Authors

  • SOPHIE ENJEMA MBUA
    Department of Educational Foundations and Administration, Faculty of Education of the University of Buea, Cameroon.
  • PROF. JOSEPH BESONG BESONG
    Department of Educational Foundations and Administration, Faculty of Education of the University of Buea, Cameroon.
  • DR. MEKOLLE PROSPER MBELLE
    Department of Educational Foundations and Administration, Faculty of Education of the University of Buea, Cameroon.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume07Issue03-03

Keywords:

Teaching methods self-reliance graduates Anglo-Saxon universities in Cameroon

Abstract

The study investigated the impact of teaching methods on self-reliance graduates from Anglo-Saxon universities in Cameroon. The objective of the study was to investigate the extent to which teaching methods impact self-reliance among graduates from Anglo-Saxon universities in Cameroon. The study adopted the survey research design using quantitative and qualitative approaches.  Questionnaire were designed for lecturers, graduates and university administrators. Data were collected from three hundred (300) lecturers, two hundred and eighty (280) graduates and sixteen (16) university administrators from both university of Buea and Bamenda respectively. The data from close-ended questions were analysed with the aid of descriptive and inferential statistical tools, while the open-ended questions was analysed thematically. The Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was used to test the research hypotheses formulated in the study. The findings revealed that teaching methods significantly enhance self-reliance of graduates from Anglo-Saxon Universities in Cameroon, as indicated by a positive correlation coefficient of 0.310. Based on these findings, it was recommended that sufficient and up to date educational resources should be provided to lecturers and students to support effective teaching and learning. In addition, innovative teaching methods with opportunities for practicals to be adopted by lecturers in order to contribute significantly to the academic growth and development of graduates.


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

12

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

TYPE

Original Research

PAGE NO.

12-23

DOI

10.37547/tajssei/Volume07Issue03-03



OPEN ACCESS

SUBMITED

22 January 2025

ACCEPTED

20 February 2025

PUBLISHED

26 March 2025

VOLUME

Vol.07 Issue03 2025

CITATION

SOPHIE ENJEMA MBUA, PROF. JOSEPH BESONG BESONG, & DR.
MEKOLLE PROSPER MBELLE. (2025). The Impact of Teaching Methods on
Self-Reliance Among Graduates from Anglo-Saxon Universities in Cameroon.
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 7(03),
12

23. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume07Issue03-03

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.

The Impact of Teaching
Methods on Self-Reliance
Among Graduates from
Anglo-Saxon Universities
in Cameroon

SOPHIE ENJEMA MBUA

Department of Educational Foundations and Administration, Faculty of
Education of the University of Buea, Cameroon.

PROF. JOSEPH BESONG BESONG

Department of Educational Foundations and Administration, Faculty of
Education of the University of Buea, Cameroon.

DR. MEKOLLE PROSPER MBELLE

Department of Educational Foundations and Administration, Faculty of
Education of the University of Buea, Cameroon.

Abstract:

The study investigated the impact of teaching

methods on self-reliance graduates from Anglo-Saxon
universities in Cameroon. The objective of the study was
to investigate the extent to which teaching methods
impact self-reliance among graduates from Anglo-Saxon
universities in Cameroon. The study adopted the survey
research design using quantitative and qualitative
approaches. Questionnaire were designed for lecturers,
graduates and university administrators. Data were
collected from three hundred (300) lecturers, two
hundred and eighty (280) graduates and sixteen (16)
university administrators from both university of Buea
and Bamenda respectively. The data from close-ended
questions were analysed with the aid of descriptive and
inferential statistical tools, while the open-ended
questions was analysed thematically. The Pearson
product moment correlation coefficient was used to
test the research hypotheses formulated in the study.
The findings revealed that teaching methods
significantly enhance self-reliance of graduates from
Anglo-Saxon Universities in Cameroon, as indicated by a
positive correlation coefficient of 0.310. Based on these
findings, it was recommended that sufficient and up to
date educational resources should be provided to
lecturers and students to support effective teaching and
learning. In addition, innovative teaching methods with
opportunities for practicals to be adopted by lecturers


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

13

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

in order to contribute significantly to the academic
growth and development of graduates.

Keywords:

Teaching methods, self-reliance, graduates,

Anglo-Saxon universities in Cameroon.

Introduction:

University graduates are expected to

show proof of acquisition of both hard and soft skills
such as critical thinking, problem-solving, teamwork
and flexibility, communication skills, creativity and
technology literacy, leadership, time management and
decision-making

skills,

Human

relation

skills

entrepreneurial

skills. Teaching

methods

are

important tools available to the teacher, whose
knowledge and use depends to the efficiency of
educational work. Tanyi (2006) and Fonkeng (2007)
lamented that the policies on the orientation of Higher
Education to promote professionalisation and enhance
graduates skills acquisition lack the supporting
resources and faces a lot of challenges for its
implementation.

