Commodity Forfeit As A Way To Ensure The Compliance Of Obligations

National Database of Legislation (www.lex.uz), April 6, 2019

Rakhmonqulov X. The right of obligation (general rules). /For master's students majoring in law "Private Law". -Tashkent. TSLI, 2005. –P.82-83.

D.Raximov. A new way to enforce obligations: Expected changes from the Civil Code. https://uza.uz/oz/society/new-method-to-supply-measures-experfections-fu-a-05-06-2020.

Torkin D.A. Unnamed ways of securing obligations. Diss. c.l.sc. -Tyumen, -2005. –P.182.

Gabaraev E.A. Security assignment of a monetary claim: a security measure or a way to secure the performance of obligations? // Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University (MSLA) No.2. 2019 DOI: 10.17803 / 2311-5998.2019.54.2.147-154.

Entrepreneurship Law (General part): Textbook/Editor-in-Chief: Sh.Ruzinazarov. –Tashkent, “Konsauditinform”, 2002. -P.439.

Fedorova Yu.S. Commodity forfeit as an unnamed way of ensuring the fulfillment of obligations // Questions of modern jurisprudence: collection of articles. XVI int. scientific, practice. Conf.-Novosibirsk: SibAK, 2012.

Akateva M.D. Forfeit is an effective way to protect the violated right. //Legal regulation. No.3 (171) 2014. -P.28.

Omonov A. Penalty as a way to fulfill contractual obligations // Bulletin of the Supreme Economic Court. 2014. - No.9.

Grishin D.A. Penalty: questions of theory and practice. Abstract diss. c.l. sc. –M., 2004. –S.7; R.S. Bevzenko Penalty expressed in non-monetary form // Legislation. 2006, No.6, -S.36-43; Bychkov A.I. Practical aspects of using the “property penalty” construction // Lawyer. 2012. -No.12, -S.18-23; A.G. Karapetov, A.I. Saveliev. Freedom of concluding unnamed contracts and its limits // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2012.-No.4, -S.32-33.

A.A. Novikova Non-monetary penalty: theoretical and practical problems of application // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. -2011. - No.2. -P.70

Konovalov A.I. Penalty in commercial turnover. Abstract. Ph.D. dissertation - St. Petersburg. 2003.-P.7.

N.V. Golovchansky Theoretical and practical aspects of non-monetary forfeit // Polymatis, No.6, 2017 | Polymathis Scientific Journal, No. 6 (2017) –P. 29.

Meyer D.I. Russian civil law; In the 2nd part of the 8th ed. fix. and add. 1902. Part 2. -Moscow. -Statut. 1997, -P.133. (a series of classic Russian civil law).

Shodmanov F.Yu. Problems of civil liability for breach of contractual obligations in a market economy. Diss. doc. law. –T., -2002. –P.191.

Yakimova A.M. Non-monetary penalty: theoretical and practical aspects // Modern problems of lawmaking and law enforcement. - Irkutsk, 2016. - P.152-155.

Doing Business, Enforcement of Contracts - Uzbekistan and 5 Leading Countries in 2019. Analysis of reform trends, accumulated experience and recommendations for further progress. http://sud.uz/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/ court-dbru.pdf

Bodilovsky A.V. Economics ahead is right. Unnamed methods of ensuring the fulfillment of obligations // Unleash your scientific potential: a collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the I International Scientific and Practical Youth Conference. - Nizhny Novgorod, 2016. -P. 4-7.

Pergament M.Y. Contractual forfeit and interest in Roman and modern civil law. Odessa, 1899, -P.254.

Vyatchin V.A. On the legal nature of the forfeit. // Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. -2014. -No.2, -P.123.

http://base.garant.ru/10164072/dc8ac69baa61b785e8510c75c9714f10/

https://kodeksy-by.com/grazhdanskij_kodeks_rb.htm

https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=1006061#pos=3024;-54

https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/ru/tm/tm037ru.pdf

http://minfin.tj/downloads/009%20grajd_kodeks_rus.pdf

https://matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/download/31702/75/ru/pdf

https://www.icnl.org/wp-content/uploads/Azerbaijan_Civil_Code_RUS.pdf

http://www.parliament.am/law_docs/050598HO239rus.html?lang=rus

D.S. Kasimdzhanova. The legal nature of the concept and subject of the penalty. // Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. No. 3 (23) 2011. –P.159.

http://www.pravo.lv/likumi/05_4_gz.html

https://meget.kiev.ua/kodeks/grazdanskiy-kodeks/glava-49/

https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/ru/md/md149ru.pdf

http://minjust.gov.kg/ru/content/313

http://juristpraha.cz/ru/tag/новый-гражданский-кодекс-чехия.

Karapetov A.G. Penalty as a means of protecting the rights of a creditor in Russian and foreign law. Moscow: Statut, 2005.S. 17-27.

Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the Volga Region dated September 18, 2001. No.3559 / 01-2. Access from ref. Legal system "Consultant Plus".

Resolution of the Federal Arbitration Court of the North Caucasian District of April 12, 2002. No. F08-1203 / 02. Access from ref. Legal system "Consultant Plus".

Cases, Materials & Texts on Contract Law (Casebooks on the Common Law of Europe) // Beale H., Kotz H., Hartkamp A., Tallon D. 2002. -P.869.

Dutch Civil Code. Book 6. Article 91.

Karkhalev D.N. Ways to protect civil rights under the laws of Latin America. // Journal of Foreign Law and Comparative Law. -№3, 2016. -P.56.

Khokhlov V.A. Responsibility for violations of the civil law contract. Tagliatti: Volzhsky un-t. them. V.N. Tatishchev. 1997.-P.234.

Komisarov E.G., Torkin D.A. Unnamed ways of securing obligations in civil law. -M .: -2008, -S.125.