THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
13
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
PUBLISHED DATE: - 14-08-2024
DOI: -
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/Volume06Issue08-03
XENOPHOBIA IN AFRICA: ORIGINS AND ITS
MANIFESTATIONS
Olowonihi A Peter
PhD Student City University, Cambodia
Gloria Chigbu
Lecturer ESFAM-BENIN University, Benin Republic
Christopher M Osazuwa
PhD Student City University, Cambodia
INTRODUCTION
Xenophobia, derived from the Greek words xenos
and Phobos, denotes apprehension or animosity
towards those who are unfamiliar or alien
(Maseng, 2024). Xenophobia, as defined by
Sundstrom (2013), is a profound repulsion, fear, or
animosity towards individuals from other
countries, frequently accompanied by suspicion
and mistrust based on cultural and ethnolinguistic
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Abstract
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
14
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
characteristics that distinguish them as different
from oneself (Tummala‐Narra, 2020). Xenophobia,
as defined by Mubangizi (2021), refers to an
unwarranted fear or distrust of those who are
unfamiliar or alien. Within the South African
context, this is evident through opposing views,
hostility, and prejudiced actions directed towards
individuals who are not citizens. This is consistent
with the more extensive definition of xenophobia
provided by McCorkle & Rodriguez (2023) and
emphasizes its occurrence in South Africa.
Lee (2019) builds upon Harris's (2002) definition
of
xenophobia,
suggesting
an
expanded
understanding that includes not only fear and
aversion, but also physical assault or aggression
directed towards foreigners. Xenophobic violence
can be directed towards both foreign nationals and
nationals who are viewed as foreign (Peucker &
Fisher, 2022). Xenophobia, as defined by Kerr et al.
(2019), is a broad concept that includes several
unpleasant emotions, such as fear, jealousy, hatred,
and distrust, as well as negative perceptions. These
emotions and perceptions can lead to violent or
discriminatory actions.
A recent study underscores the urgent need to
understand and address Xenophobia, particularly
in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. To
achieve this, a multidisciplinary approach is
necessary, considering the harmful effects of
racism, nationalism, and violence associated with
Xenophobia (Spencer, 2024). The pandemic has
exacerbated discriminatory attitudes, leading to a
rise in pervasive racism targeting specific
populations, such as Asians in the United States
(Wong-Padoongpatt et al., 2022). It is crucial to
explore the relationship between Xenophobia and
public health crises as well as societal attitudes,
especially considering the current anti-Asian
sentiments linked to COVID-19 (Kim & Shah,
2020).is particularly highlighted by the present
anti-Asian sentiments linked to COVID-19 (Kim &
Shah, 2020). Xenophobia and racism both perceive
individuals who are different as a source of danger,
resulting in prejudiced treatment and the act of
excluding them based on their inherent
characteristics, such as race or nationality (Tarisayi
et al., 2020). Both factors can lead to the
implementation of policies such as stricter
immigration controls. However, xenophobia is
characterized by a fear of foreigners rather than a
conviction in racial superiority (Yakushko, 2008).
The correlation between xenophobia and racism
underscores how these belief systems can mutually
strengthen one another, frequently leading to
prejudiced behaviours and policies of exclusion
(Marumo et al., 2019). Racism is the belief in the
superiority of one race over another, while
xenophobia is the dread and distrust of foreigners,
which is always based on apprehension (Diaz,
2023). It is essential to acknowledge that
xenophobic violence can be directed towards both
foreign nationals and persons who are mistakenly
seen as foreign, highlighting the widespread
prevalence of xenophobic sentiments (Mubangizi,
2021).
When discussing xenophobia, it is crucial to
examine its ramifications in specific settings, such
as South Africa, where xenophobic sentiments have
resulted in violent assaults and prejudice against
those who are not citizens of the country
(Mubangizi, 2021). The media's representation of
xenophobia has a significant impact on how the
public perceives and forms national identities,
hence reinforcing and sustaining xenophobic
societal attitudes (Freier & Pérez, 2021). Analyzing
xenophobia in the context of internal displacement
in Africa offers valuable insights into the
experiences and difficulties faced by vulnerable
groups (Tsheola et al., 2015).
Xenophobia is a complex phenomenon that
involves the rejection, exclusion, and vilification of
individuals who are viewed as outsiders or
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
15
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
foreigners. It impacts the identities of
communities, societies, or nations (Adeola, 2020).
The creation of a cumulative scale to assess fear-
driven xenophobia highlights the intricate
character of this notion, encompassing several
adverse emotions linked to xenophobic attitudes
(Sadiq & Nawaz, 2022).
Xenophobia and racism are closely related but
separate ideas. Xenophobia primarily focuses on
discriminating against individuals from different
countries. In contrast, racism is based on ingrained
biases and societal perceptions of physical
distinctions, highlighting the belief in the
dominance of one race over another. Both
phenomena perceive the outsider or the other as a
menace, resulting in prejudice and marginalization
based on inherent traits such as race or nationality.
This form of discrimination frequently leads to
implementing laws aimed at increasing restrictions
on immigration (Mubangizi, 2021).
Xenophobic incidents have been recorded in
several African countries, including Egypt, Kenya,
Ghana, Nigeria, and South Africa. In Egypt,
individuals seeking asylum, refugees, and migrants
from countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have been
subjected to acts of xenophobic and racist violence
(Tella, 2016). Somali migrants in Kenya have
encountered prejudice because of associations
with piracy and terrorism in their place of origin
(Tella, 2016). Xenophobia was observed in Ghana
during the Aliens Compliance Order era, resulting
in the expulsion of individuals primarily from
Burkina Faso and Nigeria (Tella, 2016). In South
Africa, foreign nationals have experienced attacks,
displacement, and violence because of perceived
risks to local employment and economic well-being
(Tella, 2016).
Xenophobia
has
diverse
characteristics,
encompassing individual, state, and international
dimensions. To effectively combat xenophobia, it is
necessary to thoroughly comprehend its origins
and its consequences on various aspects of society
(Tella, 2016). The historical and political causes,
including colonial legacies and economic issues,
persistently contribute to the growth of
xenophobic sentiments in South Africa and other
regions (Tella, 2016; Mthombeni, 2022).
In the latter part of the 20th century,
socioeconomic problems such as colonialism and
apartheid in Africa necessitated a comprehensive
approach to tackle them. Nevertheless, the ongoing
increase in xenophobic assaults within African
nations is resulting in divisive consequences,
generating discontent among governments
regarding the management of the situation. Several
African nations emphasize their previous
collaborative actions against apartheid in South
Africa and the subsequent significant commitment
of their workforce to the country's development in
diverse industries. However, immigrants in South
Africa currently encounter brutal and cruel
treatment, which has led to a significant increase in
xenophobic violence. This violence has resulted in
several problems, such as refugee crises, gang-
related crimes, and abuses of human rights
(Michalopoulos & Papaioannou, 2016; Alexander,
2010).
The escalation of xenophobic violence in Africa
presents both ethical dilemmas and intersects with
firmly rooted religious ideals inside African
civilizations. Africa's religious and spiritual aspects
influence shaping interpersonal connections and
fostering ethical superiority, reverence for human
worth, and the sanctity of life. Nevertheless, the
increase in xenophobic violence in Africa poses
ethical and religious quandaries that have
significant and long-lasting effects. There is a
noticeable absence of literature examining the
ethical
and
theological
consequences
of
xenophobia in African nations, a significant
problem that must be addressed (Yingi, 2023).
Xenophobic violence has wide-ranging social,
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
16
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
economic, and political implications that transcend
beyond local disputes. Scholars express worries
about the deterioration of social values in afflicted
communities, with some considering it a breach of
human rights. An in-depth comprehension of the
fundamental causes and consequences of
xenophobic violence in Africa is crucial due to the
intricate relationship between xenophobia, ethics,
religion, and societal values.
Statement of the Problem
While xenophobia is a global phenomenon, its
impact in Africa is particularly acute due to the
continent's complex history of colonialism, ethnic
diversity, and persistent socioeconomic challenges
(Neocosmos, 2022).
The root causes of xenophobia in Africa are diverse
and interconnected. Historical legacies, such as
colonialism and apartheid, have created lasting
divisions and inequalities that continue to fuel
xenophobic
sentiments
(Mamdani,
2020).
Economic disparities, resource scarcity, and
competition for jobs exacerbate tensions between
locals and immigrants, often leading to
scapegoating
and
violence
(Crush
&
Ramachandran, 2022). Political instability, weak
governance, and the manipulation of ethnic
identities for political gain further contribute to the
problem, creating an environment where
xenophobia can thrive (Cheeseman, 2023).
The consequences of xenophobia are far-reaching
and detrimental. It leads to violence, displacement,
and loss of life, creating humanitarian crises and
exacerbating regional instability (UNHCR, 2024).
Xenophobia also undermines social cohesion, trust,
and cooperation within communities, hindering
efforts to build inclusive and harmonious societies
(Monson & Abdul-Raheem, 2021). Economically, it
disrupts trade, investment, and development,
impeding progress and prosperity in affected
regions (World Bank, 2023). This paper will
examine xenophobia in Africa and its origin and
manifestations.
Aim of the Study
This study aims to investigate the origins and
manifestations of xenophobia in Africa, focusing on
understanding its root causes, social impact, and
potential solutions.
Objectives of the Study
I.
To examine the historical, social, economic,
and political factors contributing to African
xenophobia.
II.
To analyze the various manifestations of
xenophobia, including discrimination, violence,
and social exclusion.
III.
To assess the impact of xenophobia on
individuals, communities, and societies in Africa.