The implications are much heavy on the nation’s

economic cost which involve reduction in gross
domestic product of any nation, reduction in economic
welfare, reduction in output and erosion of human
capital. Furthermore, since graduates are unable to
secure jobs due to insufficient skills acquisition, it has
led to severe financial hardship, poverty, debt,
homelessness and housing stress, family tensions and
breakdown, boredom, alienation, shame and stigma,
increased social isolation, crime, erosion of confidence
and self-esteem. In order for graduates to be self-
reliant, universities have to upgraded by using
innovative teaching methods as this may enable
graduates to gain diverse skills for the job market.

LITERATURE

Teaching Methods and Self-Reliance

Teaching is the fundamental art and science guiding
the management and strategies used for lesson
delivery in the classroom. Dorgu (2015) defined
teaching method as the strategy by which a teacher
delivers his or her subject matter to the learners, based
on predetermined instructional objectives in order to
promote learning in the students. Westwood (2008)
sees teaching methods as comprising the principles
and methods used by teachers to enable students
learning. These definitions reveal that teaching has

principles and methods meant to maximise students’

learning.

According to UNICEF (2010), teaching and learning

about life skills require interactive, student-centred
methods. According to Hammond (2010), teachers
should exercise professionalisation in teaching and
classroom control. A qualified teacher has mastery of
subject matter and pedagogy which facilitate learning.
To Josephine and Amukowa (2013), the root of qualify
education is a quality teacher, and stakeholders may
advocate for a student-centred approach with all might
and passion. The teaching learning process requires
appropriate approaches to teaching (Chunga, 2013). In
this regard, teachers must know which strategy is better
for students learning, when and varied their teaching
methods.

There are various teaching methods that can be used in
higher education. Omari (2015) identified the following
teaching methods: Lecture method, Problem-centred,
Project, Role play/social drama, Audio-visual and film,
Discussion,

Practical/laboratory,

Individual

task,

Syndicate, Demonstration methods. Other researchers
(Nilson, 2010; Cruichshank et al, 2006; Balan &
Metcalfe, 2012; as well as Sajjad, 2011), also identified
the following teaching methods: Lecture, Discussion,
Brainstorming, Case study, Group work, Questioning,
Problem- based learning, Discovery learning methods.

Moore (2001), identifies methods of teaching in learner-
centred institution as follows; discussion, cooperative
learning, discovery learning, inquiring learning,
simulation, games and individualized instructions.
Tambo (2003) categorised the above methods into four
broad categories. There is indirect teaching which
involves students in investigating, drawing inferences
from data and forming hypotheses. Interactive teaching
which includes discussion and cooperative learning is
another category. There is also independent study
which is a range of teaching methods that are planned
and provided to foster the development of initiative,
self-reliance and self-improvement of students as
individuals.

According to Longanever (2003), quality education is
based on the teaching methods than what students
learn. Barneh and Coate (2005) have argued that higher
education curriculum in Cameroon has not received as
much attention as should be expected for a concept that
underpins

university

teaching

and

learning.

Professionalisation calls for student-centred teaching
which is a constructivist approach where the role of the
teacher is a facilitator (Alesandrini and Larson, 2002),
helps students acquire knowledge through activities,
internship and practicals are good examples and
internships are linked between theoretical knowledge
and concepts learned in the classroom setting. Thus,
enable students to acquire skills necessary for self-
reliance.


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

14

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

Barrow and Lec (2006) mentioned that, effective
teaching means practice. The collaborative approach is

one of those strategies that meet students’ needs

through a relationship where students receive support
and encouragement from their teachers. Through
collaboration and corporation with others, students
engage in experimental learning that is authentic and
holistic. Teachers are also challenged to explore other
methods to achieve results irrespective of religion,
culture, or belief. According to UNESCO (2004), what
goes into the classroom, and the impact of the teacher
and teaching, has been identified in numerous studies
as the crucial variable for improving learning
outcomes. Engaging students in practical activities
tends to give them the opportunity to apply classroom
knowledge in a real world or practical situation and this
has the potential to prepare them for life after studies.
This is the moment for real change in our higher
education system by revitalising their curriculum to
en

hance graduates’ prospects for employment and

self-reliance.

Butcher et al (2011) said that, the best way to get
started is by enhancing curriculum of higher education
academic programs. In practice, universities interact
with socio-professional actors thr

ough students’

internship, university hosted business forums,
research and teaching collaborations. However, these
interactions may seem to be at its infancy and the full
benefits are yet to be seen. The basic assumption of
policy makers is that, higher education ought to play a
decisive role in the society and contribute to
sustainable growth and job creation (Com, 2011).
Therefore, higher education institutions should be
aware of the needs of the economy and subsequently
adjust their curriculum to ensure greater compatibility.

