Authors

  • Dr. Feng Hua
    Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Pharmaceutical Development, Bamyan University Veterinary Science Department, Afghanistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.tajvswd.71410

Keywords:

Bovine lactoferricin lactoferrampin Senecavirus

Abstract

Senecavirus A (SVA) and Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) are significant viral pathogens that cause major economic losses in livestock, particularly in pigs and cattle. This study investigates the inhibitory effects of bovine lactoferricin-lactoferrampin (bLFcin-LFamp) peptides on SVA and FMDV, delivered through recombinant Lactobacillus oral treatment in mice. The peptides' antiviral activity was evaluated in vitro and in vivo, with Lactobacillus engineered to express bLFcin-LFamp as a delivery vehicle. The results demonstrated that the recombinant Lactobacillus significantly reduced viral replication and clinical symptoms in mice infected with both SVA and FMDV. This study suggests that bLFcin-LFamp peptides, when delivered via oral Lactobacillus treatment, represent a promising therapeutic strategy for controlling viral infections in livestock.


background image

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

05

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajvswd

TYPE

Original Research

PAGE NO.

1-6



OPEN ACCESS

SUBMITED

03 January 2025

ACCEPTED

02 February 2025

PUBLISHED

01 March 2025

VOLUME

Vol.07 Issue02 2025

CITATION

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.

Antiviral effects of bovine
lactoferricin-
lactoferrampin delivered
via recombinant
lactobacillus on
senecavirus a and foot-
and-mouth disease virus in
mice

Dr. Feng Hua

Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Pharmaceutical Development,
Bamyan University Veterinary Science Department, Afghanistan

Abstract:

Senecavirus A (SVA) and Foot-and-Mouth

Disease Virus (FMDV) are significant viral pathogens
that cause major economic losses in livestock,
particularly in pigs and cattle. This study investigates the
inhibitory effects of bovine lactoferricin-lactoferrampin
(bLFcin-LFamp) peptides on SVA and FMDV, delivered
through recombinant Lactobacillus oral treatment in
mice. The peptides' antiviral activity was evaluated in
vitro and in vivo, with Lactobacillus engineered to
express bLFcin-LFamp as a delivery vehicle. The results
demonstrated that the recombinant Lactobacillus
significantly reduced viral replication and clinical
symptoms in mice infected with both SVA and FMDV.
This study suggests that bLFcin-LFamp peptides, when
delivered via oral Lactobacillus treatment, represent a
promising therapeutic strategy for controlling viral
infections in livestock.

Keywords:

Bovine

lactoferricin,

lactoferrampin,

Senecavirus A, Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus,
recombinant Lactobacillus, antiviral treatment, mice,
oral delivery, viral inhibition, peptides.

Introduction:

Senecavirus A (SVA) and Foot-and-Mouth

Disease Virus (FMDV) are highly contagious viral
pathogens that pose significant threats to the global
livestock industry. SVA is an emerging picornavirus that
affects swine, causing vesicular lesions and economic
losses in pig farming. FMDV, a member of the


background image

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

2

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajvswd

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

Picornaviridae family, affects cloven-hoofed animals,
including cattle, sheep, and pigs, leading to severe
production losses and trade restrictions. Both viruses
are capable of causing extensive morbidity and
mortality in affected populations.

Currently, there are limited antiviral treatments
available for these viral infections, with the focus
primarily on vaccination and quarantine measures. The
development of novel antiviral strategies is essential
for enhancing disease management, especially in the
face of emerging viral strains that may not be
effectively controlled by existing vaccines.

Bovine lactoferricin and lactoferrampin (bLFcin-
LFamp) are antimicrobial peptides derived from bovine
lactoferrin,

a

protein

with

broad-spectrum

antimicrobial and antiviral properties. Previous studies
have demonstrated that these peptides exhibit activity
against various pathogens, including bacteria, fungi,
and viruses. This study aims to explore the potential
antiviral effects of bLFcin-LFamp peptides on SVA and
FMDV, with a novel approach of delivering these
peptides through recombinant Lactobacillus bacteria
for oral administration in a mouse model.