Significance of the Study
This study is crucial because it is imperative to
tackle xenophobia in Africa urgently. To effectively
address xenophobia, policymakers, practitioners,
and civil society organizations must comprehend
this phenomenon's underlying causes and visible
expressions. The study's results will aid in creating
evidence-based policies and actions that support
social unity, safeguard human rights, and cultivate
inclusive communities.
Moreover, this research will contribute to the
scholarly discussion on xenophobia in Africa,
addressing a significant deficiency in the current
div of literature. This study will offer unique
perspectives on the intricate dynamics of
xenophobia, its influence on different facets of
society, and viable strategies for intervention. The
study results will be distributed through scholarly
journals, conferences, and workshops, reaching a
broad audience of researchers, policymakers, and
professionals.
This study seeks to elucidate the roots and
expressions of xenophobia in Africa, thoroughly
comprehending this urgent matter. The study's
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
17
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
results will be crucial in formulating efficient
approaches to address xenophobia, enhance social
integration, and cultivate inclusive African
societies. The significance of the study's results
cannot be overstated in the fight against
xenophobia.
Conceptual Review
XENOPHOBIA
Xenophobia, which refers to the intense dread or
hatred towards individuals from other countries or
unfamiliar individuals, is a complex and profoundly
ingrained issue that has a lengthy historical
background and presents itself in many ways
throughout the African continent.
Xenophobia in Africa is deeply rooted in the pre-
colonial period, when tensions and conflicts
between diverse groups were driven by resource
rivalry and territorial disputes (Adepoju, 2008).
However, the surge in xenophobic sentiments can
largely be attributed to the colonial period, when
European nations established arbitrary boundaries
and fragmented ethnic communities, exacerbating
pre-existing conflicts and generating new ones
(Mamdani, 2020). The enduring impact of
colonialism, characterized by its emphasis on racial
stratification and marginalization, continues to
shape present-day perceptions of 'foreigners' in
many African nations (Monson & Abdul-Raheem,
2021).
During the post-colonial
era,
nationalist
movements emerged and led to the establishment
of sovereign African nations. Although these
advancements aimed to promote cohesion and
camaraderie among Africans, they also gave rise to
novel types of discrimination rooted in national
identity and citizenship (Neocosmos, 2022). The
notion of the "nation-state" frequently became
linked to the prevailing ethnic group, while
minority
groups
and
immigrants
were
marginalized and regarded with distrust
(Cheeseman, 2023).
Xenophobia in contemporary Africa takes on
various forms, including subtle acts of
discrimination and prejudice, as well as overt acts
of violence and hate speech. Xenophobic attitudes
are often linked to economic concerns like job and
resource competition (Crush & Ramachandran,
2022). Immigrants and refugees are frequently
scapegoated for economic hardships, leading to
social tensions and conflict (UNHCR, 2024).
Political circumstances also play a significant role
in fueling xenophobia. Leaders may exploit
xenophobic sentiments during political instability
or economic crises to gain support and divert
attention from their failings (Cheeseman, 2023).
This can lead to the implementation of
discriminatory policies and practices that worsen
the social exclusion and stigmatization of
immigrant populations (Monson & Abdul-Raheem,
2021).
The emergence of social media and digital
platforms has also intensified xenophobic rhetoric
and hate speech, creating a favorable environment
for the spread of false information and stereotypes
(Neocosmos, 2022). Online platforms provide a
means for people and groups to freely
communicate xenophobic beliefs without facing
consequences, which exacerbates social divisions
and hostility (Crush & Ramachandran, 2022).
Xenophobia in Africa is an intricate and diverse
problem that has its origins in the past and is
currently evident in many ways.
Racism
Racism in Africa is intricately linked to its colonial
past and persists in several manifestations in the
present day. The historical context is influenced by
the European colonization of the continent, which
established racial hierarchies and practiced
discrimination against Indigenous inhabitants.
In the colonial era, European powers implemented
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
18
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
systems of racial segregation and exploitation,
frequently grounded in pseudoscientific notions of
racial supremacy (Mamdani, 2020). Systems like
apartheid in South Africa marginalized Africans,
seeing them as inferior citizens, depriving them of
fundamental rights, and exploiting their labor and
resources (Crush & Ramachandran, 2022).
Colonialism's enduring impact is evident in
numerous African nations, where it continues to
influence
social,
economic,
and
political
frameworks, hence sustaining disparities and
fueling persistent racial conflicts (Neocosmos,
2022).
Despite the cessation of official colonial control,
racism continues to endure in Africa in diverse
manifestations. Discrimination in jobs, housing,
education, and healthcare is evident, resulting in
restricted
prospects
for
underprivileged
populations (Monson & Abdul-Raheem, 2021).
Xenophobia, which refers to the intense dread or
hostility towards individuals from other countries,
is frequently based on ethnic and racial biases. This
phenomenon has resulted in instances of violence,
forced migration, and societal instability
throughout several African nations (UNHCR,
2024). Afrophobia, defined as the phobia or
animosity towards individuals of African origin, is
evident in the form of bias and prejudice, both
within and beyond the African continent
(Neocosmos, 2022).
The emergence of social media and internet
platforms has created fresh channels for the
dissemination of racist beliefs and hate speech,
intensifying existing conflicts and inciting acts of
violence (Monson & Abdul-Raheem, 2021).
Furthermore, the presence of institutional racism
deeply ingrained within institutions and cultural
standards
persistently
hinders
specific
populations, hence perpetuating cycles of poverty
and marginalization (Cheeseman, 2023).
Colonialism
Africa has been profoundly affected by colonialism,
both in the past and in the present. The colonial era,
marked by the colonization of Africa by European
powers from the 15th century onwards, has had
long-lasting effects on the continent's institutional
and economic progress, which persist to this day.
Acemoğlu et al. (2004) and Maselan
d (2017). The
colonial state, founded as an external institution
distinct from local society, enforced its governing
systems, frequently ignoring native customs and
traditions, resulting in a feeling of illegitimacy and
detachment (Walle, 2009).
Africa's institutional frameworks and economic
systems bear the lasting impact of colonial history.
Scholars have emphasized the influence of colonial
powers' partitioning of Africa on present-day
conflict and development patterns (Besley &
Reynal‐Querol,
2014;
Mich
alopoulos
&
Papaioannou, 2016). The utilization of Africa's
abundant natural resources to fulfil Europe's
industrial requirements during the colonial period
solidified existing economic inequalities and power
imbalances that continue to endure in the present
era (Kalu, 2020).
Colonialism's influence in Africa goes beyond the
economic and political spheres, affecting societal
ideals,
cultural
identities,
and
personal
interactions. The colonial endeavor reconfigured
identities predicated on ethnicity, race, and
nationalism, establishing the foundation for
persistent conflicts around authority and portrayal
in the post-colonial epoch (Palmary, 2006). The
persistent dominance of colonial power continues
to impact current dynamics in African cultures,
molding citizenship, human sexuality, and political
governance (Stephens & Boonzaier, 2020).
Scholars have emphasized the enduring presence
of colonial-era structures and practices in present-
day
Africa
when
studying
colonialism's
institutional legacies. The legacy of colonialism has
resulted
in
profound
disparities,
social
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
19
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
disintegration, and difficulties in governance that
persistently impede the continent's progress
(Olaiya, 2020; Fenske, 2009). Postcolonial theory
highlights the direct influence of colonial history on
present-day interactions between Europe and
Africa, emphasizing the importance of addressing
historical injustices and power imbalances (Koeijer
et al., 2015). Analyzing colonialism's historical
backdrop and lasting impacts is imperative to
comprehending Africa's present socio-economic
environment and government systems.
Apartheid
The term "apartheid," originating from the
Afrikaans word for "separateness," is primarily
linked to the institutionalized system of racial
segregation and discrimination implemented by
the white minority government in South Africa
from 1948 to 1994. This system was distinguished
by the inflexible segregation of racial groups,
enforced by legislation and policies aimed at
upholding white dominance and exerting control
over political, economic, and social assets (Worden,
2004).
Nevertheless, the notion of apartheid and its
expressions transcend the historical circumstances
of South Africa. In Africa's history, both during and
after colonial times, several types of segregation,
discrimination, and exclusion have been witnessed,
frequently rooted in factors such as race, ethnicity,
nationality, or socioeconomic class. Although not
officially
classified
as
apartheid,
these
manifestations exhibit comparable traits in their
effect on underprivileged communities and the
persistence of inequity (Mamdani, 2020).
Throughout history, colonial powers in Africa
enforced policies that enforced segregation and
discrimination
against
native
populations,
frequently showing preference towards European
settlers and establishing racial hierarchies
(Ranger, 1983). Following the process of
decolonization, numerous African nations still
faced the enduring effects of colonialism, such as
social disparities, ethnic conflicts, and prejudiced
policies.
Xenophobia and Afrophobia in present-day Africa
exemplify the ongoing manifestation of the
ideology of apartheid. Instances of xenophobic
violence, specifically directed at individuals from
other countries, have occurred in several nations,
such as South Africa, Nigeria, and Kenya. These
incidents are primarily fueled by economic rivalry,
social unrest, and political exploitation (Crush &
Ramachandran, 2022). Afrophobia, which refers to
the fear or hatred of Africans or African culture,
continues to exist both within and outside the
continent. This results in the unfair treatment and
exclusion of African migrants and communities,
contributing to discrimination and marginalization
(Monson & Abdul-Raheem, 2021).