Eliezer (2016) carried out a study on “Effect on
Teaching Approaches and Methods on Students’

Learning outcomes in institutions of Higher Education

in Rwanda”. The purpose of the study was to access the

quality of teaching and assessment practices and to

establish their effects on students’ learning out comes

in Higher Education Institutions in Rwanda. The study
had three specific objectives; the qualitative and
quantitative were used involving survey and content
analysis designs. The study was conducted in four
institutions with a sample of twelve (12) lecturers and
seventy-two (72) students. The researcher used a
questionnaire, observation, documentary analysis and
interview guide. The findings reveals that 91.7% of
students adopted surface approach of learning and
79.2% of students testing the high cognitive process
adopted deep approach to learning. To address this
problem, higher education needs to ensure retraining

of lecturers in teaching methods and establish
appropriate mechanisms of following up the teaching
practices.

Kebby (2014) carried out a study on “Effective Teaching

Methods in Higher Education. The purpose of the study
was to determine the effective methods of teaching at
higher levels of education. The study was to find out
how lecturers figured out methods of teaching as one
planned a lesson prior to teaching. Three research
questions guided this study. The instruments used for
this study were interview guide, questionnaire and
observation. The study used the convenience sampling/
non-probability sampling techniques. The result
revealed that 71.7% population were not aware of their
individual learning styles, only 28.3% of students were
aware of their individual learning styles.

Ugwunwoti et al; (2017) also carried out a study on

“Improving

Entrepreneurship

Education

Among

Business Education Students of Universities in South
East, Nigeria for Self-

Reliance in a Depressed Economy”.

The purpose of the study was to determine the
strategies for improving entrepreneurship education
among business education students of universities in
South East of Nigeria for self-reliance in a depressed
economy. The study was guided by two research
questions and two null hypotheses in line with the
purpose of the study. The study adopted a survey
research design. And the instrument that was used for
data collection was questionnaire and the instrument
was structured using four (4) point rating scale. The
reliability of the study was determined using Cronbach
Alpha. The result of the reliability test yielded 0.78
showing that the instrument was reliable. Mean and
standard deviation was used to answer the research
questions and T-test statistics was used to test the two
null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance.

Alake et al; (2015) carried

out research on “Comparative

study of students’ enrollment, resource availability and

utilization in private and state-owned universities in

Ogun state”, with the view of establishing probable

variations in the institutions. Descriptive survey
research design was adopted. The purposive sampling
technique was used to sample students from both
universities. Instruments used to collect data were
checklist and questionnaire and the formulated
statement of hypotheses were analyzed using T-test and
Pearson product moment correlation statistical tools at
0.05 level of significance. The study recommended that
university education needs more funds from both
government and private individuals, university
management teams are to take adequate caution in the
management and maintenance of universities physical
and infrastructural facilities.


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

15

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

Also, a study carried out by Endeley, (2014) on
Professionalisation of Higher Education: Assessing
Teaching and Learning within the framework of the
BMP in university of Buea. The study adopted a
descriptive survey with a purposive sample of forty
(40) lecturers from the university of Buea. A closed-
ended questionnaire was constructed and was rated
on a four-point likert scale. The instrument was
validated by eight (8) lecturers and the validity index
stood at 0.86. Data was analyzed using the SPSS
Package. Findings reveals insufficient human and
material resources while the teaching activities and
assessment averagely reflect professionalization. The
pedagogic aspects of professionalization need more
attention.

Objective

To investigate the extent to which teaching methods
influence self-reliance of graduates from Anglo-Saxon
universities in Cameroon.

Research Question

How do teaching methods influence the self-reliance of
graduates from Anglo-Saxon universities in Cameroon?

Hypotheses

Ho

1

:

Teaching methods do not significantly enhance

self-reliance of graduates from Anglo-Saxon universities
in Cameroon.

Ha

2

:

Teaching methods significantly enhance self-

reliance of graduates from Anglo-Saxon universities in
Cameroon.

METHODS AND PROCEDURE

This study adopted the descriptive and correlational
survey design using quantitative and qualitative
approaches. The accessible population consisted of
three hundred (300) lecturers from both universities,
twenty (20) university administrators and finally Two
hundred (200) graduates from the universities of Buea
and Bamenda as seen on table 1 below:

Table 1: - Distribution of Accessible Population of the Study by Establishment

Institution

Academic Staff

Graduates

University of Buea

593

1923

University of Bamenda

421

224

Total

1014

2147

Source: Statistics from 2017-2021 (IT Centre)

The table above shows that there are 1014 academic
staff and 2147 graduates from the university of Buea
and Bamenda.

Instruments for Data Collection: The instruments that
were used for data collection were the questionnaire
for lecturers and graduates while interview guide for
administrators. The purposive sampling technique was
used to select lecturers and the two universities (Buea
and Bamenda) and the snow ball sampling technique
was used to select graduates. The sample size
consisted three hundred (300) lecturers, two hundred
and

eighty

(280)

graduates,

sixteen

(16)

administrators. The faculties involved in the sample
includes: University of Buea; Faculty of Arts, Faculty of
Education, Advanced School of Translation and
Interpretation, and College of Technology, and the
University of Bamenda; College of Technology, Faculty
of Arts, Faculty of Education, and Faculty of Economic
and Management Sciences.

