Application of ERP Systems for Optimizing Corporate Tax Liability Accounting

The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations

30

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei

TYPE

Original Research

PAGE NO.

30-37

DOI

10.37547/tajmei/Volume07Issue08-03

OPEN ACCESS

SUBMITTED

19 July 2025

ACCEPTED

23 July 2025

PUBLISHED

05 August 2025

VOLUME

Vol.07 Issue 08 2025

CITATION

Iryna Baranova. (2025). Application of ERP Systems for Optimizing
Corporate Tax Liability Accounting. The American Journal of
Management

and

Economics

Innovations,

7(8),

30

–

37.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmei/Volume07Issue08-03

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.

Application of ERP Systems
for Optimizing Corporate
Tax Liability Accounting

Iryna Baranova

Owner of the bookkeeping company B&K ADVISORS LLC
Fort Lauderdale, USA

Abstract:

This article examines how enterprise resource

planning (ERP) systems are deployed to enhance the
efficiency of corporate tax accounting and tax-liability
management. Its relevance stems from the growing
complexity of tax regulations and the pressing need to
automate related processes. We synthesize both
empirical and analytical evidence on ERP functionality in
the tax domain, covering automated calculation,
compliance monitoring, report generation, and tax-
planning support. The review includes recent studies
reporting shifts in tax-risk levels, reductions in
compliance costs, and the evolving role of in-house tax
departments. We pay special attention to the
implementation risks associated with ERP roll-outs and
the ethical boundaries of leveraging advanced analytics.
The aim is to identify the enduring impacts of integrating
ERP into tax-accounting workflows. Employing
comparative

and

systems-based

methodologies

alongside case-study and literature analysis, we

conclude by underscoring ERP’s significance as a tool for

strengthening

compliance,

transparency,

and

governance in corporate taxation. Practitioners in
corporate finance, systems integrators, and tax-planning
specialists will find the insights particularly valuable.

Keywords:

ERP systems; tax accounting; tax reporting;

tax-process automation; tax planning; tax compliance;
transformation of the tax function; corporate finance;
tax risk; tax digitization.

Introduction

Today’s corporate finance environment is marked by the

growing complexity of tax accounting and ever-stricter
compliance requirements. In response, an increasing
number of organizations turn to integrated Enterprise
Resource Planning (ERP) systems to automate and

The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations

31

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei

optimize their tax-calculation processes. ERP platforms
serve as comprehensive software suites that unify data
and workflows from diverse business functions

—

accounting, logistics, manufacturing, human resources,
and more

—

on a single foundation. Their adoption

unlocks new tax-management capabilities: dedicated
modules can automate tax calculations, generate
returns, and monitor liabilities in real time.

The relevance of this topic stems from escalating
regulatory demands and the rapid evolution of tax
legislation, both of which compel companies to deploy
more effective tools for recording and planning their tax
obligations. Optimizing tax liabilities does not imply
evasion, but rather accurate reporting, minimization of
errors, lawful utilization of incentives and deductions,
and strategic tax-burden planning. ERP systems can play
a pivotal role in achieving these objectives.

The aim of this article is to synthesize practical
experience in employing ERP systems to optimize
corporate tax-liability accounting and to identify best
practices and measurable benefits derived from such
implementations. To this end, the following tasks are
undertaken:

1.

Describe the core ERP functions relevant to tax
accounting

—

automated tax computations, tax-

report

generation,

integration

with

multi-

jurisdictional tax codes, and so on.

2.

Analyze how ERP implementation impacts tax-
compliance effectiveness

—

accuracy of calculations,

reduced risk of errors and penalties, and accelerated
preparation of tax filings.

3.

Examine ERP’s influ

ence on tax planning and

strategy

—

how enhanced data availability and

analytics enable more proactive tax-planning
decisions.

4.

Present empirical findings on the financial effects of
ERP deployment in the tax domain

—

for example,

changes in effective tax rates and resource savings
within tax departments.

5.

Discuss potential challenges and risks associated
with integrating tax functions into ERP

—

adapting to

local tax regimes, interfacing with legacy systems,
and ensuring adequately skilled personnel.

