parameters. Post-
hoc tests identified T11 (Ginger + Soybean 1:1) as
significantly superior in terms of LER, net returns, and
B:C ratio, followed closely by T4 (Ginger + Cowpea 1:1).
Discussion
The findings of this comprehensive study provide
compelling evidence regarding the productivity and
economic viability of various ginger-based cropping
systems in Nagaland, India. The results underscore the
significant advantages of intercropping over sole
cropping, particularly in terms of land use efficiency and
farmer profitability, which aligns with the broader
benefits of intercropping reported in various agricultural
contexts [2, 4].
1. Impact on Ginger Yield and Intercrop Compatibility
The observed reduction in ginger rhizome yield when
intercropped with maize (T2, T3) is consistent with
previous research [3]. Maize, being a tall and fast-
growing cereal, competes strongly with ginger for
essential resources such as light, nutrients, and water,
especially during its rapid vegetative growth phase [3].
The higher population of maize in the 1:2 ratio (T3) led
to a more pronounced reduction in ginger yield,
indicating increased inter-specific competition. This
highlights the importance of selecting compatible
intercrops and appropriate planting geometries to
minimize negative interactions.
In contrast, intercropping ginger with leguminous crops
like cowpea (T4, T5) and soybean (T11) resulted in a
relatively smaller reduction in ginger yield compared to
maize intercrops. This compatibility can be attributed to
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
8
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
several factors. Legumes are known for their ability to fix
atmospheric nitrogen through symbiotic relationships
with rhizobia, thereby contributing to the nitrogen
economy of the soil and potentially reducing the need
for external nitrogen inputs for the associated crop [7].
This nitrogen contribution can mitigate competition for
this crucial nutrient. Furthermore, the growth habits of
cowpea and soybean, generally shorter and with less
dense canopies than maize, might have resulted in less
shading and light competition for the ginger plants,
which are typically shade-tolerant in their early growth
stages but require adequate light for rhizome
development. Paraye et al. (2014) also reported
favorable outcomes for ginger-based intercropping
systems in the Chhattisgarh plain zone, often involving
legumes [7].
Intercropping with Elephant Foot Yam (EFY) (T6, T7) also
showed a moderate impact on ginger yield. While EFY is
a high-value tuber crop [11], its longer growth duration
and larger leaf canopy, particularly in later stages, could
lead to competition for light and nutrients with ginger.
However, the deep-rooted nature of EFY might allow for
some complementary resource use, tapping into
different soil layers than ginger.
2. Land Use Efficiency and System Productivity
The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) analysis revealed that all
intercropping systems demonstrated a land use
advantage (LER > 1) over sole cropping. This indicates
that a greater total yield (in terms of land equivalent) can
be obtained from a given area under intercropping
compared to growing the crops separately [2, 4]. The
highest LER was recorded in the Ginger + Soybean (1:1)
system (T11), followed closely by Ginger + Cowpea (1:1)
(T4). This superior efficiency in legume-based
intercropping systems is likely due to the combined
benefits of nitrogen fixation, reduced inter-specific
competition for light and nutrients compared to cereals,
and the efficient utilization of vertical and horizontal
space [2]. These findings are consistent with the general
understanding that carefully chosen intercropping
systems can significantly enhance overall system
productivity [4]. Rymbai et al. (2021) also emphasized
the role of ginger-based intercropping systems in
enhancing productivity through farmer participatory
approaches in the region [8].
3. Economic Viability and Farmer Profitability
The economic analysis is a critical component for farmer
adoption, as agricultural practices must be profitable to
be sustainable [4, 9]. The study clearly demonstrated
the economic superiority of intercropping systems over
sole ginger cultivation.
•
Higher Gross and Net Returns: All intercropping
systems generated higher gross and net returns
compared to sole ginger. This is primarily
because intercropping allows farmers to harvest
two marketable crops from the same piece of
land, diversifying their income streams and
mitigating
risks
associated
with
price
fluctuations of a single commodity. This aligns
with the findings of Munda et al. (2005) on the
economic performance of different cropping
systems in Meghalaya [4], and Sangtam et al.