The reliability of the instruments was established based
on a pilot study of five (5) lecturers, five (5) university
administrators and five (5) graduates from the
university of Buea and the university of Bamenda. The

Cronbach’s Alpha was used to test the reliability of the

instrument. The reliability co-efficient calculated ranged
from 0.78 to 0.89 for the variables under study. For the
qualitative instrument, 3 lecturers each were selected
from the universities to respond to the interview guide
questions and the responses were examined. The self-
delivery method was used to administer the
instruments with the help of research assistant. The
instruments were administered and collected on the
spot. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics
(frequencies and percentage counts) and inferential
statistics of Pearson Correlation Coefficient. Pearson
product-moment correlation coefficient was used to
test the research hypotheses formulated in the study.

Demographic Characteristics of Respondent


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

16

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

The respondents were required to provide data on the
following parameters: Gender, longevity in service and
highest education qualification. The analysis of

demographic data is presented below using frequency
table and percentages

Table 2: - Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents

Parameter
s

University
Administrators

Lecturers

Graduates

Gender

Frequen
cy

Percentage Frequen

cy

Percenta
ge

Frequen
cy

Percenta
ge

Male

10

62.5

150

50

132

47.14

Female

06

37.5

150

50

148

52.86

Total

16

100

300

100

280

100

Longevity

Frequen
cy

Percentage Frequen

cy

Percenta
ge

Frequen
cy

Percenta
ge

>2 Years

0

0

-

-

-

-

3-5 years

06

37.5

-

-

-

-

6-7 years

08

50.0

-

-

-

-

>8 years

02

12.5

-

-

-

-

Total

16

100

-

-

-

-

Qualificati
on

Frequen
cy

Percentage Frequen

cy

Percenta
ge

Frequen
cy

Percenta
ge

Masters

02

12.5

-

-

-

-

PhD

Total
University

Buea
Bamenda

Total
Faculty

FED
FA
ASTI
COT
FEMS

Total
Departme
nts

HIS
ENG
EDL
SPE
TRA
INE
CET
EET
ACC
BNF

14

16
Frequen
cy

08
08

16
Frequen
cy

04
04
02
04
02

16
Frequen
cy

02
02
02
02
01
01
02
02
01
01

87.5

100
Percentage

50
50

100
Percentage

25.0
25.0
12.5
25.0
12.5

100
Percentage

12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
6.25
6.25
12.5
12.5
6.25
6.25

-
-

Frequen
cy

200
100

300
Frequen
cy

75
75
50
75
25

100
Frequen
cy

40
35
25
50
25
25
35
40
13
12

-
-

Percenta
ge

66.67
33.33

100
Percenta
ge

25.0
25.0
16.67
25.0
8.33

100
Percenta
ge

13.33
11.67
8.33
16.67
8.33
8.33
11.67
13.33
4.33
4.00

-
-

Frequen
cy

184
96

280
Frequen
cy

70
70
46
70
24

280
Frequen
cy
35

35
35
35
23
23
35
35
12
12

-
-

Percenta
ge

65.71
34.29

100
Percenta
ge

25.0
25.0
16.43
25.0
8.57

100
Percenta
ge

12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
8.21
8.21
12.5
12.5
4.21
4.21

Total

16

100

300

100

280

100

Source: Researcher’s Field work August, 2024.


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

17

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

As seen in table 2 above, ten male and six universities
administrators responded to the interview guides
given a percentage of 62.5% and 37.5% respectively.
This shows that there are more male universities
administrators than female universities administrators
in the sample drawn from Anglo Saxon Universities in
Cameroon.

Similarly, there were equal male and female lecturers
who respondent to the questionnaires given a sampled
of one hundred and fifty each with a percentage of 50%
each. There were also one hundred and thirty-two
male graduates and one hundred and forty-eight
female graduates given a percentage of 47.14% and
52.86%

respectively

used

to

complete

the

questionnaire. This gender data revealed that there
were more women graduates in Anglo-Saxon
universities in Cameroon than men.

Longevity in service ranges from 12.5% to 50% for the
university administrators. The highest numbers of
universities administrators have served between 6-7
years in their respective Universities and a few have
served above 8 years. This implies, the respondents
have the experience to assess the level of
professionalization and self-reliance of graduates in
their respective universities.

The table also revealed that a percentage of 12.5% of

universities administrators hold Master’s Degree as

their qualification, with 87.5% administrators holding
PhD. This implies that most of the Universities
administrators are qualified in the irrespective domain.