Moreover, the enduring effects of apartheid
persistently influence the social and economic
environments in numerous African nations. The
geographical segregation implemented during
apartheid, which involved the division of
residential areas, educational institutions, and
economic possibilities, still has enduring
consequences on inequality and social mobility
(Wesson, 2011). The enduring consequences of
systemic discrimination are apparent in the
unequal allocation of resources, wealth, and
opportunities in South Africa, even after the end of
apartheid (Neocosmos, 2022).
Although the term "apartheid" is linked to the
historical system of racial segregation in South
Africa, its fundamental principles and expressions
can be identified in diverse ways across Africa's
past and contemporary times. The enduring
significance of comprehending and tackling the
notion of apartheid in its broader African context is
underscored by the legacies of colonialism,
persistent xenophobia, Afrophobia, and the
persistence of social and economic inequities.
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
20
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
A Review of Xenophobia in Africa
African countries often have shared historical,
cultural, and traditional connections beyond
national boundaries (Monson & Abdul-Raheem,
2021). Nevertheless, xenophobic attacks hinder
these linkages and hinder social cohesiveness,
peaceful cohabitation, and effective governance,
amounting to a violation of human rights (Mlambo,
2019). Despite being commonly perceived as a
contemporary occurrence, xenophobia in Africa
has deep historical origins.
The origins of animosity towards immigrants and
biased immigration policies in South Africa may be
traced back to the early 20th century, specifically
directed towards groups such as the Indian
community (Jooste, 2012; Ramaswamy, 2010).
These policies encompassed segregation laws such
as the Urban Areas Act of 1923, which
implemented residential segregation based on
national origin, race, class, and gender.
Nevertheless, instances of xenophobic assaults in
Africa existed prior to the implementation of these
initial measures, as evidenced by reports of
Afrikaners pillaging British-owned stores in 1914
(Dick, 2005). This indicates that dissatisfaction
regarding the allocation of resources and societal
disparities has consistently played a role in
fostering xenophobic inclinations.
The current manifestation of xenophobia in South
Africa is frequently associated with the period
following the end of apartheid, as the dismantling
of apartheid and the liberalization of borders
resulted in a surge in migration (McConnell, 2015).
The unmet expectations of democracy, such as
elevated joblessness and limited resources, have
intensified anti-migrant attitudes, with foreigners
frequently being blamed for these difficulties
(Arndt, 2018). The instances of violence in 2008
and 2015, which led to the loss of lives and forced
migration of foreigners, serve as clear examples of
this pattern (Everatt, 2011).
Xenophobia in Africa is influenced by several
elements, such as cultural aspects associated with
identity and nationality, the frequency of
interactions with unfamiliar individuals, and
material and economic considerations, including
job prospects and resource availability (Coetzee,
2012; Klotz, 2016; Pillay, 2017). The South African
Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR) posits that the
crisis is a result of government policy failures that
have worsened lawlessness, poverty, and unmet
expectations, leading to violence (Pringle, 1973).
The enduring impact of apartheid continues to
influence the matter. The rigid social hierarchies
and enforcement of personal identity during the
apartheid era have only been chiefly transferred to
foreigners in the period following apartheid
(Hlatshwayo, 2011; Mabera, 2017). Xenophobia
serves to reaffirm one's sense of belonging and to
show dissatisfaction with the unfulfilled pledges of
democracy (Harris, 2002).
The reaction of other African nations to xenophobic
acts occurring within the continent, namely in
South Africa, has raised concerns. Frequently,
adjacent nations assume a position of hesitancy
and
passivity,
anticipating
the
national
government to address the matter (Ojedokun,
2015). The absence of regional collaboration and
unity underscores a notable obstacle in tackling
xenophobia throughout Africa.
Theoretical Framework
Social Identity Theory (SIT)
Social Identity Theory (SIT), developed by Henri
Tajfel and John Turner throughout the 1970s and
1980s, is a well-known psychological paradigm
that helps us comprehend intergroup relations and
the development of social identities. SIT proposes
that individuals classify themselves and others into
social groups based on common attributes, such as
nationality, ethnicity, or religion. These social
identities enhance one's self-esteem and foster a
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
21
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
feeling of inclusion.
Within the framework of xenophobia, SIT proposes
that individuals may exhibit a preference for their
social group (such as their fellow citizens) and
engage in discriminatory behavior toward other
social groups (such as immigrants) to boost their
self-esteem and strengthen their sense of social
identity. This can be observed as expressing
unfavorable attitudes, preconceived notions, and
prejudiced actions directed against individuals
from other countries.
This paper alludes to SIT when examining the
influence of identity and belonging on xenophobia.
The study highlights the ongoing impact of
apartheid in South Africa, specifically its focus on
racial classification and separation, which still
influences people's sense of identity and belonging.
This influence may also contribute to developing
xenophobic sentiments (Hlatshwayo, 2011). This
paper also emphasizes the connection between
xenophobia and the need to reinforce national
identity in times of crisis, consistent with SIT's
focus on the significance of social identity for
individuals' self-concept (Klotz, 2016; Pillay,
2017).
Additionally, other researchers have utilized the
Social Identity Theory (SIT) to gain insights into
xenophobia in Africa. Tsheola, Ramoroka, and
Muzondi (2015) conducted a study investigating
the correlation between xenophobic societal
sentiments in South Africa and the formation of a
"new" South Africanism, which defines national
identity in contrast to immigrants. Adeola (2020)
investigated the effects of xenophobia on the
identities of groups and cultures, resulting in the
isolation and marginalization of individuals viewed
as outsiders.
The Social Identity Theory offers a significant
framework for comprehending the psychological
and social variables contributing to African
xenophobia. By acknowledging the influence of
social identity on attitudes and behaviors towards
foreigners, academics and policymakers can devise
more efficient measures to tackle and alleviate
xenophobia.
Empirical Review
Xenophobia in African nations is evident through
multiple channels, such as political discourse,
denialism, the lingering effects of colonialism, and
economic challenges. Political leaders and
government officials in nations such as South
Africa, Nigeria, Libya, and Kenya have exacerbated
tensions between residents and immigrant
nationals by perpetuating xenophobia through
hypocritical comments and denying its existence.
Mavhungu, Abel, and Mafukata. 2021. Keatlegile,
M., Mabena. (2021). The tumultuous colonial past
of Africa has resulted in the militarization of
society, resulting in the marginalization of those
who are seen as 'different' or 'other,' and the
occurrence of xenophobic violence, which has
impeded attempts towards peace and development
throughout the continent. Adeoye, O., Akinola.
(2018), Ebenezer, et al., (2018). Economic crises,
such as the oil price crash in Nigeria and apartheid
in South Africa, have exacerbated xenophobic
views. This has had a negative influence on political
and economic development goals and has
weakened pan-African connections. Oladotun et al.
(2019).
In his study, Akinola (2023) investigated the
media's contribution to increasing xenophobia in
West Africa. He concluded that although the media
does have a role, the underlying causes are
primarily attributed to inadequate governance,
political manipulation, and the exclusion of West
African residents from the ECOWAS integration
process. This is consistent with the views of other
researchers, such as Tella (2017) and Mthombeni
(2022), who highlight the importance of political
and social variables in promoting xenophobic
attitudes. Akinola's research has a unique focus on
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
22
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
the West African region and the influence of media.
This regional viewpoint adds to the broader
analysis of xenophobia in Africa.
Akinola's research on xenophobia in Africa has a
lacuna in that it does not extensively investigate
historical and cultural issues. The study
acknowledges the influence of colonialism and
historical legacies on xenophobia but does not
thoroughly explore how these variables link with
current political and economic challenges
(Neocosmos, 2022). Furthermore, the study would
be enhanced by a more detailed investigation of the
media's influence, specifically investigating how
various media platforms and narratives contribute
to developing xenophobic attitudes and actions
(Banda, 2021).
In addition, Akinola's research concentrates on the
ECOWAS region, resulting in a lack of
comprehension of the occurrences and factors
contributing to xenophobia in other regions of
Africa. Examining xenophobic patterns and their
underlying reasons in many places could provide
valuable insights into this intricate subject,
enhancing our overall comprehension. The
dynamics of xenophobia in North Africa,
characterized by its distinct political and
socioeconomic environment, may exhibit notable
variations compared to those observed in Southern
Africa (Kollapan, 2020).
Akinola's research offers valuable insights into the
media's contribution to the escalation of
xenophobia in West Africa and identifies
prospective areas for future research. To achieve a
more comprehensive knowledge of xenophobia in
Africa, it is necessary to delve deeper into historical
and cultural causes, conduct a more nuanced
examination of media influence, and adopt a
comparative approach encompassing many
locations across the continent.
Examining the historical, social, economic, and
political factors contributing to African
xenophobia
Social variables are essential in influencing
xenophobic attitudes and behaviors in Africa. The
use of political discourse by elites and government
officials has traditionally contributed to the
emergence of xenophobic feelings among local
populations, as evidenced in several African
countries
(Adepoju,
2021).
Manipulating
xenophobia for political advantage frequently
obstructs attempts to tackle the underlying roots of
the problem and promotes an atmosphere of
intolerance.
Education has been unexpectedly recognized as an
element that contributes to xenophobia in some
situations. A study conducted in Botswana
discovered that those who had completed primary
and secondary education were more prone to
displaying xenophobic sentiments than those who
had completed tertiary education (Mberu &
Bernard, 2023). This discovery implies that
educational interventions focused on levels of
education may be required to tackle xenophobic
prejudices.
Xenophobia in Africa has been associated with
globalization
and
economic
inequality.
