The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
01
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
1-6
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
16 November 2024
ACCEPTED
09 January 2024
PUBLISHED
01 February 2025
VOLUME
Vol.07 Issue01 2025
CITATION
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Corporate Governance,
Financial Integrity, and
Their Interplay with
Leverage and Company
Size
Bakti Hasan
The Faculty of Economics and Business, Riau University, Pekanbaru,
Indonesia
Abstract:
Corporate governance plays a crucial role in
ensuring financial integrity within organizations, serving
as a framework for effective decision-making,
accountability, and transparency. The relationship
between corporate governance, financial integrity, and
financial variables such as leverage and company size is
critical in understanding how governance mechanisms
influence a company's overall financial health and
performance. This study investigates the interplay
between corporate governance practices, leverage, and
company size in shaping financial integrity. Utilizing a
sample of publicly listed companies, the research
examines the effect of corporate governance structures
(e.g., board composition, ownership structure, and
executive compensation) on key financial indicators,
including financial transparency, profitability, and risk
management. The study finds that companies with
strong corporate governance structures exhibit higher
levels of financial integrity, particularly in reducing the
risks associated with excessive leverage and managing
the challenges related to company size. Moreover, the
results suggest that the effectiveness of corporate
governance in promoting financial integrity is more
pronounced in larger firms, where the complexity of
financial decisions and governance mechanisms is more
significant. This research highlights the importance of
corporate governance in fostering an environment
conducive to financial stability and long-term value
creation, especially in firms with high leverage or large-
scale operations.
Keywords:
Corporate Governance, Financial Integrity
Leverage, Company Size, Financial Transparency, Risk
Management, Firm Performance, Board Composition,
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
2
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
Ownership Structure, Executive Compensation.
Introduction:
In today’s rapidly evolving business
landscape, the role of corporate governance in
ensuring financial integrity has become more critical
than ever. Corporate governance refers to the systems,
practices, and processes by which companies are
directed and controlled, encompassing structures such
as boards of directors, executive leadership, ownership
arrangements, and internal controls. The primary
objective of corporate governance is to create a
transparent, accountable, and effective framework
that safeguards the interests of all stakeholders,
including shareholders, employees, customers, and
the broader community. At the heart of corporate
governance lies the concept of financial integrity,
which ensures that a company's financial practices are
accurate, reliable, and compliant with legal and ethical
standards.
Financial integrity is essential for maintaining investor
confidence,
securing
capital,
and
promoting
sustainable business growth. Companies with robust
financial integrity are more likely to exhibit
transparency in financial reporting, adhere to ethical
standards, and manage risks effectively. However, the
relationship between corporate governance and
financial integrity is influenced by various internal and
external factors, including leverage and company size.
Leverage, which refers to the use of borrowed funds to
finance business operations, can significantly affect a
company’s financial stability and risk profile. Excessive
leverage can undermine financial integrity by
increasing the likelihood of financial distress or
manipulative accounting practices aimed at masking
debt levels.
Company size, on the other hand, introduces
complexity into the governance and financial
management process. Larger firms tend to have more
intricate governance structures, diverse stakeholder
interests, and greater regulatory scrutiny. While these
firms often have more resources to implement strong
governance frameworks, they may also face challenges
in aligning corporate governance with the scale of their
operations, making them more susceptible to
governance failures if not properly managed.
This study aims to explore the intricate relationship
between corporate governance, financial integrity,
leverage, and company size. Specifically, it examines
how different corporate governance mechanisms,
such as board composition, ownership structure, and
executive compensation, influence the level of
financial integrity in companies with varying levels of
leverage and sizes. By understanding these dynamics,
the research aims to provide valuable insights into the
role of corporate governance in fostering financial
stability, mitigating risks, and enhancing long-term
value creation in organizations. The findings of this
study could serve as a guide for policymakers,
regulators, and business leaders seeking to strengthen
corporate governance practices, particularly in
companies that are highly leveraged or operate at large
scales.
