Authors

  • Njeba Ruzette Fakeh
    Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education of the University of Buea Cameroon
  • Professor Yaro Loveline Yulah
    Department of Curriculum Studies and Teaching, Faculty of Education of the University of Buea Cameroon
  • Professor Bongwong Bruno
    Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education of the University of Buea Cameroon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume06Issue09-07

Keywords:

Female Adolescents Cooperation Peers Influence

Abstract

This study was designed to examine female adolescents’ cooperation and its influence on their self-esteem development in state universities in Cameroon. The study was guided by two objectives which examine how peer influence and group work influence female adolescent students’ self-esteem in the early years of university studies in Cameroon state universities. The survey research design using the exploratory approach was adopted for the study. The population comprised of undergraduate female adolescents of ages 17 to 19 years in the University of Buea, in the South West, Dschang, West region, Douala, Littoral and Bamenda, North West Regions of Cameroon. The sample size of the study consisted of 703 undergraduates female adolescent age 17-19 using the simple random sampling technique. The instruments use for data collection were a questionnaire and an interview guide. Data from the questionnaire was analysed using SPSS 23.0, with the aid of descriptive and inferential statistical tools while open ended questions were analysed thematically. The hypotheses of the study were tested using a non-parametric test (Spearman’s Rho test) presented at 95% level of confidence interval with alpha set at 0.05 levels accepting 5% margin of error. Findings reviled that majority 73.8% of female adolescent students agreed that peers influence their self-esteem in the early years of their university studies while 26.3% of them disagreed and the overall mean of 2.95 below 3.0 on a mean scale of 1-4 implies that peers influence for a significant proportion of students is not high and 74.2% of female adolescent students like to work in groups while 25.8% of them do not and the overall mean of 2.92 below 3.0 on a mean scale of 1-4 implies that group work for a significant proportion of students is not high. Hypothetically, there is a significant and positive relationship between cooperation and self-esteem development of female adolescent students (R-value 0.466**, p-value 0.000 < 0.05). The positive sign of the correlation value denotes that self-esteem of the female adolescent students increases with increase in their ability to cooperate with others and decreases with decrease in their ability to cooperate with others. Therefore, it was generally recommended that, educational institutions in Cameroon actively promote and implement cooperative learning strategies within their curricula. Given the significant positive relationship between cooperation and the self-esteem development of female adolescent students, fostering collaborative environments can greatly enhance both academic performance and personal growth. Institutions should design group activities that encourage peer interaction, idea sharing, and mutual support.


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

58

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

PUBLISHED DATE: - 14-09-2024
DOI: -

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume06Issue09-07

PAGE NO.: - 58-79

FEMALE ADOLESCENTS’ COOPERATION AND

ITS INFLUENCE ON THEIR SELF-ESTEEM
DEVELOPMENT IN STATE UNIVERSITIES IN
CAMEROON


Njeba Ruzette Fakeh

Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education of the

University of Buea Cameroon

Professor Yaro Loveline Yulah

Department of Curriculum Studies and Teaching, Faculty of Education of

the University of Buea Cameroon

Professor Bongwong Bruno

Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education of the

University of Buea Cameroon

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

59

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

INTRODUCTION

The transition from childhood to adolescence is a
critical period marked by significant psychological,
social, and emotional changes. For female
adolescents, this stage is particularly important as
they navigate various challenges that can impact
their self-esteem. Adolescence is a critical period of
human development characterized by significant,
physical, cognitive, and social/emotional changes.

During this period, the formation of one’s self

concept becomes especially crucial. (Harker,
2012). Adolescence, defined as the period of life
between puberty and adulthood, is associated with
heightened social influence, especially from peers
(Blakemore, 2018). According to Tchombe and Lo-
oh (2012), adolescence is a period marked by
sensitization to appropriate gender identity and

roles. Adolescence encompasses elements of
biological growth and major social role transitions
(Azzopardi, 2018).

Self-esteem refers to an individual's overall
subjective evaluation of their own worth and value
as a person. It is a symbol of mental health
(Keramati, 2012). It encompasses one's beliefs,

feelings, and attitudes towards oneself. Self‐

esteem in earlier life predicts later physical and
mental health, satisfaction with relationships and
work, economic prospects and longevity.
According to (Rosenberg 2011), self-esteem is the
positive or negative perspective that one has

towards oneself and the evaluation of one’s own

thoughts and feelings. It is considered a personal
psychological characteristic related to self-

Abstract


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

60

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

judgement based on one’s values about human

beings (Alesi, 2012).

Context and Justification of Study

In the context of state universities in Cameroon,
understanding

the

dynamics

of

female

adolescents' cooperation is essential, as it plays a
pivotal role in shaping their self-esteem
development. According to Erikson's psychosocial
development theory, the establishment of a strong
sense of self is crucial during this period,
influencing future relationships and personal
identity (Erikson, 1968). Cooperation among peers
can foster a supportive environment that enhances
self-esteem. Research indicates that collaborative
activities help individuals develop social skills,
build trust, and establish meaningful connections
(Johnson & Johnson, 2009). In a university setting,
where academic pressures and social dynamics
can be overwhelming, cooperative interactions
among female students may serve as a buffer
against the challenges they face. These interactions
not only promote a sense of belonging but also
facilitate the sharing of experiences and coping
strategies, which can significantly influence self-
esteem.

In Cameroon, cultural norms and societal
expectations often impose additional pressures on
female adolescents, affecting their self-perception
and confidence. Studies show that societal
attitudes toward gender roles can lead to feelings
of inadequacy and lower self-esteem among young
women (Nyangweso, 2018). However, cooperative
practices, such as group projects, study sessions,
and peer support networks, can counteract these
negative influences by providing a platform for
empowerment and self-affirmation. Moreover, the
impact of cooperation on self-esteem development
is further compounded by the educational
environment. State universities in Cameroon are
microcosms of broader societal trends, where the
interplay of academic and social factors can either

uplift or hinder self-esteem. Research has
demonstrated that academic success, often
facilitated by cooperative learning, correlates
positively with self-esteem (Marsh & Craven,
2006). Therefore, fostering cooperation among
female students is not just beneficial for academic
performance but also essential for their emotional
well-being.

Furthermore, the role of mentorship and role
models in promoting cooperation among female
adolescents cannot be overlooked. Effective
mentorship programs can encourage collaboration
and provide guidance, thereby enhancing self-
esteem. As noted by McCullough et al. (2020),
mentorship fosters a sense of purpose and
belonging, which are critical for self-esteem
development. By creating an environment where
female students can support one another and
share their successes, universities can play a
crucial role in shaping their self-image. The
cooperation among female adolescents in state
universities in Cameroon is a vital factor
influencing their self-esteem development. By
promoting collaborative learning and supportive
relationships, educational institutions can help
mitigate the adverse effects of societal pressures
and foster a positive self-concept. Understanding
this relationship not only highlights the
importance of cooperation in academic settings
but also underscores the need for targeted
interventions to support the psychological well-
being of female students. Continued research in
this area is essential to develop effective strategies
that empower young women during this
transformative phase of their lives.

In essence, the development of self-esteem during
adolescence is a critical aspect of personal growth,
particularly for female adolescents in state
universities in Cameroon. This developmental
period should be characterized by supportive
social interactions, strong peer relationships, and a


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

61

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

collaborative academic environment that fosters
confidence and self-worth. However, the reality
often differs significantly from this ideal. Many
female adolescents face challenges such as societal
gender norms, lack of encouragement from peers,
and limited access to resources that promote
collaboration and mutual support. These obstacles
hinder their ability to engage meaningfully with
their peers, leading to feelings of isolation and
diminished

self-esteem.

Furthermore,

the

competitive nature of academic environments may
exacerbate these issues, as female students may
feel pressured to outperform one another rather
than cooperate as such the consequences are
profound. Low self-esteem among female
adolescents can lead to a range of negative
outcomes, including academic underachievement,
mental health issues, and difficulty in establishing
healthy relationships. This not only impacts their
personal development but also affects their
broader social and academic contributions,
perpetuating cycles of inequality and limiting their
future opportunities. Understanding the dynamics
of cooperation among female adolescents and its
influence on their self-esteem development is
crucial. By situating this problem within the
context of state universities in Cameroon, this

research aims to identify female adolescents’

cooperation and its influence on their self-esteem
development in state universities in Cameroon.