Globalization has resulted in interconnection and
economic opportunity, although it has primarily
favoured developed economies (Monson & Abdul-
Raheem, 2021). African migrants frequently
encounter animosity and assaults within the
continent because they are viewed as rivals for
limited resources and opportunities, therefore
establishing
a
challenging
environment
(Neocosmos, 2022).
Xenophobia in Africa is significantly influenced by
social stratification, which has its origins in
historical events and colonial influences.
Postcolonial theory in South Africa exposes the
connection between anti-immigrant emotions,
which are frequently entangled with racial and
ethnic biases, and the deadly consequences
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
23
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
experienced by foreign nationals (Crush &
Ramachandran, 2022). This highlights the
significance of comprehending the intricate
interaction of social elements in influencing
xenophobic attitudes and behaviors.
Sempijja
(2022)
asserts
a
comparative
examination of xenophobia in urban environments,
specifically examining the 1972 expulsion of
Ugandan Asians and the xenophobic incidents that
occurred in South Africa between 2008 and 2019.
The analysis demonstrates that although issues
such as income disparity, inter-group tensions, and
competition for resources played a role, the
underlying cause in both cases was a profound and
long-standing desire for social justice rooted in
historical socio-economic grievances. The study
utilized a qualitative approach, analyzing case
studies and current literature to get insight into the
intricacies of these occurrences. Sempijja contends
that xenophobia not only fails to address social
injustice but also worsens it by generating
additional victims and diverting attention away
from the government's failure to address poverty,
inequality, and restricted economic possibilities.
Sempijja's research offers exciting perspectives on
the social justice aspects of xenophobia. However,
it concentrates on two cases in Uganda and South
Africa, which restricts its applicability to the
broader African setting. Moreover, although it
recognizes the significance of past resentments, it
might further explore how they manifest as
present-day acts of violence. Moreover, doing a
more thorough investigation into the involvement
of political elites in promoting and capitalizing on
xenophobia for their interests could enhance the
analysis.
Although there are limits, Sempijja's findings are
consistent with the more comprehensive academic
discussion on how socio-economic conditions and
historical grievances contribute to the emergence
of xenophobia (Adepoju, 2021; Tella, 2017;
Mthombeni, 2022). The study's focus on
community dialogue and inter-community linkages
as viable solutions aligns with prior literature
highlighting the significance of grassroots actions
in
addressing
social
issues
(Crush
&
Ramachandran, 2022).
Sempijja's research enhances our comprehension
of the intricate dynamics of xenophobia,
specifically in metropolitan areas and to historical
grievances. Nevertheless, the narrow scope of its
examination and the incomplete investigation of
facets create an opportunity for additional
research to offer a more all-encompassing
understanding of xenophobia throughout the
African continent.
Manifestations Of Xenophobia
Over time, xenophobia evolved because of a
complicated interaction between innate and
environmental factors. While some researchers
speculate that xenophobia may have a genetic
component, others highlight the critical role that
environmental factors play, such as exposure to
infectious disease threats and political rhetoric that
feeds mistrust and fear of outsiders (Fincher &
Thornhill, 2021; Abrams & Hogg, 2022).
Xenophobic sentiments have been more prevalent
in the wake of international tragedies such as the
September 11 attacks and the COVID-19 epidemic,
primarily directed towards Muslim and Asian
American communities (Perry et al., 2020; Lee &
Zhou, 2022).
Islamophobia, as a unique form of bias, has added a
new layer to the complex landscape of exclusion.
Unlike xenophobia, which is often used as a general
term, Islamophobia targets explicitly individuals
based on their religious beliefs rather than their
nationality or ethnicity (Kumar, 2023). This
distinction underscores the unique evolution of
xenophobia and underscores the need for targeted
interventions to address its various manifestations.
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
24
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Because xenophobia is dynamic and ever-changing,
it requires constant study and action to identify its
underlying roots and lessen its negative
consequences on society. By examining biological,
psychological, social, and political interactions,
researchers can create more potent plans to
counteract xenophobia and advance inclusivity
(Stephan et al., 2023).
Kaplan's 2020 study, titled "The Rise in Anti-Asian
Racism and Xenophobia in the Time of COVID-19,"
examined the increasing levels of anti-Asian racism
and xenophobia in the United States amid the
epidemic. He found that the key drivers of this
growth are socioeconomic reasons, such as
economic uncertainty and competition, and
psychological variables, like fear and scapegoating.
In addition, Kaplan emphasized the significance of
misinformation
and
detrimental
speech
disseminated via social media and political forums
in exacerbating these prejudiced beliefs. The
researcher's approach consisted of thoroughly
examining the literature and analyzing pre-existing
data regarding past and present societal reactions
to epidemics. This includes investigating
sociocultural patterns, psychological processes,
and the influence of political communication on
public attitudes and actions. Kaplan asserts that
effectively addressing COVID-19-related racism
and xenophobia necessitates a comprehensive
strategy that encompasses legislative actions and
grassroots initiatives aimed at tackling hate crimes,
discrimination, and misinformation.
Although Kaplan's research provides vital insights
into the situation in the United States, it fails to
address the worldwide consequences of
xenophobia associated with COVID-19. This study
has the potential to be extended to investigate the
impact of comparable factors (such as
socioeconomic disparities, political discourse, and
dissemination of false information) on xenophobic
beliefs and behaviours in Africa. Moreover,
Kaplan's emphasis on Asian Americans might be
expanded to investigate the effects of the epidemic
on
xenophobia
against
other
oppressed
populations in various geographical areas.
Kaplan's research supports the conclusions of
other academic studies that highlight the influence
of social and political elements in fueling
xenophobia (Abrams & Hogg, 2022; Perry et al.,
2020). His focus on the influence of false
information is also consistent with studies on the
correlation between media narratives and
prejudiced beliefs (Lee & Zhou, 2022). Additional
research is required to investigate the distinct
historical and cultural factors that influence
xenophobia in Africa, utilizing the studies
conducted by researchers such as Adepoju (2021)
and Monson and Abdul-Raheem (2021).
Areas for future investigation involve conducting
comparative analyses between the United States
and African nations to elucidate commonalities and
disparities in the factors and expressions of
xenophobia associated with COVID-19. An analysis
of the impact of the pandemic on xenophobia
against certain groups in Africa, such as refugees,
internal migrants, and ethnic minorities, could
offer a more detailed comprehension of the issue.
Furthermore, analyzing the influence of both
conventional and digital media on the development
of xenophobic narratives in Africa could provide
valuable insights for devising effective measures to
counteract such messages.
The complicated subject of xenophobia in Africa is
influenced by an intricate combination of
historical, social, economic, and political variables,
which requires nuanced comprehension. The
continent has been deeply affected by the lasting
impacts of colonialism and apartheid, which have
influenced how people perceive their own identity,
sense of belonging, and their views towards those
who are different from them (Mamdani, 2020). The
historical injustices have resulted in persistent
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
25
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
inequalities and divisions, which continue to
contribute to xenophobic sentiments. This is
especially evident in countries such as South Africa,
where the transition to democracy has not entirely
resolved the socioeconomic disparities that form
the basis of xenophobic attitudes (Neocosmos,
2022).
Economic issues, such as limited resources and
competition for employment opportunities,
worsen xenophobic tensions. Within numerous
African nations, the combination of restricted
economic prospects and elevated rates of
unemployment fosters an environment conducive
to animosity and antagonism towards immigrants.
These individuals are frequently viewed as rivals in
the competition for limited resources (Crush &
Ramachandran, 2022). This phenomenon is
especially noticeable in metropolitan regions,
where the arrival of migrants can put additional
pressure on already scarce resources and
infrastructure, resulting in social tensions and
conflicts (Sempijja, 2022).
Political instability and inadequate governance
significantly influence xenophobia. Political
leaders in numerous African nations have
manipulated xenophobic emotions to further their
interests, employing divisive language to rally
support and divert attention from their
shortcomings
(Cheeseman,
2023).
The
manipulation of ethnic and national identities can
engender an atmosphere of apprehension and
distrust, resulting in acts of violence and prejudice
against marginalized communities and non-natives
(Monson & Abdul-Raheem, 2021).
The media has a significant role in influencing
public opinion and shaping the attitudes of
foreigners, and its impact should not be ignored.
Media sources have faced accusations of
magnifying xenophobic narratives, perpetuating
stereotypes, and fostering an atmosphere of fear
and animosity (Banda, 2021). Nevertheless, the
media can also have a beneficial impact in
addressing xenophobia by advocating for
intercultural
communication,
questioning
preconceived notions, and emphasizing the
valuable contributions made by immigrants to
society.
Xenophobia in Africa encompasses a wide array of
manifestations, spanning from subtle instances of
prejudice to explicit acts of violence. Xenophobic
violence in South Africa has led to a considerable
number of fatalities, injuries, and forced migration
of foreign nationals (Mthombeni, 2022).
Xenophobia can be observed in other nations
through
instances
of
discrimination
in
employment, housing, and access to social services.
The Erosion of African Ethics Caused by
Xenophobia and Its Implications for Humanity.
The social fabric of traditional African cultures was
built upon a collective moral code that emphasized
compassion, friendliness, and a genuine regard for
others (Gyekye, 1997). The communal ethos,
frequently upheld in traditional faiths and
proverbs, placed immense importance on qualities
such as respect, charity, and forgiveness while
strongly disapproving of vices such as abuse, lying,
and selfishness (Gelfand, 1999). Nevertheless, the
increase in xenophobic violence throughout the
continent contradicts these deeply valued
principles, presenting significant consequences for
the people of Africa.