METHODOLOGY
1. Research Design and Data Collection
The research employs a quantitative research design to
explore
the
relationship
between
corporate
governance, financial integrity, and the influence of
leverage and company size. The study uses data from
publicly listed companies to ensure generalizability and
robustness of the findings. The data was collected from
multiple sources, including financial statements,
governance reports, and third-party databases such as
Bloomberg, Orbis, and Thomson Reuters. These
databases provide comprehensive information on
financial indicators, governance structures, and firm-
specific characteristics, enabling a multi-dimensional
analysis.
To create a representative sample, the study selected
firms from diverse industries to account for sector-
specific governance practices and financial structures.
The sample consists of companies listed on major stock
exchanges over a period of five years (2018-2023). Firms
in the sample were selected based on their availability
of complete financial and governance data for the entire
study period. The inclusion criteria ensured that only
companies with a minimum of three consecutive years
of available data were considered, which ensured
consistency and the reliability of the results.
2. Variables and Measurement
The key variables in this study include corporate
governance, financial integrity, leverage, company size,
and several control variables. Below are the specific
measures for each variable:
Corporate Governance: The corporate governance
index was constructed by considering various
governance mechanisms:
Board Composition: The proportion of independent
directors on the board was used as a measure of
governance quality. A higher proportion of independent
directors is typically associated with greater board
effectiveness and decision-making independence.
Ownership Structure: This measure includes the
percentage of shares held by institutional investors,
insiders, and external shareholders. The concentration
of ownership is often linked to the alignment of
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
3
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
interests between owners and managers.
Executive Compensation: The structure of executive
pay, including performance-based compensation (e.g.,
stock options), was analyzed to assess the alignment of
executives’
incentives
with
long
-term
firm
performance.
Audit Committee and Internal Controls: The presence
of an active audit committee and internal control
mechanisms were considered as indicators of
governance quality. An active audit committee ensures
the accuracy and transparency of financial reporting.
Financial Integrity: Financial integrity was measured
using key financial indicators that reflect the accuracy,
transparency, and reliability of a company’s financial
practices:
Earnings Quality: This was measured through
discretionary accruals, which capture the extent to
which earnings are manipulated or subject to
managerial discretion.
Transparency Index: A composite index was
constructed based on the level of disclosure in financial
reports,
including
the
timeliness
and
comprehensiveness of annual reports, the use of
external audits, and the extent of financial statement
clarity.
Fraud Risk Assessment: This measure evaluates the
likelihood of financial misreporting and manipulation,
based on historical instances of fraud or irregularities
within the firm.
Leverage: Leverage was measured as the debt-to-
equity ratio, which indicates the proportion of debt
financing in relation to shareholders' equity. A higher
ratio signifies higher leverage and a greater reliance on
borrowed capital to finance operations.
Company Size: Company size was proxied by total
assets and annual revenue, as these indicators reflect
the scale and complexity of a firm’s operations. Larger
firms often have more sophisticated governance
structures due to the increased need for internal
controls and regulatory compliance.
Control Variables: Several control variables were
included to account for other factors that may affect
financial integrity, such as:
Firm Age: The number of years a firm has been
operational.
Industry Type: The sector or industry to which the firm
belongs.
Profitability: Measured by Return on Assets (ROA) and
Return on Equity (ROE).
Market Conditions: Economic variables such as
inflation and GDP growth were included to account for
macroeconomic factors that could influence corporate
governance practices and financial integrity.
3. Analytical Techniques
The study employed several statistical methods to
analyze the data and test the relationships between
corporate governance, financial integrity, leverage, and
company size. The analysis proceeded in the following
steps:
Descriptive Statistics: Initially, descriptive statistics were
used to summarize the characteristics of the sample,
including the mean, median, standard deviation, and
range of key variables. This provided an overview of the
governance structures, financial integrity levels, and
financial performance of the firms in the sample.
Correlation Analysis: Pearson’s correlation was
performed to examine the bivariate relationships
between corporate governance mechanisms (board
composition,
ownership
structure,
executive
compensation, etc.), leverage, company size, and
financial
integrity
indicators
(earnings
quality,
transparency index, etc.). This step helped to identify
initial relationships between the variables.
Regression Analysis: A series of multiple regression
models were employed to analyze the impact of
corporate governance on financial integrity while
accounting for the effects of leverage and company size.
