This paper traces a technique for a staff advancement program regarding net-upheld learning. Numerous colleges and universities are battling with satisfying the needs of a quickly evolving world. Appearance in this paper depend on encounters from the University of Stavanger. Consideration has been given to the clever utilization of innovation as a method for meeting squeezing difficulties. What's the significance here? I pose a progression of inquiries, the appropriate responses of which structure the reason for a staff improvement program. What characteristics and abilities should our alumni have? What outcomes does this have for the manner in which we approach educating and learning? Also, which job does innovation play?
Carmean, C. and Haefner, J. (2002). Mind Over Matter–Transforming Course Management Systems into Effective Learning Environments. Educause Review, Volume 37, number 6, 2002.
Diaz, D. P. (2001). Taking Technology to the Classroom: Pedagogy-Based Training for Educators. The Technology Source, November/December 2001.
Yaman .H, T. Çayci.T, M. Seyrek.M, Akgül E. Ö. , Y. Gülcan Kurt, İ. Aydin, H. Yaren, E. Çakir, Ö. Özcan, B. Çimen, N. 2010 Effects of vitamin A and C and melatonin on 3-nitrotyrosine formation in guinea pig heart under lipopolysaccharideinduced stress. Turk J Med Sci ; 40 (5): 715-721.
Khadour FH, Panas D, Ferdinandy P, Schulze C, Csont T, Lalu MM, Wildhirt SM, Schulz R.Enhanced 2002 NO and superoxide generation in dysfunctional hearts from endotoxemic rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol.; 283(3):H1108-15.
Shanley MK (1973). Analysis of free sugars in yoghurt. Aust. J. Dairy Technology, 28(2): 5860.
Ahamer, G. (2005e) ‘Surfing Global Change‘: How didactic visions can be implemented. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 22(5), 298 –319.