The advent of modernity and its associated societal
changes have undermined conventional moral
frameworks, resulting in a conflict between
traditional and contemporary ideals (Letseka,
2013). The collision has resulted in the gradual
disappearance of the "live and let live" ethos
previously prevalent in African communities,
where collective welfare took precedence over
personal interests (Bush, 2018). Xenophobia,
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
26
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
characterized by its inherent prejudice and
aggression, has not only caused divisions within
groups but also sparked retaliatory assaults and
damaged diplomatic relations between states
(Mkhize, 2019).
The xenophobic attacks in South Africa, for
example, elicited robust responses from
neighboring African nations. Zambia cancelled a
friendly football match and experienced
demonstrations against South African firms
(Mkhize, 2019). Nigeria's reaction was notably
harsh, as the government opted to disengage from
the World Economic Forum on Africa and boycott
South African goods and services (Durokifa &
Ijeoma, 2017). These examples highlight the
extensive repercussions of xenophobia, which go
beyond isolated acts of violence and impact
diplomatic relations and commercial operations.
Furthermore, xenophobia carries substantial
economic consequences. The xenophobic attacks
resulted in the damage and closure of enterprises
held by foreigners, which in turn caused job losses
and a rise in unemployment rates (UNHCR, 2024).
The departure of foreign nationals concerned
about their safety worsens the economic
difficulties in the impacted regions.
Xenophobia constitutes not just a moral and
economic crisis but also a crime against humanity.
Crimes against humanity, as defined by
international law, refer to extensive and organized
acts of violence targeting civilian populations
(Schabas, 2020). Xenophobic violence, which
frequently targets marginalized populations such
as migrants and refugees, aligns with this
description, emphasizing the necessity for a unified
global effort to tackle this urgent matter.
The destructive consequences of xenophobia on
the African population necessitate immediate and
collective efforts. Reaffirming the continent's
ancient ideals of compassion and togetherness is
crucial while also tackling the underlying factors
that contribute to xenophobia, including economic
injustice, political manipulation, and social
isolation.
METHODOLOGY
The study utilized a historical research technique
to investigate the occurrence of xenophobia in
South Africa. This methodology involved
thoroughly examining and interpreting data to
establish objective information and make informed
judgments about the studied subject (Berg & Lune,
2022). The primary data source utilized in this
study was the Xenowatch dashboard, an internet-
based platform that offers extensive information
regarding xenophobic occurrences in South Africa.
Xenowatch collects information from various
sources, including media stories, academic papers,
partner organizations, and public reports received
through different methods like WhatsApp, phone
calls, and emails (Xenowatch, 2023).
Xenowatch anonymizes the data it collects before
publishing it. The data covers many features of
xenophobic occurrences, such as the type of
incident, information about the victims, the date of
occurrence, and other essential characteristics.
This information aims to provide early warning
systems, assist in risk assessments, and aid in
implementing evidence-based interventions to
address xenophobic discrimination (Xenowatch,
2023).
Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognize the
constraints of the Xenowatch data, namely the
tendency to report less frequently and the presence
of partial information. Xenophobic incidents
frequently go unreported as victims and witnesses
are typically deterred by the fear of retaliation and
a lack of confidence in the authorities (Xenowatch,
2023). To address these problems, Xenowatch
utilizes research assistants and engages with
verification partners to guarantee comprehensive
and precise data collecting (Xenowatch, 2023).
Although there are certain limits, the data supplied
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
27
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
by Xenowatch provides valuable insights into the
nature and scope of xenophobia in South Africa.
This contributes to the creation of practical
solutions to address this urgent issue.
RESULTS
Table 1.1
Xenophobic Discrimination Incidents in South Africa (1994-2024)
Province
Total Incidents Frequency Percentage
Gauteng
417
417
38.30%
Kwazulu Natal
191
191
17.50%
Western Cape
187
187
17.20%
Eastern Cape
107
107
9.80%
Limpopo
56
56
5.10%
Mpumalanga
41
41
3.80%
Free State
33
33
3.00%
Northwest
30
30
2.80%
Northern Cape
20
20
1.80%
Unallocated
0
0
0.00%
Total
1,089
1,089
100.00%
Fig. 1.
Source:
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
28
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
The Xenowatch dashboard, an exhaustive
repository of data on xenophobic discrimination in
South Africa that spans three decades, presents a
stark and urgent image. The prevalence of
xenophobia is undeniable, casting a lengthy and
ominous shadow over the nation, as evidenced by
the 1,089 recorded incidents since 1994. The
consequences of these occurrences are nothing
short of catastrophic, resulting in the displacement
of a staggering 128,134 individuals from their
residences, the looting of 5,322 shops, and the
tragic loss of 673 lives. These figures expose the
profound human suffering that xenophobia inflicts,
which shatters families, disrupts communities, and
extinguishes countless aspirations.
The data indicates a concerning pattern of
fluctuating incidents and fatalities, which
underscores the persistent and insidious nature of
xenophobia in South Africa. Although some years
may experience a decrease, the recurring surges
serve as a chilling reminder that the underlying
tensions remain unresolved and necessitate
ongoing vigilance and intervention. The
vulnerability of urban areas and regions with high
levels of migration and economic activity to
xenophobic outbreaks is further evidenced by the
geographical distribution of these incidents, which
is concentrated in Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, and
Western Cape provinces.
Although the Xenowatch dashboard offers a
valuable perspective on the severity of the issue, it
is imperative to recognize that the actual number
of incidents likely exceeds the recorded figures due
to underreporting. The true extent of this societal
scourge is frequently obscured by fear, distrust,
and systemic barriers that prevent victims and
witnesses from coming forward. This sobering
reality underscores the urgent need for exhaustive
and precise data collection to understand the
problem and develop effective solutions
comprehensively. It is important to note that the
Xenowatch dashboard, while comprehensive, may
not capture all incidents due to these factors, and
therefore, the actual numbers could be higher.
Table 1.2 The Human Cost of Xenophobia in South Africa: A Distribution of Incident Outcomes
(1994-2024)
Parameter
Frequency Percentage (%)
Displacements
128,134
98.70%
Shops Looted
5,322
4.10%
Deaths
673
0.50%
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
29
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Fig. 1.2
From the above chart, the national economy and
the lives of individuals are both profoundly
affected by the catastrophic consequences of
xenophobia in South Africa. The stark picture of a
humanitarian crisis is painted by the staggering
figure of 128,134 individuals displaced due to
xenophobic violence, which has resulted in the
uprooting of innumerable lives, the destruction of
livelihoods, and the fragmentation of communities.
Xenophobic prejudice's brutality and far-reaching
consequences are further emphasized by the tragic
loss of 673 lives, which has left an enduring
impression on the nation's conscience.
The economic consequences of xenophobia are
equally significant, in addition to the human toll.
The economic fabric of local communities has been
severely impacted by the looting and destruction of
5,322 shops, with a particular emphasis on small
businesses and informal businesses that frequently
operate with inadequate resources and support. In
addition to jeopardizing the livelihoods of
numerous individuals, this devastation also
undermines economic stability, thereby impeding
the development of inclusive and prosperous
communities.
The
urgent
necessity
for
comprehensive interventions that address both the
humanitarian crisis and the underlying causes of
xenophobic violence in South Africa is underscored
by the combined impact of displacement, loss of
life, and economic harm.
Table 1.3 Xenophobic Incidents by Province
Province
Total Incidents
Frequency Percentage
Gauteng
410
410
38.10%
KwaZulu Natal
190
190
17.60%
Western Cape
180
180
16.70%
Eastern Cape
110
110
10.20%
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
30
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Limpopo
50
50
4.60%
Mpumalanga
40
40
3.70%
Free State
40
40
3.70%
Northwest
30
30
2.80%
Northern Cape
20
20
1.90%
Total
1,070
1,070
100.00%
Fig. 1.3
Severity Across Provinces
A review of xenophobic incidents in South Africa
demonstrates a concerning concentration of
discrimination and violence, particularly in urban
areas, as presented above. According to the
Xenowatch Dashboard data from 1994 to July
2024, Gauteng, the economic centre, has the
highest number of incidents, with 417. KwaZulu-
Natal and the Western Cape follow, with 191 and
187 incidents, respectively. The vulnerability of
these three provinces to xenophobic tensions is
underscored by the fact that they account for
74.8% of the total 1,070 incidents recorded.
Although the remaining provinces experience
fewer incidents, they still contribute to the
aggregate national figure, suggesting that the issue
is pervasive and not limited to specific regions.
It is particularly concerning that the concentration
of incidents in Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, and the
Western Cape is particularly alarming, as it implies
that xenophobic violence is more prevalent in
regions with a higher immigrant population and
increased competition for jobs and resources. This
emphasizes Gauteng as a significant locus for
xenophobic
activity,
requiring
targeted
intervention and monitoring.
This disproportionate distribution is starkly
underscored by the bar graph representation,
which features towering bars for these provinces
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
31
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
that dwarf others. This visual representation
further emphasizes the urgency of addressing the
fundamental causes of xenophobia in these
regions.
Although the data provides significant insights, it is
imperative to recognize its constraints. The
analysis is primarily concerned with the number of
incidents rather than the nature or severity of each
case.