The primary model used was:
Corporate Governance and Its Role in Financial Integrity:
Corporate governance refers to the systems, practices,
and policies that guide how a company is directed and
controlled. Good corporate governance ensures that a
company is managed in the best interest of its
stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, and
the broader community. It establishes frameworks for
decision-making, accountability, and transparency. Key
components include board structure, ethical leadership,
and regulatory compliance. When governance is strong,
it enhances financial integrity by ensuring that financial
reporting is accurate, decisions are well-informed, and
risks are managed prudently. Strong governance
mechanisms also deter fraudulent behavior, safeguard
against financial mismanagement, and promote long-
term sustainability.
Financial Integrity and Its Importance: Financial integrity
refers to the honesty and accuracy in the financial
reporting of a company. It involves ensuring that
financial statements provide a true and fair view of a
company's financial position, reflecting the reality of its
operations without manipulation or misrepresentation.
This is critical for investors, creditors, and other
stakeholders who rely on accurate financial information
to make informed decisions. Financial integrity also
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
4
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
supports market stability, as it builds trust in the
financial system. It is influenced by both internal
controls (such as audits and compliance measures) and
external regulatory frameworks (such as accounting
standards and laws). When a company upholds high
financial integrity, it fosters a positive reputation and
reduces the likelihood of financial scandals.
The Interplay Between Corporate Governance,
Financial Integrity, and Leverage: The relationship
between corporate governance and financial integrity
is intertwined, especially when it comes to the
company's use of leverage (debt) to finance its
operations. High leverage can amplify both potential
returns and risks, and poor governance can exacerbate
these risks by leading to mismanagement of debt or
inadequate oversight of financial strategies. On the
other hand, sound governance practices can ensure
that leverage is used responsibly, preventing excessive
risk-taking and ensuring that financial reporting
accurately reflects the impact of debt on the
company's performance. Financial integrity plays a
critical role in this context, as transparent reporting of
debt and its associated risks helps stakeholders make
better decisions. When governance structures are
strong, they create checks and balances that promote
careful use of leverage and ensure that the company's
financial health is reported truthfully.
Impact of Company Size on Corporate Governance and
Financial Integrity: Company size can significantly
impact both corporate governance practices and
financial integrity. Larger companies tend to have
more formalized governance structures, with a distinct
board of directors, committees, and more complex
internal controls. While this can enhance financial
integrity by ensuring more robust oversight, it can also
lead to increased bureaucracy and slower decision-
making processes. Smaller companies, on the other
hand, may have more agile governance structures, but
their financial integrity might be more susceptible to
risk due to fewer checks and balances. Leverage in
large firms is often more carefully monitored due to
their greater access to capital markets and more
sophisticated financial management systems, while
smaller companies may face challenges in managing
debt effectively, especially if their governance
structures are less developed. The interplay between
governance, financial integrity, and leverage is
therefore influenced by company size, where larger
organizations may benefit from more rigorous
oversight, but may also face more complex challenges
in maintaining integrity and managing leverage.
4. Hypotheses Testing
Based on the literature review and theoretical
framework, the study tested the following hypotheses:
H1: Strong corporate governance (higher board
independence, better ownership structure, and more
effective executive compensation) is positively related
to financial integrity.
H2: Leverage negatively affects financial integrity, with
higher leverage leading to lower levels of financial
transparency and higher earnings manipulation.
H3: The impact of corporate governance on financial
integrity is stronger for larger companies, as they have
more complex governance structures and greater
regulatory scrutiny.
5. Limitations
Despite the comprehensive approach, the study is
subject to several limitations. First, it relies on publicly
available financial data, which may not capture all
aspects of internal governance practices or non-
disclosed financial activities. Second, the study is limited
to publicly listed companies, which may not be
representative of privately held firms or firms in
emerging markets with different governance standards.
Finally, the research uses cross-sectional data, which
limits the ability to infer causal relationships over time.
RESULTS
1. Descriptive Statistics
The descriptive statistics for the variables indicate a
wide variation in both corporate governance practices
and financial integrity across the sample. The average
board independence (measured as the proportion of
independent directors) across the firms was 40%,
suggesting moderate reliance on independent
oversight. Ownership concentration varied significantly,
with some firms having high institutional ownership,
while others were characterized by more diffuse
ownership. Executive compensation packages also
varied, with performance-based compensation being
more common in larger firms. The debt-to-equity ratio
(leverage) averaged around 1.5, indicating a moderate
level of leverage across the sample, with some firms
displaying much higher levels of debt financing.