In addition, 50% each of university administrators were
selected from University of Buea and University of
Bamenda. 66.67% of lecturers were selected from the
University of Buea and 33.33% of lecturers were
selected from the University of Bamenda. 65.71% of
graduates were also selected from the University of
Buea and 34.29% of graduates were selected from the
University of Bamenda. These numbers were the

actual sample size that was used to complete the
questionnaire.

It is also worthy of note that, 25% of university
administrators, lecturers and Graduates were selected
from Faculties of Education, Arts and College of
Technology while, 12.5% of administrators, 16.67% of
lecturers and 16.43% of graduates were selected from
Advanced School of Translation and Interpretation.
12.5% of university administrators, 8.33% of lecturers
and 8.57% of graduates were also selected from the
Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences.

In this same vein, 12.5% of university administrators and
graduates and 13.33% of lecturers were selected from
the departments of; History and Electrical and
electronic

technology.

12.5%

of

university

administrators and graduates and 11.67% of lecturers
were selected from the departments of; English
language and Civil engineering technology. 12.5% of
university administrators and graduates were selected
from the departments of; Educational leadership and
Special education while 8.33% of lecturers were
selected from the departments of Educational
leadership and Special education departments. 6.25% of
university administrators were also selected from the
departments of Translation and Interpretation,
Accounting and Banking and Finance. 8.33% of lecturers
were selected from the department of Translation and
Interpretation, 4.33% and 4.00% of lecturers were
selected from the department of Accounting and
Banking and Finance respectively. 8.21% each of
graduates were selected from the departments of
Translation and Interpretation, and 4.21% each of
graduates were selected from the departments of
Accounting and banking and Finance. This implies a
blend of knowledge and experience from these
respondents

with

different

qualification

and

background was necessary to provide the needed
information for this study.

Table 3: -

Graduates’ Opinions on Teaching Methods in Anglo

-Saxon Universities in Cameroon

S
N

SECTION B

𝑿

̅

S

Decisio
n

1

The teaching methods used in my courses foster active
student participation.

3.13 0.3

2

A

2

Teaching methods used in my courses promote
collaboration and teamwork.

2.88 0.3

4

A

3

Teaching methods encourage active engagement.

2.98 0.3

3

A

4

Teaching methods provided opportunities for practical
application of knowledge.

2.90 0.3

4

A


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

18

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

5

All the teaching methods used enhanced your learning
experience.

2.87 0.3

4

A

6

The teaching methods employed in my courses have
contributed significantly to my academic growth.

2.79 0.3

6

A

7

Teaching methods have helped me develop problem-
solving skills.

2.88 0.3

4

A

8

9

10

Teaching methods have prepared me well for my future
career through fostering self-reliance.
My level of self-reliance has increased throughout my
final year studies.
The lecturers use a variety of instructional resources and
materials to enhance learning.

MRS

2.80

2.91

2.79

2.89

0.3
5

0.3
4

0.3
4

0.3
4

A

A

A

A

MRS = Mean response score = Mean score S = Standard deviation

From table 3 above, 10 test items were constructed for
respondents to provide responses to the research
questions. The mean response score of (=2.89±0.34)

shows that teaching methods can determine self-
reliance of graduates from Anglo-Saxon Universities in
Cameroon.

Table 4: - Lecturers Opinions on Teaching Methods in Anglo-Saxon Universities in Cameroon

SN SECTION B

𝑿

̅

S

Decision

1

The teaching methods I employ in the classroom engage
students actively in the learning process.

3.33 0.30

A

2

I incorporate a variety of teaching strategies and
techniques to cater to different learning styles and needs
of students.

3.27 0.31

A

3

I encourage critical thinking through my teaching
methods.

3.46 0.29

A

4

I provide opportunities for students to collaborate in
groups during classroom activities.

3.48 0.28

A

5

I encourage students to take ownership of their learning
to seek clarification or help when needed.

3.48 0.28

A

6

I provide opportunities for students to work
independently to develop self-directed learning skills.

3.42 0.29

A

7

I facilitate opportunities for students to set goals to track
their progress towards achieving them.

3.43 0.29

A

8


9



10

My students demonstrate a high level of self-reliance in
their learning process
The educational resources effectively prepare students
for future academic pursuits or professional careers
through fostering self-reliance.
The availability of educational resources significantly
contributes to the development of self-reliance in
students.

MRS

3.28

3.31


3.36

3.38

0.30

0.30


0.29

0.29

A

A


A

A

MRS = Mean response score = Mean score S = Standard deviation


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

19

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

From table 4 above, it is seen that 10 test items were
constructed for lecturers to provide responses to
research question three. The test statistics obtained
from the responses showed that the mean response

score of (=3.38±0.29) revealed that, teaching methods
can determine self-reliance of graduates from Anglo-
Saxon Universities in Cameroon.