Table 1.4 Patterns and Trends
Year
Total
Incidents
% of Total
Total Deaths
% of Total
1994
1
0.10%
0
0.00%
1995
5
0.50%
1
0.40%
1996
15
1.40%
1
0.40%
1997
8
0.70%
2
0.80%
1998
5
0.50%
3
1.20%
1999
1
0.10%
1
0.40%
2000
30
2.80%
2
0.80%
2001
28
2.60%
3
1.20%
2002
19
1.80%
4
1.60%
2003
85
7.80%
10
4.00%
2004
88
8.10%
11
4.40%
2005
70
6.50%
18
7.20%
2006
116
10.70%
24
9.60%
2007
109
10.00%
21
8.40%
2008
101
9.30%
22
8.80%
2009
79
7.30%
22
8.80%
2010
75
6.90%
20
8.00%
2011
91
8.40%
25
10.00%
2012
94
8.70%
22
8.80%
2013
80
7.40%
21
8.40%
2014
85
7.80%
22
8.80%
2015
91
8.40%
22
8.80%
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
32
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
2016
90
8.30%
24
9.60%
2017
95
8.80%
20
8.00%
2018
102
9.40%
25
10.00%
2019
117
10.80%
26
10.40%
2020
91
8.40%
19
7.60%
2021
120
11.10%
20
8.00%
2022
112
10.30%
22
8.80%
2023
100
9.20%
18
7.20%
2024
118
10.90%
25
10.00%
Fig 1.4
The data from the Xenowatch Dashboard and the
chart above, spanning from 1994 to July 2024,
present a clear and alarming depiction of
xenophobic violence in South Africa. There has
been a consistent increase in events over the past
three decades, with a significant rise beginning in
the late 1990s, reaching its highest point in the
mid-2000s and late 2010s. Nevertheless, the
pattern is inconsistent since socio-political events
and economic changes presumably impact
significant swings. Alarmingly, the fatalities arising
from these instances typically correspond to the
frequency of attacks. Although there has been a
minor decrease in deaths in 2020-2024, the
frequency of occurrences remains high. This
indicates that there may have been a shift in the
type of attacks or an enhancement in emergency
response. This report highlights the enduring and
lethal presence of xenophobia in South Africa,
emphasizing the need for ongoing alertness and
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
33
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
comprehensive measures to tackle its underlying
factors and alleviate its catastrophic outcomes. It is
crucial to maintain this alertness to prevent future
outbreaks of xenophobic violence.
The data from the Xenowatch Dashboard offers a
comprehensive perspective on xenophobia in
South Africa, demonstrating its impacts, patterns,
and extent. Quantifying incidents and analyzing
them provides valuable insights into the
manifestation and impact of xenophobia on
communities. These results emphasize the
necessity of targeted policy interventions and
initiatives to foster economic inclusion, social
cohesion, and cultural comprehension to reduce
xenophobic violence.
DISCUSSION ON THE FINDINGS
The study examines the intricate characteristics of
xenophobia in Africa, emphasizing its historical
origins, socio-political aspects, and effects on
individuals, societies, and nations. The purpose of
this analysis is to utilize the data from the
Xenowatch dashboard to gain a deeper
understanding of the frequency and impact of
xenophobic discrimination in South Africa, with a
specific focus on urban regions such as Gauteng,
KwaZulu-Natal, and the Western Cape. The study
establishes a correlation between xenophobia and
characteristics such as densely populated areas,
economic inequalities, and resource rivalry
(Zaman, 2020).
Historical analysis demonstrates that xenophobia
in Africa is not a recent occurrence but rather a
result of colonialism and apartheid. There are still
differences and unfairness in society because of
these historical events (Tewolde, 2023)
—
the post-
colonial period created new kinds of prejudice
based on national identity and citizenship, showing
how complex the relationship is between historical
factors and current social and political factors in
creating xenophobic attitudes (Masikane et al.,
2020).
The study sheds light on the different
manifestations of xenophobia, spanning from
subtle biases to explicit acts of violence. It
particularly emphasizes the economic dimension.
In this context, immigrants and refugees are
frequently held responsible for economic
difficulties and the scarcity of work opportunities.
This economic scapegoating is a significant driver
of xenophobic attitudes and behaviors (Yingi,
2023). Political discourse and media stories that
portray outsiders as endangering the financial
prosperity of local communities frequently
intensify the act of blaming others (Tella, 2016).
Moreover, xenophobia has substantial social
consequences, including violence, relocation, and
loss of life. Additionally, it weakens social cohesion,
trust, and collaboration among communities,
destroying traditional African ideals of hospitality
and communalism (Mutereko, 2024). The study
also emphasizes the international aspects of
xenophobia. This includes analyzing how
surrounding nations react to xenophobic
occurrences in South Africa and the potential
consequences of this issue at both the regional and
continental levels. For instance, xenophobic
incidents in South Africa can strain diplomatic
relations with other African countries, affecting
regional stability (Jaiswal, 2024).
Social identity theory (SIT) is a theoretical
framework that helps us understand the
psychological basis of xenophobia. It explains that
individuals derive their self-esteem from belonging
to a particular group and may display prejudice
against groups they perceive as threatening their
identity and social unity (Mgogo & Osunkunle,
2023). Examining current scholarly works
highlights the need for additional investigation into
the efficacy of interventions and policies in
addressing xenophobia. It recommends conducting
comparative studies across African countries and
exploring how xenophobia intersects with other
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
34
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
types of discrimination (Raborife, 2024).
The research emphasizes tackling xenophobia in
Africa by adopting a comprehensive strategy. This
strategy incorporates legal, political, economic, and
social measures to protect immigrants' rights,
foster inclusivity, counter xenophobic narratives,
and promote intercultural understanding. The
ultimate objective is cultivating harmonious and
prosperous societies that benefit everyone
(Mlambo & Mlambo, 2021). This comprehensive
approach is crucial in addressing the multifaceted
nature of xenophobia and its deep-seated roots in
society.
CONCLUSION
The Xenowatch data and the lens of Social Identity
Theory illuminate the pervasive and destructive
nature of xenophobia in South Africa. The
staggering figures of displacement, loss of life, and
economic damage underscore the urgent need to
address this issue. The concentration of incidents
in urban centers aligns with Mubangizi's (2021)
findings, highlighting the link between xenophobia
and factors like population density and economic
inequality. The historical analysis reveals that
xenophobia is deeply rooted in the legacies of
colonialism and apartheid (Mamdani, 2020), with
contemporary socio-political dynamics further
fueling discriminatory attitudes and behaviors
(Neocosmos, 2022). The scapegoating of
immigrants for economic problems, which Crush
and Ramachandran (2022) documented, as well as
the role of political rhetoric and media narratives
in amplifying these sentiments (Akinola, 2023),
further highlight the complex interplay of factors
contributing to xenophobia.
The far-reaching social impact of xenophobia,
eroding trust and social cohesion (Monson &
Abdul-Raheem, 2021), and the erosion of
traditional values of hospitality (Bassey & Bubu,
2019) highlight the need for multifaceted
interventions. The transnational dimension of
xenophobia, evidenced by reactions from
neighboring countries (Mkhize, 2019), emphasizes
the need for regional cooperation. This study's
findings align with SIT, demonstrating how group
identities can lead to bias and discrimination
against perceived outsiders (Tajfel & Turner,
1979). Addressing xenophobia necessitates a
comprehensive approach encompassing legal
reforms, economic empowerment, education,
community engagement, and regional cooperation.
By dismantling the structural, economic, and social
factors perpetuating xenophobia and fostering
intercultural understanding and inclusivity, we can
pave the way for a more equitable and harmonious
society for all.
This study contributes to the current corpus of
literature on xenophobia in Africa by offering a
comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon. It
incorporates quantitative data from the Xenowatch
dashboard and qualitative insights from historical
and social contexts. It emphasizes the multifaceted
nature of xenophobia, which encompasses
historical legacies, socio-political dynamics,
economic factors, and social consequences.
Furthermore, it emphasizes the necessity of
employing a multifaceted strategy to resolve this
intricate matter, particularly on legal reforms,
economic empowerment, education, community
engagement, and regional cooperation. This study
provides a nuanced understanding of xenophobia
in Africa and actionable recommendations for
policymakers, practitioners, and researchers
engaged in the fight against this pervasive issue by
synthesizing various perspectives and data
sources.
RECOMMENDATION
Considering the study's findings, Social Identity
Theory, and the broader literature on xenophobia
in Africa, a multi-pronged approach is crucial to
combating this issue.
Legal and policy reforms should focus on
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
35
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
strengthening protections for immigrants and
refugees, enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and
developing comprehensive immigration policies
that address the root causes of displacement.
Economic empowerment and inclusion initiatives
are essential. They foster dialogue between
communities, address unemployment and poverty,
and support entrepreneurship among both local
and immigrant populations.
Education and awareness-raising campaigns
should be implemented at all levels, promoting
intercultural
understanding,
challenging
stereotypes, and utilizing various media channels
to disseminate accurate information about
immigrants and refugees. The study highlights the
transformative power of education in combating
xenophobia, making the audience feel the potential
for positive change.
Community engagement and dialogue are vital to
fostering social cohesion and addressing
xenophobic attitudes at the grassroots level. This
can be achieved through community-based
initiatives, cultural events, interfaith dialogues, and
stakeholder collaboration platforms.
Finally, regional and continental cooperation is
necessary to address xenophobia's transnational
nature. This involves strengthening cooperation
mechanisms, developing regional frameworks for
migrant and refugee protection, and supporting
initiatives that promote peace, security, and
economic integration. The study underscores the
importance of collective action in addressing
xenophobia, making the audience feel the need for
regional cooperation.
African nations can forge a path towards more
inclusive and equitable societies by implementing
these recommendations, grounded in social justice,
human rights, and intercultural understanding.
These measures will mitigate the immediate harms
of xenophobia and contribute to long-term
sustainable development and social cohesion
across the continent.