This study has as major objective to evaluate how

female adolescents’ cooperation influence their

self-esteem development in state universities in
Cameroon. Specifically, the study investigates:

i.

To determine the influence of peers on

female adolescent students’ self

-esteem in the

early years of university studies in Cameroon state
universities.

ii.

To study the extent to which group work

influence female adolescent students’ self

-esteem

in the early years of university studies in

Cameroon state universities.

Based on the above objectives, one general
hypothesis was tested which verified the
significant

relationship

between

female

adolescents ‘students’ cooperation and female

adolescent students

’ self

-esteem in the early years

of university studies in state universities in
Cameroon.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Cooperation is the act of working together towards
a common goal. Johnson & Johnson, 2009).
cooperation involves two or more people coming
together as partners to work interdependently
toward a common goal that will benefit all
involved. Much of the current research on
cooperation has been conducted in the context of
social dilemmas (Weber et al. 2004). In educational
settings, this often involves collaborative learning
and teamwork.

Moreover, female adolescents are more likely to be
cooperative and exercise more personal restraint
when using endangered common resources if the
resources are being shared with ingroup members
rather than with outgroup members (Van Vugt et
al. 2000). Furthermore, they work harder for and
are more loyal to groups they identify as their
ingroup (Van Vugt & Hart 2004). In society-level
social dilemma situations, the impact of an

individual’s identity with a group and the

associated acceptance of the norms and values of
those superordinate entities has also been shown
to be important for increasing a wide variety of
cooperative actions, ranging from participation in
social activism and protests to organizational
citizenship (Cropanzano & Byrne 2000).

Johnson and Johnson (2013) in their study found
that students who participated in cooperative
learning activities had significantly higher levels of
self-esteem compared to those who participated in
traditional classroom activities. A study conducted


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

62

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

by Maria Isabel in 2020 result show that
cooperative learning is an effective tool for
encouraging university students to develop
academic goals that motivate them to fully engage
with the tasks they are set in order to acquire
knowledge and skills. These findings contribute
new knowledge to the conceptual framework on
cooperative learning.

Cooperation moments for female adolescents’

students

Students often cooperate on assigned group
projects across various subjects. These projects
can range from short-term in-class activities to
long-term assignments (Johnson & Johnson, 2009).
female Students may engage in peer tutoring
programs, where more advanced students help
their peers with challenging subjects or concepts
(Topping, 2005).Many teachers incorporate
collaborative learning activities into their lessons,
encouraging students to work together to solve
problems or discuss ideas (Slavin, 2014).In science
classes, students often work in pairs or small
groups to conduct experiments and analyze results
(Hofstein & Lunetta, 2004).Team sports and group
activities in physical education classes require
cooperation and teamwork (Bailey, 2006).

Student clubs, organizations, and after-school
programs often involve collaborative efforts
Students may form informal study groups to
prepare for exams or work on homework together
Cooperative learning often occurs during class
discussions and debates, where students build on
each other's ideas (Howe & Abedin, 2013).This
pedagogical approach often involves students
working together on extended projects that
address

real-world

problems

(Thomas,

2000).Digital tools and platforms are increasingly
used to facilitate student cooperation, both in and
out of the classroom (Resta & Laferrière, 2007).
Older students may work with younger students in
mentoring or tutoring roles Community service

projects often involve students working together
towards a common goal (Billig, 2000). Drama
productions, musical ensembles, and art
installations often require extensive student
cooperation Many schools implement peer
mediation programs where students help resolve
conflicts among their peers

Some teachers use cooperative strategies for
classroom management, such as assigning group
roles or responsibilities classrooms often employ
cooperative learning strategies to support
students with diverse needs (Jenkins et al.,
2003).In language classes, students often practice
speaking and comprehension skills through pair
and group work This approach often involves
students working in small groups to solve complex,
real-world

problems

(Hmelo-Silver,

2004).Students may review and provide feedback
on each other's work as part of the learning
process These programs often involve cooperation
between students from different cultural
backgrounds (Deardorff, 2006). A supportive
family environment contributes to higher self-
esteem (Bulanda & Majumdar, 2009). When family
members engage in cooperative behaviors and
foster a cooperative family environment, it can
positively influence self-esteem in several ways:
Sense of belonging and support: Cooperation
within the friends creates a sense of belonging and
support for female adolescents, which enhances
their self-esteem. Feldman,2012

When female students actively collaborate,
communicate, and work together as a team, it
conveys a message of inclusivity and support. This
cooperative environment fosters a sense of
security, acceptance, and value, contributing to
higher self-esteem (Laible et al., 2004).
Experiences of abuse or neglect can severely
impact self-esteem (Turner et al., 2010). Improved
communication and conflict resolution skills
gained through cooperation can enhance social


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

63

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

confidence

and

self-esteem

(Webb

&

Mastergeorge, 2003). Cooperative friends’

dynamics involve recognizing and valuing each
other's contributions and efforts. When students
acknowledge and appreciate the contributions of
female adolescents, it enhances their sense of self-
worth and competence. This validation and
recognition promote a positive self-perception and
contribute to higher self-esteem (Deci & Ryan,
2000).

Impacts of cooperation on female adolescents’

self esteem

Cooperative learning experiences have been found
to enhance self-esteem in adolescents (Slavin,
2014). The relationship between conformity and
self-esteem is complex and can be both positive
and negative: Excessive conformity can lead to a
loss of individuality, potentially lowering self-
esteem (Harter, 2012). Conforming to unrealistic
standards negatively impact div image and self-
esteem (Clay et al., 2005). Conformity can provide
a sense of belonging, which may enhance self-
esteem (Newman et al., 2007). Adhering to positive
group norms can boost self-esteem through social
approval (Brechwald & Prinstein, 2011).

Cooperation can foster a sense of belonging, which
is crucial for self-esteem: Cooperative experiences
can increase feelings of peer acceptance, a
significant predictor of self-esteem in adolescence

(Harter, 2012). Cooperation can improve students’

psychological

balance

and

self-esteem

(Simsek,2013), For this reason, it is important to
explore the relationship between teamwork skills
and self-esteem. When students engage in
cooperative activities, work together towards
shared goals, and communicate in a supportive and
respectful manner, it creates a positive social
environment.

These

positive

interactions

contribute to feelings of belonging, acceptance, and
competence, leading to higher self-esteem (Smith
& Hamon, 2012; Laible et al., 2000).

The sense of community developed through
cooperation can provide emotional support,
enhancing

self-esteem

(Osterman,

2000).

Cooperation

within

students

provides

opportunities for female adolescents to develop
and demonstrate their skills and competence.
When students engage in cooperative tasks, such
as problem-solving, decision-making, and sharing
responsibilities, it allows adolescents to contribute
and showcase their abilities. This involvement and
competence-building experience can boost self-
esteem (Padilla-Walker & Bean, 2009).

Cooperation can improve social skills and peer
relationships, which in turn positively affect self-
esteem (Ginsburg-Block et al., 2006). Cooperative

friends’ interactions help female adolescents

develop effective emotional regulation and conflict
resolution skills. When students engage in open
communication, active listening, and cooperative
problem-solving, it models constructive ways of
managing emotions and resolving conflicts. These
skills contribute to higher self-esteem by fostering
a sense of control, autonomy, and competence in
handling challenging situations (Barber, 2002).
Girls often place higher value on social
relationships and cooperation, making these
experiences potentially more impactful for their
self-esteem

(Rose

&

Rudolph,

2006).

Communication with peers increases significantly
during adolescence and peer relationships become
more intense than in other stages Kruk, (2004).
and more influential to the teen, affecting both the
decisions and choices being made Spencer (2010)
Communication within peer groups allows
adolescents to explore their feelings and identity
as well as develop and evaluate their social skills.
Peer groups offer members the opportunity to
develop social skills such as empathy, sharing, and
leadership. (Swanson, Edwards, Spencer, 2010)

Participation in cooperative activities can lead to
increased feelings of competence and social


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

64

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

acceptance, key components of self-esteem
(Roseth et al., 2008). Cooperation cultivates a
sense of belonging, emphasizing the value of each
member in a group. Adolescents, through
successful

cooperative

endeavors,

view

themselves as valuable contributors, thereby
enhancing self-worth. Across various cultural and
academic contexts, cooperative learning has often
been associated with positive outcomes. In
essence, cooperation and prosocial behavior are
interrelated, with both having the potential to
positively influence adolescent self-esteem.
Cooperative learning in academic settings has been
linked to improved self-esteem: Participation in
academic group work can enhance academic self-
concept, a key component of overall self-esteem
(Marsh & O'Mara, 2008). Cooperative learning
strategies have been found to improve both
academic

achievement

and

self-esteem

simultaneously (Johnson et al., 2014).