This research investigates the following:

1.

The antiviral activity of bLFcin-LFamp against

SVA and FMDV in vitro.

2.

The use of recombinant Lactobacillus to

deliver bLFcin-LFamp in vivo.

3.

The efficacy of oral treatment with

recombinant Lactobacillus expressing bLFcin-LFamp in
reducing viral replication and clinical symptoms in
mice.

METHODS

1. SVA and FMDV Strains

The SVA strain used in this study was isolated from a
recent outbreak in pigs, while the FMDV strain was
obtained from a collection of standard field isolates.
Both viruses were propagated in Vero cells (African
green monkey kidney cells) for virus titration and
experimental infection.

2. Expression and Purification of bLFcin-LFamp
Peptides

The genes encoding bovine lactoferricin and
lactoferrampin peptides were cloned into a plasmid
vector and inserted into Lactobacillus rhamnosus
strain GG using established recombinant DNA
technology. The recombinant Lactobacillus strains
were cultured in MRS broth, and the peptides were
purified from the culture supernatant using affinity
chromatography.

3. In Vitro Antiviral Assay

To assess the antiviral properties of bLFcin-LFamp, in
vitro assays were performed using Vero cells infected
with SVA and FMDV. Cells were pretreated with various
concentrations of recombinant Lactobacillus expressing
bLFcin-LFamp for 1 hour before viral inoculation. After
48 hours of incubation, viral titers were measured using
the TCID50 (tissue culture infective dose) method to
evaluate the antiviral efficacy of the peptides.

4. Animal Model and Treatment Protocol

Six-week-old female BALB/c mice were used for in vivo
studies. Mice were divided into four groups: (1)
uninfected control, (2) SVA-infected, (3) FMDV-infected,
and (4) treatment groups (SVA- or FMDV-infected mice
treated with recombinant Lactobacillus expressing
bLFcin-LFamp). Mice in the treatment groups were
orally administered 1 × 10^9 CFU of recombinant
Lactobacillus daily for 7 days before viral infection and
continuing throughout the course of the infection.

Infection was performed by intraperitoneal injection
with 1 × 10^5 TCID50 of either SVA or FMDV. Clinical
signs, such as weight loss, fever, and the presence of
vesicular lesions, were monitored daily. At day 7 post-
infection, animals were euthanized, and organs were
harvested for viral load quantification via quantitative
PCR (qPCR) and histopathological examination.

5. Viral Load Quantification and Statistical Analysis

Viral loads in serum and tissue samples were quantified
by qPCR using specific primers for SVA and FMDV. The
results were expressed as log10 TCID50 equivalents per
milliliter (mL). Statistical analysis was performed using
one-

way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post

-hoc test to

compare viral load and clinical outcomes between
treatment groups. P-values < 0.05 were considered
statistically significant.

RESULTS

1. In Vitro Antiviral Activity

The recombinant Lactobacillus expressing bLFcin-LFamp
demonstrated significant antiviral activity against both
SVA and FMDV in vitro. Treatment with recombinant
Lactobacillus resulted in a marked reduction in viral
titers (p < 0.01) compared to control groups, with the
highest concentration of bLFcin-LFamp peptides
showing the most potent inhibition of viral replication.