Table 5: - Enhancement of Teaching Methods on Self-Reliance of Graduates from Anglo-Saxon Universities in

Cameroon (N=580)

Variable

∑X

∑X

2

∑Y

∑Y

2

∑XY

Г

xy

p-value

Teaching Methods (X)

18240

332697

15108192

0.310

0.001

Self-Reliance of graduates (Y)

8283

68608

p* < 0.05; df = 99; critical Г

xy

= 0.1956; (N= 580)

Data analyses on table 5 above revealed that, at alpha
level of significance 0.05 with degree of freedom 99,
the calculated correlation coefficient value rxy-
computed is 0.310 which is higher compared to the

critical value of 0.1956 (Гxy

-critical). Also, given that

the calculated p-value is 0.001 which is far lower than
0.05, the interpretation here is that, there is a
significant positive relationship between the two
variables. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected
and it was concluded that teaching methods

significantly enhance self-reliance of graduates from
Anglo-Saxon Universities in Cameroon. The positive sign
of the rxy-computed value implies that, self-reliance of
graduates may likely improve when teaching methods
provide opportunities for students to collaborate and
work in groups during classroom activities. There by,
making students to be engaged to critical thinking and
practical application of knowledge in real world
situations.

Table 6: - Open questions Responses of Graduates on Teaching Methods

Theme

Groundi
ng

Coded responses

S

u

p

p

or

t of

c

ou

rse

wo

rk

an

d

M

ate

rial

s


Decision making
and projects

Internships and
better
understanding




Limited
Importance


72


79





29

“It has helped me to make decision on my
own.”
“It has helped me moderately.”
“It helped me to carry out projects.”

“It provides more guidelines for better
understanding.”
“Very efficient.”
“More group work.”
“More internships.”
“Encourage me to research.”

“It did not help me in any way.”
“It has not prepared me to be self-
reliant.”
“Students should learn to help
themselves.”


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

20

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

Re

com

m

en

d

ation

s

for

q

u

ali

ty

re

sou

rc

es

More

Practical

and up to date
resources






Updated
curriculum


68






33

“Provision of laptops to student should
be put in place.”
“It should be up to date.”
“More practical work.”
“Provision of more practical materials.”
“Practical works should be included in
our curriculum.”

“More assignments should be given to
students.”
“Lecturers should provide material for
student ahead of time.”
“Curriculum should be updated yearly.”

From table 6 above, five themes emanated from the
respondents responses on teaching methods namely;
Decision making and projects, internships and better
understanding, graduates autonomy, more practical
and up to date resources and updated curriculum. On
support of course work and materials, the first theme
is decision making and projects. Owing to this theme,
respondents said in their own words that teaching

methods; “has helped me to make decision on my
own.” “It has helped me moderately.” “It helped me to
carry out projects.” The second theme is internships

and better understanding. In this light, most of the
respondents attested that teaching methods used

“provide more guidelines for better understanding.”
“Very efficient.” “More group work.” “More
internships.” “Encourage me to research.”

The third theme is limited importance, in this regard,

respondents said in their own words that teaching

methods; “did not help me in any way.” “It has not

prepared me to be self-

reliant.” “Students should learn

to help themselves.” On recommendations for

quality

resources, there were two themes. This first theme is
more practical and up to date resources. Owing to this

theme, respondents stated that; “Provision of laptops to
student should be put in place.” “It should be up to
date.” “More practical work.” “Provision of more
practical materials.” “Practical works should be included
in our curriculum.” The last theme is updated

curriculum. This is evident in respondents responses as

they stated that; “More assignments should be given to
students.” “Lecturer

s should provide material for

student ahead of time.” “Curriculum should be updated
yearly.”


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

21

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

Table 7: -Lecturers Open Responses on Teaching Methods

Data

from table 7 above led us to derive four themes from

Theme

Groundi
ng

Coded Responses

Su

pp

o

rt

o

f E

du

ca

ti

onal R

es

our

ce

s

I

m

pac

t o

f E

du

cat

ional R

es

our

ce

s

Skills
acquisition and
critical
thinking.












Collaboration
and life- long
learning








Assessment
and
instructional
methods






Community
Resources




99












87










61








63

“By fostering self-awareness, metacognitive skills
and growth in mind set.”
“It encourages a culture of continuous improvement,
helping students understand the efforts leads to
growth.”
“Reflective practices incorporate students to think
critically about their learning, analyse their strengths
and

weaknesses

and

devise

strategies

for

improvement.”
“Using open-ended questioning encourages critical
thinking and self-direction.”
“This prompts students to articulate their thought and
develop independent reasoning skills.”
“Development

of

critical

thinking

and

resourcefulness.”

“The feedback and reflection driven approach employ
prepares students to be life-long learners.”
“Teachers’ reflection on students’ feedback can lead
to the refinement of teaching methods and strategies.”
“Incorporating students’ feedback and reflection
cultivates a collaborative learning environment where
students and teachers work together as partners in the
educational process.”
“Creating spaces that allows for various learning
styles such as quiet areas for focused work and
collaborative spaces for group projects encourages
self-directed learning.”