From a theoretical point of view, the theory of
emotional intelligence by Daniel Goleman (1995)
helps individuals to guide their thinking and
actions. Goleman defined emotional intelligence as
the ability of individuals to recognize their feelings
and those of others for motivation and
management of emotions for themselves and their

relationship with others. Goleman’s key

components are self-awareness, motivation,
empathy, social skills, self-regulation which is very
important to the study as it relates to cooperation

and conformity. Goleman’s

theory is important

because it challenges the traditional view of
intelligence. While IQ and technical skills are
important, Goleman argues that EI is equally, if not
more, vital to success in female adolescents
personal and professional life. Since the
publication of Goleman's book, there has been an
explosion of interest in emotional intelligence in
business, education, and psychology. Emotional
intelligence encompasses the ability to recognize
and understand one's own emotions and those of

others, as well as the ability to manage and
regulate emotions effectively.

Research suggests that female students with
higher levels of emotional intelligence are more
likely to engage in prosocial behavior, such as
empathy, cooperation, and altruism (Eisenberg et
al., 2006). By understanding and empathizing with
the emotions of others, students with higher
emotional intelligence are more likely to display
prosocial behavior towards their peers and
contribute positively to their social environment.
Emotional intelligence is also linked to self-esteem.
Students with higher emotional intelligence tend
to have better self-awareness, self-confidence, and
self-acceptance, which contribute to a healthier
self-esteem (Mikolajczak et al., 2007). When
students possess a strong sense of self-worth and
self-acceptance, they are more likely to have
positive perceptions of themselves and engage in
behaviors that enhance their self-esteem, such as
setting and achieving goals, managing stress, and
building positive relationships with others.

METHODOLOGY

The survey research design using the exploratory
approach was adopted for the study. The
population comprised of undergraduate female
adolescents of ages 17 to 19 years in the University
of Buea, in the South West, Dschang, West region,
Douala, Littoral and Bamenda, North West Regions
of Cameroon. The sample size of the study
consisted of 703 undergraduates female
adolescent age 17-19 using the simple random
sampling technique.

The instruments use for data collection were a
questionnaire and an interview guide. Data from
the questionnaire was analysed using SPSS 23.0,
with the aid of descriptive and inferential
statistical tools while open ended questions were
analysed thematically. The hypotheses of the study
were tested using a non-parametric test

(Spearman’s Rho test) presented at 95% level of


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

65

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

confidence interval with alpha set at 0.05 levels
accepting 5% margin of error.

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

The findings of the study will be presented and
supported by literature and the works of other
researchers. Quantitative data will be presented
first followed by qualitative data.

4.1 Peers influence and female adolescent

students’ self

-esteem in the early years of

university studies in Cameroon state universities

The table below stu

dents’ opinion on peers’

influence and female adolescent students’ self

-

esteem in the early years of university studies in
Cameroon state.

Table 26:

Female Adolescents’ Appraisal of Peer Influences

Items

Stretched

Collapsed

Mean

Std.
Dev

SA

A

D

SD

SA/A

D/SD

I often like working with others to
complete tasks.

454

(64.6%)

177

(25.2%)

55

(7.8%)

17

(2.4%)

631

(89.8%)

72

(10.2%)

3.52

.743

I feel belonged because I share ideas
with my friends.

200

(28.4%)

388

(55.2%)

104

(14.8%)

11

(1.6%)

588

(83.6%)

115

(16.4%)

3.11

.696

I always respect the ideas of others.

239

(34.0%)

332

(47.2%)

120

(17.1%)

12

(1.7%)

571

(81.2%)

132

(18.8%)

3.14

.749

I hate to express appreciation for the
help of others. **

120

(17.1%)

209

(29.7%)

340

(48.4%)

34

(4.8%)

329

(46.8%)

374

(53.2%)

2.41

.825

I believe working together with
friends does not improves my overall
self-image. **

71

(10.1%)

174

(24.8%)

352

(50.1%)

106

(15.1%)

245

(34.9%)

458

(65.1%)

2.70

.845

I never support my peers
academically because there is no
effective communication. **

45

(6.4%)

167

(23.8%)

352

(50.1%)

139

(19.8%)

212

(30.2%)

491

(69.8%)

2.83

.815

MRS and Overall Mean

1172

(27.8%)

1941

(46.0%)

829

(19.7%)

276

(6.5%)

3113

(73.8%)

1105

(26.3%)

2.95

.778

N=703

**Items with coding reversed during calculation of MRS.

In overall, 73.8% of female adolescent students
agreed that peers influence their self-esteem in the
early years of their university studies while 26.3%
of them disagreed and the overall mean of 2.95
below 3.0 on a mean scale of 1-4 implies that peers
influence for a significant proportion of students is
not high. Specifically, the high percentage of
respondents (89.8%) who enjoy working with
others to complete tasks aligns with research on
the benefits of cooperative learning. Johnson and
Johnson (2009) emphasize that cooperative
learning not only enhances academic achievement
but also increases student satisfaction and
engagement. When students work collaboratively,
they can leverage each other's strengths, leading to
improved outcomes and a more enjoyable learning

experience. This preference for teamwork reflects
a broader trend in educational settings, where
collaborative

approaches

are

increasingly

recognized for their effectiveness in promoting
learning.

Also, 83.6% of respondents feel a sense of
belonging when sharing ideas with friends
underscores the importance of social connections
in educational contexts. According to Emmons &
McCullough (2003) the need to belong is a
fundamental human motivation, and social
interactions that involve sharing ideas can
significantly enhance individuals' feelings of
connectedness. When students engage in dialogue
and

exchange

perspectives,

they

foster

relationships that contribute to a supportive


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

66

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

community, which is essential for emotional well-
being and academic success. The commitment of
81.2% of respondents to respecting the ideas of
others reflects a crucial aspect of effective
collaboration. Respect in group settings fosters a
culture of openness and inclusivity, which is
essential for productive teamwork. According to
Tjosvold (1998), respect among group members
enhances communication, reduces conflict, and
promotes a positive atmosphere for collaboration.
When individuals feel their ideas are respected,
they are more likely to contribute actively and
engage in meaningful discussions.

Moreso, 69.8% (491) of respondents support
peers

academically

due

to

effective

communication. According to Hattie (2009),
effective communication is critical for fostering a
supportive learning environment where students
can exchange ideas and resources. When students
communicate openly, they can clarify concepts,
share knowledge, and provide constructive
feedback, which enhances their academic
performance. Furthermore, Vygotsky (1978)
emphasizes

that

social

interaction

and

communication are essential for cognitive
development, suggesting that collaborative
learning environments where communication is
prioritized can lead to improved academic
outcomes. Furthermore, 65.1% of respondents
believe that group work enhances self-image is
consistent with the literature on teamwork and
self-perception. Research by Dirks & Ferrin (2002)
demonstrates that positive interdependence in
group settings fosters a sense of belonging and
enhances self-esteem among participants. When
individuals work collaboratively toward common
goals, they often experience a boost in self-image
due to the recognition of their contributions and
the support they receive from their peers. Finally,
53.2% of respondents like to express appreciation
when helped by others underscores the
importance of gratitude in fostering positive
relationships. Research by Emmons and
McCullough (2003) shows that expressing
gratitude can enhance interpersonal relationships
and contribute to overall well-being. When
individuals acknowledge and appreciate the
support they receive, it reinforces positive
behaviors and encourages further cooperation.

4.3 Group work and female adolescent students’ self

-esteem in the early years of university

studies in Cameroon state universities.

The table below st

udent’s opinion on group work and female adolescent students’ self

-esteem in the early

years of university studies in Cameroon.

Table 26:

Female Adolescents’ Appraisal of Group Work

Items

Stretched

Collapsed

Mean

Std. Dev

SA

A

D

SD

SA/A

D/SD

I always show consideration for
others during group work.

142

(20.2%)

497

(70.7%)

64

(9.1%)

0

(0.0%)

639

(90.9%)

64

(9.1%)

3.11

.530

I enjoy often collaborating with
others as a group to fine solutions to
a problem.