Methods and Materials

This article draws upon a range of studies examining the

capabilities and impacts of ERP systems for tax‐

accounting purposes. Leimer [7] analyzes architectures
for integrating tax engines into ERP platforms. Gaetano
[5] highlights the relationship between ERP adoption
and shifts in corporate tax policy. Journal [2] describes
how digitalization is transforming the tax function.
Blaufuss et al. [3] provide data on corporate behavior in
terms of tax control rigor and aggressiveness following
ERP rollout. The team in [4] demonstrates practical
approaches to streamlining tax procedures. Source [6]
offers a structured review of ERP applications in
accounting and tax management. Study [1] identifies the
compliance challenges that ERP environments must
address under evolving tax regulations. Finally, The CPA
Practice Advisor [8] examines how firms adjust their

behavior when tax‐authority oversight diminishes.

To meet our objectives, we employed publication
analysis, comparative and systems approaches, and a
critical assessment of the practices and risks identified
across these sources.

Results

Contemporary ERP platforms

—

such as SAP S/4HANA,

Oracle NetSuite, and Microsoft Dynamics

—

ship with

dedicated tax‐automation modules. These built‐in

engines can be configured for the specific regimes and
rates that apply in each jurisdiction where a company
operates. For example, the system automatically applies

the current VAT or sales‐tax rate to every transaction
based on product attributes and point‐of‐sale location,

selecting the correct rate or exemption. As soon as an
entry is posted, the tax engine performs the calculation
in real time, removing the need for manual tax
computations by an accountant. This not only saves
considerable time but also dramatically improves
accuracy: by eliminating human arithmetic errors, the
ERP enforces uniform application of tax rules. Moreover,
leading vendors regularly release patches and updates
that incorporate new rates, calculation rules, or
reporting requirements [8]. As a result

, an ERP‐powered

organisation always operates on the latest regulatory
framework, minimising the risk of errors due to
outdated information.

A

cornerstone

of

ERP‐driven

tax‐accounting

optimisation is the clear separation of functional
components. Through these modules, the system
automates and standardises every key task

—

from tax

calculation to compliance monitoring (see Table 1).

The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations

32

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei

Table 1. Functional Components of ERP Tax Modules. Compiled by the author from [4, 6]

Function

Description

Automatic tax

calculation

Computes taxes automatically using configured algorithms and transaction

attributes

Tax‐report generation

Produces VAT, corporate‐income, and other tax returns from internal data

Real‐time liability

tracking

Records accrued amounts, due dates, and obligations to the treasury

continuously

Regulatory‐base

integration

Updates rates and rules automatically in response to legislative changes

Anomaly detection

and alerts

Monitors deviations from expected values and notifies responsible users of

potential discrepancies

As the table shows, ERP does far more than automate
isolated steps

—it provides end‐to‐end oversight of

accuracy, completeness, and currency for all tax data at
every stage. One of the most valued capabilities is the

one‐click generation of tax returns. At period end, a user

simply runs the appropriate report and the system
aggregates all necessary figures from the accounting
ledgers, then outputs the return in the required format.

This can slash the time needed for tax‐form preparation:

some studies report that ERP implementation reduces
reporting time significantly [6]. Additionally, ERP
platforms can automatically validate data integrity and

consistency: built‐in controllers flag

anomalies

—

such as

sudden jumps in effective tax rate or mismatches
between invoice totals and reported figures

—

and alert

the tax team for investigation.

One of the most tangible benefits of ERP in tax
accounting is the dramatic reduction in errors and
inconsistencies. Where an accountant might once
miscalculate the tax on a transaction or apply the wrong
rate, the ERP system executes every calculation strictly
according to its programmed algorithms and rules,
driving the likelihood of error to near zero [4]. Real-
world case studies show that, post-ERP deployment,
companies experience far fewer tax discrepancies and
amended returns. For example, research has found that
firms using an integrated ERP solution maintain lower
and more stable effective tax rates (ETR) than those
without ERP [5]. This improvement stems in part from

ERP’s ability to structure data comprehensively and

track every tax position, eliminating the risk that a
transaction slips through the cracks.

Moreover, ERP enables multi-level controls: tax teams
can configure automated alerts

—

say, if the VAT payable

exceeds expected thresholds or if tax on a particular
invoice is not computed. Such mechanisms raise the

company’s

overall

compliance

posture,

giving

management confidence that all obligations are
accurately calculated and met.

A natural corollary is a lower risk of fines and audit
findings. Fewer mistakes and missed deadlines translate
directly into a reduced chance of penalties from the tax
authorities.