“It equips them to adapt to changing circumstances.”
“Thus, allow me to continuously improve my
instructional methods.”
“Feedback informs formative assessments and helps
in designing effective summative assessments.”
“Incorporate student feedback and reflection into my
teaching practice creates an iterate cycle of evaluation
and refinement.”
“Inviting guest speakers or industry professional to
share their experiences.”
“Designing interdisciplinary projects-based learning
activities that mirror-real world problem solving.”
“Organising internship, job shadowing or community
services projects.”
“Offer students choices in term of topics, projects of
demonstrating their learning. This allows them to
align their work with their personal interest and
strengths.”
“Present real-world problems for students to solve
collaboratively.”


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

22

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

the respondents’ responses. These themes are: Skills

acquisition and critical thinking, Collaboration and life-
long learning, Assessment and instructional methods
and Community Resources. Precisely, on the impact of
educational resources, the first theme is skills
acquisition and critical thinking. In this regard,
respondents stated that feedback and reflection in

teaching methods help “By fostering self

-awareness,

metacognitive skills and growth in mindset.” “It

encourages a culture of continuous improvement,
helping students understand the efforts leads to

growth.” “Reflective practices incorporate students to

think critically about their learning, analyse their
strengths and weaknesses and devise strategies for

improvement.” “Using open

-ended questioning

encourages critical thinking and self-

direction.” “This

prompts student to articulate their thought and

develop independent reasoning skills.” “Development
of critical thinking and resourcefulness.” The second

theme is collaboration and life-long learning, as

respondents also stated that; “The feedback and

reflection driven approach employ prepares students
to be life-

long learners.” “Teachers’ reflection on

students’ feedback can lead to the refinement of
teaching methods and strategies.” “Incorporating

s

tudents’ feedback and reflection cultivates a

collaborative learning environment where students
and teachers work together as partners in the

educational process.” “Creating spaces that allows for

various learning styles such as quiet areas for focused
work and collaborative spaces for group projects
encourages self-

directed learning.”

On support of educational resources, the first theme is
assessment and instructional methods; owing to this,
respondents attested that some of the adjustment
made in their t

eaching methods “equip them to adapt

to changing circumstances.” “Thus, allow me to
continuously improve my instructional methods.”
“Feedback informs formative assessments and helps in
designing

effective

summative

assessments.”

“Incorporate student feedba

ck and reflection into my

teaching practice creates an iterate cycle of evaluation

and refinement.” In the same vein the last theme is

community resources. Precisely, respondents stated

that adjustment in teaching methods made is “Inviting

guest speakers or industry professional to share their

experiences.” “Designing interdisciplinary projects

-

based learning activities that mirror-real world

problem solving.” “Organising internship, job
shadowing or community services projects.” “Offer

students choices in term of topics, projects of
demonstrating their learning. This allows them to align

their work with their personal interest and strengths.”
“Present real

-world problems for students to solve

collaboratively.”

Interview

Guides

Responses

of

Universities

Administrators on Teaching Methods

The responses from universities administrators on
teaching methods and self-reliance of graduates had
sixteen participants. These responses were grouped
into two main Categories namely: Strategies to assess
impact of teaching methods and Examples of innovative
teaching methods use. On the first category which is
strategies to assess impact of teaching methods,
respondents said that, they used pedagogic feedback to
assess the impact of teaching methods. This was
substantiated as they stated in their own words that;

“Students are made to have feedback of the learning
through the course delegates.” “Test and examinations
scores are used.” “By observation of learners.”
“Evaluation and term papers are used.” “Students’

feedback in

class.” On the second category which is

examples of innovative teaching methods used in
universities, respondents said, varieties of teaching
methods are used. They enumerated some of these

innovative teaching methods used as follows; “Project

based learni

ng.” “Inquiry base learning.” “Collaborative

learning.” “A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) learning.”
“Competence base approach.” “Experiential learning.”
“Blended learning.” “Personalized learning.” “Peer

-to-

peer learning.” Conclusively, when a variety of

innovative teaching methods are used with regular
assessment of the impact of these teaching methods, it
will go a long way to increase self-reliance of graduates
from Anglo-Saxon Universities in Cameroon

DISCUSSION

The findings revealed that, teaching methods
significantly enhance self-reliance of graduates from
Anglo-Saxon Universities in Cameroon. This implies that,
self-reliance of graduates will likely improve when
teaching methods provide opportunities for students to
collaborate and work in groups during classroom
activities. However, students accepted that teaching
methods have helped them develop critical thinking and
problem-solving skills. Students stated that, lecturers
used a variety of instructional resources and materials
to enhance learning. Students admitted that, teaching
methods used in their courses promote collaboration
and teamwork. This was supported by the views of
lecturers as they admitted that they provide
opportunities for students to collaborate and work in
groups during classroom activities. Lecturers attested
that, they encouraged critical thinking and problem-
solving skills through their teaching methods. Lecturers
attested that, they provide opportunities for students to