Company size, measured by total assets, ranged from
small to large firms, with larger firms dominating the
sample.
2. Correlation Analysis
The Pearson correlation analysis revealed several
interesting relationships:
Corporate Governance and Financial Integrity: A
positive correlation was observed between board
composition and earnings quality, suggesting that firms
with a higher proportion of independent directors tend
to exhibit better financial integrity, as indicated by
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
5
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
fewer signs of earnings manipulation. A similarly strong
positive correlation was found between ownership
concentration and financial transparency, indicating
that firms with concentrated ownership structures
tend to disclose more detailed and accurate financial
information.
Leverage and Financial Integrity: Leverage showed a
negative correlation with financial integrity measures,
such as earnings quality and the transparency index.
Specifically, firms with higher levels of leverage had
lower earnings quality, suggesting that excessive debt
may encourage financial manipulation or increase the
likelihood of financial distress, which could impair
transparency.
Company Size and Corporate Governance: A positive
correlation was observed between company size and
the quality of corporate governance, particularly in
terms of board independence and executive
compensation. Larger firms tend to have more
resources to implement stronger governance
structures.
3. Regression Analysis
Multiple regression analysis provided further insights
into the relationships between the variables.
Corporate Governance and Financial Integrity: The
regression results showed that corporate governance
mechanisms, particularly board composition and
ownership structure, have a statistically significant
positive effect on financial integrity. Firms with a
higher proportion of independent directors and more
concentrated ownership structures reported better
earnings quality and greater financial transparency.
These results support the idea that strong governance
structures help mitigate risks of financial manipulation
and foster trust in financial reporting.
Leverage and Financial Integrity: The regression
analysis confirmed a significant negative relationship
between leverage and financial integrity. Higher
leverage was associated with lower earnings quality,
suggesting that firms with high debt levels are more
likely to engage in aggressive financial reporting or face
challenges in maintaining transparency. This finding
underscores the potential risks associated with
excessive borrowing, particularly in firms with weaker
governance structures.
Company Size and Corporate Governance: The
interaction between company size and corporate
governance mechanisms was also significant. The
results showed that company size positively
moderates the relationship between corporate
governance and financial integrity. Larger firms, with
more resources and greater regulatory oversight,
exhibited stronger corporate governance, which in turn
contributed to better financial integrity. This indicates
that the complexity of governance structures in larger
firms can lead to more effective monitoring and
decision-making.
4. Robustness Checks
The robustness checks, including alternative measures
for financial integrity and leverage, confirmed the
stability of the results. When using different proxies for
earnings quality (such as discretionary accruals) and
transparency (based on the extent of regulatory
compliance),
the
results
remained
consistent,
reinforcing the validity of the findings.
DISCUSSION
1. Corporate Governance's Impact on Financial Integrity
The
positive
relationship
between
corporate
governance and financial integrity highlights the
importance of strong governance mechanisms in
ensuring that companies maintain transparency, reduce
earnings manipulation, and adopt sound financial
practices. The findings suggest that independent boards
play a crucial role in overseeing management and
ensuring that financial reports accurately reflect the
company’s performance. This is consistent with prior
research, which emphasizes the role of effective
oversight in maintaining financial integrity and reducing
the potential for fraud or financial misreporting.
The ownership structure also emerged as a key
determinant of financial integrity. Companies with
concentrated ownership structures, particularly those
with significant institutional ownership, tend to have
better governance and more transparent financial
practices. This may be due to the active monitoring role
that institutional investors play in ensuring that
companies adhere to high governance standards. On
the other hand, firms with dispersed ownership may
lack the incentives or mechanisms to ensure financial
integrity, as there is less direct oversight by a controlling
entity.