274

(39.0%)

307

(43.7%)

112

(15.9%)

10

(1.4%)

581

(82.6%)

122

(17.4%)

3.20

.752

I always play fair in any group
activity.

177

(25.2%)

328

(46.7%)

182

(25.9%)

16

(2.3%)

505

(71.8%)

198

(28.2%)

2.95

.774

I hate to participate in group work at
school because it slows my
achievements. **

75

(10.7%)

146

(20.8%)

353

(50.2%)

129

(18.3%)

221

(31.4%)

482

(68.6%)

2.76

.873

I am not good at managing my group
members. **

66

(9.4%)

167

(23.8%)

347

(49.4%)

123

(17.5%)

233

(33.1%)

470

(66.9%)

2.75

.852


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

67

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

I always hate being the leader in my
group. **

68

(9.7%)

168

(23.9%)

313

(44.5%)

154

(21.9%)

236

(33.6%)

467

(66.4%)

2.79

.895

MRS and Overall Mean

999

(23.7%)

2145

(50.9%)

839

(19.9%)

232

(5.5%)

3144

(73.7%)

1071

(26.3%)

2.92

.779

N=703 **Items with coding reversed during calculation of MRS.

In overall, 74.2% of female adolescent students
like to work in groups while 25.8% of them do not
and the overall mean of 2.92 below 3.0 on a mean
scale of 1-4 implies that group work for a
significant proportion of students is not high.
According to the theory of self-categorization by
Henri Tajfel (1970) individuals perceive and
categorize themselves and others within social
groups, and how these group identities influence
behavior and attitudes. Social identity is the
portion of an individual's self-concept derived
from perceived membership in a relevant social
group. That is when students identify strongly with
their school or educational group, they are more
likely to engage in prosocial behaviour such as
helping, sharing, and cooperating with their peers
(Harter, 2012).

Specifically, 90.9% (639) of respondents always
show consideration for others during group work
while 9.1% (64) do not. Also, 82.6% (581) of
respondents often enjoy collaborating with others
to fine solutions to a problem while 17.4% (122)
do not. To elucidate, 71.8% (505) of respondents
agreed to always play fair in any group activity
while 28.2% (198) do not. In order words, female
adolescent students who do not cooperate are
more likely to lack social identity thus, capable of
causing them not to share, help or cooperate with
others. Cooperation is the act of working together
towards a common goal. Female adolescent
students are more likely to be cooperative and
exercise more personal restraint when using
endangered common resources if the resources
are being shared with ingroup members rather
than with outgroup members (Van Vugt et al.
2000). This implies that for effective cooperation

to foster development of self-esteem, there is need
for resources be made available for effective work
among group members. In addition, the need for
resources, every member in the group must feel
comfortable because female adolescent students
might work harder and more loyal to groups, they
identify as their ingroup (Van Vugt & Hart, 2004).

Similarly, 68.6% (482) of respondents like to
participate in group work at school while 31.4%
(221) hate such because it slows their
achievements. Findings also revealed that 66.9%
(470) of respondents are good at managing group
members while 33.1% (233) are not. Finally,
66.4% (467) of respondents like being a leader in
a group while 33.6% (236) dislike such
responsibility. Cooperation from students has a
significant impact on the self-esteem of female
adolescent students. When family members and
friends engage in cooperative behaviours and
foster a cooperative environment, it positively
influences self-esteem in different ways such as
sense of belonging and support: When students
actively collaborate, communicate, and work
together as a team, it conveys a message of
inclusivity and support which has proven to have
significant and positive effect on development of
self-esteem. Cooperation within students provides
opportunities for female adolescents to develop
and demonstrate their skills and competence.
When students engage in cooperative tasks, such
as problem-solving, decision-making, and sharing
responsibilities, it allows adolescents to contribute
and showcase their abilities which contribute to
development of their self-esteem (Padilla-Walker
& Bean, 2009).

Female Adolescent Students’ Response Opinion


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

68

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

Table 29:

Respondents’ Opinion if Cooperation Boast their Self

-Esteem.

Cooperation
boast self-
esteem

Reasons

Themes

Quotations

Yes

Building
confidence

“Yes, it does because each time I cooperate, I always feel confident sometimes
especially when the outcome is good.”
“Bold and confident.”
“The feeling of I can also do it like others or I am also important and have something
to contribute makes me feel confident thus positive self-esteem.”
‘Yes, bold and confident during presentation.”

Learning from
others

“Yes, it does because I cooperated with people of different levels of intelligence and
learn from them.”
“Yes, it does because I learn from others.”
‘Yes, it does because I learn from others.”

Feel valued

“I feel like a leader especially if I have the leading role.”
“Cooperation allows me to leverage my knowledge and abilities to help solve
problems, which makes me feel useful and valuable to those I'm working with.”

Satisfied

“Yes, it provides a sense of satisfaction and purpose.”
“When I cooperate with others, I feel a sense of satisfaction.”

Build self-
efficacy

“Cooperation can certainly support my self-efficacy and purpose when I cooperate
it increases my self-esteem”

Good

“It feels good especially when I have a lot to contributes and I am dealing with smart
people.”

Self-acceptance

“Yes, it does increase my self-esteem because I always contribute and feel accepted
by the group.”

Feel
accomplished

“Not really because it is just part of the school activity, but it may provide a sense of
accomplishment and effectiveness.”

Feel belong

“cooperating with others makes me belonged and accepted by the group.”

No

Like working
alone

“It doesn’t that’s why I prefer to do all myself.”

Feel shy

“I feel shy sometimes if I must cooperate with bigger people or more advanced in
knowledge because I feel like I have little or nothing to offer.”

The qualitative findings from the interviews
indicate a prevalent belief among female
adolescents

that

cooperation

significantly

enhances their self-esteem. The overwhelming
majority of

respondents expressed that

collaborative experiences foster self-confidence,

with one participant stating, “Yes, it does because

each time I cooperate, I always feel confident
especially when the outcome

is good.” This

sentiment aligns with existing literature that
highlights the positive effects of cooperative
learning on self-esteem. Research by Johnson and
Johnson (2009) supports the notion that
cooperative learning environments enhance self-
confidence. Their work illustrates that when

students collaborate, they not only achieve better
academic results but also develop stronger
interpersonal skills and a heightened sense of self-
worth. The shared success in cooperative tasks
reinforces individual contributions, thereby
fostering a sense of competence. Moreover, many
respondents noted that cooperation allowed them
to learn from peers with varying levels of
intelligence. Participants expressed sentiments

like, “Yes, it does because I cooperated with people

of different levels of intelligence and learn from

them.” This idea resonates with Vygotsky's (1978)

sociocultural theory, which emphasizes the role of
social interaction in cognitive development. By
engaging with diverse peers, students can enhance


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

69

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

their learning and self-perception, leading to
improved self-esteem through exposure to
different perspectives and problem-solving
approaches.

The theme of feeling valued emerged strongly,

with respondents stating, “Cooperation allows me

to leverage my knowledge and abilities to help
solve problems, which makes me feel useful and

valuable.” This aligns with Baumeister and Leary’s

(1995) theory of belongingness, which posits that
feeling valued and accepted within a group is
fundamental

to

psychological

well-being.

Cooperation fosters a sense of belonging,
reinforcing self-esteem as individuals feel their
contributions are important and appreciated.
Additionally, the sense of satisfaction derived from
cooperation was highlighted, with participants

noting, “When I

cooperate with others, I feel a

sense of satisfaction.” This finding is in line with

Ryan and Deci’s (2000) Self

-Determination

Theory, which suggests that satisfying the basic
psychological needs for competence, autonomy,
and relatedness enhances self-esteem and overall
well-being. Cooperation often fulfills these needs
by providing opportunities for individuals to
contribute meaningfully while also experiencing
support from peers. However, it is essential to note
that a minority of respondents indicated that
cooperation did not boost their self-esteem due to
shyness or a preference for solitary work.

Statements such as “I feel shy sometimes if I must

cooperate with bigger people or more advanced in
knowledge because I feel like I have little or
nothing to o

ffer” highlight the barriers some

individuals face. This aligns with findings from
Schunk (1991), who noted that self-efficacy beliefs
can be negatively impacted by comparison with
more skilled peers, potentially leading to feelings
of inadequacy.