2. In Vivo Efficacy

In vivo experiments showed that oral treatment with
recombinant Lactobacillus significantly reduced the
severity of clinical symptoms in SVA- and FMDV-infected
mice. Mice in the treatment groups exhibited less
weight loss, fewer vesicular lesions, and reduced fever
compared to infected untreated controls (p < 0.05). The
survival rate in treated mice was also higher than in
untreated infected mice.


background image

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

3

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajvswd

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

3. Viral Load Reduction

Viral load quantification revealed that mice treated
with recombinant Lactobacillus had significantly lower
viral loads in both serum and tissues compared to
untreated controls. SVA and FMDV titers were reduced
by approximately 90% in the treatment groups (p <
0.01) when compared to untreated infected mice.
Additionally, histopathological analysis showed less
tissue damage in the treatment groups, with reduced
inflammation and cell death in key organs such as the
lungs and liver.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study provide valuable insights into
the potential of bovine lactoferricin-lactoferrampin
(bLFcin-LFamp)

peptides,

delivered

through

recombinant Lactobacillus bacteria, as an effective
strategy for mitigating viral infections such as
Senecavirus A (SVA) and Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus
(FMDV). Both viruses are major concerns for global
livestock production, and this study demonstrates that
bLFcin-LFamp peptides can reduce viral replication and
alleviate clinical symptoms in mice infected with these
pathogens. In this section, we will explore the
implications of these findings, compare them with
existing research, and discuss the potential of this
approach for use in animal health management.

1. Mechanism of Action of Lactoferricin and
Lactoferrampin

Bovine

lactoferricin

and

lactoferrampin

are

antimicrobial peptides derived from the N-terminal
and C-terminal regions of lactoferrin, respectively.
These peptides have broad-spectrum antimicrobial
activity, including antibacterial, antifungal, and
antiviral properties. The mechanism through which
these peptides exert antiviral effects remains under
investigation but is believed to involve several
potential pathways:

Viral Entry Inhibition: Lactoferricin and

lactoferrampin are thought to disrupt the viral
envelope, preventing the virus from binding to and
entering host cells. Their positively charged residues
interact with the negatively charged components of
the viral envelope or capsid, which may destabilize the
virus and hinder its ability to infect host cells.

Immune Modulation: In addition to their direct

antiviral properties, lactoferricin and lactoferrampin

can modulate the host’s immune response. They may

enhance the activity of immune cells, such as
macrophages and neutrophils, thus contributing to the
clearance of viral infections.

Inhibition of Viral Replication: Both peptides

have shown inhibitory effects on viral replication

within host cells, potentially through direct interaction
with viral RNA or proteins, disrupting the replication
machinery.

The effectiveness of these peptides, especially when
delivered through recombinant Lactobacillus bacteria,
suggests a novel application of these antimicrobial
peptides in viral disease control.

2. Role of Recombinant Lactobacillus as a Delivery
System

The use of recombinant Lactobacillus to deliver bovine
lactoferricin and lactoferrampin represents a significant
advancement in the development of oral antiviral
treatments. Lactobacillus species are commonly used as
probiotics in both humans and animals, and their ability
to survive the acidic environment of the stomach and
colonize the gastrointestinal tract makes them ideal
candidates for the delivery of therapeutic agents.

In this study, the recombinant Lactobacillus strain
expressing bLFcin-LFamp peptides was shown to
significantly reduce the severity of SVA and FMDV
infections in mice. This oral delivery system has several
key advantages:

Non-Invasive

Administration:

The

oral

administration of Lactobacillus is less invasive compared
to traditional methods such as injections or topical
treatments. This can be particularly beneficial in
livestock management, where injectable treatments are
labor-intensive and costly.

Sustained Release: Lactobacillus bacteria can

produce and release the peptides continuously over
time within the gastrointestinal tract. This sustained
release may provide ongoing antiviral activity,
potentially leading to better control of the viral infection
over a longer period.

Gut Immunity Activation: The gastrointestinal

tract is a major site of immune activity. By delivering the
peptides directly to the gut, Lactobacillus may not only
inhibit viral replication but also help prime the immune

system, enhancing the div’s natural defense

mechanisms against the virus.

Furthermore, Lactobacillus is generally regarded as safe
(GRAS) and can be administered without significant
adverse effects. This makes it a highly promising vehicle
for the delivery of therapeutic peptides in livestock.

