This article discusses the introduction of the structural method in Uzbek literature, preliminary research, its role and importance in the analysis of the work. The study focuses on how to distinguish between a work of art and a literary text. The main differences were initially explained in opposition and presented in a simple tabular form for researchers. The article serves to shed light on the essence and significance of the structural method.
Rasulov A. (2007). Structure and structuralism. Source: Rasulov A. Art is an indispensable criterion. Tashkent. "East".
Yuldashev Q. (2008). Fundamentals of artistic analysis. UrSU.
Kholbekov M. (2014). Structural literature (brochure). Tashkent. Fan. p.136.
Yoqubov I. (2006). Possibilities of structural poetics. Uzbek language and literature. Number 3. pp.3-12;
Kholbekov M. (2013). Roland Bart and structural literature. Uzbek language and literature. Number 2.
Meliev S. (2008). On structuralism and structural analysis. Uzbek language and literature. Number 2.
Qahramonov Q. (2009). Interpretation of the structural method in literary criticism. Uzbek language and literature. Number 5.
Karim B. (2016). The alphabet of the soul. Tashkent. Ghafur Ghulam Publishing House.
Saidova R., Murodov G‘. (2019) Character relations in the literary text. Tashkent. Nowruz.
Lotman Yu.M. (1970). The structure of the literary text. Moscow: Art, p.371.
Bart R. (1989). Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics. Moscow: Progress, p. 616.
Greimas A.J. (2004). Structural semantics. Moscow: Academic project. p.368.
Saidova R., Murodov Ғ. (2019). Badiy Matnda belgi Munosabatlari. Toshkent: Navruz. p.64.
Zikirov, M. C., Qosimova, S. F., & Qosimov, L. M. (2021). Direction of modern design activities. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR), 10(2), 11-18.