Teaching Gender-Sensitive Language And Gender-Biased Terminology
Keywords:
Abstract
This article will define gender sensitive language and illustrate its importance in communication, especially business writing. In addition, this article examines the reasons for gender sensitive language and gives some examples to gender biased terminology.
Similar Articles
-
Issues Of Artistic Concept In Contemporary Uzbek Poetry
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 08 (2021) / Berdiyeva Zulayxo, -
The Concept Of Aesthetic
-
The Concept Of A Historical Man In The Novel Alisher Navoi
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 10 (2021) / Sadullo Dilmurodovich Kuronov, -
Comparative And Linguocultural Analysis Of The Concept "Gender" In Uzbek And English Languages
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 06 (2021) / Komilova Nilufar Abdilkadimovna, -
General Didactic Basis Of An Integrated Approach To The Organization Of Teaching In Higher Education Institutions
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 05 (2021) / Toshkhonov Azizbek Tursunboevich, -
Genesis And Essence Of Genre Concept
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 12 (2021) / Gulnoza Murodilovna Oripova, -
“Turning To The Nationalism” On The Destiny Of Uzbek Intelligents
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 05 (2021) / Ergash Yusupov, Akmal Yusupov, -
NARROW AND BROAD INTERPRETATION OF THE CONTACT CONCEPT OF "PEDAGOGICAL LANGUAGE" IN THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT OF TERMS RELATED TO PEDAGOGY IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 05 (2023) / Mokhinur B. Nizomova, -
ABOUT CAUSES OF SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR AMONG ADOLESCENTS
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 03 (2022) / Alimova Elena Gennadyevna , -
The Concepts Of "Goodness" And "Evil" In The Linguistic Image Of The World And Their National-Cultural Characteristics
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 05 (2021) / Farrukh Komiljon Ugli Normamatov,
References
Bodine, A. (1975). Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’1. Language in society, 4(2), 129-146.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). John M. MacEachran memorial lecture series; 1985. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Foertsch, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). In search of gender neutrality: Is singular they a cognitively efficient substitute for generic he?. Psychological science, 8(2), 106-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9280.1997.tb00691.x
Gabriel, U. & Gygax, P. (2016). Gender and linguistic sexism. In Giles, H. & Maass, A. (eds). Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 177–192). New York: Peter Lang.
Gabriel, U., Gygax, P. M., & Kuhn, E. A. (2018). Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome?. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 844-858. doi: 10.1177/1368430218771742.
Hegarty, P., Mollin, S., & Foels, R. (2016). Binomial word order and social status.
Hegarty, P., & Bruckmüller, S. (2013). Asymmetric explanations of group differences: Experimental evidence of Foucault’s disciplinary power. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 176-186. doi:10.1111/spco.2013.7.issue-3
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions.
Parzuchowski, M., Bocian, K., & Gygax, P. (2016). Sizing up objects: The effect of diminutive forms on positive mood, value, and size judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01452
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, 157192.
Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757-769.
Viennot, E. (2014). Non, le masculin ne l’emporte pas sur le féminin! Editions IXE.
Wyrobková, A., Gygax, P., & Macek, P. (2015). Human and man side by side, woman trapped in a different reality: word associations in Czech. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 59(1).
Guidelines for Non-Sexist Use of Language from the American Philosophical Association-https://www.apaonline.org/page/nonsexist
General Principles for Reducing Bias from the American Psychology Association - https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/bias-free-language/general-principles
Non-Sexist Language Reloaded, University of Lancaster (RiGLS) - https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancasteruniversity/content-assets/images/athena-swan/BrochureSexistLanguage_final.pdf