Table 30:

Respondents’ Opinion How They Cooperate with Others in School

Themes

Quotations

Group work

“I take part in group works.”
‘I cooperate in doing group task with my friends and families.”
“Group activities.”
“By doing group task and attending tutorial classes and also contributing.”
‘Group works and meetings with others.”
“Group works and meetings with others.”
“I work with my friends and families and other groups in my areas.”
“I work together on group projects.”

Resolving
conflicts

“Provide advice on how to resolve conflicts and maintain a positive learning environment with
others.”

Attending tutorial

“I attend tutorials.”

Providing
information

“I provide information about different learning styles and methods, which can help teachers develop
strategies for promoting cooperation and collaboration in the classroom.”

Attending parties

I attend parties with friends and teachers”

Furthermore, interview discussion with few
respondents on how they cooperate with others in
school, many of them said they cooperate via group

work as depicted in the statements ‘I cooperate in
doing group task with my friends and families.”,
“Group activities.”, “By doing group task and

attending tutorial classes and also contributing.”

Furthermore, some said they cooperate in
resolving conflicts, during tutorials, during parties
and providing information as depicted in some

statement “I provide information abou

t different

learning styles and methods, which can help
teachers develop strategies for promoting


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

70

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

cooperation and collaboration in the classroom.”,
“Provide advice on how to resolve conflicts and

maintain a positive learning environment with

others” reflec

t a proactive approach to fostering a

positive learning environment. This aligns with the
findings of De Dreu and Weingart (2003), who
emphasize that effective conflict resolution within
groups can lead to enhanced cooperation and
improved group dynamics. Their research
suggests that when students are equipped with
conflict resolution strategies, they are more likely

to engage in constructive collaboration, which can
further support their academic and personal
development. Moreover, the ability to provide
advice on conflict resolution indicates that these
students are not only passive participants in
cooperative activities but are also taking initiative
to enhance their learning environments (Pruitt, &
Rubin, 2004). This active engagement can bolster
their self-esteem as they recognize their

contributions as valuable to the group’s success.

Table 31:

Respondents’ Opinion on Existence of Reciprocal Relationship during Cooperation

Existence of
reciprocal
relationship
during
cooperation

How

Themes

Quotations

Yes

Working for a
common goal

“Cooperation often involves a reciprocal relationship between the parties
involved. When people cooperate, they are working together towards a
common goal, which means they are both contributing and benefiting from the
relationship. This can include exchanging ideas, sharing resources, and
offering support to one another”
‘Yes of course because it is not a one-man show. It involves others so they
should be reciprocated actions.”

Gaining mutual
benefits

“Yes, there is because you do not work alone and there must be reciprocated
feelings.”
“Cooperation is a reciprocal relationship because both parties are giving and
receiving support, and both are benefiting from the relationship.”
“I think there is because cooperation is working with others so it must be
mutual.”

Sharing ideas

“We share ideas and contribute.”

Respecting each
other

“Yes, because we work as a team and must respect each other’s.”

Building trust and
mutual respect

“This reciprocal nature of cooperation is important because it helps to build
trust and mutual respect, which can lead to more effective collaboration and
stronger relationships.”

Furthermore, the respondents' emphasis on
mutual benefits resonates with the principles of
social exchange theory, which suggests that
relationships are based on the perceived costs and
benefits of interaction (Blau, 1964). As articulated

by one respondent, “Cooperation often involves a

reciprocal relationship between the parties
involved. When people cooperate, they are
working together towards a common goal, which

means they are both contributing and benefiting
from the relationship. This can include exchanging
ideas, sharing resources, and offering support to

one another.” This perspective indicates that

participants are aware of the value of their
contributions and the support they receive,
reinforcing the idea that cooperation enhances
their collective and individual outcomes.
Furthermore, reciprocal relationship was also


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

71

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

reported due to the fact of mutual benefits from all

participants as narrated “Cooperation is a

reciprocal relationship because both parties are
giving and receiving support, and both are

benefiting from the relationship.” Research by

Dillenbourg (1999) supports the importance of
reciprocal interactions in collaborative learning
environments. Dillenbourg argues that effective
cooperation involves not only sharing tasks but
also engaging in dialogue and reflection, which can
deepen understanding and foster a sense of
community among participants. This reciprocal
engagement can lead to higher levels of
satisfaction and greater self-esteem, as individuals
feel valued in their contributions to the group.
Finally, the emotional and social benefits derived
from reciprocal relationships in cooperative
settings cannot be overlooked. As noted by
Schutte, Malouff, Simunek, McKenley, & Hollander
(2001), the need to belong and feel valued is a
fundamental human motivation. When individuals
engage in reciprocal cooperation, they not only
achieve academic goals but also fulfill emotional
needs for connection and support. This dual
benefit reinforces the idea that cooperation is vital
for both personal and academic development.

Finally, sharing of ideas, respecting each other and
building trust and mutual respect were other

reasons advanced for the existence of reciprocal
relationship during cooperation as depicted in the

statement “This reciprocal nature of cooperation is

important because it helps to build trust and
mutual respect, which can lead to more effective

collaboration and stronger relationships.”, “Yes,

because we work as a team and must respect each

other’s.” Building trust and mutual respect is

foundational for effective cooperation. According
to Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman (1995), trust is a
critical factor in collaborative relationships,
influencing the willingness of individuals to engage
openly and share ideas. In cooperative settings,
when participants acknowledge and respect each
other's contributions, they create a safe
environment conducive to sharing knowledge and
experiences. Research by Costa and Anderson
(2011)

further

supports

this

notion,

demonstrating that trust among group members
enhances communication, reduces conflict, and
promotes collaborative behaviors. Their study
found that teams characterized by high levels of
trust are more likely to engage in constructive
dialogues and support one another, ultimately
leading to better outcomes. This highlights how the
development of trust and respect within
cooperative groups can significantly enhance the
efficacy of their collaborative efforts.

Table 32: Respondents’ Opinion How they Handel Conflict during Cooperation

Themes

Quotations

Building
communication
skills

“Provide information about different communication styles and how to handle.”
“Communication is the key, trying to understand each other.”
‘I can also offer a safe space for people to express their feelings and explore different ways to
resolve conflicts.”
“I communicate with others and express myself with the aim of making peace and not fight and
sometimes I let go of some careless problem which can destroy the group.”

Listening and
compromising

I suggest strategies for resolving conflicts, like active listening and compromise”

Acting objectively

“I avoid trouble as much as possible because I hate problems. So, when there’s conflict I think
and act objectively.”

Create room for
apologies

“I do not take shots from anyone if you are wrong, you do the right thing and I always apologize
and make peace.”

Respecting group
policies

“I make sure I follow the rules and regulations and avoid conflict as much as I can.”


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

72

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The findings from the interviews reveal that while
cooperation among female adolescents in state
universities in Cameroon is characterized by
mutual support and respect, conflicts inevitably
arise. Respondents emphasized that effective
conflict resolution strategies are essential to
ensure smooth cooperation, particularly through
the enhancement of communication skills.

Statements such as, “Provide information about

different communication styles and how to

handle,” and “Communication is the key, trying to

unde

rstand each other,” highlight the importance

of communication in navigating conflicts. Effective
communication is widely recognized as a critical
component of conflict resolution. According to
Fisher and Ury (2011), clear communication helps
to identify the underlying interests of all parties
involved in a conflict, facilitating a more
constructive dialogue. By focusing on building
communication skills, respondents acknowledged
that open discussions can help to clarify
misunderstandings

and

promote

mutual

understanding. This aligns with the assertion that

“I can also offer a safe space for people to express

their feelings and explore different ways to resolve

conflicts,” emphasizing the necessity of a

supportive

environment

for

effective

communication. Research by Jehn (1995) further
supports the idea that communication plays a vital
role in managing conflicts within groups. Jehn's
study indicates that groups that engage in open
communication are better equipped to address
conflicts constructively, leading to improved group
dynamics and performance. This reinforces the
notion that focusing on communication skills not
only aids in conflict resolution but also enhances
overall cooperation among group members.

Another strategy reported is adopting good

listening skills and compromising. The strategy of
active listening is crucial in conflict resolution, as it
encourages understanding and empathy among
group members. According to Brownell (2012),
active listening involves fully concentrating,
understanding, responding, and remembering
what is being said. By employing active listening,
individuals can validate each other's feelings and
perspectives, which is essential for resolving
misunderstandings and conflicts. One respondent

noted, “I suggest strategies for resol

ving conflicts,

like active listening and compromise,” highlighting

the recognition of these techniques as vital to
effective

collaboration.