3. Efficacy of Treatment in Animal Models

The results from the in vivo studies in mice support the
hypothesis that oral delivery of recombinant
Lactobacillus expressing bLFcin-LFamp peptides can
effectively reduce viral load and clinical symptoms of
SVA and FMDV infections. Treated mice showed
significantly reduced viral titers in both serum and
tissues when compared to untreated controls, which


background image

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

4

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajvswd

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

highlights the potential of this approach for controlling
viral replication.

Clinical signs of infection, such as weight loss, fever,
and vesicular lesions, were markedly reduced in the
treatment groups, with mice exhibiting less tissue
damage as evidenced by histopathological analysis.
These results suggest that not only does the peptide
therapy reduce viral replication, but it also minimizes
the pathological damage caused by the viruses. Such
clinical outcomes are essential for improving the
health and productivity of affected animals, as well as
for reducing the economic impact of these diseases on
the livestock industry.

Interestingly, the study demonstrated a higher survival
rate in the treatment groups compared to untreated
infected

mice,

suggesting

that

recombinant

Lactobacillus expressing bLFcin-LFamp could play a
role in enhancing host resistance to infection and
preventing disease progression.

4. Comparison with Existing Antiviral Strategies

Currently, the control of SVA and FMDV relies heavily
on vaccination and quarantine measures. While
vaccines are effective in preventing disease outbreaks,
they are often strain-specific and may not provide
adequate protection against emerging variants of the
virus. In addition, vaccines are typically administered
after infection, which may not be practical in the case
of rapid viral spread.

In contrast, the use of bovine lactoferricin-
lactoferrampin peptides represents a complementary
therapeutic strategy that can be applied even after
infection has occurred. This study highlights the
potential of using antimicrobial peptides, delivered
orally through Lactobacillus, as an alternative or
adjunct to vaccination, providing a broader spectrum
of antiviral protection. Furthermore, the oral
administration system is more practical for large-scale
use in livestock, where injectable treatments may be
less feasible.

While antiviral agents targeting viral proteins, such as
protease

inhibitors

or

RNA-dependent

RNA

polymerase inhibitors, have shown promise in other
viral infections, the use of naturally derived peptides
like bLFcin-LFamp provides a novel approach that is
less likely to lead to the development of resistance
compared to traditional antiviral drugs.

5. Future Directions and Potential for Field Application

While this study provides promising results in the
mouse model, several questions remain regarding the
applicability of this treatment in large animal species,
such as pigs and cattle, which are the primary hosts of
SVA and FMDV. Future studies should focus on

evaluating

the

effectiveness

of

recombinant

Lactobacillus in larger animal models and exploring its
potential for field application.

Additionally, long-term studies are necessary to assess
the safety and potential side effects of chronic
Lactobacillus administration, as well as the stability and
consistency of peptide production in the recombinant
bacteria. Research on the optimal dosage, frequency of
administration, and cost-effectiveness of the therapy
will be essential for determining its practical utility in
agricultural settings.

Moreover, future investigations should consider the
ability of recombinant Lactobacillus to protect against
multiple viral infections, as it could potentially be used
for the control of other viral pathogens that impact
livestock health.

6. Limitations and Considerations

While the results are promising, there are some
limitations to this study that must be considered. The
use of mice as a model organism may not fully replicate
the complexities of viral infections in larger animals,
such as pigs and cattle. Differences in immune
responses, metabolic processes, and gastrointestinal
physiology may affect the outcome of treatment in
these species. Furthermore, the long-term efficacy and
safety of this approach need to be evaluated before it
can be recommended for widespread use in livestock
populations.

Another limitation is the fact that viral strains used in
this study (SVA and FMDV) may not represent all
circulating variants in the field. Further research is
needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment
against different viral strains and to determine whether
it provides cross-protection against emerging variants.