REFERENCES
1.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2022). Xenophobia,
fear of disease, and social attitudes. Current
Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, p. 43, 101117.
2.
Acemoğlu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2004).
Institutions are the fundamental cause of long-
run growth. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10481
3.
Adeola, R. (2020). Xenophobia and internal
displacement in Africa: defining protection and
assistance through the Kampala convention.
South African Journal of International Affairs,
27(4),
493
–
510.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2020.187
4502
4.
Adeoye, O., Akinola. (2018). Introduction:
Understanding Xenophobia in Africa. Doi:
10.1007/978-3-319-64897-2_1
5.
Adeoye, O., Akinola. (2020). Xenophobia, the
Media, and the West African Integration
Agenda. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61236-8_7
6.
Adepoju, A. (2008). Migration in West Africa: A
Paper Prepared for the Policy Analysis and
Research
Programme
of
the
Global
Commission on International Migration. Global
Commission on International Migration.
7.
Adepoju, A. (2021). The Politics of Migration in
Africa. Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
Akinola, A. A. (2023). Media, migration, and
xenophobia in West Africa. In Xenophobia in
West Africa (pp. 85-103). Palgrave Macmillan,
Cham.
9.
Alexander, C. (2010). The complex dynamics of
xenophobia in South Africa: perspectives from
different disciplines. Journal of Social Sciences,
24(1), 1-12.
10.
Arndt, M. (2018). Xenophobia and the origins of
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
36
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
the 2015 attacks on foreigners in South Africa.
Journal of Southern African Studies, 44(1), 95
–
117.
11.
Arndt, M. (2018). Xenophobic violence in South
Africa: The role of the media. African Affairs,
117(467), 267
–
289.
12.
Banda, F. (2021). The role of the media in
fuelling xenophobia in South Africa. African
Journalism Studies, 42(4), 1
–
20.
13.
Bassey, S. W., & Bubu, J. (2019). African
communitarianism and the ethics of
xenophobia. Journal of African Philosophy,
18(1), 55
–
70.
14.
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2022). Qualitative
research methods for the social sciences (9th
ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
15.
Besley, T. and Reynal‐Querol, M. (2014). The
legacy of historical conflict: evidence from
Africa. American Political Science Review,
108(2),
319-336.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305541400016
1
16.
Bush, B. (2018). The roots of xenophobia in
South Africa: A socio-economic perspective.
Journal of Contemporary African Studies,
36(2), 165
–
182.
17.
Carter,
E.
(2018).
Right-wing
extremism/radicalism: reconstructing the
concept. Journal of Political Ideologies, 23(2),
157
–
182.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2018.145
1227
18.
Castillo Soto, M. A. (2024). Challenging
European identity: representations of female
transnational experiences in marrón by rocío
quillahuaman. Journal of Advanced Research in
Women’s
Studies
,
2(1),
38-55.
https://doi.org/10.33422/jarws.v2i1.662
19.
Cheeseman, N. (2023). The Moral Case for
Democracy in Africa. Cambridge University
Press.
20.
Coetzee, E. (2012). Xenophobia in South Africa:
A psychological perspective. South African
Journal of Psychology, 42(3), 342
–
354.
21.
Crush, J. (2022). Xenophobia denialism and the
global compact for migration in South Africa.,
133
–
158.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004522770_00
7
22.
Crush, J., & Ramachandran, S. (2022).
Xenophobia in South Africa. HSRC Press.
23.
Diaz, J. (2023). Evaluating rural health
disparities in Colombia: Identifying barriers
and strategies to advancing refugee health.
International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 20(20), 6948.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20206948
24.
Dick, A. (2005). Xenophobia: The history of an
idea. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(2), 205
–
228.
25.
Ebenezer, Oluwole, Oni., Samuel, Kehinde,
Okunade. (2018). The Context of Xenophobia in
Africa: Nigeria and South Africa in Comparison.
Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64897-2_4
26.
Everatt, D. (2011). The Politics of Non-
racialism: White Responses to the Xenophobic
Violence in South Africa. Agenda, 25(3), 10
–
21.
27.
Fenske, J. (2009). Does land abundance explain
African institutions? SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1504879
28.
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2021). Parasite-
stress theory and xenophobia: The case of the
disgusting migrant. Evolutionary Behavioral
Sciences, 15(4), 313.
29.
Fredrickson, G. M. (2002). Racism: A Short
History. Princeton University Press.
30.
Freier, L. and Pérez, L. (2021). Nationality-
based
criminalization
of
south-south
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
37
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
migration: the experience of Venezuelan
displaced people in Peru. European Journal on
Criminal Policy and Research, 27(1), 113-133.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09475-
y
31.
Gordon, S. (2020). Understanding xenophobic
hate crime in South Africa. Journal of Public
Affairs,
20(3).
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2076
32.
Hlatshwayo, M. (2011). The legacy of apartheid
and xenophobia in South Africa. African
Sociological Review, 15(2), 169
–
185.
33.
Hlatshwayo, M. (2011). Xenophobia in South
Africa: In the Shadow of Apartheid. African
Books Collective.
34.
Jaiswal, A. (2024). Do black women’s lives
matter? A study of the hidden impact of the
barriers to access maternal healthcare for
migrant women in South Africa. Frontiers in
Sociology,
p.
9.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.983148
35.
Jooste, L. (2012). The history of xenophobia in
South Africa. Journal of Southern African
Studies, 38(3), 555
–
572.
36.
Kalu, K. (2020). The Cold War and Africa’s
political culture. Vestnik Rudn International
Relations,
20(1),
11-21.
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-
20-1-11-21
37.
Keatlegile, M., Mabena. (2021). Discarding
Political Hypocrisy and Mystification of
Xenophobia While Maximizing the Economic
Weight of Immigrant Nationals in African
Economies. Doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-7099-
9.CH011
38.
Kerr, P., Durrheim, K., & Dixon, J. (2019).
Xenophobic violence and struggle discourse in
South Africa. Journal of Asian and African
Studies,
54(7),
995-1011.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909619851827
39.
Klotz, A. (2016). Xenophobia in South Africa: A
multi-causal analysis. Journal of Contemporary
African Studies, 34(1), 1
–
18.
40.
Koeijer, V., Park, E., & Sklad, M. (2015). Social
representations of the African other among
participants of a global citizenship course in the
Netherlands. Journal of Social Science
Research,
7(3),
1394-1402.
https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v7i3.3591
41.
Kollapan, J. (2020). Xenophobia in North Africa:
A comparative study of Morocco, Algeria, and
Tunisia. Journal of North African Studies, 25(4),
561
–
581.
42.
Kollapen, J. (2018). Colourblindness and
Contemporary Racism in South Africa.
Routledge.
43.
Kumar, D. (2023). Islamophobia and the
Politics of Empire. Haymarket Books.
44.
Kunst, J., Sam, D., & Ulleberg, P. (2013).
Perceived Islamophobia: scale development
and validation. International Journal of
Intercultural Relations, 37(2), 225-237.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.11.001
45.
Lee, E. (2019). America first, immigrants last:
American xenophobia then and now. The
Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era,
19(1),
3
–
18.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s153778141900040
9
46.
Lee, J., & Zhou, Y. (2022). The Rise in Anti-Asian
Hate During COVID-19: Examining the Role of
Political Rhetoric and Media Representation.
American Journal of Public Health, 112(9),
1324
–
1327.
47.
Mabera, F. (2017). The Right to be Here:
Xenophobia, Violence and the Limits of Post-
Apartheid Citizenship. Wits University Press.
48.
Mamdani, M. (2020). Neither Settler nor
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
38
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Native: The Making and Unmaking of
Permanent Minorities. Harvard University
Press.
49.
Mandela, N. (1995). Long Walk to Freedom
—
Little, Brown, and Company.
50.
Marumo, P., Chakale, M., & Mothelesi, A. (2019).
Xenophobia attack and development: a
discourse in South Africa. African Renaissance,
S1(1),
185-198.
https://doi.org/10.31920/2516-
5305/2019/s1n1a9
51.
Maseland, R. (2017). Is colonialism history?
The declining impact of colonial legacies on
African
institutional
and
economic
development.
Journal
of
Institutional
Economics,
14(2),
259
–
287.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s174413741700031
5
52.
Maseng, J. (2024). Repositioning the concept of
xenophobia in the African context: Why do we
allow ourselves to be defined by others?
International Journal of Research in Business
and Social Science (2147
–
4478), 13(3), 410
–
418.
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i3.3239
53.
Masikane, C. M., Hewitt, M., & Toendepi, J.
(2020). Dynamics informing xenophobia and
leadership response in South Africa. Acta
Commercii,
20(1).
https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v20i1.704
54.
Mavhungu, Abel, Mafukata. (2021). The
Influence of Political Rhetoric on the Evolution
of Xenophobia in Africa. Doi: 10.4018/978-1-
7998-7099-9.CH005
55.
Mberu, B. U., & Bernard, L. (2023). Education
and Xenophobia in Botswana: A Mixed-
Methods Study. International Journal of
Educational Development, 98, 102721.
56.
McConnell, C. (2015). The Anatomy of
Xenophobia: Understanding the Roots of Anti-
Immigrant Sentiment. Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
McConnell, C. (2015). Xenophobia in South
Africa: A historical perspective. Journal of
Southern African Studies, 41(4), 787
–
804.
58.
McCorkle, S., & Rodriguez, J. (2023).
Xenophobia and Its Impact on Immigrant
Mental Health. Journal of Immigrant and
Minority Health, 25(2), 350
–
362.
59.