Respondents

also

discussed the importance of acting objectively

during conflicts. One participant stated, “I avoid

trouble as much as possible because I hate

problems. So, when there’s conflict I think and act
objectively.” This approach aligns with the findings

of Van de Vliert (1997), who suggests that
objective thinking can help individuals detach
from emotional reactions and focus on facts and
common goals. By maintaining an objective
perspective, group members can evaluate
situations more clearly and make decisions that
are in the best interest of the group. The
willingness to apologize and create an
environment for reconciliation is vital in conflict
resolution. According to Schmitt et al. (2017),
apologies can facilitate forgiveness and restore
trust among group members. When one member
acknowledges their mistakes and expresses
remorse, it opens the door for healing and moving

forward. The statement, “I do not take shots from

anyone if you are wrong, you do the right thing and

I always apologize and make peace,” illustrates the

importance of accountability and humility in
fostering a cooperative atmosphere.

Table 33: Respondents’ Opinion if Cooperation Cultivate a Sense of Recognition and Validation

Themes

Quotations

Brings recognition

Yes, it does because other members notice and appreciate your work.”


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

73

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

It does bring recognition, but depending on the context and people you are working with.”
When you cooperate, your efforts are always appreciated.”
Yes, when people recognize and accept my ideas or point of view.”
“This recognition can take many forms, from verbal praise and appreciation to tangible rewards,
like bonuses or promotions.”

Develop sense of
accomplishment
and pride

Yes, cooperation can definitely cultivate a sense of recognition among the participants. When
people cooperate, they are often working together towards a common goal, and this shared effort
can lead to a sense of accomplishment and pride.”
“Cooperation can cultivate a sense of recognition because it allows people to contribute their skills
and knowledge towards a shared goal, which can lead to feelings of accomplishment and value.”

Building trust

It can also come in the form of increased trust and respect from colleagues, which can strengthen
relationships and improve teamwork.”

Finally, asking the respondents if cooperation
cultivate a sense of recognition and validation,
many of them said it brings recognition as depicted

in the statement, “Yes, when people recognize and
accept my ideas or point of view,” highlighting the

importance of acknowledgment in collaborative
settings.

Recognition

within

cooperative

environments is essential for fostering motivation
and enhancing self-worth. According to Deci and
Ryan (2000), recognition acts as a form of positive
reinforcement that can enhance intrinsic
motivation and encourage continued participation
in collaborative activities. When individuals feel
that their ideas and contributions are valued, it
reinforces their sense of belonging and importance
within the group. One respondent articulated this
sentiment by stating that recognition can come in
various forms, from verbal praise to tangible
rewards, which aligns with the findings of
Eisenberger and Cameron (1996) that suggest
external rewards can enhance intrinsic motivation
when used appropriately.

The respondents also expressed that cooperation
leads to a shared sense of accomplishment and

pride. As one participant noted, “When people

cooperate, they are often working together
towards a common goal, and this shared effort can
lead to a sens

e of accomplishment and pride.” This

reflects the concept of collective efficacy, which
Bandura (1997) describes as the shared belief in

the group’s ability to achieve goals. When

individuals work together successfully, their
collective achievements bolster their confidence
and foster a strong sense of pride in their
collaborative efforts. Furthermore, research by
Salas et al. (2015) emphasizes that teamwork and
collaboration can lead to improved performance
outcomes, which in turn enhance group members'
feelings of accomplishment. The authors highlight
that successful collaboration not only contributes
to task completion but also strengthens
interpersonal bonds among team members,
leading to a positive feedback loop of recognition
and motivation. Lastly, the aspect of trust building
was highlighted by respondents, with one stating,

“It can also come in the form of increased trust and
respect from colleagues.” Trust is a fundamental

component

of

effective

teamwork

and

collaboration. Research by Costa and Anderson
(2011) indicates that trust among team members
significantly enhances group dynamics and
performance. When individuals cooperate and

recognize each other’s contributions, it fosters an

atmosphere of mutual respect and trust, which is
essential for maintaining healthy relationships in
collaborative environments.

Verification of Hypothesis: There is no significant

relationship between female adolescent students’
cooperation and female adolescent students’ self

-

esteem in state universities in Cameroon.


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

74

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

Table 5: Relationship between Cooperation and Self-Esteem Development of Female Adolescent

Students

Cooperation

Self-esteem development of female adolescent

students

Spearman's rho

R-value

1

.466

**

p

-value

.

.000

n

703

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

The hypothetical statistics showed that there is a
significant and positive relationship between
cooperation and self-esteem development of
female adolescent students (R-value 0.466**, p-
value 0.000 < 0.05). The positive sign of the
correlation value denotes that self-esteem of the
female adolescent students increases with
increase in their ability to cooperate with others
and decreases with decrease in their ability to
cooperate with others. Thus, the null hypothesis
was rejected while the alternative hypothesis that
states there is a significant relationship between

female adolescent students’ cooperation and self

-

esteem of female adolescents’ students in state

universities in Cameroon was accepted. This
finding also tied with that of Slavin et al. (2014)
and in a meta-analysis by Wang et al. (2017) which
examined the effect of cooperative learning on self-
esteem among adolescent students across multiple
studies, the results showed that cooperative
learning had a significant positive effect on self-
esteem among adolescent students, with an
average effect size of 0.40. The authors suggest that
cooperative learning can enhance self-esteem by
providing opportunities for students to work
collaboratively, build positive relationships with
peers, and receive positive feedback and
recognition for their contributions. According to
Maslow theory of need (1962), it states that
humans are motivated to fulfill their needs in a
hierarchical order. This order begins with the most
basic needs before moving on to more advanced
needs. The ultimate goal according to this theory is

to reach the fifth level of the hierarchy which self-
actualization. However, to reach this level, there is
need for belongingness / social.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study indicate a significant and
positive relationship between cooperation and
self-esteem

development

among

female

adolescents in state universities in Cameroon. The
statistical analysis revealed that as the ability to
cooperate with peers increases, so does the self-
esteem of these students. This correlation suggests
that engaging in cooperative activities not only
enhances academic performance but also
contributes to a greater sense of self-worth and
validation

among

female

adolescents.

Furthermore, the importance of social interactions
in fostering self-esteem cannot be overstated.
Collaborative environments allow students to
share ideas, respect each other's contributions,
and develop a sense of belonging within their
academic communities. Such interactions are vital
for emotional growth, as they help individuals feel
valued and appreciated, which is essential for
building self-esteem. These dynamics reinforce the
notion that cooperation serves as a key factor in
the personal development of female students. In
light of these findings, it is crucial for educators
and policymakers to promote cooperative learning
strategies within academic settings. By creating
opportunities for female adolescents to engage in
collaborative tasks, institutions can significantly
enhance their self-esteem and overall well-being.


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

75

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

This approach not only supports academic success
but also fosters essential life skills and emotional
resilience, contributing to the holistic development
of female adolescents in Cameroon (Johnson &
Johnson, 2009).

Based on the findings of this study, it is
recommended that educational institutions in
Cameroon actively promote and implement
cooperative learning strategies within their
curricula.

Given

the

significant

positive

relationship between cooperation and the self-
esteem development of female adolescent
students, fostering collaborative environments can
greatly enhance both academic performance and
personal growth. Institutions should design group
activities that encourage peer interaction, idea
sharing, and mutual support. Training programs
for educators on the principles of cooperative
learning can also be beneficial, equipping them
with the tools to facilitate collaboration effectively.
Additionally, creating a culture that values
teamwork and recognizes individual contributions
will further enhance students' sense of belonging
and self-worth. Finally, ongoing assessment and
feedback mechanisms should be established to
monitor the impact of these cooperative initiatives
on self-esteem and overall student well-being. By
prioritizing cooperation in educational practices,
universities can contribute significantly to the
holistic development of female adolescents,
preparing them for both academic success and
positive social interactions in their future
endeavors.

REFERENCES

1.

Alesi, M. (2012). The role of the media in div
image concerns among women: A meta-
analysis of experimental and correlational
studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460-
476.

2.

Azzopardi PS, Hearps SJC, Francis KL, et al.
(2019) Progress in adolescent health and

wellbeing.

3.