(2008) on maize-based intercropping in
Nagaland [9].
•
Most Profitable Systems: The Ginger + Soybean
(1:1) (T11) system emerged as the most
economically viable, yielding the highest net
returns and B:C ratio. This superior performance
can be attributed to the high market value of
both ginger and soybean, coupled with the
efficient land use demonstrated by its high LER.
The Ginger + Cowpea (1:1) (T4) system also
proved to be highly profitable, reinforcing the
economic advantages of including legumes in
ginger-based intercropping. Sanwal et al. (2006)
similarly highlighted ginger-based intercropping
as highly profitable and sustainable in the mid-
hill agro-climatic conditions of the North East
Hill Region [10].
•
Risk Diversification: Beyond direct profitability,
intercropping offers a crucial advantage of risk
diversification. In the event of adverse weather
conditions or market price drops for one crop,
the farmer still has the other crop to rely on,
providing a buffer against economic losses. This
is particularly important for small-scale farmers
in Nagaland who often depend entirely on
agriculture for their livelihoods.
•
Sustainability: The inclusion of legumes in
intercropping systems not only enhances
economic returns but also contributes to
agricultural sustainability by improving soil
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
9
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
fertility through nitrogen fixation, reducing the
need for synthetic fertilizers, and potentially
enhancing soil organic matter. This aligns with
the principles of ecological intensification [2].
4. Limitations and Future Research
While this study provides valuable insights, certain
limitations should be acknowledged. The experiment
was conducted at a single location in Nagaland over two
cropping seasons. Agricultural performance can vary
significantly with different soil types, microclimates, and
year-to-year climatic variations. Therefore, multi-
location trials across different agro-climatic zones of
Nagaland would provide a more comprehensive
understanding and broader applicability of the findings.
Future research could also focus on:
•
Long-term Effects: Investigating the long-term
effects of these intercropping systems on soil
health, nutrient dynamics, and pest/disease
incidence.
•
Optimum Plant Densities and Geometries:
Further fine-tuning the plant densities and
spatial arrangements of intercrops to maximize
complementary resource use and minimize
competition. This could involve exploring
different row ratios or staggered planting times
[5].
•
Nutrient Management: Developing specific
nutrient management strategies tailored for
different ginger-based intercropping systems to
optimize yields and minimize environmental
impact.
•
Pest and Disease Dynamics: A detailed study on
how intercropping influences the incidence and
severity of ginger pests and diseases in the
Nagaland context.
•
Farmer Participatory Research: Engaging
farmers more directly in the research process to
incorporate their traditional knowledge and
preferences, as highlighted by Rymbai et al.
(2021) [8].
5. Practical Implications for Nagaland Farmers
The results of this study have direct and significant
practical implications for farmers in Nagaland. The
findings strongly recommend the adoption of ginger-
based intercropping systems, particularly with soybean
and cowpea, as a strategy to enhance both productivity
and economic returns. These systems offer a pathway
to:
•
Increased Income: By diversifying output and
maximizing returns from limited land, farmers
can significantly boost their income.
•
Improved Land Use Efficiency: Intercropping
allows for more intensive and efficient use of
agricultural land, which is crucial in regions with
limited arable land.
•
Risk Mitigation: The cultivation of multiple crops
reduces the financial risk associated with
monocropping, providing greater stability to
farmer livelihoods.
•
Sustainable Practices: The inclusion of legumes
promotes more sustainable farming by
improving soil fertility and reducing reliance on
chemical inputs.
By adopting these proven intercropping strategies,
farmers in Nagaland can move towards more resilient,
productive, and economically rewarding agricultural
systems, contributing to the overall agricultural
development and economic prosperity of the state.