McCorkle, W. & Rodriguez, S. (2023). Levels of
nationalism among middle and high school
social studies teachers: implications for
promoting equity for immigrant students and
with educators. The Journal of Social Studies
Research,
47(2),
92
–
107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.01.004
60.
Mgogo, Q. and Osunkunle, O. (2023). Students’
perceptions of the influence of media on
perpetuating xenophobia in South African
universities. The Journal for Transdisciplinary
Research
in
Southern
Africa,
19(1).
https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v19i1.1218
61.
Michael, A., Kaplan. (2023). The Rise in Anti-
Asian Racism and Xenophobia in the Time of
COVID-19. Journal of hate studies, Doi:
10.33972/jhs.221
62.
Michalopoulos, S. & Papaioannou, E. (2016).
The long-run effects of the scramble for Africa.
American Economic Review, 106(7), 1802-
1848. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131311
63.
Mlambo, D. N. and Mlambo, V. H. (2021). To
what cost to its continental hegemonic
standpoint: making sense of South Africa’s
xenophobia conundrum post democratization.
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(2),
347-361. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/696
64.
Mlambo, N. (2019). Xenophobia in South Africa:
Causes, Consequences, and Solutions. Palgrave
Macmillan.
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
39
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
65.
Monson, T., & Abdul-Raheem, H. (2021).
Xenophobia in South Africa: Challenges,
Responses, and the Role of Civil Society. HSRC
Press.
66.
Montle, M. (2021). Racist connotations in
xenophobic
outbreaks:
an
Afrocentric
evaluation. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(S1).
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2772
67.
Mthombeni, A. (2022). Xenophobia and
Afrophobia in South Africa: Exploring Causes,
Consequences,
and Solutions.
Palgrave
Macmillan.
68.
Mthombeni, Z. (2022). Xenophobia in South
Africa.
The
Thinker,
93(4),
63-73.
https://doi.org/10.36615/the_thinker.v93i4.2
207
69.
Mubangizi, J. (2021). Xenophobia in South
Africa: Root Causes and Sustainable Solutions.
African Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21(1),
75-98.
70.
Mubangizi, J. (2021). Xenophobia in the labour
market: a South African legal and human rights
perspective.
International
Journal
of
Discrimination and the Law, 21(2), 139-156.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229121101441
2
71.
Mutereko, S. (2024). Migrants in the face of
growing
nativism..
https://doi.org/10.29086/978-0-9869937-5-
6/2024/aasbs15/4
72.
Neocosmos, M. (2022). The Politics of Fear and
Belonging in South Africa: The Xenophobic
Violence of May 2008. Wits University Press.
73.
Ojedokun, O. (2015). The xenophobic attacks in
South Africa and the responses of African
leaders. African Security Review, 24(3), 239
–
249.
74.
Ojedokun, O. (2015). Xenophobia in South
Africa: A regional perspective. African Security
Review, 24(2), 137
–
151.
75.
Oladotun, E., Awosusi., Francis, Olabode, .,
Fatoyinbo. (2019). Xenophobic Prejudice in
Africa: Cultural Diplomacy as a panacea to the
Deteriorating Inter-African Relations.
76.
Olaiya, T. (2020). Colonial basis of anomie in
African youth: implications for political
governance.
DCS.
https://doi.org/10.7176/dcs/10-7-05
77.
Palmary, I. (2006). V. gender, nationalism, and
ethnic difference: feminist politics and political
psychology? Feminism & Psychology, 16(1),
44
–
51.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959-
353506060819
78.
Perry, B. L., Whitehead, A. L., & Grubbs, J. B.
(2020). Islamophobia and mental health: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal
of Affective Disorders, pp. 277, 55
–
66.
79.
Peucker, M. and Fisher, T. (2022). Mainstream
media use for far-right mobilization on the alt-
tech online platform gab. Media Culture &
Society,
45(2),
354-372.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443722111194
3
80.
Pillay, J. (2017). The Politics of Xenophobia in
South Africa. Palgrave Macmillan.
81.
Pillay, J. (2017). Xenophobia in South Africa: A
social psychological perspective. South African
Journal of Psychology, 47(1), 32
–
43.
82.
Posel, D. (2018). Race, Class, and the Apartheid
State. Wits University Press.
83.
Pringle, J. (1973). The South African Institute of
Race Relations: A history. Race & Class, 15(2),
199
–
215.
84.
Pringle, P. (1973). The South African Institute
of Race Relations: The History of a Liberal
Organization, 1929-1972. Oxford University
Press.
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
40
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
85.
Raborife, M., Ogbuokiri, B., & Aruleba, K.
(2024). The role of social media in xenophobic
attack in south Africa. Journal of the Digital
Humanities Association of Southern Africa
(DHASA),
5(1).
https://doi.org/10.55492/dhasa.v5i1.5026
86.
Ramaswamy, C. (2010). The Indian diaspora in
South Africa: A historical perspective. Journal
of Asian and African Studies, 45(1), 35
–
50.
87.
Ramaswamy, C. (2010). The Politics of
Citizenship in South Africa: Indian Origins and
the Making of a Transnational Diaspora.
Palgrave Macmillan.
88.
Ranger, T. O. (1983). The Invention of
Tribalism in Colonial Africa. James Currey.
89.
Rydgren, J. (2005). Is extreme right‐wing
populism
contagious?
explaining
the
emergence of a new party family. European
Journal of Political Research, 44(3), 413
–
437.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-
6765.2005.00233.x
90.
Sadiq, M. and Nawaz, M. (2022). Nexus between
ambidextrous leadership and xenophobia in
construction project success. Irasd Journal of
Management,
4(2),
328-343.
https://doi.org/10.52131/jom.2022.0402.008
2
91.
Seekings, J., & Nattrass, N. (2015). Class, Race,
and Inequality in South Africa. Yale University
Press.
92.
Sempijja, N. (2022). Xenophobia in urban
spaces: Analyzing the drivers and social justice
goals from the Ugandan-Asian debacle of 1972
and xenophobic attacks in South Africa (2008-
2019). Urban Forum, 33(4)_, 503
–
517.
93.
Spencer, S. (2024). Examination of covid stress
syndrome facets and relations to substance
misuse
using
profile
analysis
via
multidimensional
scaling
(pams).
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7pxgu
94.
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Rios Morrison, K.
(2023). Intergroup Threat Theory: An
Integrated Threat Perspective. Current Opinion
in Behavioral Sciences, p. 44, 101132.
95.
Stephens, A. & Boonzaier, F. (2020). Black
lesbian women in South Africa: citizenship and
the coloniality of power. Feminism &
Psychology,
30(3),
324
–
342.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353520912969
96.
Sundstrom, R. and Kim, D. (2014). Xenophobia
and racism. Critical Philosophy of Race, 2(1),
20-45.
https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.2.1.0020
97.
Tarisayi, K., Manik, S., & Ribeiro, N. (2020). An
unabating challenge: media portrayal of
xenophobia in South Africa. Cogent Arts and
Humanities,
7(1),
1859074.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.185
9074
98.
Tella, O. (2016). Understanding xenophobia in
south Africa: the individual, the state and the
international system. Insight on Africa, 8(2),
142-158.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087816655014
99.
Tella, O. (2017). Xenophobia in South Africa:
The challenges of the Rainbow Nation. Africa
Spectrum, 52(1), 91
–
114.
100.
Tewolde, A. (2023). Structural forces shape
xenophobia in south Africa: looking beyond the
human agent. International Social Science
Journal,
73(248),
599-612.
https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12417
101.
Tsheola, J., Ramoroka, M., & Muzondi, L.
(2015). Xenophobic societal attitudes in a
“new” south Africanism: governance of public
perceptions,
national
identities,
and
citizenship. The Journal for Transdisciplinary
Research
in
Southern
Africa,
11(4).
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH (ISSN- 2642-7478)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE08
41
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v11i4.56
102.
Tummala‐Narr
a, P. (2020). The fear of
immigrants. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 37(1),
50-61. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000245
103.
UNHCR. (2024). Global Trends: Forced
Displacement in 2023. UNHCR.
104.
Walle, N. (2009). The institutional origins of
inequality in sub-Saharan Africa. Annual
Review of Political Science, 12(1), 307
–
327.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.0
63006.092318
105.
Wesson, M. (2011). Reasonableness in
Retreat? The Judgment of the South African
Constitutional Court in Mazibuko v City of
Johannesburg. Human Rights Law Review,
11(3), 390
–
414.
106.
Wong-Padoongpatt, G., Barrita, A., & King, A.
(2022). Everyday racism increase for asians in
the U.S. during the covid-19 pandemic. Asian
American Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 318
–
327. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000295
107.
Worden, N. (2004). The Making of Modern
South Africa: Conquest, Apartheid, Democracy
(Historical Association Studies). Blackwell
Publishing.
108.
World Bank. (2023). World Development
Report 2023: Migrants, Refugees, and Societies.
World Bank.
109.
Xenowatch. (2023). Xenophobia in South
Africa: 1994-2024. Retrieved July 19, 2024,
from https://www.xenowatch.org/
110.
Yakushko, O. (2008). Xenophobia. The
Counseling Psychologist, 37(1), 36
–
66.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000008316034
111.
Yingi, E. (2023). Situating dashed prospects
of independence into the xenophobic narrative
in south Africa. Journal of Black Studies, 55(1),
68-89.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934723121057
8
112.
Zaman, U. (2020). Examining the effect of
xenophobia
on
“transnational”
mega
construction
project
(mcp)
success.
Engineering Construction & Architectural
Management,
27(5),
1119-1143.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-05-2019-0227