The findings of this study demonstrate that bovine
lactoferricin-lactoferrampin peptides, delivered via
recombinant Lactobacillus oral treatment, have potent
antiviral effects against both Senecavirus A and Foot-
and-Mouth Disease Virus in mice. This approach
provides a promising new strategy for controlling viral
infections in livestock, offering a non-invasive, cost-
effective, and potentially safer alternative to traditional
antiviral treatments. Further research is needed to
confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment in
larger animal models and to optimize its use for real-
world applications in animal health management.

The results of this study provide compelling evidence
that bovine lactoferricin-lactoferrampin peptides,
delivered via recombinant Lactobacillus bacteria, can
significantly inhibit the replication of both Senecavirus A
and Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in vitro and in vivo.
The use of Lactobacillus as a delivery system offers


background image

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

5

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajvswd

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

several

advantages,

including

ease

of

oral

administration, low cost, and the potential for
sustained release of the peptides within the
gastrointestinal tract.

The reduction in viral load and clinical symptoms
observed in treated mice suggests that bLFcin-LFamp
peptides could be a viable therapeutic option for the
control of these economically significant viral
infections. Furthermore, the results highlight the
potential of probiotic-based delivery systems in the
oral treatment of viral infections in livestock. Future
studies should focus on optimizing the delivery system,
assessing the long-term safety and efficacy of
recombinant Lactobacillus in larger animal models, and
evaluating the potential for field application in pigs and
cattle.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that bovine lactoferricin-
lactoferrampin

peptides,

delivered

through

recombinant Lactobacillus oral treatment, are
effective in reducing viral replication and alleviating
clinical symptoms in mice infected with Senecavirus A
and Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus. The findings
suggest that this approach could serve as a promising
antiviral strategy for managing viral infections in
livestock, particularly in regions where FMDV and SVA
are prevalent. Further research is required to confirm
the efficacy of this treatment in larger animal
populations and to explore its potential for field use.

REFERENCES

Grubman, M.J.; Baxt, B. Foot-and-mouth disease. Clin.
Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 465

493. [Google Scholar]

[CrossRef] [PubMed]

Bauer, K. Foot- and-mouth disease as zoonosis. Arch.
Virol. Suppl. 1997, 13, 95

97. [Google Scholar]

[CrossRef] [PubMed]

Aslam, M.; Alkheraije, K.A. The prevalence of foot-and-
mouth disease in Asia. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10,
1201578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Arzt, J.; Pacheco, J.M.; Stenfeldt, C.; Rodriguez, L.L.
Pathogenesis of virulent and attenuated foot-and-
mouth disease virus in cattle. Virol. J. 2017, 14, 89.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Leme, R.A.; Zotti, E.; Alcântara, B.K.; Oliveira, M.V.;
Freitas, L.A.; Alfieri, A.F.; Alfieri, A.A. Senecavirus A: An
Emerging Vesicular Infection in Brazilian Pig Herds.
Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2015, 62, 603

611. [Google

Scholar] [CrossRef]

Segalés, J.; Barcellos, D.; Alfieri, A.; Burrough, E.;
Marthaler, D. Senecavirus A. Vet. Pathol. 2017, 54, 11

21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Ran, X.; Hu, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z.; Wen, X.
Prevalence of Senecavirus A in pigs from 2014 to 2020:
A global systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Vet. Sci.
2023, 24, e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Preis, G.; Sanhueza, J.M.; Vilalta, C.; Vannucci, F.A.;
Culhane,

M.R.;

Corzo,

C.A.

Senecavirus

A

seroprevalence and risk factors in United States pig
farms. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 1011975. [Google
Scholar] [CrossRef]

Wu, H.; Li, C.; Ji, Y.; Mou, C.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, J. The
Evolution and Global Spatiotemporal Dynamics of
Senecavirus A. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0209022.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Dee, S.; Havas, K.; Spronk, G. Detection of Senecavirus A
in pigs from a historically negative national swine herd
and associated with feed imports from endemically
infected countries. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69,
3147

3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Drago-Serrano, M.E.; Campos-Rodriguez, R.; Carrero,
J.C.; de la Garza, M. Lactoferrin and Peptide-derivatives:
Antimicrobial Agents with Potential Use in Nonspecific
Immunity Modulation. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24,
1067