According

to

Thomson

Reuters,

organizations that have adopted fully integrated ERP-
based tax solutions report significantly fewer interest
and penalty charges, thanks to timely and precise
fulfillment of their obligations. In audit scenarios, ERP
further streamlines interactions: all source data and
journal entries are stored centrally and transparently,
ready for instant export. This not only shortens audit
duration

but

also

simplifies

the

c

ompany’s

explanations

—

inspectors can review an unbroken chain

of transactions and see the exact methodology applied.
Many ERP platforms include an audit-trail module that
logs every data change or configuration update,
reinforcing trust in the integrity of the records [3].

Historically, preparing tax returns and calculations was a
labor-intensive ordeal, consuming large portions of the

finance team’s time—

especially for multiregional

The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations

33

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei

corporations pulling data from disparate systems. By
embedding tax-accounting directly within the ERP,
routine tasks become almost entirely automated.
Gathering fragmented data from subsidiaries and
merging it into a single report used to take weeks; with
ERP, every business unit works on the same platform,
and a consolidated tax report for the entire group can
be generated at the push of a button [6]. Experts

estimate that ERP implementations shorten the “tax

-

period close” by days or even weeks [6]. And this speed

of access unlocks new possibilities for tax planning:
executives can review projected tax burdens on a
quarterly

—

or even monthly

—

basis, based on live data,

enabling them to deploy available incentives, invest in
tax-credit-producing initiatives, or adjust strategies if
their tax efficiency begins to slip.

ERP systems deliver heightened transparency into a

company’s tax positions. Finance executives gain access

to intuitive dashboards that display real-time metrics:
the VAT due for refund or payment, current taxable
profit and its projected tax burden, movements on tax-
payment accounts, deferred-tax balances, and more [4].
This visibility helps prevent unwelcome surprises at
year-end. For instance, if the half-year dashboard shows

an effective tax rate markedly above the plan, the tax
manager can immediately drill down

—

perhaps a credit

wasn’t applied or non

-deductible expenses have

grown

—

and take corrective action in the second half.

ERP’s value is even more pronounced for multinationals

operating across multiple tax jurisdictions. In these
scenarios, the ERP becomes the linchpin for
standardizing tax accounting: instead of each country
using disparate systems and methodologies, the parent
company defines a single, global approach

—

aligned

with international standards

—

and then configures local

variations via settings. This ensures data comparability,
centralized control, and, crucially, consolidated tax
reporting

for

groupwide

oversight.

A

large

multinational, for example, can view its total VAT
liability across all entities in real time and manage cash
flow around VAT refunds in different countries. ERP also
simplifies transfer-pricing compliance

—

intercompany

transactions

are

automatically

recorded

and

documented, easing the preparation of transfer-pricing
disclosures for tax authorities [1, 2].

The practical benefits of ERP in tax accounting are well
documented in both empirical studies and industry case
reports (Table 2).

Table 2. Effects of ERP Adoption on Tax Accounting. Compiled by the author from [6, 8]

Indicator

ERP Effect

Reduction in calculation errors

Minimizes human-error risk in tax computations

Shorter report-preparation cycle

Generates tax returns in hours rather than days or

weeks

Stabilized effective tax rate

Delivers a more predictable long-term tax burden

Enhanced compliance level

Fewer queries and penalties from tax authorities

Improved transparency of tax information

Real-time tax metrics displayed clearly on dashboards

Thus, ERP implementation directly enhances the
operational efficiency of tax processes, their
predictability, compliance, and transparency

—

factors

that bolster a company’s financial resilience. An

intriguing finding from recent academic research is that
ERP adoption fosters more active tax planning by firms
[5]. With access to comprehensive, up-to-date data, tax
departments can delve deeper into both risks and

opportunities. One study observed that, post-ERP,
companies devoted more attention to strategic tax-
burden management

—

optimizing corporate structures,

reallocating functions among divisions in different
regions, and selecting the most favorable tax regimes for
new projects. Statistically, firms saw their long-term
effective tax rates decline after ERP rollout, a change
attributed to improved identification and utilization of

The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations

34

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei

deductions, credits, and incentives.