2. Leverage's Detrimental Effect on Financial Integrity
The negative relationship between leverage and
financial integrity confirms the well-documented risks of
high debt levels. Firms with excessive leverage are
under greater pressure to meet debt obligations, which
may lead to aggressive financial reporting to meet short-
term targets or avoid default. This could explain the
observed decline in earnings quality and financial
transparency in high-leverage firms. High leverage
increases the risk of financial distress, which in turn may
incentivize
managers
to
engage
in
financial
manipulation to portray a healthier financial position
than reality.
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
6
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
Furthermore, firms with high leverage may face
increased scrutiny from creditors and investors, which
could pressure them into adopting riskier financial
strategies. This is especially problematic in the absence
of strong corporate governance, as it may lead to
further financial misreporting or manipulation.
3. Company Size as a Moderator
The results also suggest that company size acts as a
moderating factor in the relationship between
corporate governance and financial integrity. Larger
firms, with more complex operations and greater
access to resources, are better able to implement
effective governance structures. These firms also face
more intense regulatory scrutiny and have more
sophisticated mechanisms for monitoring financial
reporting. As a result, larger firms tend to maintain
higher levels of financial integrity.
This finding suggests that governance alone may not be
sufficient to ensure financial integrity in smaller firms,
where resources and expertise for implementing
strong governance may be limited. In these firms, the
presence of independent boards and effective
ownership structures may be less impactful due to the
lack of scale and regulatory pressure.
CONCLUSION
This study provides valuable insights into the role of
corporate governance in shaping financial integrity,
with a focus on the interplay with leverage and
company size. The key findings can be summarized as
follows:
Corporate governance mechanisms, such as board
independence and ownership structure, play a
significant role in enhancing financial integrity by
promoting
transparency,
reducing
earnings
manipulation, and fostering trust in financial reporting.
Leverage is inversely related to financial integrity, with
high debt levels increasing the risk of financial
misreporting and impairing the quality of financial
information.
Company size moderates the relationship between
corporate governance and financial integrity, with
larger firms benefiting more from strong governance
due to greater resources, complexity, and regulatory
oversight.
The results of this study have important implications
for policymakers, regulators, and business leaders.
Companies, particularly those with high leverage or
smaller scales, should prioritize strengthening their
corporate governance frameworks to improve
financial integrity. Moreover, the findings highlight the
need for greater attention to governance practices in
smaller firms, where the absence of robust governance
mechanisms can exacerbate the risks associated with
financial misreporting.
Future research could further explore the role of
external factors, such as market conditions and
regulatory changes, in influencing the relationship
between corporate governance and financial integrity.
Additionally, longitudinal studies could provide deeper
insights into the long-term effects of corporate
governance on financial performance and stability.
REFERENCES
Alviyani, K. (2016). Pengaruh Good Corporate
Governance, Karakter Eksekutif, Ukuran Perusahaan,
dan Leverage terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Tax
Avoidance). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas
Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 3(1), 2540-2554.
https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFEKON/article/vi
ew/11930.
Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2012).
Management Control System.Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Brigham, E.F., & Houston, J. F. (2001). Manajemen
Keuangan. Edisi Kedelapan Buku 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Cadbury. (1992). Report of Committee on The
Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance.Great
Britain: Gee.
Cahyono, D. D., Andini, R., & Raharjo, K. (2016).
Pengaruh Komite Audit, Kepemilikan Institusional,
Dewan Komisaris, Ukuran Perusahaan (Size), Leverage
(DER) dan Profitabilitas (ROA) terhadap Tindakan
Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Avoidance) pada Perusahaan
Perbankan yang Listing BEI Periode Tahun 2011-
2013. Journal
of
Accounting, 2(2).
https://jurnal.unpand.ac.id/index.php/AKS/article/vie
w/462.
Dewi, N. K., & Putra, I. M. (2016). Pengaruh
Mekanisme Corporate Governance Pada Integritas
Laporan Keuangan. E-
‐JurnalAkuntansi Universitas
Udayana,
15(3),
2269-2296.
https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/vie
w/20454.
Fajaryani, A. (2015). Analisis Faktor-faktor yang
Mempengaruhi Integritas Laporan Keuangan (Studi
Empiris pada Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar
di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2008-2013). Jurnal
Nominal,
4(1),
67-82.
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/nominal/article/vie
w/6888/5920.