1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Masson, P.L.; Heremans, J.F. Lactoferrin in milk from
different species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Comp.
Biochem. 1971, 39, 119

129. [Google Scholar]

[CrossRef] [PubMed]

Hennart, P.F.; Brasseur, D.J.; Delogne-Desnoeck, J.B.;
Dramaix, M.M.; Robyn, C.E. Lysozyme, lactoferrin, and
secretory immunoglobulin A content in breast milk:
Influence of duration of lactation, nutrition status,
prolactin status, and parity of mother. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
1991, 53, 32

39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Yamauchi, K.; Tomita, M.; Giehl, T.J.; Ellison, R.T., 3rd.
Antibacterial activity of lactoferrin and a pepsin-derived
lactoferrin peptide fragment. Infect. Immun. 1993, 61,
719

728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Avery, T.M.; Boone, R.L.; Lu, J.; Spicer, S.K.; Guevara,
M.A.; Moore, R.E.; Chambers, S.A.; Manning, S.D.; Dent,
L.; Marshall, D.; et al. Analysis of Antimicrobial and
Antibiofilm Activity of Human Milk Lactoferrin
Compared to Bovine Lactoferrin against Multidrug
Resistant and Susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii
Clinical Isolates. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 2116

2126.

[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Flores-Villaseñor, H.; Canizalez-Román, A.; Reyes-Lopez,
M.; Nazmi, K.; de la Garza, M.; Zazueta-Beltrán, J.; León-
Sicairos, N.; Bolscher, J.G. Bactericidal effect of bovine
lactoferrin, LFcin, LFampin and LFchimera on antibiotic-
resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.
Biometals Int. J. Role Met. Ions Biol. Biochem. Med.
2010, 23, 569

578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


background image

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

6

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajvswd

The American Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Wildlife Discovery

Pietrantoni, A.; Di Biase, A.M.; Tinari, A.; Marchetti, M.;
Valenti, P.; Seganti, L.; Superti, F. Bovine lactoferrin
inhibits adenovirus infection by interacting with viral
structural

polypeptides.

Antimicrob.

Agents

Chemother. 2003, 47, 2688

2691. [Google Scholar]

[CrossRef]

Jeong, Y.Y.; Lee, G.Y.; Yoo, Y.C. Bovine Lactoferricin
Induces Intestinal Epithelial Cell Activation through
Phosphorylation of FAK and Paxillin and Prevents
Rotavirus Infection. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 31,
1175

1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Bellamy, W.; Wakabayashi, H.; Takase, M.; Kawase, K.;
Shimamura, S.; Tomita, M. Killing of Candida albicans
by lactoferricin B, a potent antimicrobial peptide
derived from the N-terminal region of bovine
lactoferrin. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 1993, 182, 97

105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Nakamura, A.; Kimura, F.; Tsuji, S.; Hanada, T.;
Takebayashi, A.; Takahashi, A.; Kitazawa, J.; Morimune,
A.; Amano, T.; Kushima, R.; et al. Bovine lactoferrin
suppresses inflammatory cytokine expression in
endometrial stromal cells in chronic endometritis. J.
Reprod. Immunol. 2022, 154, 103761. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef]