ERP can also embolden companies to pursue more
aggressive tax-savings strategies

—

such as engaging in

tax arrangements that depend on high-quality data

—

which, while lowering tax bills, may raise their risk
profile. Indeed, researchers found that after ERP
deployment, firms were more likely to engage in
contentious tax practices

—

for example, there was an

uptick in detected offshore arrangements and
aggressive transfer-pricing methods [7]. This result
underscores that ERP is a neutral tool: how it shapes a

company’s tax strategy ultimately depends on corporate

culture and leadership mindset.

Nonetheless, the positive impact is clear: ERP provides

the “transparency” needed to uncover lawful tax

-

reduction opportunities. For instance, the system can

automatically flag accumulated overpayments or
unused credits (such as import VAT) and alert the
company to claim a refund [4]. Without ERP, such
nuances might get lost in paperwork, but with ERP they
become immediately visible

—

allowing the firm to file

refund claims or apply credits to future liabilities in a
timely manner, thereby enhancing cash flow. ERP also
eases the collection of evidence for tax incentives: to
secure an R&D tax credit, for example, companies must
track eligible expenditures separately. ERP lets them tag
these costs from the outset so that, by the time a credit
claim is filed, all necessary detail is already compiled and
validated.

Alongside these advantages, integrating tax modules
into ERP brings certain challenges that must be
addressed during design and implementation (Table 3).

Table 3. Challenges of Integrating ERP into Tax Accounting. Compiled by the author from [1, 4]

Challenge

Consequences

Errors in initial configuration of tax

rules

Incorrect tax calculations, potential penalties

Insufficient staff expertise

Misuse or under-utilization of system capabilities

Data-migration difficulties from legacy

systems

Incomplete or distorted information in tax computations

More aggressive tax behavior post-ERP

Heightened risk of disputes with tax authorities

Dependence on data accuracy

Systemic propagation of errors throughout the tax-

accounting process

These risks do not diminish ERP’s value but high

light the

need for careful implementation management: from
configuring tax algorithms and verifying data to training
personnel and quality-controlling the transition phase.
Success hinges on implementation quality. The
literature also documents failure cases: misconfigured
ERP or flawed data migration can wreak havoc on tax
accounting. Therefore, engaging qualified tax advisors
during rollout, rigorously testing tax modules, and
investing in staff training are essential. On balance,
however, the tone of the literature is optimistic: a well-

executed ERP system becomes the tax department’s
“silent partner,” handling vast volumes of calculation

and organizational work with precision.

Discussion

The analysis results compellingly show that integrating
tax-accounting processes into an ERP system provides
enterprises with significant benefits on both operational
and strategic levels. These advantages can be examined
from several theoretical and practical perspectives.

First, the theory of business-process automation (BPA)
finds clear confirmation here: shifting routine
computational tasks

—

such as accruing taxes and

completing reporting forms

—

to automated execution

increases efficiency, reduces costs, and minimizes

The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations

35

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei

errors. This aligns with BPA’s fundamental

principle that

processes defined by explicit rules and high volumes of
uniform

operations

are

better

performed

algorithmically than manually. Tax accounting fits this
model perfectly: calculations of VAT or corporate
income tax, for example, are strictly governed by
statutory formulas and regulations.

In the realm of financial management, it is worth

mentioning the “fast close” concept—

accelerating the

financial‐period close. ERP is a key enabler of fast close,

including tax close, because it eliminates intermediate
steps of data collection and consolidation. Our
discussion found that companies cut their close cycles
by nearly half. From a theoretical standpoint, this
confirms that integrated information systems reduce so-

called “friction” in processes—

there is no need to wait

for subsidiaries to prepare reports, as all data flows in
automatically. This echoes the efficient information-
flow model: the more tightly connected the information
systems across divisions, the faster one can obtain
aggregated metrics.

Second, the aspect of tax compliance and internal
control is particularly notable. Classical internal-control
theory, as articulated in frameworks like COSO,
emphasizes the importance of a control environment
and information-analytic support to mitigate risks. An
ERP system becomes part of that control environment

—

it enforces unified rules, control points, and logical
validations, thereby enhancing process reliability. One

can say that ERP embeds “built

-

in controls,” which is

preferable to relying on external checks after the fact.
Under the old practice, an accountant prepares the
return and then an internal auditor manually spot-

checks transactions. Under the new ERP‐driven practice,

the system itself will not permit posting a document
without a valid tax code or will calculate the tax
automatically within defined parameters

—

meaning the

error never even arises and does not need to be caught
later. This represents a more progressive approach to
control, consistent with the concept of preventive
control rather than detective control.

