INFLUENTIAL FACTORS SHAPING TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNING: INSIGHTS FROM PROFESSIONALS' PERSPECTIVES
Abstract
This research paper explores the influential factors that shape the landscape of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) from the perspectives of professionals in the education and training industries. Technology has dramatically transformed the way we approach learning, and understanding the key factors that influence its successful implementation is crucial for educators and policymakers. Through in-depth interviews and surveys, this study captures insights from a diverse group of professionals actively engaged in TEL initiatives. The research identifies and analyzes the critical factors affecting the adoption, implementation, and effectiveness of technology in learning environments. The findings shed light on challenges, opportunities, and best practices that can guide stakeholders in fostering meaningful and impactful TEL experiences. By synthesizing the experiences and opinions of these professionals, this paper provides valuable recommendations for harnessing technology to optimize the learning process and prepare learners for the demands of the digital age.
Similar Articles
-
EXPLORING CREATIVITY IN STUDENTS' LEARNING STYLES ACROSS DIFFERENT HIGH SCHOOLS IN IRAN
-
SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER AND STUDENTS’ ATTITUDE TOWARD LEARNING IN UNIVERSITY OF BAMENDA, CAMEROON
-
THE IMPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS: CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL
-
CAREER MATURITY OF STUDENTS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF SELF-EFFICACY AND SELF-ADVOCACY
-
IMPROVING STUDENTS’ PARAGRAPH WRITING SKILLS THROUGH BLENDED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES AT HIGHER PEDAGOGICAL EDUCATION
-
UNBOXING UNDERSTANDING: SELF-EXPLANATION PROMPTING AS A KEY TO UNLOCKING DEEP LEARNING IN CALCULUS
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 01 (2024) / Sufyani Marethi, Hadi Firdos Prabawanto, -
UNVEILING MATH MASTERY: CRAFTING DYNAMIC LEARNING TOOLS TO ELEVATE PROBLEM-SOLVING PROFICIENCY
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 01 (2024) / Epa Wira Suparman, -
Theoretical Rationale For Content-Language Integrated Learning (Clil) In Educational Institutions
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 06 (2021) / Tashmatova Gulnara Rafailovna , -
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF PROJECT-BASED LEARNING AS A STRATEGY TO LEARN ABOUT CULTURES
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 05 (2024) / Akharraz Mohamad, -
CULTIVATING UNDERSTANDING: ENHANCING SOCIAL STUDIES EDUCATION THROUGH EFFECTIVE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST LEARNING APPROACHES
References
Acevedo, M. and Krueger, J.I. (2004), “Two egocentric sources of the decision to vote: the voter’s illusion and the belief in personal relevance”, Political Psychology, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 115-134.
Alsabawy, A.Y., Cater-Steel, A. and Soar, J. (2016), “Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 64, November, pp. 843-858.
Bateman, S., Brooks, C., McCalla, G. and Brusilovsky, P. (2007), Applying Collaborative Tagging to E-Learning, Banff, Alberta.
Bekebrede, G., Warmelink, H. and Mayer, I.S. (2011), “Reviewing the need for gaming in education to accommodate the net generation”, Computers & Education, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 1521-1529.
Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H. and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, David McKay Company, New York, NY.
Branch, R.M. and Merrill, M.D. (2012), “Chapter 2: characteristics of instructional design models”, in Reiser, R.A. (Ed.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 3rd ed., international ed., Pearson, Boston, MA., pp. 8-16.
Bratengeyer, E., Steinbacher, H.-P. and Friesenbichler, M. (2016), “Die österreichische Hochschul-E- Learning-Landschaft: Studie zur Erfassung des Status quo der E-Learning-Landschaft im tertiären Bildungsbereich hinsichtlich Strategie”, Ressourcen, Organisation und Erfahrungen.
Brosius, F. (1999), SPSS 8.0: Professionelle Statistik unter Windows, Aufl, Nachdr, MITP-Verl, Bonn.
Bullen, M. and Morgan, T. (2011), “Digital learners not digital natives”, La Cuestión Universitaria, Vol. 7, pp. 60-68.
Chan, T.-W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., Patton, C., Cherniavsky, J., Pea, R., Norris, C., Soloway, E., Balacheff, N., Scardamalia, M., Dillenbourg, P., Looi, C.-K., Milrad, M. and Hoppe, U. (2006), “One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: an opportunity for global research collaboration”, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 3-29.