References

Grubman, M.J.; Baxt, B. Foot-and-mouth disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 465–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Bauer, K. Foot- and-mouth disease as zoonosis. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 1997, 13, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Aslam, M.; Alkheraije, K.A. The prevalence of foot-and-mouth disease in Asia. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1201578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Arzt, J.; Pacheco, J.M.; Stenfeldt, C.; Rodriguez, L.L. Pathogenesis of virulent and attenuated foot-and-mouth disease virus in cattle. Virol. J. 2017, 14, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Leme, R.A.; Zotti, E.; Alcântara, B.K.; Oliveira, M.V.; Freitas, L.A.; Alfieri, A.F.; Alfieri, A.A. Senecavirus A: An Emerging Vesicular Infection in Brazilian Pig Herds. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2015, 62, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Segalés, J.; Barcellos, D.; Alfieri, A.; Burrough, E.; Marthaler, D. Senecavirus A. Vet. Pathol. 2017, 54, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Ran, X.; Hu, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z.; Wen, X. Prevalence of Senecavirus A in pigs from 2014 to 2020: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Vet. Sci. 2023, 24, e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Preis, G.; Sanhueza, J.M.; Vilalta, C.; Vannucci, F.A.; Culhane, M.R.; Corzo, C.A. Senecavirus A seroprevalence and risk factors in United States pig farms. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 1011975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Wu, H.; Li, C.; Ji, Y.; Mou, C.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, J. The Evolution and Global Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Senecavirus A. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0209022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Dee, S.; Havas, K.; Spronk, G. Detection of Senecavirus A in pigs from a historically negative national swine herd and associated with feed imports from endemically infected countries. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, 3147–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Drago-Serrano, M.E.; Campos-Rodriguez, R.; Carrero, J.C.; de la Garza, M. Lactoferrin and Peptide-derivatives: Antimicrobial Agents with Potential Use in Nonspecific Immunity Modulation. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 1067–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Masson, P.L.; Heremans, J.F. Lactoferrin in milk from different species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Comp. Biochem. 1971, 39, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Hennart, P.F.; Brasseur, D.J.; Delogne-Desnoeck, J.B.; Dramaix, M.M.; Robyn, C.E. Lysozyme, lactoferrin, and secretory immunoglobulin A content in breast milk: Influence of duration of lactation, nutrition status, prolactin status, and parity of mother. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991, 53, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Yamauchi, K.; Tomita, M.; Giehl, T.J.; Ellison, R.T., 3rd. Antibacterial activity of lactoferrin and a pepsin-derived lactoferrin peptide fragment. Infect. Immun. 1993, 61, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Avery, T.M.; Boone, R.L.; Lu, J.; Spicer, S.K.; Guevara, M.A.; Moore, R.E.; Chambers, S.A.; Manning, S.D.; Dent, L.; Marshall, D.; et al. Analysis of Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Human Milk Lactoferrin Compared to Bovine Lactoferrin against Multidrug Resistant and Susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 2116–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Flores-Villaseñor, H.; Canizalez-Román, A.; Reyes-Lopez, M.; Nazmi, K.; de la Garza, M.; Zazueta-Beltrán, J.; León-Sicairos, N.; Bolscher, J.G. Bactericidal effect of bovine lactoferrin, LFcin, LFampin and LFchimera on antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Biometals Int. J. Role Met. Ions Biol. Biochem. Med. 2010, 23, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Pietrantoni, A.; Di Biase, A.M.; Tinari, A.; Marchetti, M.; Valenti, P.; Seganti, L.; Superti, F. Bovine lactoferrin inhibits adenovirus infection by interacting with viral structural polypeptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2688–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Jeong, Y.Y.; Lee, G.Y.; Yoo, Y.C. Bovine Lactoferricin Induces Intestinal Epithelial Cell Activation through Phosphorylation of FAK and Paxillin and Prevents Rotavirus Infection. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Bellamy, W.; Wakabayashi, H.; Takase, M.; Kawase, K.; Shimamura, S.; Tomita, M. Killing of Candida albicans by lactoferricin B, a potent antimicrobial peptide derived from the N-terminal region of bovine lactoferrin. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 1993, 182, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Nakamura, A.; Kimura, F.; Tsuji, S.; Hanada, T.; Takebayashi, A.; Takahashi, A.; Kitazawa, J.; Morimune, A.; Amano, T.; Kushima, R.; et al. Bovine lactoferrin suppresses inflammatory cytokine expression in endometrial stromal cells in chronic endometritis. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2022, 154, 103761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]