Bailey, K. D. (2006). Methods of social research.
Free Press.

4.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise
of Control. W.H. Freeman.

5.

Barbara J. (2002). Media and Children's
Aggression, Fear, and Altruism". Children and
Electronic Media.and Contemporary Problems,
12, 1-15.

6.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The
Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal
Attachments as a Fundamental Human
Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3),
497-529.

7.

Billig, S. H. (2000). Experiential education and
the role of the teacher. In C. J. H. H. M. C. T. E. M.
D. (Eds.), Experiential learning: A best practice
handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 47-
55). Kogan Page.

8.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in
Social Life. Wiley.

9.

Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011).
Beyond peer influence: A review of the
developmental literature on peer engagement
and socialization. Developmental Review,
31(3),

307-347.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.003

10.

Brownell, J. (2012). Listening: Attitudes,
Principles, and Skills. Pearson Higher Ed.

11.

Bulanda, J. R., & Majumdar, D. (2009).
Parenting and adolescent self-esteem: The role
of gender and family structure. Journal of
Youth and Adolescence, 38(6), 797-807.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9275-3

12.

Clay, D. L., McCarthy, A., & O'Brien, S. (2005).
The impact of emotional intelligence on
academic success. Journal of Education and
Learning,

41(2),

85-98.

https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v4n2p85


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

76

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

13.

Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2011).
Measuring Trust in Teams: Development and
Validation of a Trust Scale for Teams. Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
84(2), 321-347.

14.

Cropanzano, R., & Byrne, Z. S. (2000). The role
of affect in the workplace. In N. M. Ashkanasy,
C. E. J. Härtel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in
the workplace: Research, theory, and practice
(pp. 9-43). Information Age Publishing.

15.

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task
Versus

Relationship

Conflict,

Team

Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction:
A

Meta-Analysis.

Journal

of

Applied

Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.

16.

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Assessment of
intercultural competence as a student outcome
of internationalization. Journal of Studies in
International Education, 10(3), 241-266.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306284530

17.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What"
and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and
the

Self-Determination

of

Behavior.

Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

18.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative Learning:
Cognitive and Computational Approaches. In P.
Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning:
Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp.
1-19). Elsevier.

19.

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in
Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and
Implications for Research and Practice. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.

20.

Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A.
(2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon &
R. M. Lerner

21.

Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996).
Diminished Intrinsic Interest in Activity
Following Unexpected Reward: A Confounding

Effect of Reward Context. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 489-
500.

22.

Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003).
Counting Blessings Versus Burdens: An
Experimental Investigation of Gratitude and
Subjective Well-Being in Daily Life. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377-
389.

23.

Feldman, D. C. (2012). Careers and career
management. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook
of industrial and organizational psychology
(Vol. 1, pp. 329-362). American Psychological
Association.

24.

Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). Getting to Yes:
Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In.
Penguin Books.

25.

Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., &
Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review
of the effectiveness of peer-mediated
interventions in school settings. School
Psychology

Quarterly,

21(1),

1-16.

https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088268

26.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence:
Why it can matter more than IQ.

27.

Harker, L. (2012). Social support and
adolescent

development.

Journal

of

Adolescence,

35(3),

657-668.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.1
0.003

28.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis
of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to
Achievement. Routledge.

29.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based
learning: What and how do students learn?
Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 15-24.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_
3

30.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

77

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

laboratory in science education: Foundations
for the twenty-first century. Science Education,
88(1),

28-54.

https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20025

31.

Howe, K. R., & Abedin, M. (2013). The role of
the researcher in qualitative research: A
phenomenological approach. Educational
Researcher,

42(4),

215-223.

https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X1348712
2

32.

Jehn, K. A. (1995). A Multidimensional Theory
of Conflict in Work Groups. In C. K. W. De Dreu
& E. van de Vliert (Eds.), Using Conflict in
Organizations (pp. 3-15). Sage.

33.

Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2003).
The role of special education in the prevention
of academic failure. Learning Disabilities
Research

&

Practice,

18(1),

27-35.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00053

34.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An
Educational Psychology Success Story: Social
Interdependence Theory and Cooperative
Learning. Educational Psychologist, 44(2),
100-110.

35.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013).
Cooperative learning: Improving university
instruction by basing practice on validated
theory. Journal of Excellence in College
Teaching, 25(3), 3-26.

36.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014).
Cooperative Learning in 21st Century. Anales
de Psicología, 30(3), 841-851.

37.

Keramati, M.R. (2012) The Relation between
Tea

chers’ Per

-ception of School Atmosphere

and Their Occupational Stress

38.

Kruk, M. (2004). The impact of aging on health
care: The case for health promotion. Health
Promotion International, 19(3), 251-258.
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dah207

39.

Laible, D. J., & Song, S. (2000). The role of
attachment in the development of social
competence. Child Development, 71(5), 1200-
1214.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-

8624.00232

40.

Laible, D. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2004).
Attachment and emotional understanding in
preschool

children.

Developmental

Psychology,

40(5),

811-820.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.811

41.

Maria, A. (2020). The impact of social media on
youth mental health. Journal of Adolescent
Health,

67(5),

651-655.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05
.005

42.

Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Academic
Self-Concept: Beyond the Dark Side of Self-
Esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Self-Esteem
Issues and Answers: A Sourcebook of Current
Perspectives. Psychology Press.

43.

Marsh, H. W., & O'Mara, A. (2008). The impact
of school climate on student engagement and
achievement.

Journal

of

Educational

Psychology,

100(3),

641-653.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-
0663.100.3.641

44.

Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of
being. D. Van Nostrand Company.

45.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D.
(1995). An integrative model of organizational
trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3),
709-734.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.95080803
35

46.

McCullough, M. E., et al. (2020). Mentoring and
Self-Esteem in Young Women: A Longitudinal
Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
49(5), 1047-1060.

47.

Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., Leroy, C., & Roy, E.


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

78

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

(2007). Psychometric evaluation of the Trait
Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire: Factor
structure, reliability, and validity. Journal of
Personality Assessment, 89(3), 249-259.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0022389070146858
1

48.

Newman, T. P., Bender, K., & Mowery, K.
(2007). The role of social support in the
development of adolescent self-esteem.
Adolescent & Family Health, 4(2), 95-101.

49.

Nyangweso, P. (2018). Gender Roles and Self-
Esteem Among Adolescents in Cameroon.
Journal of Gender Studies, 27(3), 267-280.

50.

Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students' need for
belonging in the school community. Review of
Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307000332
3

51.

Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Bean, R. A. (2009). The
role of parental support in promoting
adolescent well-being. Journal of Family
Psychology,

23(4),

575-584.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016167

52.

Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (2004). Negotiation
in Social Conflict. McGraw-Hill.

53.

Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Digital equity
and the role of technology in education.
Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 1-10.

54.

Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of
sex differences in interpersonal conflict and
aggression: A developmental perspective.
Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 75-106.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.75

55.

Rosenberg, M. (2011). Self-esteem issues and
answers:

A

sourcebook

of

current

perspectives. Taylor & Francis.

56.

Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.
(2008).

Promoting

early

adolescents'

achievement and peer relationships: The

effects of cooperative, competitive, and
individualistic goal structures. Psychology in
the

Schools,

45(7),

708-724.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20334

57.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-
Determination Theory and the Facilitation of
Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and
Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-
78.

58.

Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2015). On
Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance:
Discoveries and Developments. Human
Factors, 57(3), 1-13.

59.

Schmitt, M., et al. (2017). Apologies and
Forgiveness: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 58-
75.

60.

Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and
Academic

Motivation.

Educational

Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231.

61.

Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Simunek, M.,
McKenley, J., & Hollander, S. (2001). Emotional
Intelligence and Interpersonal Relations. The
Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 523-536.

62.

Simsek, H. (2013). The relationship between
emotional intelligence and leadership styles: A
study on managers. International Journal of
Business and Social Science, 4(5), 186-194.

63.

Slavin, R. E. (2014). Educational psychology:
Theory and practice. Pearson.

64.

Smith, S. W., & Hamon, R. R. (2012). Exploring
family theories. Oxford University Press.

65.

Spencer, K. (2010). The role of peer
relationships in adolescent development.
Journal of Adolescence, 33(2), 161-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.0
6.003

66.

Swanson, D. P., Edwards, L. M., & Spencer, K.
(2010). The impact of social support on


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

79

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

adolescent development. Journal of Youth and
Adolescence,

39(8),

1049-1062.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9494-4

67.