The resulting reductions in penalties and the smooth
passage of audits are well explained by this logic

—

if

processes are controlled and transparent from the

outset, then the “output” (the returns) will be correct. It

is also interesting to note that many tax authorities
themselves are moving to electronic reporting formats

and require companies to submit “Standard Audit File

for Tax” (SAF

-T) and similar data files. ERP systems can

automatically generate these standardized audit files. In
this context, it signifies enhanced compliance with
external requirements: the transformation of reporting
from manual documents to electronic protocols is a
trend, and ERP greatly facilitates adherence to that
trend.

Another theoretical lens is the Resource-Based View
(RBV) in strategic management. According to RBV,
possessing unique resources and capabilities grants a
firm competitive advantage. Can an ERP system be
considered such a resource? Partially, yes: ERP is a
sophisticated technological asset, yet many firms can
acquire it. However, the ability to leverage ERP
effectively for tax accounting constitutes an
organizational competence. Not every company can
configure its ERP to extract the maximum insight for tax
planning

—

this requires experienced specialists and

sound change management. Firms that succeed in doing
so realize tax savings and tighter cash-flow control. From
the RBV perspective, then, ERP-based tax accounting
represents a valuable, hard-to-replicate capability (since
ERP integration is complex). This capability can confer an
edge, especially in global markets where optimized tax
positions directly affect price competitiveness.

However, there are important caveats. ERP may
facilitate more aggressive tax behavior

—

manifested in

higher ETR volatility or participation in aggressive
schemes. From an ethical and legal standpoint, this is a
double-edged sword. More complete information is
itself neutral, but in some hands becomes a tool for
aggressive

optimization.

The

concept

of

tax

aggressiveness

—

the tendency to minimize taxes by all

legal (and occasionally borderline-legal) means

—

may be

easier to pursue with ERP, as it enables rapid modeling
of various strategies and their impacts. A company could

simulate, “If we route this transactio

n through a

subsidiary in a low-tax jurisdiction, how will our overall

rate change?” ERP supplies the data for such scenarios.

Ethically, it is crucial that enhanced capabilities not
undermine corporate social responsibility. Here,
corporate culture and regulatory safeguards play a
decisive role.

Numerous cases of failed ERP rollouts are well
documented

—

missed deadlines, budget overruns, and

user resistance. In tax accounting specifically,
misconfiguring tax rules poses a significant risk: if
consultants enter formulas or rates incorrectly, all

The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations

36

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei

downstream calculations will be flawed, and staff may
trust the outputs without question. This risk demands
rigorous validation of settings and a parallel run during
the early post-implementation period. It is advisable, for
example, to reconcile ERP-generated results against
legacy-system outputs or manual calculations over the
first few quarters to ensure accuracy. Data quality also

remains critical: the principle of “Garbage In, Garbage
Out” still applies. If operat

ional units enter erroneous

data, ERP will process it correctly

—

but yield incorrect

conclusions. Mitigating this risk requires mandatory field
checks, well-maintained reference data, and staff
training. Even so, the human factor cannot be entirely
eliminated.

Another aspect is the cost and return on investment of
implementation. ERP is an expensive system, especially
for small and medium-sized enterprises. Consequently,
not every company opts to deploy ERP solely for tax
benefits. However, ERP delivers gains across all
functions, not just in taxation, so the decision is typically
holistic: a company undertakes an ERP rollout for overall
optimization, with the tax module representing one of
the dividends.

In discussing ERP’s strategic role, one may invoke the

concept of the “digital transformation of the finance
function.” Many experts describe the CFO’s evolution
from “chief accountant” to “strategic partner.” The

liberation from routine tasks

—

enabled by ERP

—

is

precisely what allows the finance department (including
tax) to focus on strategy and data analysis. Experience
shows that time spent on mundane tasks indeed
declines, freeing staff to participate in planning and
cross-functional initiatives. This shifts the tax

department’s role from purely bookkeeping

to active

involvement in financial forecasting and strategy
optimization.