background image

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

23

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

work independently and to develop self-directed
learning skills. However, students admitted that,
teaching methods have prepared them well for their
future career through fostering self-reliance.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that teaching methods positively and
significantly enhance self-reliance of graduates from
Anglo-Saxon universities in Cameroon. It was
suggested that, adequate and up to date materials and
educational resources should be regularly provided to
universities and that different teaching methods
should be used by lecturers to help students and
graduates to be self-reliant.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It was recommended that innovative teaching
methods with opportunities for practical work should
be adopted by lecturers in order to contribute
significantly to the academic growth and development
of graduates. Also, regard to self-reliance of graduates,
graduates should be open to learning from failures and
setbacks in their career journey and to have a clear
vision of their career goals in order to take appropriate
decision on how to achieve them.

REFERENCES

Alesandrini, K., & Larson, L. (2002). Teaching bridge to
constructivism.

Balan, P; & Metcalfe, M. (2012). Identifying teaching
methods that engage entrepreneurship students.
Education Training.

Barro, M. & Lee, V. (2010). A New Data Set for
Educational Attainment in the World, 1950- 2010.
Retrieved

from

Http://www.educational.attainment.Cfm

Butcher, V. S., Judith, K. J., & Burton, Laila (2011).
Review of Good Practice in Employability and
Enterprise Development by Centres for Excellence in
Teaching and Learning. New York: Higher Education
Academy.

Cruickshank, D. R., Jenkins, D. B, & Metcalf, K. K. (2006).
The Act of Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill
companies

Dorgu, T. E. (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A
Panacea for effective curriculum implementation in
the classroom. Internal journal of secondary
education.

Endeley, M. N. (2014). Professionalisation of Higher
Education: Assessing Teaching and Learning within the

BMP in the university of Buea. African journal of
Education and Technology. ISSN-2046-6927. Vol. 4,
number 1 (2014) 97-111.

Fonkeng, G. E. (2007). The History of Education in
Cameroon: 1884-2004 Edwin. Mellen press.

Moore, K.D. (2001). Classroom Teaching Skills (5th
edition). The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Nilson, L. B (2010). Teaching at its Best. A research-
based resource for college instructors (3rd edition). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Omari, I. M. (2015). Introduction to university teaching
and assessment of learning processes and outcomes.
Dar es Salaam: The Open university of Tanzania.

Sajjad, S. (2011). Effective Teaching Methods at Higher
Education Level.

Tambo, L. I. (2003). Cameroon National Education Policy
since 1995 Forum. Design House.

Tanyi,

M.

E.

(2006).

Professionalization

and

Collaboration of Teachers, the Missing Link in Teache

rs’

Education in Cameroon: A Psychological View. In T. M.
Tchombe and P. Fonkoua (Eds.) Professionalization et
formation desenseignants au Cameroun. Terroirs.

Westwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know
about teaching methods? Camberwell, vic: ACER Press.

References

Alesandrini, K., & Larson, L. (2002). Teaching bridge to constructivism.

Balan, P; & Metcalfe, M. (2012). Identifying teaching methods that engage entrepreneurship students. Education Training.

Barro, M. & Lee, V. (2010). A New Data Set for Educational Attainment in the World, 1950- 2010. Retrieved from Http://www.educational.attainment.Cfm

Butcher, V. S., Judith, K. J., & Burton, Laila (2011). Review of Good Practice in Employability and Enterprise Development by Centres for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. New York: Higher Education Academy.

Cruickshank, D. R., Jenkins, D. B, & Metcalf, K. K. (2006). The Act of Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill companies

Dorgu, T. E. (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A Panacea for effective curriculum implementation in the classroom. Internal journal of secondary education.

Endeley, M. N. (2014). Professionalisation of Higher Education: Assessing Teaching and Learning within the BMP in the university of Buea. African journal of Education and Technology. ISSN-2046-6927. Vol. 4, number 1 (2014) 97-111.

Fonkeng, G. E. (2007). The History of Education in Cameroon: 1884-2004 Edwin. Mellen press.

Moore, K.D. (2001). Classroom Teaching Skills (5th edition). The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Nilson, L. B (2010). Teaching at its Best. A research-based resource for college instructors (3rd edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Omari, I. M. (2015). Introduction to university teaching and assessment of learning processes and outcomes. Dar es Salaam: The Open university of Tanzania.

Sajjad, S. (2011). Effective Teaching Methods at Higher Education Level.

Tambo, L. I. (2003). Cameroon National Education Policy since 1995 Forum. Design House.

Tanyi, M. E. (2006). Professionalization and Collaboration of Teachers, the Missing Link in Teachers’ Education in Cameroon: A Psychological View. In T. M. Tchombe and P. Fonkoua (Eds.) Professionalization et formation desenseignants au Cameroun. Terroirs.

Westwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know about teaching methods? Camberwell, vic: ACER Press.