Tajfel, H. (1970). The theory of self-
categorization. In Tanhaye reshvanloo F,
Keramati R, Saadati A. Selfesteem among
female adolescences.

68.

Tchombe, T. M., & Lo-oh, E. (2012). The role of
emotional intelligence in academic success: A
study of university students. International
Journal of Humanities and Social Science,
2(14), 198-203.

69.

Thomas, K. W. (2000). Intrinsic motivation at
work: Building energy and commitment.
Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

70.

Tjosvold, D. (1998). Cooperative and
Competitive Goal Approaches to Conflict:
Theory and Practice. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E.
van de Vliert (Eds.), Using Conflict in
Organizations (pp. 125-145). Sage.

71.

Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer-assisted
learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-
645.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341050034517
2

72.

Turner, J. C., Tharp, R. G., & Meyer, F. (2010).
The role of social identity in the development
of social skills. Journal of Educational
Psychology,

102(2),

361-375.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018900

73.

Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Dynamic Conflict
Management: The Theory and Practice of
Conflict

Resolution

in

Organizations.

Psychology Press.

74.

Van Vugt, M., & Hart, C. M. (2004). Social
identification and social influence in groups:
The importance of group norms. European
Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 249-263.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.195

75.

Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M., & Pruyn, A.
(2000). From in-group favoritism to out-group
discrimination: A social identity perspective.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(3),
305-317.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200033005

76.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The
Development

of

Higher

Psychological

Processes. Harvard University Press.

77.

Wang, M. T., Degol, J. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2017).
Trajectories of school engagement from
middle to high school: The role of parental
involvement.

Journal

of

Youth

and

Adolescence,

46(4),

746-763.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0574-2

78.

Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003).
Promoting collaborative dialogue in the
classroom: A study of the impact of peer
collaboration.

Journal

of

Educational

Psychology,

95(1),

121-129.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.121

79.

Weber, M., Ruch, W., & Koller, O. (2004). The
role of character strengths in the prediction of
life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies,
5(2),

171-193.

https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JHES.0000040980
.58657.4b

References

Alesi, M. (2012). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460-476.

Azzopardi PS, Hearps SJC, Francis KL, et al. (2019) Progress in adolescent health and wellbeing.

Bailey, K. D. (2006). Methods of social research. Free Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman.

Barbara J. (2002). Media and Children's Aggression, Fear, and Altruism". Children and Electronic Media.and Contemporary Problems, 12, 1-15.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.

Billig, S. H. (2000). Experiential education and the role of the teacher. In C. J. H. H. M. C. T. E. M. D. (Eds.), Experiential learning: A best practice handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 47-55). Kogan Page.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley.

Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond peer influence: A review of the developmental literature on peer engagement and socialization. Developmental Review, 31(3), 307-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.003

Brownell, J. (2012). Listening: Attitudes, Principles, and Skills. Pearson Higher Ed.

Bulanda, J. R., & Majumdar, D. (2009). Parenting and adolescent self-esteem: The role of gender and family structure. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(6), 797-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9275-3

Clay, D. L., McCarthy, A., & O'Brien, S. (2005). The impact of emotional intelligence on academic success. Journal of Education and Learning, 41(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v4n2p85

Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2011). Measuring Trust in Teams: Development and Validation of a Trust Scale for Teams. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 321-347.

Cropanzano, R., & Byrne, Z. S. (2000). The role of affect in the workplace. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. J. Härtel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 9-43). Information Age Publishing.

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306284530

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp. 1-19). Elsevier.

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.

Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner

Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Diminished Intrinsic Interest in Activity Following Unexpected Reward: A Confounding Effect of Reward Context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 489-500.

Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting Blessings Versus Burdens: An Experimental Investigation of Gratitude and Subjective Well-Being in Daily Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377-389.

Feldman, D. C. (2012). Careers and career management. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 329-362). American Psychological Association.

Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.

Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of peer-mediated interventions in school settings. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088268

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ.

Harker, L. (2012). Social support and adolescent development. Journal of Adolescence, 35(3), 657-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.10.003

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_3

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20025

Howe, K. R., & Abedin, M. (2013). The role of the researcher in qualitative research: A phenomenological approach. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13487122

Jehn, K. A. (1995). A Multidimensional Theory of Conflict in Work Groups. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. van de Vliert (Eds.), Using Conflict in Organizations (pp. 3-15). Sage.

Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2003). The role of special education in the prevention of academic failure. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00053

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 100-110.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3), 3-26.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative Learning in 21st Century. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 841-851.

Keramati, M.R. (2012) The Relation between Teachers’ Per-ception of School Atmosphere and Their Occupational Stress

Kruk, M. (2004). The impact of aging on health care: The case for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 19(3), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dah207

Laible, D. J., & Song, S. (2000). The role of attachment in the development of social competence. Child Development, 71(5), 1200-1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00232

Laible, D. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2004). Attachment and emotional understanding in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 811-820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.811

Maria, A. (2020). The impact of social media on youth mental health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(5), 651-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.005

Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Academic Self-Concept: Beyond the Dark Side of Self-Esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Self-Esteem Issues and Answers: A Sourcebook of Current Perspectives. Psychology Press.

Marsh, H. W., & O'Mara, A. (2008). The impact of school climate on student engagement and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 641-653. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.641

Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. D. Van Nostrand Company.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

McCullough, M. E., et al. (2020). Mentoring and Self-Esteem in Young Women: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(5), 1047-1060.

Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., Leroy, C., & Roy, E. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(3), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701468581

Newman, T. P., Bender, K., & Mowery, K. (2007). The role of social support in the development of adolescent self-esteem. Adolescent & Family Health, 4(2), 95-101.

Nyangweso, P. (2018). Gender Roles and Self-Esteem Among Adolescents in Cameroon. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(3), 267-280.

Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003323

Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Bean, R. A. (2009). The role of parental support in promoting adolescent well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(4), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016167

Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (2004). Negotiation in Social Conflict. McGraw-Hill.

Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Digital equity and the role of technology in education. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 1-10.

Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in interpersonal conflict and aggression: A developmental perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 75-106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.75

Rosenberg, M. (2011). Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives. Taylor & Francis.

Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychology in the Schools, 45(7), 708-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20334

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2015). On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments. Human Factors, 57(3), 1-13.

Schmitt, M., et al. (2017). Apologies and Forgiveness: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 58-75.

Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and Academic Motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231.

Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Simunek, M., McKenley, J., & Hollander, S. (2001). Emotional Intelligence and Interpersonal Relations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 523-536.

Simsek, H. (2013). The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership styles: A study on managers. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(5), 186-194.

Slavin, R. E. (2014). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson.

Smith, S. W., & Hamon, R. R. (2012). Exploring family theories. Oxford University Press.

Spencer, K. (2010). The role of peer relationships in adolescent development. Journal of Adolescence, 33(2), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.06.003

Swanson, D. P., Edwards, L. M., & Spencer, K. (2010). The impact of social support on adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(8), 1049-1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9494-4

Tajfel, H. (1970). The theory of self-categorization. In Tanhaye reshvanloo F, Keramati R, Saadati A. Selfesteem among female adolescences.

Tchombe, T. M., & Lo-oh, E. (2012). The role of emotional intelligence in academic success: A study of university students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(14), 198-203.

Thomas, K. W. (2000). Intrinsic motivation at work: Building energy and commitment. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Tjosvold, D. (1998). Cooperative and Competitive Goal Approaches to Conflict: Theory and Practice. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. van de Vliert (Eds.), Using Conflict in Organizations (pp. 125-145). Sage.

Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer-assisted learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172

Turner, J. C., Tharp, R. G., & Meyer, F. (2010). The role of social identity in the development of social skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 361-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018900

Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Dynamic Conflict Management: The Theory and Practice of Conflict Resolution in Organizations. Psychology Press.

Van Vugt, M., & Hart, C. M. (2004). Social identification and social influence in groups: The importance of group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.195

Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M., & Pruyn, A. (2000). From in-group favoritism to out-group discrimination: A social identity perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(3), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200033005

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, M. T., Degol, J. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2017). Trajectories of school engagement from middle to high school: The role of parental involvement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 746-763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0574-2

Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom: A study of the impact of peer collaboration. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.121

Weber, M., Ruch, W., & Koller, O. (2004). The role of character strengths in the prediction of life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JHES.0000040980.58657.4b