Another theoretical consideration is ERP’s impact on

corporate governance. Investors and shareholders
generally view improvements in internal control,
stability of tax metrics, and transparency of reporting
favorably. One can surmise that ERP-equipped
companies earn a trust premium in the markets. Indirect
evidence supports this: studies note reduced volatility in
effective tax rates after ERP deployment, and stable tax
expenses

make

profit

forecasting

easier

for

shareholders and analysts, thereby lowering the risk
premium [5]. Thus, ERP can be part of a robust
governance infrastructure that enhances firm value.

In conclusion, ERP systems have proven themselves a
powerful tool for optimizing tax accounting. They
introduce standardization, automation, and analytics
into an area that traditionally was fragmented and
prone to human error. This leads to greater efficiency,
fewer mistakes, and more informed tax management.
Yet success depends on how skillfully a company
approaches implementation and ongoing use of the
system. Technology is merely the platform; its payoff

hinges on people’s skills and decisions. Accordingly,

companies must not only invest in ERP itself but also
commit to staff training, refine business processes to
leverage new capabilities, and uphold ethical
boundaries in exploiting expanded tax-planning tools.

Conclusion

The deployment of ERP systems demonstrates a high
degree of automation in tax operations, enabling
companies to significantly reduce both the workload
and the time required for preparing tax reports.
Automated tax calculations for every business
transaction and the instantaneous generation of
standard returns eliminate manual computations and
reconciliations. As a result, the closing cycle for tax
periods shrinks dramatically: quarterly reports are
produced in days rather than weeks, thereby enhancing
the agility of financial management.

ERP solutions also ensure calculation accuracy through
embedded logic that strictly adheres to legislative
requirements. Correct rates, algorithms, and automatic
validations minimize the risk of errors, omissions, and
penalties, while the electronic audit trail of transactions
simplifies the audit process. The system acts as a built-in
controller, flagging deviations

—

such as abnormal tax

burdens or unused allowances

—

and preventing many

violations before they occur.

The economic impact of ERP manifests in optimized tax
liabilities and improved financial metrics: companies can
timely apply lawful incentives and deductions, avoiding
overpayments and interest charges. The transparency of
data within the system streamlines cash-flow
management

—

from VAT reimbursements to scheduling

tax payments. This boosts competitiveness and
investment appeal, strengthening market position and
increasing shareholder value.

ERP implementation transforms the role of the tax
function: specialists are freed from routine calculations
and can focus on strategic analysis and advising
management. Integrating tax metrics with overarching

The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations

37

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei

financial KPIs elevates the tax department to a decision-
making partner. However, project success hinges on
implementation quality, correct system configuration,
and thorough staff training. Corporate responsibility and
collaboration with regulators become essential for
preserving the legitimacy of tax optimization and
enhancing the transparency of tax accounting.

References

1.

Accnu. (2024).

Tax management in ERP: Ensuring

compliance and efficiency

.

https://accnu.in/tax-

management-in-erp-ensuring-compliance-and-
efficiency/

2.

American Legal Journal. (2025).

ERPs and digital

transformation

of

corporate

tax

.

https://americanlegaljournal.com/erps-and-digital-
transformation-of-corporate-tax/

3.

Blaufus, K., Reineke, J., & Trenn, I. (2023). Perceived
tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks
and tax planning: An empirical analysis.

Journal of

Business

Economics,

93

,

509

–

557.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01116-6

4.

Digital Workplace Solutions, CRM and ERP
Consulting Services, Business Tax. (2024, March 21).

How ERP systems can ease burdens for tax teams

.

Withum.

https://www.withum.com/resources/how-erp-
systems-can-ease-burdens-for-tax-teams/

5.

Gaetano, C. (2023, June 29). ERP systems associated
with lower tax burden, more aggressive tax
positions,

says

study.

Accounting

Today

.

https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/erp-
systems-associated-with-lower-tax-burden-more-
aggressive-tax-positions-says-study

6.

KPC Team. (n.d.).

ERP and accounting: How ERP

systems

revolutionize

accounting

software

.

https://kpcteam.com/kpposts/erp-and-accounting-
how-erp-systems-revolutionize-accounting-
software

7.

Lymer, P. (2024, January 31). ERP systems and tax
engines.

The

VAT

Consultancy

.

https://thevatconsultancy.com/erp-systems-tax-
engines/

8.

The CPA Practice Advisor. (2024, June 6). Companies
take more aggressive tax positions when IRS budget
is

cut.

ttps://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2024/06/06/c

ompanies-take-more-aggressive-tax-positions-
when-irs-budget-is-cut/106510/