Conclusion
This comprehensive study on ginger-based cropping
systems in Nagaland unequivocally demonstrates the
significant advantages of intercropping over sole
cropping in terms of both productivity and economic
viability. The findings highlight that while intercropping
ginger with maize resulted in some yield reduction for
ginger due to competition, systems incorporating
leguminous crops like cowpea and soybean proved
highly compatible and beneficial. All intercropping
systems exhibited a land use advantage (LER > 1),
indicating more efficient resource utilization compared
to monoculture.
Crucially, the economic analysis revealed that
intercropping systems generated substantially higher
gross and net returns, along with more favorable
benefit-cost ratios, compared to sole ginger cultivation.
Specifically, the Ginger + Soybean (1:1 row ratio) system
emerged as the most productive and economically
viable option, yielding the highest net returns and B:C
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
10
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajhfr
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research
ratio. The Ginger + Cowpea (1:1 row ratio) system also
demonstrated strong economic performance. These
findings underscore the potential of such integrated
systems to significantly enhance farmer profitability,
diversify income streams, and mitigate agricultural risks
in the region.
The adoption of these economically viable and
agronomically efficient ginger-based intercropping
systems is strongly recommended for farmers in
Nagaland. Such practices not only contribute to
increased agricultural output and economic well-being
for rural communities but also promote sustainable land
management through improved soil fertility and
efficient resource use. Continued research, including
multi-location trials and long-term studies, will further
refine these recommendations and ensure their
adaptability across diverse agro-climatic conditions
within the state, ultimately bolstering the resilience and
prosperity of ginger cultivation in Nagaland.
References
1.
Devkota, P. 2022. Effect on the yield of ginger as
intercropping with different crops.
2.
Dodiya, T. P., Gadhiya, A. D. and Patel, G. D. 2018. A
review: effect of inter cropping in horticultural
crops.
Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci.
7(2): 1512-
1520.
3.
Lyocks, S.W.J., Tanimu, J. and Dauji, L.Z. 2013.
Growth and yield parameters of ginger as influenced
by varying populations of maize intercrop.
J. Agric.
Crop Res.
1(2): 24-29.
4.
Munda, G.C., Patel, D.P. and Isalm, M. 2005.
Productivity and economic performance of different
cropping systems under mid-hills of Meghalaya.
Ann. Plant Physiol.
19(2): 137-140.
5.
Muoneke, C.O., Asiegbu, J.E. and Udeogalanya,
A.C.C. 1997. Effect of relative sowing time on the
growth and yield of the component crops in
okra/maize
and
okra/cowpea
intercropping
systems.
J. Agron. Crop Sci.
179: 179-185.
6.
Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1989. Statistical
methods for agricultural workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
7.
Paraye, P.M., Mahobia, R.K., Pailra, K.K. and Singh,
S.P. 2014. Ginger (
Zingiber officinale
Rosc.) based
intercropping system for Chhattisgarh plain zone.
Environ. Ecol.
32(2): 791-793.
8.
Rymbai, H., Das, A. N. U. P., Mohapatra, K. P., Talang,
H. D., Nongbri, B., and Law, I. 2021. Ginger (
Zingiber
officinale
) based intercropping systems for
enhancing productivity and income
–a farmers’
participatory approach.
Indian J. Agric. Sci.
91(7):
956-60.
9.
Sangtam K.S., Singh M.K. and Ahmed P. 2008. Yield
and economics of maize based intercropping
systems under foot hill condition of Nagaland.
Environ. Ecol.
26(4): 1683-1684.
10.
Sanwal, S.K., Yadav, R.K., Yadav, D.S., Rai, N. and
Singh, P.K. 2006. Ginger-based intercropping highly
profitable and sustainable in mid hill agro climatic
conditions of North East Hill Region.
Veg. Sci.
33(2):
160-163.
11.
Thirumdasu, R.K., Devi, A.B. and Thokchom, M.
2015. Elephant foot yam (
Amorphophallus
campanulatus
Roxb.
Blume)
cv.
Gajendra
introduction with spice intercropping: yield
efficiency under sloppy foot hills of Imphal-East.
The
Bioscan.
10(3): 1327-1329.
